Analysis of the Epithelial Damage Produced by <em>Entamoeba histolytica</em> Infection

Abigail Betanzos; Michael Schnoor; Rosario Javier-Reyna; Guillermina Garc&#237;a-Rivera; Cecilia Ba&#241;uelos; Jonnatan Pais-Morales; Esther Orozco

doi:10.3791/51668

JoVE Journal > Immunology and Infection

Immunologie und Infektion

Analysis of the Epithelial Damage Produced by Entamoeba histolytica Infection

Published: June 12, 2014

doi:

10.3791/51668

Abigail Betanzos¹, Michael Schnoor², Rosario Javier-Reyna¹, Guillermina García-Rivera¹, Cecilia Bañuelos³, Jonnatan Pais-Morales¹, Esther Orozco¹

¹Department of Infectomics and Molecular Pathogenesis,Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute, ²Department of Molecular Biomedicine,Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute, ³Agency for Knowledge Commercialization,Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute

Summary

Human infection by Entamoeba histolytica leads to amoebiasis, a major cause of diarrhea in tropical countries. Infection is initiated by pathogen interactions with intestinal epithelial cells, provoking the opening of cell-cell contacts and consequently diarrhea, sometimes followed by liver infection. This article provides a model to assess the early host-pathogen interactions to improve our understanding of amoebiasis pathogenesis.

Abstract

Entamoeba histolytica is the causative agent of human amoebiasis, a major cause of diarrhea and hepatic abscess in tropical countries. Infection is initiated by interaction of the pathogen with intestinal epithelial cells. This interaction leads to disruption of intercellular structures such as tight junctions (TJ). TJ ensure sealing of the epithelial layer to separate host tissue from gut lumen. Recent studies provide evidence that disruption of TJ by the parasitic protein EhCPADH112 is a prerequisite for E. histolytica invasion that is accompanied by epithelial barrier dysfunction. Thus, the analysis of molecular mechanisms involved in TJ disassembly during E. histolytica invasion is of paramount importance to improve our understanding of amoebiasis pathogenesis. This article presents an easy model that allows the assessment of initial host-pathogen interactions and the parasite invasion potential. Parameters to be analyzed include transepithelial electrical resistance, interaction of EhCPADH112 with epithelial surface receptors, changes in expression and localization of epithelial junctional markers and localization of parasite molecules within epithelial cells.

Introduction

Entamoeba histolytica is a single cell protozoan responsible of human amoebiasis, an intestinal infection causing inflammation and diarrhea. E. histolytica infects up to 50 million individuals yearly, but only about 10% of infected people develop the symptoms associated to amoebiasis¹. Infection occurs upon ingestion of contaminated food or water containing E. histolytica cysts. In the intestine, cysts produce live trophozoites that adhere to colon mucin and proliferate². Trophozoites usually form cysts that are excreted via stools. In other cases and for yet unknown reasons, trophozoites break the intestinal epithelial layer and invade underlying tissues. In worst cases, they enter the blood stream and affect other organs such as the liver³.

Breaking the epithelial barrier requires disruption of epithelial transmembranal structures that maintain cells joined. Epithelial cell contacts are formed by the apical junctional complex consisting of tight (TJ) and adherens junctions (AJ), and desmosomes⁴. The most apical junctions are TJ, and therefore, they are the first barrier affronted by E. histolytica and some other pathogens during host invasion. TJ are comprised of transmembranal adhesion receptors such as claudins, occludin and junctional adhesion molecules (JAM) that engage in homo- or heterophilic interactions with receptors of the neighboring cell. They are intracellularly bound by scaffold molecules of the zonula occludens (ZO) family that connect adhesion receptors to actin cytoskeleton to provide further mechanical strength to the epithelium. TJ are responsible for sealing intestinal tissue from the gut lumen, preventing excessive water and solute leakage. Thus, after TJ are disrupted by the parasite, tissues are invaded. E. histolytica secretes several molecules such as: (i) those involved in adhesion of amoebae to target cells⁵; (ii) membrane-active factors participating in killing of host cells by exocytosis, for example the ion channel-forming peptides termed amoebapores^6,7; and (iii) proteinases that degrade extracellular matrix proteins and mediate tissue disintegration^5,8,9.

The cysteine protease EhCP112 and the adhesion molecule EhADH112 that together form the EhCPADH112 complex are two E. histolytica virulence proteins that play a major role in the disassembly of TJ ¹⁰. Live trophozoites, their total lysates and secreted products induce molecular changes in the TJ complex and functional disturbance of the epithelial barrier. In this study, it is shown that EhCP112 and EhADH112 interact with occludin and claudin-1 proteins leading to internalization and degradation of cell proteins, thus facilitating E. histolytica entrance through the paracellular pathway.

Our data and those of other groups^11-17strongly suggest the necessity of specific host-pathogen interactions that allow parasite invasion. Unraveling the molecular basis of these interactions is of utmost importance for a better understanding of amoebiasis pathogenesis. Selective disturbance of TJ by trophozoites, characterized by increased paracellular permeability, can be measured by a decrease in transepithelial electrical resistance (TER). The transference of parasitic proteins towards host epithelia can be determined by immunofluorescence staining and confocal laser microscopy, a method that can also reveal co-localization of amoeba virulence factors with epithelial junctional markers indicating possible direct interactions. In this article, we describe in detail how epithelial cells and trophozoites are cultivated, harvested and manipulated to examine host-pathogen interactions and their consequences.

