Science Education
>

Procedures of Laboratory Fumigation for Pest Control with Nitric Oxide Gas

PREPARAÇÃO DO INSTRUTOR
CONCEITOS
PROTOCOLO DO ALUNO
JoVE Journal
Ambiente
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Journal Ambiente
Procedures of Laboratory Fumigation for Pest Control with Nitric Oxide Gas

NOTE: Nitric oxide fumigation of fresh products starts by establishing ultralow oxygen conditions in fumigation chambers, followed by injection of NO and holding the fumigation chambers at certain temperatures for the duration of a specific treatment, and then is terminated by flushing with N2 to dilute NO prior to opening the fumigation chambers as illustrated (Figure 3). For measurements of NO2 in the head space of fumigation chambers and nitrate and nitrite in liquid samples using the Model 405 nm NO2/NO/NOx monitor and NOA nitric oxide analyzer, please refer to the user manuals from the manufacturers for detailed operation procedures.

Caution: Nitric oxide is a strong oxidizing agent and will react with oxygen spontaneously to produce nitrogen dioxide. Both nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide are toxic. Please refer to their MSDS for safe handling and use. For personal safety, all steps of small scale fumigation experiments involving handling and potential exposure to NO or NO2 should be carried out in a fume hood. A personal NO2 alarm should be used to conduct large scale NO fumigation experiments.

1. Preparation of Materials and Instruments

  1. Instruments, parts, and materials needed for NO fumigation
    1. Make a foil bag with a tubing outlet for NO.
      1. Seal the opening of a foil bag around a Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tube using a heat sealer.
      2. Then use epoxy glue to seal the seams and joint around the Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tube to produce the foil bag.
      3. Add a stopcock at the end of the tube.
        NOTE: Foil bags with tubing are not commercially available. But they can be made easily in the lab with foil bags from commercial sources using a heat sealer.
        NOTE: Nitrogen: Regular industry nitrogen in compressed cylinders has a purity of ≥99.99% and is suitable for NO fumigation. Two or more cylinders with regulators can be set to have different outlet pressures and connected together. The cylinder with the higher outlet pressure will be used up first before the cylinder with the lower outlet pressure will be used. This will be useful in large fumigation tests.
    2. Airtight fumigation chambers.
      NOTE: Airtightness is critical to NO fumigation because NO will react with O2 leaked into the chamber. This will reduce available NO for pest control and also produce NO2 which may damage fresh products.
      1. Glass jar chambers: Grease the rim of the lid lightly with petroleum jelly. Then seal the jar with the lid that has two outlets after loading objects such as insect infested products into the jar.
        NOTE: Each lid of the jar has two outlets and one of the outlets has a plastic tube extended to the bottom of the jar to increase the efficiency of air replacement.
      2. Chambers made of pressure cookers: Grease the rim of the chamber with petroleum jelly. Load products and insects in the chamber and seal it with the lid.
      3. Large fumigation chambers: Grease the gasket lightly with petroleum jelly. Then load products in the chamber. Close the door. Tighten the clamps if necessary to maintain an airtight seal.
        NOTE: NO gas is highly volatile, so there is no need to have a fan in a fumigation chamber to keep air in the chamber mixed.

2. Establishment of ULO Conditions in Fumigation Chambers

  1. Connect a chamber to the N2 line and an O2 analyzer.
    NOTE: A T-connector with one end goes to the analyzer and the other end equipped with a one-way check valve can be used to release air to avoid high flow to the O2 analyzer.
  2. Release N2 through a flowmeter to flush the chamber to remove oxygen.
  3. Reduce N2 flow rate to 0.5 – 1 L/min when O2 level is close to 30 ppm.

