Here, we describe a simple method that combines RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH) with immunofluorescence to visualize severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA. This protocol may increase understanding of the molecular characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-host interactions at a single-cell level.
This manuscript provides a protocol for in situ hybridization chain reaction (HCR) coupled with immunofluorescence to visualize severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in cell line and three-dimensional (3D) cultures of human airway epithelium. The method allows highly specific and sensitive visualization of viral RNA by relying on HCR initiated by probe localization. Split-initiator probes help amplify the signal by fluorescently labeled amplifiers, resulting in negligible background fluorescence in confocal microscopy. Labeling amplifiers with different fluorescent dyes facilitates the simultaneous recognition of various targets. This, in turn, allows the mapping of the infection in tissues to better understand viral pathogenesis and replication at the single-cell level. Coupling this method with immunofluorescence may facilitate better understanding of host-virus interactions, including alternation of the host epigenome and immune response pathways. Owing to sensitive and specific HCR technology, this protocol can also be used as a diagnostic tool. It is also important to remember that the technique may be modified easily to enable detection of any RNA, including non-coding RNAs and RNA viruses that may emerge in the future.
SARS-CoV-2 is a novel human betacoronavirus that emerged at the end of 2019, causing an unprecedented pandemic a few months later. Because the virus is new to science, much of its biology and its impact on host cells remain unknown. Therefore, mapping the virus-cell and -tissue tropism during infection is important if its basic biological characteristics and its effects on the host are to be understood. Several techniques are used to examine virus-host interplay including biochemical, biological, and physical assays. In situ hybridization is a common method that employs labeled complementary DNA, RNA, or modified nucleic acid probes, which localize to specific DNA or RNA sequences in a cell or tissue.
A new RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH) method has been developed that incorporates modifications to increase sensitivity by amplifying the signal-to-noise ratio via an HCR1. HCR allows the study of RNA localization at a single-cell level. Owing to its high specificity, sensitivity, and resolution, this method is useful not only for basic science studies, but also for applicatory projects, e.g., diagnostics. Recently, the feasibility of this method was demonstrated for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA localized to ciliated cells within fully differentiated 3D human airway epithelium (HAE) cultures2. HAE cultures constitute one of the most advanced tools used to study viral infection in the context of the "natural infection" microenvironment3,4.
Several reports on human coronaviruses (HCoV), including SARS-CoV-2, highlight the importance of epigenetic modifications with respect to HCoV infection and pathophysiology [reviewed in 5], e.g., the methylation pattern of the gene encoding the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor6,7. Interestingly, mass-spectrometric screening identified several epigenetic factors that interact with the SARS-CoV-2 proteome8. More specifically, nonstructural protein 5 (NSP5) binds to the epigenetic regulator, histone deacetylase 2, and the catalytically inactive NSP5 (C145A) interacts with tRNA methyltransferase 1 (24). Additionally, NSP16 methyltransferase activity is blocked by the methyltransferase inhibitor, sinefungin9. However, the exact role of these epigenetic factors in COVID-19 remains unclear. Replication of HCoV takes place in the cytoplasm of the infected cell, and triggers inflammatory responses that are regulated by epigenetic modifications10.
For instance, HCoV-229E fine-tunes nuclear factor-kappa B signaling and profoundly reprograms the host cellular chromatin landscape by increasing acetylation of H3K36 and H4K5 in certain regions11. The Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus infection increases levels of H3K27me3 and depletes H3K4me3 at the promoter regions of subsets of specific interferon-sensitive genes12. Additionally, viral RNA triggers cell immune responses, as demonstrated for flaviviruses13, retroviruses14,15, and coronaviruses16. The epigenetic markers on viral RNA may play a role in recognition by cellular sensors, as shown for m7A methylation of human immunodeficiency virus-1 RNA17. However, questions remain: What is the impact of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on the immune response, and are epigenetic marks involved?
Here, an optimized RNA-FISH method coupled with immunofluorescence analysis of cell lines and 3D tissues (fully differentiated HAE) has been described. Although cytological methods, such as FISH and immunofluorescence, are used widely, this new-generation in situ hybridization method based on HCR has never been used for virus detection (except in a recent publication)2. In general, immunostaining and FISH require the following steps: permeabilization to enable penetration of probes or antibodies; fixation in which cellular material is fixed and preserved; detection in which antibodies or nucleic acid probes are applied; and finally, mounting of the samples for visualization.
