JoVE Journal > Neuroscience
Summary
Abstract
Introduction
Protocol
Ergebnisse
Discussion
Offenlegungen
Acknowledgements
Materials
Referenzen
Neurowissenschaften

Rapid Genotyping of Animals Followed by Establishing Primary Cultures of Brain Neurons

Published: January 29, 2015
doi:
10.3791/51879
, , ,
1Department of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics,University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 2Department of Psychiatry,University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 3EZ BioResearch LLC

Summary

We describe procedures for labeling and genotyping newborn mice and generating primary neuronal cultures from them. The genotyping is rapid, efficient and reliable, and allows for automated nucleic-acid extraction. This is especially useful for neonatally lethal mice and their cultures that require prior completion of genotyping.

Abstract

High-resolution analysis of the morphology and function of mammalian neurons often requires the genotyping of individual animals followed by the analysis of primary cultures of neurons. We describe a set of procedures for: labeling newborn mice to be genotyped, rapid genotyping, and establishing low-density cultures of brain neurons from these mice. Individual mice are labeled by tattooing, which allows for long-term identification lasting into adulthood. Genotyping by the described protocol is fast and efficient, and allows for automated extraction of nucleic acid with good reliability. This is useful under circumstances where sufficient time for conventional genotyping is not available, e.g., in mice that suffer from neonatal lethality. Primary neuronal cultures are generated at low density, which enables imaging experiments at high spatial resolution. This culture method requires the preparation of glial feeder layers prior to neuronal plating. The protocol is applied in its entirety to a mouse model of the movement disorder DYT1 dystonia (ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice), and neuronal cultures are prepared from the hippocampus, cerebral cortex and striatum of these mice. This protocol can be applied to mice with other genetic mutations, as well as to animals of other species. Furthermore, individual components of the protocol can be used for isolated sub-projects. Thus this protocol will have wide applications, not only in neuroscience but also in other fields of biological and medical sciences.

Introduction

Rodent models of genetic diseases have proven useful in establishing the physiological functions of normal proteins and nucleic acids, as well as the pathophysiological consequences of defects in these. Examples include mice deficient for proteins involved in key cellular functions, as well as mouse models of disorders such as Alzheimer's disease. However, certain genetic manipulations can lead to neonatal lethality shortly or a few days after birth. In these cases, primary cell cultures are an important tool because live cells can be obtained from the embryonic or neonatal pups before death, they can be maintained for at least a few weeks in vitro, and during this time early neuronal development can be followed by biochemical, functional and morphological experiments. For the primary cultures, it can be beneficial to plate the neurons at low density; this makes it possible to visualize the individual somata, dendrites, axonal shafts and nerve terminals at high spatial resolution. However, the survival and differentiation of neurons at low density typically requires that they are plated on a glial feeder layer, co-cultured with glial cells in the absence of physical contact with them, or cultured in medium conditioned by glia 1.

The establishment of low-density neuronal cultures on glial feeder layers can be dependent on fast and reliable genotyping beforehand – within a few hr in contrast to a few days. Speed is especially important when the neuronal genotype needs to be matched to that of a glial feeder layer prepared beforehand. As a more practical example, it may be necessary to decide which pups of which genotype to use in generating cultures, to optimize the efficiency of an experiment.

Here we demonstrate the working protocol that has been used for fast, simplified and reliable mouse genotyping in previous publications 2-6. Mouse tails and a commercially available kit are used. This protocol includes single-step extraction of nucleic acids from the tissue, and requires neither a nucleic-acid purification step nor use of a termination buffer ('stop solution'). The reliability of this genotyping method is illustrated by presenting the results of a series of tests when differences are introduced with respect to the starting amount of the specimens, the age of the animals and the length of the PCR amplicons. This kit offers the advantages of automated extraction and reliability.

For the sake of being comprehensive, the use of tattooing for long-term identification of the genotyped mice is also demonstrated. Tattooing is achieved by applying tattooing ink to the dermis of the skin (under the epidermis) 7. A procedure is described for tattooing the paw pads of newborn or 1 day old mice, although tattoos can be applied to other parts of the body, such as tails and toes, and to animals of all ages. In addition, procedures will be demonstrated for plating and culturing mouse neurons at a low density, based on optimized preparation of different types of glial feeder layers 2,8.

We use a genetic mouse model of the inherited neurological disorder DYT1 dystonia – an autosomal-dominant movement disorder caused by a mutation in the gene TOR1A (c.904_906delGAG/c.907_909delGAG; p.Glu302del/p.Glu303del) 9. The encoded protein, torsinA, belongs to the “ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities” (AAA+) family of proteins, whose members generally perform chaperone-like functions, assisting in: protein unfolding, protein-complex disassembly, membrane trafficking, and vesicle fusion 10-13. The mutation results in an in-frame deletion of a codon for glutamic acid, and can lead to manifestation of 'early-onset generalized isolated dystonia' 14,15. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for this disorder remain poorly understood. In a knock-in mouse model, the mutant allele is Tor1atm2Wtd, mentioned hereafter as Tor1aΔE. Heterozygous ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice are viable and genetically mimic human patients with DYT1 dystonia, whereas homozygous knock-in mice die after birth 16,17, with the latency to postnatal death affected by genetic background 18. The early death of homozygous knock-in mice necessitates that both the genotyping of animals and the establishment of neuronal cultures are completed rapidly. As another example of genotyping, Tfap2a (transcription factor AP-2α, activating enhancer binding protein 2α) will be used. The protein encoded by this gene is important in regulating multiple cellular processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, survival and apoptosis 19.

Protocol

NOTE: All animal procedures performed in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Iowa.

1. Long-term Identification of Mice Using Tattooing the Paw Pads

  1. Immobilize a paw with the paw pad (plantar surface) facing the experimenter. Hold the paw with the thumb and the index finger. Be careful not to pinch the paw.
    NOTE: Stable immobilization is important to ensure that the tattoo pigment is placed into the dermis of the paw pad, and thus is permanent 7.
  2. Swab the paw pad with 70% ethanol on a gauze sponge or swab.
  3. Apply skin oil to a cotton-tipped applicator, and gently press the tip against the surface of the paw pad several times. Use only a small amount of skin oil; when present in large amounts, it will prevent the tattoo pigment from reaching the skin.
  4. Dip the tips of the tattoo needles into the tattooing ink just prior to tattooing. Use clean, aseptic and sharp tattooing needles, to decrease the pain and the possibility of infection, and also to increase the tattooing efficiency.
  5. While the paw pad surface is covered with the skin oil, press the tattoo needle tips vertically and lightly against the skin in the center of the paw pad, and inject the ink multiple times. See Table of Materials/Equipment for information about electric tattooing system.
  6. Spray 70% ethanol on a gauze sponge, gently press it against the paw to remove extra tattoo pigment on the skin surface, and inspect the quality of tattoo. Check that the middle of paw pad has a dark, round spot that differs from normal skin pigmentation. If the tattoo is not dark or large enough for easy viewing, repeat the prior tattooing steps.

2. Genotyping Newborn Mice Using a Fast PCR Genotyping Kit

  1. Disinfect the distal end of a mouse tail with 70% ethanol, cut 5 mm or less of the tail tip and transfer it to a tube of an 8-tube strip of the type used for PCR. Use an un-used razor blade for each pup to avoid cross contamination between specimens. Alternatively, use a pair of scissors, but in this case, carefully and thoroughly remove the remaining tissue on the blades using 70% ethanol. Check for bleeding. If bleeding occurs, apply pressure to the cut portion of the tail with a gauze sponge until bleeding has stopped.
  2. Add 200 µl of DNA Extraction Solution to each PCR tube containing a specimen. See Table of Materials/Equipment for its composition and information about the kit.
  3. Place the tube strip into a PCR thermal cycler, and start the DNA extraction using the following program: 1 cycle at 55 °C for 10 min, 1 cycle at 95 °C for 10 min, and holding at 4 °C.
    NOTE: This is the same PCR thermal cycler that is later used for PCR.
  4. After the DNA extraction is finished, remove the tube strip from the thermal cycler and invert 5 times.
  5. Transfer 4 µl of the solution (DNA extract) of each specimen to an un-used tube of an 8-tube strip, and mix with: 10 µl of 2X PCR Ready Mix II, 2 µl of mixed forward & reverse primers (recommended at 0.5 µM; see Table of Materials/Equipment for sequences), and 4 µl of nuclease-free H2O, for each specimen. Spin briefly (e.g., 3 sec) using a table-top centrifuge. Keep the tubes on ice at all times except when handling.
  6. Perform thermal cycling. See Table of Materials/Equipment for the thermal program.
  7. Detect the amplified DNA products. Load the total reaction solution from the PCR (20 µl) directly into a well of an agarose gel. Load the molecular weight markers into a separate well. Apply an electric field.
  8. Acquire fluorescence images of the bands under ultraviolet light.

3. Primary Culture of Mouse Brain Neurons on Glial Feeder Layer

NOTE: The procedures for brain dissection and cell dissociation (3.1) are common to all the subsequent procedures. The procedures for mouse glial cultures (3.2), rat glial cultures (3.3), and mouse neuronal cultures (3.4) are described separately afterwards.

