Chemical genetics involves the substitution of a gatekeeper residue with an amino acid containing a different side chain at the target locus. Here, we have generated a mutant parasite containing a hypomorphic allele of cdpk1 and identified compensatory pathways adopted by the parasite in the mutant background.
One of the mechanisms for subverting the effect of drugs by the malaria parasite is through rewiring of its transcriptome. The effect is more pronounced for target genes belonging to the multigene family. Plasmodium falciparum protein kinases belonging to the CDPK family are essential for blood stage development. As such, CDPKs are considered good targets for the development of anti-malarial compounds. The chemical genetics approach has been historically used to elucidate the function of protein kinases in higher eukaryotes. It requires the substitution of gatekeeper residue for another amino acid with a different side chain through genetic manipulation. Amino acid substitution at the gatekeeper position modulates the activity of a protein kinase and changes its susceptibility to a specific class of compounds known as bumped kinase inhibitors (BKIs) that help in the functional identification of the target gene. Here, we have exploited the chemical genetics approach to understand compensatory mechanisms evolved by a mutant parasite harboring a hypomorphic allele of cdpk1. Overall, our approach helps in identifying compensatory pathways that may be simultaneously targeted to prevent the development of drug resistance against individual kinases.
Malaria is one of the leading infectious diseases that is responsible for millions of deaths every year, especially in children below 5 years of age1. There is no clinically available vaccine against malaria. Moreover, Plasmodium falciparum, the deadliest human malaria parasite, is known to have acquired resistance against the frontline drug called artemisinin2,3,4,5. There is an urgent necessity to identify new drug targets and novel strategies that can be quickly deployed to avoid the spread of artemisinin resistance worldwide. A better understanding of the mechanism of drug action and the molecular basis of compensatory pathways can help in devising better strategies to avoid the development of drug resistance.
Protein kinases belonging to the family of Calcium Dependent Protein Kinases (CDPKs) are crucial at many stages of parasite development during erythrocytic, sexual, and pre-erythrocytic stages6. During asexual replication of P. falciparum, CDPK5 is known to play a critical role in the exit of merozoites from mature schizonts7. Conditional deletion of CDPK5 does not allow schizonts to release merozoites into the bloodstream, leading to the death of the parasite. The molecular mechanism of CDPK5-mediated parasite egress is not completely understood and is thought to involve protein kinase G (PKG) as an upstream regulator7,8. CDPK7 is essential for the maturation of ring-stage parasites to trophozoite9. CDPK4 is another member of the CDPK family that is critical for sexual stage development within mosquitoes. It is involved in multiple steps during the exflagellation process and is therefore critical for the formation of free, motile, male gametes10,11,12,13. CDPK1 phosphorylate components of inner membrane complex and rhoptry14,15. Moreover, conditional deletion of CDPK1 results in hypo-phosphorylation of proteins involved in invasion of RBC16. CDPK1 has been shown to regulate the discharge of apical organelles during the invasion process17. CDPK1 also helps in the egress of merozoites from infected RBC by phosphorylating SERA5 protease18. Phosphorylated CDPK1 is preferentially localized at the apical end of merozoite, where it may interact with other parasite proteins required for the invasion process19,20. CDPK1 is also involved in the formation of male and female gametes, which is a critical step for malaria transmission and the sexual development of the parasite within mosquitoes21.
The chemical genetics approach has been historically used for the identification of functional roles of mammalian kinases22,23. The approach utilizes the substitution of a residue at the gatekeeper position with an amino acid of a different side chain. The change of gatekeeper residue modulates the size of an adjacent ATP pocket that, in turn, changes the accessibility of chemical compounds called bumped kinase inhibitors (BKIs) towards the mutant enzyme compared to the wild type. Substitution of a bulky residue at the gatekeeper position with a smaller residue allows access to BKIs, while reverse substitution makes the kinase resistant to BKIs. In some cases, the substitution of gatekeeper residue is associated with a decrease in the kinase activity of the target enzyme, making the modification intolerant for functional studies24,25. The negative effect of gatekeeper substitution on the enzyme activity can be reversed by generating suppressor mutation at a second site in the intolerant kinase25. A chemical genetics approach has been utilized to study the function of Apicomplexan protein kinases. The wild-type CDPK4 containing a smaller gatekeeper residue was selectively inhibited by bumped kinase inhibitors BKI-1 and 1294, leading to a block in male gametogenesis and oocyst development11,12. Substitution of a small gatekeeper residue in CDPK4 with a bulky methionine residue led to a decrease in BKI-mediated inhibition in exflagellation11. CDPK1 of Toxoplasma gondii, an Apicomplexan parasite closely related to the malaria parasite, was shown to be involved in motility and invasion of host cells by tachyzoites26,27. A smaller gatekeeper pocket of the wild-type TgCDPK1 was exploited to design specific inhibitors that decreased the disease pathogenesis in animal models28,29. Involvement of P. falciparum Protein Kinase G (PKG) in late schizogonic development and gamete formation was demonstrated by inhibiting the activity of the enzyme using specific pharmacological inhibitors30,31. Substitution of threonine at the gatekeeper position with glutamine (T618Q) greatly decreased the sensitivity of the mutant enzyme to the inhibitors, resulting in normal gametogenesis and schizont-to-ring progression30,31.