Protocol

1. Establishment and Maintenance of E. histolytica Cultures

Grow axenically (entirely free of all other contaminating organisms) 1 x 10⁵ trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica strain HMl:IMSS clone A¹⁸ in 16 x 125 mm culture tubes with Teflon liner screw caps (or 1 x 10⁶ trophozoites in a disposable T-25 flask) and 15 ml (or 50 ml in T-25 flask) of TYI-S-33 medium (TYI broth supplemented with 3% Diamond vitamin mixture, 10% heat inactivated adult bovine serum, 0.5 IU/ml penicillin and 35 µg/ml streptomycin)¹⁹ in an incubator at 37 °C.
Harvest trophozoites during the logarithmic growth phase usually at 48-96 hr intervals (Figure 1) by chilling the culture tubes for 5-10 min in an ice-water bath to release trophozoites attached to the glass culture tube.
Transfer the culture into a conical tube and invert it several times to disperse the cells. Determine cell number using a hemocytometer (Neubauer chamber), and transfer an inoculum into a culture tube containing fresh TYI-S-33 medium.
1. Use low numbers of amoebas for longer incubation periods (~3 x 10⁵ cells for ~5 days) and a higher number for shorter periods (~1 x 10⁶ cells for ~1 day). While counted inocula are desirable, established cultures become predictable so that estimated volumes of inocula are feasible.
2. Titrate the amount of trophozoites to optimize cell numbers for each experiment.
3. Maintain a parallel duplicate culture to have a back-up in case of inadvertent contamination or tube breakage.
Cap tubes tightly and incubate them at 37 °C in a 5° tilted horizontal angle.
Check cultures by visual inspection regularly, since an excessive growth of the culture may contain many lysed cells.

2. Establishment and Maintenance of MDCK Culture

Grow MDCK (Madin Darby Canine Kidney) cells type I (high resistance) in disposable T-75 flasks with 10 ml of DMEM media supplemented with penicillin (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 mg/ml), insulin (0.08 U/ml) and 10% neonate calf serum in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ and 95% air at 37 °C.
To split the cells, check them on an inverted microscope. Split cells when they are ~ 85-100% confluent.
Use a vacuum aspirator in a sterile hood and a sterile glass Pasteur pipette to remove media from the culture. To avoid scraping cells, turn the flask upside down and aspirate media from the bottom corner.
Dispense 10 ml of prewarmed PBS (140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na₂HPO₄, 1.8 mM KH₂PO₄, pH 7.4) into a T-75 flask (5 ml in the case of a T-25 flask) and gently rock the flask to wash the cells. Remove PBS by vacuum aspiration. Extensive washing is required since serum inhibits trypsin.
Dispense 1.5 ml of 0.05% trypsin into a T-75 flask (for T-25 flask use 0.5 ml) and gently rock the flask to cover the cell layer with trypsin.
Incubate for 5-10 min in the incubator (exact time depends on trypsin activity).
Check for cell detachment by holding flask against the light and look for flowing cells. Cell detachment (rounded cells) can also be checked using a microscope. Often, cells release faster with a quick, gentle slap to the side of the flask.
Add 15 ml of supplemented DMEM to a T-75 flask (5 ml for a T-25 flask). Resuspend cells by pipetting up and down 4 or 5 times.
To propagate cells, dilute cell suspension 1:5 with fresh supplemented DMEM. Cells number can also be determined at this point using a hemocytometer but this is usually only necessary if splitting cells into special formats for certain assays.

3. Preparation of Trophozoite Total Lysates

Detach trophozoites from culture tubes by chilling the tube for 5-10 min in an ice-water bath. Transfer the culture aseptically into a conical tube and centrifuge at 360 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. Carefully discard the supernatant by decantation, add ice-cold PBS to the pellet, invert the tube several times to disperse the cells and centrifuge again at 360 x g for 10 min. Repeat this step twice to remove all traces of TYI-S-33 medium.
Determine trophozoites number using a hemocytometer.
Lyse trophozoites by freeze-thaw cycles. Snap-freeze a measured inoculum of trophozoites (600,000 trophozoites/ml) diluted in ice-cold PBS, in liquid nitrogen for 1 min. Unfreeze the sample at 4 °C and vortex vigorously. Repeat freezing and thawing 3 times to complete cell lysis.
Activate proteases present in the lysates with 0.02% β-mercaptoethanol.

