The protocol follows guidelines of the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw. The patient gave informed consent to the procedure and acknowledged the fact that it will be recorded. The patient agreed to that prior to the procedure.
NOTE: The basic criterion for including the patient in the surgery project was the necessity to intervene because of the anatomical dysfunction, which made it impossible to use a standard implant. Mixed reality was aimed at better placement of the prosthesis, increasing the chances of successful surgery.
1. Preparation
2. Pre-surgery checkups
3. Mixed reality model
NOTE: The process is performed to achieve proper implant and pelvis visualization, which will be used intraoperatively.
4. Surgery
5. Postoperative care
Image preprocessing
Binary masks of the pelvic bone, femur, and endoprosthesis were semi-automatically segmented from CT DICOM images by experienced radiologic technologists using thresholding and region growing algorithms with available software33. The prepared label maps were also manually corrected by a radiologist. Label maps were used to enhance the visualization by adding them to the CT scan in the next step. This approach made it possible to merge the volumetric rendering, which allows to see the bone structure and surrounding tissues on the CT scans, with the segmented parts indicating important tissues. The segmentation results were concluded in the original stack, which avoided constructing only a 3D graphical model of structures but made it possible to maintain information about all Hounsfield Units (HU) values. It resulted in an interactive visualization that allowed one to display tissues, implant and conduct bone segmentations simultaneously or one at a time, depending on the surgical situation (Figure 1 and Figure 4) visualizations of the fixed implant. The processed CT data set was visualized as holograms using dedicated software.
Pre-procedural planning and hospitalization
On the basis of computer tomography data and visualizations, an operation plan was prepared. The plan included important values: hip center of rotation, acetabular inclination, anteversion, and the direction, method and zones of implant mounting. The position of the implant was determined by bone and anatomical points, while the appropriate configuration was additionally confirmed after setting the trial head of the prosthesis and clinical checking of the implant's stability during the procedure. Post-operative CT was performed in order to confirm the correct position of the implant. The position of the screws was planned on the basis of the CT by the engineer and surgeon, which allowed to avoid contact of the screws with the vascular-nerve structures and their damage (Figure 5). The acetabular defect was classified as 3B Paprosky classification34. Type 3B is the most severe destruction of all acetabular structures, including walls and columns34. The clinical HHS score before surgery was 44 (Table 1).
Activities to prepare the patient for the procedure included internal medicine consultation and standard laboratory tests. Essential examinations were also necessary: ECG and X-ray: chest X-ray, pelvic X-ray. The control image was also taken after surgery. The patient received standard thromboprophylaxis (Clexane 40 mg, 1 x 1 s.c.) and antibiotic prophylaxis (Tarsime 3 x 1.5 g i.v.) during hospitalization. Individualized pain therapy was included. All other medications were taken according to the patient's standard recommendations.
In January 2019, an arthroplasty revision of the left hip was performed, which included the replacement of a loose acetabular component with the custom-made implant: Triflanged acetabular component, Polyethylene insert, constrained, Fastening screws-10 pieces, Co-Cr-Mo constrained modular head (36 mm), and a 9 mm neck.
The operation lasted for 4 h and was executed without complications. Verticalization with the help of a walker took place on the second day after the procedure. The patient was discharged on day 14 in a good general condition (long rehabilitation time due to foot paralysis after cerebral palsy). Control visits took place following the appointed dates. Radiological control-CTs and X-rays were performed before the surgery (Figure 3, Figure 6, and Figure 7), after the surgery (Figure 2 and Figure 8) and after 2 years (Figure 9). Implant placement was performed in accordance with the assumptions of the project. The offset, range of motion, and length of the limbs were restored. The function and patient's quality of life were relatively good on the subsequent visit and improved significantly since the initial diagnosis. Before the operation, the patient moved to a wheelchair because of pain-the patient's subjective assessment on the 10-point visual analog pain-intensity scale was 8 (VAS 8). After surgery, during rehabilitation, she stopped using two orthopedic crutches. The patient currently walks with one crutch due to foot drop-peroneal nerve palsy after previous surgery in another hospital. According to the authors' knowledge, it was the first such procedure in Poland and one of the first in the world. It was a medical student research team that proposed the idea of using modern technology in the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Musculoskeletal System.
Anatomical structures that require surgical intervention must be visible for adequate implant fixation as planned. In the case of non-standard patients with significant bone defects and deformation, the appropriate visualization and adjustment of a custom-made prosthesis are of fundamental importance for the treatment process. Proper implant fixation reduces the risk of postoperative complications such as loosening or instability. The technology of mixed reality allows without risk and in a non-invasive way to accurately visualize the pelvis, bones, and soft tissues, increasing the chances of good implant placement and even possibly shortening the time of surgery in the future. The ability to manipulate the image, for example, zooming in the selected fragments of the complex anatomical structures, allows excluding the imperfections of the surgeon's eye (Figure 10 and Figure 11). In summary, a precise, fully personalized complex revision arthroplasty was performed. The authors see opportunities for the further development of mixed reality in orthopedics, not only in arthroplasty and traumatology, but also in orthopedic oncology, where it is often necessary to perform very extensive resections with a high level of precision. The appropriate visualization of difficult-to-access anatomical areas with surrounding neurovascular structures can make surgery easier for the surgeon and safer for the patient.
