Science Education
>

Easy Manipulation of Architectures in Protein-based Hydrogels for Cell Culture Applications

Instructor Prep
concepts
Student Protocol
JoVE Journal
Biochemistry
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Journal Biochemistry
Easy Manipulation of Architectures in Protein-based Hydrogels for Cell Culture Applications

1. Hydrogel Preparation

  1. Mix 200 mg of BSA with 1 mL of deionized H2O to create 20% (w/v) BSA stock (stock solution A).
  2. Mix 165 µL of THPC solution (134 mg/mL) with 4.835 mL of deionized water to create THPC stock solution (stock solution B).
  3. Weigh 1 mg of KCSSGKSRGDS (1,111.1 g/mol) peptide (or an equivalent cell-adhesive peptide) and dilute it in 100 µL of sterile H2O to obtain a 10 mg/mL solution (stock solution C).
    NOTE: This step is optional and only needs to be included if the hydrogel is meant for cell culture application.
  4. Remove the bottom of a 96-well plate and replace it with removable plastic wrap.
    NOTE: For the plates used here, the bottom can easily be removed by applying pressure to the bottom of each well; the thin plastic bottom will simply fall out.
  5. Mix 100 µL of BSA stock solution (A) and 100 µL of THPC stock solution (B) (optional: 4 µL of stock solution C for functionalized, cell-adhesive hydrogels) in the 96-well plate to obtain 200 µL of hydrogel. Mix the components by pipetting up and down at least 5 times to guarantee a uniform hydrogel after polymerization.
  6. Place the 96-well plate at room temperature (RT) for about 10 min until all hydrogels are properly polymerized.
  7. Carefully and slowly remove the plastic wrap from the bottom of the plate.
  8. Press the hydrogels out of the 96-well plate using a small stamp and transfer them to 1.5 mL tubes with sterile PBS, pH 7.4.
    NOTE: The hydrogels have a cylindrical shape, with a diameter of approximately 4 mm and a height of 8 mm.
  9. Store the hydrogels in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4 °C for up to several months.

2. Freeze-drying the Hydrogels

  1. Fill 1.5 mL tubes with 500 µL of sterile deionized H2O and remove the cap. Transfer the hydrogels to the 1.5 mL reaction tubes using a spatula.
  2. Wrap the 1.5 mL tubes tightly with paraffin film-at least three layers for each vial. Use a needle to pierce small holes in the film to enable gas release from the tube.
  3. Proceed to one of the following steps:
    1. Transfer the vial to liquid nitrogen solution for 5 min to guarantee that the water and hydrogel completely freeze. Immediately after removal from the liquid nitrogen, transfer the vials to the freeze dryer to prevent the material from thawing.
      NOTE: This procedure results in pores about 10-15 µm in radius.
    2. Keep the vials at -20 °C overnight to slowly freeze the hydrogels. Immediately after removal from -20 °C, transfer the vials to the freeze dryer to prevent the material from thawing.
      NOTE: This procedure results in pores about 50-60 µm in radius.
  4. After 24 h (and the complete evaporation of the water in and around the hydrogel), thaw the material by removing it from the freeze dryer.
    NOTE: The pore sizes can be analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy (step 5, "Hydrogel Visualization").

3. Particle Leaching

  1. Prepare the hydrogel as described in steps 1.1-1.5.
  2. Directly after mixing the components, add NaCl until saturation occurs (36 mg/mL). Add salt until a salt crystal can be seen in the solution as a white precipitate.
  3. Transfer the 96-well plate to a shaker and shake until polymerization takes place (about 10 min). Remove the hydrogels from the plate, as described in steps 1.7-1.8.
  4. Incubate the hydrogels for at least 24 h at RT in sterile water on a shaker (20 rpm) to elute all salt from the hydrogel template. Store the hydrogels at 4 °C in PBS for up to several months.

4. Channel Formation

  1. Prepare hydrogels as described in step 1. Remove a hydrogel from solution using a pincer, remove the excess water with highly absorbent paper, and place it on top of a block of dry ice.
  2. Freeze the hydrogel for 30 s and carefully remove it from the block. Do not damage the hydrogel; carefully use a spatula to scrape it off the block. Transfer the hydrogel to a 1.5 mL tube and dry it overnight at 37 °C.

