Live Imaging and Analysis of Muscle Contractions in <em>Drosophila</em> Embryo

Ishita Chandel; Ryan Baker; Naosuke Nakamura; Vlad Panin

doi:10.3791/59404

JoVE Journal > Developmental Biology

Biologia do Desenvolvimento

Live Imaging and Analysis of Muscle Contractions in Drosophila Embryo

Published: July 09, 2019

doi:

10.3791/59404

Ishita Chandel¹, Ryan Baker¹, Naosuke Nakamura¹, Vlad Panin¹

¹Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics,Texas A&M University

Summary

Here, we present a method to record embryonic muscle contractions in Drosophila embryos in a non-invasive and detail-oriented manner.

Abstract

Coordinated muscle contractions are a form of rhythmic behavior seen early during development in Drosophila embryos. Neuronal sensory feedback circuits are required to control this behavior. Failure to produce the rhythmic pattern of contractions can be indicative of neurological abnormalities. We previously found that defects in protein O-mannosylation, a posttranslational protein modification, affect the axon morphology of sensory neurons and result in abnormal coordinated muscle contractions in embryos. Here, we present a relatively simple method for recording and analyzing the pattern of peristaltic muscle contractions by live imaging of late stage embryos up to the point of hatching, which we used to characterize the muscle contraction phenotype of protein O-mannosyltransferase mutants. Data obtained from these recordings can be used to analyze muscle contraction waves, including frequency, direction of propagation and relative amplitude of muscle contractions at different body segments. We have also examined body posture and taken advantage of a fluorescent marker expressed specifically in muscles to accurately determine the position of the embryo midline. A similar approach can also be utilized to study various other behaviors during development, such as embryo rolling and hatching.

Introduction

Peristaltic muscle contraction is a rhythmic motor behavior similar to walking and swimming in humans¹^,²^,³. Embryonic muscle contractions seen in Drosophila late stage embryos represent an example of such a behavior. Drosophila is an excellent model organism to study various developmental processes because embryonic development in Drosophila is well characterized, relatively short, and easy to monitor. The overall goal of our method is to carefully record and analyze the wavelike pattern of contraction and relaxation of embryonic muscles. We used a simple, non-invasive approach that offers a detailed visualization, recording and analysis of muscle contractions. This method can also be potentially used to study other in vivo processes, such as embryonic rolling seen in late stage embryos just prior to hatching. In previous studies, embryonic muscle contractions were mostly analyzed in terms of frequency and direction¹^,². In order to estimate the relative extent of contractions as they progress along the body axis in the anterior or posterior direction, we have used embryos expressing GFP specifically in muscles. This analysis provides a more quantitative way to analyze muscle contractions and to reveal how body posture in embryos is maintained during series of peristaltic waves of muscle contractions.

Peristaltic muscle contractions are controlled by central pattern generator (CPG) circuits and communications between neurons of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), the central nervous system (CNS), and muscles⁴^,⁵. Failure to produce normal peristaltic muscle contractions can lead to defects such as failure to hatch² and abnormal larval locomotion⁶ and can be indicative of neurological abnormalities. Live imaging of peristaltic waves of muscle contraction and detailed analysis of contraction phenotypes can help uncover pathogenic mechanisms associated with genetic defects affecting muscles and neural circuits involved in locomotion. We recently used that approach to investigate mechanisms that result in a body posture torsion phenotype of protein O–mannosyltransferase (POMT) mutants⁷.

Protein O-mannosylation (POM) is a special type of posttranslational modification, where a mannose sugar is added to serine or threonine residues of secretory pathway proteins⁸^,⁹. Genetic defects in POM cause congenital muscular dystrophies (CMD) in humans¹⁰^,¹¹^,¹². We investigated the causative mechanisms of these diseases using Drosophila as a model system. We found that embryos with mutations in Drosophila protein O-mannosyltransferase genes POMT1 and POMT2 (a.k.a. rotated abdomen (rt) and twisted (tw)) show a displacement ("rotation") of body segments, which results in an abnormal body posture⁷. Interestingly, this defect coincided with the developmental stage when peristaltic muscle contractions become prominent⁷.

