Science Education
>

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

PREPARAÇÃO DO INSTRUTOR
CONCEITOS
PROTOCOLO DO ALUNO
JoVE Journal
Neurociência
É necessária uma assinatura da JoVE para visualizar este conteúdo.  Faça login ou comece sua avaliação gratuita.
JoVE Journal Neurociência
Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

All animals were paired-housed under standard conditions (12 h light/dark, constant temperature environment, free access to food and water) according to the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology Laboratory Animals Guidelines and experiments were approved by the local ethical committee of Guangzhou University. This is a non-survival procedure. 

NOTE: For data shown in the representative results, APP/PS1 (B6C3-Tg (APPswe, PSEN1dE9) 85Dbo/J) double-transgenic mice and littermate wild-type (WT) controls at 3-5 months of age, were used for recordings (n = 10, per group).

1. Animal anesthesia and surgery

  1. Weigh and anesthetize the mouse by your approved anesthesia regimen from your local animal care committee. 
  2. Perform a tail or toe pinch with forceps to confirm deep anesthesia prior to surgery.
  3. Position the mouse in a stereotaxic apparatus and fix its head.
  4. Apply eye ointment on both eyes to keep moist. Follow your local animal care guidelines regarding pre- and postoperative analgesia. 
  5. Shave the hair using surgical clippers. Make a small incision (12-15 mm) in the middle of the exposed surgical area with scissors. Using forceps, gently pull the scalp away from the midline.
  6. Separate the skin gently and remove residual tissue. Clean the skull using hydrogen peroxide-coated cotton buds.
  7. Drill two small holes of radii 1.0-1.5 mm on both left and right sides of the skull to allow insertion of the recording microelectrodes into the M2 regions under a stereomicroscope (Figure 1A).
    NOTE: Stereotaxic locations of bilateral M2: 1.94 mm anterior to the bregma, 1.0 mm lateral to the midline, and 0.8-1.1 mm ventral to the dura.
  8. Remove the dura mater carefully with a tungsten needle.
  9. Pull glass borosilicate micropipettes (outer diameter: 1.0 mm) as recording microelectrodes with resistance of 1-2 MΩ.
  10. Insert two separate recording microelectrodes filled with 0.5 M NaCl into the holes using mechanical micromanipulators (at 60°, Figure 1B).

2. LFP recordings in bilateral M2 of mice

  1. Lower the left and right glass electrodes slowly into appropriate coordinates of bilateral M2 (Figure 1C).
  2. For quality control, test the resistance of each electrode using the differential amplifier before capturing LFPs.
  3. Set the recording process at 0.1 Hz high-pass and 1,000 Hz low-pass with 1,000x amplification.
  4. Collect digitized raw LFP data of at least 60 s spontaneous activities in stable state, with mice breathing evenly at a respiratory rate of 2 breaths per second under anesthesia.
  5. After recording, slowly raise the electrodes out of the brain, then euthanize the mice by fast cervical dislocation.
  6. Save the data and analyze offline.

3. Cross-correlation analysis

  1. Click Analysis – Waveform correlation in the analysis software and import the data.
  2. Parameter settings
    1. Define one waveform channel signal as the first channel and the other as the reference. Set width as 2 and offset as 1 (Figure 2A).
    2. Set the duration of both LFPs for 100 s by selecting the start time and end time. Press the Process button to perform cross-correlation analysis (Figure 2B).
      NOTE: Simultaneous bilateral signals with such durations would be long enough to show neuronal spontaneous activities, thereby revealing the basic properties of synchronization.
  3. Click File – Export As, then save the cross-correlation results corresponding to the resulting pop-up chart in .txt format.
  4. Open the .txt file (Figure 2C), remove the correlation values at time lags ranged 0 ± 0.01 s (since two continuous gamma waves have at least 0.01 s interval), then average the rest of the cross-correlation data in the negative time lag part or average the rest of the cross-correlation data in the positive time lag part.

