Ready-To-Use qPCR for Detection of DNA from <em>Trypanosoma cruzi</em> or Other Pathogenic Organisms

Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa; Steffanie Skau Amadei; Amanda Bert&#227;o-Santos; Tuany Rodrigues

doi:10.3791/63316

JoVE Journal > Biochemistry

Biochemie

Ready-To-Use qPCR for Detection of DNA from Trypanosoma cruzi or Other Pathogenic Organisms

Published: January 20, 2022

doi:

10.3791/63316

Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa^1,2,3, Steffanie Skau Amadei^1,3, Amanda Bertão-Santos^1,2, Tuany Rodrigues^1,3

¹Laboratório de Ciências e Tecnologias Aplicadas em Saúde (LaCTAS), Instituto Carlos Chagas (ICC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), ²Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Bioprocessos e Biotecnologia,Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), ³Pós-graduação em Biociências e Biotecnologia, Instituto Carlos Chagas (ICC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)

Summary

The present work describes the steps for producing ready-to-use qPCR for T. cruzi DNA detection that can be pre-loaded on the reaction vessel and stored in the refrigerator for several months.

Abstract

Real-time PCR (qPCR) is a remarkably sensitive and precise technique that allows for amplifying minute amounts of nucleic acid targets from a multitude of samples. It has been extensively used in many research areas and achieved industrial application in fields such as human diagnostics and trait selection in crops of genetically modified organisms (GMO) crops. However, qPCR is not an error-proof technique. Mixing all reagents into a single master mix subsequently distributed onto 96 wells of a regular qPCR plate might lead to operator mistakes such as incorrect mixing of reagents or inaccurate dispensing into the wells. Here, a technique called gelification is presented, whereby most of the water present in the master mix is substituted by reagents that form a sol-gel mixture when submitted to a vacuum. As a result, qPCR reagents are effectively preserved for a few weeks at room temperature or a few months at 2-8 ^oC. Details of preparing each solution are shown here along with the expected aspect of a gelified reaction designed to detect T. cruzi satellite DNA (satDNA). A similar procedure can be applied to detect other organisms. Starting a gelified qPCR run is as simple as removing the plate from the refrigerator, adding the samples to their respective wells, and starting the run, thus decreasing the setup time of a full-plate reaction to the time it takes to load the samples. Additionally, gelified PCR reactions can be produced and controlled for quality in batches, saving time and avoiding common operator mistakes while running routine PCR reactions.

Introduction

Chagas disease was discovered in the early 20^th century in rural regions of Brazil, where poverty was widespread¹^,². Even today, the disease continues to be connected to social and economic determinants of health in the Americas. Chagas disease is biphasic, comprising an acute and a chronic phase. It is caused by infection by the Trypanosoma cruzi parasite, being transmitted by insect vectors, blood transfusions via congenital route, or oral ingestion of contaminated food³^,⁴.

The diagnostic of Chagas disease can be made through the observation of clinical symptoms (especially the Romaña sign), blood smear microscopy, serology, and molecular tests such as real-time PCR (qPCR) or isothermal amplification⁴^,⁵^,⁶^,⁷^,⁸^,⁹. Clinical symptoms and blood smear microscopy are used in suspected cases of acute infections, while the search for antibodies is used as a screening tool in asymptomatic patients. Because of its sensitivity and specificity, qPCR has been suggested to be used as a monitoring tool for chronic patients, for acute patients undergoing treatment measuring the parasite load in the blood, and as a surrogate marker of therapeutic failure⁶^,⁸^,¹⁰^,¹¹^,¹². Although more sensitive and specific than currently available tests, qPCR is effectively prevented from being known as diagnostic tools in underprivileged regions worldwide due to the requirement of freezing temperatures for transportation and storage¹³^,¹⁴^,¹⁵.

