In this report we describe a method to crush mouse sciatic nerve. This method uses readily available hemostatic forceps and easily and reproducibly produces complete sciatic nerve crush. In addition, we describe a method to prepare muscle whole mounts suitable for analysis of nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve crush.
Regeneration in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is widely studied both for its relevance to human disease and to understand the robust regenerative response mounted by PNS neurons thereby possibly illuminating the failures of CNS regeneration1. Sciatic nerve crush (axonotmesis) is one of the most common models of peripheral nerve injury in rodents2. Crushing interrupts all axons but Schwann cell basal laminae are preserved so that regeneration is optimal3,4. This allows the investigator to study precisely the ability of a growing axon to interact with both the Schwann cell and basal laminae4. Rats have generally been the preferred animal models for experimental nerve crush. They are widely available and their lesioned sciatic nerve provides a reasonable approximation of human nerve lesions5,4. Though smaller in size than rat nerve, the mouse nerve has many similar qualities. Most importantly though, mouse models are increasingly valuable because of the wide availability of transgenic lines now allows for a detailed dissection of the individual molecules critical for nerve regeneration6, 7. Prior investigators have used multiple methods to produce a nerve crush or injury including simple angled forceps, chilled forceps, hemostatic forceps, vascular clamps, and investigator-designed clamps8,9,10,11,12. Investigators have also used various methods of marking the injury site including suture, carbon particles and fluorescent beads13,14,1. We describe our method to obtain a reproducibly complete sciatic nerve crush with accurate and persistent marking of the crush-site using a fine hemostatic forceps and subsequent carbon crush-site marking. As part of our description of the sciatic nerve crush procedure we have also included a relatively simple method of muscle whole mount we use to subsequently quantify regeneration.
1. Animal Subjects
1.1. Treatment
1.2. Surgical Preparation
2. Reproducible Sciatic Nerve Crush
3. Post-Operative Care
4. Semi-Thin Preparation
5. Whole Mount Muscle Preparation
6. Measuring Regeneration
7. Representative Results
Figure 1. Schematic of hind limb anatomy important to nerve crush. A. A semi-circular skin incision has been made revealing the underlying musculature. B. The gluteal musculature has been separated, and the sciatic nerve revealed (step 2.4 above). An arrow denotes the approximate crush site. Retractor placement is shown as a general guide, and is adjusted during each surgery to ease visualization of the sciatic and approach of the hemostatic forceps for crush. B (inset): Placement of the sciatic on the lower jaw of the hemostatic forceps just before crush (step 2.5 above). Separate fascicles are labeled to demonstrate that they are adjacent horizontally, but not vertically, during the crush. Although three fascicles are labeled in this diagram, one may also see a fourth fascicle, the articular branch of the peroneal. For a more detailed anatomical drawing of the branching patterns of the sciatic nerve fascicles distal to the crush point, please refer to Greene’s Anatomy of the Rat, Figure 18817.
Figure 2. A carbon-marked crush site in situ and toluidine blue-stained, semi-thin sections of crushed sciatic nerve. A. An example of a crush site in situ (left hind limb). Black carbon denotes the crush site. The asterisk marks a branch of the tibial nerve that innervates thigh musculature and serves as a useful landmark during crush surgery. The tibial division of the sciatic nerve is outlined in blue, the peroneal in green, and the sural in yellow. B. Semi-thin sections demonstrating a complete crush performed with hemostatic forceps. C. Semi-thin sections demonstrating an incomplete crush performed with angled forceps. In both images degenerating myelin profiles are marked with arrowheads. In panel C arrows mark examples of preserved myelin profiles and a cluster of spared axons. Scale bar is 10 μm.
