Tuning Oxide Properties by Oxygen Vacancy Control During Growth and Annealing

Tristan Steegemans; Shinhee Yun; Carlos N. Lobato; Eric Brand; Yunzhong Chen; Felix Trier; Dennis  V. Christensen

doi:10.3791/58737

JoVE Journal > Chemistry

化学

Tuning Oxide Properties by Oxygen Vacancy Control During Growth and Annealing

Published: June 09, 2023

doi:

10.3791/58737

Tristan Steegemans*¹, Shinhee Yun*¹, Carlos N. Lobato¹, Eric Brand¹, Yunzhong Chen², Felix Trier¹, Dennis V. Christensen¹

¹Department of Energy Conversion and Storage,Technical University of Denmark, ²Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics and Institute of Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences

Summary

Oxide materials show many exotic properties that can be controlled by tuning the oxygen content. Here, we demonstrate the tuning of oxygen content in oxides by varying the pulsed laser deposition parameters and by performing postannealing. As an example, electronic properties of SrTiO₃-based heterostructures are tuned by growth modifications and annealing.

Abstract

Electrical, optical, and magnetic properties of oxide materials can often be controlled by varying the oxygen content. Here we outline two approaches for varying the oxygen content and provide concrete examples for tuning the electrical properties of SrTiO₃-based heterostructures. In the first approach, the oxygen content is controlled by varying the deposition parameters during a pulsed laser deposition. In the second approach, the oxygen content is tuned by subjecting the samples to annealing in oxygen at elevated temperatures after the film growth. The approaches can be used for a wide range of oxides and nonoxide materials where the properties are sensitive to a change in the oxidation state.

The approaches differ significantly from electrostatic gating, which is often used to change the electronic properties of confined electronic systems such as those observed in SrTiO₃-based heterostructures. By controlling the oxygen vacancy concentration, we are able to control the carrier density over many orders of magnitude, even in nonconfined electronic systems. Moreover, properties can be controlled, which are not sensitive to the density of itinerant electrons.

Introduction

The oxygen content plays a vital role in the properties of oxide materials. Oxygen has a high electronegativity and, in the fully ionic limit, attracts two electrons from neighboring cations. These electrons are donated to the lattice when an oxygen vacancy is formed. The electrons can be trapped and form a localized state, or they can become delocalized and capable of conducting a charge current. The localized states are typically located in the band gap between the valence and conduction band with a total angular momentum that can be nonzero¹^,²^,³. The localized states can, thus, form localized magnetic moments and have a large impact on, for instance, the optical and magnetic properties¹^,²^,³. If the electrons become delocalized, they contribute to the density of itinerant charge carriers. In addition, if an oxygen vacancy or other defects are formed, the lattice adapts to the defect. The presence of defects can, thus, naturally lead to local strain fields, symmetry breaking, and a modified electronic and ionic transport in oxides.

Controlling the oxygen stoichiometry is, therefore, often key to tune, for instance, the optical, magnetic, and transport properties of oxide materials. A prominent example is that of SrTiO₃ and SrTiO₃-based heterostructures, where the ground state of the material systems is very sensitive to the oxygen content. Undoped SrTiO₃ is a nonmagnetic insulator with a band gap of 3.2 eV; however, by introducing oxygen vacancies, SrTiO₃ changes the state from insulating to metallic conducting with an electron mobility exceeding 10,000 cm²/Vs at 2 K⁴. At low temperatures (T < 450 mK), superconductivity may even be the favored ground state⁵^,⁶. Oxygen vacancies in SrTiO₃ have also been found to render it ferromagnetic⁷ and result in an optical transition in the visible spectrum from transparent to opaque². For more than a decade, there has been a large interest in depositing various oxides, such as LaAlO₃, CaZrO₃, and γ-Al₂O₃, on SrTiO₃ and examining the properties arising at the interface⁸^,⁹^,¹⁰^,¹¹^,¹²^,¹³. In some cases, it turns out that the properties of the interface differ markedly from those observed in the parent materials. An important result of the SrTiO₃-based heterostructures is that the electrons can be confined to the interface, which makes it possible to control the properties related to the density of itinerant electrons using electrostatic gating. In this way, it becomes possible to tune, for instance, the electron mobility¹⁴^,¹⁵, superconductivity¹¹, electron pairing¹⁶, and magnetic state¹⁷ of the interface, using electric fields.