3. Injection of NO Gas

  1. Fill the foil bag with NO gas.
    1. Fill the bag with N2 first and then vacuum the air out to wash out O2 from the bag.
    2. Then release NO gas into the bag in a fume hood.
    3. Hang the bag in a fume hood to be used for NO fumigation.
      NOTE: After prolonged usage, the bag can become degraded and the tubing can become brittle due to the corrosive effects of NO2. So, the bags will need to be replaced periodically.
  2. Inject NO into fumigation chambers.
    1. Wash the syringe and attached tubing with N2 to flush out O2.
    2. Take a NO sample from the NO foil bag and inject it into fumigation chambers.
    3. After injection, flush the syringe and attached tubing with N2.
    4. Place fumigation chambers at 2 °C for the duration of the fumigation treatment.

4. Measure NO Concentration in a Fumigation Chamber

NOTE: NO concentrations in fumigation for pest control may range from 2,000 ppm (0.2%) to 50,000 ppm (5%). This range is "out of range" of current NO monitors. But, NO levels can still be measured in diluted samples or by using a dilution device.

  1. Small chamber fumigations
    1. Dilute air samples from treatment jars at the end of fumigation:
      1. Establish ULO conditions at ≤30 ppm O2 in jars.
      2. Take gas samples from treatment jars to inject them into the ULO jars.
    2. Measure NO and NO2 levels in the diluted samples by circulating the air through a flue gas monitor.
  2. Large chamber fumigations: The procedures are illustrated in Figure 4.
    1. Set up a dilution system.
    2. Measure NO and NO2 levels.
      1. Turn on the flue gas monitor and flush it with N2.
      2. Turn on the sample gas flow to measure NO and NO2 levels.
      3. Finish the measurement by turning off the sample gas flow.

5. Terminate NO Fumigation

  1. Fumigation of insects only
    1. Place fumigation chambers in a fume hood.
    2. Open the chambers.
    3. Retrieve insects for mortality evaluation.
      NOTE: Insects are typically held in an environmental chamber overnight after fumigation to allow all live insects to recover before being scored for mortality.
  2. Fumigation of fresh products
    1. Move fumigation chambers into a fume hood (for small chambers).
    2. Flush the fumigation chambers with N2 to allow a specific number air exchange.
    3. Monitor NO level at the exhaust port.
      NOTE: The flue gas monitor can be used to monitor NO levels during the N2 flush. Typically, we flush fumigation chambers to reduce the NO level below 200 ppm before opening the chambers to ambient air.
    4. Retrieve insects for mortality evaluation (if insects are included).
    5. Store fumigated products for residue analysis and post-treatment quality evaluation.
      NOTE: Allow fumigated products enough time in the fume hood for NO and NO2 to dissipate before moving them for storage. Fumigated products are usually stored at a low temperature together with controls in a cooler for a certain period before being evaluated for postharvest quality and possible injuries.