4. Preparation of Trophozoite Secreted Products

Perform steps 3.1 to 3.2.
Determine cells number and viability at this point using a hemocytometer and applying a trypan blue exclusion test²⁰:
1. Dilute 9 x 10⁶ trophozoites in 3 ml ice-cold PBS and transfer cells into a 50 ml conical tube. Take 10 µl of this suspension and add 1 µl of 0.4% trypan blue stock solution pH 7.2.
2. Use a Neubauer chamber to count cells at low magnification.
3. Count all cells and separate the number of blue cells, since blue cells have taken up the dye and must be considered dead.
4. Calculate the percentage of viable cells by dividing the number of viable cells by the total number of cells and multiplying by 100.
Transfer the conical tube containing the trophozoite suspension into the incubator at 37 °C for 2 hr in a 5° tilted horizontal angle.
To collect the secreted products, centrifuge tubes at 360 x g for 10 min. Use a disposable and sterile syringe and carefully collect the supernatant, avoiding contamination of samples with trophozoites from the pellet. Eliminate any transferred cells by passing the supernatant through a 0.22 μm cellulose acetate membrane. Activate proteases with 0.02% β-mercaptoethanol.
To discard putative unwanted contamination with molecules released from dead cells, reapply the trypan blue exclusion test for cell viability. Viable and total number of cells should be the same as obtained in step 4.2. If this is not the case, the collected supernatant may not only contain secreted proteins and should be discarded.

5. Interaction of MDCK Cells with Trophozoites, Trophozoite Lysates or Secreted Products

Incubate confluent MDCK cell monolayers with live trophozoites (an MDCK-to-amoeba ratio of 1:1), trophozoite lysates (an MDCK-to-amoeba ratio of 1:2) or secreted products (an MDCK-to-amoeba ratio of 1:10) at 37 °C for 2 and 30 min (Figure 2A).
Wash epithelial cells five times with ice-cold PBS to eliminate unbound molecules or trophozoites.

6. Preparation of Samples for Immunofluorescence

Culture MDCK cells on sterile glass coverslips placed inside a 24-multiwell cell culture dish. Inspect the cells on the inverted microscope until they reach 100% of confluence. Then, replace medium with 1 ml of fresh supplemented DMEM medium and transfer the plate to a 37 °C incubator for 24 hr more.
Remove the medium using a vacuum aspirator and a sterile glass Pasteur pipette and add 1 ml of warm PBS to each well. Remove PBS and repeat the wash with fresh PBS. Take care not to scrape cells from the bottom of the well with the glass pipette.
Add different conditions of trophozoites diluted in 1 ml of warm PBS: live trophozoites (T), trophozoite total lysates (TL) and secreted products (SP).
1. Put the culture plate in the incubator for 2 or 30 min.
2. Prepare two control conditions: one named time 0 min, where MDCK cells should be not incubated with E. histolytica but only with 1 ml of warm PBS; and another condition as secondary antibodies control, in this case incubate MDCK with T, TL or SP for 2 or 30 min and omit incubation with primary antibodies.
Wash epithelial cells five times with cold PBS to eliminate unbound molecules or trophozoites.
Fix and permeabilize the cells with 1 ml of 96% ethanol for 30 min at -20 °C.
To remove ethanol, perform three quick washes with 1 ml of PBS at room temperature.
Perform the following steps in a humid chamber to avoid drying of samples:
1. Use any available flat box that can be closed and filled with a wet paper towel on which samples can be safely placed. For example, an empty pipette tip box serves this purpose well.
2. Inside the chamber, evenly place a Parafilm layer and pipette 25 μl of blocking solution (0.5% BSA) for each coverslip.
3. Take coverslips out of the wells with fine forceps, carefully remove excess liquid from the edge with a filter paper and put coverslip into the drop containing blocking solution (0.5% BSA)with the cells facing the blocking solution. Incubate the samples for 1 hr at room temperature.
Prepare a mixture of primary antibodies in PBS: IgM mouse anti-EhCPADH112 (mα-EhCPADH112; 1:10 dilution) and IgG rabbit anti-ZO-1 (pα-ZO-1; 1:100 dilution).
Place a fresh sheet of Parafilm in the humid box and pipette 25 μl of antibodies solution for each coverslip.
Lift the coverslips from the blocking solution, dry any excess liquid at the edges using a filter paper, and place them into the drops with the cells facing the antibody solution. Incubate the samples overnight at 4 °C.
Put each coverslip into a well of a 24-multiwell (cell side on top) and add 1 ml of PBS.
1. Wash five times with 1 ml of PBS to remove unbound molecules.
Prepare a mixture of fluorescent secondary antibodies in PBS: goat anti-IgM mouse coupled to FITC (1:100 dilution) and goat anti-IgG rabbit coupled to TRITC (1:50 dilution).
Place a fresh sheet of Parafilm into the humid box and pipette 25 µl of the secondary antibodies solution for each coverslip.
Transfer the samples as in 6.10 and incubate for 1 hr at room temperature in the dark to avoid bleaching of the fluorescent dyes. Repeat step 6.11.1.
For nuclear staining, incubate for 3 min with 200 μl of 0.05 mM DAPI solution at room temperature and protect from light. Repeat step 6.11.1.
To conserve the fluorescent dyes, place the coverslips (cells facing down) into 5 μl Vecta Shield antifade mounting solution on glass microscope slides. Seal the cover slips using nail polish to avoid sample drying.
For long term storage, keep slides in a microscope slide box at -20 °C.
Analyze preparations by confocal microscopy through Z-stack sections and xz-planes (Figure 2A).

