Özet

Мультимодальные изображений имплантации стволовых клеток в центральной нервной системе мышей

Published: June 13, 2012
doi:

Özet

В этой статье описываются оптимизированные последовательности событий для мультимодальных изображений клеточных трансплантатов у грызунов мозга с помощью: (I) в естественных условиях биолюминесценции и магнитно-резонансной томографии, и (II) после смерти гистологический анализ. Сочетание этих условий изображение на одного животного позволяет сотовой трансплантата оценки с высоким разрешением, чувствительностью и специфичностью.

Abstract

During the past decade, stem cell transplantation has gained increasing interest as primary or secondary therapeutic modality for a variety of diseases, both in preclinical and clinical studies. However, to date results regarding functional outcome and/or tissue regeneration following stem cell transplantation are quite diverse. Generally, a clinical benefit is observed without profound understanding of the underlying mechanism(s)1. Therefore, multiple efforts have led to the development of different molecular imaging modalities to monitor stem cell grafting with the ultimate aim to accurately evaluate survival, fate and physiology of grafted stem cells and/or their micro-environment. Changes observed in one or more parameters determined by molecular imaging might be related to the observed clinical effect. In this context, our studies focus on the combined use of bioluminescence imaging (BLI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological analysis to evaluate stem cell grafting.

BLI is commonly used to non-invasively perform cell tracking and monitor cell survival in time following transplantation2-7, based on a biochemical reaction where cells expressing the Luciferase-reporter gene are able to emit light following interaction with its substrate (e.g. D-luciferin)8, 9. MRI on the other hand is a non-invasive technique which is clinically applicable10 and can be used to precisely locate cellular grafts with very high resolution11-15, although its sensitivity highly depends on the contrast generated after cell labeling with an MRI contrast agent. Finally, post-mortem histological analysis is the method of choice to validate research results obtained with non-invasive techniques with highest resolution and sensitivity. Moreover end-point histological analysis allows us to perform detailed phenotypic analysis of grafted cells and/or the surrounding tissue, based on the use of fluorescent reporter proteins and/or direct cell labeling with specific antibodies.

In summary, we here visually demonstrate the complementarities of BLI, MRI and histology to unravel different stem cell- and/or environment-associated characteristics following stem cell grafting in the CNS of mice. As an example, bone marrow-derived stromal cells, genetically engineered to express the enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (eGFP) and firefly Luciferase (fLuc), and labeled with blue fluorescent micron-sized iron oxide particles (MPIOs), will be grafted in the CNS of immune-competent mice and outcome will be monitored by BLI, MRI and histology (Figure 1).

Protocol

1. Сотовые подготовка Эксперимент следует начать использование бывших естественных культурных стволовых клеточных популяций генетически модифицированных выразить люциферазы и белков EGFP репортера. Здесь мы используем люциферазы / EGFP экспрессией мышиных костномозгового происх…

Discussion

В этом докладе мы описываем оптимизированный протокол для комбинации из трех дополнительных методов визуализации (BLI, МРТ и гистология) подробные характеристики клеточных имплантантов в ЦНС иммунокомпетентных мышей. Сочетание гена-репортера маркировки клеток, основанный на генетиче…

Açıklamalar

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

<p class="jove_content"> Авторы Работа выполнена при поддержке исследовательского гранта ID-конвертерного 2006 году в Университете Антверпена (предоставляется РРО и AVDL), на исследовательский грант G.0136.11 и G.0130.11 (предоставляется AVDL, ZB и ППО) и 1.5.021.09. N.00 (предоставляется РРО) Фонда научных исследований, Фландрии (FWO-Vlaanderen, Бельгия), по SBO грант ИВТ-60838: BRAINSTIM из Фламандского института по науке и технике (предоставляется ZB и AVDL), в частично Methusalem исследовательский грант от правительства Фландрии (предоставляется ZB), в частности, ИС-FP6-NoE Дими (LSHB-CT-2005-512146), EC-FP6-NoE EMIL (LSHC-CT-2004-503569) , а Интер университета Привлечение поляков IUAP-NIMI-P6/38 (предоставляется AVDL). Натали Де Vocht степень доктора наук, стипендия от FWO-Vlaanderen. Петр Ponsaerts это после защиты докторской диссертации в FWO-Vlaanderen.</p>

