This protocol describes two different environmental manipulations and a concurrent brain infusion protocol to study environmentally-induced brain changes underlying adaptive behavior and brain repair in adult mice.
Long-lasting changes in the brain or ‘brain plasticity’ underlie adaptive behavior and brain repair following disease or injury. Furthermore, interactions with our environment can induce brain plasticity. Increasingly, research is trying to identify which environments stimulate brain plasticity beneficial for treating brain and behavioral disorders. Two environmental manipulations are described which increase or decrease the number of tyrosine hydroxylase immunopositive (TH+, the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine (DA) synthesis) neurons in the adult mouse midbrain. The first comprises pairing male and female mice together continuously for 1 week, which increases midbrain TH+ neurons by approximately 12% in males, but decreases midbrain TH+ neurons by approximately 12% in females. The second comprises housing mice continuously for 2 weeks in ‘enriched environments’ (EE) containing running wheels, toys, ropes, nesting material, etc., which increases midbrain TH+ neurons by approximately 14% in males. Additionally, a protocol is described for concurrently infusing drugs directly into the midbrain during these environmental manipulations to help identify mechanisms underlying environmentally-induced brain plasticity. For example, EE-induction of more midbrain TH+ neurons is abolished by concurrent blockade of synaptic input onto midbrain neurons. Together, these data indicate that information about the environment is relayed via synaptic input to midbrain neurons to switch on or off expression of ‘DA’ genes. Thus, appropriate environmental stimulation, or drug targeting of the underlying mechanisms, might be helpful for treating brain and behavioral disorders associated with imbalances in midbrain DA (e.g. Parkinson’s disease, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, and drug addiction).
DArgic signaling by neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) of the midbrain is thought to be important for reward-motivated cognitive, emotive and motor behaviors. However, too much or too little midbrain DA signaling causes many disabling symptoms in a variety of neurological disorders (e.g. Parkinson’s disease, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, and drug addiction). Drugs that increase or decrease DA signaling alleviate these symptoms, however they also produce side-effects attributable to dysregulated signaling and off-target effects. Drug efficacy also declines over time due to compensatory responses of the brain. The challenge therefore is to restore normal midbrain DA signaling in a more targeted and physiological way, and a favored approach is by increasing or decreasing the number of midbrain DA neurons.
Evidence has been accumulating for several decades that the expression of genes and proteins involved in metabolizing and trafficking DA and other catecholamines in mature adult cells is modifiable (reviewed in1). In midbrain, the number of tyrosine hydroxylase immunopositive (TH+, the rate-limiting enzyme in DA synthesis) neurons decreases then increases following neurotoxin administration2,3, while the number of TH immunonegative (TH-) neurons shows the opposite pattern (i.e. increases then decreases3). This is consistent with loss then gain of the ‘DA phenotype’ by some cells. The number of TH+ and TH- SNc neurons has also been shown to change in equal but opposite directions following various treatments that alter the electrical activity of these cells4,5. For example, infusion of the small-conductance, calcium-activated potassium (SK) channel antagonist apamin into midbrain for 2 weeks decreases the number of TH+ and increases (by the same amount) the number of TH- SNc neurons4,5. In contrast, infusion of the SK channel agonist 1-EBIO increases the number of TH+ and decreases (by the same amount) the number of TH- SNc neurons4,5. Similar changes were seen following a variety of treatments targeting SNc neuronal activity, including some which targeted afferent inputs4. This apparent regulation of the number of SNc DArgic neurons by neuronal activity and afferent input raises the possibility that the environment or behavior can influence the number of SNc neurons. Indeed adult mice exposed to different environments have more or less midbrain (SNc and VTA) TH+ neurons, and at least some of these environment-induced changes are abolished by concurrent blockade of synaptic input in midbrain6. The aims of this communication are to: (1) provide further details about how to implement our environmental manipulations and drug infusions; and (2) provide further data supporting our contention that the environment regulates the number of midbrain DA neurons, via afferent input.
