This study compared central versus divided visual field presentations of emotional images to assess differences in motivated attention between the two hemispheres. The late positive potential (LPP) was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) methodologies to assess motivated attention.
Two dominant theories on lateralized processing of emotional information exist in the literature. One theory posits that unpleasant emotions are processed by right frontal regions, while pleasant emotions are processed by left frontal regions. The other theory posits that the right hemisphere is more specialized for the processing of emotional information overall, particularly in posterior regions.
Assessing the different roles of the cerebral hemispheres in processing emotional information can be difficult without the use of neuroimaging methodologies, which are not accessible or affordable to all scientists. Divided visual field presentation of stimuli can allow for the investigation of lateralized processing of information without the use of neuroimaging technology.
This study compared central versus divided visual field presentations of emotional images to assess differences in motivated attention between the two hemispheres. The late positive potential (LPP) was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) methodologies to assess motivated attention. Future work will pair this paradigm with a more active behavioral task to explore the behavioral impacts on the attentional differences found.
Several theories on lateralized processing have been posited for the two cerebral hemispheres. Among these include theories of emotional processing. The valence model1 proposes that the left hemisphere is specialized for pleasant emotions, while the right hemisphere is specialized for unpleasant emotions. The right hemisphere dominance hypothesis2 proposes that the right hemisphere is specialized for processing all emotional information compared to the left hemisphere. Finally, the Circumplex Theory3 proposes that in addition to frontal asymmetries for valence, the posterior regions of the right hemisphere are specialized for processing all high-arousing emotions. In order to test these lateralized theories of processing, methodologies that can differentiate processing between the two hemispheres must be used. While neuroimaging techniques can provide this information, they are often not readily accessible to most research scientists. Further, many standard cognitive paradigms, even when coupled with neuroimaging methodologies, do not isolate information processed within each hemisphere. Divided visual field (DVF) methodologies provide an avenue for behavioral and psychophysiological scientists to test lateralized theories of processing without the use of neuroimaging techniques.
DVF methodologies are based on the knowledge that a stimulus presented to one visual field is initially received and processed by the contralateral hemisphere4. DVF methodologies utilize lateralized presentations of stimuli at short intervals to allow one cerebral hemisphere to receive the information before the other5. As such, stimuli presented briefly to the right visual field are processed contralaterally by the left hemisphere, and stimuli presented to the left visual field are processed by the right hemisphere. In this manner, differences in initial processing of the information in a single hemisphere can be examined. For example, it is well established that the left hemisphere is specialized for processing linguistic information (for a meta-analysis see reference6). Research using DVF paradigms demonstrate increased processing speed when words are presented to the left hemisphere (i.e., displayed in the right visual field) compared to when presented to the right hemisphere.
In order to assess the processing differences between the two hemispheres, measures with finer temporal resolution than behavioral reaction times may be needed. Event-related potentials (ERPs) derived from human electroencephalography (EEG) data have a temporal resolution on the order of milliseconds (ms). As such, using ERP techniques in concert with DVF methodologies allows for a refined assessment of processing differences between the two hemispheres. Initially, central visual field (CVF) presentations of the stimuli can be used to replicate established ERP effects. Then, DVF presentations of the stimuli can be used to examine the unique contributions of each hemisphere to the propagation of these ERP effects. Of particular interest for the current study7, the late positive potential (LPP) has been identified as an ERP component sensitive to the emotional arousal of a stimulus8. Interestingly, the LPP has not been found to consistently differentiate between unpleasant and pleasant stimuli, but rather, responds equally to emotional stimuli relative to neutral stimuli. This study was designed to test the lateralized processing of emotion theories using the LPP as an index of motivated attention toward emotional stimuli between the two hemispheres.
Further, this study systematically examines both the valence and arousal dimensions of the emotion stimuli across early and late manifestations of the LPP. These stimulus manipulations in combination with both CVF and DVF stimulus presentations are unique to the literature, as they allow for examining the unique and interactive influences of valence, arousal, and hemisphere of processing on the propagation of the LPP. As such, the influence of immediacy for action signaled by unpleasant compared to pleasant stimuli, which should differentially engage motivated attention and thus the LPP, can be explored.
All methods described here have been approved by the Internal Review Board for human subject research at the University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
1. Selecting Participants
2. Stimuli
3. Experimental Equipment
4. Preparing the Participant
5. Central Visual Field (CVF) Paradigm
NOTE: In the CVF paradigm, randomly present image stimuli at the center of the screen. Each trial consists of a 500 ms central fixation ("+") followed by a 150 ms presentation of the stimulus, followed by a backward mask that varies randomly in presentation duration between 2,000-4,000 ms. Jittered presentation duration for the mask serves to reduce any anticipatory ERP responses to the onset of the next trial20.