The formation of the interface also enables a control of the SrTiO₃ chemistry, where the deposition of the top film on SrTiO₃ can be used to induce a redox reaction across the interface¹⁸^,¹⁹. If an oxide film with a high oxygen affinity is deposited on SrTiO₃, oxygen can transfer from the near-surface parts of SrTiO₃ to the top film, thereby reducing SrTiO₃ and oxidizing the top film (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Oxygen vacancy formation in SrTiO₃. Schematic illustration of how oxygen vacancies and electrons are formed in the interface-near region of SrTiO₃ during the deposition of a thin film with a high oxygen affinity. Reprinted figure with permission from a study by Chen et al.¹⁸. Copyright 2011 by the American Chemical Society. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

In this case, oxygen vacancies and electrons are formed near the interface. This process is expected to be the origin of the conductivity formed during the deposition at the interface between SrTiO₃ and room-temperature-grown metal films or oxides such as amorphous LaAlO₃¹⁸^,²⁰ or γ-Al₂O₃¹⁰^,²¹^,²²^,²³. Thus, the properties of these SrTiO₃-based interfaces are highly sensitive to the oxygen content at the interface.

Here, we report the use of postdeposition annealing and variations in the pulsed laser deposition parameters to control the properties in oxide materials by tuning the oxygen content. We use γ-Al₂O₃ or amorphous LaAlO₃ deposited on SrTiO₃ at room temperature as examples on how the carrier density, electron mobility, and sheet resistance can be changed by orders of magnitude by controlling the number of oxygen vacancies. The methods offer some benefits beyond those obtained with electrostatic gating, which is typically used to tune the electrical⁹^,¹¹^,¹⁴ and in some cases the magnetic¹⁵^,¹⁷ properties. These benefits include forming a (quasi-)stable final state and avoiding the use of electric fields, which requires electrical contact to the sample and may cause side effects.

In the following, we review general approaches for tuning the properties of oxides by controlling the oxygen content. This is done in two ways, namely, 1) by varying the growth conditions when synthesizing the oxide materials, and 2) by annealing the oxide materials in oxygen. The approaches can be applied to tune a range of properties in many oxide and some monoxide materials. We provide a concrete example on how to tune the carrier density at the interface of SrTiO₃-based heterostructures. Ensure that a high level of cleanliness is exercised to avoid contamination of the samples (e.g., by using gloves, tube furnaces dedicated to SrTiO₃, and nonmagnetic/acid resistant tweezers).

