A live fluorescence imaging technique to quantify the replenishment and mobilisation of specific synaptic vesicle (SV) pools in central nerve terminals is described. Two rounds of SV recycling are monitored in the same nerve terminals providing an internal control.
After neurotransmitter release in central nerve terminals, SVs are rapidly retrieved by endocytosis. Retrieved SVs are then refilled with neurotransmitter and rejoin the recycling pool, defined as SVs that are available for exocytosis1,2. The recycling pool can generally be subdivided into two distinct pools – the readily releasable pool (RRP) and the reserve pool (RP). As their names imply, the RRP consists of SVs that are immediately available for fusion while RP SVs are released only during intense stimulation1,2. It is important to have a reliable assay that reports the differential replenishment of these SV pools in order to understand 1) how SVs traffic after different modes of endocytosis (such as clathrin-dependent endocytosis and activity-dependent bulk endocytosis) and 2) the mechanisms controlling the mobilisation of both the RRP and RP in response to different stimuli.
FM dyes are routinely employed to quantitatively report SV turnover in central nerve terminals3-8. They have a hydrophobic hydrocarbon tail that allows reversible partitioning in the lipid bilayer, and a hydrophilic head group that blocks passage across membranes. The dyes have little fluorescence in aqueous solution, but their quantum yield increases dramatically when partitioned in membrane9. Thus FM dyes are ideal fluorescent probes for tracking actively recycling SVs. The standard protocol for use of FM dye is as follows. First they are applied to neurons and are taken up during endocytosis (Figure 1). After non-internalised dye is washed away from the plasma membrane, recycled SVs redistribute within the recycling pool. These SVs are then depleted using unloading stimuli (Figure 1). Since FM dye labelling of SVs is quantal10, the resulting fluorescence drop is proportional to the amount of vesicles released. Thus, the recycling and fusion of SVs generated from the previous round of endocytosis can be reliably quantified.
Here, we present a protocol that has been modified to obtain two additional elements of information. Firstly, sequential unloading stimuli are used to differentially unload the RRP and the RP, to allow quantification of the replenishment of specific SV pools. Secondly, each nerve terminal undergoes the protocol twice. Thus, the response of the same nerve terminal at S1 can be compared against the presence of a test substance at phase S2 (Figure 2), providing an internal control. This is important, since the extent of SV recycling across different nerve terminals is highly variable11.
Any adherent primary neuronal cultures may be used for this protocol, however the plating density, solutions and stimulation conditions are optimised for cerebellar granule neurons (CGNs)12,13.
1. Cerebellar Granule Neuron Preparation
2. Experimental Setup
3. Sample Preparation
4. S1 Phase
5. Recovery Phase (see Figure 2)
6. S2 Phase
7. Data Analysis
8. Representative Results:
A control experiment where CGNs underwent two rounds of identical loading and unloading steps is represented in Figure 5. When commencing a series of experiments, it is essential that a control experiment such as this is performed each day to confirm that S1 and S2 are comparable before varying experimental conditions during S2.
In this example, CGNs were loaded with 10 μM FM1-43 using an 80 Hz 10 s stimulation (Figure 5a). Figure 5b shows FM1-43-loaded nerve terminals represented by fluorescent puncta. ROIs were defined over 90 nerve terminals as shown in Figure 5c. The same set of ROIs was used for both S1 and S2. During both unloads, the RRP was first unloaded with a 30 Hz (2 s) stimulation followed by RP unloading with 3 sequential 40Hz (10 s) stimuli (Figure 5a). The fluorescence drop during each stimulus can be clearly observed and quantified (Figure 5d-e). When examined, the fluorescence drops corresponding to the RRP, RP and total recycling pool were comparable in both S1 and S2. In addition, 20% of recycled SVs resided in the RRP while 80% resided in the RP in both S1 and S2.
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of a typical FM experiment. A) SV endocytosis is triggered in the presence of FM dye (represented in green). The dye is taken up by invaginating membrane (single SVs or bulk endosomes). B) Non-internalised dye on the plasma membrane is washed away by perfusion. C) Upon application of an unloading stimulus, labeled SVs that have become available for release fuse with the plasma membrane resulting in a loss of fluorescence. D) The change in fluorescence (ΔF) which is proportional to the amount of released labeled SVs can then be quantified.