To circumvent this obstacle, conservation techniques such as lyophilization and gelification have been explored¹⁶^,¹⁷. While lyophilization provides conservation for years, it requires specially made reagents without the presence of glycerol, which is commonly used for enzyme stabilization/conservation¹⁸. While gelification has been shown to provide conservation for months, it allows the use of regular reagents¹⁹. The gelification solution comprises four components, each with specific roles in the process: the sugars trehalose and melezitose protect the biomolecules during the desiccation process by reducing free water molecules in the solution, glycogen produces a broader protective matrix, and the amino acid lysine is used as a free radical scavenger to inhibit the oxidizing reactions between the biomolecule's carboxyl, amino and phosphate groups. These components define a sol-gel mixture that prevents the loss of the tertiary or quaternary structure during the desiccation process, thus helping to maintain the biomolecules' activity upon rehydration¹⁹. Once stabilized inside the reaction tubes, the reactions can be stored for a few months at 2-8 °C or a few weeks at 21-23 °C instead of the regular -20 °C. This approach has already been incorporated in tests designed to help diagnose diseases such as Chagas disease, malaria, leishmaniasis, tuberculosis, and cyclosporiasis¹³^,¹⁴^,¹⁵^,²⁰.

The present work describes all the steps to prepare the required solutions for the gelification procedure, the pitfalls in the process, and the expected final aspect of a ready-to-use gelified qPCR inside eight-tube strips. The same protocol can be adapted for single tubes or 96-well plates. Finally, the detection of T. cruzi DNA will be shown as a control run.

Protocol

1. Preparation of stock solutions and gelification mixture

NOTE: Four stock solutions will be prepared (400 mg/mL of melezitose, 400 mg/mL of trehalose, 0.75 mg/mL of lysine, and 200 mg/mL of glycogen) and mixed according to the proportion shown in Table 1 to produce the gelification mixture. Although the protocol describes 10 mL of stock solutions production, it can be adapted for lower or higher volumes.

Melezitose solution
1. Weigh 4 g of melezitose in a 15 mL plastic tube, add 6 mL of nuclease-free water, and vortex at the maximum speed of the instrument until the powder is solubilized.
  NOTE: More water can be added to facilitate solubilization, taking care not to exceed the final volume (see below).
2. Make up the final volume to 10 mL with nuclease-free water. Label and store at 2-8 °C for up to 6 months.
Trehalose solution
1. Weigh 4 g of trehalose in a 15 mL plastic tube, add 6 mL of nuclease-free water, and vortex at the maximum speed of the instrument until the powder is solubilized.
  NOTE: More water can be added to facilitate solubilization, taking care not to exceed the final volume (see below).
2. Make up the volume to 10 mL with nuclease-free water and filter the solution through a 0.2 µm filter. Label and store at 2-8 °C for up to 6 months.
Glycogen solution
1. Weigh 2 g of glycogen in a 15 mL plastic tube, add 6 mL of nuclease-free water, and vortex at the maximum speed of the instrument until the powder is solubilized.
  NOTE: More water can be added to facilitate solubilization, taking care not to exceed the final volume (see below).
2. Keep the solution at rest at 2-8 °C for 8-12 h because the solubilization of glycogen produces lots of bubbles (Figure 1). Make up the volume to 10 mL with nuclease-free water. Label and store at 2-8 °C for up to 6 months.
Lysine solution
1. Weigh 7.5 mg of lysine in a 15 mL plastic tube, add 6 mL of nuclease-free water. Vortex at the maximum speed of the instrument until the powder is solubilized.
  NOTE: More water can be added to facilitate solubilization, taking care not to exceed the final volume (see below).
2. Make up the volume to 10 mL with nuclease-free water and filter the solution through a 0.2 µm filter. Transfer the solution to an amber flask or protect it from light. Label and store at 2-8 °C degrees for up to 6 months.
Gelification Mixture (GM)
1. In a 50 mL plastic tube, mix the volumes of stock solutions according to Table 1.
2. Mix the reagents by ten end-to-end inversions of the tube.
  NOTE: There is no need for a filtration step if this step is performed in a laminar flow safety hood. If this step is not performed in a clean environment, filter the solution through a 0.2 µm filter before transferring it to an amber flask.
3. Transfer the solution to an amber flask or protect it from light. Label and store at 2-8 °C for up to 3 months.
  NOTE: As a quality control step for preparing the gelification mixture, ensure that the measured pH, conductivity, and density values are within the following ranges: pH 5.55-6.66; conductivity 0.630-0.757 mS/cm; and density 1.08-1.11 g/cm³. All measurements should be taken at 25 °C.

2. Preparation of qPCR master mix for gelification

NOTE: In this step, the qPCR master mix for gelification is prepared. Hence, water is not added to the mix but instead, the gelification mixture is added (Table 2).

