1. Preparation of the stock solutions
NOTE: It is recommended to wear nitrile gloves, a lab coat, and safety glasses during the entire protocol.
2. Sample collection
3. Sample preparation via the modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate
NOTE: Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the modified QuEChERS method.
4. Instrumental analysis by GC-MS
5. Data acquisition
The full validation of the analytical method was performed in terms of linearity, matrix effects, recovery, and repeatability.
Matrix-matched calibration curves with spiked blank samples at six concentration levels (5 µg/kg, 10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, 100 µg/kg, 200 µg/kg, and 400 µg/kg) were used for the linearity assessment. The determination coefficients (R2) were higher than or equal to 0.99 for all the OCPs. The lowest calibration level (LCL) was set at 5 µg/kg, which meets the maximum permissible limit established at 10 µg/kg for monitoring purposes in food applications11.
The matrix effect assessment was carried out by comparing the slopes of the OCP calibration curves in pure solvent and the matrix-matched calibration curves. The matrix effect was calculated using the following equation12:
Matrix effect (%) = (slope of the matrix-matched calibration curve − slope of the pure solvent-based calibration curve)/(slope of the pure solvent-based calibration curve) × 100.
Figure 2 shows the matrix effect distributions for the OCPs studied by applying a modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate to soil samples. Positive matrix effect percentages correspond to a signal enhancement, while negative percentages mean that there is signal suppression. Specifically, (1) values ranging between −20% and 20% correspond to a soft matrix effect; (2) values ranging between −20% and -50% or between 20% and 50% correspond to a medium matrix effect; (3) and values higher than 50% or lower than −50% mean that there is a strong matrix effect. As observed, more OCPs suffered soft or medium matrix effects, while fewer OCPs suffered strong matrix effects.
The recovery and repeatability were evaluated by spiking blank samples with pesticides at three concentration levels (10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, and 200 µg/kg). Figure 3 shows the overall recovery values and relative standard deviation (RSD) values for all the pesticides and spiking levels (n = 9). As can be observed, the great majority of the OCPs studied presented average recovery percentages in the range of 70%-120%, with RSDs lower than 20%, except heptachlor, endrin, and β-endosulfan, which gave slightly higher average recoveries.
Figure 1: Representation of the modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate to extract pesticide residues from the soil sample. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Distribution of the matrix effects versus retention times (min) for the 17 OCPs. A soft matrix effect corresponds to values between −20% and 20%; a medium matrix effect corresponds to values ranging between −20% and −50% or between 20% and 50%; a strong matrix effect corresponds to values that are greater than 50% or less than −50%. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Average recoveries for the 17 OCPs after spiking 10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, and 200 µg/kg (n = 9) in the soil sample. The number of analytes within the acceptable recovery (70%-120 %) and RSD (<20 %) range are provided, along with those labeled outside of that range. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Analyte | Retention time (min) | Quantifier ion | Qualifier ion 1 | Qualifier ion 2 |
α-BHC | 11.35 | 181 | 219 | 111 |
β-BHC | 11.90 | 181 | 219 | 109 |
Lindane | 12.01 | 181 | 183 | 219 |
δ-BHC | 12.39 | 181 | 219 | 111 |
Heptachlor | 13.24 | 272 | 100 | 274 |
Aldrin | 13.94 | 263 | 66 | 265 |
Heptachlor epoxide | 14.86 | 353 | 355 | 81 |
α-Endosulfan | 15.71 | 241 | 239 | 195 |
4,4'-DDE-d8 (IS) | 16.09 | 254 | 184 | 326 |
4,4'-DDE | 16.12 | 246 | 318 | 248 |
Dieldrin | 16.18 | 79 | 263 | 81 |
Endrin | 16.57 | 263 | 317 | 345 |
β-Endosulfan | 16.73 | 195 | 241 | 159 |
4,4'-DDD | 16.89 | 235 | 237 | 165 |
Endosulfan sulfate | 17.61 | 387 | 227 | 272 |
4,4'-DDT | 17.65 | 235 | 237 | 165 |
Endrin ketone | 18.64 | 317 | 67 | 315 |
Methoxychlor | 18.86 | 227 | 228 | 212 |
Table 1: Retention times (min) and quantification parameters for the GC-MS analysis of the OCPs. Alpha-benzenehexachloride (α-BHC); beta-benzenehexachloride (β-BHC); lindane; delta-benzenehexachloride (δ-BHC); heptachlor; aldrin; heptachlor epoxide; α-endosulfan; 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene-d8 (4,4'-DDE-d8) (IS); 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (4,4'-DDE); dieldrin; endrin; β-endosulfan; 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (4,4'-DDD); endosulfan sulfate; 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (4,4'-DDT); endrin ketone; methoxychlor.