7. Incubation of Trophozoites with Protease Inhibitors or Specific Antibody

Repeat steps 3.1 to 3.2. For each experimental condition, incubate 1 x 10⁵ trophozoites (resuspended in 50 μl PBS) with protease inhibitors (1 mM Complete and 40 µg/ml E-64) or 30 µg monoclonal antibody against EhCPADH112 (mαEhCPADH112)²¹ for 20 min at 4 °C (Figure 2B). Use these preparations for co-incubation assays as described in step 8.5.

8. Measurement of Transepithelial Electrical Resistance (TER)

Culture MDCK cells on sterile transwell permeable supports (0.4 μm pore size). In the upper compartment, place 100 μl of cellular suspension and in the lower compartment place 600 μl of supplemented DMEM medium.
1. Check the medium level periodically. Fresh medium can be added as required.
2. Inspect the cells on an inverted microscope until they reach 100% of confluence. Change medium every 2-3 days.
3. To improve cell attachment (if necessary), equilibrate the transwell filters overnight at 37 °C in DMEM before adding the cell suspension.
Sterilize STX2 electrodes in the hood by immersion in ethanol and then in sterile PBS for 15 min each, under UV light. Connect electrodes to an EVOM epithelial voltohmmeter and select resistance mode.
Collect medium from the upper compartment of each transwell and pool them. Take 50 μl of this media mixture and combine it with 50 μl of trophozoites suspension (1 x 10⁵trophozoites in PBS) or with only PBS (control). Use a similar mixture for each transwell.
Add mixtures to the upper chamber of each transwell containing the MDCK cells. Experimental conditions include MDCK cells without trophozoites (control), a co-culture with trophozoites or with trophozoites pre-incubated with protease inhibitors or mαEhCPADH112. To eliminate the resistance provided by filters, use transwells incubated with medium only. For each experimental condition use at least three transwells.
Immediately, measure TER by dipping the STX2 electrodes into each transwell.
1. Ensure that the longer electrode touches the bottom of the lower chamber and that the shorter electrode is covered by medium in the upper compartment (see Figure 2B).
2. Make sure to hold the electrodes perpendicularly each time. This will improve reproducibility, significantly. Avoid moving or tilting the electrode during the measurements as this will lead to variation of data.
This measurement should be considered the initial TER value. Then, monitor the TER during the following 30 min.
To calculate the final TER value, subtract the TER value of filters only. To compare results from different experiments normalize each data point to the initial values, taking these as 100% (Figure 2B).

Representative Results

For a successful E. histolytica culture, two important conditions must be fulfilled: growth in axenic conditions and harvest in logarithmic phase. Previously, cultures of E. histolytica were readily established in association with certain species of bacteria or trypanosomatids²². However, nowadays it is common to have axenic cultivation of this parasite meaning an indefinite subcultivation of amoebae in an environment free of metabolizing bacteria, fungi, protozoa, or metazoan cells. Additionally, harvesting the trophozoites during the late logarithmic to early stationary phase of growth is crucial to have viable and proliferating cells²³. Therefore, it is important to distinguish this phase by quantification of trophozoites along several days and also by examining their intact morphology and rapid locomotion (Figure 1).

For interaction studies, epithelial cells need to be in a confluent monolayer to represent physiological conditions that amoebas would normally encounter in the body. Several epithelial cell lines, easy to cultivate, are available. While a more physiological cell model system would derive from the intestines such as Caco-2 or T84, these cell lines grow rather slowly. A faster growing cell line that has extensively been studied are MDCK cells²⁴. These epithelial cells are of kidney origin and are characterized by high TER, strong TJ and easy cultivation. This cell line has been used for decades to study cell biology of junctions and TJ composition as well as mechanisms of TJ assembly and disassembly. For these reasons, MDCK cells are often chosen by researchers when studying TJ functions. MDCK cells have also been widely used as a model for the study of mechanisms induced during amoebiasis^5,8,10,25-28. In a recent study, we reported that interaction of strain I MDCK cells and intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells with live amoebas, lysates and amoeba products caused similar effects on TJ composition and TER¹⁰. Thus, MDCK cells are a suitable model to study mechanisms of amoeba-epithelia interactions. Furthermore, the use of several E. histolytica products (intact trophozoites, trophozoite total lysates or secreted products harvested as trophozoites culture supernatant) is crucial to provide additional and relevant information about molecules involved in these interactions, such as availability, mode of action, secretion, participation of other molecules and triggering of signaling pathways.

While reaching confluency, epithelial cells form contacts that are stabilized by TJ and AJ. These structures are composed of certain molecules that can be visualized by using specific antibodies in immunofluorescence stainings. For example, in Figure 3, cell contacts are visualized by an antibody against the TJ marker ZO-1 and a red fluorescently labeled secondary antibody. As it can be seen, cells gather in close proximity to form a dense monolayer without any hole. In this figure, the amoeba-derived complex EhCPADH112 has been stained using a monoclonal antibody that is detected by a green fluorescently labeled secondary antibody to study the interaction of this complex with the epithelial surface. Three different sources of this complex have been applied to the epithelial monolayer: live trophozoites (T), trophozoite total lysates (TL) and secreted products (SP). Strikingly, in all cases, co-localization of EhCPADH112 with ZO-1 can be observed (Figure 3, arrows), indicating that this complex could be required to facilitate E. histolytica penetration into the epithelial monolayer.

