Science Education
>

Analysis of Organochlorine Pesticides in a Soil Sample by a Modified QuEChERS Approach Using Ammonium Formate

PREPARAÇÃO DO INSTRUTOR
CONCEITOS
PROTOCOLO DO ALUNO
JoVE Journal
Química
Author Produced
É necessária uma assinatura da JoVE para visualizar este conteúdo.  Faça login ou comece sua avaliação gratuita.
JoVE Journal Química
Analysis of Organochlorine Pesticides in a Soil Sample by a Modified QuEChERS Approach Using Ammonium Formate

1. Preparation of the stock solutions

NOTE: It is recommended to wear nitrile gloves, a lab coat, and safety glasses during the entire protocol.

  1. Prepare a stock solution in acetone at 400 mg/L from a commercial mix of OCPs (see Table of Materials) at 2,000 mg/L in hexane:toluene (1:1) in a 25 mL volumetric flask. Table 1 shows each of the selected OCPs.
  2. Prepare the subsequent stock solutions in acetone at concentrations of 50 mg/L, 1 mg/L, and 0.08 mg/L in 10 mL volumetric flasks, and store them in amber glass vials at −18 °C.
    NOTE: The same solutions can be used throughout the work, but it is important to store them under these conditions just after each use.
  3. Prepare the stock solutions in acetone at concentrations of 20 mg/L and 0.4 mg/L from a commercial standard of 4,4'-DDE-d8 at 100 mg/L in acetone in 10 mL volumetric flasks, and store in amber glass vials at −18 °C. Use 4,4'-DDE-d8 as an internal standard (IS).

2. Sample collection

  1. Collect approximately 0.5 kg of the upper 10 cm layer of an agricultural soil in a glass container. The soil object of this study was collected in a traditional agricultural zone of potato crops.
    NOTE: Surface sampling with a spatula was carried out. However, the depth of the soil could influence its physicochemical characteristics. Therefore, if the organic carbon content varies with the depth, it is necessary to take samples at different depths.
  2. Take the soil sample to the laboratory, sift it with a 1 mm diameter sieve, and store it until analysis at 4 °C in an amber glass container.
    ​NOTE: The same soil sample can be used throughout the work, but it is important to store it under these conditions just after each use.

3. Sample preparation via the modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate

NOTE: Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the modified QuEChERS method.

  1. Weigh 10 g of the soil sample in a 50 mL centrifuge tube, and add 50 µL of the IS solution at 20 mg/L to yield 100 µg/kg. For recovery purposes, also add the pesticide solutions prepared in step 1.2 to yield 10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, and 200 µg/kg (n = 3 each).
  2. Shake the tube using a vortex for 30 s to better integrate the spike into the sample.
  3. Add 10 mL of water. Shake the tube using an automated shaker at 10 x g for 5 min.
  4. Add 10 mL of acetonitrile. Shake the tube again at 10 x g for 5 min.
  5. Add 5 g of ammonium formate (see Table of Materials), shake the tube vigorously for 1 min by hand, and centrifuge at 1,800 x g for 5 min.
  6. Transfer 1 mL of the acetonitrile extract to a 2 mL centrifuge tube containing 150 mg of anhydrous MgSO4, 50 mg of primary-secondary amine (PSA), and 50 mg octadecylsilane (C18) (see Table of Materials) for clean-up purposes by dispersive-solid phase extraction (d-SPE)8, vortex for 30 s, and centrifuge at 1,800 x g for 5 min.
  7. Transfer 200 µL of the extract to an appropriately labeled autosampler vial with a 300 µL fused insert, and perform an instrumental analysis using a GC-MS system (step 4).
    ​NOTE: Matrix-matched calibration is carried out following the same steps as previously using blank extracts, but 5 mL of the supernatant is cleaned in 15 mL tubes in the d-SPE step (step 3.6) and the spike and IS solutions are not added until step 3.7. Add the calibration standard solutions in the autosampler vials to yield 5 µg/kg, 10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, 100 µg/kg, 200 µg/kg, and 400 µg/kg, evaporate to dryness, and add 200 µL of the matrix extracts.