Most of the previous studies have utilized a chemical genetics approach for the functional characterization of target kinases11,12,22,23,26,30,31 however, we have adopted this approach to understand the development of compensatory mechanisms in parasites that harbor hypomorphic allele of a protein kinase. We earlier showed that substitution of wild-type gatekeeper residue in CDPK1 with methionine (T145M) results in ~ 47% decrease in the transphosphorylation potential of the mutant enzyme32. A mutant parasite containing the hypomorphic allele of cdpk1 (cdpk1t145m) is pre-adapted for the reduced activity of CDPK1 by transcriptional rewiring of other CDPK family members. We believe that this strategy may be used in general to elucidate the compensatory mechanisms in mutant parasites containing hypomorphic alleles of essential protein kinases. Other kinases that partially compensate for the function of the target kinase may be simultaneously inhibited along with the target kinase to prevent the development of drug resistance against individual kinases. This may serve as a better strategy for malaria control.
The P. falciparum parasite strain (NF54) was obtained from Alvaro Molina Cruz21,32,33. O+ human red blood cells used for the parasite culture were obtained from Rotary Blood Centre, New Delhi, India. The plasmids, pL6eGFP and pUF1, were obtained from Jose-Juan Lopez-Rubio. DSM267 was obtained from Margaret A. Phillips and Pradipsinh K. Rathod. WR99210 was provided by Jacobus Pharmaceutical Company.
1. Construction of plasmid for expression of recombinant CDPK1 in Escherichia coli
2. Expression and purification of recombinant CDPK1 protein in E. coli
3. Site-directed mutagenesis for generation of recombinant CDPK1 gatekeeper mutant proteins
4. In vitro kinase activity assay of CDPK1
NOTE: The kinase activity of recombinant wild-type CDPK1 and the gatekeeper mutant proteins is evaluated by a semisynthetic epitope tagging approach as described by Allen et al.34.
5. Western blot analysis to detect the thio-phosphorylated products of the in vitro kinase assay
6. Cloning of guide sequence for targeting cdpk1 locus for introducing gatekeeper substitution
NOTE: The guide sequence of 20 nucleotides was selected by manual curation and cloned in pL6eGFP plasmid at BtgZI site by employing the following steps.
7. Cloning of homology arm for repair of Cas9 endonuclease restricted cdpk1 locus
NOTE: A homology arm comprising the SNPs to be introduced in the target locus is commercially synthesized. We usually take a homology arm of 400-1000 bp in length. The homology arm contains silent mutations in the guide RNA region and PAM to prevent the re-cutting of the modified locus after the incorporation of the desired SNPs. The homology arm (corresponding to nucleotides 133 to 553 of CDPK1), incorporating Met or Ser gatekeeper mutation and silent mutations, is flanked by AflII and SpeI restriction sites.
8. Purification of pL6CK1Met, pL6CK1Ser and pUF1 plasmids for malaria parasite transfection
9. In vitro culturing of Plasmodium falciparum and sorbitol synchronization for transfection
NOTE: P. falciparum in vitro culture in human red blood cells (RBCs) is performed according to the method outlined by Trager and Jensen36.
10. Transfection of ring stage parasite with pL6CK1Met, pL6CK1Ser and pUF1 plasmids
NOTE: The following steps are employed for the direct transfection of ring-stage parasites with plasmid DNA.