Thaw the reagents in a refrigerated container. Mix the reagents in a 1.5 mL tube according to Table 2. An example of a reaction with a final volume of 25 µL containing 5 µL of DNA sample is shown here.
NOTE: The DNA sample is not added to the mixture in this step; it is used here solely to calculate the final volumes of each reagent of the qPCR master mix. DNA samples should be added right before starting the run (see step 4 below).

3. Gelification of the reagents on the reaction vessels

Appropriately multiply the volumes shown in Table 2 for preparation of an eight-tube strip or a 96-well plate.
Pipet 18.5 µL of the gelification master mix shown in Table 2 onto each reaction well.
NOTE: This volume represents the volumes of oligonucleotide mix, PCR buffer, and gelification mixture used for one reaction (according to Table 2) and will vary depending on the concentration of the reagents and the volume needed for one reaction. The final volume in the gelification master mix is different from the volume in a regular master mix because water is not added.
Place the tubes/plate in the heat-conductive support (e.g., aluminum) inside the vacuum oven.
NOTE: The heat-conductive support is optional. The operator must ensure that the bottom of the tubes is in contact with the vacuum oven shelf to allow fast thermal equilibrium.
Place one bentonite clay bag for every two 96-well plates.
NOTE: Bentonite clay bags are used to absorb the removed water from the gelification master mix by the differential pressure exerted by the vacuum. Bentonite clay bags were found to be unnecessary for less than two 96-well plates.
Subject the tubes/plate containing the gelification master mix to three vacuum cycles (30 ± 5 mBar) of 30 min each, alternating with vacuum release until the atmospheric pressure is achieved (900-930 mBar), under controlled temperature (30 °C ± 1 °C) (Figure 2).
NOTE: The instrument uses software to control the parameters, and an example of the cycle is shown in Figure 2. The user must create the profile for the run, indicating the chosen parameters.
When the cycle is completed, check the tubes/plates for proper gelification of the reagents by ensuring that the volume is visibly reduced (Figure 3) and that the liquids do not move upon tapping the tubes/plates with fingers.
NOTE: If gelification did not occur, the solution would splatter on the tube walls when tubes are tapped (Figure 3).
Seal and store the tubes/plates at 2-8 °C for 8-12 h before use.

4. Using a gelified qPCR

Remove the tube strip or plate from the refrigerator and open it in a workstation for sample manipulation. Add 15 µL of nuclease-free water to each reaction vessel.
NOTE: The volume of gelified reagents is considered to be about 5 µL. So, together with the DNA sample volume (see below), the final reaction volume is 25 µL.
Add 5 µL of DNA sample.
NOTE: Any qPCR-quality DNA template might be used. In the present work, DNA was extracted from 10⁸ T. cruzi epimastigotes (strain Dm28c) and was serially diluted at a 1:10 ratio using TE buffer.
Seal the tubes/plates and proceed to the equipment of choice. Run the experiment and proceed to regular data analysis.

Representative Results

Three of the reagents that form the gelification mixture are easily solubilized upon vigorous vortexing. However, glycogen requires careful vortexing to ensure the powder has been completely solubilized. Unfortunately, vigorous vortexing produces lots of bubbles, which makes it difficult to determine the actual volume of the solution (Figure 1A–B). Therefore, it is essential to let the glycogen solution rest in the refrigerator until most of the solution trapped within the bubbles has moved down to the main solution body. Considering the production protocols and the lab routine, gelified plates are kept in the refrigerator overnight (or around 8-12 h), resulting in the settling of most of the bubbles, thus making it easier to determine the correct volume and adjust to the desired final volume (Figure 1C). Note the difference in the volume of bubbles between the glycogen tubes in Figures 1B–C, respectively, right after the solubilization and after overnight settling.

Once the gelification mixture is added to the qPCR master mix in substitution for water (Table 2), the tube strips or plates are ready to go to the vacuum oven. The shelves of the vacuum oven contain a Peltier heating element, ensuring that any tubes that are in contact with it remain at the same temperature. In the present protocol, the temperature inside the chamber is kept constant at 30 °C, while the pressure varies between 910-930 mBar (atmospheric pressure) and 30 mBar (near-vacuum). Figure 2 shows these two variables plotted over time, showing the constant temperature (green line, upper panel) and the variation of pressure (red line, lower panel). After the cycles are finished, the master mix inside the well decreases in volume and becomes gelified at the bottom, i.e., without moving or splashing when the tubes are tapped with fingers (Figure 3). The tubes can now be capped and stored at 2-8 °C. The reactions will fail to gelify if the gelification mixture (Table 1) is incorrectly prepared; the proposed quality control step should see the fault before mixing the gelification mixture with qPCR reagents.