15 mL disposable glass conical centrifuge tubes | PYREX | 99502-15 | |
2 mL centrifuge tubes | Eppendorf | 30120094 | |
50 mL centrifuge tubes with screw caps | VWR | 21008-169 | |
5977B mass-selective detector | Agilent Technologies | 1617R019 | |
7820A gas chromatography system | Agilent Technologies | 16162016 | |
Acetone | Supelco | 1006582500 | |
Acetonitrile | VWR | 83642320 | |
Ammonium formate | VWR | 21254260 | |
Automatic shaker KS 3000 i control | IKA | 3940000 | |
Balance | Sartorius Lab Instruments Gmbh & Co | ENTRIS224I-1S | |
Bondesil-C18, 40 µm | Agilent Technologies | 12213012 | |
Bondesil-PSA, 40 µm | Agilent Technologies | 12213024 | |
Cyclohexane | VWR | 85385320 | |
EPA TCL pesticides mix | Sigma Aldrich | 48913 | |
Ethyl acetate | Supelco | 1036492500 | |
G4567A automatic sampler | Agilent Technologies | 19490057 | |
HP-5ms Ultra Inert (5%-phenyl)-methylpolysiloxane 30 m x 250 µm x 0.25 µm column | Agilent Technologies | 19091S-433UI | |
Magnesium sulfate monohydrate | Sigma Aldrich | 434183-1KG | |
Mega Star 3.R centrifuge | VWR | 521-1752 | |
Milli-Q gradient A10 | Millipore | RR400Q101 | |
p,p'-DDE-d8 | Dr Ehrenstorfer | DRE-XA12041100AC | |
Pipette tips 2 – 200 µL | BRAND | 732008 | |
Pipette tips 5 mL | BRAND | 702595 | |
Pipette tips 50 – 1000 uL | BRAND | 732012 | |
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 10 – 100 µL | BRAND | 704774 | |
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 100 – 1000 µL | BRAND | 704780 | |
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 20 – 200 µL | BRAND | 704778 | |
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 500 – 5000 µL | BRAND | 704782 | |
Vials with fused-in insert | Sigma Aldrich | 29398-U | |
OCPs | CAS registry number | ||
α-BHC | 319-84-6 | ||
β-BHC | 319-85-7 | ||
Lindane | 58-89-9 | ||
δ-BHC | 319-86-8 | ||
Heptachlor | 76-44-8 | ||
Aldrin | 309-00-2 | ||
Heptachlor epoxide | 1024-57-3 | ||
α-Endosulfan | 959-98-8 | ||
4,4'-DDE-d8 (IS) | 93952-19-3 | ||
4,4'-DDE | 72-55-9 | ||
Dieldrin | 60-57-1 | ||
Endrin | 72-20-8 | ||
β-Endosulfan | 33213-65-9 | ||
4,4'-DDD | 72-54-8 | ||
Endosulfan sulfate | 1031-07-8 | ||
4,4'-DDT | 50-29-3 | ||
Endrin ketone | 53494-70-5 | ||
Methoxychlor | 72-43-5 |
Currently, the QuEChERS method represents the most widely used sample preparation protocol worldwide for analyzing pesticide residues in a broad variety of matrices both in official and non-official laboratories. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate has previously proven to be advantageous compared to the original and the two official versions. On the one hand, the simple addition of 0.5 g of ammonium formate per gram of sample is sufficient to induce phase separation and achieve good analytical performance. On the other hand, ammonium formate reduces the need for maintenance in routine analyses. Here, a modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate was applied for the simultaneous analysis of organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues in agricultural soil. Specifically, 10 g of the sample was hydrated with 10 mL of water and then extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile. Next, phase separation was carried out using 5 g of ammonium formate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was subjected to a dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up step with anhydrous magnesium sulfate, primary-secondary amine, and octadecylsilane. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used as the analytical technique. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate is demonstrated as a successful alternative for extracting OCP residues from a soil sample.
Currently, the QuEChERS method represents the most widely used sample preparation protocol worldwide for analyzing pesticide residues in a broad variety of matrices both in official and non-official laboratories. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate has previously proven to be advantageous compared to the original and the two official versions. On the one hand, the simple addition of 0.5 g of ammonium formate per gram of sample is sufficient to induce phase separation and achieve good analytical performance. On the other hand, ammonium formate reduces the need for maintenance in routine analyses. Here, a modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate was applied for the simultaneous analysis of organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues in agricultural soil. Specifically, 10 g of the sample was hydrated with 10 mL of water and then extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile. Next, phase separation was carried out using 5 g of ammonium formate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was subjected to a dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up step with anhydrous magnesium sulfate, primary-secondary amine, and octadecylsilane. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used as the analytical technique. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate is demonstrated as a successful alternative for extracting OCP residues from a soil sample.
Currently, the QuEChERS method represents the most widely used sample preparation protocol worldwide for analyzing pesticide residues in a broad variety of matrices both in official and non-official laboratories. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate has previously proven to be advantageous compared to the original and the two official versions. On the one hand, the simple addition of 0.5 g of ammonium formate per gram of sample is sufficient to induce phase separation and achieve good analytical performance. On the other hand, ammonium formate reduces the need for maintenance in routine analyses. Here, a modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate was applied for the simultaneous analysis of organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues in agricultural soil. Specifically, 10 g of the sample was hydrated with 10 mL of water and then extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile. Next, phase separation was carried out using 5 g of ammonium formate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was subjected to a dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up step with anhydrous magnesium sulfate, primary-secondary amine, and octadecylsilane. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used as the analytical technique. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate is demonstrated as a successful alternative for extracting OCP residues from a soil sample.