Although existing protocols share these general features, they vary markedly with respect to the parameters involved. Here, an optimized, simple, immuno-RNA-FISH protocol has been described to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in HAE cultures and Vero cells. The technique comprises the following steps: (1) fixation of cells with paraformaldehyde; (2) permeabilization with detergent or methanol (MeOH); (3) rehydration through a graded series of MeOH solutions (HAE cultures only); (4) detection; (5) amplification using HCR technology to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA; (6) immunostaining; and (7) imaging under a confocal microscope.
1. Buffer preparation
2. Target definition, probes, and amplifiers
3. Cell culture and infection with SARS-CoV-2
4. SARS-CoV-2 RNA-FISH in Vero cells cultured on coverslips
DAY 1
5. SARS-CoV-2 RNA-FISH in HAE cultures
DAY 1
DAY 2
6. Immunofluorescence analysis of Vero cells and HAE cultures
NOTE: Perform the immunofluorescence assay on day 3 for cell lines or day 4 for HAE cultures. Use a different approach for each model. All differences are indicated clearly.
7. Confocal microscopy
The immuno-RNA-FISH protocol described in this manuscript was carried out using two cellular systems: a Vero cell line and a 3D HAE culture. The major steps for both cellular models are shown in Table 2. The RNA-FISH protocol for visualization of SARS-CoV-2 in HAE cultures includes steps that are typical for tissue samples, i.e., permeabilization with 100% MeOH and rehydration through a graded series of MeOH-PBS and 0.1% Tween solutions. Immunofluorescence was performed after RNA-FISH was complete. Zstack images were acquired and processed.
Figure 1 shows immuno RNA FISH in mock-inoculated control Vero cells or cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. Figure 2 shows immuno RNA FISH in mock-inoculated control HAE cultures or cultures infected with SARS-CoV-2. Figure 3 shows optimization of the permeabilization protocol in Vero cells: 70% ethanol overnight at -20 °C or 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS for 5 min at RT. Permeabilization with detergent results in a clear, specific signal for SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA, whereas using ethanol results in a blurry unfocused image.
Figure 1: Immuno-RNA-FISH to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA and β-tubulin in Vero cells. Localization of SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA in (A) infected and (B) mock-inoculated Vero cells. Viral RNA was visualized by FISH (red). β-tubulin is stained with antibodies against mouse β5tubulin (1:100, overnight incubation at 4 °C) and with Alexa fluorophore 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:400, 1 h incubation at RT).Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Each image is a single confocal plane. Scale bar = 20 µm. Abbreviations: SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization; DAPI = 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Human airway epithelial cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. Localization of SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA in (A) infected and (B) mock-inoculated HAE cultures. Viral RNA was visualized by FISH (red). Ciliated cells are visualized using antibodies against mouse β5-tubulin (1:100, overnight incubation at 4 °C) and with Alexa fluorophore 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:400, 1 h incubation at RT). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Each image represents a max projection reconstructed from confocal image stacks (thickness = 3 µm). Scale bar = 10 µm. Abbreviations: SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization; HAE = human airway epithelium; DAPI = 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Optimization of permeabilization conditions for Vero cells. Permeabilization of Vero cells with (A) 70% ethanol and (B) with 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS. Permeabilization with detergent results in a clear specific signal for SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA, whereas ethanol results in a blurry image. Viral RNA is shown in red. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Each image represents a max projection reconstructed from confocal image stacks (thickness = 3 µm). Scale bar = 10 µm. Abbreviations: SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; PBS = phosphate-buffered saline; DAPI = 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplemental Figure 1: SARS-CoV-2 N gene sequence (5'-3') Please click here to download this file.
Buffer | Volume of methanol [mL] | Volume of PBST [mL] |
75% MeOH/25% PBST | 75 | 25 |
50% MeOH/50% PBST | 50 | 50 |
25% MeOH/75% PBST | 25 | 75 |
100% PBST | 0 | 100 |
Total | 100 mL |
Table 1: Preparation of gradient methanol/PBST solutions for rehydration. To rehydrate human airway epithelium samples after overnight incubation in absolute methanol (MeOH), a slow exchange of the environment is necessary. To do this, slow exchange must occur by incubating with buffers in which the proportions of MeOH and PBST (0.1% Tween-20 in 1x phosphate-buffered saline) change gradually. Reagent volumes sufficient to prepare 100 mL of each solution, enough to perform several experiments, are listed.
