Live cell imaging of alphaherpes virus infections enables analysis of the dynamic events of directed transport and intercellular spread. Here, we present methodologies that utilize recombinant viral strains expressing fluorescent fusion proteins to facilitate visualization of viral assemblies during infection of primary neurons.
Advances in live cell fluorescence microscopy techniques, as well as the construction of recombinant viral strains that express fluorescent fusion proteins have enabled real-time visualization of transport and spread of alphaherpes virus infection of neurons. The utility of novel fluorescent fusion proteins to viral membrane, tegument, and capsids, in conjunction with live cell imaging, identified viral particle assemblies undergoing transport within axons. Similar tools have been successfully employed for analyses of cell-cell spread of viral particles to quantify the number and diversity of virions transmitted between cells. Importantly, the techniques of live cell imaging of anterograde transport and spread produce a wealth of information including particle transport velocities, distributions of particles, and temporal analyses of protein localization. Alongside classical viral genetic techniques, these methodologies have provided critical insights into important mechanistic questions. In this article we describe in detail the imaging methods that were developed to answer basic questions of alphaherpes virus transport and spread.
Infection of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) by alphaherpes viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) -1, -2, and pseudorabies virus (PRV) involves several intricate and highly regulated steps throughout the viral life cycle. Transport within neurons of the PNS is critical during the events of both primary viral infection and subsequent inter-host spread. The molecular mechanisms that modulate two components of the viral life cycle; directed transport of viral assemblies away from cell bodies within axons (anterograde transport) and subsequent transmission of virions to susceptible cells (anterograde spread) are important to understanding herpesvirus pathogenesis.
The transport and egress of viral particles in neurons is dependent on assembly of a mature infectious virion 1,2. Previously fixed assays, including immunofluorescence (IF) and electron microscopy (EM), were used to study the particle assembly state and protein interactions associated with virion transport and spread 3-6. However the dynamic nature of transporting virions and experimental artifacts introduced by chemical fixation confounded the interpretation of fixed images 7,8. Recently, a number of viral-fluorescent fusion proteins have been described for HSV and PRV that have negligible impacts on protein function. Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and Red fluorescent proteins (mCherry or mRFP) fluorophores are often paired to allow imaging of two of the three structural components of a mature virion: capsid, tegument, and glycoprotein 9-11. Live cell imaging of anterograde transport using dual-labeled viruses visualizes the assembly state of viral particles during transport. Similar fluorophore expressing viral strains are used to visualize number and the diversity of viral genomes following spread 12,13. The properties of the fluorescent proteins (reviewed in 14,15) greatly impact the ability to visualize viral or cellular assemblies. The intrinsic properties of the fluorescent protein, including self-interactions and stability, should be considered when designing and testing novel protein fusions for the preservation of wild-type functionality.
In conjunction with fluorescent protein fusions, two well-characterized in vitro cell culture systems are employed for live cell imaging of herpes virus infection: dissociated 16 and compartmentalized 17 (Figure 1A) rat superior cervical ganglia (SCG) neurons. In both systems, embryonic SCG’s are dissected, dissociated to single cell bodies, and plated for in vitro culturing 18. SCG neurons are part of the autonomic nervous system and can be readily cultured and differentiated by neuronal growth factor (NGF) into a mature polarized state ex vivo. Dissociated SCG neurons form an extended network of axons that allows for the visualization of viral particles as they undergo anterograde transport 6. Compartmentalized SCG cultures provide fluidic isolation of the neuronal cell body (S compartment) and distal axon termini (N compartment) 19. A number of detailed protocols for the construction and use of compartmentalized neurons using original 20 or modified Campenot chambers 17 have been published previously. Fluidic isolation allows for selective infection of neuronal cell bodies and detection of progeny virions after transport to isolated axon termini. Plating epithelial cells over the termini prior to infection provides recipient cells for spread of viral infection.