5. Hydrogel Visualization

  1. Prepare a rhodamine B stock solution by diluting 1 mg of rhodamine B in 10 mL of PBS. Prepare a serial dilution by diluting the rhodamine stock solution in PBS until a concentration of 0.001 mg/mL is reached (dilution factor: 100)
  2. Remove the hydrogel from the storage solution (e.g., from step 2.4.) and transfer it to a 1.5 mL tube with 1 mL of 0.01 mg/mL rhodamine B solution. Stain the hydrogel overnight in rhodamine B solution at RT.
  3. The next day, transfer the hydrogel that is to be visualized to 10 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) and wash for at least 3 h.
  4. Transfer the hydrogel onto a µ-slide 8 well and cover it with PBS.
  5. Cut small slices out of the hydrogel (about 0.5 mm in height) using a blade.
  6. Using a confocal laser scanning microscope, visualize the hydrogel at a wavelength of 514 nm (objective: EC Plan-Neofluar 40x/1.30 Oil DIC M27, plane scan mode: 514 nm, and zoom: 1X).

6. Cell Culture Feasibility

  1. Sterile-filter all stock solutions (A, B, and C) with a 0.45 µm filter.
  2. Prepare the hydrogel as described in steps 1.1-1.4, including the cell-adhesive peptide prior to hydrogel polymerization.
  3. After mixing the components, immediately pipette the mixture into a µ-slide 8 well until the bottom is completely covered.
    NOTE: This step must be performed quickly and directly after mixing the components, as polymerization takes place within minutes in the slide.
  4. Culture adhesion cells and passage to obtain a single-cell suspension using standard cell culture techniques. Transfer the cells into pre-warmed, sterile DMEM cell culture medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS, 10% (w/v)), penicillin-streptomycin (1% (w/v)), and nonessential amino acid solution (MEM, 1% (w/v)).
  5. Count the cells with a Neubauer counting chamber and carefully pipette 200 µL of the desired number of cells (2 x 105 cells/cm2) onto the hydrogel surface.
  6. Cover the µ-slide 8 well with the lid and transfer it to an incubator (37 °C, 5% CO2). Incubate for at least 4 h at 37 °C.
  7. After at least 4 h of cellular attachment, wash the cells twice with 200 µL of sterile cell culture PBS.
  8. Fix the cells with 200 µL of 3.7% (v/v) formaldehyde for 10 min at RT and wash twice with PBS (~200 µL).
    NOTE: Wear appropriate personal protective equipment when handling formaldehyde.
  9. Permeabilize the cells with 200 µL of 0.1 % Triton X for 5 min. Wash twice with PBS.
  10. Stain the cells with phalloidin-rhodamine by mixing 5 µL of methanolic stock with 195 µL of PBS and adding it to the cells at RT. Stain the cells for 20 min in the dark. Wash twice with PBS.
  11. Investigate the cell adhesion properties using a confocal microscope at 514 nm (objective: EC Plan-Neofluar 40x/1.30 Oil DIC M27, plane scan mode: 514 nm, and zoom: 1X). Analyze the images using appropriate software (see the Table of Materials).

7. Hydrogel Properties

  1. Swelling ratio.
    1. Completely dry the hydrogels at 37 °C for at least one day.
    2. Weigh each hydrogel and note the exact weight.
    3. Fill a 2 mL reaction tube with 1.5 mL of PBS.
    4. Transfer the hydrogel into this 2 mL reaction tube and completely immerse it in PBS.
    5. Leave the hydrogel for at least two days in PBS at RT to reach equilibrium with the PBS.
    6. After three days, remove the hydrogel from the solution and dry it with a paper tissue to remove excess water from the hydrogel surface.
    7. Weigh the hydrogel.
    8. Calculate the swelling ratio using the following formula:
      Equation
      where Wd is the weight of the dried gel (step 7.1.2.) and Ws is the weight of the wet gel (step 7.1.7). Multiply with 100 to get the swelling ratio percent.
  2. pH and temperature stability.
    1. Transfer 5 mL of PBS to a 15-mL reaction tube.
    2. Adjust the solution to the appropriate pH (e.g., pH 2, 7, or 10) with NaOH and HCl. Bring the solution to the appropriate temperature (e.g., RT, 37 °C, or 80 °C).
    3. Transfer the hydrogel that is to be investigated for its stability into the appropriate solution. Readjust the pH if necessary.
      NOTE: All hydrogels should be completely swollen at this point (see the swelling ratio) to prevent the incorrect interpretation of the weight due to the swelling of the material.
    4. After certain time intervals, remove the hydrogel from the solution (e.g., each hour for up to 2 days), dry it with a highly absorbent paper tissue to remove excess water, and weigh it.
  3. Enzymatic degradation.
    1. Prepare a stock enzyme solution of 300 U trypsin and pepsin, as per the manufacturer's instructions.
    2. Transfer the hydrogel (e.g., from step 1.8) to the appropriate solution.
      NOTE: All hydrogels should be completely swollen at this point to prevent the incorrect interpretation of the weight.
    3. After certain time intervals, remove the hydrogel from the solution (e.g., each hour), dry it with a highly absorbent paper tissue to remove excess water, and weigh it.