Figure 2 Schematic diagrams of possible experimental protocols. A) Flow chart of a control experiment where cells undergo two rounds of FM dye loading and unloading (S1 and S2). Cells can be loaded using a range of different stimuli. Unloading steps are identical in that the RRP is unloaded with 30 Hz for 2 s followed by RP unload using 3 times 40 Hz for 10 s. RRP and reserve pool unloading stimuli were separated by 40 sec, all other stimuli by 30 sec. Cells are left to recover for 20 min between S1 and S2. Flow charts of possible modifications to test the effect of a substance on either B) endocytosis or C) exocytosis are also shown. Corresponding test drug can be perfused into the chamber during indicated periods.
Figure 3 Screenshots of data analysis in Image J. Screenshots are shown for A) brightness and contrast adjustment, B) frame alignment, C) ROIs selection, and D) intensity values extraction using Image J.
Figure 4 Screenshots of data analysis in Microsoft Excel. Screenshots are shown for A) importing raw data from Image J (1st column = frame number, remaining columns = data from individual nerve terminals) B) adjustment of S1 baseline values (frame 10) to an arbitrary value (200) at the start of the first stimulus, C) adjustment of S2 baseline values at frame 55 using an identical protocol to S1, and D) measurement of fluorescence drops using Microsoft Excel. Note that the averaged trace shown in D is used to define time points before and after each drop. The size of the fluorescence drops for each ROI should be determined from values on the spreadsheet shown in C.
Figure 5 . Representative control experiment. A) Flow chart of a control experiment where CGNs were loaded with 10μM FM1-43 using 80 Hz (10 s) stimulation. The S1 and S2 phases are identical. RRP and reserve pool unloading stimuli were separated by 40 sec, all other stimuli by 30 sec. B) An image showing nerve terminals loaded with FM1-43. C) The same image as B showing 90 numbered ROIs selected for analysis. D) Images of an area depicted by a red box in B at selected time points. Basal = before stimulation; 30 Hz = after 30 Hz 2 s stimulation; 40 Hz 1,2,3 = after each 40 Hz 10 s stimulation. These images are presented in pseudocolor to illustrate changes in fluorescence (spectrum bar displayed on the right). E) Mean ±SEM trace obtained from 90 nerve terminals depicted in C. Individual stimuli are represented by horizontal bars. Scale bars = 10 μm.
FM dyes are extensively used to investigate nerve terminal function in many neuronal preparations. They have been employed mainly to monitor the extent of either SV endocytosis, SV turnover or the kinetics of exocytosis6. The described protocol extends these studies to examine the differential unloading of specific SV pools. This provides additional information regarding the replenishment of SV pools and also their extent of mobilisation.
FM dyes can be used to label multiple rounds of SV recycling within the same nerve terminals. We have exploited this property and designed protocols in which SV turnover in each terminal can be monitored twice in the same nerve terminals. This provides an accurate internal control, which is essential due to the heterogeneous nature of SV recycling in parallel nerve terminals11. Via the use of the S1 phase as an internal control, the refilling of the RRP, RP and the total SV pool in the presence of drugs can be reliably and directly compared.
In addition to providing information of the absolute size of the recycling, RRP and RP pools under different stimulation conditions, this protocol can also provide data for the following – 1) The partitioning of SVs between the RRP and RP as a function of the recycling pool for S1 and S2, 2) the relative size of the S2 pools (RRP and RP) as a function of total S1 recycling pool and 3) the relative size of any defined SV pool in S2 as a function of the same pool in S1. This particular protocol will not provide information on unloading kinetics however, since the acquisition time is too slow (for kinetic measurements acquisition times should be as rapid as possible and unloading automatically synchronized to image capture).
