Here we demostrate several in vivo tests (flash visual evoked potential, pattern electroretinogram and optic coherence tomography) in goat and rhesus macaque to understand the structure and function of the optic nerve and its neurons.
The optic nerve collects axons signals from the retinal ganglion cells and transmits visual signal to the brain. Large animal models of optic nerve injury are essential for translating novel therapeutic strategies from rodent models to clinical application due to their closer similarities to humans in size and anatomy. Here we describe some in vivo methods to evaluate the function and structure of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and optic nerve (ON) in large animals, including visual evoked potential (VEP), pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Both goat and non-human primate were employed in this study. By presenting these in vivo methods step by step, we hope to increase experimental reproducibility among different labs and facilitate the usage of large animal models of optic neuropathies.
The optic nerve (ON), which consists of axons from the retinal ganglion cells (RGC), transmits visual signal from the retina to the brain. ON diseases, such as glaucoma, traumatic or ischemic optic neuropathy, often caused irreversible ON/RGC degeneration and devastating visual loss. Although there are currently many breakthroughs in ON regeneration and RGC protection in rodent models1,2,3,4,5,6, clinical treatments for most of the ON diseases remained essentially the same over the last half century with unsatisfactory outcome7,8. To fill the gap between basic research and clinical practice, translational studies using large animal model of ON diseases are often necessary and beneficial because of their closer anatomical similarity to humans than rodent models.
Goat and rhesus macaques are two large animal species used in our lab to model human's ON disease. The size of a goat's eyeball, ON, and the adjacent structure (orbital and nasal cavity, skull base, etc.) is similar to that of a human based on skull CT scan9. As such, goat model provides an opportunity to evaluate and refine therapeutic devices or surgical procedures prior to use in humans. The rhesus macaque, as non-human primate (NHP), has human-like unique visual system that does not exist in other species10,11. In addition, pathophysiological responses to injuries and treatments in NHP is much similar to that in humans12.
In vivo tests to assess the ON and RGC's structure and function longitudinally are important in large animal studies. Pattern electroretinogram (PERG) has been used to evaluate the RGC function. Flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) reflects the integrity of retino-geniculo-cortical pathway in the visual system. Thus, PERG combined with FVEP can reflect the ON function9,13,14 . The retinal optic coherence tomography (OCT) imaging can show the retinal structure with high temporal and spatial resolution, which enables measurement of the thickness of the retinal ganglion complex (GCC)9,15. For electrophysiological examinations in this study, monitoring vital signs (heat rate, breach rate, blood pressure) and level of oxygen saturation (SpO2) before testing are crucial since these parameters have potent impacts on ocular blood flow and thus the function of the visual system. However, we didn't monitor the vital signs when carrying out OCT retinal imaging for the sake of simplicity. According to our previous study9, the GCC thickness measured by OCT retinal imaging is quite stable, with inter-session coefficient of variation close to 3%. These in vivo tests in goat and rhesus macaque have been described in detail in our previous study9. Here we present these methods to help increase experimental transparency and reproducibility.
Experiments were conducted strictly in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals, and adhere to the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Wenzhou Medical University (WMU) and Joinn Laboratory (Suzhou). The male Saanen goats, aged from 4 to 6 months with weight of 19-23 kg, were housed in the WMU animal facility. The male Rhesus macaques, aged from 5 to 6 years with weight of 5-7 kg, were housed in the Joinn animal facility. All the animals were maintained in an air-conditioned room with controlled temperature (21 ± 2 °C) under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle with food ad libitum.
1. Flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) in goat
2. PVEP in rhesus macaque
NOTE: Pattern VEPs could be elicited in rhesus macaques9 and are more stable than Flash VEP in amplitude and implicit time17. Therefore, PVEP was used to detect the integrity of the retino-geniculo-cortical pathway in non-human primates.
3. Pattern ERG (PERG) in goat
NOTE: In the previous study, no interocular crosstalk of PERG signal was observed in goats, so PERG responses can be recorded simultaneously from both eyes9.
4. PERG in rhesus macaque
NOTE: It is unclear if there is interocular crosstalk of PERG signal in rhesus macaque, so PERG responses from both eyes are recorded separately.