To be used, the gelified reagents inside the tubes/plates must be resuspended in nuclease-free water and the DNA sample diluted usually in water or TE buffer. The resuspension of the reagents of the sol-gel mixture is achieved during the first step of denaturation of the qPCR thermal protocol (usually, 5-10 min at 95 °C), so no extra step is required. Figure 4A shows representative traces of the qPCR detection of T. cruzi DNA using published oligonucleotide sequences¹⁵. Suboptimal results include loss of sensitivity, which can be tested with a dilution curve of a solution with a known concentration of genomic targets and loss of specificity, which can be tested with a panel of related trypanosomatid organisms. Figure 4B shows the loss of sensitivity that might arise when the gelification process is not correctly executed or when the reaction loses its stability after being stored at 2-8 °C for more than 6 months.

Figure 1: Solubilization of glycogen produces lots of bubbles. Because glycogen produces too many bubbles during solubilization, the glycogen solution must be kept at rest before adjusting to the final volume. (A) Bubbles formed during vortexing. (B) All of the powder was solubilized, but it is not possible to determine the final volume because of the excess bubbles. (C) After 12 h in the refrigerator (tube in the middle), the volume of bubbles is reduced. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Vacuum cycling (lower panel) and temperature control (upper panel). Representative traces of temperature (upper panel) and pressure (lower panel) variation are shown. Black lines represent the programmed variations, whereas the green and red lines represent actual readings of the instrument. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Aspects of gelified master mix inside an eight-tube strip. (A) qPCR master mixes before the vacuum exposure. (B) Liquid splatters on the tube walls because of incomplete gelification (only one vacuum cycle). (C) Gelified qPCR reagents with a clear visible reduction in volume. The liquid does not splatter on the walls when the tubes are tapped. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Representative traces of gelified master mixes detecting DNA from T. cruzi epimastigotes. DNA extracted from T. cruzi epimastigotes (10⁸ cells) was serially diluted at a 1:10 ratio, and the DNA concentrations ranging between 10⁴ and 10⁰ cells were subjected to detection using a gelified qPCR. (A) The expected result of correctly gelified qPCR (B) Detection of the same samples using a plate where the gelification was not properly executed, resulting in loss of sensitivity. Note that the lower concentrations are detected less frequently in panel B. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Solution	Stock concentration	Volume
Melezitose	400 mg/mL	3 mL
Treahlose	400 mg/mL	6 mL
Lysine	0.75 mg/mL	3 mL
Glycogen	200 mg/mL	3 mL
Nuclease-free water	NA	q.s.p. 20 mL

Table 1: Stock concentrations and volumes of solutions used to produce 20 mL of the gelification mixture. The volume of each stock solution must be proportionally adjusted to produce lower or higher final volumes of the gelification mixture.

Reaction Mix Reagent	Regular mastermix	Gelification mastermix
Oligomix (25X)	1 µL	1 µL
PCR buffer (2X)	12.5 µL	12.5 µL
Gelification Mixture*	–	5 µL
Nuclease-free water	6.5 µL	–
DNA sample*	5 µL	5 µL
*maximum of 20% of the final reaction volume

Table 2: Volumes of reagents to produce qPCR master mixes for regular or gelified reactions. The difference between the two master mixes is that water is added to the regular master mix whereas the gelification mixture is added (i.e., instead of water) to the gelification master mix.

Discussion

Recent years have highlighted the need to find more sensitive and specific technologies to help diagnose tropical and neglected diseases. Although important for epidemiological control, parasitological (optical microscopy) and serological tests have limitations, especially regarding sensitivity and point-of-care applicability. DNA amplification techniques such as PCR, isothermal amplification, and respective variations have long been used in laboratory settings, but technological hurdles preclude it from being used in field settings. One of the main obstacles is the need for temperatures of -20 °C for transportation and storage of the reagents. To remediate this situation, techniques such as lyophilization and gelification have been used to store PCR reactions out of the freezer¹⁶^,¹⁸^,¹⁹.

