This work presents a protocol to perform a stereotaxic, neurosurgical implantation of microelectrode arrays in the common marmoset. This method specifically enables electrophysiological recordings in freely behaving animals but can be easily adapted to any other similar neurosurgical intervention in this species (e.g., cannula for drug administration or electrodes for brain stimulation).
Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are small non-human primates that are gaining popularity in biomedical and preclinical research, including the neurosciences. Phylogenetically, these animals are much closer to humans than rodents. They also display complex behaviors, including a wide range of vocalizations and social interactions. Here, an effective stereotaxic neurosurgical procedure for implantation of recording electrode arrays in the common marmoset is described. This protocol also details the pre- and postoperative steps of animal care that are required to successfully perform such a surgery. Finally, this protocol shows an example of local field potential and spike activity recordings in a freely behaving marmoset 1 week after the surgical procedure. Overall, this method provides an opportunity to study the brain function in awake and freely behaving marmosets. The same protocol can be readily used by researchers working with other small primates. In addition, it can be easily modified to allow other studies requiring implants, such as stimulating electrodes, microinjections, implantation of optrodes or guide cannulas, or ablation of discrete tissue regions.
Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are gaining recognition as an important model organism in many fields of research, including neuroscience. These new-world primates represent an important complementary animal model to both rodents and other non-human primates (NHPs), such as the rhesus macaque. Like rodents, these animals are small, easy to manipulate, and relatively economical to care for and breed1,2,3,4, as compared with larger NHPs. Furthermore, these animals have a propensity for twinning and high fecundity relative to other NHPs1,2,3. Another advantage the marmoset has over many other primates is that modern molecular biology tools3,4,5,6,7 and a sequenced genome2,3,4,5,8 have been used to genetically modify them. Both knock-in animals using lentivirus5, and knock-out animals using zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENS)7, have yielded viable founder animals.
An advantage in relation to rodents is that marmosets, as primates, are phylogenetically closer to humans3,5,6,9,10,11. Like humans, marmosets are diurnal animals that depend on a highly developed visual system to guide much of their behavior10. Further, marmosets exhibit behavioral complexity, including a wide range of social behaviors such as the use of different vocalizations3, allowing researchers to address questions not possible in other species. From a neuroscientific perspective, marmosets have lissencephaly brains, unlike the more commonly used rhesus macaque9. Furthermore, marmosets have a central nervous system similar to humans, including a more highly developed prefrontal cortex9. Together, all these characteristics position marmosets as a valuable model to study brain function in health and disease.
A common method for studying brain function involves implanting electrodes in anatomically specific locations by means of stereotaxic neurosurgery. This allows for chronical recording of the neural activity in different target areas in awake and freely behaving animals12,13. Stereotaxic neurosurgery is an indispensable technique used in many lines of research, as it allows precise targeting of neuroanatomical regions. Compared to macaque and rodent literature, there are fewer published studies describing the stereotaxic neurosurgery specific to the marmoset, and they tend to provide sparse detail of the steps involved in the surgery. Moreover, those with greater detail mainly focus on procedures for electrophysiology recording in head-restrained animals14,15,16,17.
In order to facilitate wider adoption of marmosets as a model organism in neuroscience research, the present method defines specific steps necessary for a successful stereotaxic neurosurgery in this species. In addition to implantation of recording arrays, as detailed in the present method, the same technique can be adapted for many other experimental ends, including implantation of stimulating electrodes for the treatment of diseases18 or causally driving circuit behavior19; implantation of guide cannulas for extraction and quantification of neurotransmitters20, injections of reagents, including those for inducing disease models12 or for circuit tracing studies15; ablation of discrete tissue regions21; implantation of optrodes for optogenetic studies22; implantation of optical windows for cortical microscopic analysis23; and implantation of electrocorticographic (ECoG) arrays24. Thus, the overall goal of this procedure is to outline the surgical steps involved in the implantation of microelectrode arrays for chronic electrophysiological recordings in freely behaving marmosets.
Animal experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Santos Dumont Institute Ethics Committee (protocol 02/2015AAS).