NOTE: All experimental procedures on animals were approved by the Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health Animal Ethics Committee and conform to Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council published code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes (7th edition, 2004).
1. Environmental Manipulations
2. Osmotic Pump and Brain Infusion Cannula Implants for Drug Infusion
3. Brain Tissue Preparation, Immunohistochemical Processing, and Stereology
Adult mice subjected to these environmental manipulations have altered numbers of midbrain (SNc and VTA), but not LC, TH+ neurons, and EE plus concurrent midbrain infusion of either picrotoxin or bicuculline (GABAA receptor antagonists) abolishes EE-induction of more SNc TH+ neurons. These data were previously published in6. The present data were compiled in replicate experiments performed as part of that previous study, but have not been published elsewhere.
Specifically, adult male mice that have been paired with adult female mice have more TH+ SNc and VTA (midbrain) neurons than males paired with males, whereas females paired with males have fewer TH+ SNc and VTA neurons than females paired with females (Figure 1 in6). Another example of this is provided here in Figure 1, which shows the mean ± SE number of TH+ SNc neurons in male and female mice immediately following gender pairing. Males paired with females for 7 days have approximately 12% more TH+ SNc neurons than males paired with males (two blue columns in Figure 1). By contrast, females paired with males have approximately 12% fewer TH+ SNc neurons than females paired with females (two red columns in Figure 1).
The number of TH+ SNc and VTA neurons also increases in adult male mice subject to EE (Figure 2 in6), and EE-induction of more SNc TH+ neurons is abolished by concurrent blockade of midbrain GABAA receptors (Figure 3 in6). Another example of this is provided here in Figure 2, where EE with vehicle infusion resulted in approximately 14% more TH+ SNc neurons than SH with vehicle infusion (left two columns in Figure 2). However, EE with GABAA receptor antagonist infusion (either 10 µM picrotoxin or 5 µM bicuculline) completely abolished this increase (right two columns in Figure 2). Note, these data are from the SNc contralateral to the infusion cannula, and are almost identical to the effects observed in the ipsilateral SNc which were reported in6.
Figure 1: Effects of gender pairing on the number of SNc TH+ neurons. Immediately following 7 days of gender pairing (protocol 1.1) adult mice were perfused (3.1), their midbrain was sectioned (3.2), sections were processed for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, the rate limiting enzyme in DA synthesis) immunohistochemistry (3.3), and the numbers of TH+ SNc neurons were estimated using stereology (3.4). Plotted here are the mean ± SE number of SNc TH+ neurons in male mice paired with male mice (n = 4 male mice from n = 2 male-male pairs, light blue column), males paired with females (n = 6 male mice from 6 male-female pairs, dark blue column), females paired with females (n = 8 female mice from n = 4 female-female pairs, light red column), and females paired with males (n = 6 female mice from n = 6 male-female pairs, dark red column). Pairing with the opposite gender resulted in an increase in number of SNc TH+ neurons in males but a decrease in number of SNc TH+ neurons in females (p <0.001 One-way ANOVA; *p <0.05 Tukey pairwise multiple comparisons).
Figure 2: Effects of environment enrichment with midbrain GABAA receptor blockade on the number of SNc TH+ neurons. Immediately following 14 days of environment enrichment (protocol 1.2) with concurrent infusion of either vehicle, the GABAA receptor antagonist picrotoxin (10 µM), or the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline (5 µM) into the left midbrain (protocol 2), adult male mice were perfused (3.1), their midbrain was sectioned (3.2), sections were processed for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, the rate limiting enzyme in DA synthesis) immunohistochemistry (3.3), and the numbers of TH+ neurons in the right (contralateral) SNc were estimated using stereology (3.4). Plotted here are the mean ± SE number of SNc TH+ neurons in standard housed (SH) male mice with vehicle infusion (n = 6, light blue column), environment enriched (EE) males with vehicle infusion (n = 6, first dark blue column), EE males with picrotoxin infusion (n = 6, second dark blue column), and EE males with bicuculline infusion (n = 6, third dark blue column). EE resulted in an increase in number of SNc TH+ neurons, but this was abolished by infusion of picrotoxin or bicuculline into the contralateral midbrain (p <0.001 One-way ANOVA; *p <0.001 Tukey pairwise multiple comparisons).