There are many essential elements important for all live cell imaging experimentation, but the most relevant to our protocols are: automated image acquisition, fluorescent illumination, speed of imaging, and environmental control. For all imaging experiments, we use an inverted, automated, epifluorescence illumination microscope (Figure 1B). The microscope is built around the Nikon Eclipse Ti base and employs a number of computer controlled motorized systems to rapidly reconfigure the microscope during automated image acquisition. For fluorescence illumination, we use a broad-spectrum mercury arc lamp that can be attenuated with neutral density filters along the illumination path. Excitation filters limit the spectrum of fluorescent illumination and when paired with multi-pass dichroic mirrors and fluorescence emission filters visualize specific fluorescent compounds. The excitation and emission filters are mounted in independent, fast switching filter wheels to enable rapid sequential acquisition of different fluorescent channels. The speed of image acquisition is further enhanced with a sensitive and fast EM-CCD camera, useful for detection of low intensity signals and short image read times. Environmental control on the microscope is achieved with a stage top heated incubator and an objective lens heater to maintain samples at elevated temperatures while a humidified and CO2 enriched atmosphere is passed into the incubator. The microscope is kept in a darkened room with ambient temperature maintained close to 25 °C and outside light minimized with blackout curtains on all windows. The following protocols describe the use of this system for anterograde transport and spread assays.
A number of alternatives exist to control for the variables of live cell imaging. The control of microscopy settings can be performed manually or through automated systems dependent on proprietary software. Fluorescence illumination can be achieved with halogen, LED or laser sources. The speed of imaging is modified by the speed of filter switching and the time to visualize the signal with the paired detection system. Environmental control can be achieved with specialized hardware on the microscope stage, enclosure of all or part of the microscope in a heated and humidified box, or by elevating the temperature of the room where microscopy will be performed. Each of these alternatives has advantages and disadvantages related to cost and performance.
In the subsequent protocol, we detail the use of live cell imaging to study rapid anterograde transport and anterograde spread of alphaherpes viruses through the use of recombinant viral strains. Real-time live cell imaging visualizes capsid, tegument, and/or glycoprotein co-localization on dynamic structures undergoing transport within axons 11. Overnight timelapse imaging of compartmentalized neuronal cultures visualizes axonal virion egress and infection of susceptible cells 12. The protocols presented here have been optimized for use with our particular imaging system, but are presented in broad terms relative to the four elements of live cell imaging. In the discussion we will further detail some of the optimization that is necessary for successful experimentation.
Section 1 – Environmental Control Conditions for Live-cell Fluorescence Microscopy
Section 2 – Real-time Imaging of Anterograde Virion Transport Events Protocol
Section 3 – Overnight Time-lapse Imaging of Anterograde Spread Events
Section 4 – Image Processing and Export
Data Export
Anterograde Transport
Application of this protocol to infections of dissociated SCG cultures with PRV 348, a recombinant PRV strain expressing GFP-Us9 and gM-mCherry membrane fusion proteins, has facilitated the visualization of the anterograde transport of virions (Figure 3 and Supplemental Movie 4). Incorporation of these fusion proteins into viral particles results in their detection on transporting puncta, and the aforementioned imaging conditions minimize the offset of each fluorophore on a moving particle during filter switching. In a three-minute imaging window, numerous transporting puncta are commonly observed and large sample sizes for colocalization analyses are rapidly generated. We have previously quantified the colocalization of GFP-Us9, the alphaherpes virus axonal targeting protein, with other structural proteins using this approach 11. Similar analyses of other dual recombinant PRV strains have also been described 11, and recent work has documented the co-transport of PRV proteins with a fluorescently tagged host motor protein in a further extension of this protocol 21. Utilizing fast switching filter wheels and paired multi-pass dichroic mirrors allows rapid sequential acquisition of two or more fluorescent channels. We can currently achieve two-channel sequential acquisition at speeds of up to 0.8 frames per second. For single channel video microscopy, which is limited only by the fluorescence exposure time and read-time of the camera, we can achieve acquisition rates greater than 6 frames per second.