Our 30 Hz 2 s stimuli evokes an identical extent of RRP unloading to hypertonic sucrose8. Since the size of the RRP is defined by hypertonic sucrose unloading15, we can state that this protocol unloads all RRP SVs, in agreement with studies in hippocampal neurons16. The reserve pool is almost completely depleted by three trains of 400 stimuli (40 Hz 10 s each) since this stimulation unloads an identical amount of dye to a paradigm (2 stimuli with 50 mM KCl) that depletes 95% of all dye-labelled SVs8,17. Accurate quantification of the size of both the RRP and reserve pool is also dependent on acquiring information within the linear dynamic range of the CCD camera.
This simple protocol can also be modified further. The strength of loading stimuli can also be varied to determine how neuronal activity and different endocytosis modes affect SV pool replenishment. Furthermore, greater than two cycles of loading and unloading can also be performed if required. This protocol can also be used in cells transfected with either overexpression or shRNA vectors. Due to the low transfection efficiency of primary neuronal cultures, expressed proteins must be tagged with fluorescent proteins. It is essential that these fluorescent tags do not interfere with the FM dye signal (use cyan or red proteins, for example). In this instance, nerve terminals from transfected and non-transfected cells in the same field of view can also be compared as an additional control8. In such experiments a comparison of the extent of loading between S1 and S2 loads is of little value, since the perturbation is present during both loads. Partitioning of dye between SV pools can still be visualized however8.
Genetic reporters called pHluorins can also be employed to monitor SV exocytosis and endocytosis in primary neuronal culture. These probes use a pH-sensitive green fluorescent protein to the pH environment of luminal domains of tagged SV proteins such as VAMP, synaptophysin and VGLUT118. When used in conjunction with vesicular ATPase inhibitors, pHluorins can report both the kinetics and extent of SV pool mobilization19. The FM-dye based approach described here has some advantages over the pHluorin technique, Firstly, FM dyes provide information on which SV endocytosis mode replenishes the RRP and reserve pools8. Secondly specific SV pools can be labeled with FM dyes that have different spectral properties20 and finally there is no requirement for transfection. FM dyes cannot provide information on SV traffic between the resting and recycling SV pools however (in contrast to pHluorins19), since by definition SVs have to be loaded with dye during endocytosis to be visible. Thus both FM dyes and pHluorins have strengths and weaknesses and are most powerful when utilized in independent experiments to address the same question.
High quality images are essential for valid analysis and reproducible results. While horizontal drift can be easily corrected, experiments where there is a drift in the Z-axis cannot be recovered. For this reason, it is important to re-focus images before commencing the S1 and S2 unloads. In cases when a significant fluorescent decay has occurred, decay corrections may be applied (usually by subtracting a previously recorded trace from FM-loaded cells in the absence of stimulation). However, it is suggested that decay correction is only performed for graphical representation and not to be used for any quantitative analysis.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by a grant from the Wellcome Trust (Ref: 084277).
Name | Company | Catalogue no. |
---|---|---|
AxioCam MRm Rev. 3 Digital Camera | Carl Zeiss | 4265099901000 |
Axio Observer.A1 Microscope | Carl Zeiss | 4310040000000 |
Cell culture plates (6 wells) | Greiner bio-one | 657160 |
Centrifuge (Universal 32R) | Hettich Zentrifugen | 1610 |
CO2 incubator | Heraeus Instruments | 51014042 |