  1. Brain Dissection and Cellular Dissocaiation
    1. Sacrifice one mouse or rat pup by decapitation, rapidly remove the brain, and place it into Hanks' solution (see Table 1 for composition) + 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a 35 mm dish (kept on ice).
    2. Cut the brain through the midline into two hemispheres. Remove the region of interest(e.g., cerebral cortex, striatum and hippocampus) from each hemisphere of the brain. Remove the meninges and major blood vessels from the surface. Cut the brain region into 4-10 thin slices using a surgical blade.
    3. Rinse the brain slices in a 15 ml centrifugation tube, once with Hanks' solution + 20% FBS, then 3 times with the Hanks' solution (i.e., without serum) (all at 4 °C). To rinse, add 5-10 ml solution, let the brain slices settle at the bottom of the tube, aspirate the solution from the top, and add a fresh solution. Finish the rinsing procedure by aspirating the solution.
    4. Filter 2 ml of the trypsin-containing digestion solution (see Table 1 for composition) using a 3 ml syringe and a 0.2 µm syringe filter, and add the filtrate directly into the tube containing the brain slices. Let the trypsinization proceed for 13 min at RT.
    5. Neutralize the trypsin solution first by aspirating most of it and then by adding 7-10 ml of Hanks' solution + 20% FBS (4 °C).
    6. Rinse the brain slices, twice with Hanks' solution + 20% FBS, and then three times with the Hanks' solution (i.e. without serum) (all at 4 °C). Finish the rinsing procedure by aspirating the solution.
    7. Filter 2 ml of the dissociation solution (see Table 1 for composition) using a 3 ml syringe and a 0.2 μm syringe filter, and add the filtrate directly to the tube with the brain slices.
    8. Mechanically dissociate the cells by gently triturating 10-20 times, until visible tissue pieces disappear. Use a cotton-plugged, fire-polished Pasteur pipette and avoid making bubbles during trituration.
    9. Wait 3 min for small pieces to settle down.
    10. Transfer the majority of the solution (~1.5 ml, leaving some solution at the bottom) to a 15 ml centrifugation tube that contains 3 ml Hanks' solution + 20% FBS solution (4 °C), using the cotton-plugged, fire-polished Pasteur pipette. Do not transfer all the solution because the inclusion of any sediment at the bottom typically results in deterioration of the culture.
    11. Centrifuge for 13 min at ~185 g (~1,100 rpm) at 4 °C.
    12. Aspirate the supernatant gently, add 1 ml of pre-warmed plating medium (37 °C) to the pellet, and resuspend it by gently pipetting several times using the cotton-plugged, fire-polished Pasteur pipette.
      NOTE: Three different types of plating media are used for different culture purposes: plating medium-1 for mouse glial cells, plating medium-2 for mouse neurons, and plating medium-3 for rat neurons and glial cells (see Table 1 for compositions).
    13. Take out 10 μl of the cell suspension, mix it with 10 μl of 0.4% trypan blue solution, and measure the density of live cells, using either a hemocytometer or an automated cell counter.
  2. Mouse Glial Cultures
    1. Wash the coverslips to help establish healthy cultures of mouse cells.
      1. Immerse glass coverslips (round, 12 mm diameter) in 70% nitric acid in a glass Petri dish. Protect from light using aluminum foil, and place it on an orbital shaker O/N.
      2. Rinse the glass coverslips in the Petri dish at least three times with distilled water. Immerse them in distilled water. Place the dish on an orbital shaker O/N.
      3. Dry the coverslips on a Whatman 150 mm filter paper in the biological safety cabinet.
      4. Autoclave the coverslips.
      5. Place the coverslips into 24-well culture dish.
    2. Label and genotype newborn mice according to steps 1 and 2.
    3. Obtain the brain cells from the mouse pups, according to step 3.1.
      NOTE: Use of the cerebral cortex is typical for preparing the mouse glial feeder layer. However, other brain regions, such as hippocampus and striatum, will work after proper adjustment of cell density due to different numbers and yields of cells from different regions.
    4. Add ~4 ml of pre-warmed plating medium-1 to the final cell suspension (~1 ml). For pre-warming culture media, place the solution in the culture incubator (5% CO2-95% O2, 37 °C) O/N, to allow the temperature and pH values to stabilize.
    5. Transfer the cell suspension to an uncoated T25 culture flask, using the cotton-plugged, fire-polished Pasteur pipette. Place the flask in the culture incubator.
    6. At 1 day in vitro (DIV), rinse the cultured cells in the T25 flask twice with plating medium-1 (4 °C). Place the flask back into the incubator. Perform rinsing by aspirating the medium inside the flask completely with a Pasteur pipette, adding ~5 ml of fresh medium and gently tilting the flask several times in a swirling motion.
    7. At 6-9 DIV, (i.e., one day before trypsinization and plating on coverslips, in steps 3.2.8-3.2.13), place 100 µl of the coating material with extracellular matrix proteins (see Table of Materials/Equipment for comments about the coating material) on the glass coverslips in a culture dish, and place the culture dish in the culture incubator.
    8. At 7-10 DIV, when the cells are 20-40% confluent (spatially continuous), trypsinize them.
      1. Rinse the flask once, by aspirating all the solution within the flask and adding ~13 ml of Hanks' solution (4 °C), gently tilt the flask several times in a swirling motion, and aspirate the solution completely.
      2. Add 40 µl of DNase solution (final concentration, 750 units/ml) to 4 ml Trypsin-EDTA solution, pass the solution through a 0.2 µm syringe filter, and add the filtrate directly to the cells in the flask.
      3. Let the trypsinization proceed for 13 min at 37 °C in the incubator.
      4. Neutralize the trypsin solution by adding 2 ml of 100% FBS (4 °C) to the flask.
      5. Transfer the trypsinized cells to a 15 ml centrifugation tube using a 5- to 10-ml pipette, add ~4 ml of Hanks' solution + 20% FBS (4 °C), centrifuge at ~185 g and 4 °C for 13 min, and aspirate the supernatant.
    9. Resuspend the pellet in 1 ml of pre-warmed plating medium-1.
    10. Measure the density of the cells according to step 3.1.13.
    11. Aspirate the coating material completely from the glass coverslips, and plate ~50 μl of the resuspended glial cells on coverslips.
      NOTE: These cells will establish the glial feeder layer.
    12. Place the culture dish with coverslips in the incubator.
    13. 20-60 min later, add 1 ml of pre-warmed plating medium-1 to each well, and place the dish back in the incubator. Note: While the plating medium is added, it will be helpful to use another pipette to press down the periphery of the coverslip (where there are no plated cells), so that the coverslip will not float in the medium.
    14. At 1 DIV of the glial feeder layer (i.e., on the glass coverslip), replace the medium with 1 ml of pre-warmed plating medium-1, by aspirating all of the solution in a well and then filling it with fresh medium.
    15. At 2-3 DIV of the glial feeder layer when the cells are 80-100% confluent, add mitotic inhibitor (10 µl of a mixture of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine + uridine; final concentrations of 81.2 and 204.8 µM, respectively) to each well, to inhibit DNA replication and therefore to suppress glial-cell proliferation.
    16. At 7-9 DIV, when the cells are 90-100% confluent (1-2 hr before plating neurons on the glial feeder layer), replace the culture medium with pre-warmed plating medium-2 (37 °C).
      NOTE: Neurons will be plated on the same day, using step 3.4.
  3. Rat Glial Cultures
    1. Coat a T25 culture flask with the same coating material.
      NOTE: This is necessary for later removal of non-adherent cells in step 3.3.5.
      1. Add 2.0 ml of the coating material to the flask, and place the flask in the culture incubator.
      2. After 2-3 hr, aspirate the coating material completely, such that the floor of the flask becomes dry.
    2. Obtain the cells from the rat pups, according to step 3.1.
      NOTE: The CA3-CA1 region of the hippocampus is used for preparing the rat glial feeder layer. However, other brain regions, such as the cerebral cortex and striatum, will work after adjusting for differences in cell density due to different numbers and yields of cells from different regions.
    3. Add ~4 ml of pre-warmed plating medium-3 to the final cell suspension (~1 ml).
    4. Transfer the cell suspension into the coated T25 culture flask, using the cotton-plugged, fire-polished Pasteur pipette. Place the flask in the culture incubator (5% CO2-95% O2, 37°C).
    5. At 2-3 DIV, when cells are 20-40% confluent, remove non-adherent or weakly adherent cells, by closing the lid tightly, shaking the flask vigorously ~10 times, aspirating the solution, and adding 4-5 ml of plating medium-3 (at 4 °C). Repeat this procedure once. Examine the cultured cells across the entire flask floor (e.g., using phase-contrast microscope) to confirm that those that appear neuronal (i.e., those for which the outer rim of the cell body appears phase-bright) are completely removed. Repeat the procedure as often as necessary to remove these cells, and then return the flask to the incubator.
      NOTE: The strength and the total number of 'shakes' required may differ among individual experimenters. The important thing is not to keep the total number of shakes to a set number, but to confirm that neuron-like cells are eliminated.
    6. At 6-8 DIV, when cells are 90-100% confluent, passage the glial cells by trypsinizing them as in step 3.2.8.
    7. After centrifugation, resuspend the pellet in 1 ml of plating medium-3 (4 °C), add 10 ml of plating medium-3 (4 °C), transfer the trypsinized cells to an un-coated T75 flask, and culture them in the incubator.
      NOTE: Rat glial cells will be passaged twice; in contrast the mouse glial cells are passaged only once because they become unhealthy after multiple passages. Rat glial cells will be passaged in T75 flasks that are not coated with any coating material. The coating allows rat glial cells to grow too quickly and yield many ciliated cells (putative ependymal cells), which will deteriorate the neuronal culture condition later.
    8. At 17-19 DIV of glial culture in a flask (i.e., 11 days after passaging and one day before trypsinization and plating onto coverslips by steps 3.3.9-3.3.14), place 100 µl of the coating material on unwashed glass coverslips (round, 12 mm diameter) in a culture dish, and place the culture dish in the culture incubator.
      NOTE: For rat glial cultures, a difference was not noticed in the culture results with or without washing the coverslips.
    9. At 18-20 DIV of glial culture in a flask (i.e., 12 days after passaging), prepare the glial feeder layer by trypsinizing the cultured cells, according to step 3.2.8.
    10. During centrifugation, aspirate the coating material completely from the glass coverslips.
    11. After centrifugation, resuspend the pellet in 1 ml of plating medium-3 (4 °C), and measure the cell density, according to step 3.1.13.
    12. Adjust the glial density to 104 live cells/ml, and plate 100 µl of the glial cell suspension on the coated glass coverslips.
      NOTE: These cells will establish the glial feeder layer.
    13. Place the culture dish with coverslips into the incubator for 20-60 min.
    14. Add 1 ml of plating medium-3 (4 °C) to each well, and place the dish back in the incubator.
    15. At 3-4 DIV of the glial feeder layer, when the cells on the coverslip are 40-80% confluent, add 1 ml of the pre-warmed growth medium (see Table 1 for composition) that contains cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside (AraC, final concentration of 4 µM) to stop glial-cell proliferation. Plate neurons at 7-9 DIV of the glial feeder layer when the cells are 60-80% confluent, using step 3.4.
  4. Mouse Neuronal Cultures
    1. Label and genotype newborn mice according to steps 1 and 2.
    2. Use the mouse pups for step 3.1.
    3. Adjust the density of live-cell suspension to ~2.0 x 105 cells/ml using pre-warmed plating medium-2 for plating on mouse glial cells, or using plating medium-3 for plating on rat glial cells.
    4. Plate the cells on the glial feeder layer, by gently adding the cell suspension to the culture medium of each well. Note: The volume of the cell suspension to be added will be determined by the target number of cells in a culture well. For example, plate ~60 µl of cell suspension to achieve 12,000 cells/well.
    5. Note that no solution changes are necessary after the neurons are plated. Be careful to avoid evaporation of the solution from the wells over the course of culture, by humidifying the inside of the culture incubator.

