Summary

Stimulation à courant continu et multi-réseau d'électrodes d'enregistrement de la capture comme activité chez la souris Cerveau Slice Préparation

Published: June 07, 2016
doi:

Summary

Studies have shown that cathodal transcranial direct-current stimulation can produce suppressive effects on drug-resistant seizures. In this study, an in vitro experimental setup was devised in which the direct-current stimulation and multielectrode array recording of seizure-like activity were evaluated in mice brain slice preparation. The direct-current stimulation parameters were evaluated.

Abstract

la stimulation directe du courant transcrânienne cathodique (STCC) induit des effets suppresseurs sur les saisies résistantes aux médicaments. Pour effectuer des actions efficaces, les paramètres de stimulation (par exemple, l' orientation, l' intensité du champ, et la durée de stimulation) doivent être examinés dans les préparations de tranche des souris du cerveau. Agencer les essais et l'orientation de l'électrode par rapport à la position de la tranche de cerveau des souris sont possibles. La présente méthode permet de conserver la voie thalamocingulate pour évaluer l'effet du DCS sur les activités de saisie comme cortex cingulaire antérieur. Les résultats des enregistrements de matrice à canaux multiples indiquent que DCS cathodique diminué de manière significative l'amplitude de la réponse de stimulation évoquée et la durée de la 4-aminopyridine et l'activité épileptique analogue induite par la bicuculline. Cette étude a également révélé que les applications DCS cathodiques à 15 min causé la dépression à long terme dans la voie thalamocingulate. La présente étude examine les effets de DCS sur thalamocingulate plasticité synaptique et les activités de saisie comme aiguë. La procédure actuelle permet de tester les paramètres de stimulation optimale dont l' orientation, l' intensité du champ et de la durée de stimulation dans un modèle in vitro de la souris. En outre, la méthode peut évaluer les effets de DCS sur les activités de saisie comme corticales aux niveaux cellulaires et réseau.

Introduction

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder. Thirty percent of patients with epilepsy suffer from drug-resistant seizures1. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) provides a noninvasive approach to control or alter network activities across large brain areas, such as seizures. Clinical studies have shown that tDCS effectively treats intractable seizures2 and can produce both short- and long-term suppressive effects on seizures3-5. However, the therapeutic mechanism of tDCS actions is still unclear. The brain slice model presented is an in vitro method to investigate how the therapeutic mechanism of tDCS actions alters the symptoms of seizure-like brain activities. Accordingly, to achieve its optimal effects, specific stimulation parameters including orientation, field strength, and stimulation duration need to be tested in an experimental model. Previous studies have shown that the orientation of the electric field is important to obtain therapeutic effects6. Thus, testing and arranging the orientation of electrodes relative to the position of the tested brain slice are feasible.

Frontal lobe epilepsy and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) seizures are often drug-resistant7,8. Some studies have reported the application of tDCS in the cingulate cortex9-11. tDCS is shown to affect vigilance, decision making and emotion through alteration of ACC activities, and can modulate neuronal excitability and seizure activity in this brain region12. Therefore, suppressive effects of tDCS on ACC seizures might be helpful for clinical treatment and the evaluation of alternative treatments.

The present protocol describes the preparation of an electrode in the recording chamber for DCS of a brain slice and its effect on seizure-like activity recording with a multielectrode array (MEA).

Protocol

Les procédures qui impliquent des sujets animaux ont été approuvés par le Comité d'utilisation des institutions de protection des animaux et, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. 1. Préparation de la solution expérimentale et équipements pour multiélectrodes Tableau d'enregistrement Préparer artificielle liquide céphalo – rachidien (aCSF; 124 mM de NaCl, KCl 4,4, 1 mM de NaH 2 PO 3, 2 mM MgSO4, CaCl2 2 mM, 25 mM NaHCO <sub…

Representative Results

Préparation de la configuration Thalamocingulate Slice et système d'enregistrement MEA La tranche MT-ACC de souris est une préparation de tranche spéciale qui permet l' exploration des propriétés électrophysiologiques de la voie de thalamocingulate. Figure 1A montre la façon dont la tranche MT-ACC a été préparé. Le cerveau de la souris a été rapidement enlevé et conservé dans un endroit…

Discussion

Dans la présente étude, les effets de la durée et de l'orientation du DCS sur l'activité de saisie de type ACC ont été testés. Pour obtenir des données stables dans des tranches de cerveau de souris, comment garder l'intégrité de la voie MT-ACC et pour éviter tout dommage, il est essentiel, en particulier les étapes dans lesquelles deux coupes ventrales angle et une coupe dorsale du cortex sont faites. De plus, le temps de préparer la tranche de cerveau peut également affecter l'activité d…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the technical support from the Neural Circuit Electrophysiology Core at Academia Sinica. This work was supported by the National Science Council (102-2320-B-001-026-MY3 and 100-2311-B-001-003-MY3) and Neuroscience Program of Academia Sinica.