Although this interaction can already be observed as early as 2 min after amoeba-epithelial cell contact, the cell layer is not yet affected by this interaction since the ZO-1 staining still looks continuous. This completely changes after longer incubation times as shown in Figure 4. Here, images were taken after 30 min of exposure to the three different EhCPADH112 sources. A clear disruption of TJ is visualized by a discontinuous ZO-1 staining at cell borders (Figure 4, arrows), with the most evident effect occurring in MDCK cell in contact with T or TL. By contrast, ZO-1 gets internalized and is seen in intracellular vesicles. Exact co-localization with either TJ or AJ along the lateral cell membranes cannot be distinguished by just looking on top of the monolayer but rather by obtaining a “side”-view of cell contacts²⁹. Confocal laser microscopy allows such a view along the xz-axis as demonstrated in Figures 3 and 4 below each xy view. These images show a clear statement whether proteins co-localize with TJ at the most apical portion of the lateral membrane or if they are rather located below TJ or above TJ at the apical membrane. In Figure 3 (arrowheads), an exact co-localization of the EhCPADH112 complex with ZO-1 can be observed, clearly revealing TJ as the place of action for this virulence factor. In contrast, as E. histolytica invasion progressed (30 min of interaction) into the epithelia, EhCPADH112 penetrated towards the intercellular space as the staining along the lateral membrane showed (Figure 4, arrowheads). In our recent paper, this method allowed us to distinguish between TJ and AJ because this complex only co-localized with the TJ markers occludin and claudin-1 but not with the AJ marker β–catenin at 2 min of interaction¹⁰.

Internalization of TJ components, as can be seen in the immunofluorescence stainings in Figure 4, is usually accompanied by a loss of barrier function that can be measured by transepithelial electrical resistance (TER). TER reflects the ion flow across the epithelial monolayer and can be measured using electrodes as shown in Figure 2B. When the monolayer is not yet completely formed or disrupted due to extracellular cues, a free flow of ions across the cell layer is indicated by a low TER. TER was measured of a control confluent monolayer that has not been in contact with amoeba products or monolayers in contact with trophozoites (Figure 5). Parasite contact disrupted epithelial barrier function indicated by a TER drop of 90% in comparison to the control monolayers. To investigate the mechanisms by which trophozoites affect barrier function, we pre-incubated the trophozoites with an antibody against EhCPADH112 to prevent adhesion of this complex or with protease inhibitors, to block the proteolytic activity of this complex and other proteases important for target cell damage. Both treatments led to an almost complete reversal of TER drop, suggesting that both proteolytic activity and adhesive properties are important virulence factors of this complex during E. histolytica invasion.

Figure 1. Typical growth curve of axenically cultivated E. histolytica trophozoites. Inocula of 2 x 10⁵ trophozoites of E. histolytica HMI-IMSS clone A were grown in 6-well dishes with TYI-S-33 medium and after each 24 hr cell numbers were determined using a hematocytomer. Cellular growth was monitored by light microscopy and morphology of growing cells is depicted in the upper panel. The amount of trophozoites was monitored for 6 days (d) and values were plotted in the chart below. Data represent the mean and standard error of the mean of three independent measurements. Bar = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. Schematic representation of interactions among MDCK cells and different conditions of E. histolytica. A) Different conditions of E. histolytica are shown: live trophozoites (T), total trophozoites lysates (TL) and molecules secreted by trophozoites into the medium (SP). Any experimental condition was assayed for 2 and 30 min of incubation with confluent MDCK cells. After incubation, MDCK cells were abundantly washed to remove trophozoites or unbound parasitic molecules. Then samples were processed for immunofluorescence assays, employing mαEhCPADH112 and pαZO-1 antibodies to co-localize the parasitic complex EhCPADH112 and the TJ marker ZO-1, respectively. Later, species-specific secondary antibodies coupled to different fluorochromes were used to detect both proteins by confocal microscopy. B) Addition of trophozoites only or trophozoites pre-incubated with mαEhCPADH112 or protease inhibitors for 20 min at 4 °C in the upper compartment of transwells containing confluent MDCK cells. TER of epithelial cells was monitored using a STX2 electrode connected to an EVOM voltohmeter, during 30 min. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3. Localization of EhCPADH112 at TJ of MDCK monolayers. MDCK cells were incubated with live trophozoites (T), total trophozoites lysates (TL) and molecules secreted by trophozoites into the medium (SP) for 2 min. Upper panel: phase contrast images of MDCK cells. EhCPADH112 and ZO-1 proteins were identified by mαEhCPADH112 and pαZO-1 antibodies and then with FITC- and TRITC-secondary antibodies, respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Arrows: protein localization at cell borders. Arrowheads in xz-planes: protein localization at TJ. Bar = 10 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4. Internalization of EhCPADH112 into MDCK cells. MDCK cells were incubated with live trophozoites (T), total trophozoites lysates (TL) and molecules secreted by trophozoites into the medium (SP) for 30 min. Upper panel: phase contrast images of MDCK cells. EhCPADH112 and ZO-1 proteins were identified by mαEhCPADH112 and pαZO-1 antibodies and then with FITC- and TRITC-secondary antibodies, respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Arrows: protein localization at cell borders. Arrowheads in xz-planes: protein localization at lateral membrane (arrowheads). Bar = 10 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5. E. histolytica via EhCPADH112 induces epithelial barrier disruption. MDCK monolayers were incubated with live trophozoites (T) or T pre-incubated with protease inhibitors (PI) or mαEhCPADH112 antibody (α) for 30 min and TER was evaluated at indicated times. TER was normalized according to the initial value for each transwell (~3,200 Ω·cm²). Means and standard errors of the means are represented for each time point. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 5 software using one-way ANOVA test. *** P < 0.001.