1. Surgery preparation
2. Preoperative procedures
NOTE: Two adult male marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) weighing 320–370 g were used in this study. Ensure that the animal has not eaten for 6 h prior to the induction of anesthesia.
3. Surgery procedures
4. Postoperative recovery
5. Chronic electrophysiological recordings in freely behaving marmosets
The purpose of this study was to describe a stereotaxic neurosurgical procedure for implantation of microelectrode arrays for electrophysiological recordings in the common marmoset. A typical surgery (from anesthesia induction to anesthesia recovery) will last for approximately 5−7 h, depending on the number of arrays implanted. Here, two arrays were symmetrically implanted, one in each brain hemisphere. Each array contained 32 stainless steel microwires arranged in seven bundles targeting several structures of the basal ganglia-corticothalamic circuit (Figure 1), but the electrode design and targeted brain regions may vary depending on the experiment. After successful surgery and postoperative procedures, the animal should be fully recovered within 3−5 days. If the array has been grounded and implanted properly it will be possible to record spikes (Figure 2A) and local field potentials (Figure 2B) in freely behaving animals over several weeks or months, before a mature gliotic scar is established13,30. As an example, the electrophysiological data collected in the experimental paradigm described here has been effectively used to study the concurrent activity of different regions of the basal ganglia-corticothalamic circuit during spontaneous, ground-based locomotion in a model of Parkinson’s disease26.
Finally, a successful surgery also involves implanting the arrays into the targeted structures. Non-invasive imaging methodologies, such as MRI or tomography may be performed following the surgery and prior to beginning experimental recordings. Use of such methodology will be possible only if the specific implants used are manufactured to be compatible with such techniques, and if the researcher has access to appropriate small animal equipment. Ultimate confirmation can also be performed postmortem. Nissl stained sections containing electrode tracks can be used to precisely determine the position of each implanted microwire (Figure 3). Notice that electrode tracks in coronal sections appear as tears in the tissue. Thus extreme care must be used when sectioning is performed to reduce the chance of creating artifacts that will confound interpretation.
Figure 1: Microelectrode array for implantation in small primates. The array was composed of 32 stainless steel microwires. The wires were 50 µm in diameter and were organized in seven bundles aimed to reach the following areas: primary motor cortex (M1), putamen (Put), caudate (Cd), globus pallidus (GPe), ventrolateral and ventroposterior lateral thalamic nucleus (VPL), and subthalamic nucleus (STN). The interelectrode spacing in each bundle was 300 µm. The interbundle spacing depends on the target coordinates for each brain region. More detailed information about microelectrode array design and manufacturing can be found in Nicolelis31, Lehew and Nicolelis32, and Dizirasa et al.33. Scale bar = 5 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Representative electrophysiological result following a successful surgery. The left panel shows spike activity of two neurons (yellow and green waveforms) recorded from one electrode. The right panel shows local field potential oscillations recorded from 14 electrodes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Nissl stained tissue section demonstrating an electrode track. This section (anteroposterior coordinate, relative to interaural line: +8.0, according to the atlas by Paxinos and Watson34) depicts an electrode track with the tip at the Putamen, as indicated by the black triangle. Scale bar = 1 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This work provides a detailed description of the procedures involved in the implantation of microelectrode recording arrays in the marmoset brain. This same protocol can be readily used when implanting electrodes, whether homemade or commercially available, in other small primates. Additionally, it can be easily adapted for other experimental ends that require precise targeting of brain structures. Therefore, this protocol is purposefully vague regarding stereotaxic coordinates and cranial drilling techniques, because those are the aspects that may vary the most. For instance, to implant the arrays used in this surgery, craniotomies were performed to open two appropriately sized windows in each hemisphere. However, when implanting sturdy, individual structures, such as guide cannulas, neither this nor the durectomy is necessary. Rather, a simple burr hole to the level of the dura will suffice. Similarly, when nonelectrical implants are involved it is not necessary for the screws to be grounded. Thus, step 3.9 in the surgical protocol can be omitted. Instead, dental acrylic can be used to simply cover the exposed skull, implant, and screws.