11. PCR verification of transgenic parasite with desired modification of cdpk1 locus
12. Limiting dilution for obtaining clonal transgenic parasites
13. Transcript analysis using Real-Time PCR
Recombinant WT CDPK1 is expressed as a fusion protein with an N-terminal Glutathione S-transferase (GST) tag and purified using GST affinity chromatography. The purified CDPK1 protein was detected through Western blot using anti-CDPK1 and anti-GST antibodies (Figure 1). The threonine gatekeeper residue (T145) in WT CDPK1 was replaced with Met and Ser using site-directed mutagenesis to generate CDPK1T145M and CDPK1T145S mutant recombinant proteins, respectively (Figure 2). In vitro kinase assay was done to evaluate the kinase activity of all the recombinant CDPK1 proteins. The kinase activity was tested using a semisynthetic epitope tagging approach34 by detecting the thio-phosphate ester group using a specific antibody in a Western blot format (Figure 3). The impact of gatekeeper substitution on the autophosphorylation activity of CDPK1 and the transphosphorylation of MBP used as an exogenous substrate of CDPK1 was assessed by quantifying the intensity of the respective autophosphorylation and transphosphorylation bands. Mutant CDPK1 with methionine gatekeeper retained ~ 53% transphosphorylation activity, while the presence of a serine at the gatekeeper position led to complete abrogation of substrate transphosphorylation (Figure 3). SNPs leading to gatekeeper substitution from Thr to Met (T145M) were engineered in the endogenous cdpk1 locus through CRISPR-Cas9 using a two-plasmid system (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Mutant parasites with T145S substitution could not be generated, possibly due to the lethal effect of the Ser gatekeeper on CDPK1 activity. The CDPK1T145M mutant parasites were subcloned using the limiting dilution method, and the gatekeeper substitution was confirmed through Sanger sequencing to verify the generation of the CDPK1T145M mutant parasite. Transcript levels of 11 different kinases, including 7 members of the CDPK family and 4 other kinases involved in the late schizogonic development of the parasite, were tested using real-time PCR (Figure 6). The expression levels of 11 different kinases were compared between the CDPK1T145M mutant and wild-type (WT) parasites, normalized to the housekeeping genes. The transcript expression of CDPK family members was altered in the CDPK1T145M mutant compared to the WT parasite (Figure 6). Transcripts showing higher expression in the CDPK1T145M mutant may be compensating for the function of CDPK1 in the CDPK1T145M mutant parasite.
Figure 1: Characterization of full-length recombinant wild type (WT) PfCDPK1. Full-length WT CDPK1 protein fused with N-terminal Glutathione S transferase (GST) tag was purified by affinity chromatography and separated on 10% SDS-PAGE. CDPK1 migrated to the predicted molecular mass of ~ 87 kDa, as shown in the Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 stained polyacrylamide gel. Recombinant protein separated on the SDS-PAGE was transferred to a PVDF membrane and processed for Western blot analysis with anti-CDPK1 and anti-GST antibodies. Band corresponding to the full-length recombinant CDPK1 on SDS-PAGE was detected with both the antibodies, confirming the identity of the protein. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Characterization of purified recombinant CDPK1 gatekeeper mutant proteins. (A) Alignment of the primary amino acid sequence of TgCDPK1 and PfCDPK1 (Plasmodb accession no. PF3D7_0217500). Threonine at position 145 of PfCDPK1 corresponds to glycine 128, the gatekeeper position in TgCDPK1 (highlighted in red). (B) Cartoonist representation of Thr gatekeeper residue (highlighted in red) encoded by triplet codon ACC (black circle) in WT CDPK1. Substitution of the gatekeeper residue by site-directed mutagenesis to generate recombinant mutant CDPK1 proteins with Met (highlighted in yellow) in CDPKT145M and Ser (highlighted in blue) in CDPKT145S. (C) SDS-PAGE profile of recombinant WT and mutant proteins of CDPK1. The recombinant WT and gatekeeper mutant proteins were purified by GST affinity chromatography and separated on SDS-PAGE. All the recombinant proteins conform to the expected molecular weight of ~87 kDa. M- molecular weight ladder. (D) Characterization of recombinant CDPK1 WT and mutant proteins through Western blotting. The recombinant WT and gatekeeper mutant proteins of CDPK1 were separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane for Western blotting. Bands corresponding to the full-length recombinant WT and mutant CDPK1 proteins on SDS-PAGE were detected with anti-CDPK1 and anti-GST antibodies, confirming the identity of all the recombinant proteins. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Gatekeeper substitution in CDPK1 leads to a decrease in the kinase activity of mutant enzymes. (A) Cartoonist representation of the semi-synthetic epitope tagging approach for detecting kinase activity of CDPK1 protein. Only transphosphorylation activity is depicted here. CDPK1 protein thiophosphorylates an exogenous substrate (S, solid green square) in the presence of ATPγS (solid yellow triangle), a source of transferable terminal thiophosphate group). The thiophosphorylated residue is alkylated by treatment with p-nitrobenzyl mesylate (PNBM), forming a thiophosphate ester that is then detected with an antibody that specifically recognizes alkylated thiophosphate adduct. (B) In vitro kinase activity assay using a semisynthetic epitope tagging approach was used to test the effect of gatekeeper substitution on the autophosphorylation and transphosphorylation potential of recombinant CDPK1 mutant proteins. All the recombinant proteins exhibit calcium-dependent kinase activity. Auto-phosphorylation of CDPK1 and trans-phosphorylation of myelin basic protein (MBP), an exogenous substrate, was evident only in the presence of calcium chloride (Ca2+), while no phosphorylation was detected in the presence of EGTA, a specific chelator of Ca2+ ions. The gatekeeper mutants show reduced autophosphorylation activity, while the transphosphorylation of MBP was completely abrogated in CDPK1T145S. CDPK1T145M retains transphosphorylation potential (~ 53 %) as reported earlier32. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Construction of plasmids for introducing SNPs at gatekeeper position in cdpk1 locus using CRISPR-Cas9. A guide sequence of 20 nucleotides corresponding to 432 to 451 bp was cloned in the BtgZI restriction site in pL6eGFP plasmid to generate pL6CK1G. A homology arm (421 bp) incorporating the desired SNPs (T145M or T145S, corresponding codon shown in green) along with shield mutations (shown in red) was cloned in pL6CK1G within AflII and SpeI restriction enzyme sites to generate pL6CK1GT145M and pL6CK1GT145M, respectively. Shield mutations prevent the re-cutting of the modified locus after the desired editing. Cas9 endonuclease encoded in a second plasmid, pUF1 is directed to the target site within cdpk1 locus with the help of guide RNA expressed from pL6CK1GT145M/S plasmid. Cas9 introduces double strand break in the target site towards the 5' side of PAM sequence. The DSB is repaired using homology arm in the pL6CK1GT145M/S plasmid. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Schematic representation of P. falciparum transfection with CRISPR plasmids for the introduction of gatekeeper mutation (T145M) in cdpk1 locus. i) Asynchronous P. falciparum culture is sorbitol treated to obtain synchronized ring-stage parasites. ii) Synchronized ring-stage parasites are taken in an electroporation cuvette along with pL6CK1GT145M/S and pUF1 plasmids resuspended in buffer solution. iii) The parasites are electroporated at 310 volts, 950 µF, and infinite resistance. iv) Following transfection, the parasites are transferred into a T25 flask containing fresh complete RPMI medium (cRPMI) and cultured for 48 h. After 48 h, the transfected parasites are switched to cRPMI supplemented with the drugs WR99210 and DSM267 and expanded in the T75 flask. v) On day 14, slides are prepared and stained using Giemsa stain. vi) Subsequently, the blood smear is visualized under a light microscope to assess the presence of parasitized RBCs. vii) Upon visualization, the parasites are allowed to grow in the presence of drugs. Subsequently, the parasites are processed to obtain the template for PCR and DNA sequencing for verification of the desired modification of the target cdpk1 locus. viii) Subsequent to the verification, clonal transgenic parasites are obtained by setting up limiting dilution in a 96-well plate. ix) Clonal transgenic parasites from positive wells are transferred into T25 flasks and allowed to grow. x) Clonal transgenic parasites are further validated through PCR and presence of desired SNPs at the gatekeeper position through DNA sequencing and analysis of the chromatogram. The figure is modified from32. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Schematic representation of the steps used for transcript analysis of target genes through real-time PCR (RT-PCR). i) P. falciparum culture with predominantly mature schizont stage parasites is obtained through sorbitol treatment in the same cycle. ii) The parasites are gently layered onto a gradient of 70/40 Percoll/sorbitol in a 15 mL conical tube for enrichment of mature schizont stage parasites. iii) The black-colored ring at the interphase of 40 % and 70 % personal/sorbitol is transferred to a fresh 50 mL tube, processed, and resuspended in cRPMI. The schizont-stage enriched parasites are incubated with fresh RBCs preincubated at 37 °C for invasion. iv) The parasites are cultured for 4 h and then treated with 5 % sorbitol to obtain highly synchronized 0-4 h ring stage parasites. v) The parasites are further cultured for an additional 44 h post-sorbitol treatment to obtain highly synchronized 44-48 h schizont stage parasites. vi) The synchronized parasites are treated with saponin to release them from the RBCs and stored in RNA extraction reagent. Total RNA is isolated from the RNA extraction resuspended parasites. vii) cDNA is prepared from the isolated RNA. viii) A real-time PCR experiment is set up with the cDNA template to amplify the target genes using gene-specific primers. The plate is run on a real-time PCR system. ix) The transcript expression data is analyzed using a analysis software. The graph represents differential transcript expression levels of 11 kinases in CDPK1 T145M parasites compared to the wild type (WT). This figure is modified from32. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Gene name | Primer sequence | |||
Pk1fpgex | ATGCGCGGATCCATGGGGTGTTCACAAAGTTCAAACG | |||
Pk1rpgex | ATGCGCGCGCGGCCGCTTATGAAGATTTATTATCACAAATTTTGTGCATC | |||
Ck1T145S | GTTTGATGTTTTTGAAGATAAGAAATATTTTTATTTAGTAAGCGAATTTTATGAAGGTGGGGAA | |||
Ck1T145S_antisense | TTCCCCACCTTCATAAAATTCGCTTACTAAATAAAAATATTTCTTATCTTCAAAAACATCAAAC | |||
CK1T145M | GTTTGATGTTTTTGAAGATAAGAAATATTTTTATTTAGTAATGGAATTTTATGAAGGTGGGGAA | |||
Ck1T145M_antisense | TTCCCCACCTTCATAAAATTCCATTACTAAATAAAAATATTTCTTATCTTCAAAAACATCAAAC | |||
Ck1GUIDEFWD | TAAGTATATAATATTAACCGAATTTTATGAAGGTGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAA | |||
Ck1GUIDEREV | TTCTAGCTCTAAAACCACCTTCATAAAATTCGGTTAATATTATATACTTA | |||
ck1f1 | ATTTTCTTTTCTGAACGTGTAACATG | |||
ck1r3wt | TGCATCTCTTAATCTCTCCTCACTG |
Table 1: List of Primers used in the study.
Gene Name | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer | ||
CDPK1 (PF3D7_0217500) | GGAAGAATTAGCAAATTTATTTGGTTTGACATC | ATGTTAACGAATTCATCAAAGTCAATCATGT | ||
CDPK2 (PF3D7_0610600) | GGAACAGGAGAATTTACAACGAC | TGTATACATAATAACACCACTAGACCAG | ||
CDPK3 (PF3D7_0310100) | CACGAAATATTGAGCATGGTAAAGAAGG | CAGCGTCCATTGTAAG ACATCTTTTTATTAAATC |
||
CDPK4 (PF3D7_0717500) | ATACTTCTCTCAGGGTGCCC | CTTATCACTAATTTTTTT GAATTGTGGTAAATCG |
||
CDPK5 (PF3D7_1337800) | GGAGGTCGAAGATATGGATACGAATAG | TATCGGCTAACGTACTCTTTGTCG | ||
CDPK6 (PF3D7_1122800) | CCTCCCGTAGATAAGAATATATTATCTATCG | ATCTGCTTCAATAAATCCCAATACATTTGC | ||
CDPK7 (PF3D7_1123100) | AGTCCTAAAAAAGATATA TAAAGAACTAGGTAGTAG |
TTTAAAAATAATCTTTCTCCCCACAACCC | ||
PKA (PF3D7_0934800) | AATCATCCATTTTGTGTAAATTTACATGG | CTTTTGTTTCTTCTTAAA AATGTAAAAAATTCTCC |
||
PKG (PF3D7_1436600) | AAAGGGAATGAAAGAAATAAAAAGAAGGC | CATATCAATATCTTCTGAAAGCTTTTCCC | ||
PKB (PF3D7_1246900) | CACAATAGAAGAAATGATGTTCTTTTTTACG | GAGAGCGCAATTAGCCATATTG | ||
PI3K (PF3D7_0515300) | CCCCTTCAATTTGTTTGTGAAACAG | ATCACATTTGTTATACTT ATTATCATCACATTTGTT |
||
GAPDH (PF3D7_1462800) | GGAAGGAAAGATATCGAAGTAG | GGGTTACCTCACATGG | ||
ThrRS (PF3D7_1126000) | CTTGGGAACTGCAGAGTAGAATTT | TAAAAATCCTCCGAACAATTTTTCTAAACTAC |
Table 2: List of target genes (PlasmoDB identification number) along with the sequence of the primers used for the real-time PCR analysis.