Discussion

In order to study in vitro host-pathogen interactions during epithelial infection by E. histolytica, it is crucial to work with well-established cultures of both epithelial cells and trophozoites. For example, formerly, E. histolytica cultures had usually been established in association with certain species of bacteria or trypanosomatids^22,23. However, co-cultivation of E. histolytica cultures is counterproductive for the study of host-pathogen interactions because observed effects on host cells could not unequivocally be attributed to the ameobas but could rather be an effect of the co-cultivated cells. Thus, an axenical culture of E. histolytica is desirable for the examination of specific host-pathogen interactions. The provided protocol describes how such an axenic cultivation of E. histolytica can be achieved to specifically exploit such cultures for infection studies. Additionally, the timing of harvest of E. histolytica is also critical. E. histolytica harvest is recommended during late stages of exponential growth to ensure a high yield of cells with high viability.

On the other hand, a well-established monolayer of epithelial cells is also mandatory to obtain reproducible results. To emulate a physiologically tight epithelial monolayer, cultured cells need be used at the correct timing. The monolayer has to be completely formed without any holes. Furthermore, the correct formation of TJ and AJ requires some time after cell contacts are established. Usually, epithelial cells are contact-inhibited, meaning that cells stop proliferating in a confluent monolayer, so that it is usually better to give the cells another day of growth. However, this should not be expanded since this contact inhibition is not indefinite and cells may at some point start to overgrow each other. If this is observed it will be necessary to split or discard cells and not use them in assays. The formation of tight epithelial monolayers is best controlled by measuring TER. However, this requires growth in transwell filters, which are rather expensive. To develop an eye for a good monolayer it may be helpful for the inexperienced experimenter to compare cell growth in the same cultivation format after disseminating various cell numbers.

The timing of the host-parasite interaction assay is another crucial factor. After 2 min of interaction, no epithelial damage could be observed but an interaction of EhCPADH112 with the TJ molecule ZO-1 was already apparent. However, after 30 min interaction, severe epithelial damage was observed as indicated by TJ disassembly and a drop of TER (¹⁰ and this study). These data suggest that an early adhesive interaction with the apical epithelial side is necessary to loosen the contacts and allow penetration of other molecules such as proteases that then contribute to degradation of other TJ, AJ and desmosome molecules. The concentration of the trophozoites proteins is also important. Of note, different results could be observed when applying live trophozoites or just lysates or secreted products of E. histolytica. The relative proportion of trophozoites to epithelial cells was previously proven¹⁰ and even when the ratio of MDCK-to-secreted-products by amoeba was high (1:10), the epithelial damage was not as severe. This indicates not only that the concentration of a single virulence protein is critical but that it also could be the interplay of various factors that result in effective epithelial damage to allow rapid invasion of amoebas. For example, Chadee´s group highlighted the importance of another amoeba-derived protease, EhCP5, to elicit epithelial damage¹⁶. It seems likely that an interplay of virulence factors is in vivo required to induce amoebiasis and that missing interactions due to inhibition of a single protein may account for the fact that in most cases infections are quiescent. In this respect, it is also important to mention that epithelial products such as mucins are important to protect against infection. In particular, mucin2 knock-out mice are more susceptible to EhCP5-induced TJ alterations and infection¹⁶. Thus, alterations on the epithelial side also need to be considered to assess amoeba invasiveness.

One important limitation of the described technologies to detect co-localization is that it does not unequivocally prove a direct interaction. In this case, a co-localization or interaction could be also mediated by another protein that is just not visualized. To detect a direct interaction, it will be necessary to produce recombinant tagged (such as GST or 10xHis) proteins and perform immunoprecipitation for one tag and Western blot for the other. Anyways, immunofluorescence stainings have the advantage of revealing the exact cellular location of the protein complex and give the experimenter an idea of the proteins that should be tested in such an in vitro interaction assay. Another drawback is that there are only few amoeba-specific antibodies available. Thus, if one wants to study certain amoeba proteins in such interaction studies, it will most likely require the generation of an antibody. However, if antibodies are available, the described methods can be applied to study the relevance of other amoeba proteins (secreted or surface-bound) for host-pathogen interactions.

This paper describes an easy model to detect co-localization and interactions between molecules of the host and parasite. The knowledge gained from these cell-based experiments can be applied in in vivo infection models using hamsters or mice to corroborate the physiological relevance for host invasion by the parasite. These data could then be used for the development of novel treatment strategies.

