NOTE: Nitric oxide fumigation of fresh products starts by establishing ultralow oxygen conditions in fumigation chambers, followed by injection of NO and holding the fumigation chambers at certain temperatures for the duration of a specific treatment, and then is terminated by flushing with N2 to dilute NO prior to opening the fumigation chambers as illustrated (Figure 3). For measurements of NO2 in the head space of fumigation chambers and nitrate and nitrite in liquid samples using the Model 405 nm NO2/NO/NOx monitor and NOA nitric oxide analyzer, please refer to the user manuals from the manufacturers for detailed operation procedures.
Caution: Nitric oxide is a strong oxidizing agent and will react with oxygen spontaneously to produce nitrogen dioxide. Both nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide are toxic. Please refer to their MSDS for safe handling and use. For personal safety, all steps of small scale fumigation experiments involving handling and potential exposure to NO or NO2 should be carried out in a fume hood. A personal NO2 alarm should be used to conduct large scale NO fumigation experiments.
1. Preparation of Materials and Instruments
2. Establishment of ULO Conditions in Fumigation Chambers
3. Injection of NO Gas
4. Measure NO Concentration in a Fumigation Chamber
NOTE: NO concentrations in fumigation for pest control may range from 2,000 ppm (0.2%) to 50,000 ppm (5%). This range is "out of range" of current NO monitors. But, NO levels can still be measured in diluted samples or by using a dilution device.
5. Terminate NO Fumigation
6. Residue Analysis
7. Postharvest Quality Evaluation of Fruit and Vegetables
NOTE: Product injuries from NO fumigation may show up immediately after fumigation (Figure 5). However, product quality is usually evaluated after 1 – 2 weeks of post-treatment cold storage. Symptoms of injuries will progress over time and can be better identified in quality evaluation. Procedures for evaluating different fresh products may differ substantially. Only procedures for evaluating lettuce quality are demonstrated here as an example using established procedures5.
Nitric oxide fumigation for fresh products needs to be terminated with an N2 flush to dilute NO before opening fumigation chambers to expose products to ambient air. When a fumigation treatment is terminated by directly opening the chamber to ambient air without an N2 flush, the reaction between NO and O2 will result in NO2 production and exposure of fresh products to NO2 often results in injuries including brown stains, discoloration, and dead tissue spots8. Delicate vegetables and fruits such as lettuce, zucchini, and pears are prone to damage by NO2. When NO fumigation is terminated properly with an N2 flush, the fumigation treatment has been demonstrated to be safe without any injuries to product quality (Figure 6 and Figure 7). In fact, NO fumigation for pest control has been found to enhance postharvest quality of fresh products as compared with unfumigated controls as demonstrated on strawberries. Strawberries fumigated with NO for control of western flower thrips retain a brighter and richer color and are also less soft one week after fumigation as compared with the control8. Lettuce heads wrapped in plastic sleeves may sustain injuries to surface leaves directly underneath ventilation holes of the wraps due to reaction of NO with O2 to produce NO2 if fumigation is not terminated properly.
Flushing with N2 at the end of NO fumigation affected NO2 release from fumigated products. When NO fumigation was terminated with N2 flush, there were no significant differences in NO2 release rate between the treatment and the control. NO fumigation treatment flushed with air at the end of fumigation, however, had a higher NO2 release rate as compared with the control and the release of NO2 declined over time.
For most fresh products including lettuce, broccoli, strawberry, apple, orange, etc., there were no significant differences in NO3– or NO2– levels between the treatment that was terminated with an N2 flush and the control. Only when NO fumigation treatment was terminated by flushing with normal air, there were significantly higher NO3– and NO2– concentrations in all fumigated products than both control and N2 flushed fumigated products. NO2– concentration was generally not detectable in both fumigated and control products (Table 1 and Table 2). Therefore, there were no significant levels of residues from NO fumigated fresh products at 24 h after fumigation when fumigation was terminated properly with nitrogen flushing.