Representative Results

As an example of the application of this protocol, representative results are shown for labeling mice by tattooing, reliable genotyping under various experimental conditions, and establishing primary neuronal cultures on glial feeder layers.

Tattooing

Newborn pups were labeled on the paw pads using a tattooing system ('Newborn' in Figure 1). The labels remained clearly visible at 3 weeks ('3-week-old') and 32 weeks of age ('32-week-old'). The individual mice can be uniquely identified by a combination of tattoos on the four paws (numbers 1-16) and by the information about the animal cage, or more complex numbering schemes (not shown).

Genotyping

One representative example of genotyping is shown (Figure 2). The Tor1a gene of wild-type (Tor1a+/+), heterozygous (Tor1a+/ΔE) and homozygous (Tor1aΔE/ΔE) ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice was amplified from the genomic DNA isolated from tail clips of newborn pups. Genotyping in this specific example is based on the presence of a single 34-base-pair loxP site in the mutant Tor1a allele after successful Cre recombination and deletion of a neomycin resistance cassette 16,18.

Genomic DNA was extracted with minimal hands-on time, and many samples were processed simultaneously. The extraction volumes were kept constant, and therefore no adjustment of the volume was necessary to accommodate the changes in conditions tested. The reliability of genotyping was tested under four conditions, as detailed below.

First, the effect of differences in the amount of starting tissue was examined (Figure 3). Tails of different lengths were prepared from the heterozygous ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice (Tor1a+/ΔE) at weaning age (~3 weeks). Tail lengths of 2 to 5 mm, the range typically recommended in genotyping protocols, gave the same genotyping result of high quality. The two bands correspond to the wild-type and mutated alleles (Tor1a+ and Tor1aΔE, respectively).

Second, the effects of variability in animal age were examined (Figure 4). Tails were obtained from newborn, 3-week-old and ~24-week-old heterozygous ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice (Tor1a+/ΔE). Homozygotes were not used because they die several days after birth 16-18. The two expected bands for wild-type and mutated Tor1a genes were visible regardless of animal age (Figure 4A). The general applicability of this result was tested using a second gene, Tfap2a19 in wild-type mice (Tfap2a+/+) (Figure 4B).

Third, the effects of differences in length of the PCR amplicons were tested (Figure 5). For this purpose, different primer pairs were synthesized for a given gene, such that the amplified DNAs are of different base pair lengths. The Tfap2a gene was consistently detected with different amplicon lengths.

Fourth, two DNA extraction methods were compared (Figure 6). In one method, PCR strip tubes and the PCR thermal cycler were used (described in step 2). This is an automated, parallel multi-tube extraction method ('Auto' in Figure 6). Because multiple tubes can be handled simultaneously in strip format, and a PCR machine is used with a program to operate in four temperature steps, there is no need to transfer the tubes, manually change the temperature during the extraction or use multiple pieces of equipment. Thus it is easy to process many specimens. This was compared with the second method based on manual, single-tube extraction ('Manual' in Figure 6). This uses individual PCR tubes and separate non-PCR machines (heat blocks and water baths) to control temperature during DNA extraction. In this case, multiple, single tubes were moved to a new temperature after each step, requiring multiple temperature-controlling apparatuses. In both cases, the Tor1a gene was analyzed in wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice (Figure 6A), and the Tfap2a gene was analyzed in wild-type mice (Figure 6B). The two extraction protocols yielded equivalent genotyping results.

In summary, the results presented in Figures 3 auf 6 demonstrate that the genotyping method is robust, achieving reliable and reproducible results in spite of variations in tissue amount, animal age, amplicon length, and the extraction protocol used.

Neuronal cultures

For culturing mouse neurons on the mouse glial feeder layer, the order of the procedures is: (tattooing newborn mice → genotyping for glial culture →) glial culture → tattooing newborn mice → genotyping for neuronal culture → neuronal culture. For cultures established on the rat glial feeder layer, the procedures in parentheses are skipped.

We examined the supportive effect of the pre-seeded glial feeder layer on neuronal survival and growth. Neurons were obtained from the CA3-CA1 region of hippocampus, the motor region of cerebral cortex, and the striatum of newborn wild-type mice. They were plated at low density on rat glial feeder layer that had been obtained from the CA3-CA1 region of hippocampus and seeded prior to neuronal plating, according to the scheme illustrated in Figure 7 (simplified summary of the procedures). Low-density cultures are optimal for the imaging of individual dendrites, somata 4,6, nerve terminals 2,3,5,8 and axonal shafts 5 at high spatial resolution. The hippocampal cells (containing both neurons and glial cells) were plated on coated glass coverslips, either with (Figure 8A) or without a pre-established glial feeder layer (Figure 8B, C) and observed with phase-contrast optics. In the presence of a nearly confluent glial feeder layer, the neurons (in each panel, an arrowhead indicates one representative neuron) were relatively dispersed 3 and 7 days after plating (days in vitro, DIV) (Figure 8A). They also showed signs of good health, such as a clear margin of neuronal somata, extended dendrites, a lack of clustered somata, and a lack of bundled neurites (high-magnification images in insets). At 14 DIV, these neurons formed a dense network characterized by long neurites (dendrites and axons). Note that glial proliferation was inhibited before neurons were plated, by adding growth medium containing the mitotic inhibitor AraC (step 3.3.15).

In contrast, in the absence of the glial feeder layer at the time of plating hippocampal neurons, the growth of the cultured hippocampal neurons was impaired, even in the absence of AraC. At 3 DIV, glial cells (included in the newly plated hippocampal cells) have not formed a confluent sheet (asterisk in top panel of Figure 8B). The cultures showed several signs that are not appropriate for high-resolution imaging studies, such as wide areas without underlying glial cells (asterisk), the presence of clustered somata and the presence of bundled neurites in some areas (data not shown). By 7 DIV, glial cells formed a confluent sheet (middle panel of Figure 8C). However, neurons were fewer in number than when the neurons were plated on a pre-established glial feeder layer. The surviving neurons also lacked long, network-forming neurites (inset). The glial cells were more heterogeneous in curvature and thickness than those in the feeder layer culture, thus appearing phase-bright. In order to test the effects of suppressing glial proliferation on neurons, we applied AraC-containing growth medium. When AraC was added on 3 or 7 DIV and the cells were cultured until 14 DIV and observed on this day (Figure 8B and C, bottom panels), the glial cells covered most of the coverslip surface. However, the neurons were still few in number, especially when AraC was applied at 7 DIV. The surviving neurons had only short processes and were not extensively connected. Thus, the late addition of AraC allowed a uniform glial layer to form but did not promote neuronal viability or neurite extension; rather the uncontrolled glial growth had deleterious effects on neurons.

These data show that the glial feeder layer is critical for the survival and growth of neurons plated at low density, and that the glial layer must be present at the time of neuronal plating rather than later during neuronal culture. Similar results were obtained using cultures of cerebral cortical (Figure 9) and striatal neurons (Figure 10).

The qualitative observation about neuronal survival was confirmed by quantitative analysis. Specifically, the number of surviving neurons at 14 DIV was counted, based on phase-contrast images of the cultures (Figure 11). The number was greatest for neurons cultured on a glial feeder layer (i.e., plated on the glial feeder layer). The number was lower in the case of neurons cultured in the absence of a glial feeder layer. The number was reduced even further when the cells were treated with AraC at a later time. These differences were statistically significant, and were noted in cultures of neurons obtained from all three brain regions.

The types of surviving cells were identified at 14 DIV in the mouse hippocampal cultures plated on the rat hippocampal feeder layer. Double-immunocytochemistry was performed using antibodies against the neuronal marker, microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), and the astrocytic glial cell marker, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). The cells with extended processes were positive for MAP2, whereas the cells in the underlying glial feeder layer were positive for GFAP (two representative image fields, Figure 12A). This staining was not an artifact of a specific combination of primary and secondary antibodies, because the same pattern was obtained when a different set of secondary antibodies was used (Figure 12B).

In contrast, when the same staining was performed on the cultures consisting of only a glial feeder layer, i.e., in the absence of added mouse cells (two representative image fields, Figure 13A), no cells were positive for MAP2. The cells of the feeder layer were consistently positive for GFAP. For a negative control, both primary antibodies were omitted from the immunocytochemical procedure (Figure 13B). No staining was detected in these samples, although cells were present, as evident from the transmitted light optics (differential interference contrast, DIC) and nuclear staining with Hoechst dye. Thus, non-specific staining in the MAP2 and GFAP channels was very weak.

These immunocytochemical data were also analyzed quantitatively (Figure 14). In each 8-bit image, intensity was measured and plotted along a line. Overlaid plots reveal MAP2 staining when mouse cells (samples containing neurons) were cultured on a glial feeder layer (Neuron +, glia +, primary antibody (1° Ab) +), whereas such staining was absent in cultures of glial feeder cells alone (Neuron −, glia +, 1° Ab +). In a negative control without primary antibodies, staining was negligible in cultures of glial feeder cells alone (Neuron −, glia +, 1° Ab −). GFAP staining was apparent in the glial feeder layer, regardless of whether mouse cells were plated (Neuron +, glia +, 1° Ab +) or not (Neuron −, glia +, 1° Ab +). Again, staining in the negative control was negligible (Neuron −, glia +, 1° Ab −). These results show that the rat glial feeder layer was composed mostly of astrocytes, and that the neurons were present only when mouse cells were added. They also indicate that the neurons present in these cultures originated solely from mouse.