Regardless of the specific experimental goal of the stereotaxic neurosurgery, successful implementation of the given procedure largely revolves around good surgical practices. This means that rigorous protocols must be followed to perform the surgery under aseptic conditions in order to prevent postoperative infections35. Some of the most critical moments are inducing and removing anesthesia. It is therefore essential that the vital signs of the animal (heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and body temperature) be monitored throughout the entire surgical procedure36. If a decrease in the heart rate with a concurrent drop in oxygen saturation occurs, confirm that the chest is inflating and deflating normally, otherwise the connection to the breathing machine may be at fault. The first thing that can be done to attempt to recover the heart rate and oxygen saturation is to decrease the isoflurane concentration. If this does not resolve the issue, atropine may be administered intramuscularly to increase the heart rate and attempt to stabilize the animal. This must be done extremely cautiously, because previous experience shows that a heart rate above 200 bpm without sufficient isoflurane will awaken the animal.
Unlike rodents, in primates all coordinates are usually measured relative to the interaural coordinate, not the bregma and lambda34. Therefore, it is important to measure the interaural zero coordinates of the electrode arrays and other probes before fixing the animal’s head in the stereotaxic apparatus. Moreover, in marmosets the horizontal plane is defined as the plane passing through the lower margin of the orbital bone and the center of the external auditory meatus. Thus, it is important to align the lower surface of the orbital bone with the center of the ear bars before fixing the head in the stereotaxic frame. Furthermore, the temporal muscles of the marmoset cover a wide area of the cranium. Thus, many neural targets require craniotomies to be performed under or in very close proximity to this musculature. Because these muscles are important for marmoset communication38, the surgeon must slowly and carefully detach this musculature from the cranium to minimize damage.
Researchers familiar with behavioral work involving either rodents or marmosets should be aware of several limitations when performing electrophysiology in freely behaving NHPs. First, in the present arrangement and others involving high density arrays or multiple arrays, it is likely that inducing light anesthesia will be required to attach the cable connectors, even after appropriate habituation. This procedure, while within the scope of NIH’s and other countries’ regulatory guidelines, should be performed sparingly to reduce the mental and physical stress on the marmoset. Furthermore, it is critical that the researcher ensure the animal is fully recovered from anesthesia before beginning data acquisition, otherwise the anesthesia may confound the data39. Another related limitation is the physical presence of the cable itself. While wireless recording solutions are becoming available40, the more common wired options impose a physical restriction on the animal. Finally, the experimental chamber being used will also restrict the range of behaviors available to the marmoset. Unlike rodents, marmosets display unique behaviors (e.g., climbing) that will not be possible depending on the experimental chamber being used.
Advances in material science and engineering are leading to the novel neural interfaces41. Effective neurosurgical procedures, such as the one described in this manuscript, will allow researchers to implement these new and forthcoming tools in marmosets. Combined with the concurrent developments in molecular biology3,4,5, marmosets have the potential to allow investigations of important basic and clinical questions in neuroscience.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to thank Bernardo Luiz for technical assistance with filming and editing. This work was supported by Santos Dumont Institute (ISD), Brazilian Ministry of Education (MEC) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Equipments | |||
