This procedure shows how to target interneurons in the developing mouse forebrain by means of in utero electroporation. This technique was particularly efficient to achieve selective gene expression in interneuron subtypes destined to the superficial layers of the cortex.
The study of central nervous system (CNS) maturation relies on genetic targeting of neuronal populations. However, the task of restricting the expression of genes of interest to specific neuronal subtypes has proven remarkably challenging due to the relative scarcity of specific promoter elements. GABAergic interneurons constitute a neuronal population with extensive genetic and morphological diversity. Indeed, more than 11 different subtypes of GABAergic interneurons have been characterized in the mouse cortex1. Here we present an adapted protocol for selective targeting of GABAergic populations. We achieved subtype selective targeting of GABAergic interneurons by using the enhancer element of the homeobox transcription factors Dlx5 and Dlx6, homologues of the Drosophila distal-less (Dll) gene2,3, to drive the expression of specific genes through in utero electroporation.
The bulk of cortical GABAergic interneurons originate from two transient embryonic structures named the medial and caudal ganglionic eminences (MGE and CGE respectively)4. Parvalbumin and somatostatin expressing interneurons originate in the MGE whereas Calretinin (Cr), Vasointestinal peptide (VIP) and Reelin (Re) expressing interneurons originate from the CGE. These interneuron subtypes can be distinguished by their birthdates. MGE derived subtypes are born between embryonic day 9.5 (e9.5) and e16.55,6. In contrast, CGE derived interneurons are born from e12.5 through e18.5 with their production peaking at e15.56. The genetic targeting of this late born population, however, remains elusive.
The murine distal-less (Dlx) genes are exclusively expressed in the developing ventral forebrain3. GABAergic interneurons and striatal projection neurons but not cortical pyramidal cells express Dlx1,2,5, and 6 genes at early developmental stages3. Indeed, the Dlx genes are expressed in the MGE and CGE subventricular zone (SVZ) in all GABAergic progenitors. Expression of these genes becomes restricted to select subtypes at postmitotic stages7-9. Previous experimental evidence showed that the Dlx5/6 enhancer element allows for the selective targeting of GABAergic lineages in transgenic mouse models2. We tested the use of one of these enhancer elements in the context of episomal expression in the developing mouse brain. We sub cloned the Dlx5/6 enhancer element together with a minimal promoter and the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) in a bluescript (BS) backbone plasmid (Figure 1). We introduced the plasmid by means of in utero electroporation at e15.5 to selectively target Cr-, VIP and Re- subtypes3,8,10. Our technique allows for sparse electroporation, which facilitates the reconstruction of morphological features of singe cells. In addition, the exceptionally high levels of gene expression in cortical GABAergic neurons allows for functional studies. We carried out loss and gain of function studies using several wild type and dominant negative genes11.
All animals were treated in accordance with the regulations and guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the NYU School of Medicine.
Mouse Strains
Swiss Webster female mice provided by TACONIC were used for these experiments. In order to specifically target superficial layer interneurons, e15.5 embryos were used.
Note: The plasmid used in this work (Dlx5/6.eGFP plasmid 3 µg/µl) was generated using standard cloning techniques. The eGFP cDNA was cloned into a Dlx5/6-Pmin-polyA plasmid. This plasmid is available upon request (demarn02@nyumc.org).
1. Preparation of Microinjection Pipettes
2. Anesthesia Procedure
3. Surgery
4. Electroporation
We adapted the in utero electroporation technique to achieve cell type specific targeting of maturing neurons. To drive the expression of eGFP in CGE-derived interneurons, we used the Dlx5/6 enhancer element and restricted our injections to e15.5, the stage when the majority of CGE-derived interneurons are generated. We carried out the analysis at P8 and P15 11(Figures 1 and 2). We confirmed the ventral origin of electroporated neurons by co electroporating a CAG-mCherry and a Dlx5/6-eGFP plasmids at equimolar concentrations at e15.5. In this experiment, we observed that only ventral progenitors located in the subventricular zone (SVZ) co expressed both proteins11. This spatio temporal expression of fluorescent proteins coincides with the normal developmental expression of the Dlx5 and 6 genes, which are not expressed in the ventricular but subventricular zone4. Furthermore, we assessed the GABAergic identity of Dlx5/6-mCherry electroporated interneurons in a GAD67-eGFP knockin mouse line. We found that the vast majority of electroporated neurons expressed GAD67, an enzyme expressed by all GABAergic cells11. In addition, we determined the subtype identity of electroporated interneurons by performing immunohistochemistry and electrophysiological analysis at P15. The pattern of expression of subtype specific markers was revealed by immunofluorescence in cryostat sections11 (Figure 2). We found that interneurons electroporated at e15.5 almost exclusively express NPY, Reelin, VIP and Cr, previously described CGE-derived interneuron markers6. Furthermore, the intrinsic electrophysiological properties of these neurons are in agreement with the one previously described in fate mapping studies6,11. All together, these results indicate that electroporation with the Dlx5/6 enhancer element at e15.5 selectively target CGE-derived interneuron subtypes.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the electroporation experiments. a) Subcloning strategy for the Dlx5/6-eGFP plasmid. b) Diagram illustrating the experimental strategy.