Materials

Anesthetic:
Isoflurane Halocarbon Products Corporation  NDC 12164-002-25 4%
Name Company Catalog Number Comments
aCSF (total:1L):
D(+)-Glucose MERCK 1.08337.1000 10 mM
Sodium hydrogen carbonate MERCK 1.06329.0500 25 mM
Sodium chloride MERCK 1.06404.1000 124 mM
(+)-Sodium L-ascorbate, >=98% SIGMA A4034-100G 0.15 g / 2 c.c
Magnesium sulfate, anhydrous,ReagentPlus SIGMA M7506-500G 2 mM
Calcium chloride dihydrate MERCK 1.02382.1000 2 mM
Sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate MERCK 1.06346.1000 1 mM
Potassium chloride May & Baker LTD Dagenham England MS 7616 4.4 mM
Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Drugs:
(+)-Bicuculline TOCRIS 0130 5 µM in aCSF
4-Aminopyridine TOCRIS 0940 250 µM in aCSF
Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Brain slice Preparation:
Vibratome Vibratome Series 1000 Block slicing into 500 µm thick slices
Name Company Catalog Number Comments
MEA system:
Multielectrode array (MEA) probes: 6 x 10 planar MEA Multi Channel Systems 60MEA500/30iR-Ti-pr MEAS 6×10 electrode diameter, 30 µm; electrode spacing, 500 µm; impedance, 50 kΩ at 200 Hz
Multielectrode array (MEA) probes: 8 x 8 MEA  Ayanda Biosystems 60MEA200/10iR-Ti-pr MEAS 8×8 pyramidal-shaped electrode; diameter, 40 µm; tip height, 50 µm; electrode spacing, 200 µm; impedance, 1000 kΩ at 200 Hz
A 60-channel amplifier was used with a band-pass filter set between 0.1 Hz and 3 KHz at 1200X amplification Multi-Channel Systems MEA-1060-BC
MC Rack software at a 10 KHz sampling rate Multi-Channel Systems Software for data collect and recordings
control of a pulse generator Multi-Channel Systems STG 1002
slice anchor kits and hold-downs Warner Instruments SHD-26H/10; WI64-0250
Peristaltic Pump-minipuls3 Gilsom MINIPULS3 perfusion rate : 8 ml/min
Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Stimulation system:
Isolated stimulator A-M Systems Model 2100 intensity of ±350 μA , duration of 200 μs
Tungsten electrode A-M Systems 575300 placed in thalamus

References

  1. Schiller, Y., Najjar, Y. Quantifying the response to antiepileptic drugs: effect of past treatment history. Neurology. 70 (1), 54-65 (2008).
  2. Fregni, F., et al. A controlled clinical trial of cathodal DC polarization in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 47 (2), 335-342 (2006).
  3. Auvichayapat, N., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of refractory childhood focal epilepsy. Brain Stimul. 6 (4), 696-700 (2013).
  4. Chung, M. G., Lo, W. D. Noninvasive brain stimulation: the potential for use in the rehabilitation of pediatric acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 96 (4 Suppl), S129-S137 (2015).
  5. Del Felice, A., Magalini, A., Masiero, S. Slow-oscillatory Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Memory in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy by Altering Sleep Spindle Generators: A Possible Rehabilitation Tool. Brain Stimul. 8 (3), 567-573 (2015).
  6. Garnett, E. O., Malyutina, S., Datta, A., den Ouden, D. B. On the Use of the Terms Anodal and Cathodal in High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Technical Note. Neuromodulation. , (2015).
  7. Biraben, A., et al. Fear as the main feature of epileptic seizures. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 70 (2), 186-191 (2001).
  8. Zaatreh, M. M., et al. Frontal lobe tumoral epilepsy: clinical, neurophysiologic features and predictors of surgical outcome. Epilepsia. 43 (7), 727-733 (2002).
  9. Karim, A. A., et al. The truth about lying: inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior. Cereb. Cortex. 20 (1), 205-213 (2010).
  10. Keeser, D., et al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J. Neurosci. 31 (43), 15284-15293 (2011).
  11. Nelson, J. T., McKinley, R. A., Golob, E. J., Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R. Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuroimage. 85 (Pt 3), 909-917 (2014).
  12. Chang, W. P., Lu, H. C., Shyu, B. C. Treatment with direct-current stimulation against cingulate seizure-like activity induced by 4-aminopyridine and bicuculline in an in vitro mouse model. Exp. Neurol. 265, 180-192 (2015).
  13. Lee, C. M., Chang, W. C., Chang, K. B., Shyu, B. C. Synaptic organization and input-specific short-term plasticity in anterior cingulate cortical neurons with intact thalamic inputs. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25 (9), 2847-2861 (2007).
  14. Chang, W. P., Shyu, B. C., Pandalai, S. G. Involvement of the thalamocingulate pathway in the regulation of cortical seizure activity. Recent Research Developments in Neuroscience. 4, 1-27 (2013).
  15. Brummer, S. B., Turner, M. J. Electrochemical considerations for safe electrical stimulation of the nervous system with platinum electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 24 (1), 59-63 (1977).
  16. Durand, D. M., Bikson, M. Suppression and control of epileptiform activity by electrical stimulation: a review. Proc. IEEE. 89 (7), 1065-1082 (2001).
  17. Fritsch, B., et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 66 (2), 198-204 (2010).

Play Video

Cite This Article
Lu, H., Chang, W., Chang, W., Shyu, B. Direct-current Stimulation and Multi-electrode Array Recording of Seizure-like Activity in Mice Brain Slice Preparation. J. Vis. Exp. (112), e53709, doi:10.3791/53709 (2016).

View Video