Since abnormal body posture in POM mutant embryos arises when musculature and epidermis are already formed and peristaltic waves of coordinated muscle contractions have started, we hypothesized that abnormal body posture could be a result of abnormal muscle contractions rather than a defect in muscle or/and epidermis morphology⁷. CMDs can be associated with abnormal muscle contractions and posture defects¹³, and thus the analysis of the posture phenotype in Drosophila POMT mutants may elucidate pathological mechanisms associated with muscular dystrophies. In order to investigate the relationship between the body posture phenotype of Drosophila POMT mutants and possible abnormalities in peristaltic waves of muscle contractions, we decided to analyze muscle contractions in detail using a live imaging approach.

Our analysis of peristaltic contraction waves in Drosophila embryos revealed two distinct contraction modes, designated as type 1 and type 2 waves. Type 1 waves are simple waves propagating from anterior to posterior or vice versa. Type 2 waves are biphasic waves that initiate at the anterior end, propagate halfway in the posterior direction, momentarily halt, forming a temporal static contraction, and then, during the second phase, are swept by a peristaltic contraction that propagates forward from the posterior end. Wild-type embryos normally generate a series of contractions that consists of approximately 75% type 1 and 25% type 2 waves. In contrast, POMT mutant embryos generate type 1 and type 2 waves at approximately equal relative frequencies.

Our approach can provide detailed information for quantitative analysis of muscle contractions and embryo rolling⁷. This approach could also be adapted for analyses of other behaviors involving muscle contractions, such as hatching and crawling.

Protocol

1. Preparation

Prepare a fly cage by making approximately 50 holes in a 100 mL capacity tri-corner plastic beaker using a hot 25 G needle (see Table of Materials).
Prepare 60 mm x 15 mm Petri dishes with apple juice-agar (3% agar and 30% apple juice).
Prepare fresh yeast paste by mixing dry yeast granules and water. Spread the yeast paste onto the apple agar plates to increase egg laying.
Anaesthetize about 50-60 flies (use approximately equal numbers of males and females) on CO₂ and put them in the fly cage.
NOTE: Using an increased proportion of females (up to ~2:1 ratio of females:males) may help increase the amount of laid eggs for some genotypes.
Attach an apple juice-agar Petri dish with yeast paste to the fly cage tightly and seal it with modeling clay. Make sure it is sealed at all corners.
Wait until flies wake up from anesthesia and then invert the cage such that the Petri dish is now at the bottom. Put the cage into an incubator with controlled temperature (25 °C) and humidity (60%).
Allow flies to lay eggs for 2-3 h, replace the apple plate with a fresh one, and let the plate with eggs age for 19-20 h in an incubator.
NOTE: Prior to the above step, flies must be synchronized to facilitate collection of stage 17e-f (19-21 h AEL) embryos. This can be achieved by transferring flies to a cage with a fresh yeast-apple juice-agar plate 3-4 times for 12 h (once every 3-4 h). Keeping flies at controlled circadian light environment (LD cycle) can also help with collecting a synchronized population of embryos, but this was not essential in our experiments.

2. Collection of Embryos

Carefully pick embryos with a wet paintbrush and place them in a collecting glass dish filled with 1x PBS.
Select the embryos that have their tracheae filled with air. Air-filled tracheae indicate that embryos have reached Stage 17, and their peristaltic muscle contractions should have begun. Tracheae become clearly visible when they are filled with air, which can serve as a marker for Stage 17.
Place an apple juice agar slab on a glass slide and carefully transfer embryos from PBS to the slab. Line up the embryos with their ventral side up.
NOTE: Dorsal and ventral sides of embryos can be distinguished by the position of dorsal appendages on the eggshell.
Make a rectangular wax boundary on another glass slide using a wax pen (see Table of Materials).
Place a double-sided sticky tape within that boundary and gently pick up the embryos by lowering this slide onto the agar slab. Apply gentle pressure to ensure that embryos stick to the tape well, with their dorsal side up. If necessary, embryos can be rolled on the tape to correct their orientation. Do all manipulations while monitoring embryos under a dissection microscope.
Cover embryos with 1x PBS for live imaging of muscle contractions.
NOTE: Some procedures described above are related to basic Drosophila techniques used in many studies. More detailed descriptions of common Drosophila techniques can be found elsewhere¹⁴.