4. Instrumental analysis by GC-MS

  1. Perform the GC-MS analyses using a GC-MS system with a single quadrupole mass spectrometer and an electron ionization interface (−70 eV) (see Table of Materials).
  2. Set the MS transfer line at 280 °C and the ion source at 230 °C.
  3. Use a 5%-phenyl-methylpolysiloxane 30 m x 250 µm x 0.25 µm column (see Table of Materials) and ultrahigh purity He as the carrier gas at a 1.2 mL/min constant flow rate.
  4. Maintain the GC oven at 60 °C initially for 2 min, then ramp up the temperature to 160 °C at 25 °C/min, and hold for 1 min. Then, increase the temperature to 175 °C at 15 °C/min, and hold for 3 min. Then, increase to 220 °C at 40 °C/min, and hold for 3 min. Again, increase to 250 °C at 30 °C/min, and hold for 2 min. Finally, take the temperature to 310 °C at 30 °C/min, and hold for 2 min. The total analysis time is 22.125 min.
  5. Conduct a full autotune and an air and water check of the MS before each sequence.
    1. Open the MassHunter acquisition software that controls all the parameters of the GC-MS system.
      NOTE: The instrument system includes the MassHunter acquisition software by default.
    2. Open the "View" option on the toolbar, and click on Vacuum control, click on Tune, and click on Autotune. The autotune will end after a few minutes.
    3. Open the "View" option, and click on Instrument control.
    4. Click on Yes, and save the new tune file for the autotune.
    5. Open the "View" option on the toolbar, and click on Vacuum control, click on Tune again, and click on Air & Water check. The air and water check will end after a few seconds.
    6. Open the "View" option, and click on Instrument control.
    7. Click on Yes, and save the new tune file for the air and water check.
  6. Perform the injection using an autosampler (see Table of Materials) at 280 °C in the splitless mode, keeping the injection volume 1.5 µL. After 0.75 min of the injection, open the split at a 40 mL/min flow rate.
    NOTE: Between injections, the 10 µL syringe must be washed three times with ethyl acetate and three times with cyclohexane. All the injections are in duplicate.
  7. Analyze the analytes in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. This is the standard mode used in MS systems with a single quadrupole.
    ​NOTE: Table 1 shows the retention times (min) and the quantification parameters based on using one quantitation and two identification ions for the OCPs and the IS. The quantitative analysis is based on the ratio of the peak area of the quantitation ion to the ion of IS.

5. Data acquisition

  1. Open the MassHunter acquisition software that controls all the parameters of the GC-MS system.
  2. Open the "Sequence" option on the toolbar, and edit the sequence, including the sample name, the vial number, the number of injections, the instrumental method, and the name of the file to be generated. Add as many rows as necessary.
  3. Click on OK, and save the new sequence.
  4. Open the "Sequence" option on the toolbar again, and click on Run Sequence in the dropdown menu. A new window will open to confirm the injection method and the folder where the samples will be saved. Click on Run Sequence again, and the injection will begin.

Analysis of Organochlorine Pesticides in a Soil Sample by a Modified QuEChERS Approach Using Ammonium Formate

Learning Objectives

The full validation of the analytical method was performed in terms of linearity, matrix effects, recovery, and repeatability.

Matrix-matched calibration curves with spiked blank samples at six concentration levels (5 µg/kg, 10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, 100 µg/kg, 200 µg/kg, and 400 µg/kg) were used for the linearity assessment. The determination coefficients (R2) were higher than or equal to 0.99 for all the OCPs. The lowest calibration level (LCL) was set at 5 µg/kg, which meets the maximum permissible limit established at 10 µg/kg for monitoring purposes in food applications11.

The matrix effect assessment was carried out by comparing the slopes of the OCP calibration curves in pure solvent and the matrix-matched calibration curves. The matrix effect was calculated using the following equation12:

Matrix effect (%) = (slope of the matrix-matched calibration curve − slope of the pure solvent-based calibration curve)/(slope of the pure solvent-based calibration curve) × 100.

