This video article shows the use of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG)/cancer cell model in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
One way that solid tumors disseminate is through neural invasion. This route is well-known in cancers of the head and neck, prostate, and pancreas. These neurotropic cancer cells have a unique ability to migrate unidirectionally along nerves towards the central nervous system (CNS). The dorsal root ganglia (DRG)/cancer cell model is a three dimensional (3D) in vitro model frequently used for studying the interaction between neural stroma and cancer cells. In this model, mouse or human cancer cell lines are grown in ECM adjacent to preparations of freshly dissociated cultured DRG. In this article, the DRG isolation protocol from mice, and implantation in petri dishes for co-culturing with pancreatic cancer cells are demonstrated. Five days after implantation, the cancer cells made contact with the DRG neurites. Later, these cells formed bridgeheads to facilitate more extensive polarized, neurotropic migration of cancer cells.
Solid tumors disseminate in three main ways: direct invasion, lymphatic spread, and hematogenic spread. However, there is a fourth means of cancer spread that is frequently disregarded, dissemination along nerves. Cancerous neural invasion (CNI) is a well-known route of cancer spread, especially in cancers of the head and neck,1 prostate2, 3 and pancreas.4-8 CNI occurs in more than 80% of individuals with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, leading to retroperitoneal tumor spread through celiac ganglion nerves. These neurotropic cancer cells have a unique ability to migrate unidirectionally along nerves towards the central nervous system (CNS).9 This finding suggests that the perineural microenvironment can be exploited by cancer cells, providing factors that support malignant growth.
One of the few in vitro models for CNI research is the dorsal root ganglia (DRG)/cancer cell model. This model is frequently used for studying the paracrine interaction between neural stroma and cancer cells.10-18 In this model, mouse or human cancer cell lines are grown in extracellular matrix (ECM) adjacent to preparations of freshly dissociated cultured DRG.
This video article shows the application of in vitro CNI in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Four- to six-week-old female C57BL/CJ mice (Harlan, Jerusalem, Israel) were used in the experiment according to the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care specifications. All experimental procedures were done in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Department of Agriculture regulations.
1. Harvesting the Spinal Cord
2. Isolating the Dorsal Root Ganglia (DRG)
3. Implantation in the Petri Dish
4. Data Acquisition, Time-lapse Videomicroscopy
5. Data Analysis
Using video microscopy imaging, the DRG can be seen sprouting neurites 5-7 days after implantation while the cancer cells migrating away from their colonies toward the DRG. By the 7th day after the implantation, the cancer cells come in contact with the neurites (Figure 2).
The Forward migration index of the pancreatic cancer cells used in the protocol is 3-4 fold higher than that of other cell lines (QLL2, B16F) (Figure 3a). Figure 3b presents a representative X and Y coordinate graph, depicting the migration path of a KPC cancer cell in contact with the nerve; time-lapse videomicroscopy analysis showed differences in the forward movement but not velocity between the KPC cells and non-invading cells (Figure 3c-d).
Figure 1: Schematic Illustration of the Protocol Steps. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Cancer Cell Invasion Along the Neurons of the DRG. (a) DRG (top) and cancer cells (bottom) on day 0 after seeding (5X magnification). (b) DRG and cancer cells on day 7 after seeding (5X magnification). (c) Cancer cells migrate along the DRG neuron (arrows). All bars represent 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Neurons Induce CNI. (a) Nerve invasion index of MiaPaCa2 cancer cells , KPC cells, QLL2, and NIH3T3 cells. (b) A coordinate graph depicting the migration path of a KPC cancer cell in contact with the nerve (red) and QLL2 cell (purple). The Y and X coordinates are shown. (n = 12-20 in each group). (c) Analysis of distance from origin of migrating QLL2 cancer cells with axonal contact and (d) KPC cancer cells (n = 20). The direction of migration was constantly toward the nerve ganglion. P values in (a) were calculated by two-sided Student t test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This article presents an in vitro model that recapitulates the cancerous microenvironment in the neural niche, the DRG model. The video demonstrates all the steps starting from recognizing anatomical landmarks such as the DRG in the mouse, its extraction, and finally, its culturing in ECM. Co-culturing the DRG alongside with cancer cells is also presented. There are no other models for in vitro perineural invasion research described in the literature making this model essential for studying the perineural niche microenvironment in vitro.
The protocol presented in the video has two critical steps. First, care should be taken when grasping the nerve adjacent to the DRG body (step 2.7 in the protocol). Grasping or pinching the DRG might cause irreversible mechanical or ischemic damage to the DRG preventing it from growing and sprouting when seeded in the Petri dish. The second critical step is the implantation of the cancer cells in the Petri dish inside the ECM. It is important to seed the cells slowly and with caution, to avoid the floating of cells and their spread over the Petri dish. The aim of the implantation is to localize the cells in one place, to facilitate tracking their movement (distance and direction).
Once established the model microenvironment can be modified according to the tested hypothesis. For instance, adding a third cell culture to the Petri dish (for example, non-cancerous cells) enables the researcher to compare the neurotropic migration capabilities of different cells. Furthermore, the researcher can apply different conditions (i.e., temperature, humidity, soluble factors, etc.) and examine their effect on the cells invasion ability.
The DRG model enables the researcher to study the interaction between cancer cells and nerves. It is also used for time lapse experiments in which morphological changes in the perineural niche are demonstrated in a temporal fashion. Furthermore, the neuroinvasive cells can be subjected to various treatments and their effect on the interaction with neurites of the ganglia can be assessed.
Not every cell line is suitable for the DRG model. They should be cancer cells with the intrinsic ability to invade through nerve and to degrade ECM. Furthermore, note that each cancer cell type has different invasion characteristics and so the time the cells are expected to make contact with the DRG neurites varies. For example, The KPC cells we used need about 7 days to invade through the ECM toward the DRG whereas MiaPaca cells (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells) need only 72-96 hr to make that contact.
A limitation of this model includes the possible incompatibility with human cells. Due to its use of mouse DRG, the mouse-human protein-protein interaction cannot always be demonstrated when human cancer cells are used. Whenever planning to use this model with the two different species, the homology of the examined protein should be tested and if there is high homology the assay is supposed to be suitable for evaluating protein-protein interactions. As well, it should kept in mind that the DRG assay as proposed in this protocol represents the neural microenvironment including other cells, not only neurons (i.e., Schwann cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, etc.). Hence, specific cell populations cannot be tested specifically.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Edith Suss-Toby is thanked for her assistance in the time-lapse microscopy and image analysis. Nofar Rada is thanked for the artistic work.
Equipments: | |||
Operating microscope | Leica | M205 | |
Tiime Lapse System | Zeiss | ||
Forceps | Sigma-Aldrich | F4142 | |
Surgical blade | Sigma-Aldrich | Z309036 | |
Scissors | Sigma-Aldrich | S3271 | |
35mm petri dishes, glass bottom | de groot | 60-627860 | |
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Materials: | |||
70% ethanol | sigma | ||
Cold PBS | Biological industries | 02-023-1A | |
DMEM | Biological industries | 01-055-1A | |
FCS | Rhenium | 10108165 | |
Penicillin and streptomycin | Biological industries | 01-031-1B | |
Sodium Pyruvate | Biological industries | 03-042-1B | |
L-Glutamine | Biological industries | 03-020-1B | |
Growth factor depleted matrigel | Trevigen | 3433-005-01 |