Figure 1: Effects of NO fumigation on insects and mites. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Demonstration of injuries to lettuce by NO2 from the reaction between NO and O2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Flow chart of NO fumigation procedures. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Method of using a dilution device and a flu gas monitor with NO sensor to measure NO level in a large-scale NO fumigation test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Compare effects of fumigation treatments terminated by N2 flush and air flush on postharvest quality of fresh fruit and vegetables. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Postharvest quality of lettuce, broccoli, and apples from three treatments (C, T1, T2) 14 days after fumigation with C, T1, and T2 representing control, fumigation terminated with an N2 flush, and fumigation terminated with air flush, respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Postharvest quality of oranges, pears, and peaches from three treatments (C, T1, T2) 14 days after fumigation with C, T1, and T2 representing control, fumigation terminated with an N2 flush, and fumigation terminated with air flush, respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Product | NO (%) | Treatment | NO3– (mg/100 g) | NO2– (mg/100 g) |
Apple | 5.0 | NO-Air | 1.60±0.12 a | 0.50±0.16 a |
NO-N2 | 1.36±0.13 ab | 0.03±0.01 b | ||
Control | 0.76±0.28 b | 0 b | ||
Apricot | 3.0 | NO-Air | 1.84±0.14 a | 0.21±0.02 a |
NO-N2 | 0.92±0.17 b | 0 b | ||
Control | 0.54±0.01 b | 0 b | ||
Asparagus | 3.0 | NO-Air | 2.19±0.13 a | 0.08±0.04 a |
NO-N2 | 0.70±0.03 b | 0 a | ||
Control | 0.84±0.07 b | 0 a | ||
Blueberry | 3.0 | NO-Air | 2.74±0.46 a | 0.14±0.02 a |
NO-N2 | 1.24±0.19 b | 0 b | ||
Control | 1.22±0.15 b | 0 b | ||
Broccoli | 3.0 | NO-Air | 18.69±3.75 a | 0.17±0.06 a |
NO-N2 | 18.51±3.42 a | 0 b | ||
Control | 12.26±2.31 a | 0 b | ||
Cherry | 3.0 | NO-Air | 1.75±0.11 a | 0 |
NO-N2 | 0.56±0.09 b | 0 | ||
Control | 0.65±0.08 b | 0 | ||
Garlic | 3.0 | NO-Air | 5.05±0.45 a | 0.14±0.02 a |
NO-N2 | 4.45±0.79 a | 0 b | ||
Control | 5.01±0.69 a | 0 b | ||
Grape | 3.0 | NO-Air | 6.32±0.68 a | 0 |
NO-N2 | 2.38±0.43 b | 0 | ||
Control | 2.74±0.25 b | 0 | ||
Pepper | 3.0 | NO-Air | 9.26±0.35 a | 0.71±0.12 a |
NO-N2 | 6.75±0.68 b | 0.02±0.01 b | ||
Control | 6.23±0.72 b | 0 b | ||
Kiwi | 3.0 | NO-Air | 1.66±0.55 a | 0 |
NO-N2 | 1.25±0.09 a | 0 | ||
Control | 1.41±0.31 a | 0 | ||
Lettuce | 2.0 | NO-Air | 112.85±20.17a | 7.99±2.02 a |
NO-N2 | 38.97±5.87 b | 0.1±0.1 b | ||
Control | 40.64±10.81b | 0 b | ||
Orange | 3.0 | NO-Air | 1.22±0.13 a | 0.27±0.05 a |
NO-N2 | 1.05±0.05 a | 0.02±0.01 b | ||
Control | 1.24±0.22 a | 0 b | ||
Plum | 3.0 | NO-Air | 1.04±0.08 a | 0 |
NO-N2 | 0.63±0.04 b | 0 | ||
Control | 0.84±0.11 ab | 0 | ||
Strawberry | 2.5 | NO-Air | 6.01±0.62 a | 0 |
NO-N2 | 5.30±0.77 a | 0 | ||
Control | 6.16±1.06 a | 0 |
Table 1: Nitrate and nitrite levels as residues at 24 h after 16 h nitric oxide fumigation on fresh fruit and vegetables. For each product, values followed by different letters are significantly different based on Tukey HSD multiple range test (P ≤0.05). Reprinted from Yang and Liu (2017).
Nitric oxide gas | Praxair | UN1660 | 99.5% purity |
Nitrogen gas | Praxair | UN1066 | Industry grade |
Fumigation chamber | (custom made) | Size: 30"x30"x30"; made of stainless steel with rubber gaskit along the rim. The chamber is sealed by clampdown its lid to the vaseline greased gaskit. The chamber has multiple ports for flushing the chamber and for taking air samples. | |
Nitric Oxide Analyzer | GE Scientific | NOA 280i analyzer | Measure NO plus NO2, Nitrate and nitrite |
Model 405nm NO2/NO/Nox monitor | 2B Technologies Inc | Ranges: NO (0-2ppm), NO2+NO (0-10ppm) | |
Kane 900+ gas monitor | Kane International | With NO, NO2, CO, O2 sensors | |
Flowmeter and controllers | Omega Engineering | Flow ranges: 0-1, 0-5, 0-20 LPM | |
Tubing, connectors, stopcocks | Cole-Parmer | Tubing: nylon and teflon, sizes: 1/8" and 5/32" (4mm); They fit to connectors and stockcocks | |
Oxygen analyzer | Illinois Instruments | Model 810 | Ziconia sensor, sensitivity: 0.1ppm, range: 0-100% |
NO2 personal alarm | SENSIT Technologies | Sensit P100 | Should be used in conducting large scale NO fumigations outside a fume hood |
Flowmeter and controllers | Omega Engineering | Flow ranges: 0-1, 0-5, 0-20 LPM | |
Gastight syringes | SGE Analytical Science | 10 ml, 100 ml | |
Gastight syringes | Hamilton Company | 10uL | |
Tubing, connectors, stopcocks | Cole-Parmer | Tubing: nylon and teflon, sizes: 1/8" and 5/32" (4mm); They fit to connectors and stockcocks | |
Sodium Iodide | Fisher Chemical | S324-100 | |
Acetic acid, Glacial | Fisher Chemical | UN2789 | ≥99.7% purity |
Hydrochloric acid | Cole-Parmer | SA48-500 | 1.0 Normal |
Vanadium(III) Chloride | Acros Organics | 197000250 | 97% purity |
Sodium Hydroxide | Fisher Chemical | BPSS266-1 | 1 M |
SAHARA S3 Stainless-steel heated bath circulator | ThermoFisher Scientific | ||
SC 100 Digiital Imersion Circulator | ThermoFisher Scientific | ||
Oxygen | Praxair | *001043 | 99.5-100% purity |
Hot Jaw | Sorbent Systems | Mylar bag heat sealer | |
Mylar bags | Sorbent Systems | ||
Flipmate filtration assemblies | Cole-Parmer | EW-35202-29 | |
15 ml polypropylane tube | Falcon | ||
Filter Paper P5 | Fisher Scientific | ||