The present work shows all the steps necessary to gelify a qPCR reaction to detect T. cruzi DNA inside the reaction vessel, be it tubes, tube strips, microfluidic chips, or plates. Preliminary studies using an RT-LAMP reaction suggest that the gelification technique may also be used to preserve and shield other nucleic acid amplification and modification enzymes, as described by Rosado et al.¹⁹. Although relatively straightforward, the two steps that cause most of the operator mistakes in qPCR routines are (a) the preparation of glycogen and melezitose solutions and (b) calculation of the volume of the reaction mix to be added to each reaction tube before the vacuum step. First, the glycogen solution must be refrigerated overnight before the final volume adjustment, and the melezitose solution must be vigorously vortexed (possibly with mild heating at 50 °C) for complete solubilization. Second, the researcher planning the experiment must be aware that the reagents' volumes calculated pre-vacuum might be uneven since water is not added to round up to the reaction volume. The actual reaction volume will be obtained when the gelified reaction is re-solubilized by the addition of sample and water, before running the PCR.

The biggest limitation of the method is the stability of the reactions, which is around 6-8 months at 2-8 °C¹⁴^,¹⁵; it is considerably shorter than lyophilized reactions, which may remain stable for years¹⁸. Depending on the specificity of the oligonucleotide sequences, unspecific binding and amplification might occur, which should be carefully examined by the researchers. For example, Costa and collaborators report that the annealing temperature of the gelified qPCR for detection of C. cayetanensis had to be adjusted in +1 °C to avoid unspecific amplifications¹⁵^,²¹. Similarly, researchers should avoid using enzymes that might be regulated by or use the gelification components as substrates.

The gelification technique is particularly useful because of its ease of use in the laboratory routine as well as an introduction into a production line¹⁶^,¹⁹^,²² allowing smooth quality control; the latter in turn enables robust and comparable data across multiple operators and effectively eliminates common operator mistakes at crucial steps, with a bonus of eliminating freezing temperature requirements during transportation and storage. Preliminary studies suggest that eliminating the cold chain would result in an overall reduction of cost by up to 20% for a qPCR test¹⁴. Elimination of the cold chain also makes it feasible to implement qPCR as a confirmatory test for neglected diseases such as Chagas disease in underdeveloped regions, thus favoring their epidemiological control²³.

Finally, the gelification protocol streamlines the use of qPCR tests as it only requires the user to add water and the extracted T. cruzi DNA, avoiding errors during reagent handling, and decreasing the set-up time as well as the possibility of the reagent's contamination. Such characteristics provide efficiency for a routine diagnostic laboratory, speeding the delivery of results to patients and increasing the reliability of the diagnosis. Lastly, because it dispenses the need for a -20 °C cold chain, it is suitable for diagnostic use in low-resource environments.

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Aline Burda Farias for the technical assistance with the vacuum oven, as well as to the administration at the Instituto de Biologia Molecular do Parana (IBMP, Curitiba, Brazil) for allowing access to the said equipment. This work was partially funded by grant CNPq 445954/2020-5.

Materials

Bentonite clay bags (activated)	Embamat Global Packaging Solutions (Barcelona, Spain)	026157/STD	Not to be confused with silica gel packs
Glycogen	Amersham Bioscience	Cat# US16445
Lysine	Acros Organic	Cat# 365650250
Melezitoze	Sigma-Aldrich	Cat# 63620
Nuclease-free water	preferred vendor
Oligonucleotides	preferred vendor
PCR mastermix	preferred vendor or Instituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná (IBMP, Curitiba, Brazil)	Chagas NAT kit
PCR thermocycler	preferred vendor
software for vacuum oven	Memmert Gmbh	Celsius v10.0
Trehalose	Sigma-Aldrich	Cat# T9531
Trypanosoma cruzi DNA	from in-house cultivated parasites, or purchased from accredited vendors such as ATCC
Vacuum oven	Memmert Gmbh	VO-400