Module | Step | Vero cells | HAE cultures |
RNA Fluorescence in situ hybridization (RNA FISH) | Fixation | (3.7% PFA) 10-40 min at room temperature or overnight at room temperature | |
Permeabilization | (PBST: 0.1% Tween-20 in 1x PBS) 10 min at room temperature | (0.1% Tween-20 in 1x PBS) 2 × 5 min at room temperature | |
(100% MeOH) overnight at -20 °C | |||
Rehydration | (Graded methanol (MeOH)/PBST) 5 x 5 min, 50% 5x SSCT/PBST wash 5 min, 5x SSCT wash 5 min on ice | ||
Detection (pre-hybridization) | (Probe hybridization buffer) 30 min at 37 °C, 200-300 µL | (Probe hybridization buffer) 5 min on ice, then 30 min at 37 °C, 100 µL | |
Detection | (Probe solution) 12-18 h at 37 °C, 30 – 50 µL | (Probe solution) 12-18 h at 37 °C, 100 µL | |
Probe washings | (Probe wash buffer) 4 x 5 min | (Probe wash buffer) 4 x 15 min | |
(5 × SSCT) 2 x 5 min | |||
Amplification (pre-amplification) | (Amplification buffer) 30 min at room temperature, 200-300 µL | (Amplification buffer) 30 min at room temperature, 100 µL | |
Amplification | (Amplifiers solution) 12-18 h at room temperature in dark place, 30-50 µL | (Amplifiers solution) 12-18 h at room temperature in dark place, 100 µL | |
Amplifiers washing | (5x SSCT) 5 x 5 min | (5x SSCT) 2 x 5 min, 2 x 15 min, 1 x 5 min | |
ImmunoFluorescence (IF) | Blocking | (1% BSA in PBST) 30 min at 37 °C | |
Primary antibody incubation | (Antibody solution of apropriate concentration in blocking solution) 2 h at room temperature / overnight at 4 °C, 30-50 µL | (Antibody solution of apropriate concentration in blocking solution) 2 h at room temperature / overnight at 4 °C, 100 µL | |
Primary antibody washing | (PBST) 3 x 5 min at room temperature | ||
Secondary antibody incubation | (Antibody solution of apropriate concentration in blocking solution) 1 h at 37 °C, 30-50 µL | (Antibody solution of appropriate concentration in blocking solution) 1 h at 37 °C, 100 µL | |
Secondary antibody washing | (PBST) 3 x 5 min at room temperature | ||
Nuclear staining | (DAPI solution) 10 min at room temperature, then 2 x 5 min with 1x PBS |
Table 2: Workflow of the Immuno-RNA-FISH protocol in cell lines and HAE cultures. Immuno-RNA-FISH is feasible in both cellular models, but requires different approaches. The main steps are shown, along with the buffers used (in parentheses), followed by the duration and temperature of incubation. In several steps, critical differences in the volume of incubation reagent per sample are given to simplify the calculations. If the volume is not specified, it is selected arbitrarily so that it completely covers the sample (usually 200 µL) with agitation. Abbreviations: FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization; HAE = human airway epithelium; PFA = paraformaldehyde; DAPI = 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; BSA = bovine serum albumin; PBS = phosphate-buffered saline; MeOH = methanol.
Immuno-RNA-FISH is a reliable method for double-staining of RNA and cellular proteins. Here, a modified immuno-RNA-FISH protocol has been described that allows detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and cellular proteins in cell lines and HAE cultures. This protocol can be adapted for use in different cell models including cell monolayers or specific tissues. The method relies on the concept of an HCR initiated by appropriate probe localization. Next, the use of split-initiator probes to begin amplification of the signal by fluorescently labeled amplifiers results in minimal-to-no background fluorescence when observed using a confocal microscope. Amplifiers can be labeled with different fluorescent dyes and are compatible with different probes designed to recognize various targets; therefore, they may be used simultaneously. The procedures described in this protocol are simple, but time-consuming (3-4 days). Nevertheless, the results are characterized by a low noise-to-signal ratio, unlike other protocols that use directly labeled fluorescent probes.
Vero cells and HAE cultures were used here. Different protocols are required for cells on a coverslip and cells in tissue culture. Most of the differences are encountered when handling the cells (whether on coverslip or a membrane) and the amounts of material used. General RNA-FISH protocols require permeabilization using ethanol or methanol solutions as well as an overnight incubation at -20 °C. Importantly, using detergent for permeabilization is more beneficial for immunofluorescence, shortens the procedure by 1 day, and allows more efficient planning of the experiment. The primary approach was to follow general protocols involving permeabilization with alcohol or detergent to see if any undesirable effects were noticeable. Importantly, overnight permeabilization of Vero cells with 70% ethanol solution resulted in an unspecific, blurred signal; by contrast, permeabilization with Tween20 allowed clear and specific visualization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and shortened the protocol by 1 day (Figure 3).