Protocol

1. Controlling properties by varying growth conditions

Preparation of high-quality surfaces of SrTiO₃
1. Purchase mixed terminated SrTiO₃ substrates (e.g., of 5 mm x 5 mm x 0.5 mm in size) with a typical surface angle of 0.05°–0.2° with respect to the (001) crystal planes.
  NOTE: The miscut angle determines the flatness of the surface, which is important for epitaxial growth on the substrate, as well as for the resulting properties at the interface.
2. Clean the desired number of substrates by ultrasonication in acetone for 5 min and ethanol for 5 min at room temperature in a standard ultrasonicator.
3. Ultrasonicate the substrates for 20 min at 70 °C in clean water, which dissolves SrO²⁴ or form Sr-hydroxide complexes at surface domains terminated with SrO²⁵, while leaving the chemically stable TiO₂-terminated domains unchanged²⁶.
4. Ultrasonicate the substrates in a 3:1:16 HCl:HNO₃:H₂O acidic solution (e.g., 9:3:48 mL) at 70 °C for 20 min in a fume hood to selectively etch SrO due to the basic nature of SrO surface domains, the acidity of TiO_2, and the presence of the Sr-hydroxide complexes.
5. Remove the residual acid from the substrates by ultrasonication in 100 mL of clean water for 5 min at room temperature in a fume hood.
  NOTE: TiO₂-terminated SrTiO₃ can be purchased commercially or prepared in various ways based on the selective etching of SrO on the surface²⁴^,²⁷. The conventional etching in HF also leads to TiO₂-terminated SrTiO₃, but this is avoided here due to safety concerns and a risk of unintentional F-doping of SrTiO₃²⁸.
6. Thermally treat the substrates in an atmosphere of 1 bar of oxygen for 1 h at 1,000 °C with a heating and cooling rate of 100 °C/h in a ceramic tube furnace, to relax the substrate surface into a state with low energy.
Deposition of the thin film(s) on the substrate
1. Mount the substrates on the heater or a chip carrier, depending on whether in situ transport measurements during the deposition are to be performed.
  NOTE: A silver paste that cures at room temperature can be conveniently used for substrate mounting.
2. Connect the four corners of the SrTiO₃ surface to a chip carrier electrically using, for instance, standard wedge wire bonding with 20 µm-thick Al wires, if in situ transport measurements are desired. Mount the chip carrier onto a chip carrier holder where wires connect the sample to an electrical measurement setup through a vacuum-compatible connector.
3. Place the TiO₂-terminated substrate 4.7 cm from the single-crystalline Al₂O₃ target for a typical deposition of Al₂O₃ on SrTiO₃.
4. Start sheet resistance measurements using the Van der Pauw geometry²⁹, if in situ transport measurements are to be performed.
5. Heat the substrate to 650 °C at a rate of 15 °C/min or keep the substrate at room temperature.
6. Prepare for ablating from a single-crystalline Al₂O₃ target in an oxygen pressure of 1 x 10^-5 mbar using, for instance, a nanosecond-pulsed KrF laser with a wavelength of 248 nm, a laser fluence of 3.5 J/cm², and a frequency of 1 Hz. Tune the properties using the oxygen content by using an oxygen deposition pressure in the range of 10^-6 to 10^-1 mbar or by varying other deposition parameters.
7. Deposit the desired thickness of γ-Al₂O₃ (typically 0–5 unit cells).
  NOTE: This can be determined using, for instance, reflective high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) oscillations or atomic force microscopy measurements, where the latter is measured as the height difference produced by preventing the deposition of γ-Al₂O₃ on the part of the substrate using a physical mask.
8. Cool down the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructure at a rate of 15 °C/min at the deposition pressure without performing an additional annealing step if a high-temperature deposition is done.
9. Remove the sample from the deposition chamber and stop the electrical measurements.
10. Store the sample in vacuum, nitrogen or, alternatively, at ambient conditions. The sample degradation is slowest when stored in vacuum or nitrogen²⁰.

2. Controlling properties by thermal annealing

Mount the sample with silver paste on a chip carrier.
Connect the sample electrically to the chip carrier using, for instance, wedge wire bonding of Al wires in the Van der Pauw geometry²⁹.
Connect the chip carrier electrically to the measurement equipment, using a connector and wires with thermally resistant insulation.
Start the sheet resistance measurements.
Place the chip carrier equipped with the sample in a closed furnace.
Flush thoroughly with the gas used for the annealing while checking whether the sample resistance is sensitive to a change in the atmosphere.
Anneal the sample using the desired annealing profile. Typical annealing temperatures are 50–250 °C and 100–350 °C for a-LaAlO₃/SrTiO₃ and γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructures, respectively, depending on the thickness of the top film and the desired rate of oxygen incorporation.
NOTE: Use more heat-compatible options than Al wires and standard ceramic chip carriers if temperatures above 350–400 °C are needed.
Abort the annealing when a desired change in the sheet resistance has occurred.
Cool down the sample by ramping down the temperature, or take out the sample.
Stop the electrical measurements.
NOTE: The resistance is generally temperature dependent, which must be taken into account if specific transport properties at a certain temperature are the goal.

Representative Results

Controlling properties by varying growth conditions
Varying the deposition parameters during the deposition of oxides can lead to a large change in the properties, in particular for SrTiO₃-based heterostructures, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Controlling the transport properties by tuning the top layer thickness. (a) Schematic illustration of the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructures. (b) Sheet resistance (R_s) of the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ interface as a function of the thickness of the γ-Al₂O₃ layer. (c) Sheet carrier density (n_s) as a function of the γ-Al₂O₃ layer thickness. (d) Carrier mobility (µ) as a function of the γ-Al₂O₃ layer thickness. Reprinted figure with permission from a study by Christensen et al.¹². Copyright 2016 by AIP Publishing. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Here, the thickness of γ-Al₂O₃ is varied and the resulting sheet resistance is measured after the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructure is removed from the deposition chamber. This results in a large variation in the transport behavior of the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ interface, ranging from highly insulating to metallic conducting around a critical thickness of 1-unit cell (0.8 nm). If the thickness is carefully controlled close to the critical thickness, the sheet conductance and carrier density can be tuned by several orders of magnitude. However, at room temperature, the electron mobility stays largely unchanged. A similar tuning can be found when other deposition parameters are varied, such as the substrate-to-target distance³⁰ and the oxygen partial pressure³¹.