5. OCT in goat
6. OCT in rhesus macaque
Figure 1A shows representative results of FVEP in goat. Although the waveforms in same flash intensity have relative similarity, we still recommend to examine the waveforms twice. Electromagnetic waves generated by electronic devices will interfere with the collected electrical signals, resulting in high baseline noise and poor repeatability of the waveform. Therefore, it is recommended to ensure that there are no redundant electronic devices plugged into the surrounding environment during electrophysiological examination to avoid such interference, and it is recommended to repeat at least two measurements to determine the stability and repeatability of experimental results. When patching both eyes, the waveforms are totally flat on both eyes, which shows that the waveforms are certainly generating from our flash stimulus. Figure 1B shows representative results of PERG in goat. Due to its stability and high signal, we acquire reliable waveform just by one time measurement at each spatial frequency. As the spatial frequency increases, the size of the checkerboard will gradually exceed the recognition of the goat's eyes. So we can see that at 12.7 cpd, the PVEP waveform has dropped a lot. Analogous to FVEP, the waveform disappears when we close the screen. Figure 1C shows representative results of PVEP in rhesus macaque. We repeat the measurement twice at each spatial frequency. As the spatial frequency increases, the amplitude will decrease. This is due to the fact that the spatial frequency exceeds the perception of the eye. Figure 1D shows representative results of PERG in rhesus macaque. The reason why the amplitude decreases with the spatial frequency is the same as described above. When analyzing these data, you can choose to analyze the amplitude between the peaks and troughs or the latency time of the peaks or troughs as the statistics.
Figure 2 shows the representative results of OCT in goat. The leftmost image shows a fundus photograph taken by infrared camera. Tightly to the right is a tomogram of the retina, showing the overall thickness of the retina around the ONH and the thickness of each layer. As shown in the picture, we can clearly see that goats have larger retinal blood vessels than monkeys. The green discs on the far right is a quantitative analysis of the thickness of the GCC around the ONH. G stands for general, T stands for temporal side, N stands for nasal side, S stands for superior, and I stands for inferior. The black font represents the GCC thickness measurement value in micrometers, and the green is the clinical reference measurement value for human, not as a reference for this experiment.
Figure 1: Representative electrophysiological waveforms in goat and rhesus macaques. (A) Representative FVEP waveforms at different light intensities from an individual goat within the same anesthetic session. (B,D) Representative PERG waveforms at different spatial frequencies from an individual goat (B) or rhesus macaque (D) within the same anesthetic session. (C) Representative PVEP waveforms at different spatial frequencies from an individual rhesus macaque within the same anesthetic session. The typical implicit time of each waveform is mentioned in the Protocol section. n = 1 subject for each test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: OCT results. Representative retinal OCT images around the optic nerve head (left panel) and the thickness of GCC in different peripapillary regions (right panel) in goat (A) and rhesus macaque (B). n = 1 subject for each test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In this study, we present a protocol of VEP, PERG, and OCT in goat and rhesus macaque. These in vivo methods can be applied in large animal models of various optic neuropathies, such as glaucoma, ischemic, or traumatic optic neuropathy and optic neuritis9.
PVEP is more stable and sensitive than FVEP17; however, it can’t be elicited in goat9. As such, FVEP is performed in goat and PVEP is performed in rhesus macaque in our lab to evaluate the integrity of the retino-geniculo-cortical pathway. The mechanism underlying the observation that PERG, but not PVEP, can be induced in goat is still unclear according to our knowledge. It is possible that the optic nerve function and structure from goat might be different from human.
Since the amplitude of FVEP may be affected by pupillary size and ambient light, we dilate the pupil and place a black blanket over the goat’s head during FVEP recording. It should be noticed that pupil dilation is not needed for FVEP in clinics17. Similarly, although dark adaptation is not necessary for FVEP recording in clinics, we found that a 5 min adaption to the ambient light before FVEP recording may increase intrasession repeatability in amplitude.
PERG signal is thought to originated from the RGCs and thus its amplitude could be used to estimate the function of the RGCs13,20. Compared with some special flash ERG components, such as scotopic threshold response (STR) and photopic negative response (PhNR), PERG is more sensitive to RGC dysfunction13. Potential limitations of PERG test in this study are as follows. First, ISCEV recommends using classic CRT (cathode ray tube) stimulator for PERG recording to keep mean luminance constant. However, the classic CRT stimulator is less available than liquid crystal display (LCD). Although the screen of LCD usually presents transient luminance changes during pattern reversal, potentially causing luminance artifact17, it didn’t contribute to the amplitude of PERG in goat according to our previous finding: the amplitude of PERG at the spatial frequency of 12.6 cpd is usually neglectable compared with those at lower spatial frequencies9. Another limitation is that we didn’t correct refractive error before PERG test for the sake of simplicity. To make up for this limitation, baseline PERG amplitude should be recorded as a reference.