In summary, we provide detailed protocols for cultivating E. histolytica and epithelial cells for the use in host-pathogen interaction studies, in particular, assays that permit evaluation of co-localization and TJ disassembly. The timing of the cultures as well as that of each assay is crucial to ensure reproducibility of obtained results. While timing of the cultures can be influenced by varying the number of disseminated cells, the timing of the experiments themselves depends on the type of assay and the type of proteins investigated.

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Institute of Science and Technology of the Federal District (ICyTDF, 64/2012 to EO) and the Mexican Council for Science and Technology (Conacyt, 179895 to MS).

Materials

Entamoeba histolytica HM1:IMSS, Clone A	IMSS Hospital, Mexico	Without/number	Virulent trophozoites¹⁸
TYI broth	Becton, Dickinson and Company Merck Merck Merck J.T. Baker Reproquifin SIGMA-Aldrich SIGMA-Aldrich	211862 K35625437 626 21578 4873 3252-01 CAS 50-81-7 C7880 F-5879	3.45% BBL Biosate peptone 58 mM glucose 39 mM NaCl 5 mM KH₂PO₄ 6.5 mM K₂HPO₄ 16.3 mM ascorbic acid 8.1 mM L-cysteine 0.1 mM ferric ammonium citrate, adjust pH 6.8¹⁹
				Bovine serum adult	Microlab , Labs., Mex.	SU146	Use at 10% and inactivated to 56° C for 30 min
				Diamond vitamin mixture- Tween 80	In vitro	SR-07	Use at 3%
				Penicillin	Lakeside, Méx.	34564SSA IV	0.5 IU/mL
				Streptomycin	Lakeside, Méx.	75757SSA IV	35 µg/ mL
				Pyrex 15 mL screw cap culture tubes with PTFE lined phenolic caps	Corning-Pyrex	9826-16X	16×125 mm, capacity 15 mL and caps fabricated from special formula resistant to effects of temperature
				Cell culture plates, 6 Well	Corning-Costar	3516	Sterile plates, well diameter 34.8 mm and growth area 9.5 cm². Rings on lid prevent cross-contamination
				25cm² cell culture flask	Corning-Costar	430168	Canted neck flasks
MDCK (Madin Darby canine kidney) type I	American Type Culture Collection	CCL34	Kidney epithelial cells grown between the 60^th and 90^th passage
DMEM medium	Gibco	12800-017	Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium with high glucose.
Neonate Calf Serum	In vitro	S-02	Use at 10%.
Penicillin/Streptomycin mixture	In vitro	A-01	Stock solution 10,000 U/µg/mL
Insulin	AMSA	398MJ94SSA IV	Stock solution 100 IU/mL
Trypsin solution	In vitro	EN-005	0.05% enzyme solution without calcium and magnesium
75cm² cell culture flask	Corning-Costar	430720	Canted neck flasks for trophozoite culture in TYI-S-33 medium
Transwell permeable supports	Corning-Costar	3470	0.4. µm polyster membrane, 6.5 mm insert in 24 well plate, growth area 0.3 cm²
24 well cell culture dish	Corning-Costar	3524	Clear polystyrene, treated for optimal cell attachment, sterilized by gamma radiation and certified non-pyrogenic
Complete Mini	Roche	11836 153 001	Protease inhibitor cocktail inhibits a broad spectrum of serine, cysteine and metallo-proteases. Final concentration 1 mM
Trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido (4-guanidino) butane (E-64)	SIGMA-Aldrich	E3132	Cystein protease inhibitor, final concentration 40 µg/mL
pαZO-1	Invitrogen	402200	IgG rabbit policlonal antibody against a synthetic peptide in the middle region of the ZO-1 human protein
mαEhCPADH112	Homemade antibody	Without/ Number	IgM mouse monoclonal antibody against 444-601 epitope located at C-terminal of EhCPADH112^21,27
FITC-goat anti-mouse IgM	Zymed	62-6811	Fluorescein isotiocyanate (FITC)-labelled goat anti-mouse secondary antibody
TRITC- goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L)	Zymed	816114	Tetramethyl-rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody.
STX2 Electrode	World Precision Instrument	102711	Consists of a fixed pair of double electrodes, 4 mm wide and 1 mm thick. Each stick of the electrode pair contains a silver/silver-chloride pellet for measuring voltage and a silver electrode for passing current. For use with EVOM
EVOM epithelial voltohmmeter	World Precision Instrument	12111	Use in resistance mode and maintain unplugged during TER measurements
Neubauer chamber	MEARIENFELD	610610	Hemocytometer
Leica TCS_SP5_MO	Leica	Without/number	Laser confocal microscopy with Leica microsystems CMS Gmbh/leica Las af Lite/BIN software
Vectashield	Vector Laboratories, Inc.	H-1000	Mounting medium for fluorescence
4´, 6-diamino-2-phenylindole (Dapi)	SIGMA	D-9542	0.05 mM final concentration
Bovine serum albumin (BSA)	US Biological	A-1310	0.5% final concentration for blocking solution

