The purity and integrity of the isolated RNA is a vital step in RNA dependent assays. Here, we present a practical, rapid, and inexpensive method to extract RNA from a small quantity of undamaged pancreatic tissue.
Regardless of the extraction method, optimized RNA extraction of tissues and cell lines are carried out in four stages: 1) homogenization, 2) effective denaturation of proteins from RNA, 3) ribonuclease inactivation, and 4) removal of contamination from DNA, proteins, and carbohydrates. However, it is very laborious to maintain the integrity of RNA when there are high levels of RNase in the tissue. Spontaneous autolysis makes it very difficult to extract RNA from pancreatic tissue without damaging it. Thus, a practical RNA extraction method is needed to maintain the integrity of pancreatic tissues during the extraction process. An experimental and comparative study of existing protocols was carried out by obtaining 20-30 mg of rat pancreatic tissues in less than 2 minutes and extracting the RNA. The results were assessed by electrophoresis. The experiments were carried out three times for generalization of the results. Immersing pancreatic tissue in RNA stabilization reagent at -80 °C for 24 h yielded high integrity RNA, when the RNA extraction reagent was used as the reagent. The results obtained were comparable to the results obtained from commercial kits with spin column bindings.
Structural gene data can be transcribed to a functional product through gene expression. RNA analysis is used to discover differences in gene expression across different conditions. There are a number of methods to extract nucleic acids as follows: guanidinium thiocyanate, extraction via phenol-chloroform, cellulose-based chromatography, extraction by silica matrices, and anion-exchange1,2.
Proper detection of gene expression is influenced by the integrity of RNA isolated from tissues; therefore, it is vital to evaluate the integrity of RNA isolated from tissues before further tests are carried out because complementary molecular tests on low-quality RNA may jeopardize diagnostic application results. Thus, high integrity RNA is needed for molecular biological tests with different diagnostic applications: quantitative RT-PCR, micro-arrays, ribonuclease protection assay, northern blot analysis, RNA mapping, and cDNA library construction3,4.
RNA becomes rather unstable after being kept for a long time. Long mRNA fragments over 10 kb are particularly susceptible to degradation5,6. Thus, researchers must consider various factors that influence the integrity of purified RNA. The purity of RNA must be protected against RNases, proteins, genomic DNA, and enzymatic inhibitor contamination. In addition, the best and acceptable absorption ratio of RNA to UV (260/280) must be within the range of 1.8-2.0 with minimum fragmentation over electrophoresis. Recently developed laboratory techniques have enabled scientists to evaluate the integrity of molecular analysis sample more practically7,8.
It is much more difficult to extract undamaged RNA from pancreatic tissue than other types of tissues because of the high quantity of ribonucleases (RNases). However, existing extraction methods, namely the rapid ejection of the pancreatic tissue from the abdominal cavity and homogenization at low temperatures to impede RNases, have proven ineffective7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14.
The purpose of the present comparative experimental study is to modify and compare existing methods to determine the most efficient methods. To that end, various protocols of RNA extraction were modified and compared. It was specifically aimed at determining the least expensive method requiring a minimum amount of pancreatic tissue.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Approval number: 93-01-01-71783-07-2014).
NOTE: Use male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 250 g. Place the vial containing a sliver of pancreatic tissue immersed in RNA stabilizing reagent in a liquid nitrogen tank at -80 °C and use RNA extraction reagent solution to maintain the integrity of RNA.
1. Removal of the rat pancreatic tissue
2. RNA extraction
3. Evaluating RNA Integrity with denaturation electrophoresis
Evaluation of the integrity of RNA in the RNA extraction reagent according to a routine and modified surgical protocol without RNA stabilization reagent
Unacceptable bands were observed after the extraction of RNA with the RNA extraction reagent from a routine surgical protocol. Lane 1 shows RNA from the liver as a control. Lane 2 shows the degraded status of 28S/18S rRNA bands in total RNA obtained from a routine surgical protocol. When the quantity of pancreatic tissue was reduced to 50 mg (lane 3) or 20-30 mg (lane 4) and the surgery was performed immediately (modified protocol) without the RNA stabilization reagent, RNA separation was less successful than in the liver tissue control and unspecific bands were observed.