Anterograde Spread
To visualize anterograde spread events, areas of interest are visualized every 5 to 10 min for a 20 hr period, during which time virions will transport down and egress from axons, infecting the nearby epithelial cells. A representative frame from the large image area is presented in Figure 4A and Supplemental Movie 5. Note the spatially separated nature of the fluorescent protein expressing cells, indicative of primary infection from axons. Infected cells can be tracked backwards during the movie to visualize the fluorescent capsids that initiated the viral infection. These individual cells can be isolated from the large frame and tracked without a significant loss of detail. The representative frame (Figure 4B) from Supplemental Movie 6 depicts a time after virions have deposited the fluorescent capsid into the cytoplasm.
Data Analysis
A range of different analyses can be performed on live-cell imaging datasets including particle tracking, colocalization studies, and quantification of virion spread events. We often perform our analyses directly in the NIS Elements software or utilizing a plug-in extension available for the ImageJ software package that enables .nd2 file type support. Different hypotheses and experimental setups necessitate unique analytical methods. Our group has described methods for assessing colocalization of fluorescent proteins on dynamic structures 11,21 and time-lapse quantification of individual particle spread events 10,12,22. The methodologies describe in this manuscript and our previous studies are flexible and can be applied to different viral infections as well as the transport of cellular structures, e.g. mitochondria 23.
Figure 1. Schematic of microscopy set up for live cell imaging. A) Culture types employed for studies of anterograde transport (dissociated) and anterograde spread (chambered) respectively. Panel 1 is a phase contrast image of a mature, dissociated Superior Cervical Ganglia (SCG). Panel 2 is a schematic of the compartmentalized culture system, pictured in panel 3, with SCG neurons plated in the left compartment with axonal projections extending beneath the internal barriers into the far right compartment. B) The inverted epifluorescent microscope and stage top incubator configuration used for video microscopy experiments. Click here to view larger figure.
Figure 2. NIS-Elements software interface. A screenshot of a standard user interface in NIS-Elements is displayed. The Play and Stop buttons control the live-image window depicting the current hardware configurations for imaging as well as what is currently being imaged. Across the top panel are a series of Optical Configurations that implement preset hardware settings to configure the microscope for trans-illuminated or fluorescence detection. The Camera control and exposure settings allow configuration of camera detection to optimize image quality and speed. All experiments are coordinated using ND Acquisition controls. Click here to view larger figure.
Figure 3. Live cell imaging of SCG axons at 8 hr post-infection with PRV 348. PRV 348 infected neurons express the GFP-Us9 and gM-mCherry membrane fusion proteins. Anterograde-transporting structures within distal axons are visualized in two fluorescent channels, GFP and mCherry. An anterograde-transporting structure (white arrow) progresses within the axon as depicted in the sequential images taken from Supplemental Movie 4. The two fluorescent proteins are spatially off-set due to sequential acquisition of fluorescent channels and the rapid movement of viral structures. Click here to view larger figure.
Figure 4. Overnight timelapse imaging of anterograde spread events from infected axons to epithelial cell clusters during a multi-color infection. Representative images from a single position, large image tiled time-lapse movie of virion transmission from PRV 427 infected axons into recipient epithelial cells. A) A merged image of the transmitted, YFP and RFP fluorescent images at a time post infection where recipient cells are beginning to express the YFP-CAAX and VP26-mRFP fusion proteins. In the second panel, the YFP and RFP channels are shown together. Note the large number of mRFP puncta associated with the axon tracts. These are assembled virions undergoing long distance transport within axons (Supplemental Movie 2). The white box represents the area of interest highlighted in part B. B) Representative image of recipient epithelial cells containing infecting capsid assemblies (See also Supplemental Movie 3). Panel 1 is a merge of the transmitted and RFP channels. Panel 2 is the RFP channel alone. Panel 3 is the RFP channel with a schematic representation of the cell outline (solid white line), nucleus (hashed white line), and axons (blue lines). Click here to view larger figure.
Supplemental Movie 1. Software settings for rapid, sequential acquisition of axonal virions. The steps associated with determining exposure settings, configuring ND acquisition controls, and acquiring a rapid frame acquisition movie of fluorescent virions undergoing axonal transport is presented. The SCG neuron culture was infected with PRV 427 eight hours prior to imaging. Click here to view movie.