683 Small Animal Ventilator | Harvard Apparatus, Inc. | 55-0000 | |
Anesthesia Assembly | BRASMED | COLIBRI | |
Barber Clippers | Mundial | HC-SERIES | |
Dental Drill | Norgen | B07-201-M1KG | |
Homeothermic Heating Pad and Monitor | Harvard Apparatus, Inc. | 50-7212 | |
Marmoset Stereotaxic Frame | Narishige Scientific Instrument Lab | SR-6C-HT | |
Patient Monitor and Pulse Oximeter | Bionet Co., Ltd | BM3 | |
Stereotaxic Micromanipulator | Narishige Scientific Instrument Lab | SM-15R | |
Surgical Microscope | Opto | SM PLUS IBZ | |
Instruments | |||
Allis tissue forceps | Sklar | 36-2275 | |
Alm Retractor, rounded point, 4×4 teeth | Rhosse | RH11078 | |
Angled McPherson Forceps | Oftalmologiabr | 11301A | |
Curved Surgial Scissors | Harvard Apparatus, Inc. | 72-8422 | |
Curved Tissue Forceps | Sklar | 47-1186 | |
Delicate Dissection forceps | WPI | WP5015 | |
Dental Drill Bit | Microdont | ISO.806.314.001.524.010 | |
Essring Tissue Forceps | Sklar | 19-2460 | |
FG 1/4 Dental Drill Bit | Microdont | ISO.700.314.001.006.005 | |
Halsey Needle Holder | WPI | 15926-G | |
Halstead Mosquito forceps | WPI | 503724-12 | |
Hemostatic Forceps, Straight | Sklar | 17-1260 | |
Jewler Forceps | Sklar | 66-7436 | |
McPherson-Vannas Optathalmic microscissor, 3 mm point | Argos Instrumental | ARGOS-4004 | |
Pereosteal Raspatory | Golgran | 38-1 | |
Scalpal Handle | Harvard Apparatus, Inc. | 72-8354 | |
Screwdrivers | Eurotool | SCR-830.00 | |
Sodering Iron | Hikari | 21K006 | |
Surgical Scissor | Harvard Apparatus, Inc. | 72-8400 | |
Toothed forceps | WPI | 501266-G | |
Disposables/Single Use | |||
1 ml sterile syringe with 26 G needle | Descarpack | 7898283812785 | |
130 cm x 140 cm surgical field, presterilized | ProtDesc | 7898467276344 | |
24G Needle, presterilized | Descarpack | 7898283812846 | |
50 cm x 50 cm surgical field, presterilized | Esterili-med | 110100236 | |
Cotton Tipped Probes, Presterilized | Jiangsu Suyun Medical Materials Co. LTD | 23007 | |
Cotton tipped Qutips | Higie Topp | 7898095296063 | |
Electrode Array | Home made | ||
Endotracheal tube without cuff, internal diameter 2.0 mm, outer diameter 2.9 mm | Solidor | 7898913077201 | |
Tinned copper wire, 0.15 mm diameter | |||
M1.4×3 Stainless steel screws | USMICROSCREW | M14-30M-SS-P | |
Medical Tape | Missner | 7896544910102 | |
Nylon surgical sutures | Shalon | N540CTI25 | |
Scalpal Blade, presterilized | AdvantiVe | 1037 | |
solder | Kester | SN63PB37 | |
Sterile Saline 0.9% | Isofarma | 7898361700041 | |
Sterile Surgical Gloves | Maxitex | 7898949349051 | |
Sterile Surgical Gown | ProtDesc | 7898467281208 | |
Surgical Gauze, 15 cm x 26 cm presterilized | Héika | 7898488470315 | |
Gelfoam | Pfizer | ||
Drugs/Chemicals | |||
0.25mg/ml Atropine | Isofarma | ||
10% Lidocaine Spray | Produtos Químicos Farmacêuticos Ltda. | 7896676405644 | |
2.5% Enrofloxacino veterinary antibiotic | Chemitec | 0137-02 | |
Dexametasona Veterinary Anti inflammatory | MSD | R06177091A-00-15 | |
Hydrogen Peroxide | Farmax | 7896902211537 | |
Isoflourane | BioChimico | 7897406113068 | |
Jet Acrylic polymerization solution | Artigos Odontológicos Clássico | ||
Jet Auto Polymerizing Acrylic | Artigos Odontológicos Clássico | ||
Ketamine 10% | Syntec | ||
Lidocaine and Phenylephrine 1.8 ml local anesthetic | SS White | 7892525041049 | |
Povidone-Iodine solutiom | Farmax | 7896902234093 | |
Riohex 2% surgical Soap | Rioquímica | 7897780209418 | |
Silver Paint | SPI Supplies | 05002-AB | |
Tramadol chloride 50 mg/ml | União Química | 7896006245452 | |
Refresh gel (polyacrylic acid) | Allergan |