Evaluation of the integrity of RNA samples according to a modified surgical protocol immersed in RNA stabilization reagent
The integrity of RNAs produced with the RNA extraction reagent depends on the preservation time and temperature (lane 5-8). In comparison with the control liver tissue, RNA separation was not successful when the amount of pancreatic tissue was 50 mg (lane 5) or 20-30 mg (lane 6). RNA was extracted immediately after the tissue was immersed in RNA stabilization reagent. No specific band was observed when 20-30 mg of tissue was submerged in RNA stabilization reagent at -80 °C for 48 h and RNA was extracted based on the protocol. According to the electrophoresis results, the RNA was completely degraded (lane 7). As depicted in lane 8, acceptable bands (28S/18S rRNA) were observed after submerging 20-30 mg of pancreatic tissue in RNA stabilization reagent at -80 °C for 24 h, and then RNA was extracted.
Figure 1: Assessment of the integrity of RNA isolated from rat pancreatic tissues using RNA extraction reagent according to the protocols under the investigation. Lane 1 depicts the integrity of RNA obtained from the liver as a control. Lane 2 represents the status of 28S/18S rRNA bands in total RNA obtained from a routine surgical protocol. Lane 3 represents the status of 28S/18S rRNA bands in total RNA obtained from a modified surgical protocol and 50 mg of tissue. Lane 4 represents the status of 28S/18S rRNA bands in total RNA obtained from a modified surgical protocol and 20-30 mg of tissue. Lane 5 represents the status of 28S/18S rRNA bands in total RNA obtained from a modified surgical protocol and 50 mg of tissue extracted immediately after being immersed in RNA stabilization reagent. Lane 6 shows the integrity of RNA obtained from 20-30 mg of pancreatic tissue from a modified surgical protocol extracted immediately after being immersed in RNA stabilization reagent. Lane 7 depicts the integrity of RNA obtained from 20-30 mg of tissue from a modified surgical protocol after 48 h of immersion in an RNA stabilization reagent at -80 °C. Lane 8 depicts the integrity of RNA obtained from 20-30 mg of tissue from a modified surgical protocol after 24 h of immersion in an RNA stabilization reagent at -80 °C. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In molecular biology it is vital to obtain high-quality RNA. The presence of the ribonuclease enzymes in cells and tissues quickly degrades RNA and makes the extraction complex. RNases are stable enzymes functioning without any co-factors. Small amounts of RNase are adequate to destroy RNA. When the rat pancreatic tissue is removed from the abdominal cavity, it is necessary to disinfect the surgical instruments by strong detergents, rinse them thoroughly and put them in an oven for at least 4 h at 240 °C to inactivate RNases before surgery. Given the fact that the RNase level is extremely high in the pancreas, the place of surgery is sterilized with NaOH and mild bleach to deactivate the RNases. While pancreatic tissue is being removed during dissection, the RNA would degrade. To increase efficiency, it is necessary for the dissection to be completed as quickly as possible20,21,22,23,24.
The pancreas is a critical tissue for the body’s homeostatic mechanisms. Hence, improved pancreatic RNA extraction procedures help researchers better understand active pathways. The present protocol proposed a model for an efficient, simple, and optimized method for RNA extraction from the pancreas. Different common RNA extraction methods from pancreatic tissue were evaluated. It was concentrated on the effect of frozen storage and RNase inhibition strategies influencing RNA quality. The two most significant factors influencing the integrity of RNA are surgery duration and the amount of collected pancreatic tissue. Recent studies have revealed that there is a positive correlation between RNA degradation and the amount of pancreatic tissue8,13,20.
In this protocol, 20-30 mg of pancreatic tissue was obtained in less than 2 min from the anesthetized rats. Lengthy surgical steps may lead to activation of endogenous endonucleases in the pancreas and degrade the RNA quickly. In this study, RNA was isolated from different samples with guanidinium thiocyanate, and phenol-chloroform extraction techniques used liquid nitrogen to impede RNA activity. The method achieved three objectives: rapid permeation of RNA stabilization reagent in pancreatic tissues, protection of cellular RNA, and increased preservation time. The results were optimal when the samples containing RNA stabilization reagent were kept at -80 °C for 24 h.