The generation of a mutant transgenic parasite containing a hypomorphic allele of cdpk1 is based on the in vitro kinase activity data with recombinant enzymes. It is better to generate as many mutant recombinant proteins with different gatekeeper residues as possible. Since the P. falciparum genome is highly AT-rich, therefore, expression of recombinant proteins in E. coli may require codon optimization. This will help in a comprehensive evaluation of gatekeeper substitution on the kinase activity of the mutant enzyme. Gatekeeper substitution that results in the reduction of the transphosphorylation potential is selected for generating an allelic exchange transgenic parasite. In parallel, a gatekeeper substitution that completely abrogates the transphosphorylation activity of the kinase should be taken as a negative control. Another important consideration while generating the allelic exchange parasite is to introduce a synonymous mutation along with the test mutation and the negative control. Generation of the parasite containing a synonymous mutation in the cdpk1 locus serves as an important internal control to rule out any technical errors while introducing the test mutation. Moreover, the transgenic parasite carrying synonymous mutation can be employed as a control for all the comparative studies instead of the WT parasite.
We have employed a two-plasmid system for generating the gatekeeper mutant parasite32,35. However, the efficiency of introducing the SNP in the target locus can be increased by using a single plasmid system instead of two-plasmid system41. In the single plasmid system, all the critical elements that are required for CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene editing are incorporated in a single plasmid instead of two. The single plasmid encodes Cas9 endonuclease, transcribes sgRNA constituted of tracrRNA and the guide RNA, and contains a homology arm for the repair of the double-strand break introduced by the Cas9 endonuclease at the target site. In a two-plasmid system, the parasites are co-transfected with both plasmids. Since the number of parasites receiving both plasmids simultaneously in a two-plasmid system will be low compared to a single-plasmid system therefore, the efficiency of CRISPR-mediated gene editing is lower in a two-plasmid system compared to a single-plasmid system. Alternatively, a suicide-rescue strategy42 can also be employed wherein the homology arm is provided as a linear fragment or in a plasmid without a drug selection marker (rescue plasmid). The Cas9 endonuclease and the sgRNA encoding guide RNA are provided in a plasmid containing a drug selection cassette (suicide plasmid). Since a linear fragment or a plasmid without a drug selection cassette is more likely to be lost during parasite replication, the double-strand break introduced by the Cas9 endonuclease in the target locus must be readily repaired using the homology arm that can be available for a limited duration. This strategy has some advantages over a two-plasmid system since it is more efficient, and there is no need to sub-clone the homology arm in a different plasmid. Other variations of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing may also be considered for introducing SNP in the target locus43.
We manually selected the guide region for introducing T145M substitution in the cdpk1 locus. An appropriate guide sequence for introducing double-strand break in target locus can be selected using various freely available online software such as Chopchop44, CRISPOR45, CCTop46, Cas-OFFinder47. These software, in addition to providing the efficiency of each guide sequence, also provides the off-target and specificity scores, which increase the success rate of a CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing experiment.
There are different methods available for the transfection of malaria parasites. We use ring-stage parasites for transfection experiments48,49, however, pre-loading of RBCs with plasmids has also been used successfully for parasite transfection studies50. In this method, RBCs are transfected with plasmids under a specific set of parameters through electroporation and are subsequently used for infection with purified late-stage parasites. The parasites invade RBCs that are pre-loaded with plasmids. During their growth within the RBCs pre-loaded with plasmids, the parasite takes up plasmid DNA through an unknown mechanism50. There is another method that can be employed for parasite transfection that requires very mature purified schizont-stage parasites for direct transfection with the plasmids. The instrument used for the transfection of the purified schizonts is 4D-nucleofector51. The choice of a transfection method varies amongst different research groups depending on the available resources and success rate. It is a good idea to check which of the three methods work for a group and employ that for subsequent transfection experiments. Two methods may be applied consecutively to further increase the transfection efficiency. For instance, the first transfection step may employ ring-stage parasites followed by the addition of fresh RBCs pre-loaded with the plasmids.