Figure 3. Whole mount muscle schematic and representative NMJs. A-C: Rendered images of EDL (A), peroneus longus (B), and soleus (C) muscles after removal from hind limb. Muscles shown are from right hind limb. Knee and ankle anatomical orientation are also included for reference. Tendons are colored white and outlined in a solid black line when positioned on top of the muscle. They are outlined in a black dashed line when they extend beneath the muscle. Cuts are shown in red dashed lines. Muscle is peeled away from cut sites, as indicated by blue arrows, and subsequently thinned. After thinning, the muscle is separated from the pins by cutting around what remains of the pinned tendons. D-F: Rendered images from whole mount muscles after removal of connective tissue and subsequent thinning. The endplate bands are outlined on each muscle. G-H: Soleus whole mount muscle fourteen days after sciatic nerve crush demonstrating re-innervated (G) and denervated (H) neuromuscular junctions. In these panels, NMJs, axons, and Schwann cells are visualized as described above in section 5.5.1. Acetylcholine receptors are red, axons green, and Schwann cell processes blue. In panel G, the arrows indicate areas of the NMJ that have been re-innervated by an axon. In panel H arrowheads indicate GAP-43 positive Schwann cell processes. Note the absence of axons. Scale bar is 10 μm.
We have presented a method to obtain a reliably complete sciatic nerve crush with precise marking of the crush site. As previously mentioned, sciatic nerve crush is a common model of peripheral nerve injury in mice and rats. Although each method of crush has its advantages and disadvantages, we found this method produced a complete crush that was easily marked with a minimum of special equipment (e.g. special clamps, etc).
Crush Methods
The most common instrument used for mouse sciatic nerve crush is the No. 5 angled forceps. While it is possible to obtain a complete crush using this method, we found that this instrument produced a variable crush (too little force leaving spared axons or too great tearing the nerve), especially in the hands of a new user.
Other less common methods used to produce crush include small aneurysm clips, forceps chilled in liquid nitrogen, and specially manufactured, calibrated, non-serrated clamps 9,12,5,7. Each of these instruments can reliably produce a complete crush. We chose hemostatic forceps because the instrument is easy to obtain, produces a reliable crush, and allows for clear marking of the crush site. One drawback of the hemostatic forceps is that we cannot readily measure the force produced during crush. However, once tested, a hemostatic forceps will reliably produce a complete crush, and can easily be replaced by an identical forceps if the forceps become damaged.
No matter the method chosen to perform a crush, perhaps the most critical part of the crush procedure is to verify completeness of nerve crush. This is especially important in the hands of a novel user. Semi-thin analysis of nerve distal to the injury site (Figure 2) provides a straightforward method to do so and can reveal a complete crush (Figure 2, panel B) or an incomplete crush (Figure 2, panel C).
The final consideration in the crush method is the duration of the crush. We tested crush durations from 15 seconds to 60 seconds of total crush time, with no difference in translucence of the nerve or preservation of myelinated fibers. This is consistent with the observations of Bridge and colleagues, who compared crushes of 15-60 second duration in the rat sciatic nerve using a jeweler’s forceps and found no significant morphological, histological, electrophysiological, or functional differences between different crush durations18. However, longer crush times or crushes that significantly degrade the Schwann cell endoneurium will alter the rate and/or success of regeneration.
Marking Methods
The two viable methods for crush site marking other than powdered carbon are a 10-0 suture through the epineurium of the sciatic nerve13,19, and FluoSpheres produced by Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR1. A 10-0 suture grossly marks the crush site, but requires higher level of microsurgical skill, and variability in application of the suture results in less precise marking of the boundary of the crush site than carbon marking. When studying the rate of regeneration, the boundary of the crush site must be precisely marked following injury. We have not investigated FluoSpheres; however, they meet the criteria for the precision and persistence of crush-site marking. They are particularly useful when imaging in-vivo regeneration in YFP mouse lines1. For our purposes we found the carbon marking adequate and inexpensive, with the additional benefit of being easily seen in subsequent semi-thin or electron microscopic evaluation. In addition, we have found that carbon marking persists for at least six weeks making it suitable for longer duration experiments.