Whereas the electron mobility stays largely unchanged at room temperature, it changes dramatically when we cool the sample to 2 K and when the γ-Al₂O₃ thickness or deposition pressure is varied (see Figure 3).

Figure 3: Controlling the electron mobility by varying the deposition parameters. The electron mobility (µ) of γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ as a function of the carrier density (n_s), tuned by varying the thickness of γ-Al₂O₃ (blue diamonds), primarily varying the oxygen partial pressure during the pulsed laser deposition (grey circles) or by performing postannealing in 1 bar of oxygen at approximately 200 °C (red circles). Reprinted figure with permission from a study by Christensen et al.³¹. Copyright 2018 by the American Physical Society. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Here, the electron mobility of the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructure reaches a value exceeding 100,000 cm²/Vs at 2 K when the γ-Al₂O₃ is deposited with a thickness of 3.5 unit cells in an oxygen partial pressure of approximately 10^-5 mbar. Raising the partial pressure or deviating from the γ-Al₂O₃ thickness results in both a decrease in the carrier density and electron mobility by two orders of magnitude.

Controlling properties by thermal annealing
The oxygen content can also be controlled using ex situ thermal annealing in oxidizing or reducing conditions. Here, the final state after annealing is determined by three parameters: the annealing time, the temperature, and the atmosphere. An example is provided in Figure 4a,b.

Figure 4: Controlling the transport properties by annealing in oxygen. Normalized sheet conductance (G_s) of the (a) γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ and (b) amorphous LaAlO₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructures as a function of the time during which the samples are annealed in 1 bar of oxygen. (c) The sheet carrier density (n_s) as a function of sheet conductance (G_s) measured at room temperature after two γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ samples have been annealed in 1 bar of oxygen at approximately 200 °C. The two samples have been synthesized using a pulsed laser deposition of γ-Al₂O₃ on SrTiO₃ using an oxygen background pressure of 10^-6 mbar and 10^-5 mbar, which leads to different initial carrier densities after the deposition. Reprinted figure with permission from a study by Christensen et al.²³. Copyright 2017 by the American Physical Society. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Here, the sheet conductance of γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ and amorphous-LaAlO₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructures is measured while the samples are annealed in 1 bar of oxygen at various temperatures. The fastest decrease in the conductance is observed for amorphous-LaAlO₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructures, and it is found that the annihilation of vacancies in SrTiO₃ occurs through the 16 nm-thick amorphous LaAlO₃ layer²³. The γ-Al₂O₃ film is, however, found to serve as a blocking layer for oxygen diffusion, and the oxygen vacancies at the SrTiO₃ side are annihilated through oxygen diffusion through SrTiO₃, leading to a more thermally resilient interface conductivity²³. The carrier density of the heterostructures can be controlled by stopping the annealing in oxygen, as shown in Figure 4c for the case of the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructure. In this case, the heterostructure is annealed in several steps at approximately 200 °C. After each step, the heterostructure is cooled down to room temperature, where the carrier density is measured. The annealing results in a controlled decrease of the carrier density, as well as in a transition from a metallic conducting to an insulating interface.

The change in the conducting state of the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ heterostructure can be used to enable different properties²³. Figure 5 shows an example.

Figure 5: Enabling the writing of conducting polymer Four-probe resistance as a function of time as conducting nanolines are attempted to be written using a conducting atomic force microscopy (c-AFM) tip. After annealing at approximately 150 °C for 3 h, conducting lines can be written at the γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ interface by applying a positive bias on the c-AFM tip and scanning on the γ-Al₂O₃ surface. When the conducting line contacts two electrodes, the resistance drops sharply. Applying a negative bias and scanning across the conducting line leads to the erasure of the polymer. Reprinted figure with permission from a study by Christensen et al.²³. Copyright 2017 by the American Physical Society. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Here, conducting nanolines can be drawn using conductive atomic force microscopy (c-AFM) only in a high resistive state. After the deposition of γ-Al₂O₃, the heterostructure is in a low resistive state, and no observable change occurs when a c-AFM tip with a positive bias scans on the γ-Al₂O₃ surface from one electrode to another. However, after annealing the heterostructure at 150 °C in air for 3 h, a high resistive state can be obtained at the interface. When the positively biased tip is scanned between the electrodes, a conducting line with a width of approximately 50 nm can be formed at the high resistive interface. When the nanoline connects the two electrodes, a sharp decrease in the resistance is observed, as reported previously³²^,³³. The nanoline can be subsequently erased by applying a negative bias on the tip and scanning across the nanoline.