The same approach was tested on HAE cultures after overnight incubation with absolute methanol at -20 °C (according to general RNA-FISH protocols for tissue samples) and 0.1% Tween20 for 5 min at RT. Incubation with Tween20 resulted in a non-specific signal, which disqualifies this reagent (data not shown). Overnight incubation with methanol led to a highly specific signal with no artifacts. Importantly, detachment of the Transwell membrane was observed because methanol dissolved the glue. This problem was handled by detaching the membrane and proceeding with the coverslip protocol. Classical RNA-FISH procedures use proteinase K to improve sensitivity as this removes proteins and clears RNA-protein complexes, making cells penetrable by chemicals and dyes. The present protocol omitted this step as proteinase K prevents protein staining. No differences were observed in the sensitivity of RNA-FISH when proteinase K was absent (data not shown).
Performing immunofluorescence assays following RNA-FISH did not affect the RNA signal and resulted in successful combination of both methods. Therefore, the complete protocol represents a convenient way of visualizing RNA and its interactions with proteins at the single-cell level. Of note, fixation of cells (required for immuno-RNA-FISH) does not allow time-lapse experiments to examine dynamic events at the single-cell level. Visualization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA allows analysis of SARS-CoV-2 replication within a cell and, when coupled with immunofluorescence, allows the study of intracellular SARS-CoV-2 RNA/host protein interactions including interplay with the epigenome. Finally, this protocol has a wide variety of applications including the detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other emerging viruses at single-cell resolution. Thanks to sensitive and specific HCR technology, it can also be used as a diagnostic tool.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for research on SARS-CoV-2, and by grants from the National Science Center (grants UMO2017/27/B/NZ6/02488 to K.P. and UMO-2018/30/E/NZ1/00874 to A.K.-P.).
Equipment | |||
Confocal Microscope LSM 880 | ZEISS | ||
Grant Bio, Mini Rocker- Shaker | Fisher Scientific | 12965501 | |
Incubator Galaxy170R | New Brunswick | CO170R-230-1000 | |
Thermomixer Comfort | Eppendorf | 5355 000 011 | |
Materials | |||
15 mm x 15 mm NO. 1 coverslips | LabSolute | 7695022 | |
1.5 mL tubes | FL-MEDICAL | 5.350.023.053 | |
12-well plate | TTP | 92412 | |
Conical centrifuge tube | Sarstedt | 5.332.547.254 | |
parafilm | Sigma | P7793-1EA | |
serological pipets | VWR Collection | 612-5523P, 612-5827P | |
slide glass | PTH CHEMLAND | 04-296.202.03 | |
Transwell ThinCerts | Grainer bio-one | 665641 | |
Reagents | |||
Alexa fluorophore 488-conjugated secondary antibodies | Invitrogen | ||
β5-tubulin | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | sc-134234 | |
DAPI | Thermo Scientific | D1306 | |
Disodium phosphate | Sigma | S51136-500G | |
EGTA | BioShop | EGT101.25 | |
HCR Amplification Buffer | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | BAM01522 | Buffer can be also prepared doi:10.1242/dev.165753: Supplementary information |
HCR amplifier B1-h1 Alexa Fluor 647 | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | S013922 | |
HCR amplifier B1-h2 Alexa Fluor 647 | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | S012522 | |
HCR Probe Hybridization Buffer | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | BPH03821 | Buffer can be also prepared doi:10.1242/dev.165753: Supplementary information |
HCR probe set for SARS-CoV-2 Ncapsid | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | PRE134 | |
HCR Probe Wash Buffer | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | BPW01522 | Buffer can be also prepared doi:10.1242/dev.165753: Supplementary information |
HEPES | BioShop | HEP001.100 | |
Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate | Sigma | 63138-250G | |
Methanol | Sigma | 32213-1L-M | |
Monopotassium phosphate | Sigma | P5655-100G | |
Paraformaldehyde | Sigma | P6148-1KG | |
PIPES | BioShop | PIP666.100 | |
Potassium Chloride | Sigma | P5405-250G | |
Prolong Diamond Antifade Mounting Medium | Invitrogen | P36970 | |
Sodium Chloride | BioShop | SOD001.5 | |
Trisodium Citrate 2-hydrate | POCH | 6132-04-3 | |
Tween-20 | BioShop | TWN580.500 | |
Software | |||
Fluorescence Spectraviewer | Modeling spectral parameters | ||
ImageJ Fiji | Acquiring and processing z-stack images |