4. Coherence analysis

  1. Import and run the data in the analysis software.
  2. Assign the two LFP signals to be the first and second waveform channels separately. Then set the block size value (Figure 3A).
    NOTE: Block size means the number of data points used in the FFT. The larger the block size, the better the frequency resolution. Here we recommend setting it as 4096.
  3. Move the dotted lines manually to ensure the time accuracy for signals in both channels are being set as the same period (Figure 3B). Press the Add Area button to load the area and perform coherence analysis.
  4. Click File – Save As to save the coherence results corresponding to the resulting pop-up chart in .txt format (Figure 3B).

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

Learning Objectives

To see whether early AD pathology impairs the capacity of hemisphere lateralization, we conducted bilateral extracellular LFP recordings in the left and right M2 of APP/PS1 mice and WT controls (aged 3-5 months), and analyzed the cross-correlation of these left and right LFPs. In WT mice, the results demonstrated that the mean correlation between left and right LFPs at positive time lags differed significantly from that at negative time lags, implicating the existence of hemispheric asymmetries in M2 areas of WT controls (Figure 4C; WT-positive, 0.08161 ± 0.01246; WT-negative, 0.0206 ± 0.01218; p = 4.74531E-4 < 0.001 by a two sample t-test). In comparison, the left and right LFPs of APP/PS1 mice showed higher synchronized in time domain, suggesting a reduction of asymmetry between the left and right M2 (Figure 4C; APP/PS1-positive, 0.13336 ± 0.0105 APP/PS1-negative, 0.12635 ± 0.01066; p = 0.64157 > 0.05 by a two sample t-test).

We then filtered gamma oscillations from the LFPs (Figure 5A) and performed a coherence analysis as described in the protocol to measure the similarity of electrical signals in the gamma frequency range. The result showed that the gamma coherence between left and right M2 in APP/PS1 was significantly higher than that in WT mice (Figure 5B,C; WT, 0.13267 ± 0.00598; APP/PS1, 0.17078 ± 0.0072; p = 0.00550 < 0.01 by two sample t-test), indicating a higher synchronization, and consequently reduced lateralization, between left and right M2 in APP/PS1 mice.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Diagram of the simultaneous LFP recording procedure. (A) Stereotaxic mouse with skull exposed and dura mater removed for in vivo bilateral recording of LFPs in left and right M2. (B) Two glass microelectrodes in touch with the cortical surface in the hole drilled simultaneously. (C) Recording microelectrodes along with the Ag/AgCl wires as reference electrodes positioned at appropriate sites. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Illustration of cross-correlation analysis. (A) Settings for the waveform correlation dialog box. This provides options for choosing which waveform channel is the reference and for analyzing the correlation of two signals. (B) The process dialog box. This provides options for setting the time length of the reference waveform and the duration of another waveform will be appended. The analysis is only done for regions of data in which both waveform channels exist. (C) Example .txt file with values of cross-correlation at negative and positive time lag ranges separately for statistics. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Illustration of coherence analysis. (A) Parameter settings for the coherence dialog box. The block size determines the number of data points used in the analysis, and the frequency resolution. (B) The dotted lines are adjustable for operator to move manually in order to set the duration of signals for analyzing. (C) After the software has created a chart, click File – Save As to save the coherence results as a file with a .txt filename extension . Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Cross-correlation indicates the declined hemisphere lateralization between left and right M2 of APP/PS1 mice. (A) Representative raw traces of LFPs recorded simultaneously in bilateral M2 of WT and APP/PS1 mice using extracellular recording method (L: left M2; R: right M2). (B) The cross correlation curve shows correlation of bilateral LFP signals at different time lags. (C) Between left and right M2, WT controls showed significantly higher cross-correlation value at positive time lag ranges than negative ones. In contrast, the cross-correlation value of APP/PS1 mice has a similarity, indicating a decline of asymmetry (n = 10, per group). Value represents mean ± standard error of the mean. ***p < 0.001; two sample t-test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Coherence of gamma oscillations between left and right M2 of WT and APP/PS1 mice. (A) Representative traces of gamma oscillations filtered from LFPs in left and right M2. (B) Coherence distribution between LFPs simultaneously recorded in bilateral M2. APP/PS1 mice differ largely from WT controls in gamma frequency range. (C) The coherence between gamma oscillations of bilateral M2 in
APP/PS1 mice are significantly higher than WT controls (n = 10, per group). Value represents mean ± standard error of the mean. **, p < 0.01; two sample t-test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