Easy Manipulation of Architectures in Protein-based Hydrogels for Cell Culture Applications

Learning Objectives

Hydrogel development has become one of the most prominent fields in material research-related biological studies, with thousands of entries indexed in scientific research archives. Although the behavior of many systems is well studied, the manipulation of 3D networks, especially of sensitive protein-based materials, is often a major issue in material science. Another commonly underestimated challenge is the correct measurement of the native structure of a material using cryo electron microscopy. This is because the sample preparation (i.e., drying) process often changes the hydrogel properties. To overcome this problem, the material samples here were analyzed using confocal microscopy, a method that allows for the characterization of the material in its native, water-swollen state. Rhodamine B can bind to the hydrogel backbone via electrostatic interaction and facilitates the visualization of the material. To investigate the feasibility of a freeze-drying approach to modify this protein-based system, hydrogels were subsequently polymerized and frozen at 196 °C in liquid nitrogen and at -20 °C. The results show a clear influence of the freezing temperature on the resulting pore sizes. At -196 °C, small pores with a radius of about 10 µm and a narrow size distribution were produced. On the other hand, freezing at higher temperatures leads to the production of materials with much larger pores, whose radii are between 50 and 70 µm, as seen in Figure 1. The slow freezing process leads to the formation of larger ice crystals, which results in bigger pores within the material after the sublimation of the ice.

Another technique for pore generation, which is well-described for synthetic materials, is particle leaching. Solid particles like paraffin, gelatin, salt, or another solid-state material, are incorporated into the hydrogel prior to solidification. They are then eluted from the solid hydrogel by changing external conditions, such as temperature, Ph, or buffer composition by dilution. The BSA-based hydrogel was polymerized in the presence of high salt concentrations. After the sol-to-gel transition, salt crystals were removed from the material by adding an excess of water to dilute the crystals. This was followed by the confocal analysis of the resulting materials. The size of the salt crystals was changed by grinding NaCl with a mortar and pestle. As shown in Figure 2, the pore size can be tremendously changed using this method. Depending upon the crystals used (untreated or ground for a certain time), pore sizes from 10 to 70 µm could be produced. Appropriately sized pores are essential for many applications that feature the incorporation of cells into a hydrogel. However, more sophisticated structures might be needed when the creation of more complex structures is desired (e.g., to provide structural guidance for neuronal cells along a gradient). Complex architectures can often only be produced with special equipment (e.g., spin coating, electrospinning, lithographic, or bioprinting techniques). However, the production of linear channels can be realized with a simple freeze-drying approach and the use of dry ice. The channels produced have radii of about 20-30 µm and lengths of several hundreds of micrometers, as shown in Figure 3.

Another crucial feature of hydrogels is the biodegradability of the template matrix, both in vivo and in vitro1. Protein hydrogels offer the advantage of being biodegradable. However, many systems lack fast degradation due to the restricted target sites within the material. Proteolytic agents must work their way from the outside of a material to the inside, resulting in very slow degradation times. In contrast, macroporous hydrogels are normally well-diffusible. This allows enzymes to target protein structures throughout the whole template simultaneously, which greatly reduces degradation times. For the presented protein-based hydrogel, the proteolytic degradation time depends mainly on the pore sizes within the matrix. A representative degradation kinetic is shown in Figure 4. Pore generation reduces the time from several days to a few hours for trypsin and pepsin degradation, as shown in Table 1.