The Results Section of the online video also shows the DIC and MAP2 images of cultured neurons plated on a glial feeder layer, both prepared from the CA3-CA1 hippocampal region of wild-type mice.

For detailed control of cell culture, it is recommended to measure the density of live cells, both for assessing the general quality of the brain dissection and cellular dissociation steps, and for plating the cells at the pre-determined density. Listed below are four sets of typical density measurements. Note, however, that these numbers can vary depending on culture conditions and reagents. For example, even different lots of serum from the same vendor can affect the results. Thus, these numbers should be considered a general indicator, rather than an absolute guideline.

For cellular dissociation (step 3.1.13), typical values for the live-cell density obtained from one pup are: ~2 x 105 cells/ml (mouse motor cortex and mouse CA3-CA1 hippocampus), ~5 x 105 cells/ml (mouse cerebral cortex and rat CA3-CA1 hippocampus), and ~1 x 106 cells/ml (mouse striatum). In all these cases, the fractions of live cells were >90% (viability, defined as the ratio of the number of live cells to that of the total number of cells). The motor cortex is loosely defined as the region of the cerebral cortex that lies immediately dorsal to the striatum 20. For hippocampal cultures, the CA3 and CA1 regions of the hippocampus proper are preferred. The whole hippocampus additionally includes the dentate gyrus, the inclusion of which leads to formation of large nerve terminals of granule cells and introduces heterogeneity in synaptic properties 21. The striatal culture includes the caudate-putamen and globus pallidus, but does not include the nucleus accumbens, or medial or lateral septal nuclei in the nearby structures.

For mouse glial culture (step 3.2.11), the plating density is ~10,000 glial cells on each 12-mm round coverslip, using ~50 μl of cell suspension at a density of ~2 x 105 cells/ml. Usually the density measured in the supernatant is relatively constant and does not require adjustment. To convert the density over different areas, the useful information is that the coverslip has a diameter of 1.20 cm and an area of 1.13 cm2. Thus, ~10,000 cells / coverslip = ~8,800 cells / cm2 on a coverslip.

For rat glial culture (step 3.3.12), the plating density is ~1,000 glial cells on each 12-mm round coverslip, using ~100 µl of cell suspension at a density of ~1×104 cells/ml. Thus, 1,000 cells/coverslip = ~900 cells/cm2 on a coverslip.

For low-density mouse neuronal culture (step 3.4.4), the plating density ranges between 2,000 and 48,000 cells per well of a 24-well plate. Typical values when plating neurons on rat glial cells are: 10,000-24,000 cells/well for cerebral cortical neurons, 12,000-24,000 cells/well for CA3-CA1 hippocampal neurons and 24,000-48,000 cells/well for striatal neurons. When plating on mouse glial cells, the number is reduced, e.g., 2,000 cells/well for CA3-CA1 hippocampal neurons. As a side note, for plating rat CA3-CA1 hippocampal neurons on a rat glial feeder layer, the plating density is 1,000-6,000 cells/well. For converting the density in a well to the density on a coverslip, the useful information is that the internal well diameter at the bottom is 1.56 cm and its area is 1.91 cm2. Thus, for example, 12,000 cells/well = 7,100 cells / coverslip = 6,300 cells/cm2 on a coverslip. These densities were chosen with the aim of culturing relatively sparse neurons for high-resolution cellular imaging. Researchers should choose their numbers that best suit their experimental aims.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Tattooed paw pads of mice. Newborn mice were labeled by tattooing the paw pads. They were photographed immediately after tattooing (newborn), at 3 weeks of age (3-week-old) and at 32 weeks of age (32-week-old). The labels remained easily visible throughout adulthood. Images were taken from different animals. They are not shown at the same scale. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Genotyping of wild-type (Tor1a+/+), heterozygous (Tor1a+/ΔE) and homozygous (Tor1aΔE/ΔE) ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice. The Tor1a gene alleles were analyzed in wild-type and mutant forms, using DNA extracted from the tails of newborn pups. Tail tips were ~4 mm in length. DNA was stained using SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain. See the Table of Materials/Equipment for the information about the primers and thermal cycling program for Tor1a gene. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Detection of genomic DNA in the context of variation in the amount of starting material. Tail tips of different lengths were used. Tested animals were 3-week-old, heterozygous ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice (Tor1a+/ΔE). Lanes represent the tail lengths of 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm, in duplicate (from left). The tail tips were obtained from different mice. Molecular-weight size markers in the leftmost lane represent DNA lengths in steps of 100 base pairs. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Detection of genomic DNA in the context of variation in animal age. (A) Tor1a gene. Lanes represent tail tips obtained from heterozygous ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice (Tor1a+/ΔE) at the following stages: newborn, 3-week-old, and ~24-week-old (in duplicates from left). (B) Tfap2a gene. Lanes represent tail tips obtained from wild-type (Tfap2a+/+) mice at the following stages: newborn, 3-week-old, and ~24-week-old (in duplicates from left). Both genes were amplified from tails ~4 mm in length. The expected PCR fragment is 498 bp. The PCR program was the same as that used for Tor1a gene. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Detection of genomic DNA in the context of variation in length of the PCR amplicon. The Tfap2a gene was analyzed with PCR amplicon lengths of 498 bp (left lanes), 983 bp (middle lanes) and 1990 bp (right lanes) in duplicates. The gene was amplified from tails of 3-week-old mice. Molecular-weight size markers in the leftmost and rightmost lanes of the gel represent DNA lengths in steps of 100 and 200 base pairs, respectively. See the Table of Materials/Equipment for information about the primers for different amplicons. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Detection of genomic DNA in the context of variation in DNA extraction method. Outcomes for the manual, single-tube extraction (Manual) and the automated, parallel multi-tube extraction methods (Auto) are compared. The latter method was used throughout this report. Genes were amplified from tails ~4 mm in length, collected from newborns. (A) Tor1a gene in the newborn pups of ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice. Lanes represent DNAs extracted from wild-type (manual and automated), heterozygous (manual and automated), and homozygous mice (manual and automated) (from left). (B) Tfap2a gene in 3-week-old wild-type mice. The expected PCR fragment is 498 bp. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7
Figure 7. Simplified, schematic illustration of procedures for plating mouse neurons on mouse (A) and rat (B) glial feeder layers. The numbers of days (days in vitro) refer to the cumulative days after the glial cells are first plated in culture flasks. They serve only as a rough estimate. For practical details, see the Procedures section. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8
Figure 8. Supportive effect of glial feeder layer on growth of hippocampal neurons in a low-density culture. Neurons were obtained from the CA3-CA1 region of the hippocampus of newborn, wild-type mice. (A) Mouse hippocampal cells were plated on coated glass coverslips, which had been pre-seeded with a rat glial feeder layer obtained from the CA3-CA1 region of hippocampus. Neurons were dispersed evenly in a healthy manner. Cultures were observed at 3, 7 and 14 DIV. (B, C) Mouse hippocampal cells were plated on coated glass coverslips, which had no pre-established feeder layer. Cultures were observed at 3 DIV (top panel in B) and 7 DIV (middle panel in C) without AraC treatment. In other sets of cultures, the cells were treated with AraC at 3 DIV (bottom panel in B) and 7 DIV (bottom panel in C), and observed at 14 DIV. All images represent the sister cultures obtained from the same pup, whose neurons were plated on the same day. See text for details. For each panel, an example of a neuron is indicated by a white arrowhead and magnified in an inset. Neurons have cell bodies whose perimeter appears bright when viewed by phase-contrast optics, and they also have thick processes. Asterisks indicate areas without glial cells. The cultures were imaged live on an inverted microscope using phase-contrast optics with 20X objective lens (numerical aperture of 0.45) without an intermediate lens (i.e., at 1x). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9
Figure 9. Supportive effect of glial feeder layer on growth of cerebral cortical neurons in a low-density culture. Similar results as in Figure 8, but with neurons obtained from the motor region of cerebral cortex. The conditions under labels A-C correspond to those in Figure 8. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10
Figure 10. Supportive effect of glial feeder layer on growth of striatal neurons in a low-density culture. Similar results as in Figures 8 and 9, but with neurons obtained from the striatum. The conditions under labels A-C correspond to those in Figure 8. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 11
Figure 11. Supportive effect of glial feeder layer on neuronal survival. The number of surviving neurons was counted in the experiments shown in Figure 8, using images acquired by phase-contrast microscopy. Images for 14 DIV are shown here again, but with arrowheads pointing to examples of counted neurons. The bar graph shows the number of neurons per image field (449.0 μm x 335.5 μm) (mean ± standard error of the mean, n = 7-24 fields for each culture condition). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences of 'Glial feeder layer (-), AraC on 3 DIV' and 'Glial feeder layer (-), AraC on 7 DIV' from 'Glial feeder layer (+)' (* p <0.05, ** p <0.01, unpaired Student's t-test). The numbers above the bars indicate the neuronal density measured in montages of multiple image fields. Images were acquired using a 20X objective lens. To avoid acquisition bias, all images were acquired along a full vertical strip, from the top to the bottom of a coverslip and passing through the approximate center of the coverslip. Individual images had some overlap (e.g., 1/6 to 1/4 of an image field at the top and bottom). Two methods were used for the analysis. In one, neurons were counted in alternating images to ensure that individual neurons were not counted more than once. The resulting numbers were used to generate the bar graph. In the second method, a single montage was created from the individual images. They were stitched using the Microsoft Image Composite Editor or manually using Photoshop. The montages also excluded multiple counts of the same neurons. The resulting numbers are listed above the bars. In both methods, wide areas at the coverslip periphery that did not contain any cells were excluded. Cells were counted as neurons if they had cell bodies that appeared bright by phase-contrast microscopy, as well as extended cellular processes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 12
Figure 12. Immunocytochemical identification of cell types in neuronal cultures. The culture condition corresponds to the bottom-left image of Figure 8A. Neurons were obtained from the CA3-CA1 region of the hippocampus of wild-type mice, and plated on a glial feeder layer generated from the CA3-CA1 region of hippocampus of wild-type rats. The cultured cells were analyzed by immunocytochemistry for the neuronal marker MAP2, and the astrocytic glial cell marker GFAP. Differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy was used to reveal the general morphology of the imaged fields, 14-17 days after the neurons were plated on the glial feeder layer. (A) Three-color staining, including counterstaining with the nuclear marker Hoechst 33342 dye. Two representative image fields are shown. (B) Two-color staining, with different combinations of secondary antibodies conjugated with different fluorophores. In these experiments, the cultured cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 4% sucrose in Tyrode's solution (containing, in mM: 125 NaCl, 2 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 30 D-glucose, 25 HEPES, pH 7.4 adjusted with 5 M NaOH, ~310 mOsm without adjustment) for 30 min at 4 °C. After being washed with Tyrode's solution, they were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in Tyrode's solution for 10 min. They were again washed with Tyrode's solution and then blocked with 2% normal goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (blocking solution) for 60 min at RT. Thereafter they were treated with the rabbit polyclonal anti-MAP2 antibody (AB5622; 400x dilution in blocking solution), and mouse monoclonal anti-GFAP cocktail (NE1015; 1,000x dilution) O/N (15-21 hr) at 4 °C. Following washes with PBS, the cells were incubated with goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 405 (500x dilution in blocking solution), Alexa Fluor 488 (1,000x) or Alexa Fluor 568 dye (500x) for 60 min at RT. They were washed with PBS and observed directly in PBS. In some cultures, after the final wash in the above procedures, the cells were treated with Hoechst 33342 at 0.5 µg/ml in PBS for 10 min at RT, and washed with PBS before observation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 13
Figure 13. Immunocytochemical identification of cell types in glial feeder layer cultures. Sister cultures of the rat glial feeder layers as in Figure 12, but without the plating of mouse neurons. (A) Staining using the immunocytochemical procedures described in Figure 12A. Two representative image fields are shown. (B) Staining of the glial feeder layer using the immunocytochemical procedures described in A, but with the primary antibodies omitted. All MAP2 images in Figures 12A and 13A, B were acquired under the same imaging conditions, and are shown at the same image contrast to allow comparison of intensity. The same procedures were used for GFAP images in Figures 12A and 13A, B. The glial feeder layer culture was imaged on the same day as the cultures in Figure 12. Thus the glial feeder layers in Figures 12 and 13 were cultured in vitro for the same amount of time. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 14
Figure 14. Intensity of immunocytochemical staining. Lines were drawn on the images shown in Figures 12 and 13, and the intensity along these was plotted. Insets show images in the top row of Figure 12A. The three conditions were: 1) plating of mouse cells (containing neurons) on a rat feeder layer and staining with the primary antibodies (Neuron +, glia +, 1° Ab +), 2) glial feeder layer only (no neuronal plating) and staining with the primary antibodies (Neuron −, glia +, 1° Ab +), and 3) glial feeder layer only (no neuronal plating) and staining without primary antibodies (Neuron −, glia +, 1° Ab −). Neuronal staining (MAP2) was present only when mouse cells were plated (conditions 1 vs. 2), and glial staining (GFAP) was present in both sets of cultures (conditions 1 vs. 2). The immunocytochemical staining was specific to both primary antibodies (conditions 1 vs. 3). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