Analysis of Regeneration after Crush
A complete investigation of post crush regeneration combines functional, electrophysiologic, and morphological assessments5,16. Morphological assessments following regeneration are perhaps the most common. These assessments can be separated into those that assess latency of growth, rate of axonal growth, and specificity of reinnervation16. In this report, we have presented a whole mount muscle procedure that can be used to quickly assess morphological regeneration (Figure 3). In this analysis denervated NMJs labeled by alpha-bungarotoxin and Schwann cell GAP-43 are quantified and compared to re-innervated junctions as labeled by neurofilament, SV2, and alpha-bungarotoxin. GAP-43 is markedly upregulated by Schwann cells after denervation and nicely identifies denervated terminal Schwann cells at the neuromuscular junction20. Though GAP-43 is expressed by axons, the concomitant use of neurofilament readily distinguishes GAP-43 positive axons from Schwann cells. Furthermore, because NMJs deep within the muscle may not be readily labeled by antibody (as compared to the small molecule alpha-bungarotoxin) Schwann cell GAP-43 immunoreactivity importantly confirms the denervated status of a neuromuscular junction and improves accuracy when counting denervated NMJs.
This method provides a simple and efficient method to assess the reinnervation status of the entire muscle endplate band at once. Others have used thy-1-CFP(23)/S100-GFP mice that express cyan fluorescent protein in axons and GFP in Schwann cells to follow re-innervation of the anterior tibialis after sciatic nerve crush2. One caveat must be noted, though. This method relies on neurofilament and SV2 immunoreactivity to quantify re-innervation. It is possible that axon outgrowth may be unimpeded but subsequent expression of SV2 may be delayed21. Therefore, in some experiments it will be important to confirm that delayed regeneration and not delayed presynaptic expression of SV2 (i.e. pre-synaptic differentiation) account for an observed phenotype.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the NIH grants K08NS065157 (to T.A.F.) In addition, the Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Award Number P30AR050950 from the National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases supported this work (T.A.F. and Steven S. Scherer). Finally, Shriners Pediatric Research Center Seed funding (T.A.F) supported this work. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Young-Jin Son for initially demonstrating the whole mount procedure and Amy A. Kim for her assistance in producing the sketches of Figure 1.
Name (description/quantity) | Supplier | Catalogue Number |
Mini Clipper with No. 0000 Blade | Roboz | RC-5903 |
Nair Hair Remover (9 oz.) | Church and Dwight Co., Inc. | N/A |
Betadine Surgical Scrub (1 gallon) | Fisher Scientific | 19066452 |
Ophthalmic Ointment (1 oz.) | Fisher Scientific | 19082795 |
Surgical Tools:
Name (description/quantity) | Supplier | Catalogue Number |
FST 250 Hot bead sterilizer | Fine Science Tools | 18000-45 |
Iris Scissors (11 cm long) | World Precision Instruments | 500216 |
Potts-Smith Forceps (Straight; 18cm; 1×2 Teeth) | Fine Science Tools | 11024-18 |
McPherson-Vannas Scissors (5 mm blades) | World Precision Instruments | 14124-G |
Dumont #5 Forceps – Dumoxel Standard Tip | Fine Science Tools | 11252-30 |
Dumont #5/45 Forceps – Dumoxel Standard Tip | Fine Science Tools | 11251-35 |
Ultra Fine Hemostats (Straight; Smooth Inside Surfaces) | Fine Science Tools | 13020-12 |
Powdered Activated Carbon (500 g) | Fisher Scientific | C272-500 |