Materials

Name of the reagent Company Catalogue number Yorumlar
IMDM Lonza BE12-722F Component of the cell growth medium CEM
Fetal bovine serum Gibco 10270-106 Component of the cell growth medium CEM
Horse serum Gibco 1605-122 Component of the cell growth medium CEM
Penicillin-streptomycin Gibco 15140 Component of the cell growth medium CEM
Fungizone Gibco 15290-018 Component of the cell growth medium CEM
PBS Gibco 14190  
Puromycine Invivogen ant-pr-1  
trypsin Gibco 25300  
GB MPIO Bangs Laboratories ME04F/7833  
D-luciferin Promega E1601  
Ketamine (Ketalar) Pfizer    
Xylazine (Rompun) Bayer Health care    
Isoflurane Isoflo 05260-05  
0.9% NaCl solution Baxter    
paraformaldehyde Merck 1.04005.1000  
sucrose Applichem A1125  
Micro-injection pump KD scientific KDS100  
Photon imager Biospace Lab    
9.4T MR scanner Bruker Biospin Biospec 94/20 USR  
BX51 microscope Olympus BX51  
Mycrom HM cryostat Prosan HM525  
syringe Hamilton 7635-01  
30 gauge needle Hamilton 7762-03  
Photo Vision software Biospace Lab    
M3vision software Biospace Lab    
Paravision 5.1 software Bruker Biospin    
Amira 4.0 software Visage Imaging    