6. Residue Analysis

  1. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) measurement using a 405 nm NO2/NO/NOX monitor
    1. Turn on and allow the 405 nm NO2/NO/NOX monitor to warm up for 20 – 30 min.
    2. Close the fumigation chamber containing the product.
      NOTE: After fumigation, fumigation chambers were open and placed at a certain temperature to allow NO2 to dissipate. At the time when NO2 release is measured, seal the chamber airtight with a lid with two ports equipped with stopcocks. A temperature of 20 °C was used in the procedure demonstration.
    3. Connect the NO2 monitor to the chamber to circulate the air through the NO2 monitor.
    4. Immediately start logging data on the NO2 monitor and collect data for 1 min.
    5. Disconnect the chamber from the monitor and keep the chamber sealed.
      NOTE: Data logging can be started either via MENU -> Dat -> Log on the NO2 monitor, or via the graphing Software on a computer.
    6. Keep the sealed chambers at 20 °C for 1 h, then repeat the data collection step.
      NOTE: The time interval can be adjusted depending on the release rate of NO2 from fumigated products.
    7. Calculate the difference between the two NO2 concentrations and convert the data to mg/kg/h.
  2. Nitrate and nitrite measurements with a GE Sievers 280i NO Analyzer
    NOTE: Please refer to the manual of the manufacturer and the paper21 by Yang and Liu (2017) for detailed information.
    1. Sample preparation
      1. Homogenize product samples in a blender.
      2. Transfer 15 g of the homogenized sample from the blender into a vial.
      3. Add 100 mL of distilled H2O to settle for 10 mins in the vial.
      4. Filter the sample and store the filtered solution at 2 °C until use.
    2. Reducing agent preparation for nitrate measurement with nitric oxide analyzer
      NOTE: Please refer to the manual of the manufacturer for detailed information.
      1. Add 0.8 g of vanadium chloride (VCl3) in a flask.
      2. Slowly add 100 mL of 1 M hydrochloride acid (HCl) in the flask with the VCl3, cap the flask, and swirl several times.
      3. Filter the solution using filter paper and a funnel and seal the filtered solution bottle with aluminum foil and store it in a refrigerator.
    3. Measurement of both nitrate and nitrite with nitric oxide analyzer
      NOTE: Please refer to the manual of the manufacturer for detailed information.
      1. Preheat the water bath to 95 °C. Add 4 – 6 mL of nitrate reducing agent into a purge vessel and adjust the inert gas flow rate to a proper level.
        NOTE: The inert gas was He. N2 gas can also be used.
      2. Inject 5 µL of sample solution using a syringe into the purge vessel.
      3. Proceed to the next sample injection when the sample peak is finished.
    4. Nitrite measurement with nitric oxide analyzer
      NOTE: Please refer to the manual of the manufacturer for detailed information.
      1. Adjust the valve on the purge vessel to have 1 – 2 psi pressure for the inert gas.
      2. Add 4 – 6 mL of concentrated acetic acid to fill the first bulb of the purge vessel.
      3. Weigh 50 mg of sodium iodide (NaI) and dissolve it in 1 – 2 mL H2O.
      4. Add the NaI solution to the purge vessel and allow mixing for 1 – 2 minutes.
      5. Increase the inert gas flow rate to a proper level.
      6. Inject 5 µL of sample solution using a syringe into the purge vessel.
      7. Proceed to the next sample injection when sample peak is finished.

7. Postharvest Quality Evaluation of Fruit and Vegetables

NOTE: Product injuries from NO fumigation may show up immediately after fumigation (Figure 5). However, product quality is usually evaluated after 1 – 2 weeks of post-treatment cold storage. Symptoms of injuries will progress over time and can be better identified in quality evaluation. Procedures for evaluating different fresh products may differ substantially. Only procedures for evaluating lettuce quality are demonstrated here as an example using established procedures5.

  1. Remove lettuce from cold storage two weeks after fumigation. Remove wraps and inspect surfaces for stains and discoloration for all treatments including controls.
  2. Score and record external visual quality for all treatments based on established procedures8.
  3. Cut lettuce into halves and inspect any stains and discolorations for all treatments.
  4. Score and record internal visual quality scores for all treatments.

Procedures of Laboratory Fumigation for Pest Control with Nitric Oxide Gas

Learning Objectives

Nitric oxide fumigation for fresh products needs to be terminated with an N2 flush to dilute NO before opening fumigation chambers to expose products to ambient air. When a fumigation treatment is terminated by directly opening the chamber to ambient air without an N2 flush, the reaction between NO and O2 will result in NO2 production and exposure of fresh products to NO2 often results in injuries including brown stains, discoloration, and dead tissue spots8. Delicate vegetables and fruits such as lettuce, zucchini, and pears are prone to damage by NO2. When NO fumigation is terminated properly with an N2 flush, the fumigation treatment has been demonstrated to be safe without any injuries to product quality (Figure 6 and Figure 7). In fact, NO fumigation for pest control has been found to enhance postharvest quality of fresh products as compared with unfumigated controls as demonstrated on strawberries. Strawberries fumigated with NO for control of western flower thrips retain a brighter and richer color and are also less soft one week after fumigation as compared with the control8. Lettuce heads wrapped in plastic sleeves may sustain injuries to surface leaves directly underneath ventilation holes of the wraps due to reaction of NO with O2 to produce NO2 if fumigation is not terminated properly.