Discussion

The methods described here rely on using the oxygen content to control oxide properties, and the oxygen partial pressure and operating temperature are, thus, critical parameters. If the total oxidation state of the system is tuned in a way where the system remains in a thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding atmosphere (i.e., changed pO₂ at high temperature), the changes can be reversible. However, in the case of SrTiO₃-based heterostructures, interfacial oxygen vacancies are typically formed using pulsed laser deposition, which may capture the oxidation state in a nonequilibrium state³⁴. In this case, the temperature profile and oxygen partial pressure at and after the deposition are crucial for the resulting properties. Oxygen vacancies in SrTiO₃ are typically unstable under ambient conditions²², and changes in the oxygen content induced by annealing will generally be irreversible.

Other disadvantages are the side effects from the elevated temperature or modified deposition. During elevated temperature, cation diffusion, for instance, can occur. A significant cation interdiffusion has been reported during the pulsed laser deposition of various oxides on SrTiO₃¹⁰^,³⁵^,³⁶. Controlling the oxygen content is typically done by changing the oxygen deposition pressure. Below a pressure of approximately 10^-3 mbar, the plasma plume in the pulsed laser deposition is hardly affected by the background pressure, and a change in the oxidation state of SrTiO₃ occurs by interactions with the surrounding atmosphere at elevated temperatures³⁷. When the pressure is increased from 10^-3 to 10^-1 mbar, the background gas interacts with the plasma plume, which results in oxidizing the plume, as well as lowering the kinetic energy of the plasma species³⁷. This may influence the level of cation interdiffusion as the effective temperature at the SrTiO₃ surface is lowered and plasma species arrive with lower velocities. Argon stops the plasma species approximately as efficiently as oxygen, and hence, the side effects of changing the kinetic energy can be circumvented by fixing the total deposition pressure but varying the oxygen partial pressure, using an argon/oxygen mixture³⁷. When performing annealing, cation diffusion can be avoided by annealing at temperatures high enough to allow oxygen diffusion but low enough to prevent significant cation diffusion. This is the case for the SrTiO₃-based heterostructures annealed at 100-350 °C considered here²³^,³⁶. It should, however, be noted that in some cases, cation diffusion and variations in the defect configuration induced by the deposition or postannealing can also be a desirable way to tune the oxide properties.

The two different approaches for changing the oxygen content differ from each other in several ways. Using the growth approach where the pulsed laser deposition parameters are varied, it is possible to obtain states that are either thermodynamically stable or thermally quenched in a nonequilibrium state³⁴. The annealing approach drives the sample toward thermal equilibrium at the given annealing conditions, but intermediate nonequilibrium states can also be obtained. The annealing approach, moreover, minimizes sample-to-sample variations as the properties can be tuned in a single sample, whereas different samples with varying properties are prepared according to the growth approach. On the other hand, the initial state might be lost after the annealing process.

The two approaches also differ from electrostatic gating, which is usually used to tune, in particular, the carrier density of confined electronic systems. Electrostatic gating benefits from a fast and versatile change in the electrical properties, which can often be done in situ while measuring other properties. However, the obtaining state is not permanent, a significant hysteresis may be observed, and the range in which the carrier density can be tuned is limited (typically on the order of less than 10^-12 /cm² for back-gating with ~100 V through 0.5 mm-thick SrTiO₃)¹²^,²³^,³⁸^,³⁹. Controlling the properties by tuning the oxygen vacancy content leads to a (quasi-)permanent state with large changes in the carrier density¹⁰^,²³ and the possibility to change properties that are not necessarily affected by a change in the density of itinerant electrons. Furthermore, a combination of the gating and annealing processes can utilize their respective advantages for a precise control of the interface properties.

The annealing approach is particularly compatible with a range of additional measurements besides the resistance measurements described here. These measurements can include Hall, gate, optical, and magnetic measurements, which can be used to probe the tuning of various properties. The measurements also include those where wire access or electrostatic gating is challenging, such as photoemission experiments.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Geyti from the Technical University of Denmark for his technical assistance. F. Trier acknowledges support by research grant VKR023371 (SPINOX) from VILLUM FONDEN. D. V. Christensen acknowledges the support of Novo Nordisk Foundation NERD Programme: New Exploratory Research and Discovery, Superior Grant NNF21OC0068015.