Referanslar

  1. Rodriguez-Porcel, M., Wu, J. C., Gambhir, S. S. . Molecular imaging of stem cells. , (2008).
  2. Bergwerf, I., De Vocht, N., Tambuyzer, B. Reporter gene-expressing bone marrow-derived stromal cells are immune-tolerated following implantation in the central nervous system of syngeneic immunocompetent mice. BMC Biotechnol. 9, 1 (2009).
  3. Bergwerf, I., Tambuyzer, B., De Vocht, N. Recognition of cellular implants by the brain’s innate immune system. Immunol. Cell Biol. 89, 511-516 (2011).
  4. Bradbury, M. S., Panagiotakos, G., Chan, B. K. Optical bioluminescence imaging of human ES cell progeny in the rodent CNS. J. Neurochem. 102, 2029-2039 (2007).
  5. De Vocht, N., Bergwerf, I., Vanhoutte, G. Labeling of Luciferase/eGFP-Expressing Bone Marrow-Derived Stromal Cells with Fluorescent Micron-Sized Iron Oxide Particles Improves Quantitative and Qualitative Multimodal Imaging of Cellular Grafts In Vivo. Mol Imaging Biol. , (2011).
  6. Reekmans, K., Praet, J., Daans, J. Current Challenges for the Advancement of Neural Stem Cell Biology and Transplantation Research. Stem Cell Rev. , (2011).
  7. Reekmans, K. P., Praet, J., De Vocht, N. Clinical potential of intravenous neural stem cell delivery for treatment of neuroinflammatory disease in mice. Cell Transplant. 20, 851-869 (2011).
  8. Contag, C. H., Bachmann, M. H. Advances in in vivo bioluminescence imaging of gene expression. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4, 235-260 (2002).
  9. Sadikot, R. T., Blackwell, T. S. Bioluminescence imaging. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2, 511-540 (2005).
  10. Sykova, E., Jendelova, P., Herynek, V. MR tracking of stem cells in living recipients. Methods Mol. Biol. 549, 197-215 (2009).
  11. Daadi, M. M., Li, Z., Arac, A. Molecular and magnetic resonance imaging of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cell grafts in ischemic rat. 17, 1282-1291 (2009).
  12. Heyn, C., Ronald, J. A., Ramadan, S. S. In vivo MRI of cancer cell fate at the single-cell level in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 56, 1001-1010 (2006).
  13. Hoehn, M., Kustermann, E., Blunk, J. Monitoring of implanted stem cell migration in vivo: a highly resolved in vivo magnetic resonance imaging investigation of experimental stroke in rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 16267-16272 (2002).
  14. Jendelova, P., Herynek, V., DeCroos, J. Imaging the fate of implanted bone marrow stromal cells labeled with superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Magn. Reson. Med. 50, 767-776 (2003).
  15. Modo, M., Mellodew, K., Cash, D. Mapping transplanted stem cell migration after a stroke: a serial, in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage. 21, 311-317 (2004).
  16. Boutry, S., Brunin, S., Mahieu, I. Magnetic labeling of non-phagocytic adherent cells with iron oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive study. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 3, 223-232 (2008).
  17. Mailander, V., Lorenz, M. R., Holzapfel, V. Carboxylated superparamagnetic iron oxide particles label cells intracellularly without transfection agents. Mol Imaging Biol. 10, 138-146 (2008).
  18. Modo, M., Hoehn, M., Bulte, J. W. Cellular MR imaging. Mol. Imaging. 4, 143-164 (2005).
  19. Hinds, K. A., Hill, J. M., Shapiro, E. M. Highly efficient endosomal labeling of progenitor and stem cells with large magnetic particles allows magnetic resonance imaging of single cells. Blood. 102, 867-872 (2003).
  20. Shapiro, E. M., Sharer, K., Skrtic, S. In vivo detection of single cells by MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 55, 242-249 (2006).
  21. Shapiro, E. M., Skrtic, S., Sharer, K. MRI detection of single particles for cellular imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 10901-10906 (2004).
  22. Crabbe, A., Vandeputte, C., Dresselaers, T. Effects of MRI contrast agents on the stem cell phenotype. Cell Transplant. 19, 919-936 (2010).
  23. Szarecka, A., Xu, Y., Tang, P. Dynamics of firefly luciferase inhibition by general anesthetics: Gaussian and anisotropic network analyses. Biophys. J. 93, 1895-1905 (2007).
  24. Keyaerts, M., Heneweer, C., Gainkam, L. O. Plasma protein binding of luciferase substrates influences sensitivity and accuracy of bioluminescence imaging. Mol. Imaging. Biol. 13, 59-66 (2011).
  25. Keyaerts, M., Verschueren, J., Bos, T. J. Dynamic bioluminescence imaging for quantitative tumour burden assessment using IV or IP administration of D: -luciferin: effect on intensity, time kinetics and repeatability of photon emission. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 35, 999-1007 (2008).
  26. Zhang, Y., Bressler, J. P., Neal, J. ABCG2/BCRP expression modulates D-Luciferin based bioluminescence imaging. Cancer Res. 67, 9389-9397 (2007).
  27. Brightwell, G., Poirier, V., Cole, E. Serum-dependent and cell cycle-dependent expression from a cytomegalovirus-based mammalian expression vector. Gene. 194, 115-123 (1997).
  28. Grassi, G., Maccaroni, P., Meyer, R. Inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation activate cytomegalovirus promoter-controlled reporter gene expression in human glioblastoma cell line U87. Carcinogenesis. 24, 1625-1635 (2003).
  29. Krishnan, M., Park, J. M., Cao, F. Effects of epigenetic modulation on reporter gene expression: implications for stem cell imaging. FASEB J. 20, 106-108 (2006).
  30. Svensson, R. U., Barnes, J. M., Rokhlin, O. W. Chemotherapeutic agents up-regulate the cytomegalovirus promoter: implications for bioluminescence imaging of tumor response to therapy. Cancer Res. 67, 10445-10454 (2007).

Play Video

Bu Makaleden Alıntı Yapın
De Vocht, N., Reekmans, K., Bergwerf, I., Praet, J., Hoornaert, C., Le Blon, D., Daans, J., Berneman, Z., Van der Linden, A., Ponsaerts, P. Multimodal Imaging of Stem Cell Implantation in the Central Nervous System of Mice. J. Vis. Exp. (64), e3906, doi:10.3791/3906 (2012).

View Video