SOLUTIONS
TAE buffer (50x solution)
Tris base, 486 g 
Glacial acetic acid, 114.2 ml
0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0, 200 ml 
Add distilled water to bring total volume to 2 L
Make up in a chemical fume hood.
Dilute 50-fold before use.
Hanks' solution
Hanks' Balanced Salts, without calcium chloride, magnesium sulfate and sodium bicarbonate (for 1 L)
NaHCO3, 350 mg (final concentration 4.17 mM)
HEPES, 2.38 g (final concentration, 10 mM)
Adjust to pH 7.4 using 5 M NaOH. 
Adjust osmolarity to 310 mOsm using sucrose (Osmolarity tends to ~290 mOsm without any adjustment).
Add distilled water to bring total volume to 1 L
Digestion solution (for trypsin treatment of brain tissue)
NaCl, 800.6 mg (final concentration, 137 mM)
KCl, 37.3 mg (final concentration, 5 mM)
Na2HPO4·(7H2O), 187.6 mg (final concentration, 7 mM)
HEPES, 595.8 mg (final concentration, 25 mM)
Glucose, 97.3 mg (final concentration, 5.4 mM)
Adjust to pH 7.2 using 5 M NaOH.
Osmolarity tends to ~310 mOsm without any adjustment.
Add distilled water to bring total volume to 100 ml. 
Right before usage, add 20 mg of trypsin (final concentration of 10 mg/ml) and 20 μl of DNase (final concentration of 750 units/ml) to 2 ml of digestion solution.
Dissociation solution (for mechanical dissociation of brain tissue)
Hanks' solution 
MgSO4·(7H2O), 295.1 mg (final concentration, 11.97 mM)
Adjust osmolarity to 310 mOsm using sucrose.
Total volume is 100 ml.
Right before usage, add 20 μl of DNase (final concentration of 750 units/ml) to 2 ml of dissociation solution.
Plating medium-1 (for mouse glial cells)
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 449.5 ml 
MITO+ Serum Extender, 0.5 ml
FBS, 50 ml 
Total volume is 500 ml.
Plating medium-2 (for mouse neurons)
Neurobasal-A, 485 ml 
B27, 10 ml 
GlutaMAX-I, 5 ml (final concentration, 2 mM) 
Total volume is 500 ml.
Plating medium-3 (for rat neurons and glial cells)
Minimum Essential Media (MEM, without phenol red) 
Glucose, 2.5 g (final concentration, 27.8 mM)
NaHCO3, 100 mg (final concentration, 2.38 mM)
Transferrin, 50 mg 
FBS, 50 ml
GlutaMAX-I, 5 ml (final concentration, 2 mM)
Insulin, 12.5 mg 
Total volume is 500 ml.
Growth medium (for rat neurons and glial cells)
MEM (without phenol red)
Glucose, 2.5 g (final concentration, 27.8 mM)
NaHCO3, 100 mg (final concentration, 2.38 mM)
Transferrin, 50 mg
FBS, 25 ml
GlutaMAX-I, 1.25 ml (final concentration, 0.5 mM)
B27 or NS21 {Chen, 2008 #2399}, 10 ml
Cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside (AraC), 0.56 mg (final concentration, 4 µM)
Total volume is 500 ml.
General comments
Our culture media do not contain antibiotics because they could exert cytotoxic effects on cultured glial cells and neurons (reference 70, 71). This makes it especially important to adhere to sterile procedures in culture-related work.
See the Table of Reagents for the detailed sources of chemicals.

Table 1. Solutions

Discussion

The protocol presented here includes procedures for tattooing to label/identify mice, for genotyping mice from tail tips, and for culturing mouse brain neurons at low density. In one round of experiments using 6-8 pups, these procedures typically require ~0.5 hr, ~4 hr and ~2 hr, respectively, at a total of 6-7 hr. This makes it practical for a single experimenter to complete all the procedures necessary from the time of the pups' birth to the plating of neuronal cultures – in less than a single working day (with the exception of prior preparation of glial feeder layers).

Tattooing

Long-term identification of animals is necessary for the purposes of breeding and scientific studies such as analyses of histology, cell function and animal behavior. Tattooing newborn animals is advantageous because it can be carried out rapidly and lasts for much of the animal's life 7,22-25. Tattooing on the paw pads can be better than toe clipping 23 with respect to preserving testable behaviors, for example in suspension or gripping 22,26, although some studies have not noted such deficiencies (e.g., 25). There were no instances of mothers rejecting or cannibalizing pups after tattooing. For other methods of long-term identification of animals, see recent reviews 7,23,24.

Genotyping

A critical feature in our protocol is the use of a fast genotyping method. Although similar genotyping methods were described in previous reports (e.g., 27,28), the system described here has at least two improvements. First, it can tolerate certain variations in the amount of starting tissue, age of animals, and amplicon length. Thus, successful genotyping can be achieved using mice as young as 1 day and as old as 6 months old, and can be carried out using a broad range of primer pairs. Second, this method does not require a stop solution for the DNA extraction step. This eliminates excessive tube handling and pipetting, and allows parallel multi-tube automation of the process with a PCR machine. The number of specimens can be scaled up (e.g., 96 samples) yet processed easily and simultaneously. Also the specimen type is not limited to tail clips; other sample types that could be used include ear punches, toe clippings, whole early embryos, and placenta tissues 2-4,29,30. Different animal species can also be used. Thus the genotyping procedures are reliable (repeatable with low intra-assay variance) and reproducible (low inter-assay variance between runs or between laboratories), and have the advantage of high scalability.

Note that some caution is required for achieving the expected quality of results. First, during DNA extraction, a large variation in the protocol can degrade the results. For example, a significant reduction in the volume of DNA Extraction Solution (e.g., from 200 to 100 µl in step 2.2) still allows genotyping, but it can reduce the reliability and result in variation in PCR results. Under such conditions, it is recommended to reduce the volume of the DNA extract from 4 to 2 µl, and increase the volume of H2O from 2 to 4 µl to compensate for the volume change during PCR reactions (step 2.5). Second, at the end of DNA extraction, the solution can be used for PCR immediately without centrifugation in most cases, although the tail will retain its overall structure and will not be completely decomposed. However, the described inversion of the tubes is essential for the purpose of dissociating genomic DNA from the tissue (step 2.4). It is also important to use the top, clear part of the solution, excluding the debris at the bottom of the tube, because inclusion of the latter will lead to inconclusive PCR results. These steps will be effective with minimal time and effort. Equally good results can be obtained by actively vortexing the specimen (in place of the inversions) followed by centrifugation and usage of the supernatant. Third, after the DNA extraction, the DNA can be stored for long-term (e.g., >two weeks). It is recommended to centrifuge the solution using a microcentrifuge (e.g., 3,000-13,000 g at 4 °C for 2 min), transfer the supernatants to new tubes, and store them at -80 °C. When the stored extract is to be used for genotyping, briefly centrifuge the specimen after thawing, and use the supernatant.