Referenzen

Faust, D. M., Guillen, N. Virulence and virulence factors in Entamoeba histolytica, the agent of human amoebiasis. Microbes Infect. 14, 1428-1441 (2012).
Stauffer, W., Ravdin, J. I. Entamoeba histolytica: an update. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 16, 479-485 (2003).
Santi-Rocca, J., Rigothier, M. C., Guillen, N. Host-microbe interactions and defense mechanisms in the development of amoebic liver abscesses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 22, 65-75 (2009).
Turner, J. R. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 9, 799-809 (2009).
Garcia-Rivera, G., et al. Entamoeba histolytica : a novel cysteine protease and an adhesin form the 112 kDa surface protein. Mol Microbiol. 33, 556-568 (1999).
Leippe, M. Amoebapores. Parasitol Today. 13, 178-183 (1997).
Leippe, M., Bruhn, H., Hecht, O., Grotzinger, J. Ancient weapons: the three-dimensional structure of amoebapore. A. Trends Parasitol. 21, 5-7 (2005).
Ocadiz, R., et al. EhCP112 is an Entamoeba histolytica secreted cysteine protease that may be involved in the parasite-virulence. Cell Microbiol. 7, 221-232 (2005).
Sajid, M., McKerrow, J. H. Cysteine proteases of parasitic organisms. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 120, 1-21 (2002).
Betanzos, A., et al. The EhCPADH112 complex of Entamoeba histolytica interacts with tight junction proteins occludin and claudin-1 to produce epithelial damage. PLoS One. 8, (2013).
Lauwaet, T., et al. Proteinase inhibitors TPCK and TLCK prevent Entamoeba histolytica induced disturbance of tight junctions and microvilli in enteric cell layers in vitro. Int J Parasitol. 34, 785-794 (2004).
Leroy, A., et al. Contact-dependent transfer of the galactose-specific lectin of Entamoeba histolytica to the lateral surface of enterocytes in culture. Infect Immun. 63, 4253-4260 (1995).
Leroy, A., Lauwaet, T., De Bruyne, G., Cornelissen, M., Mareel, M. Entamoeba histolytica disturbs the tight junction complex in human enteric T84 cell layers. FASEB J. 14, 1139-1146 (2000).
Leroy, A., et al. Disturbance of tight junctions by Entamoeba histolytica: resistant vertebrate cell types and incompetent trophozoites. Arch Med Res. 31, (2000).
Lauwaet, T., et al. Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites transfer lipophosphopeptidoglycans to enteric cell layers. Int J Parasitol. 34, 549-556 (2004).
Kissoon-Singh, V., Moreau, F., Trusevych, E., Chadee, K. Entamoeba histolytica Exacerbates Epithelial Tight Junction Permeability and Proinflammatory Responses in Muc2(-/-) Mice. Am J Pathol. 182, 852-865 (2013).
Lejeune, M., Moreau, F., Chadee, K. Prostaglandin E2 produced by Entamoeba histolytica signals via EP4 receptor and alters claudin-4 to increase ion permeability of tight junctions. Am J Pathol. 179, 807-818 (2011).
Orozco, M. E., Martinez Palomo, A., Gonzalez Robles, A., Guarneros, G., Galindo, J. M. Interactions between lectin and receptor mediate the adhesion of E. histolytica to epithelial cells. Relation of adhesion to the virulence of the strains. Arch Invest Med (Mex). 13 Suppl 3, 159-167 (1982).
Diamond, L. S., Harlow, D. R., Cunnick, C. C. A new medium for the axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and other Entamoeba. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 72, 431-432 (1978).
Strober, W. Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol. Appendix 3, (2001).
Arroyo, R., Orozco, E. Localization and identification of an Entamoeba histolytica adhesin. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 23, 151-158 (1987).
Diamond, L. S. Axenic cultivation of Entamoeba hitolytica. Science. 134, 336-337 (1961).
Diamond, L. S. Techniques of axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica Schaudinn, 1903 and E. histolytica-like amebae. J Parasitol. 54, 1047-1056 (1968).
Dukes, J. D., Whitley, P., Chalmers, A. D. The MDCK variety pack: choosing the right strain. BMC Cell Biol. 12, (2011).
Espinosa-Cantellano, M., Martinez-Palomo, A. Pathogenesis of intestinal amebiasis: from molecules to disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 13, 318-331 (2000).
Martinez-Palomo, A., et al. Structural bases of the cytolytic mechanisms of Entamoeba histolytica. J Protozool. 32, 166-175 (1985).
Martinez-Lopez, C., et al. The EhADH112 recombinant polypeptide inhibits cell destruction and liver abscess formation by Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites. Cell Microbiol. 6, 367-376 (2004).
Ocadiz-Ruiz, R., et al. Effect of the silencing of the Ehcp112 gene on the in vitro virulence of Entamoeba histolytica. Parasit Vectors. 6, 248 (2013).
Johnson, L. G. Applications of imaging techniques to studies of epithelial tight junctions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 57, 111-121 (2005).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Diesen Artikel zitieren

Betanzos, A., Schnoor, M., Javier-Reyna, R., García-Rivera, G., Bañuelos, C., Pais-Morales, J., Orozco, E. Analysis of the Epithelial Damage Produced by Entamoeba histolytica Infection. J. Vis. Exp. (88), e51668, doi:10.3791/51668 (2014).