Environmental manipulations
The motivation behind the design of these environmental manipulations (gender pairing and environmental enrichment) was to determine whether the environment, and/or behavior prompted by the environment, is associated with changes in the number of midbrain DA neurons. The focus was therefore on providing environments and stimulating behaviors that are likely to engage midbrain DA signaling. These included pairing with the opposite gender, and environmental enrichment comprising access to running wheels, ropes, ladders, tunnels, and objects to explore, play, climb, hide, and nest. Both of these environments ought to foster reward-motivated cognitive, emotive and motor behaviors, which have been associated with acute increases in midbrain DA neuronal discharge and DA release (e.g.8). Our hypothesis was they are also associated with longer-lasting changes in midbrain DA signaling brought about by changes in the number of midbrain DA neurons. Here and elsewhere6, evidence is presented that this is indeed the case.
Our investigations began using the gender pairing protocol (1.1) because it comprises a core primal and essential reward-motivated behavior (i.e. copulation). Also, reproductive, pair-bonding, and social behaviors are known to induce analogous changes in other neurochemical systems (e.g. changes in density of oxytocin, vasopressin and corticotrophin-releasing hormone cells in hypothalamus9). Indeed, after 7 days of continuous pairing with the opposite gender, we show here and elsewhere6 that males have approximately 10% more TH+ midbrain neurons whereas females have approximately 10% fewer TH+ midbrain neurons [Note: These effects comprise SNc (present study and6) and VTA6, but not the locus coeruleus6, where TH helps synthesize noradrenaline]. This supports the notion that the number of midbrain DA neurons in the adult brain is not fixed, but changes depending on the environment, behavior, or environment/behavior interactions. Other evidence argues these changes are brought about by changes in expression of the TH gene and protein in extant midbrain neurons, as opposed to DA neurogenesis or degeneration. (1) DA neurogenesis in the adult mouse midbrain occurs either not at all10-14, or at rates much lower than can account for the addition of approximately 500 new SNc DA neurons in a week15,16. (2) Studies quantifying changes in number of SNc neurons following 2 week infusions of various drugs targeting the electrical activity of midbrain neurons have consistently revealed equal (again approximately 10%) but opposite changes TH+ and TH- cells, resulting in no net change in the total cell number4,5. This is consistent with regulation of TH protein levels above or below immunohistochemically detectable levels without addition or subtraction of neurons. (3) Many studies have reported activity-dependent changes in TH gene and protein expression within cells over a timescale of several hours17-23, and the same has been reported in midbrain4.
The question thus arises what are the mechanisms underlying changes in expression of the TH gene and protein in extant midbrain neurons. Possibilities include sex steroids, which may underlie both the baseline differences in number of TH+ midbrain neurons in males and females, as well gender-specific changes (increases in males and decreases in females) following pairing reported here and previously6. Another possibility is activity-dependent regulation of TH expression. SNc and VTA neurons (both DA and non-DA) receive synaptic input predominantly from the striatum, hypothalamus, subthalamic nucleus, and frontal cortices24. In the context of gender pairing, these inputs could be regulated by sensorimotor behavior, olfaction, pheromones, stress, metabolism, or reproduction. Activity-dependent regulation of TH expression could be mediated via calcium or neuropeptide signaling pathways affecting gene and protein expression (e.g.1).