Supplemental Movie 2. Software settings for overnight imaging of axon-to-cell spread. The steps associated with configuring ND acquisition controls for overnight imaging of axon-to-cell spread events are presented. Click here to view movie.
Supplemental Movie 3. Conversion of .nd2 files into presentable movie formats. The steps associated with converting the raw data .nd2 files into either .avi or .mov file formats for presentation using common video players. Click here to view movie.
Supplemental Movie 4. Live cell imaging of SCG axons at 8 hr post-infection with PRV 348. Click here to view movie.
Supplemental Movie 5. Large image area of overnight imaging of axon-to-cell spread. Click here to view movie.
Supplemental Movie 6. Enlarged area of overnight timelapse imaging of axon-to-cell spread. Click here to view movie.
Strain | Genotype | Utility |
PRV 341 | GFP-Us9 (membrane) / mRFP-Vp26 (capsid) | Virion transport experiments11 |
PRV 348 | GFP-Us9 (membrane) / gM-mCherry (membrane) | Virion transport experiments11 |
PRV 427 | mRFP-VP26 (capsid)/ YFP-CAAX (cellular plasma membrane) | Anterograde spread experiments10 |
Table 1. Useful recombinant PRV strains expressing fluorescent fusion proteins.
Name | Company | Catalogue number |
35 mm glass bottom culture dish | MatTek Corporation; Ashland, MA | P35G-1.5-20-C |
35 mm μ-Dish | Ibidi USA LLC, Verona, WI | 81156 |
Microscope body | Nikon Instruments Inc. | Nikon Eclipse Ti |
Motorized microscope X-Y stage | Prior Scientific; Rockland, MA | H117 ProScan Flat Top |
Motorized filter wheels | Prior Scientific | HF110 10 position filter wheel |
Fluorescent illumination source | Lumen Dynamics; Mississauga, Ontario Canada | X-Cite 120Q |
Multi-band Fluorescence filter sets | Chroma Technology Corp.; Bellows Falls, VT | 89000 Sedat Quad – ET 89006 ECFP/EYFP/mCherry – ET |
EM-CCD camera | Andor Technology USA; South Windsor, CT | iXon3 897 |
Chamlide stage top environmental incubator | Live Cell Instruments; Seoul, South Korea | TC-L-10 |
Objective lens heater | Bioptecs; Butler, PA | 150803 Controller 150819-12-08 Heater |
Analysis software | Nikon Instruments Inc.; Melville, NY | NIS Elements |
Table 2. Specific reagents and equipment.
The goal of live cell imaging is observing biological processes as they occur without significant alteration by the act of observation. This goal is achieved by optimizing three variables: environmental control, speed of imaging, and fluorescence illumination. These inter-dependent variables must be balanced to achieve viable imaging conditions. The protocols presented utilize specific conditions to produce the representative results. We will briefly discuss environmental controls and observational damage before detailing the specific methods presented.
Establishing and maintaining relevant biological conditions on the microscope is critical to the successful monitoring of cellular events. Achieving target conditions is dependent on a number of variables specific to the microscope and incubator configuration. All incubator settings should be validated using an independent temperature measurement of a mock sample in the incubator taken at multiple positions including; the point of objective contact, the middle of the culture dish, and the edge of the culture dish. Settings should be optimized to minimize areas that are more than 1 °C warmer than 37 °C as well as maintaining a temperature close to 37 °C at the point of objective contact. Each culture dish and objective configuration used for imaging must be tested and validated prior to experimentation. Ideally, all samples would be monitored for temperature during imaging, but this proves impractical for a number of systems and is complicated when biologically hazardous agents are employed. Validation of incubation conditions is important, as incubating samples at too low or too high of a temperature can result in artifactual results or rapid cellular degradation.