6. Divided Visual Field (DVF) Paradigm
NOTE: The DVF paradigm is identical to the CVF paradigm, including the size of the image stimuli, except present each image stimulus laterally, to the left or right of the fixation mark using the image-presentation slides created in step 2.7 (see Figure 3)4.
7. Data Analysis
To replicate previous research on the LPP, both LPP responses to unpleasant and pleasant images should be larger than LPP responses to neutral images. This is confirmed by the CVF analysis, which finds the LPP in the early epoch to be significantly larger to unpleasant (M = 1.90 μv) and pleasant (M = 1.71 μv) images compared to neutral images (M = 0.72 μv), but unpleasant and pleasant images are not found to be significantly different from each other. Interestingly, in the late epoch, the LPP is found to be larger for unpleasant (M = 1.19 μv) compared to pleasant images (M = 0.56 μv).
To examine the effects of hemisphere of processing on the LPP response to emotional images, differences in the LPP between the hemispheres of presentation are of interest. In this study, the LPP is found to be larger in the early epoch compared to the late epoch for all image presentations except for high-arousing unpleasant images presented to the left hemisphere. These images are not found to elicit significantly different LPP responses between the two epochs (see Table 2). In other words, the LPP response to high-arousing unpleasant images is sustained in comparison to medium-arousal unpleasant images and all pleasant images. This finding can be used to inform the theories of lateralized emotion processing. In particular, these data support theories of emotion processing that propose the right hemisphere is specialized for general emotion identification, while the left hemisphere is specialized for creating specific action plans in response to emotional stimuli28. Here, it appears that the left hemisphere engages high-arousing unpleasant images for longer, possibly to address the need for action or not.
Figure 1: A schematic of the Divided Visual Field (DVF) paradigm. Each trial consists of a centrally presented fixation ("+") for 500 ms, followed by a lateralized stimulus presentation that is paired with a brown rectangle for 150 ms, followed by a backward mask for a random interval between 2,000-4,000 ms. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Mask Presentation for DVF Paradigm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: The DVF paradigm is identical to the CVF paradigm, including the size of the image stimuli, except present each image stimulus laterally, to the left or right of the fixation mark using the image-presentation slides. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
High-Arousing Unpleasant | Medium-Arousing Unpleasant | High-Arousing Pleasant | Medium-Arousing Pleasant | Medium-Arousing Neutral | Low-Arousing Neutral |
3500 | 9000 | 8300 | 1600 | 1080 | 2271 |
6360 | 2750 | 4607 | 2341 | 1030 | 2280 |
9300 | 9432 | 5629 | 7230 | 2810 | 7234 |
3150 | 6311 | 8034 | 1590 | 8010 | 7700 |
6315 | 9265 | 4608 | 2345 | 9913 | 2210 |
3400 | 9320 | 8400 | 1999 | 6930 | 2221 |
6230 | 2276 | 8180 | 1463 | 7560 | 5120 |
6300 | 3181 | 8490 | 4622 | 1303 | 7590 |
2683 | 3051 | 4290 | 1500 | 1112 | 4233 |
9620 | 9911 | 8170 | 2331 | 6900 | 2516 |
6370 | 9420 | 8080 | 7352 | 2780 | 4000 |
6200 | 3061 | 8470 | 2224 | 2690 | 5534 |
6313 | 6243 | 8370 | 8497 | 5535 | 2490 |
9800 | 9006 | 8501 | 8210 | 7211 | 7180 |
9921 | 9340 | 4220 | 2650 | 1935 | 2830 |
9910 | 9561 | 8190 | 2310 | 6314 | 9070 |
9810 | 3300 | 4676 | 4610 | 7820 | 7224 |
6560 | 3101 | 4690 | 1721 | 1101 | 2383 |
6212 | 3180 | 4687 | 8090 | 7503 | 2272 |
6570 | 2205 | 4659 | 2352 | 5970 | 7920 |
6540 | 9280 | 4689 | 5460 | 9582 | 7031 |
6415 | 9415 | 4670 | 2303 | 1240 | 9210 |
6821 | 9342 | 8186 | 2208 | 9402 | 9401 |
9050 | 9220 | 4680 | 8540 | 3210 | 2480 |
6260 | 9560 | 8030 | 2395 | 1390 | 7595 |
2730 | 9140 | 5470 | 4641 | 2230 | 2590 |
6510 | 9421 | 4660 | 4700 | 1945 | 7025 |
6312 | 9301 | 8200 | 5480 | 1230 | 2215 |
9600 | 9181 | 5621 | 7260 | 2410 | 7186 |
9250 | 9435 | 8185 | 8461 | 9411 | 2441 |
Table 1: Stimuli ID numbers for selected stimuli for O'Hare, Atchley and Young (2016) from the IAPS sorted by arousal and valence groups.