To help distinguish between sex steroid versus activity-dependent mechanisms underlying the effects of gender pairing on the number of midbrain DA neurons we employed the environment enrichment protocol (1.2), which better controls against the potential influence of sex steroids and perhaps also other hormones (e.g. pheromones, stress, reproduction), and for the potential influence of afferent-driven neuronal activity. The relevant factor here is the different groups were much more similar in terms of gender (all males), hormones, social status and stress. Although social status and stress may still differ between groups (e.g. a more dominant and aggressive male in one group), it is unlikely this would always be the same group (e.g. EE), and the effects of EE have now been replicated multiple times6. In EE, the magnitude of the increase in midbrain TH+ neurons was the same as in the gender pairing protocol (compare males in Figures 1 & 2 present study, and Figures 1 & 2 in6). Furthermore, the EE-induced increase in SNc TH+ neurons induced by environmental enrichment was completely abolished by concurrent blockade of midbrain GABAA receptors (Figure 2 present study and Figure 3 in6), which provide around 70% of all afferent input to midbrain DA neurons25. Together, these data indicate afferent-driven neural activity is at least as potent an influence over the number of midbrain DA neurons as hormones.
Further insight into the environmental factors regulating the number of midbrain TH+ neurons comes from comparing the effects of RW and EE. RW comprises a well-learned or banal motor activity (running on the wheels), whereas EE comprises a similar amount of such activity, albeit of greater variety (i.e. various toys but unchanged throughout the 14 days), plus ongoing exposure to novel toys in the SE component (1.2.4). Our previously published data6 revealed either no or small increases in SNc and VTA TH+ neurons in RW compared to SH mice, but much larger increases in EE (+SE) mice. This highlights sensory stimulation, cognition, novelty and/or learning and memory as more potent regulators of the number of midbrain DA neurons than banal physical activity alone.
EE has been used extensively to induce therapeutic effects and enhance brain repair in various animal models of brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s and Parkinson’s disease26. The nature of such environmental manipulations is that they vary extensively between laboratories (as do ‘standard-housed’ conditions), however there are key aspects of EE protocols that are noteworthy and have been previously discussed27. EE provides increased environmental novelty and complexity relative to standard housing, so as to enhance levels of sensory stimulation, cognitive activity and physical exercise. In designing EE experiments, one needs to consider ethological factors, including the sensory and cognitive abilities of the animals and their instinctive drives. As mice (and rats) are nocturnal, with inferior visual abilities to humans but excellent somatosensory and olfactory acuities, the enrichment objects should reflect the innate instincts and capacities of the experimental animals. Therefore, it is the novelty, shape, texture and smell of the objects that may be particularly salient to mice. Assessments of the relative strength of rodents’ motivations for a variety of enrichment objects have led to recommendations for the inclusion of chewable objects to allow the opportunity to exercise fundamental, species-typical behaviors28,29. The provision of nesting material is considered to be a fundamental component of the enrichment protocol and mice will instinctively tear any objects made of paper or cardboard, thus providing opportunity for sensory, cognitive and motor activities30,31. It is important also that in an experiment with multiple EE cages, the equivalent novelty and complexity of objects is provided, to minimize variance within the EE group, and similar control of environmental parameters should be exercised for the SH group. Ideally, the numbers of mice per cage should be the same between EE and SH groups (unless the effects of social group size are being specifically investigated), and no ‘food treats’ should be used in EE, as any dietary differences between groups could confound the interpretation of the effects of the cognitive activity and physical exercise that EE enhances12. Other key considerations are the duration of exposure to an enriched environment and the age at which enrichment commences. While differential expression of genes has been shown after only 3 hr in an enriched environment32, longer periods of exposure may be required for structural and functional changes to occur33,34. Furthermore, enrichment-induced plasticity may be enhanced during postnatal critical developmental periods35.