3. Recording of Embryos

Perform live imaging of mounted embryos on an epiflourescence microscope with a time-lapse function and a digital camera with suitable emission filters (see Table of Materials) using a 10x water immersion objective lens.
NOTE: Here we used embryos expressing GFP in muscles. Other fluorescent markers with suitable excitation light and emission filter sets can also be used (e.g., for tdTomato detection, one can use a Chroma ET-561 filter set for excitation and emission around optimal 554 nm and 581 nm, respectively).
Perform live video recording of embryos using suitable software (see Table of Materials) for about 1-2 h with an acquisition rate of 4 frames/s.
NOTE: To analyze rolling of the developing embryo within its shell, embryos without expression of fluorescent markers can be used. To this end, regular transmitted light illumination without spectral filters is applied to visualize embryo motion within the shell (See Movie 2).

4. Analysis of the Recordings

Export the recorded video directly into Image J for further analyses (e.g., as AVI files).
In ImageJ, crop the video recordings to the size of individual embryos by drawing a box around each embryo and then clicking on Image > Crop. This greatly reduces the size of video files without affecting its resolution and facilitates their analysis.
Rotate cropped images to achieve vertical position of the embryo midline relative to the screen, by clicking on Image > Transform > Rotate.
NOTE: Selecting Visualizar during this process will provide guidance for rotation, showing gridlines to ensure vertical position of the midline.
Quantitative analysis of embryo rolling:
NOTE: For distance analyses, first confirm that your images include scale information. Image scale can be added by selecting Analyze > Set Scale, and then entering a conversion of pixels to distances, e.g., micrometers
1. Mark the position of one or both tracheae in the first frame of the video at a point midway between posterior and anterior ends. Click on Analyze > Tools > ROI manager and record this position as slice number-y coordinate-x coordinate by drawing a box of approximately 7 µm by 7 µm around it and typing t on the keyboard. Ensure that when typing t, a region of interest is selected on the video. Alternatively, select the Add (t) tab on the ROI manager to record the position of trachea instead of typing the command.
  NOTE: The region of interest can vary in shape or size depending on the embryonic region or developmental event being studied.
2. Mark the position of the same area of the trachea after each peristaltic contraction. Measure the distance from the pre-contraction position to the post-contraction position by drawing a line connecting the centers of each box and typing m on the keyboard. Convert the distance to µm using a known scale of images. Alternatively, measure the distance in µm in a single step by clicking on Analyze > Set Scale and enter the known pixel-to-micron conversion factor to yield a report in microns.
  NOTE: A distance in pixels can be entered together with its corresponding distance in µm.
3. Correlate the distance and direction of each rolling event with the direction of muscle contraction propagation in at least 8 embryos for statistically significant differences.
Quantitative analysis of embryonic muscle contractions:
1. Use embryos expressing fluorescent markers in muscles (e.g., we used transgenic flies expressing a fusion construct of Myosin Heavy Chain promoter and GFP called MHC-GFP⁵) to analyze muscle contraction parameters such as contraction amplitude.
2. Use the recording of fluorescent readout and draw a region of interest (e.g., a box of 15 µm to 45 µm [HXW]) centered on the muscles (which are clearly visible due to the presence of fluorescent marker) of a particular body segment, and select the Add (t) tab on the ROI manager to record the position of the ROI. Click on ROI manager > Measure to record the average fluorescent intensity of each region of interest selected for each frame of the video.
3. Move the box to the centers of other body segments of interest and click on Add (t) in the ROI manager to record their positions. This will give regions of interest of identical size in all body segments to be analyzed. Select at least one posterior, one medial, and one anterior segment, e.g., A7, A4, and T2, respectively.
4. In the ROI manager, select all regions of interest recorded as slice number-y coordinate-x coordinate (e.g., by selecting while holding Ctrl) and click on Mais > Multi measure to measure the mean fluorescent intensity of each region of interest for all frames of the video, and report each measurement in a table. Each region of interest is a column of the table, and each frame is a row. Transfer the table to a spreadsheet program for further analyses.
5. Plot a graph with frame number on the x-axis and mean fluorescent intensity on the y-axis. Frame number can be converted to time using the frame rate (4 frames/s) of the video (Figure 1A).
6. Determine muscle contraction amplitude by estimating the increase in GFP fluorescence intensity relative to the baseline. Muscle contractions increase the GFP intensity as they bring more GFP into the vicinity of the focal area as more muscles get pulled in during these contractions (Movie 1)⁷. Establish a baseline fluorescence as the average intensity between contraction waves. Normalize GFP intensity to the baseline by dividing every ROI intensity value by the baseline intensity.
  NOTE: Each profile has a different baseline fluorescence, as there may be different expression levels in different muscle segments.
  NOTE: One potential complication is that the GFP fluorescence may change over time due to photo bleaching. This can be resolved by monitoring changes in fluorescence baseline and using a sufficient sample size for wave analyses (we normally use sets of 10 fluorescent waves and confirm that the baseline is approximately constant by taking an average of only those peak minima as baseline that have decreased in fluorescence by 10% or less relative to the initial minima peak). A pulse-LED illumination may be also applied to mitigate that problem¹⁶.
7. Compare muscle contractions on left and right sides of the embryo by analyzing peak intensities on both sides of the embryo for same segments. Use contraction amplitude and time of peak intensities to examine differences in extent and timing of peristaltic muscle contraction waves propagating along both sides of the embryo.
8. Compare normalized intensity of GFP at different segments (e.g., at anterior, medial and posterior regions) during muscle contraction wave propagation to examine changes in the contraction as the wave propagates. This analysis also determines the direction of the wave (i.e., whether it propagates toward anterior or posterior regions of the embryo).