Left Hemisphere | Right Hemisphere | |||
Early Epoch | Late Epoch | Early Epoch | Late Epoch | |
High-Arousing Unpleasant | 2.839 | 2.629 | 2.48 | 0.968* |
High-Arousing Pleasant | 2.521 | 1.783* | 3.03 | 1.8* |
Table 2: Mean LPP amplitudes for the DVF analysis.
In this study, manipulations of stimulus valence and arousal were used with the DVF paradigm to test theories of lateralized processing of emotion as they apply to the motivated attention network. However, DVF methodologies can be used to explore any lateralized processing of visual information. What is critical when using DVF paradigms is the control of the stimuli presentation to ensure that the information is isolated to one hemisphere for initial processing. There are several key steps to the DVF paradigm that contribute to this aspect of the research.
First, participants are instructed to keep their eyes fixated at the center of the screen. A fixation mark, bilateral dummy stimulus (or placeholder), and a head-stabilizing chin rest are used to assist participants with maintaining this fixation. Nonetheless, participants will occasionally shift their gaze to the laterally presented stimuli. Trials in which an eye shift occurred should not be included in the analyses, as fixating on the stimulus allows both hemispheres to receive the information simultaneously. In ERP research, horizontal eye shifts can be detected in the EEG data, and those trials can be removed. In behavioral research, it may be necessary to continuously use a mirror or eye tracking to monitor eye movements.
In addition to controlling for eye shifts, stimuli need to be presented in a manner that prevents bilateral processing. To do this, it is recommended that stimuli appear no less than 3° of visual angle from the fixation. It is also important not to present stimuli too laterally, where visual acuity will decline. Stimuli extending beyond 10° of visual angle from the fixation are at risk for low visual acuity (see reference4 for a detailed discussion). Additionally, stimuli need to be presented below the average express saccade latency (150 ms)21. Express saccades are reflexive eye shifts to changes in the visual field, such as a stimulus appearing. Additionally, displaying a backward mask following the offset of the stimulus disrupts any early, bilateral processing of the stimulus22. Presenting the mask stimulus immediately after the experimental stimulus does add another visual stimulus to the ERP window, possibly contaminating the resulting ERP components. However, consistently using the mask stimulus across all trials of interest still allows for the examination of the effects of stimulus variables, such as valence and arousal, beyond these basic visual processing effects, as they should cancel out across the comparison of conditions.
EEG and ERPs are one way to assess the impact of lateralized processing of stimuli. It is important when using these methodologies to know if the ERP components you intend to analyze are subject to shifting their topographies following lateralized presentations of stimuli. For the LPP, previous DVF studies did not find topographical shifts29,30, but other ERP components may be sensitive to visual field side of presentation. Larger ERP amplitudes are indices of additional processing resources being used to process any given presentation of a stimulus. For example, in this study, larger LPP responses were found in the late epoch for high-arousing unpleasant images presented to the left hemisphere. This is interpreted as the left hemisphere engaging in more elaborate processing of these stimuli compared to the right hemisphere or compared to pleasant or neutral stimuli.
Behavioral tasks can also be used to assess the effects of lateralized processing of stimuli. In this case, changes in accuracy or reaction time in response to the lateralized presentations of stimuli can be interpreted as differences in the efficiency of the two hemispheres in processing that type of information. For example, both accuracy and reaction time differences between hemispheres of presentation have been found in DVF semantic priming tasks31.
DVF paradigms can be limited in that the presentation duration of the stimuli must be kept below 150 ms to prevent saccades and bilateral processing. As such, complex stimuli that require longer processing may be inappropriate for this methodology. Further, DVF paradigms can only be used to make inferences about processing in an entire cerebral hemisphere. Investigating processing within specific brain regions at a finer level than cerebral hemisphere is not possible with DVF techniques alone. If specific brain regions are part of the research question, neuroimaging or ERP techniques must be used in concert with the DVF paradigm.
DVF paradigms provide an avenue for studying lateralized processing in the brain without the need for neuroimaging equipment. This makes the study of the brain more accessible to all researchers. In the study of lateralized processing of emotional information, future studies that pair DVF presentations of systematically controlled emotional stimuli with a behavioral task can further explore the unique contributions of each cerebral hemisphere to our emotional experience.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
None.
64-channel Ag-AgCl active electrodes | Cortech Solutions | DA-AT-ESP32102064A/DA-AT-ESP32102064B | EEG electrodes for data collection |
ActiveTwo Base System | Cortech Solutions | DA-AT-BCBS | Digitizes and ampliphies EEG data at 500 Hz |
E-Prime Professional 2.0 | Psychology Software Tools | NA | Stimulus presentation software, available at https://www.pstnet.com/eprime.cfm |
CURRY 7.0 | Compumedics Neuroscan | NA | EEG/ERP data processing and analysis, available at http://compumedicsneuroscan.com/products/by-name/curry/ |