Neuronal cultures

Another critical feature of our protocol is the use of a glial feeder layer to establish neuronal cultures at a low plating density. Typically, in primary cultures of mammalian brain neurons, the cells are plated with a relatively high density, on coated coverslips without a glial feeder layer (e.g., 31-39). When the plating density of neurons is reduced using this method, the initial lack of glial sheet leads to poor neuronal growth and dendritic extension (panels B, C in Figures 8-10), as reported previously 40-42, probably due to poor glial growth 43,44.

Successful, low-density neuronal cultures can be generated by at least three broad types of methods. In one approach, Neurobasal Medium is used as a culture medium. This makes it possible to culture neurons in the absence of a glial feeder layer, and can be used for low-density neuronal cultures 45,46. In a second approach ('Banker-type' and its modification), glial cells are co-cultured with neurons in the same well but are physically separated from them. In this context the glial cells provide 'trophic support' to neurons without contacting them directly 1,41,42,47-49. In the third approach, neurons are plated on a pre-established glial feeder layer that supports neuronal growth (e.g., 50-53) (Figures 8-10). Specifically, mouse brain neurons are plated on a glial feeder layer prepared from mice 8,34,54 or rats 41,55,56.

We prefer the last of the three approaches to low-density culture, because the Neurobasal Medium can affect neuronal survival 57, the astrocytic glial cells will be essential in regulating neuronal functions 8,58, and the physical contact between neurons and glial cells may be important. The procedures for culturing the mouse and rat glial cells are similar 59,60, but we have modified them slightly to accommodate for the more rapid in vitro growth of rat vs. mouse glial cells. The procedures for the rat cell culture were modified from 61-63. The use of a glial feeder layer for low-density neuronal cultures makes it necessary to perform rapid genotyping, in order to match the genotype of the feeder layer to that of the neurons within the period between the pups' births and the neonatal deaths or the end of culture window (1-2 postnatal days).

Low-density culture on a glial feeder layer is also an important method when one tries to culture neurons of small nuclei in the brain (e.g., the norepinephrine-releasing locus coeruleus, and the dopamine-releasing substantia nigra). Those nuclei contain only a small number of neurons and would inevitably yield low-density cultures 64-67.

Primary cultures are routinely prepared in our laboratory from the CA3-CA1 region of hippocampus, the motor region of the cerebral cortex and the striatum of mice. The same procedures can be used to prepare neuronal cultures representing other brain regions, for example the whole hippocampus (including the dentate gyrus) and the whole cerebral cortex. Rat neurons from brain regions such as the hippocampus and the locus coeruleus are cultured in similar fashion, using the rat glial feeder layer. These cultured neurons are usually used at 1-4 weeks in vitro, with the exact age of the culture depending on the purpose of the experiment. It is of note that some neurons cultured on a glial feeder layer can survive for more than 10 weeks 34,68.

One potential problem of low-density neuronal cultures is that the neuronal properties can be different from those in high-density cultures or in neurons in situ. Comparison of these systems provides an interesting opportunity to study how neuronal development and maturation are affected by multiple factors, such as the neuronal density, the soluble factors secreted from neurons, neuron-to-neuron contact, and glial-neuronal interactions.

In summary, the tattooing-based mouse labeling is long lasting, the genotyping method is rapid, and the culture method allows for plating mouse neurons at low density. The protocol described here can be applied in its entirety to other animal species harboring other genetic mutations. Moreover, individual steps of the protocol can be used for other purposes. Thus the protocol can be used in a wide array of applications based on experimenters' needs.

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank researchers at the University of Iowa, Drs. Luis Tecedor, Ines Martins and Beverly Davidson for instructions and helpful comments regarding striatal cultures, and Drs. Kara Gordon, Nicole Bode and Pedro Gonzalez-Alegre for genotyping assistance and discussions. We also thank Dr. Eric Weyand (Animal Identification and Marking Systems) for helpful comments regarding tattooing, and Dr. Shutaro Katsurabayashi (Fukuoka University) for helpful comments regarding the mouse culture. This work was supported by grants from the American Heart Association, the Department of Defense (Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program award W81XWH-14-1-0301), the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation, the Edward Mallinckrodt, Jr. Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and the Whitehall Foundation (N.C.H.).