Blender | Waring | Blender 7010G | Model WF2211212 |
Dilution device | Made in our lab | Combine the ends of four equal length Teflon microtubing into one connector and have a connector for each end of the four microtubing. |
Nitric oxide (NO) is a newly discovered fumigant for postharvest pest control. This paper provides detailed protocols for conducting NO fumigation on fresh products and procedures for residue analysis and product quality evaluation. An airtight fumigation chamber containing fresh fruit and vegetables is first flushed with nitrogen (N2) to establish an ultralow oxygen (ULO) environment followed by injection of NO. The fumigation chamber is then kept at a low temperature of 2 – 5 °C for a specified time period necessary to kill a target pest to complete a fumigation treatment. At the end of a fumigation treatment, the fumigation chamber is flushed with N2 to dilute NO prior to opening the chamber to ambient air to prevent the reaction between NO and O2, which produces NO2 and may damage delicate fresh products. At different times after NO fumigation, NO2 in headspace and nitrate and nitrite in liquid samples were measured as residues. Product quality was evaluated after 2 weeks of post-treatment cold storage to determine effects of NO fumigation on product quality. Keeping O2 from reacting with NO is critical to NO fumigation and is an important part of the protocols. Measuring NO levels is challenging and a practical solution is provided. Possible protocol modifications are also suggested for measuring NO levels in the fumigation chambers as well as residues. NO fumigation has the potential to be a practical alternative to methyl bromide fumigation for postharvest pest control on fresh and stored products. This publication is intended to assist other researchers in conducting NO fumigation research for postharvest pest control and accelerating the development of NO fumigation for practical applications.
Nitric oxide (NO) is a newly discovered fumigant for postharvest pest control. This paper provides detailed protocols for conducting NO fumigation on fresh products and procedures for residue analysis and product quality evaluation. An airtight fumigation chamber containing fresh fruit and vegetables is first flushed with nitrogen (N2) to establish an ultralow oxygen (ULO) environment followed by injection of NO. The fumigation chamber is then kept at a low temperature of 2 – 5 °C for a specified time period necessary to kill a target pest to complete a fumigation treatment. At the end of a fumigation treatment, the fumigation chamber is flushed with N2 to dilute NO prior to opening the chamber to ambient air to prevent the reaction between NO and O2, which produces NO2 and may damage delicate fresh products. At different times after NO fumigation, NO2 in headspace and nitrate and nitrite in liquid samples were measured as residues. Product quality was evaluated after 2 weeks of post-treatment cold storage to determine effects of NO fumigation on product quality. Keeping O2 from reacting with NO is critical to NO fumigation and is an important part of the protocols. Measuring NO levels is challenging and a practical solution is provided. Possible protocol modifications are also suggested for measuring NO levels in the fumigation chambers as well as residues. NO fumigation has the potential to be a practical alternative to methyl bromide fumigation for postharvest pest control on fresh and stored products. This publication is intended to assist other researchers in conducting NO fumigation research for postharvest pest control and accelerating the development of NO fumigation for practical applications.
Nitric oxide (NO) is a newly discovered fumigant for postharvest pest control. This paper provides detailed protocols for conducting NO fumigation on fresh products and procedures for residue analysis and product quality evaluation. An airtight fumigation chamber containing fresh fruit and vegetables is first flushed with nitrogen (N2) to establish an ultralow oxygen (ULO) environment followed by injection of NO. The fumigation chamber is then kept at a low temperature of 2 – 5 °C for a specified time period necessary to kill a target pest to complete a fumigation treatment. At the end of a fumigation treatment, the fumigation chamber is flushed with N2 to dilute NO prior to opening the chamber to ambient air to prevent the reaction between NO and O2, which produces NO2 and may damage delicate fresh products. At different times after NO fumigation, NO2 in headspace and nitrate and nitrite in liquid samples were measured as residues. Product quality was evaluated after 2 weeks of post-treatment cold storage to determine effects of NO fumigation on product quality. Keeping O2 from reacting with NO is critical to NO fumigation and is an important part of the protocols. Measuring NO levels is challenging and a practical solution is provided. Possible protocol modifications are also suggested for measuring NO levels in the fumigation chambers as well as residues. NO fumigation has the potential to be a practical alternative to methyl bromide fumigation for postharvest pest control on fresh and stored products. This publication is intended to assist other researchers in conducting NO fumigation research for postharvest pest control and accelerating the development of NO fumigation for practical applications.