Falcon tubes (15/50 ml) | Greiner bio-one | 188271/210261 |
Fluar 20X /0.75 ∞/0.17 Objective | Carl Zeiss | 4401459901000 |
Glass coverslips (Ø25mm) | VWR international | 631-1584 |
Glass pasteur pipettes (230 nm) | Greiner bio-one | 612-1799 |
Haemocytometer | VWR | 15170-170 |
Imaging chamber | Warner | RC-21 BRFS |
Laminar flow hood | BIOHIT | VLF BHS 1200 |
McIlwain Tissue Chopper | Mickle Laboratory Engineering Co. Ltd. | MTC/2 |
Mercury lamp | Carl Zeiss | HBO 103 |
MultiStim System Electrical Stimulator (100mV, 1ms pluse width) | Digitimer Ltd. | D330 |
Perfusion pump | Watson-Marlow | 313S |
Serological Pipettes (5/10/25 ml) | Greiner bio-one | 606180/607180/760180 |
Shutter controller | Carl Zeiss | MAC5000 |
Syringe (20 ml) | BD Plastipak | ST01-B002 |
Syringe Filters (Minisart – 0.20 μm) | Sartorius Stedim | 16532 |
VC-6 Six Channel valve controller | Warner | 64-0135 |
YFP Filter set (Set 46) | Carl Zeiss | 1196-681 |
Table 1. Specific equipment and apparatus used
Name | Company | Catalogue no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
FM1-43 | Cambridge BioScience | BT70021 | 10 μM |
FM2-10 | Cambridge BioScience | BT70044 | 100 μM |
Poly-D-lysine | Sigma | P7886 | 15 μg/ml |
Silicone grease | Sigma | 85403 | – |
Table 2. Specific reagents used
Name | Company | Catalogue no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) | Sigma | A4503 | 0.3% |
D-Glucose | Sigma | G5767 | 0.25% |
MgSO4·7H2O | Sigma | M2773 | 1.5 mM |
D-PBS | Gibco | 21300 | 960 mg/100 ml |
-make 100ml fresh for each preparation
-sterile filter before use
Table 3. Solution B for CGN preparation
Name | Company | Catalogue no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
Solution B | – | – | 19 ml |
Trypsin (5 mg/ml stock, -20°C) | Sigma | T9201 | 1 ml |
Table 4. Solution T for CGN preparation
Name | Company | Catalogue no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
Solution C | – | – | 3.2 ml |
Solution B | – | – | 16.8 ml |
Table 5. Solution W for CGN preparation
Name | Company | Catalogue no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
Deoxyribonuclease (DNase, 500 U per 0.5 ml stock, -20°C) | Sigma | D5025 | 0.5 ml |
MgSO4· 7H2O | Sigma | M2773 | 1.5 mM |
Solution B | – | – | 10 ml |
Soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI, 0.5 mg per 0.5 ml stock, -20°C) | Sigma | T9003 | 0.5 ml |
Table 6. Solution C for CGN preparation
Name | Company | Catalogue no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) | Sigma | A4503 | 4% |
Earle’s Balanced Salt Solution (EBSS) | Gibco | 24010 | 10 ml |
MgSO4· 7H2O | Sigma | M2773 | 3 mM |
Table 7. EBSS Solution for CGN preparation
Name | Company | Catalogue no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
Cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside (Ara-C) * | Sigma | C1768 | 10 μM |
Foetal Bovine Serum | Gibco | 10106 | 10 % |
D-Glucose | Sigma | G5767 | 30 mM |
L-Glutamine | Sigma | G3126 | 2 mM |
KCl | Sigma | P5405 | 25 mM |
Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) | Gibco | 21090 | 500 ml |
Penicillin (P)/Streptomycin (S) | Gibco | 15140 | 100 U/ml (P), 100 μg/ml (S) |
*Ara-C should be added to medium from 1 DIV onwards
Table 8. Culture Media for CGN preparation
Name | Version | Company |
---|---|---|
AxioVision Rel. | 4.8 | Carl Zeiss |
ImageJ | 1.42q | National Institutes of Health |
Microsoft Excel | 2003 | Microsoft |
Table 9. Specific computer software used
Name | Company | Catalogue no. | Concentration |
---|---|---|---|
CaCl2 · 2H2O | Sigma | C7902 | 1.3 mM |
Glucose | Sigma | G5767 | 5 mM |
KCl | Sigma | P5405 | 3.5 mM |
KH2PO4 | Sigma | P9791 | 0.4 mM |
MgCl2·6H2O | Sigma | M0250 | 1.2 mM |
NaCl | Fluka | 71378 | 170 mM |
NaHCO3 | Fluka | 71627 | 5 mM |
Na2SO4 | BDH Laboratory Supplies | 10264 | 1.2 mM |
TES | Sigma | T1375 | 20 mM |
Table 10. Saline Solution (pH 7.4)