Materials

REAGENTS – tattooing
Machine Cleanser Animal Identification and Marking Systems, Inc. NMCR3 This is used to clean the needles and the holder after tattooing.
Machine Drying Agent Animal Identification and Marking Systems, Inc. NDAR4 This is used to dry the needles and holder after cleaning.
Neonate Tattoo Black Pigment Animal Identification and Marking Systems, Inc. NBP01
Skin Prep Applicator Animal Identification and Marking Systems, Inc. NSPA1 Q-tip.
Skin Prep solution Animal Identification and Marking Systems, Inc. NSP01 This reagent delivers a thin layer of oil that enhances the efficiency of tattooing and prevents tattoo fading, by (information from vendor): 1) preventing non-tattooed skin from being stained temporarily, thereby allowing the quality of a paw pad tattoo to be easily evaluated before the pup is returned to its home cage – the stained skin surface can be confused with the tattooed skin, 2) reducing skin damage during tattooing – softening the skin and lubricating the needle will help the needle penetrate the skin without causing skin damage, and 3) preventing molecular oxygen from entering the skin, thereby reducing inflammatory responses to reactive oxygen species that can be generated.
REAGENTS – genotyping
EZ Fast Tissue/Tail PCR Genotyping Kit (Strip Tube Format) EZ BioResearch LLC G2001-100
2X PCR Ready Mix II EZ BioResearch LLC G2001-100 A red, loading dye for electrophoresis is included in the 2X PCR Ready Mix solution.
Tissue Lysis Solution A EZ BioResearch LLC G2001-100 Prepare DNA Extraction Solution by mixing 20 µl of Tissue Lysis Solution A and 180 µl of Tissue Lysis Solution B per specimen.
Tissue Lysis Solution B EZ BioResearch LLC G2001-100 Prepare DNA Extraction Solution by mixing 20 µl of Tissue Lysis Solution A and 180 µl of Tissue Lysis Solution B per specimen.
Acetic acid, glacial VWR BDH 3092
Agarose optimized grade, molecular biology grade rpi A20090-500  We use 2% agarose gels in TAE buffer containing the SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (diluted 10,000-fold) or ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml gel volume).
Ethidium bromide Sigma-Aldrich E7637-1G
Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, disodium salt dihydrate (EDTA) Fisher BP120-500
Filtered Pipet Tips, Aerosol-Free, 0.1-10 µl Dot Scientific Inc UG104-96RS  Use pipette tips that are sterile and free of DNA, RNase and DNase. For all steps involving DNA, use filtered pipette tips to avoid cross-contamination.
Filtered Pipet Tips, Premium Fit Filter Tips, 0.5-20 µl Dot Scientific Inc UG2020-RS Use pipette tips that are sterile and free of DNA, RNase and DNase. For all steps involving DNA, use filtered pipette tips to avoid cross-contamination.
Filtered Pipet Tips, Premium Fit Filter Tips, 1-200 µl Dot Scientific Inc UG2812-RS Use pipette tips that are sterile and free of DNA, RNase and DNase. For all steps involving DNA, use filtered pipette tips to avoid cross-contamination.
Molecular weight marker, EZ DNA Even Ladders 100 bp EZ BioResearch LLC L1001 We use either of these three molecular weight markers.
Molecular weight marker, EZ DNA Even Ladders 1000 bp EZ BioResearch LLC L1010
Molecular weight marker, TrackIt, 100 bp DNA Ladder GIBCO-Invitrogen 10488-058
PCR tubes, 8-tube strips with individually attached dome top caps, natural, 0.2 ml  USA Scientific 1402-2900 Use tubes that are sterile and free of DNA, RNase and DNase. An 8-tube strip is easy to handle and to group the specimens than individual tubes.
PCR tubes, Ultraflux Individual  rpi 145660 Use tubes that are sterile and free of DNA, RNase and DNase.
Seal-Rite 0.5 ml microcentrifuge tube, natural USA Scientific 1605-0000 Use tubes that are sterile and free of DNA, RNase and DNase.
SYBR Safe DNA gel stain * 10,000x concentration in DMSO GIBCO-Invitrogen S33102
Tris base rpi T60040-1000
Primers for amplifying Tor1a gene in ΔE-torsinA knock-in mice 5'-AGT CTG TGG CTG GCT CTC CC-3' (forward) and 5'-CCT CAG GCT GCT CAC AAC CAC-3' (reverse) (reference 18). These primers were used at a final concentration of 1.0 ng/µl (~0.16 µM) (reference 2).
Primers for amplifying Tfap2a gene in wild-type mice 5'-GAA AGG TGT AGG CAG AAG TTT GTC AGG GC-3' (forward), 5'-CGT GTG GCT GTT GGG GTT GTT GCT GAG GTA-3' (reverse) for the 498-bp amplicon, 5'-CAC CCT ATC AGG GGA GGA CAA CTT TCG-3' (forward), 5'-AGA CAC TCG GGC TTT GGA GAT CAT TC-3' (reverse) for the 983-bp amplicon, and 5'-CAC CCT ATC AGG GGA GGA CAA CTT TCG-3' (forward), 5'-ACA GTG TAG TAA GGC AAA GCA AGG AG-3' (reverse) for the 1990-bp amplicon. These primers are used at 0.5 µM.
REAGENTS – cell culture
5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine Sigma-Aldrich F0503-100MG See comments section of uridine for more information.
B-27 supplement GIBCO-Invitrogen 17504-044
Cell Culture Dishes 35 x 10 mm Dishes, Tissue Culture-treated BD falcon 353001
Cell Culture Flasks, T25, Tissue Culture-treated, Canted-neck, plug-seal cap, 25 cm2 Growth Area, 70 ml BD falcon 353082
Cell Culture Flasks, T75, Tissue Culture-treated, Canted-neck, vented cap, 75 cm2 Growth Area, 250 ml BD falcon 353136
Conical Tube, polypropylene, 15 ml BD falcon 352095
Countess (cell number counter) chamber slides GIBCO-Invitrogen C10312
Cytosine β-D-Arabinofuranoside hydrochloride (Ara-C hydrochloride) Sigma-Aldrich C6645-100mg
D-(+)-Glucose (Dextrose) anhydrous, SigmaUltra, 99.5% (GC) Sigma-Aldrich G7528-250G
Dish, Petri glass 100 x 15 mm Pyrex 3160-101
Distilled water GIBCO-Invitrogen 15230-147
DNase Type II Sigma-Aldrich D4527-200KU Stock solution is prepared at 1500 units/20 μl = 75000 units/ml in distilled water.
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high glucose, GlutaMAX, pyruvate GIBCO-Invitrogen 10569-010, 500 ml
Fast PES Filter Unit, 250 ml, 50 mm diameter membrane, 0.2 µm Pore Size Nalgene 568-0020
Fast PES Filter Unit, 500 ml, 90 mm diameter membrane, 0.2 µm Pore Size Nalgene 569-0020
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) GIBCO-Invitrogen 26140-079
Glass coverslip, 12 mm Round, thickness 0.09–0.12 mm, No. 0 Carolina 633017
GlutaMAX-I GIBCO-Invitrogen 35050-061
Hanks' Balanced Salts Sigma-Aldrich H2387-10X
HEPES, ≥99.5% (titration) Sigma-Aldrich H3375-250G
Hydrochloric acid, 37%, A.C.S reagent Sigma-Aldrich 258148-100 ML
Insulin Sigma-Aldrich I5500-250 mg
Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, MgSO4•(7H2O), BioUltra, ≥99.5% (Fluka) Sigma-Aldrich 63138-250G
Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix solution, Phenol Red-Free BD Biosciences 356237 This is the coating material for coverslips and flasks. 1) To prepare it, thaw the Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix solution on ice, which usually takes ~1 day. Using a pre-cooled pipette, aliquot the thawed solution into pre-cooled T25 flasks on ice, and store the flasks at -20°C. To prepare the working Matrigel solution, thaw the aliquotted Matrigel in a flask on ice, dilute 50-fold by adding pre-cooled MEM solution and keep the diluted solution at 4°C. It is important to pre-cool all cultureware and media that come into contact with Matrigel, except during and after the coating of coverslips, to prevent it from prematurely forming a gel. 2) To coat the glass coverslips or culture flasks with Matrigel, apply the Matrigel solution to the surface. Before plating cells, it is important to completely dry up the surface. For this purpose, it might be helpful to aspirate Matrigel during the cellular centrifugation immediately before plating the cells and to allow enough time for drying.
Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) GIBCO-Invitrogen 51200-038
MITO+ Serum Extender, 5 ml BD Biosciences 355006
Multiwell Plates, Tissue Culture-treated 24-well plate BD falcon 353047
Multiwell Plates, Tissue Culture-treated 6-well plate BD falcon 353046
Neurobasal-A Medium (1X), liquid GIBCO-Invitrogen 10888-022
Nitric Acid VWR bdh 3044
NS (Neuronal Supplement) 21  prepared in the lab Source: reference 69
Pasteur pipets, 5 ¾”  Fisher 13-678-6A Use this cotton-plugged 5 ¾” Pasteur pipette for cellular trituration. Fire-polish the tip beforehand to smooth the cut surface and to reduce the internal diameter to 50-80% of the original. Too small a tip will disrupt the cells and reduce cell viability, but too large a tip will decrease the efficiency of trituration.
Pasteur pipets, 9”  Fisher 13-678-6B
Potassium chloride (KCl), SigmaUltra, ≥99.0% Sigma-Aldrich P9333-500G
Serological pipet, 2 ml BD falcon 357507
Serological pipet, 5 ml  BD falcon 357543
Serological pipet, 10 ml BD falcon 357551
Serological pipet, 25 ml BD falcon 357525
Serological pipet, 50 ml  BD falcon 357550
Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, Sodium hydrogen carbonate), SigmaUltra, ≥99.5% Sigma-Aldrich S6297-250G
Sodium chloride (NaCl), SigmaUltra, ≥99.5% Sigma-Aldrich S7653-250G
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), pellets, 99.998% trace metals basis Sigma-Aldrich 480878-250G
Sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate (Na2HPO4•(7H2O)), ≥99.99%, Aldrich Sigma-Aldrich 431478-250G
Sucrose, SigmaUltra, ≥99.5% (GC) Sigma-Aldrich S7903-250G
Syringe filter, sterile, 0.2 µm Corning 431219
Syringe, 3 ml BD falcon 309585
Transferrin, Holo, bovine plasma Calbiochem 616420
Trypan Blue stain, 0.4% GIBCO-Invitrogen T10282 This is used for counting live/dead cells. Renew an old trypan blue solution if it is re-used many times (e.g. several times a week for several weeks), because it will form precipitates and result in erroneous readouts of cellular density.
Trypsin, type XI Sigma-Aldrich T1005-5G
Trypsin-EDTA solution, 0.25%  GIBCO-Invitrogen 25200-056
Uridine Sigma-Aldrich U3003-5G Stock solution is prepared at 50-mg 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine and 125-mg uridine in 25 ml DMEM (8.12 and 20.48 mM, respectively).
REAGENTS – immunocytochemistry
Antibody, rabbit polyclonal anti-MAP2 Merck Millipore AB5622
Antibody, mouse monoclonal anti-GFAP cocktail Merck Millipore NE1015
DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Referenzen