The main benefit of hydrogels is the high water content within the materials, which is desirable to mimic the extracellular matrix27. The swelling ratio represents the amount of water a gel can absorb and hold after drying and is a valid indicator of the free water content of a macroporous hydrogel. Furthermore, diffusion depends strongly upon the free water content and is required for the transport of nutrients towards the cells and the removal of toxic metabolites. The swelling ratio correlates directly with the pore size within the material, as shown in Table 1. By changing the pore size using the demonstrated methods, it is possible to alter the diffusion behavior in the template and thus to influence cell fate by manipulating their feed.

The stability of a hydrogel to external stimuli, such as pH and temperature changes, severely limits or expands the possible applications of a system. Particularly for application in a cell culture-related area, resistance to changes in the external parameters is essential, as cells and cell culture matrix mutually influence their properties and behavior (e.g., the acidification of the medium might lead to hydrogel degradation, and hydrogel degradation leads to cell release or death)22. To demonstrate the feasibility of the methods described here for pore generation, all hydrogel stabilities were determined for increasing temperatures (37 °C and 80 °C) and changing pH values (pH 2, 7, and 10). The residual weights of the hydrogels, which were treated using different methods, are summarized in Table 1. In conclusion, the presented protein-based hydrogels are stable over a wide range of conditions, while the residual weights of the hydrogels at high temperatures only reduce gradually. For the swelling ratio, it is important to consider that a partial unfolding might occur at higher temperatures, even if most BSA molecules should be held in place by the four-armed linker.

Whenever a macroporous hydrogel is intended for use in cell culture, the adhesion properties of the material play a crucial role in the individual application. Some materials bear inherent adhesion properties (e.g., heparin, short, extracellular matrix-derived peptide structures, or fibronectin)5. For those that do not have these features, the possibility to efficiently modify the material is desirable in order to introduce cell adhesion properties. One major advantage of protein hydrogels is the presence of a variety of accessible functional groups on the surface, which can be targeted by specific reactive linker molecules. Another option is the incorporation of cell adhesive peptides during polymerization, which can further facilitate the handling of the material and the production process, as only a single step is necessary to produce cell-adhesive materials. By using a four-armed, amine-reactive crosslinking agent26, the cell adhesion mediating peptide (in this case, RGD) can be directly co-polymerized during hydrogel formation. This procedure results in the proper adhesion of the cells, as shown in Figure 5. Two model cell lines, human breast cancer cells (A549, CCL-185) and adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells (MCF 7, HTB-22) were used to investigate the general feasibility of using this modified hydrogel in 3D cell culture. Both cell lines showed very good adhesion potentials on the modified hydrogels.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Freeze-drying the hydrogels. After hydrogel polymerization, the gels were transferred to -196 °C (liquid nitrogen) or -20 °C. The material was stained with fluorescent rhodamine B and analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. The size and distribution of the pores within the material were analyzed with imaging software and were plotted for the different temperatures. On the right side, representative pictures of the materials frozen at (A) -196 °C and (B) -20 °C are shown. The error bars represent the standard deviation. Scale bars = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Hydrogel particle leaching. Salt crystals are ground with a mortar and pestle for (A) 10 min, (B) 2 min, (C) 1 min, and (D) 0 min. Both hydrogel components are mixed, and the solution is saturated with salt crystals. After the polymerization of the materials, salt is eluted from the material by diluting the template in large amounts of deionized water. The material is stained with fluorescent rhodamine B and analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. The size and distribution of the pores within the material were analyzed with imaging software and plotted for the different grinding times. Images A to D show the pores within representative hydrogels, where salt crystals of varying sizes were used. The error bars represent the standard deviation. Scale bars = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Channel formation. The polymerized hydrogels were transferred to a block of dry ice for 30 s. This was followed by the sublimation of the ice crystals from the structure at 0.05 mbar and -85 °C. The material was stained with fluorescent rhodamine B and analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. The channels were several hundred microns long and had diameters of about 20 µm. Scale bars = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Enzymatic degradation. Representative degradation pattern of a macroporous hydrogel treated using a salt-leaching approach with ground salt crystals (10 min). Degradation took place in solution with 300 U trypsin and pepsin and was compared to an untreated hydrogel in PBS by measuring the residual weight of the material every hour. The error bars represent the standard deviation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Cellular behavior on hydrogels. To investigate the potential of the material in cell culture, hydrogels were functionalized with a cell-adhesive RGD peptide. The hydrogels were polymerized into a µ-slide 8 well and seeded with 2 x 105/cm2 A549 and MCF7 cells. The cells were allowed to grow and adhere to the material for 24 h. After fixation with 3.7% formaldehyde and permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100, the cells were stained with cell-specific phalloidin-rhodamine and were visualized with inverted confocal laser scanning microscopy at a wavelength of 514 nm. Scale bars = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Salt leaching Salt leaching (grinded salt, 10 min) Frozen at  Frozen at  Gradient freezing Non-porous hydrogels
-20°C -196°C
pH 2 [%] 95.3 ± 3.8 96.2 ± 3.3 94.4 ± 3.4 96.2 ± 5.2 89.7 ± 4.3 69.5 ± 4.4
pH 7 [%] 95.6 ± 2.3 94.4 ± 4.2 95.3 ± 5.6 94.2 ± 3.2 94.1 ± 3.2 98.2 ± 1.6
pH 10 [%] 82.1 ± 4.4 86.1 ± 3.2 76.3 ± 5.5 83.2 ± 4.3 84.2 ± 4.5 42.3 ± 4.1
RT [%] 97.4 ± 4.4 95.4 ± 0.42 91.3 ± 2.2 94.3 ± 4.1 97.1 ± 1.9 99.1 ± 2.2
37°C [%] 95.3 ± 4.2 97.4 ± 0.4 93.2 ± 3.3 96.2 ± 1.9 95.3 ± 4.3 98.3 ± 3.4
80°C [%] 81.2 ± 4.4 83.6 ± 4.5 84.2 ± 4.9 83.5 ± 3.4 91.4 ± 8.1 70.2 ± 6.2
Swelling ratio [%] 1153 ± 110 534 ± 45 1312  ± 91 834 ± 78  823 ± 163
Trypsin [h] 4.5 ± 0.23 7.4 ± 0.29 3.2 ± 0.21 6.5 ± 0.13 4.2 ± 0.13 55.0 ± 2.48
Pepsin [h] 3.1 ± 0.19 4.0 ± 0.22 2.4 ± 0.13 3.8 ± 0.14 3.5 ± 0.19 46.5 ± 3.02