Representative Results

Normal peristaltic muscle contractions are shown in a WT (wild-type, Canton-S) embryo in Movie 1. The average frequency of peristaltic waves of muscle contractions in our analysis was 47 contractions per hour and the average amplitude was 60% above baseline for WT embryos. Embryo rolling is shown for a WT embryo in Movie 2, with the white arrow marking the initial position of a trachea and a black arrow depicting the position of a dorsal appendage. The dorsal appendage (exterior) does not move whereas the tracheae (interior) does, indicating that the embryo has rolled within its shell

In our analysis of pattern of muscle contractions, we designated a peristaltic contraction as a type 1 wave if its profile has a peak that arises at the posterior region first, followed by peaks at middle and anterior regions (forward wave) or a profile in which the peak first arises at anterior segments and then propagates toward posterior regions (backward wave) (Figure 2A and Movie 1). We also observed another type of waves that we designated as Type 2. Type 2 waves start at one end of the embryo (usually anterior), proceed toward the middle regions, and then return to their origin as a sweeping wave re-initiated at the opposite end (Figure 2A and Movie 1, wave 4). POMT mutant embryos show abnormal relative frequency of type 1/type 2 wave generation (Figure 3), which results in body posture abnormality, the body torsion (or "rotation") phenotype (Figure 4).

Figure 1A shows muscle contraction amplitude monitored over time as normalized GFP intensity at different embryo segments (anterior, middle and posterior). Peaks during 165-178 s time period represent a simple forward wave (Type 1).Figure 1B shows that there is no difference in the amplitude (depicted as GFP intensity) and time of muscle contractions on right and left sides of the embryo.

Figure 2 shows Type 1 and Type 2 muscle contraction profiles generated using GFP intensity as a measure of contraction amplitude. A type 1 wave is a single wave generated at the anterior or posterior end of the embryo that continues propagation towards the opposite end. Type 2 is a biphasic wave in which the wave propagates to the middle of the embryo during the first phase and then returns to the origin as a peristaltic contraction reinitiated at the opposite end. Each wave line represents normalized GFP intensity detected in successive body segments of an embryo, and peaks correspond to muscle contraction. Slant appearance of the peaks illustrates that muscle contractions propagate along successive segments, from anterior to posterior, or vice versa, and thus peaks occur in a consecutive manner in successive body segments.