Figure 2 shows the matrix effect distributions for the OCPs studied by applying a modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate to soil samples. Positive matrix effect percentages correspond to a signal enhancement, while negative percentages mean that there is signal suppression. Specifically, (1) values ranging between −20% and 20% correspond to a soft matrix effect; (2) values ranging between −20% and -50% or between 20% and 50% correspond to a medium matrix effect; (3) and values higher than 50% or lower than −50% mean that there is a strong matrix effect. As observed, more OCPs suffered soft or medium matrix effects, while fewer OCPs suffered strong matrix effects.

The recovery and repeatability were evaluated by spiking blank samples with pesticides at three concentration levels (10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, and 200 µg/kg). Figure 3 shows the overall recovery values and relative standard deviation (RSD) values for all the pesticides and spiking levels (n = 9). As can be observed, the great majority of the OCPs studied presented average recovery percentages in the range of 70%-120%, with RSDs lower than 20%, except heptachlor, endrin, and β-endosulfan, which gave slightly higher average recoveries.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Representation of the modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate to extract pesticide residues from the soil sample. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Distribution of the matrix effects versus retention times (min) for the 17 OCPs. A soft matrix effect corresponds to values between −20% and 20%; a medium matrix effect corresponds to values ranging between −20% and −50% or between 20% and 50%; a strong matrix effect corresponds to values that are greater than 50% or less than −50%. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Average recoveries for the 17 OCPs after spiking 10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, and 200 µg/kg (n = 9) in the soil sample. The number of analytes within the acceptable recovery (70%-120 %) and RSD (<20 %) range are provided, along with those labeled outside of that range. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Analyte Retention time (min) Quantifier ion Qualifier ion 1 Qualifier ion 2
α-BHC 11.35 181 219 111
β-BHC 11.90 181 219 109
Lindane 12.01 181 183 219
δ-BHC 12.39 181 219 111
Heptachlor 13.24 272 100 274
Aldrin 13.94 263 66 265
Heptachlor epoxide 14.86 353 355 81
α-Endosulfan 15.71 241 239 195
4,4'-DDE-d8 (IS) 16.09 254 184 326
4,4'-DDE 16.12 246 318 248
Dieldrin 16.18 79 263 81
Endrin 16.57 263 317 345
β-Endosulfan 16.73 195 241 159
4,4'-DDD 16.89 235 237 165
Endosulfan sulfate 17.61 387 227 272
4,4'-DDT 17.65 235 237 165
Endrin ketone 18.64 317 67 315
Methoxychlor 18.86 227 228 212

Table 1: Retention times (min) and quantification parameters for the GC-MS analysis of the OCPs. Alpha-benzenehexachloride (α-BHC); beta-benzenehexachloride (β-BHC); lindane; delta-benzenehexachloride (δ-BHC); heptachlor; aldrin; heptachlor epoxide; α-endosulfan; 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene-d8 (4,4'-DDE-d8) (IS); 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (4,4'-DDE); dieldrin; endrin; β-endosulfan; 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (4,4'-DDD); endosulfan sulfate; 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (4,4'-DDT); endrin ketone; methoxychlor.