Flushing with N2 at the end of NO fumigation affected NO2 release from fumigated products. When NO fumigation was terminated with N2 flush, there were no significant differences in NO2 release rate between the treatment and the control. NO fumigation treatment flushed with air at the end of fumigation, however, had a higher NO2 release rate as compared with the control and the release of NO2 declined over time.

For most fresh products including lettuce, broccoli, strawberry, apple, orange, etc., there were no significant differences in NO3 or NO2 levels between the treatment that was terminated with an N2 flush and the control. Only when NO fumigation treatment was terminated by flushing with normal air, there were significantly higher NO3 and NO2 concentrations in all fumigated products than both control and N2 flushed fumigated products. NO2 concentration was generally not detectable in both fumigated and control products (Table 1 and Table 2). Therefore, there were no significant levels of residues from NO fumigated fresh products at 24 h after fumigation when fumigation was terminated properly with nitrogen flushing.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Effects of NO fumigation on insects and mites. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Demonstration of injuries to lettuce by NO2 from the reaction between NO and O2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Flow chart of NO fumigation procedures. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Method of using a dilution device and a flu gas monitor with NO sensor to measure NO level in a large-scale NO fumigation test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Compare effects of fumigation treatments terminated by N2 flush and air flush on postharvest quality of fresh fruit and vegetables. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6
Figure 6: Postharvest quality of lettuce, broccoli, and apples from three treatments (C, T1, T2) 14 days after fumigation with C, T1, and T2 representing control, fumigation terminated with an N2 flush, and fumigation terminated with air flush, respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7
Figure 7: Postharvest quality of oranges, pears, and peaches from three treatments (C, T1, T2) 14 days after fumigation with C, T1, and T2 representing control, fumigation terminated with an N2 flush, and fumigation terminated with air flush, respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Product  NO (%) Treatment NO3 (mg/100 g) NO2 (mg/100 g)
Apple 5.0 NO-Air      1.60±0.12  a 0.50±0.16  a
NO-N2      1.36±0.13  ab 0.03±0.01  b
Control      0.76±0.28  b 0                 b
Apricot 3.0 NO-Air      1.84±0.14  a 0.21±0.02  a
NO-N2      0.92±0.17  b 0                 b
Control      0.54±0.01  b 0                 b
Asparagus 3.0 NO-Air      2.19±0.13  a 0.08±0.04  a
NO-N2      0.70±0.03  b 0                 a
Control      0.84±0.07  b 0                 a
Blueberry 3.0 NO-Air      2.74±0.46  a 0.14±0.02  a
NO-N2      1.24±0.19  b 0                 b
Control      1.22±0.15  b 0                 b
Broccoli 3.0 NO-Air    18.69±3.75  a 0.17±0.06  a
NO-N2    18.51±3.42  a 0                 b
Control    12.26±2.31  a 0                 b
Cherry 3.0 NO-Air      1.75±0.11  a 0
NO-N2      0.56±0.09  b 0
Control      0.65±0.08  b 0
Garlic 3.0 NO-Air      5.05±0.45  a 0.14±0.02  a
NO-N2      4.45±0.79  a 0                 b
Control      5.01±0.69  a 0                 b
Grape 3.0 NO-Air      6.32±0.68  a 0
NO-N2      2.38±0.43  b 0
Control      2.74±0.25  b 0
Pepper 3.0 NO-Air      9.26±0.35  a 0.71±0.12  a
NO-N2      6.75±0.68  b 0.02±0.01  b
Control      6.23±0.72  b 0                 b
Kiwi 3.0 NO-Air      1.66±0.55  a 0
NO-N2      1.25±0.09  a 0
Control      1.41±0.31  a 0
Lettuce 2.0 NO-Air  112.85±20.17a 7.99±2.02  a
NO-N2    38.97±5.87  b 0.1±0.1      b
Control    40.64±10.81b 0                 b
Orange 3.0 NO-Air      1.22±0.13  a 0.27±0.05  a
NO-N2      1.05±0.05  a 0.02±0.01  b
Control      1.24±0.22  a 0                 b
Plum 3.0 NO-Air      1.04±0.08  a 0
NO-N2      0.63±0.04  b 0
Control      0.84±0.11  ab 0
Strawberry 2.5 NO-Air      6.01±0.62  a 0
NO-N2      5.30±0.77  a 0
Control      6.16±1.06  a 0