Materials

SrTiO3	Crystec	Single crystalline (001) oriented, 0.05-0.2 degree miscut angle
LaAlO3	Shanghai Daheng Optics and Fine Mechanics Co.Ltd.	Single crystalline
Al2O3	Shanghai Daheng Optics and Fine Mechanics Co.Ltd.	Single crystalline
Chemicals and gases	Standard suppliers
Silver paste	SPI Supplies, Structure Probe Inc	05001-AB, High purity silver paint
Ultrasonicator	VWR	USC500D HF45kHz/100W
Wedge wire bonder	Shenzhen Baixiangyuan Science & Technology Co.,Ltd.	HS-853A Aluminum wire bonder
Pulsed laser deposition	Twente Solid State Technologies (TSST)	PLD from TSST with software version V3.0.29, equipped with a 248 nm KrF nanosecond laser (Compex Pro 205 F) from Coherent
Resistance measurement setup	Custom made	Based on the following electrical instruments and custom written software: Keithley 6221 DC and AC current source Keithley 2182A nanovoltmeter Keithley 7001 switch system with a matrix card Keithley 6487 picoammeter
Hall measurements	Cryogenics	Based on the following electrical instruments and custom written software: Keithley 2400 DC current source Keithley 2182A nanovoltmeter Keithley 7001 switch system with a matrix card
Furnace	Custom made	Custom written software control of a FTTF 500/70 tube furnace from Scandia Ovnen AS and a eurotherm 2216e temperature controller