List of Materials

AC/DC Differential Amplifier A-M Systems Model 3000
Analog Digital converter Cambridge Electronic Design Ltd. Micro1401
Glass borosilicate micropipettes Nanjing spring teaching experimental equipment company 161230 Outer diameter: 1.0mm
Microelectrode puller Narishige PC-10
NaCl Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory 7647-14-5
Pin microelectrode holder World Precision Instruments, INC. MEH3SW10
Spike2  Cambridge Electronic Design Ltd.
Stereomicroscope Zeiss 435064-9020-000
Stereotaxic apparatus  RWD Life Science 68045
Urethane Sigma-Aldrich 94300

Preparação do Laboratório

This article demonstrates complete, detailed procedures for both in vivo bilateral recording and analysis of local field potential (LFP) in the cortical areas of mice, which are useful for evaluating possible laterality deficits, as well as for assessing brain connectivity and coupling of neural network activities in rodents. The pathological mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD), a common neurodegenerative disease, remain largely unknown. Altered brain laterality has been demonstrated in aging people, but whether or not abnormal lateralization is one of the early signs of AD has not been determined. To investigate this, we recorded bilateral LFPs in 3-5-month-old AD model mice, APP/PS1, together with littermate wild type (WT) controls. The LFPs of the left and right secondary motor cortex (M2), specifically in the gamma band, were more synchronized in APP/PS1 mice than in WT controls, suggesting a declined hemispheric asymmetry of bilateral M2 in this AD mouse model. Notably, the recording and data analysis processes are flexible and easy to carry out, and can also be applied to other brain pathways when conducting experiments that focus on neuronal circuits.

This article demonstrates complete, detailed procedures for both in vivo bilateral recording and analysis of local field potential (LFP) in the cortical areas of mice, which are useful for evaluating possible laterality deficits, as well as for assessing brain connectivity and coupling of neural network activities in rodents. The pathological mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD), a common neurodegenerative disease, remain largely unknown. Altered brain laterality has been demonstrated in aging people, but whether or not abnormal lateralization is one of the early signs of AD has not been determined. To investigate this, we recorded bilateral LFPs in 3-5-month-old AD model mice, APP/PS1, together with littermate wild type (WT) controls. The LFPs of the left and right secondary motor cortex (M2), specifically in the gamma band, were more synchronized in APP/PS1 mice than in WT controls, suggesting a declined hemispheric asymmetry of bilateral M2 in this AD mouse model. Notably, the recording and data analysis processes are flexible and easy to carry out, and can also be applied to other brain pathways when conducting experiments that focus on neuronal circuits.

Procedimento

This article demonstrates complete, detailed procedures for both in vivo bilateral recording and analysis of local field potential (LFP) in the cortical areas of mice, which are useful for evaluating possible laterality deficits, as well as for assessing brain connectivity and coupling of neural network activities in rodents. The pathological mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD), a common neurodegenerative disease, remain largely unknown. Altered brain laterality has been demonstrated in aging people, but whether or not abnormal lateralization is one of the early signs of AD has not been determined. To investigate this, we recorded bilateral LFPs in 3-5-month-old AD model mice, APP/PS1, together with littermate wild type (WT) controls. The LFPs of the left and right secondary motor cortex (M2), specifically in the gamma band, were more synchronized in APP/PS1 mice than in WT controls, suggesting a declined hemispheric asymmetry of bilateral M2 in this AD mouse model. Notably, the recording and data analysis processes are flexible and easy to carry out, and can also be applied to other brain pathways when conducting experiments that focus on neuronal circuits.

Tags