  1. Goslin, K., Asmussen, H., Banker, G., Banker, G., Goslin, K. Ch. 13. Culturing Nerve Cells. , 339-370 (1998).
  2. Kakazu, Y., Koh, J. Y., Ho, K. W., Gonzalez-Alegre, P., Harata, N. C. Synaptic vesicle recycling is enhanced by torsinA that harbors the DYT1 dystonia mutation. Synapse. 66, 453-464 (2012).
  3. Kakazu, Y., Koh, J. Y., Iwabuchi, S., Gonzalez-Alegre, P., Harata, N. C. Miniature release events of glutamate from hippocampal neurons are influenced by the dystonia-associated protein torsinA. Synapse. 66, 807-822 (2012).
  4. Iwabuchi, S., Kakazu, Y., Koh, J. Y., Harata, N. C. Abnormal cytoplasmic calcium dynamics in central neurons of a dystonia mouse model. Neurosci. Lett. 548, 61-66 (2013).
  5. Koh, J. Y., Iwabuchi, S., Harata, N. C. Dystonia-associated protein torsinA is not detectable at the nerve terminals of central neurons. Neurowissenschaften. 253C, 316-329 (2013).
  6. Iwabuchi, S., Koh, J. Y., Wang, K., Ho, K. W., Harata, N. C. Minimal change in the cytoplasmic calcium dynamics in striatal GABAergic neurons of a DYT1 dystonia knock-in mouse model. PLoS One. 8, e80793 (2013).
  7. Dahlborn, K., Bugnon, P., Nevalainen, T., Raspa, M., Verbost, P., Spangenberg, E. Report of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations Working Group on animal identification. Lab. Anim. 47, 2-11 (2013).
  8. Kawano, H., et al. Long-term culture of astrocytes attenuates the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles. PLoS One. 7, e48034 (2012).
  9. Ozelius, L. J., et al. The early-onset torsion dystonia gene (DYT1) encodes an ATP-binding protein. Nat. Genet. 17, 40-48 (1997).
  10. Hanson, P. I., Whiteheart, S. W. AAA+ proteins: have engine, will work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 519-529 (2005).
  11. White, S. R., Lauring, B. AAA+ ATPases: achieving diversity of function with conserved machinery. Traffic. 8, 1657-1667 (2007).
  12. Burdette, A. J., Churchill, P. F., Caldwell, G. A., Caldwell, K. A. The early-onset torsion dystonia-associated protein, torsinA, displays molecular chaperone activity in vitro. Cell Stress Chaperones. 15, 605-617 (2010).
  13. Zhao, C., Brown, R. S., Chase, A. R., Eisele, M. R., Schlieker, C. Regulation of Torsin ATPases by LAP1 and LULL1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, E1545-1554 (2013).
  14. Ozelius, L. J., Lubarr, N., Bressman, S. B. Milestones in dystonia. Mov. Disord. 26, 1106-1126 (2011).
  15. Albanese, A., et al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov. Disord. 28, 863-873 (2013).
  16. Goodchild, R. E., Kim, C. E., Dauer, W. T. Loss of the dystonia-associated protein torsinA selectively disrupts the neuronal nuclear envelope. Neuron. 48, 923-932 (2005).
  17. Dang, M. T., et al. Generation and characterization of Dyt1 ΔGAG knock-in mouse as a model for early-onset dystonia. Exp. Neurol. 196, 452-463 (2005).
  18. Tanabe, L. M., Martin, C., Dauer, W. T. Genetic background modulates the phenotype of a mouse model of DYT1 dystonia. PLoS One. 7, e32245 (2012).
  19. Huang, Z., Xu, H., Sandell, L. Negative regulation of chondrocyte differentiation by transcription factor AP-2α. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19, 245-255 (2004).
  20. Hall, R. D., Lindholm, E. P. Organization of motor and somatosensory neocortex in the albino rat. Brain Res. 66, 23-38 (1974).
  21. Kavalali, E. T., Klingauf, J., Tsien, R. W. Activity-dependent regulation of synaptic clustering in a hippocampal culture system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 12893-12900 (1999).
  22. Iwaki, S., Matsuo, A., Kast, A. Identification of newborn rats by tattooing. Lab. Anim. 23, 361-364 (1989).
  23. Wang, L. A primer on rodent identification methods. Lab. Anim. 34, 64-67 (2005).
  24. Deacon, R. M. Housing, husbandry and handling of rodents for behavioral experiments). Nat. Protoc. 1, 936-946 (2006).
  25. Castelhano-Carlos, M. J., Sousa, N., Ohl, F., Baumans, V. Identification methods in newborn C57BL/6 mice: a developmental and behavioural evaluation. Lab. Anim. 44, 88-103 (2010).
  26. Schaefer, D. C., Asner, I. N., Seifert, B., Burki, K., Cinelli, P. Analysis of physiological and behavioural parameters in mice after toe clipping as newborns. Lab. Anim. 44, 7-13 (2010).
  27. Doan, L., Monuki, E. S. Rapid genotyping of mouse tissue using Sigma’s Extract-N-Amp Tissue PCR. Kit. J. Vis. Exp. , e626 (2008).
  28. Chum, P. Y., Haimes, J. D., Andre, C. P., Kuusisto, P. K., Kelley, M. L. Genotyping of plant and animal samples without prior DNA purification. J. Vis. Exp. , e3844 (2012).
  29. Demeestere, I., et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone accelerates mouse oocyte development in vivo. Biol. Reprod. 87 (3), 1-11 (2012).
  30. Warner, D. R., Wells, J. P., Greene, R. M., Pisano, M. M. Gene expression changes in the secondary palate and mandible of Prdm16-/- mice. Cell Tissue Res. 351, 445-452 (2013).
  31. Higgins, D., Banker, G., Banker, G., Goslin, K. Ch. 3. Culturing Nerve Cells. , 37-78 (1998).
  32. Ahlemeyer, B., Baumgart-Vogt, E. Optimized protocols for the simultaneous preparation of primary neuronal cultures of the neocortex, hippocampus and cerebellum from individual newborn (P0.5) C57Bl/6J mice. J. Neurosci. Methods. 149, 110-120 (2005).
  33. Nunez, J. Primary culture of hippocampal neurons from P0 newborn rats. J. Vis. Exp. e895. (19), e895 (2008).
  34. Viesselmann, C., Ballweg, J., Lumbard, D., Dent, E. W. Nucleofection and primary culture of embryonic mouse hippocampal and cortical neurons. J. Vis. Exp. , e2373 (2011).
  35. Leach, M. K., et al. The culture of primary motor and sensory neurons in defined media on electrospun poly-L-lactide nanofiber scaffolds. J. Vis. Exp. , e2389 (2011).
  36. Beaudoin, G. M., et al. Culturing pyramidal neurons from the early postnatal mouse hippocampus and cortex. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1741-1754 (2012).
  37. Seibenhener, M. L., Wooten, M. W. Isolation and culture of hippocampal neurons from prenatal mice. J. Vis. Exp. , e3634 (2012).
  38. Pacifici, M., Peruzzi, F. Isolation and culture of rat embryonic neural cells: a quick protocol. J. Vis. Exp. , e3965 (2012).
  39. Tischbirek, C. H., et al. Use-dependent inhibition of synaptic transmission by the secretion of intravesicularly accumulated antipsychotic drugs. Neuron. 74, 830-844 (2012).
  40. Nakanishi, K., Nakanishi, M., Kukita, F. Dual intracellular recording of neocortical neurons in a neuron-glia co-culture system. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 4, 105-114 (1999).
  41. Kaech, S., Banker, G. Culturing hippocampal neurons. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2406-2415 (2006).
  42. Kaech, S., Huang, C. F., Banker, G. General considerations for live imaging of developing hippocampal neurons in culture. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2012 (3), 312-318 (2012).
  43. Song, H., Stevens, C. F., Gage, F. H. Astroglia induce neurogenesis from adult neural stem cells. Nature. 417, 39-44 (2002).
  44. Tang, X., et al. Astroglial cells regulate the developmental timeline of human neurons differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 11, 743-757 (2013).
  45. Ivkovic, S., Ehrlich, M. E. Expression of the striatal DARPP-32/ARPP-21 phenotype in GABAergic neurons requires neurotrophins in vivo and in vitro. J. Neurosci. 19, 5409-5419 (1999).
  46. Kaneko, A., Sankai, Y. Long-term culture of rat hippocampal neurons at low density in serum-free medium: combination of the sandwich culture technique with the three-dimensional nanofibrous hydrogel PuraMatrix. PLoS One. 9, e102703 (2014).
  47. Wang, X. F., Cynader, M. S. Effects of astrocytes on neuronal attachment and survival shown in a serum-free co-culture system. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 4, 209-216 (1999).
  48. Fath, T., Ke, Y. D., Gunning, P., Gotz, J., Ittner, L. M. Primary support cultures of hippocampal and substantia nigra neurons. Nat. Protoc. 4, 78-85 (2009).
  49. Shimizu, S., Abt, A., Meucci, O. Bilaminar co-culture of primary rat cortical neurons and glia. J. Vis. Exp. , e3257 (2011).
  50. Mennerick, S., Que, J., Benz, A., Zorumski, C. F. Passive and synaptic properties of hippocampal neurons grown in microcultures and in mass cultures. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 320-332 (1995).
  51. Chen, G., Harata, N. C., Tsien, R. W. Paired-pulse depression of unitary quantal amplitude at single hippocampal synapses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 1063-1068 (2004).
  52. Albuquerque, C., Joseph, D. J., Choudhury, P., MacDermott, A. B. Dissection, plating, and maintenance of dorsal horn neuron cultures. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, (2009).
  53. Xu, H. P., Gou, L., Dong, H. W. Study glial cell heterogeneity influence on axon growth using a new coculture method. J. Vis. Exp. , e2111 (2010).
  54. Daniel, J. A., Galbraith, S., Iacovitti, L., Abdipranoto, A., Vissel, B. Functional heterogeneity at dopamine release sites. J. Neurosci. 29, 14670-14680 (2009).
  55. Calakos, N., Schoch, S., Sudhof, T. C., Malenka, R. C. Multiple roles for the active zone protein RIM1α in late stages of neurotransmitter release. Neuron. 42, 889-896 (2004).
  56. Garcia-Junco-Clemente, P., et al. Cysteine string protein-α prevents activity-dependent degeneration in GABAergic synapses. J. Neurosci. 30, 7377-7391 (2010).
  57. Hogins, J., Crawford, D. C., Zorumski, C. F., Mennerick, S. Excitotoxicity triggered by Neurobasal culture medium. PLoS One. 6, e25633 (2011).
  58. Panatier, A., Vallee, J., Haber, M., Murai, K. K., Lacaille, J. C., Robitaille, R. Astrocytes are endogenous regulators of basal transmission at central synapses. Cell. 146, 785-798 (2011).
  59. Noble, M., Mayer-Proschel, M., Banker, G., Goslin, K. . Ch. 18. Culturing Nerve Cells. , 499-543 (1998).
  60. Ahlemeyer, B., Kehr, K., Richter, E., Hirz, M., Baumgart-Vogt, E., Herden, C. Phenotype, differentiation, and function differ in rat and mouse neocortical astrocytes cultured under the same conditions. J. Neurosci. Methods. 212, 156-164 (2013).
  61. Malgaroli, A., Tsien, R. W. Glutamate-induced long-term potentiation of the frequency of miniature synaptic currents in cultured hippocampal neurons. Nature. 357, 134-139 (1992).
  62. Ryan, T. A., Reuter, H., Wendland, B., Schweizer, F. E., Tsien, R. W., Smith, S. J. The kinetics of synaptic vesicle recycling measured at single presynaptic boutons. Neuron. 11, 713-724 (1993).
  63. Harata, N. C., Choi, S., Pyle, J. L., Aravanis, A. M., Tsien, R. W. Frequency-dependent kinetics and prevalence of kiss-and-run and reuse at hippocampal synapses studied with novel quenching methods. Neuron. 49, 243-256 (2006).
  64. Yamamoto, M., Steinbusch, H. W., Jessell, T. M. Differentiated properties of identified serotonin neurons in dissociated cultures of embryonic rat brain stem. J. Cell Biol. 91, 142-152 (1981).
  65. Nakajima, Y., Masuko, S. A technique for culturing brain nuclei from postnatal rats. Neurosci. Res. 26, 195-203 (1996).
  66. Arttamangkul, S., Torrecilla, M., Kobayashi, K., Okano, H., Williams, J. T. Separation of μ-opioid receptor desensitization and internalization: endogenous receptors in primary neuronal cultures. J. Neurosci. 26, 4118-4125 (2006).
  67. O’Farrell, C. A., Martin, K. L., Hutton, M., Delatycki, M. B., Cookson, M. R., Lockhart, P. J. Mutant torsinA interacts with tyrosine hydroxylase in cultured cells. Neurowissenschaften. 164, 1127-1137 (2009).
  68. Jiang, M., Deng, L., Chen, G. High Ca2+-phosphate transfection efficiency enables single neuron gene analysis. Gene Ther. 11, 1303-1311 (2004).
  69. Chen, Y., Stevens, B., Chang, J., Milbrandt, J., Barres, B. A., Hell, J. W. NS21: re-defined and modified supplement B27 for neuronal cultures. J. Neurosci. Methods. 171, 239-247 (2008).
  70. Robert, F., Hevor, T. K. Abnormal organelles in cultured astrocytes are largely enhanced by streptomycin and intensively by gentamicin. Neurowissenschaften. 144, 191-197 (2007).
  71. Robert, F., Cloix, J. F., Hevor, T. Ultrastructural characterization of rat neurons in primary culture. Neurowissenschaften. 200, 248-260 (2012).

Tags

GenotypingPrimary Neuronal CultureRapid GenotypingTattooingLow-density CultureDYT1 DystoniaHippocampusCerebral CortexStriatumNeuronal MorphologyNeuronal Function

Play Video
PDF
DOI
DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST
Diesen Artikel zitieren
Koh, J., Iwabuchi, S., Huang, Z., Harata, N. C. Rapid Genotyping of Animals Followed by Establishing Primary Cultures of Brain Neurons. J. Vis. Exp. (95), e51879, doi:10.3791/51879 (2015).
Zitat herunterladen
Nachdrucke und Berechtigungen

View Video

✖

To prove you're not a robot, please enter the text in the image below

CAPTCHA Image
Play CAPTCHA Audio
Refresh Image