Identifying and minimizing results arising from observational damage is important for protocol development. Frequent illumination can alter biological processes, irreversibly inactivate fluorescent molecules, or induce a number of cellular death pathways. Validating temperature is important to reproduce biologically similar conditions on the stage top analogous to those of a standard tissue culture incubator. Controlling for the effects of frequent illumination is more difficult and often requires iterative trial and error practices. Comparing parallel samples kept in tissue culture incubators for morphological differences or biologically relevant alterations can determine if live-cell imaging conditions results in significant cellular toxicity. In the experiments described here, we have monitored the productivity of viral infection through viral titer as well as extent of viral spread between cells.
Achieving real-time imaging of fast transport within axons requires the optimization of image acquisition speed alongside the intensity of fluorescence illumination. The speed of image acquisition is determined by the camera settings and the microscope hardware, especially when collecting multiple fluorescent channels sequentially. Illumination intensity affects the quality of fluorescent signals and the rate of acquisition. Greater illumination intensity allows easier visualization of fluorescent proteins, particularly for those that incorporate into particles in small quantities. However, the sample will bleach faster and suffer from enhanced phototoxic damage. Reducing illumination through neutral density filters requires longer exposure times, reducing the frequency of image acquisition and potentially causing spatial deformation of fluorescent structures due to their movement during detection. Finding the correct balance of illumination intensity with image acquisition frequency depends greatly on the fluorescent protein signal and the rate of motility of the structure being studied. It is only necessary to acquire enough signal to distinguish the fluorescent structures above background, rather than produce high contrast images that require longer exposure times.
Overnight timelapse imaging utilizes a similar hardware configuration as real-time live-cell imaging but is significantly impacted by accumulated photo-damage associated with long term, frequent fluorescence illumination. Unlike real-time imaging, the need to limit fluorescence illumination intensity is paramount, and all other variables are modified to account for this restriction. Limiting the intensity of exposure allows for more frequent illumination of multiple fluorescent channels without significantly damaging the imaged cells. Anterograde axon-to-cell spread events are temporally and spatially disparate, so imaging a large area is essential to capture as many of these infrequent events as possible.
A number of publications have provided thorough overviews and recommendations for live cell imaging practices 24-26. The protocols detailed here represent our best attempts to minimize the impact of fluorescence imaging on viral replication, transport, and spread while preserving the essential features of viral infection. Combining these protocols with the careful development of fluorescent fusion proteins and robust neuronal cultures has answered my fundamental questions of herpesvirus infection and pathogenesis.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
L.W.E. and R.K. are supported by the US National Institutes of Health grants R37 NS033506-16 and R01 NS060699-03. M.P.T. was supported by an American Cancer Society Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (PF-10-057-01-MPC). The advice and knowledge of Dr. Matthew Lyman and Dr. Oren Kobiler were instrumental in designing the microscope configuration and live cell imaging methods. We also extend thanks to Neal Barlow and Brian T. Kain of Nikon Instruments for their technical assistance in the acquisition, installation and performance of the microscope.
Name | Company | Catalogue number |
35 mm glass bottom culture dish | MatTek Corporation; Ashland, MA | P35G-1.5-20-C |
35 mm μ-Dish | Ibidi USA LLC, Verona, WI | 81156 |
Microscope body | Nikon Instruments Inc. | Nikon Eclipse Ti |
Motorized microscope X-Y stage | Prior Scientific; Rockland, MA | H117 ProScan Flat Top |
Motorized filter wheels | Prior Scientific | HF110 10 position filter wheel |
Fluorescent illumination source | Lumen Dynamics; Mississauga, Ontario Canada | X-Cite 120Q |
Multi-band Fluorescence filter sets | Chroma Technology Corp.; Bellows Falls, VT | 89000 Sedat Quad – ET 89006 ECFP/EYFP/mCherry – ET |
EM-CCD camera | Andor Technology USA; South Windsor, CT | iXon3 897 |
Chamlide stage top environmental incubator | Live Cell Instruments; Seoul, South Korea | TC-L-10 |
Objective lens heater | Bioptecs; Butler, PA | 150803 Controller 150819-12-08 Heater |
Analysis software | Nikon Instruments Inc.; Melville, NY | NIS Elements |