Table 1: Nitrate and nitrite levels as residues at 24 h after 16 h nitric oxide fumigation on fresh fruit and vegetables. For each product, values followed by different letters are significantly different based on Tukey HSD multiple range test (P ≤0.05). Reprinted from Yang and Liu (2017).

List of Materials

Nitric oxide gas Praxair UN1660 99.5% purity
Nitrogen gas Praxair UN1066 Industry grade
Fumigation chamber (custom made) Size: 30"x30"x30"; made of stainless steel with rubber gaskit along the rim.  The chamber is sealed by clampdown its lid to the vaseline greased gaskit. The chamber has multiple ports for flushing the chamber and for taking air samples.
Nitric Oxide Analyzer GE Scientific NOA 280i analyzer Measure NO plus NO2, Nitrate and nitrite
Model 405nm NO2/NO/Nox monitor 2B Technologies Inc Ranges: NO (0-2ppm), NO2+NO (0-10ppm)
Kane 900+ gas monitor Kane International With NO, NO2, CO, O2 sensors
Flowmeter and controllers Omega Engineering Flow ranges: 0-1, 0-5, 0-20 LPM
Tubing, connectors, stopcocks Cole-Parmer Tubing: nylon and teflon, sizes: 1/8" and 5/32" (4mm); They fit to connectors and stockcocks 
Oxygen analyzer Illinois Instruments Model 810 Ziconia sensor, sensitivity: 0.1ppm, range: 0-100%
NO2 personal alarm SENSIT Technologies Sensit P100 Should be used in conducting large scale NO fumigations outside a fume hood
Flowmeter and controllers Omega Engineering Flow ranges: 0-1, 0-5, 0-20 LPM
Gastight syringes SGE Analytical Science 10 ml, 100 ml
Gastight syringes Hamilton Company 10uL
Tubing, connectors, stopcocks Cole-Parmer Tubing: nylon and teflon, sizes: 1/8" and 5/32" (4mm); They fit to connectors and stockcocks 
Sodium Iodide Fisher Chemical S324-100
Acetic acid, Glacial Fisher Chemical UN2789 ≥99.7% purity
Hydrochloric acid Cole-Parmer SA48-500 1.0 Normal
Vanadium(III) Chloride Acros Organics 197000250 97% purity
Sodium Hydroxide Fisher Chemical BPSS266-1 1 M
SAHARA S3 Stainless-steel heated bath circulator ThermoFisher Scientific
SC 100 Digiital Imersion Circulator ThermoFisher Scientific
Oxygen Praxair *001043 99.5-100% purity
Hot Jaw Sorbent Systems Mylar bag heat sealer
Mylar bags Sorbent Systems
Flipmate filtration assemblies Cole-Parmer EW-35202-29
15 ml polypropylane tube Falcon
Filter Paper P5 Fisher Scientific
Blender Waring Blender 7010G Model WF2211212
Dilution device Made in our lab Combine the ends of four equal length Teflon microtubing into one connector and have a connector for each end of the four microtubing.

