This protocol describes methods used to prepare rat vocal folds for histochemical neuromuscular study.
The purpose of this tutorial is to describe the preparation of the rat vocal fold for histochemical neuromuscular study. This protocol outlines procedures for rat laryngeal dissection, flash-freezing, and cryosectioning of the vocal folds. This study describes how to cryosection vocal folds in both longitudinal and cross-sectional planes. A novelty of this protocol is the laryngeal tracking during cryosectioning that ensures accurate identification of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles and reduces the chance of tissue loss. Figures demonstrate the progressive cryosectioning in both planes. Twenty-nine rat hemi-larynges were cryosectioned and tracked from the emergence of the thyroid cartilage to the appearance of the first section that included the full vocal fold. The full vocal fold was visualized for all animals in both planes. There was high variability in the distance from the appearance of the thyroid cartilage to the appearance of the full vocal fold in both planes. Weight was not correlated to depth of laryngeal landmarks, suggesting individual variability and other factors related to tissue preparation may be responsible for the high variability in the appearance of landmarks during sectioning. This study details a methodology and presents morphological data for preparing the rat vocal fold for histochemical neuromuscular investigation. Due to high individual variability, laryngeal landmarks should be closely tracked during cryosectioning to prevent oversectioning tissue and tissue loss. The use of a consistent methodology, including adequate tissue preparation and awareness of landmarks within the rat larynx, will assist with consistent results across studies and aid new researchers interested in using the rat vocal fold as a model to investigate laryngeal neuromuscular mechanisms.
The rat larynx is a well-established model to investigate structural and functional neuromuscular laryngeal adaptations to development, aging, disease, and pharmacological agents1,2,3,4,5. Consistency of histological methods is critical to this line of work, as there are multiple intricacies involved in muscle preparation and analysis as well as challenges associated with laryngeal size, shape, and topography of the muscles encapsulated within the laryngeal cartilages1,6,7,8,9,10,11. Due to the small size of the rat intrinsic laryngeal muscles, systematic embedding, freezing, and cryosectioning are critical to achieve consistent and accurate results. For example, when sectioning the rat vocal fold in the coronal plane, the neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) of four of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles are located within less than 1.8 mm of tissue depth11. Therefore, precise monitoring of laryngeal muscle anatomy during cryosectioning is imperative to accurately identify the section(s) of interest and prevent oversectioning of tissue. Oversectioning of the target muscle can result in inaccurate identification of number and topography of NMJs11 or can result in overall reductions in sample size if the target muscle is discarded due to landmark orientation confusion12. As novel models for the study of laryngeal muscle and their respective adaptations are developed, standard operating procedures are essential to ensure results are precise, reliable, and reproducible across studies.
The objective of this article is to detail preparation of the rat vocal fold for optimal longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis. Detailed methods used regularly in our laboratory are described to identify target muscle landmarks during cryosectioning. Although similar methods are used in several laboratories, greater detail is provided here than in the literature to ensure reliable and accurate replication when implemented by novice investigators. The goal of this tutorial is to provide a standard methodology for immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of the rat vocal fold to improve consistency across laboratories and investigations.
This study was performed in compliance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of New York University School of Medicine.
1. Dissect rat larynx
2. Fix and/or flash-freeze laryngeal tissue
NOTE: Fixation may not be ideal for all immunostaining protocols. Often laryngeal tissues are flash-frozen fresh immediately following dissection. Skip step 2.1 to flash-freeze laryngeal tissue without fixation.
3. Cryosection hemilarynx in cross-sectional plane
4. Cryosection hemilarynx in longitudinal plane
The representative results were part of an ongoing investigation of the effects of vocal exercise on the laryngeal neuromuscular system. Twenty-nine male Fischer 344/brown Norway rats (12 9-month-old, 17 24-month-old) were weighed and euthanized with CO2 inhalation followed by a bilateral thoracotomy.
The procedures followed the outlined protocol to label NMJs and fiber size of the lateral and medial TA muscles. The distance between laryngeal landmarks was tracked in both longitudinal and cross-sectional planes using laryngeal muscles and surrounding cartilages to determine progression during cryosectioning (Table 1). Tracking commenced at the first appearance of the thyroid cartilage in both directional planes. Figure 2 illustrates the appearance of laryngeal landmarks during cross-sectional cryosectioning in temporal order with the thyroid (Figure 2a,b) appearing prior to the medial TA muscle and to the lamina propria (Figure 2c,d). Figure 3 illustrates the appearance of laryngeal landmarks during longitudinal cryosectioning in temporal order with the alar muscle (Figure 3a,b) appearing prior to the medial TA muscle (Figure 3c,d) and to the lamina propria (Figure 3e,f).
In both directional planes, distances among landmarks greatly varied for individual animals.