We selected only a few genes for transcript analysis in the CDPK1T145M parasites compared to the control based on previous literature or the presence of members of the CDPK family. However, to get a comprehensive view of global transcriptional rewiring in the transgenic parasite containing a hypomorphic allele of CDPK1 approaches such as RNA-Seq or microarray may be employed.
The method used in this study can be applied to other kinases of the malaria parasite to understand the development of compensatory mechanisms under drug pressure. The information obtained through this technique may be useful in the strategic deployment of combination drugs to avoid the development and spread of drug resistance. Targeting two or multiple kinases that show functional complementation is a better strategy than targeting individual kinases for malaria control and elimination.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We acknowledge the support and facilities available through the Central Instrumentation Facility, School of Life Sciences, JNU. Financial support from the Department of Biotechnology (BT/PR28256/MED/29/1313/2018) to AB is also gratefully acknowledged. We thank Jose-Juan Lopez-Rubio for providing pL6eGFP and pUF1 plasmids. The funding agency has no role in the preparation and decision to publish the work. MS is a recipient of JRF-SRF Fellowship from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
1x phosphate inhibitor cocktail | Sigma-Aldrich | 04906 845001 | |
AflII | NEB | R0520S | |
Albumax II | Gibco | 11021-037 | |
Anti-GST antibody | ThermoFisher Scientific | G7781 | |
Anti-Mouse HRP | Sigma-Aldrich | A4416 | |
Anti-Rabbit HRP | Sigma-Aldrich | A6154 | |
BamHI | NEB | R3136S | |
BtgZ1 | NEB | R0703S | |
Centrifuge | ThermoFisher Scientific | Sorvall legend micro 17R | |
Centrifuge ( For pelleting Bacterial cell) | ThermoFisher Scientific | Sorvall ST 8R | |
Centrifuge ( For pelleting/processing parasite) | ThermoFisher Scientific | Sorvall ST 8R (TX-400 rotor) | |
DpnI | NEB | RO1765 | |
D-Sorbitol | Sigma-Aldrich | S1876 | |
E. coli BLR(DE3) pLysS competent cells | Sigma-Aldrich | 69956 | |
E. coli DH5a Competent Cells | Takara Bio | 9057 | |
Electroporation Cuvettes, 0.2 cm gap | BioRad | 1652086 | |
Electroporator | BioRad | GenePulser Xcell | |
femtoLUCENTTM PLUS HRP chemiluminescent reagent | G-Bioscience | 7860-003 | |
Gentamicin | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15750078 | |
Giemsa Stain | Himedia | S011-100ML | |
Glutathione Sepharose 4B | GE Healthcare | 17075601 | |
HEPES, Free Acid | Merck | 391338 | |
Hypoxanthine | Merck | 4010CBC | |
In-fusion HD cloning Kit | Takara Bio | 1711641A | |
iQ SYBR Green Supermix | BioRad | 1708880EDU | |
MBP, dephosphorylated | Merck | 13-110 | |
NotI | NEB | R3189S | |
Nucleobond Xtra Maxi EF | Takara Bio | 740424 | |
NucleoSpin Gel and PCR clean-up Mini kit | Takara Bio | 740609 | |
Percoll | GE Healthcare | 17-0891-01 | |
p-nitrobenzyl mesylate (PNBM) | Abcam | Ab138910 | |
Primestar Max DNA Polymerase | Takara Bio | R045A | |
Protease inhibitor cocktail | Roche | 11836170001 | |
Qiaprep Spin Miniprep Kit | Qiagen | 27106 | |
QuikChange II XL site-directed mutagenesis kit | Agilent | 200521 | |
RNeasy Mini kit | Qiagen | 74104 | |
RPMI-1640 | ThermoFisher Scientific | 31800-105 | |
Saponin | Sigma-Aldrich | 47036 | |
Sodium Bicarbonate | Sigma-Aldrich | S5761 | |
SpeI-HF | NEB | R3133S | |
SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis kit | ThermoFisher Scientific | 18080-051 | |
T4 DNA Ligase | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15224017 | |
Thiophosphate ester antibody | Abcam | Ab92570 |