Osmotic pump and brain infusion cannula implants for drug infusions
The osmotic pump and cannula implants are very effective for delivering drugs directly into brain. With experience, the implant surgery takes approximately 1 hr per mouse. Dental acrylic alone is adequate to fix the cannula in place for extended periods (Note: We have gone up to 28 days in other experiments); there is no need for additional attachment hardware such as bone screws. It is important to ensure there is plenty of slack in the tube connecting the pump and cannula to allow for maximal head and neck flexion without putting too much stress on the connections. This is particularly so for longer-term infusions, where growth of connective tissue around the pump can anchor it in place thereby reducing the flexibility of the implant. Where possible, mice are also single-housed following surgery to prevent housemates damaging the implant through scratching, pulling or biting. The dose of drug is largely determined by the amount added to the pump. However, in this respect attention should also be paid to the pump flow-rate, the chemical stability of the drug at 37 °C, and the rate of diffusion of the drug from the cannula through the brain. Currently available pumps from our supplier can maintain infusion for up to 6 weeks at a flow-rate of 0.15 µl/hr; the fastest available flow-rate is 10 µl/hr but lasting for only 1 week. Longer infusion times can be achieved by performing additional minor surgeries to replace depleted pumps with full pumps on the back of the connecting tube (i.e. without disturbing the implanted cannula). The spatial extent of methylene blue (1% methylene blue, MW 320, in 0.9% NaCl) diffusion from a cannula tip implanted 0.3 mm above the left SNc midway along its mediolateral aspect was measured to extend from the lateral edge of the midbrain to just across the midline mediolaterally, and throughout the entire dorsoventral extent of the midbrain (after 2 weeks of infusion). This is much more widespread than a small nucleus like SNc, and the spread of drug may be larger (or smaller) depending on its MW, chemical stability, buffering, etc. Indeed, one can infer from the present data (Figure 2) that both picrotoxin and bicuculline reached the contralateral SNc in biologically active concentrations.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Project grant 1022839. AJH is an Australian Research Council (ARC) FT3 Future Fellow (FT100100835). The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health acknowledges support from the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Grant.
Name of Material/ Equipment | Company | Catalog Number | Comments/Description |
Isofluorane | Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd, Baxter Drive, NSW 2146, Australia | AHN3640 | |
ALZET Osmotic pump 1002 | DURECT Corporation, PO Box 530 Cupertino, CA 95015-0530 | 0004317 | |
ALZET Brain infusion kit 1 | DURECT Corporation, PO Box 530 Cupertino, CA 95015-0530 | 0004760 | |
ALZET cannula holder 1 | DURECT Corporation, PO Box 530 Cupertino, CA 95015-0530 | 0008860 | |
Vertex Monomer Self-curing (dental acrylic solvent) | Vertex Dental, Postbus 10, 3700 AA ZEIST, The Netherlands | n/a | |
Vertex Self Curing (dental acrylic powder) | Vertex Dental, Postbus 10, 3700 AA ZEIST, The Netherlands | n/a | |
METACAM (Meloxicam) | Troy Laboratories, 98 long Street, smithfield NSW 2164 Australia | L10100 | |
Sodium Pentobarbitone | Lethabarb, Virbac, Milperra, NSW, Australia | 571177 | |
Normal goat serum | chemicon-temecula, CA | S26-Litre | |
Triton X-100 | Merck Millipore Headquarters , 290 Concord road, Billerica, MA 01821 | 1.08603.1000 | |
Polyclonal rabbit anti-tyrosine hydroxylase | Merck Millipore Headquarters , 290 Concord road, Billerica, MA 01821 | AB152 | |
Polyclonal biotinylated goat anti-rabbit | Dako Australia Pty. Ltd., Suite 4, Level 4, 56 Berry street, North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060 | EO432 | |
Avidin peroxidase | Sigma-aldrich, Castle Hill, NSW 1765 AU | A3151-1mg | |
Diamino-benzidine | Sigma-aldrich, Castle Hill, NSW 1765 AU | D-5637 | |
Stereo Investigator | MicroBrightField Bioscience, 185 Allen Brook Lane, Suite 101, Williston, VT 05495 | n/a |