Weight and laryngeal landmark appearances had weak to moderate correlations for young rats and weak correlations for aged rats (Table 2 and Table 3). Distances among landmarks within each plane were moderately to strongly correlated for both age groups, but weakly correlated between the two dissection planes. Therefore, variability in landmark appearance could not be accounted for by weight or individual variations in laryngeal size.
Figure 1: A rat larynx dorsally bisected between the arytenoid cartilages (ArC).
The right side of the hemi-larynx is annotated with landmarks in the longitudinal plane (LZ1-LZ5) corresponding to the five longitudinal landmarks in Table 1. The left side of the hemi-larynx is annotated with landmarks in the cross-sectional plane (CZ1 and CZ2) that correspond to the beginning of the lateral TA muscle and full cross-section of the vocal fold respectively. VF = vocal fold, CrC = cricoid cartilage, AlC = alar cartilage, and T1 = first tracheal ring. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Two cross-sections imaged at 10x magnification in brightfield (right) and in the fluorescent 488 channel (left) following immunostaining for laminin to outline muscle fibers.
The sections (from top to bottom) show the progression during cryosectioning in temporal order with the thyroid (a,b) appearing prior to the medial TA muscle and to the lamina propria of the vocal fold (c,d). ThC = thyroid cartilage, LTA = lateral thyroarytenoid, and MTA = medial thyroarytenoid. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Three longitudinal sections imaged at 10x magnification in brightfield (right) and in the fluorescent 488 channel (left) following immunostaining for neuromuscular junctions.
The sections (from top to bottom) show the progression during cryosectioning in temporal order with the alar muscle (a,b) appearing prior to the medial TA muscle (c,d) and to the lamina propria (e,f) of the vocal fold. AlC = alar cartilage, ThC = thyroid cartilage, ArC = arytenoid cartilage, LTA = lateral thyroarytenoid, MTA = medial thyroarytenoid, and SCA = superior cricoarytenoid. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Longitudinal landmarks | Mean (standard deviation) in μm | Range in μm | |
1. All three major cartilages (thyroid, alar, arytenoid) appeared with emergence of muscle fibers | 1,591 (665) | 350–2,800 | |
2. Superior cricoarytenoid (SCA), alar cricoarytenoid (ACA), and lateral thyroarytenoid (LTA) muscles appeared | 2,344 (591) | 91–3,500 | |
3. ACA and LTA muscles extended completely without fragmentation | 2,631 (532) | 1505–3,640 | |
4. Arytenoid cartilage enlarged, ACA disappeared, medial thyroarytenoid (MTA) muscle emerged | 2,948 (606) | 1765–4,305 | |
5. Target full vocal fold section: LTA and MTA muscles extended completely without fragmentation and lamina propria emerged | 3,131 (542) | 2205–4410 | |
Cross-sectional landmarks | |||
1. LTA muscle appeared | 303 (138) | 110–690 | |
2. MTA muscle appeared and was ~50% of the LTA size with clear lamina propria and epithelium noted. | 482 (167) | 210–850 |
Table 1: Distances in µm from the first appearance of the thyroid cartilage to each laryngeal landmark during cryosectioning (n = 29).
CSA | Longitudinal | |||||||
LTA | MTA | Cartilages | Alar/SCA | LTA | MTA | LP | ||
CSA | LTA | 1 | ||||||
MTA | 0.88 | 1 | ||||||
Longitudinal | Cartilages | 0.42 | 0.42 | 1 | ||||
Alar/SCA | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.77 | 1 | ||||
LTA | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.71 | 0.98 | 1 | |||
MTA | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.72 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 1 | ||
LP | 0.53 | 0.41 | 0.76 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1 | |
Weight | -0.55 | -0.35 | 0.08 | -0.45 | -0.46 | -0.46 | -0.41 |
Table 2: Results of Pearson correlation between weight and the depth of laryngeal landmarks in the cross-sectional (CSA) and longitudinal planes for young male rats. LTA = lateral thyroarytenoid, MTA = medial thyroarytenoid, SCA = superior cricoarytenoid, and LP = lamina propria.
CSA | Longitudinal | |||||||
LTA | MTA | Cartilages | Alar/SCA | LTA | MTA | LP | ||
CSA | LTA | 1 | ||||||
MTA | 0.9 | 1 | ||||||
Longitudinal | Cartilages | 0.21 | 0.33 | 1 | ||||
Alar/SCA | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.73 | 1 | ||||
LTA | -0.06 | -0.04 | 0.64 | 0.96 | 1 | |||
MTA | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0.6 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 1 | ||
LP | -0.17 | -0.15 | 0.52 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 1 | |
Weight | 0.23 | 0.13 | -0.24 | -0.07 | -0.15 | -0.15 | -0.3 |
Table 3: Results of Pearson correlation between weight and the depth of laryngeal landmarks in the cross-sectional (CSA) and longitudinal planes for old male rats. LTA = lateral thyroarytenoid, MTA = medial thyroarytenoid, SCA = superior cricoarytenoid, and LP = lamina propria.