Preparação do Laboratório

Nitric oxide (NO) is a newly discovered fumigant for postharvest pest control. This paper provides detailed protocols for conducting NO fumigation on fresh products and procedures for residue analysis and product quality evaluation. An airtight fumigation chamber containing fresh fruit and vegetables is first flushed with nitrogen (N2) to establish an ultralow oxygen (ULO) environment followed by injection of NO. The fumigation chamber is then kept at a low temperature of 2 – 5 °C for a specified time period necessary to kill a target pest to complete a fumigation treatment. At the end of a fumigation treatment, the fumigation chamber is flushed with N2 to dilute NO prior to opening the chamber to ambient air to prevent the reaction between NO and O2, which produces NO2 and may damage delicate fresh products. At different times after NO fumigation, NO2 in headspace and nitrate and nitrite in liquid samples were measured as residues. Product quality was evaluated after 2 weeks of post-treatment cold storage to determine effects of NO fumigation on product quality. Keeping O2 from reacting with NO is critical to NO fumigation and is an important part of the protocols. Measuring NO levels is challenging and a practical solution is provided. Possible protocol modifications are also suggested for measuring NO levels in the fumigation chambers as well as residues. NO fumigation has the potential to be a practical alternative to methyl bromide fumigation for postharvest pest control on fresh and stored products. This publication is intended to assist other researchers in conducting NO fumigation research for postharvest pest control and accelerating the development of NO fumigation for practical applications.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a newly discovered fumigant for postharvest pest control. This paper provides detailed protocols for conducting NO fumigation on fresh products and procedures for residue analysis and product quality evaluation. An airtight fumigation chamber containing fresh fruit and vegetables is first flushed with nitrogen (N2) to establish an ultralow oxygen (ULO) environment followed by injection of NO. The fumigation chamber is then kept at a low temperature of 2 – 5 °C for a specified time period necessary to kill a target pest to complete a fumigation treatment. At the end of a fumigation treatment, the fumigation chamber is flushed with N2 to dilute NO prior to opening the chamber to ambient air to prevent the reaction between NO and O2, which produces NO2 and may damage delicate fresh products. At different times after NO fumigation, NO2 in headspace and nitrate and nitrite in liquid samples were measured as residues. Product quality was evaluated after 2 weeks of post-treatment cold storage to determine effects of NO fumigation on product quality. Keeping O2 from reacting with NO is critical to NO fumigation and is an important part of the protocols. Measuring NO levels is challenging and a practical solution is provided. Possible protocol modifications are also suggested for measuring NO levels in the fumigation chambers as well as residues. NO fumigation has the potential to be a practical alternative to methyl bromide fumigation for postharvest pest control on fresh and stored products. This publication is intended to assist other researchers in conducting NO fumigation research for postharvest pest control and accelerating the development of NO fumigation for practical applications.

Procedimento

Nitric oxide (NO) is a newly discovered fumigant for postharvest pest control. This paper provides detailed protocols for conducting NO fumigation on fresh products and procedures for residue analysis and product quality evaluation. An airtight fumigation chamber containing fresh fruit and vegetables is first flushed with nitrogen (N2) to establish an ultralow oxygen (ULO) environment followed by injection of NO. The fumigation chamber is then kept at a low temperature of 2 – 5 °C for a specified time period necessary to kill a target pest to complete a fumigation treatment. At the end of a fumigation treatment, the fumigation chamber is flushed with N2 to dilute NO prior to opening the chamber to ambient air to prevent the reaction between NO and O2, which produces NO2 and may damage delicate fresh products. At different times after NO fumigation, NO2 in headspace and nitrate and nitrite in liquid samples were measured as residues. Product quality was evaluated after 2 weeks of post-treatment cold storage to determine effects of NO fumigation on product quality. Keeping O2 from reacting with NO is critical to NO fumigation and is an important part of the protocols. Measuring NO levels is challenging and a practical solution is provided. Possible protocol modifications are also suggested for measuring NO levels in the fumigation chambers as well as residues. NO fumigation has the potential to be a practical alternative to methyl bromide fumigation for postharvest pest control on fresh and stored products. This publication is intended to assist other researchers in conducting NO fumigation research for postharvest pest control and accelerating the development of NO fumigation for practical applications.

Tags