However, RNA integrity increased significantly when RNA stabilization reagent was introduced. Moreover, this process was reproducible. A small section of the pancreas (20-30 mg) was dissected during surgery from anesthetized rats and submerged in 1 mL of RNA stabilization reagent at -80°C for 1-2 days. As seen in lane 8, storage for 24 h was the optimal time.
The aforementioned methods allowed a smaller quantity of RNA stabilization reagent to penetrate into the organ. Furthermore, the degradation process discontinued shortly after the experiments because the size of the pieces dissected was small. In this protocol, the vital step is cutting the immersed tissue in RNA stabilization reagent to very small pieces as soon as possible until it penetrates the cells and suppresses activation of RNase. In the homogenizing step, it is very crucial to prevent bubble production in the RNA extraction reagent and perform all steps at 4 °C. It is crucial to separate the aqua phase (the phase containing RNA) very carefully to avoid DNA contamination. Although autolysis and the presence of endogenous RNases compromise intact RNA isolation from the rat pancreas, the integrity of RNA was maintained in the proposed pancreas perfusion method. Thus, the proposed method is a straightforward, reproducible, and inexpensive procedure that requires smaller quantities of RNA stabilization reagent than the other existing methods.
Like any study, this protocol has some limitations. First, the integrity and yield of obtained RNA is less than using whole pancreatic tissue as only 20-30 mg of tissue is used. Second, a large number of samples cannot be taken in one day because RNA extraction and also cDNA synthesis tests must be done fast and consecutively to decrease RNA degradation. Third, to perform research projects with different rat groups, it is essential to take exactly 20-30 mg of tissue from the same surgical area to decrease variation of data because rat pancreatic tissue diffuses completely in the peritoneal cavity.
To conclude, using RNA extraction reagent solution after RNA stabilization reagent perfusion is a good alternative to expensive and column-based RNA extraction kits.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The present study was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 93-01-01-71783-07-2014). We thank Mr. Zomorodian and Mr. Rostami at the Department of e-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School and Center of Excellence in e-Learning, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for editing the video.
Agarose | Merck | 116801 | Germany |
Atoclave | Teb Zaim | Iran | |
Centrifuge | Sigma | Germany | |
Chloroform | Merck | 107024 | Germany |
Diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water | Sigma | Germany | |
EDTA | sigma | 60-00-4 | Germany |
Electrophoresis tank | Payapajoohesh | Iran | |
Eppendorf microTube | Extragene | Taiwan | |
EtBr | sigma | E 8751 | Germany |
Ethanol | Merck | 81870 | Germany |
Falcon Tube | Extragene | Taiwan | |
Formaldehyde | Merck | 344198 | Germany |
Formamide | Merck | 344206 | Germany |
Homogenizer-sunicator | Microson XL 2000 | ABD | |
Isopropanol | sigma | 19516 | Germany |
Ketamine hydrochloride | sigma | 1867-66-9 | Germany |
Laminar Flow Hood | Jal Tajhiz | Iran | |
Mgnetic stirrer | Labrotechnik | ABD | |
Microcentrifuge | Eppendorf | Germany | |
Micropipette Tips | Extragene | Taiwan | |
MOPS | sigma | 85022106 | Germany |
Na AC | Merck | 567422 | Germany |
NaOH | Merck | 109137 | Germany |
Oven | Teb Zaim | Iran | |
PH meter | Knick | Germany | |
RNA Later/RNA stabilization reagent | Qiagen | 76104 | ABD |
Surgical instrument | Agn Thos | German made | |
Syringes | AvaPezeshk | Iran | |
TriPure reagent/RNA extraction reagent | Roche | 11667157001 | ABD |
Vortex | Labinco | Netherland | |
Water bath | Memmert | Germany | |
zylazine | sigma | 7361-61-7 | Germany |