Preparing rat vocal folds for neuromuscular analysis can present with various challenges. Not only are laryngeal muscles small and surrounded by cartilage, thereby making it difficult to directly extract target muscle, high variability was also found between animals in the depth of laryngeal anatomical landmarks. For muscle the cross-section plane protocol, complete vocal fold sections appeared between 21−85 sections (10 µm per section) after the initial appearance of the ventral thyroid cartilage, which is quite a bit fewer than the 63−126 sections (35 µm per section) in the longitudinal plane for NMJ analysis protocols (Table 1).
Variability was noted in distances between laryngeal landmarks despite the uniform embedding, orienting, and sectioning of tissues for each type of protocol. Furthermore, differences in body weight did not account for variability in the wide ranges of tissue depth from one set of laryngeal landmarks to the next. This variability in distance between laryngeal landmarks may be due to individual differences in laryngeal anatomy across animals, small differences in orientation of larynges in the cryomold within the OCT compound at the time of dissection, or how the specimens were placed on the specimen disk within the cryostat when sectioning (i.e., the amount of OCT compound placed on the specimen disk prior to mounting or slight differences in angle of placement).
With an understanding that these slight differences in specimen preparation can lead to substantial variability in depth of laryngeal tissue landmarks, it is critical that novice investigators have a reference map from which to work. Outlined study protocols defining methods to identify the muscle(s) of interest and prevent protocol pitfalls—such as the ones outlined in this document—can improve reproducibility and prevent unwanted tissue loss.
Although this study focused on the TA muscle, this methodology is applicable for other intrinsic laryngeal muscles as well. For example, sectioning in the longitudinal vocal fold plane yields longitudinal muscle fiber sections of the alar, lateral TA, medial TA, lateral cricoarytenoid, and superior cricoarytenoid muscles, and cross-sections of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscles. Sectioning in the cross-sectional vocal fold plane yields cross-sections of the alar, lateral TA, medial TA, lateral cricoarytenoid, superior cricoarytenoid, and cricothyroid muscles, as well as longitudinal sections of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscles. Additionally, although this study did not include female rats, differences between male and female rats in laryngeal landmark appearance are not expected because sexual dimorphism within the rat larynx is muscle specific and not related to laryngeal framework anatomy16,18.
The variability in distance between laryngeal landmarks can make cryosectioning the rat vocal fold difficult for novice investigators. This study demonstrated that despite consistency in how the rat larynges were frozen, embedded, and cryosectioned, the distance between laryngeal landmarks varied greatly; animal weight did not account for this variability. This study provides detailed procedures with associated images on how to appropriately prepare laryngeal muscle tissue and identify laryngeal landmarks for neuromuscular histological investigation of the rat vocal fold.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This research was supported by grants F31DC017053-01A1 (Lenell, PI) and K23DC014517 (Johnson, PI) from the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health.
2-Methylbutane Certified | Fisher Chemical | 35514 | |
Aluminum Foil | Fisherbrand | 1213101 | |
Cryo Tongs SS | Thermo Scientific | 11679123 | |
Cryostat | Leica Biosystems | CM3050 | |
Cryostat blades | C.L. Sturkey D554X50 | 22-210-045 | |
Disposable Base Molds 15mm x 15mm | Thermo Scientific | 41-741 | |
Disposable Underpads | Medline | 23-666-062 | |
Dissection kit | Thermo Scientific | 9996969 | |
DPBS – Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline | Gibco | 14190136 | |
Frozen Section Medium | Fisher Healthcare | 23-730-571 | |
Ice Bucket | Bel-Art | 11999054 | |
Immunostain Moisture Chamber | Ted Pella Inc | NC9425474 | |
Needle holders | Assi | ASSI.B148 | |
Non-Woven Sponges, 4 Ply | Quick Medical | 9023 | |
Orbital shaker | Troemner | 02-217-987 | |
Pap pen | |||
Paraformaldehyde, 16% w/v aq. soln., methanol free | Alfa Aesar | 50-00-0 | |
Premium Microcentrifuge Tubes | Fisherbrand | 5408129 | |
Specimen Storage Bags | Fisherbrand | 19240093 | |
Stainless Steel Graduated Measure 32 oz/100 mL | Polar Ware | 114231B | |
Superfrost Plus Microscope Slides | Fisherbrand | 12-550-15 | |
Task wiper | Kimberly-Clark Professional™ 34155 | 06666A | |
Timer | Fisherbrand | 2261840 | |
Vannas Pattern Scissors | Assi | ASSI.SAS15RV | |
NOTE: For all supplies, these are examples of equipment to purchase. The exact model is not necessary to complete our methods. |