Figure 1: Visualization of the fixed implant. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: X-ray one day after the surgery. The letter 'L' represents the left side of the body on the X-ray. In this case, a photo of the left hip. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: X-ray before the surgery. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Visualization of the fixed implant. Visualization is prepared in the process of preoperative planning. It shows the potential fixation of the implant. The blue color in the visualization is the border of the implant. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: 3D project for insertion of implant fixing screws. Colors are used by engineers for better and more accurate visualization. This makes it easy to distinguish bolts having different parameters-length, cross-section. The mounting sequence can also be taken into account. The colors are illustrative and are used in the pre-operative planning process. In the process of planning the implant mounting, it is important to exclude intraoperative damage to blood vessels and nerves. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: CT-3D reconstruction before the surgery shows the hip joints and part of the femur. Visible degeneration and destruction of bone structures, pelvic asymmetry. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: CT-3D reconstruction before the surgery. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: X-ray 6 weeks after the surgery. The implant was fitted correctly, it did not come loose. Visible left hip endoprosthesis with fixing elements. X-ray in combination with the clinical examination of the patient confirms the success of the operation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9: X-ray 2 years after the surgery. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 10: Mixed reality user's point of view – pelvis from the front. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 11: Mixed reality user's point of view – pelvis from the side. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 12: Mixed reality user's point of view – the photo taken during the surgery – the hologram shows a part of the pelvis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 13: The photo taken during the surgery – main operator, Prof. Łęgosz uses mixed reality technology. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
HSS SCORE | |||
BEFORE SURGERY | 6 WEEKS AFTER SURGERY | 6 MONTH AFTER SURGERY | 12 MONTH AFTER SURGERY |
44 | 74,5 | 80 | 82 |
Table 1: HHS Score table – presenting the patient's results according to the Harris Hip score before the procedure, 6 weeks after the procedure, 6 months after the procedure, 12 months after the procedure.
CarnaLifeHolo v. 1.5.2 | MedApp S.A. | ||
Custom-Made implant type Triflanged Acetabular Component | BIOMET | REF PM0001779 | |
Head Constrained Modular Head + 9mm Neck for cone 12/14, Co-Cr-Mo, size 36mm | BIOMET | REF 14-107021 | |
Polyethylene insert Freedom Ringloc-X Costrained Linear Ringloc-X 58mm for head 36mm / 10 * | BIOMET | REF 11-263658 |
The technology of 3D printing and visualization of anatomical structures is rapidly growing in various fields of medicine. A custom-made implant and mixed reality were used to perform complex revision hip arthroplasty in January 2019. The use of mixed reality allowed for a very good visualization of the structures and resulted in precise implant fixation. According to the authors’ knowledge, this is the first described case report of the combined use of these two innovations. The diagnosis preceding the qualification for the procedure was the loosening of the left hip’s acetabular component. Mixed reality headset and holograms prepared by engineers were used during the surgery. The operation was successful, and it was followed by early verticalization and patient rehabilitation. The team sees opportunities for technology development in joint arthroplasty, trauma, and orthopedic oncology.
The technology of 3D printing and visualization of anatomical structures is rapidly growing in various fields of medicine. A custom-made implant and mixed reality were used to perform complex revision hip arthroplasty in January 2019. The use of mixed reality allowed for a very good visualization of the structures and resulted in precise implant fixation. According to the authors’ knowledge, this is the first described case report of the combined use of these two innovations. The diagnosis preceding the qualification for the procedure was the loosening of the left hip’s acetabular component. Mixed reality headset and holograms prepared by engineers were used during the surgery. The operation was successful, and it was followed by early verticalization and patient rehabilitation. The team sees opportunities for technology development in joint arthroplasty, trauma, and orthopedic oncology.
The technology of 3D printing and visualization of anatomical structures is rapidly growing in various fields of medicine. A custom-made implant and mixed reality were used to perform complex revision hip arthroplasty in January 2019. The use of mixed reality allowed for a very good visualization of the structures and resulted in precise implant fixation. According to the authors’ knowledge, this is the first described case report of the combined use of these two innovations. The diagnosis preceding the qualification for the procedure was the loosening of the left hip’s acetabular component. Mixed reality headset and holograms prepared by engineers were used during the surgery. The operation was successful, and it was followed by early verticalization and patient rehabilitation. The team sees opportunities for technology development in joint arthroplasty, trauma, and orthopedic oncology.