Table 1: Hydrogel properties. To investigate the influence of the pore formation methods used here (top line), different types of hydrogels were investigated for their pH and temperature stabilities, swelling ratio, and enzymatic degradation pattern (left column). For pH values of 2, 7, and 10 and temperatures of RT, 37 °C, and 80 °C, the average residual weights of the hydrogels after 7 days are displayed as percentages. For enzymatic degradation, the half-lives (h) of the materials in 300 U trypsin and pepsin are shown. For the swelling ratios, the water uptakes based upon the dried gels are shown are percentages.

List of Materials

Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) Thermo Fisher Scientific 10010023
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (high glucose) Life Technologies / Thermo Fisher  11140-050
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) Life Technologies / Thermo Fisher  10270-106
Penicillin-Streptomycin Life Technologies / Thermo Fisher  15140122
MEM Nonessential Amino Acid Solution Sigma Aldrich M7145-100ML
Trypsin EDTA 0.05 % Phenol Red Thermo Fisher Scientific 25300062
Ethanol 99.8 %, vergällt Ölfabrik Schmidt 2133
NaCl  Carl Roth  9265.1
Albumin Fraction V Carl Roth  3854.2
THPC Sigma Aldrich 404861-100ML Toxic
0.1 % Triton X 100 Sigma Aldrich X100-100ML Slightly toxic
Phalloidin-rhodamine  Life Technologies / Thermo Fisher  R415
3.7 % Formaldehyde  Life Technologies / Thermo Fisher  F8775-25ML Toxic
Rhodamine B Sigma Aldrich 81-88-9
Filtropur S 0.2,  Sarsted Ag und Co. 2 83.1826.001   
µ slide 8 well Ibidi GmbH 80826
KCSSGKSRGDS peptide UPEP Ulm Custom sysnthesis
Ethanol 99.8 %, vergällt Carl Roth  K928.5
Falcon 5 ml Polysterene Round-Bottom Tube  Sarsted Ag und Co. 62.547.254    
Tubes 50 ml  Sarsted Ag und Co. 62.547.254    
Tubes 1,5 ml   Sarsted Ag und Co. 72,690,001
Tubes 2 ml   Sarsted Ag und Co. 72,691
CELL CULTURE MICROPLATE, 96 WELL, PS, F-BOTTOM Greiner 655073
FreezeDryer Epsilon 1-6D,  Christ, Osterode am Harz, Germany
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope  Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany
Zen Software Version 2012 Sp1, black edition, 407 version 8,1,0,484 Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany
GSA Imaga Analyzer Software, GSA Image Analyzer, GSA, Version 419 3.8.7 GSA GmbH