Figure 3 includes graphs of contraction wave series in WT and POMT mutant embryos. The graphs illustrate that Type 2 contraction waves are generated at increased relative frequency in POMT mutants, as compared to WT embryo. The series of waves in WT embryo (top graph) depicts the contractions shown in Movie 1.

Figure 4 shows fixed WT and POMT mutant embryos with muscles stained with fluorescein-conjugated phalloidin to highlight embryo body posture. The curved dashed line illustrates the body posture phenotype of a POMT mutant.

Movie 1: Example of peristaltic muscle contractions of a WT embryo. Muscle contractions are shown in a pseudocolor format to illustrate increase in GFP intensity when contraction occurs (most bright pixels are red). The video was acquired at 4 frames/s (fps) and is shown at 20 fps. Please click here to view this video. (Right-click to download.)

Movie 2: A wild-type embryo rolling within its shell. White arrow indicates the initial position of a trachea, and black arrow indicates the position of a dorsal appendage. Note that as the embryo rolls, tracheal position changes but the dorsal appendage does not move, which illustrates that the embryo rolls inside its eggshell. Please click here to view this video. (Right-click to download.)

Figure 1: Muscle contraction amplitude. (A) GFP intensity is plotted against (Y- axis) time (X-axis) for different body segments of the embryo. (B) GFP intensity (Y- axis) plotted against time for left and right sides of the same segment of a contracting embryo. Frame rate is 4 frames/s for both graphs. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Type 1 and Type 2 peristaltic muscle contraction wave profiles. (A) Type 1 wave profile in which individual lines represent normalized GFP intensities of particular body segments over time, while the peaks indicate contraction events. (B) Type 2 wave profile that shows an example of a biphasic contraction wave, plotted in the same way as in A. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Series of contraction waves generated by wild-type and POMT mutant embryos. Blue and red bars depict Type 1 and Type 2 waves, respectively. Note that the POMT mutant generates an increased proportion of Type 2 waves, as compared to WT. The WT graph represents contractions shown in Movie 1. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Fixed and stained POMT mutant (rt^–) and WT embryos. Note the rotation in body segments of the POMT mutant embryo, highlighted by a dashed line tracing the position of midline. Muscles are visualized using staining with fluorescein-conjugated phalloidin. Anterior is to the left, dorsal is up. Scale bar = 100 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Discussion

Our method provides a quantitative way to analyze important embryo behaviors during development, such as peristaltic muscle contraction waves, including wave periodicity, amplitude and pattern, as well as wave effect on embryo rolling and posture. This can be useful in analyses of different mutants to study the role of specific genes in regulating these and other behaviors during embryonic development. We have used changes in muscle-specific GFP marker intensity to analyze muscle contraction amplitude, frequency and direction of contraction wave propagation in embryos. These changes in GFP signal reflect the extent of contractions, as contracting body segments bring more GFP into an ROI and the vicinity of the focal area. This approach significantly simplifies analyses and gives a better visual representation of the pattern of peristaltic contraction waves.

In our experiments, we used genotypes with muscle-specific transgenic expression of GFP to visualize and study in detail muscle contractions during embryonic development. Other studies used a similar approach to analyze larval motion such as crawling and bending⁵^,¹⁵. A similar technique to study coordinated muscle contractions was previously applied for sandwich preparation of embryos, which is a more invasive approach that may affect embryo behavior and development³. In contrast, our method is completely non-invasive and the embryos are unperturbed during assays. Our protocol doesn’t require the embryos to be dechorionated or devitellinated, and live embryos of interest can be recovered after assays and propagated for further analyses.

Our method can potentially be developed further for a high content analysis (HCA)-based screening to isolate and analyze mutations that affect embryonic muscle contractions and other behaviors and developmental processes. This strategy, for instance, can be used to simultaneously record muscle contractions of many embryos and for assessing their response to various stimuli, drugs, or environmental changes.

Declarações

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The project was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1 NS099409, NS075534, and CONACYT 2012-037(S) to VP.