List of Materials

15 mL disposable glass conical centrifuge tubes PYREX 99502-15
2 mL centrifuge tubes Eppendorf 30120094
50 mL centrifuge tubes with screw caps VWR 21008-169
5977B mass-selective detector Agilent Technologies 1617R019
7820A gas chromatography system Agilent Technologies 16162016
Acetone Supelco 1006582500
Acetonitrile VWR 83642320
Ammonium formate VWR 21254260
Automatic shaker KS 3000 i control IKA 3940000
Balance Sartorius Lab Instruments Gmbh & Co ENTRIS224I-1S
Bondesil-C18, 40 µm Agilent Technologies 12213012
Bondesil-PSA, 40 µm Agilent Technologies 12213024
Cyclohexane VWR 85385320
EPA TCL pesticides mix Sigma Aldrich 48913
Ethyl acetate Supelco 1036492500
G4567A automatic sampler Agilent Technologies 19490057
HP-5ms Ultra Inert (5%-phenyl)-methylpolysiloxane 30 m x 250 µm x 0.25 µm column Agilent Technologies 19091S-433UI
Magnesium sulfate monohydrate Sigma Aldrich 434183-1KG
Mega Star 3.R centrifuge VWR 521-1752
Milli-Q gradient A10 Millipore RR400Q101
p,p'-DDE-d8 Dr Ehrenstorfer DRE-XA12041100AC
Pipette tips 2 – 200 µL BRAND 732008
Pipette tips 5 mL BRAND 702595
Pipette tips 50 – 1000 uL BRAND 732012
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 10 – 100 µL BRAND 704774
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 100 – 1000 µL BRAND 704780
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 20 – 200 µL BRAND 704778
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 500 – 5000 µL BRAND 704782
Vials with fused-in insert Sigma Aldrich 29398-U
OCPs CAS registry number
α-BHC 319-84-6
β-BHC 319-85-7
Lindane 58-89-9
δ-BHC 319-86-8
Heptachlor 76-44-8
Aldrin 309-00-2
Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3
α-Endosulfan 959-98-8
4,4'-DDE-d8 (IS) 93952-19-3
4,4'-DDE 72-55-9
Dieldrin 60-57-1
Endrin 72-20-8
β-Endosulfan 33213-65-9
4,4'-DDD 72-54-8
Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8
4,4'-DDT 50-29-3
Endrin ketone 53494-70-5
Methoxychlor 72-43-5

Preparação do Laboratório

Currently, the QuEChERS method represents the most widely used sample preparation protocol worldwide for analyzing pesticide residues in a broad variety of matrices both in official and non-official laboratories. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate has previously proven to be advantageous compared to the original and the two official versions. On the one hand, the simple addition of 0.5 g of ammonium formate per gram of sample is sufficient to induce phase separation and achieve good analytical performance. On the other hand, ammonium formate reduces the need for maintenance in routine analyses. Here, a modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate was applied for the simultaneous analysis of organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues in agricultural soil. Specifically, 10 g of the sample was hydrated with 10 mL of water and then extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile. Next, phase separation was carried out using 5 g of ammonium formate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was subjected to a dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up step with anhydrous magnesium sulfate, primary-secondary amine, and octadecylsilane. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used as the analytical technique. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate is demonstrated as a successful alternative for extracting OCP residues from a soil sample.

Currently, the QuEChERS method represents the most widely used sample preparation protocol worldwide for analyzing pesticide residues in a broad variety of matrices both in official and non-official laboratories. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate has previously proven to be advantageous compared to the original and the two official versions. On the one hand, the simple addition of 0.5 g of ammonium formate per gram of sample is sufficient to induce phase separation and achieve good analytical performance. On the other hand, ammonium formate reduces the need for maintenance in routine analyses. Here, a modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate was applied for the simultaneous analysis of organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues in agricultural soil. Specifically, 10 g of the sample was hydrated with 10 mL of water and then extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile. Next, phase separation was carried out using 5 g of ammonium formate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was subjected to a dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up step with anhydrous magnesium sulfate, primary-secondary amine, and octadecylsilane. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used as the analytical technique. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate is demonstrated as a successful alternative for extracting OCP residues from a soil sample.

Procedimento

Currently, the QuEChERS method represents the most widely used sample preparation protocol worldwide for analyzing pesticide residues in a broad variety of matrices both in official and non-official laboratories. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate has previously proven to be advantageous compared to the original and the two official versions. On the one hand, the simple addition of 0.5 g of ammonium formate per gram of sample is sufficient to induce phase separation and achieve good analytical performance. On the other hand, ammonium formate reduces the need for maintenance in routine analyses. Here, a modified QuEChERS method using ammonium formate was applied for the simultaneous analysis of organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues in agricultural soil. Specifically, 10 g of the sample was hydrated with 10 mL of water and then extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile. Next, phase separation was carried out using 5 g of ammonium formate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was subjected to a dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up step with anhydrous magnesium sulfate, primary-secondary amine, and octadecylsilane. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used as the analytical technique. The QuEChERS method using ammonium formate is demonstrated as a successful alternative for extracting OCP residues from a soil sample.

Tags