Our previous study had assessed and optimized the intra- and inter session variation of VEP and PERG9. We found that compared with xylazine, isoflurane resulted in more repeatable FVEP but more variable PERG waveforms in goats9. Therefore, we used isoflurane in FVEP test and xylazine in PERG and OCT test in goats. Additionally, compared with PERG, VEP recording is potentially more variable. As such, we regularly repeat VEP recording at each light intensity or spatial frequency to check the intrasession variation. On the contrast, PERG waveforms are much more stable. Therefore, we generally do not repeat PERG recording. Although repeated recording on a different day on the same subject is generally recommended, we do not regularly repeat VEP or PERG recording on the same subject on a different day for the sake of simplicity and animal ethics. Nevertheless, FVEP and PERG recordings without inter-session repeat is sensitive enough to detect optic nerve injury according to our previous study9.
Retinal OCT imaging is a convenient, reliable and non-invasive technique to longitudinally monitor and quantify dynamic changes in the retinal structure. Compared with PERG and VEP, OCT imaging has much better intersession repeatability9. Furthermore, OCT imaging can capture and quantify all the optic nerve fiber within minutes without sampling error, offering a much cheaper and effective opportunity to examine the retinal structure than traditional histological analysis. However, the spatial resolution of current OCT imaging is still too limited to tell individual RGC soma or optic nerve fiber. Additionally, it should be noticed that a thicker GCC measured by OCT does not necessarily mean a more intact inner retina because GCC thickening may be caused by retinal edema or hemorrhage.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This study was funded by the following grants: National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA1101200); Medical Research Project of Wenzhou (Y20170188), National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC1101200); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81770926;81800842); Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province (2018C03G2090634); and Key R&D Program of Wenzhou Eye Hospital (YNZD1201902). The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
47.6 x 26.8 cm monitors | DELL Inc. | E2216HV | The visual stimuli of contrast-reversal black-white checkerboards were displayed on screens |
6.0 mm tracheal tube | Henan Tuoren Medical Device Co., Ltd | PVC 6.0 | ensure the airway |
alligator clip | |||
atropine | Guangdong Jieyang Longyang Animal pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd. | reduce bronchial secretion and protect heart from vagal nerve activation | |
Carbomer Eye Gel | Fabrik GmbH Subsidiary of Bausch & Lomb | moisten the cornea and stabilize the recording electrodes | |
ERG-Jet recording electrodes | Roland Consult Stasche&Finger GmbH | 2300 La Chaux-De-Fonds | ERG recording |
eye speculum | Shanghai Jinzhong Medical Device Co., Ltd | ZYD020 | open palpebral fissure |
Heidelberg Spectralis OCT system | Heidelberg Engineering | OCT system | |
Imaging | (https://www.heidelbergengineering.com/media/e-learning/Totara-US/files/pdf-tutorials/2238-003_Spectralis-Training-Guide.pdf) | ||
isoflurane | RWD Life Science Co., Ltd | R510-22 | isoflurane anesthesia |
male Saanen goats | Caimu Livestock Company, country (Hangzhou, China) | The male Saanen goats, aged from 4 to 6 months with weight of 19–23 kg | |
needle electrode | Roland Consult Stasche&Finger GmbH | U51-426-G-D | use for FVEP ground electrode and PERG reference electrodes |
periphery venous catheter intravenously | BD shanghai Medical Device Co., Ltd | 383019 | intravenous access for atropine and propofol |
propofol | Xian Lipont Enterprise Union Management Co.,Ltd. | induce Isoflurane anesthesia in goat | |
Tropicamide Phenylephrine Eye Drops | SANTEN OY, Japan | 5% tropicamide and 5% phenylephrine hydrochloride | |
visual electrophysiology device | Gotec Co., Ltd | GT-2008V-III | use for FVEP & PERG |
xylazine | Huamu Animal Health Products Co., Ltd. | xylazine anesthesia: intramuscular injection of xylazine 3mg/kg | |
zoletil50 | Virbac | induce Isoflurane anesthesia in monkey |