Materials

Digital camera	Hamamatsu CMOS ORCA-Flash 4.0	C13440-20CU	With different emission filters
Forceps	FST Dumont	11254-20	Tip Dimensions 0.05 mm x 0.01 mm
LED	X-cite BDX (Excelitas)	XLED1
Microscope	Carl Ziess Examiner D1	491405-0005-000	Epiflourescence with time lapse
Needle	BD	305767	25 G x 1-1/2 in
Paintbrush	Contemporary crafts		Any paintbrush will work
Petri dishes	VWR	25384-164	60 mm x 15 mm
Software	HCImage Live
Thread Zap Wax pen	Thread Zap II (by BeadSmith)(Amazon)	TZ1300	Burner Tool
Tricorner plastic beaker	VWR	25384-152	100 mL

Referências

Pereanu, W., Spindler, S., Im, E., Buu, N., Hartenstein, V. The emergence of patterned movement during late embryogenesis of Drosophila. Developmental Neurobiology. 67, 1669-1685 (2007).
Suster, M. L., Bate, M. Embryonic assembly of a central pattern generator without sensory input. Nature. 416, 174-178 (2002).
Crisp, S., Evers, J. F., Fiala, A., Bate, M. The development of motor coordination in Drosophila embryos. Development. 135, 3707-3717 (2008).
Song, W., Onishi, M., Jan, L. Y., Jan, Y. N. Peripheral multidendritic sensory neurons are necessary for rhythmic locomotion behavior in Drosophila larvae. Proceedings of National Academy of Science of the United States of America. 104, 5199-5204 (2007).
Hughes, C. L., Thomas, J. B. A sensory feedback circuit coordinates muscle activity in Drosophila. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience. 35, 383-396 (2007).
Gorczyca, D. A., et al. Identification of Ppk26, a DEG/ENaC channel functioning with Ppk1 in a mutually dependent manner to guide locomotion behavior in Drosophila. Cell Reports. 9, 1446-1458 (2014).
Baker, R., Nakamura, N., Chandel, I., et al. Protein O-Mannosyltransferases affect sensory axon wiring and dynamic chirality of body posture in the Drosophila embryo. Journal of Neuroscience. 38 (7), 1850-1865 (2018).
Nakamura, N., Lyalin, D., Panin, V. M. Protein O-mannosylation in animal development and physiology: From human Disorders to Drosophila phenotypes. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 21, 622-630 (2010).
Lyalin, D., et al. The twisted gene encodes Drosophila protein O-mannosyltransferase 2 and genetically interacts with the rotated abdomen gene encoding Drosophila protein O-mannosyltransferase 1. Genética. 172, 343-353 (2006).
Beltrán-Valero de Bernabe, D., et al. Mutations in the O-Mannosyltransferase gene POMT1 give rise to the severe neuronal migration disorder Walker-Warburg Syndrome. American Journal of Human Genetics. 71, 1033-1043 (2002).
Reeuwijk, J., et al. POMT2 mutations cause alpha-dystroglycan hypoglycosylation and Walker-Warburg syndrome. Journal of Medical Genetics. 42, 907-912 (2005).
Jaeken, J., Matthijs, G. Congenital disorders of glycosylation: A rapidly expanding disease family. Annual Reviews of Genomics and Human Genetics. 8, 261-278 (2007).
Leyten, Q. H., Gabreels, F. J., Renier, W. O., ter Laak, H. J. Congenital muscular dystrophy: a review of the literature. Clinical and Neurological Neurosurgery. 98 (4), 267-280 (1996).
Roberts, D. B., Hames, B. D. Drosophila: A Practical Approach. 2nd ed. The Practical Approach Series. , 389 (1998).
Heckscher, E. S., et al. Even-Skipped+ interneurons are core components of a sensorimotor circuit that maintains left-right symmetric muscle contraction amplitude. Neuron. 88, 314-329 (2015).
Penjweini, R., et al. Long-term monitoring of live cell proliferation in presence of PVP-Hypericin: a new strategy using ms pulses of LED and the fluorescent dye CFSE. J. Microscopy. 245, 100-108 (2011).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Citar este artigo

Chandel, I., Baker, R., Nakamura, N., Panin, V. Live Imaging and Analysis of Muscle Contractions in Drosophila Embryo. J. Vis. Exp. (149), e59404, doi:10.3791/59404 (2019).