Figure 2. Electroporated interneurons are delineated by the expression of CGE-derived subtype markers. A) CGE-derived interneurons electroporated with a Dlx5/6-eGFP plasmid. Note the sparse electroporation of diverse CGE subtypes. B) A VIP-expressing interneuron at P8. eGFP expression delineates the entire dentritic tree and axonal arbor of single neurons. C) An NPY-expressing interneuron at P8. NPY expression delineates neurogliaform cells. D) An NPY-expressing interneuron at P15. Scale bar A, 100 mm; B-D, 50 mm
Limitations of the Technique
While this technique allows for cell autonomous analysis of cell processes, it is not suitable for population analysis. The electroporations are very sparse with less than a thousand cells electroporated per brain. As a consequence, the technique cannot be used to assess behavioral consequences arising from the genetic manipulation of CGE-derived interneurons.
While electroporations carried out at e13.5-e14.5 target MGE-derived subtypes, the efficiency is low10. We speculate that the Dlx5/6 enhancer is less active in postmitotic MGE subtypes at least in the context of episomal expression.
Significance with Respect to Existing Methods
The technique represents advancement from previously electroporation methods12,13 for the study of interneurons. Due to their relative scarcity and ventral embryonic origin, this population of neurons has proven difficult to target. Our technique provides the means to carry out cell-autonomous analysis of CGE-derived interneurons. The high levels of eGFP expression allow for the visualization and analysis of single interneurons.
Future Applications
By combining the use of specific plasmids and genetically modified mouse lines it is possible to achieve temporal and spatial control in the expression of genes of interest. For example, we used a Dlx5/6-Tta plasmid to turn on the expression of tetO inducible transgenes. In these experiments, we were able to silence the transgene expression by administrating Doxycycline8. We are currently developing a protocol to use the technique in combination with the CreER system.
Critical Steps within the Protocol
To achieve efficient electroporation and survival, try to avoid excessive manipulation of the embryos and/or organs. In addition, avoid pinching arteries and veins. The mouse will quickly become hypovolemic if bleeding occurs. After the electroporation is completed, place the embryos and organs in the same positions where you found them to avoid creating kinks that could cause hypoxia. Aim for 20 min or less surgery time. Moisturize the abdominal cavity with PBS numerous times during the surgery. During the electroporation, try to puncture the ventricle only once with the capillary needle. Repetitive puncturing will decrease the survival rate. After the training period, the survival rate should be 80% or higher.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We are grateful to Lihong Yin for technical assistance. NVD is a recipient of a NARSAD Young Investigator Award and is also supported by grants from NIH (5 K99 MH095825-02). Research in the Fishell lab is supported by the National Institute of Health, National Institute of Mental Health (5 R01 MH095147-02, 5 R01 MH071679-09), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5 R01 NS081297-02, 1 P01 NS074972-01A1) and the Simons Foundation.
Electroporator with pedal | Protech International | CUY21 | |
5mm paddle electrodes | Protech International | CUY650P5 | |
Heating pad | Kent Scientific | DCT-15 | |
Sutter Instruments P30 Puller | Sutter Instruments | 3282322 | |
Fluovac Anesthesia Systems | Harvard Apparatus | 726425 | |
Delicate Operating Scissors 4.75" Straight Sharp/Sharp | Roboz | RS-6702 | |
5-0 Silk Black Braid 18" C-1 Box 36 | Roboz | SUT-1073-21 | |
Micro Clip Applying Forceps 5.5" | Roboz | RS-5410 | |
2 Clamp scissors | Roboz | RC-4894 | |
Holding forceps | Fine Science Tools | 11031-15 | |
Glass capillary tubing | FHC | 27-30-0 | Borosil 1.0mm OD x 0.75mm ID |
Fast Green | Sigma-Aldrich | F7258 | |
Sterile PBS | Life Technologies | 20012-027 |