References

Pavlenko, N., Kopp, T., Tsymbal, E. Y., Sawatzky, G. A., Mannhart, J. Magnetic and superconducting phases at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface: The role of interfacial Ti 3d electrons. Physical Review B. 85 (2), 020407 (2012).
Schütz, P., et al. Microscopic origin of the mobility enhancement at a spinel/perovskite oxide heterointerface revealed by photoemission spectroscopy. Physical Review B. 96, 161409 (2017).
Choi, H., Song, J. D., Lee, K. -. R., Kim, S. Correlated Visible-Light Absorption and Intrinsic Magnetism of SrTiO3 Due to Oxygen Deficiency: Bulk or Surface Effect. Inorganic Chemistry. 54 (8), 3759-3765 (2015).
Frederikse, H. P. R., Hall Hosler, W. R. Mobility in SrTiO3. Physical Review. 161 (3), (1967).
Schooley, J. F., Hosler, W. R., Cohen, M. L. Superconductivity in Semiconducting SrTiO3. Physical Review Letters. 12 (17), 474-475 (1964).
Schooley, J. F., et al. Dependence of the Superconducting Transition Temperature on Carrier Concentration in Semiconducting SrTiO3. Physical Review Letters. 14 (9), 305-307 (1965).
Coey, J. M. D., Venkatesan, M., Stamenov, P. Surface magnetism of strontium titanate. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 28 (48), 485001 (2016).
Ohtomo, A., Hwang, H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature. 427 (6973), 423-426 (2004).
Thiel, S., Hammerl, G., Schmehl, A., Schneider, C. W., Mannhart, J. Tunable quasi-two-dimensional electron gases in oxide heterostructures. Science. 313 (5795), 1942-1945 (2006).
Chen, Y. Z., et al. A high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas at the spinel/perovskite interface of γ-Al2O3/SrTiO3. Nature Communications. 4, 1371 (2013).
Caviglia, A. D., et al. Electric field control of the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface ground state. Nature. 456 (7222), 624-627 (2008).
Christensen, D. V., et al. Electric field control of the γ-Al2O3/SrTiO3 interface conductivity at room temperature. Applied Physics Letters. 109 (2), 021602 (2016).
Chen, Y., et al. Creation of High Mobility Two-Dimensional Electron Gases via Strain Induced Polarization at an Otherwise Nonpolar Complex Oxide Interface. Nano Letters. 15 (3), 1849-1854 (2015).
Bell, C., et al. Dominant Mobility Modulation by the Electric Field Effect at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Interface. Physical Review Letters. 103 (22), 226802 (2009).
Niu, W., et al. Giant Tunability of the Two-Dimensional Electron Gas at the Interface of γ-Al2O3/SrTiO3. Nano Letters. 17, 6878 (2017).
Cheng, G., et al. Electron pairing without superconductivity. Nature. 521 (7551), 196-199 (2015).
Bi, F., et al. Room-temperature electronically-controlled ferromagnetism at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nature Communications. 5, (2014).
Chen, Y., et al. Metallic and Insulating Interfaces of Amorphous SrTiO3-Based Oxide Heterostructures. Nano Letters. 11 (9), 3774-3778 (2011).
Chen, Y. Z., et al. On the origin of metallic conductivity at the interface of LaAlO3/SrTiO3. Applied Surface Science. 258 (23), 9242-9245 (2012).
Trier, F., et al. Degradation of the interfacial conductivity in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures during storage at controlled environments. Solid State Ionics. 230, 12-15 (2013).
Christensen, D. V., Smith, A. Is γ-Al2O3 polar. Applied Surface Science. , 887-890 (2017).
Gunkel, F., et al. Thermodynamic Ground States of Complex Oxide Heterointerfaces. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 9 (1), 1086-1092 (2017).
Christensen, D. V., et al. Controlling the carrier density of SrTiO3-based heterostructures with annealing. Advanced Electronic Materials. 1700026. , (2017).
Connell, J. G., Isaac, B. J., Ekanayake, G. B., Strachan, D. R., Seo, S. S. A. Preparation of atomically flat SrTiO3 surfaces using a deionized-water leaching and thermal annealing procedure. Applied Physics Letters. 101 (25), 251607-251607 (2012).
Koster, G., Kropman, B. L., Rijnders, G. J., Blank, D. H., Rogalla, H. Quasi-ideal strontium titanate crystal surfaces through formation of strontium hydroxide. Applied Physics Letters. 73 (20), 2920-2922 (1998).
Komiyama, M., Gu, M. Atomic force microscopy images of MgO (100) and TiO2 (110) under water and aqueous aromatic molecule solutions. Applied Surface Science. 120 (100), 125-128 (1997).
Kawasaki, M., et al. Atomic control of the SrTiO3 crystal surface. Science. 266 (5190), 1540-1542 (1994).
Chambers, S. A., Droubay, T. C., Capan, C., Sun, G. Y. Unintentional F doping of SrTiO3(001) etched in HF acid-structure and electronic properties. Surface Science. 606 (001), 554-558 (2012).
vander Pauw, L. J. A method of measuring specific resistivity and Hall effect of discs of arbitrary shape. Philips Research Reports. 13, 1-9 (1958).
Chen, Y. Z., et al. Room Temperature Formation of High-Mobility Two-Dimensional Electron Gases at Crystalline Complex Oxide Interfaces. Advanced Materials. 26, (2013).
Christensen, D. V., et al. Electron Mobility in γ-Al2O3/SrTiO3. Physical Review Applied. 9 (5), 054004 (2018).
Cen, C., et al. Nanoscale control of an interfacial metal-insulator transition at room temperature. Nature Materials. 7 (4), 298-302 (2008).
Cen, C., Thiel, S., Mannhart, J., Levy, J. . Oxide Nanoelectronics on Demand. Science. 323 (5917), 1026-1030 (2009).
Xu, C., et al. Disentanglement of growth dynamic and thermodynamic effects in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. Scientific Reports. 6, 22410 (2016).
Chambers, S. A. Understanding the mechanism of conductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3(001) interface. Surface Science. 605 (001), 1133-1140 (2011).
Nakagawa, N., Hwang, H. Y., Muller, D. A. Why some interfaces cannot be sharp. Nature Materials. 5 (3), 204-209 (2006).
Sambri, A., et al. Plasma plume effects on the conductivity of amorphous-LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces grown by pulsed laser deposition in O2. and Ar. Applied Physics Letters. 100 (23), 231605 (2012).
Biscaras, J., et al. Limit of the electrostatic doping in two-dimensional electron gases. of LaXO3(X = Al, Ti)/SrTiO3. Scientific Reports. 4, 6788 (2014).
Christensen, D. V., et al. Controlling interfacial states in amorphous/crystalline LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures by electric fields. Applied Physics Letters. 102 (2), 021602 (2013).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite This Article

Steegemans, T., Yun, S., Lobato, C. N., Brand, E., Chen, Y., Trier, F., Christensen, D. V. Tuning Oxide Properties by Oxygen Vacancy Control During Growth and Annealing. J. Vis. Exp. (196), e58737, doi:10.3791/58737 (2023).