Lab Prep

Hydrogels are recognized as promising materials for cell culture applications due to their ability to provide highly hydrated cell environments. The field of 3D templates is rising due to the potential resemblance of those materials to the natural extracellular matrix. Protein-based hydrogels are particularly promising because they can easily be functionalized and can achieve defined structures with adjustable physicochemical properties. However, the production of macroporous 3D templates for cell culture applications using natural materials is often limited by their weaker mechanical properties compared to those of synthetic materials. Here, different methods were evaluated to produce macroporous bovine serum albumin (BSA)-based hydrogel systems, with adjustable pore sizes in the range of 10 to 70 µm in radius. Furthermore, a method to generate channels in this protein-based material that are several hundred microns long was established. The different methods to produce pores, as well as the influence of pore size on material properties such as swelling ratio, pH, temperature stability, and enzymatic degradation behavior, were analyzed. Pore sizes were investigated in the native, swollen state of the hydrogels using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The feasibility for cell culture applications was evaluated using a cell-adhesive RGD peptide modification of the protein system and two model cell lines: human breast cancer cells (A549) and adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells (MCF7).

Hydrogels are recognized as promising materials for cell culture applications due to their ability to provide highly hydrated cell environments. The field of 3D templates is rising due to the potential resemblance of those materials to the natural extracellular matrix. Protein-based hydrogels are particularly promising because they can easily be functionalized and can achieve defined structures with adjustable physicochemical properties. However, the production of macroporous 3D templates for cell culture applications using natural materials is often limited by their weaker mechanical properties compared to those of synthetic materials. Here, different methods were evaluated to produce macroporous bovine serum albumin (BSA)-based hydrogel systems, with adjustable pore sizes in the range of 10 to 70 µm in radius. Furthermore, a method to generate channels in this protein-based material that are several hundred microns long was established. The different methods to produce pores, as well as the influence of pore size on material properties such as swelling ratio, pH, temperature stability, and enzymatic degradation behavior, were analyzed. Pore sizes were investigated in the native, swollen state of the hydrogels using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The feasibility for cell culture applications was evaluated using a cell-adhesive RGD peptide modification of the protein system and two model cell lines: human breast cancer cells (A549) and adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells (MCF7).

Procedure

Hydrogels are recognized as promising materials for cell culture applications due to their ability to provide highly hydrated cell environments. The field of 3D templates is rising due to the potential resemblance of those materials to the natural extracellular matrix. Protein-based hydrogels are particularly promising because they can easily be functionalized and can achieve defined structures with adjustable physicochemical properties. However, the production of macroporous 3D templates for cell culture applications using natural materials is often limited by their weaker mechanical properties compared to those of synthetic materials. Here, different methods were evaluated to produce macroporous bovine serum albumin (BSA)-based hydrogel systems, with adjustable pore sizes in the range of 10 to 70 µm in radius. Furthermore, a method to generate channels in this protein-based material that are several hundred microns long was established. The different methods to produce pores, as well as the influence of pore size on material properties such as swelling ratio, pH, temperature stability, and enzymatic degradation behavior, were analyzed. Pore sizes were investigated in the native, swollen state of the hydrogels using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The feasibility for cell culture applications was evaluated using a cell-adhesive RGD peptide modification of the protein system and two model cell lines: human breast cancer cells (A549) and adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells (MCF7).

Tags