Referenzen

Lewinsohn, R. Carlos Chagas (1879-1934): the discovery of Trypanosoma cruzi and of American trypanosomiasis (foot-notes to the history of Chagas’s disease). Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 73 (5), 513-523 (1979).
Bern, C., et al. Evaluation and treatment of Chagas disease in the United States: A systematic review. The Journal of American Medical Association. 298 (18), 2171-2181 (2007).
Pereira, K. S., et al. Chagas’ disease as a foodborne illness. Journal of Food Protection. 72 (2), 441-446 (2009).
Tanowitz, H. B., et al. Chagas’ disease. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 5 (4), 400-419 (1992).
Rassi, A., Marin-Neto, J. A. Chagas disease. Lancet. 375 (9723), 1388-1402 (2010).
Ramírez, J. C., et al. Analytical validation of quantitative real-time PCR methods for quantification of trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples from chagas disease patients. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 17 (5), 605-615 (2015).
Rivero, R., et al. Rapid detection of Trypanosoma cruzi by colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): A potential novel tool for the detection of congenital Chagas infection. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 89 (1), 26-28 (2017).
Schijman, A. G. Molecular diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Tropica. 184, 59-66 (2018).
Besuschio, S. A., et al. Trypanosoma cruzi loop-mediated isothermal amplification (Trypanosoma cruzi Loopamp) kit for detection of congenital, acute and Chagas disease reactivation. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases. 14 (8), 0008402 (2020).
Duffy, T., et al. Accurate real-time PCR strategy for monitoring bloodstream parasitic loads in chagas disease patients. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases. 3 (4), (2009).
Melo, M. F., et al. Usefulness of real time PCR to quantify parasite load in serum samples from chronic Chagas disease patients. Parasites & Vectors. 8 (1), 154 (2015).
Parrado, R., et al. Usefulness of serial blood sampling and PCR replicates for treatment monitoring of patients with chronic Chagas disease. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 63 (2), 01191 (2019).
de Rampazzo, R. C. P., et al. A ready-to-use duplex qPCR to detect Leishmania infantum DNA in naturally infected dogs. Veterinary Parasitology. 246, 100-107 (2017).
Rampazzo, R. C. P., et al. Proof of concept for a portable platform for molecular diagnosis of tropical diseases. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 21 (5), 839-851 (2019).
Costa, A. D. T., et al. Ready-to-use qPCR for detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis or Trypanosoma cruzi in food matrices. Food and Waterborne Parasitology. 22, 00111 (2021).
Sun, Y., et al. Pre-storage of gelified reagents in a lab-on-a-foil system for rapid nucleic acid analysis. Lab on a Chip. 13, 1509-1514 (2013).
Kamau, E., et al. Sample-ready multiplex qPCR assay for detection of malaria. Malaria Journal. 13, 158 (2014).
Kasper, J. C., Winter, G., Friess, W. Recent advances and further challenges in lyophilization. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 85 (2), 162-169 (2013).
Rosado, P. M. F. S., López, G. L., Seiz, A. M., Alberdi, M. M. Method for preparing stabilised reaction mixtures, which are totally or partially dried, comprising at least one enzyme, reaction mixtures and kits containing said mixtures. PubChem. , (2002).
Ali, N., Bello, G. L., Rossetti, M. L. R., Krieger, M. A., Costa, A. D. T. Demonstration of a fast and easy sample-to-answer protocol for tuberculosis screening in point-of-care settings: A proof of concept study. PLoS One. 15 (12), 0242408 (2020).
Murphy, H. R., Lee, S., da Silva, A. J. Evaluation of an improved U.S. food and drug administration method for the detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in produce using real-time PCR. Journal of Food Protection. 80 (7), 1133-1144 (2017).
Iglesias, N., et al. Performance of a new gelled nested PCR test for the diagnosis of imported malaria: comparison with microscopy, rapid diagnostic test, and real-time PCR. Parasitology Research. 113 (7), 2587-2591 (2014).
Alonso-Padilla, J., Gallego, M., Schijman, A. G., Gascon, J. Molecular diagnostics for Chagas disease: up to date and novel methodologies. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 17 (7), 699-710 (2017).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Diesen Artikel zitieren

Costa, A. D. T., Amadei, S. S., Bertão-Santos, A., Rodrigues, T. Ready-To-Use qPCR for Detection of DNA from Trypanosoma cruzi or Other Pathogenic Organisms. J. Vis. Exp. (179), e63316, doi:10.3791/63316 (2022).