Size 6-0 Sutures with C-1 Needle (Sterile, Silk, Black, Braided , Non-absorbable; 18” Length; Box of 36) | Roboz | SUT-1073-11 |
Reflex Clip Applier (for 9 mm clips) | World Precision Instruments | 500345 |
9mm Stainless Steel Reflex Clips (100/box) | World Precision Instruments | 500346 |
Animal Care:
Name (description/quantity) | Supplier | Catalogue Number |
0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection (Preservative Free; 20 mL) | Hospira | 0409-4888-20 |
Complete Homeothermic Blanket System with Flexible Probe (Medium, 115 VAC, 60 Hz) | Harvard Apparatus | 507222F |
Surgical Platform and Retractors:
(purchased at local hardware store)
Name (description/) | Quantity |
Stainless Steel Platform (Milled; ~12”x12”x1/8”) | 1 |
Button Magnets (Example: Eclipse E825) | 3 |
Stainless Steel Bolts (3” Long; Diameter Determined by Button Magnets) | 3 |
Stainless Steel Nuts (Sized to Fit Bolts) | 9 |
Rubber Bands (Light Tension) | 3 |
Insect Pins (Both Ends Bent to Form Hooks) | 3 |
Semi-Thins:
Name (description/quantity) | Supplier | Catalogue Number |
Paraformaldehyde (1 kg) | Sigma-Aldrich | P6148-1KG |
Sodium Phosphate Dibasic Anhydrous (500 g; Used to Prepare Phosphate Buffer) | Fisher Scientific | S375-500 |
Sodium Phosphate Monobasic Anhydrous (1 kg; Used to Prepare Phosphate Buffer) | Fisher Scientific | AC38987-0010 |
Glutaraldehyde (50%; 10 x 10 mL) | Ted Pella, Inc. | 18431 |
Osmium Tetroxide (4% Aqueous, 10 x 10 mL) | Ted Pella, Inc. | 18465 |
Propylene Oxide (450 mL) | Ted Pella, Inc. | 18601 |
Embed 812 (Kit, for hard blocks/high image contrast) | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 14120 |
Toluidine Blue (25 g) | Ted Pella, Inc. | 19451 |
Whole Mount Muscle Preparation and Immunohistochemistry:
Name (description/quantity) | Supplier | Catalogue Number |
Paraformaldehyde (1 kg) | Sigma-Aldrich | P6148-1KG |
Sodium Phosphate Dibasic Anhydrous (500 g; Used to Prepare Phosphate Buffer) | Fisher Scientific | S375-500 |
Sodium Phosphate Monobasic Anhydrous (1 kg; Used to Prepare Phosphate Buffer) | Fisher Scientific | AC38987-0010 |
10% BSA Diluent/Blocking Solution (200 mL) | Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc. | 50-61-00 |
Triton X-100 (100 mL) | Dot Scientific Incorporated | 9002-93-1 |
Glycine, 98% (1 kg) | Fisher Scientific | AC12007-0010 |
Tissue-Tek Cryo-OCT Compound (Case of 12; 4 oz bottles) | Fisher Scientific | 14-373-65 |
Sylgard DOW 170 (2 lb. Kit) | Fisher Scientific | NC9492579 |
Stainless Steel Insect Pins, Size 1 (100/pkg) | Fine Science Tools | 26001-40 |
Tetramethylrhodamine-A-Bungarotoxin (0.5 mg) | Sigma-Aldrich | T0195-.5MG |
Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Against SMI-312 (0.1 mL) | Covance | SMI-312R |
Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Against SV2 (0.1 mL) | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) | SV2 |
Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody Against GAP-43 | Novus Biologicals | NB300-143 |
Flourescein Conjugated Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ Subclass 1 Specific | Jackson ImmunoResearch | 115-095-205 |
DyLight 649 Conjugated Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG | Jackson ImmunoResearch | 711-495-152 |
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, dilactate; 10 mg) | Invitrogen | D3571 |
Vectashield Mounting Medium (10 mL) | Vector Laboratories | H-1000 |
Superfrost Plus Microscope Slides (White; Size: 75 x 25 mm; Pack of 144) | Fisher Scientific | 12-550-15 |
Fisherfinest Premium Cover Glasses (Size: 40 x 22 mm; Pack of 1 oz.) | Fisher Scientific | 12-548-5C |