The protocol provides a detailed method of neuronal imaging in brain slice using a tissue clearing method, ScaleSF. The protocol includes brain tissue preparation, tissue clarification, handling of cleared slices and confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging of neuronal structures from mesoscopic to microscopic levels.
A detailed protocol is provided here to visualize neuronal structures from mesoscopic to microscopic levels in brain tissues. Neuronal structures ranging from neural circuits to subcellular neuronal structures are visualized in mouse brain slices optically cleared with ScaleSF. This clearing method is a modified version of ScaleS and is a hydrophilic tissue clearing method for tissue slices that achieves potent clearing capability as well as a high-level of preservation of fluorescence signals and structural integrity. A customizable three dimensional (3D)-printed imaging chamber is designed for reliable mounting of cleared brain tissues. Mouse brains injected with an adeno-associated virus vector carrying enhanced green fluorescent protein gene were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and cut into slices of 1-mm thickness with a vibrating tissue slicer. The brain slices were cleared by following the clearing protocol, which include sequential incubations in three solutions, namely, ScaleS0 solution, phosphate buffer saline (–), and ScaleS4 solution, for a total of 10.5–14.5 h. The cleared brain slices were mounted on the imaging chamber and embedded in 1.5% agarose gel dissolved in ScaleS4D25(0) solution. The 3D image acquisition of the slices was carried out using a confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with a multi-immersion objective lens of a long working distance. Beginning with mesoscopic neuronal imaging, we succeeded in visualizing fine subcellular neuronal structures, such as dendritic spines and axonal boutons, in the optically cleared brain slices. This protocol would facilitate understanding of neuronal structures from circuit to subcellular component scales.
Tissue clearing methods have improved depth-independent imaging of biological and clinical samples with light microscopy, allowing for extraction of structural information on intact tissues1,2. Optical clearing techniques could also potentially speed up, and reduce the cost for histological analysis. Currently, three major clearing approaches are available: hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and hydrogel-based methods1,2. Hydrophilic approaches surpass in preserving fluorescence signals and tissue integrity and are less toxic compared to the other two approaches3,4.
A hydrophilic clearing method, ScaleS, holds a distinctive position with its preservation of structural and molecular integrity as well as potent clearing capability (clearing-preservation spectrum)5. In a previous study, we developed a rapid and isometric clearing protocol, ScaleSF, for tissue slices (~1-mm thickness) by modifying the clearing procedure of ScaleS6. This clearing protocol requires sequential incubations of brain slices in three solutions for 10.5-14.5 h. The method is featured with a high clearing-preservation spectrum, which is compatible even with electron microscopy (EM) analysis (Supplementary Figure 1), allowing for multi-scale high-resolution three dimensional (3D) imaging with accurate signal reconstruction6. Thus, ScaleSF should be effective especially in the brain, where neuronal cells elaborate exuberant processes of tremendous length, and arrange specialized fine subcellular structures for transmitting and receiving information. Extracting structural information with scales from circuit to subcellular levels on neuronal cells is quite useful toward better understanding of brain functions.
Here, we provide a detailed protocol to visualize neuronal structures with scales from the mesoscopic/circuit to microscopic/subcellular level using ScaleSF. The protocol includes tissue preparation, tissue clarification, handling of cleared tissues, and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) imaging of cleared tissues. Our protocol focuses on interrogating neuronal structures from circuit to subcellular component scales. For a detailed procedure for preparation of the solutions and stereotaxic injection of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors into mouse brains, refer to Miyawaki et al. 20167 and Okamoto et al. 20218, respectively.
All the experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Juntendo University (Approval No. 2021245, 2021246) and performed in accordance with Fundamental Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiments by the Science Council of Japan (2006). Here, male C57BL/6J mice injected with AAV vector carrying enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene and parvalbumin (PV)/myristoylation-EGFP-low-density lipoprotein receptor C-terminal bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mice (PV-FGL mice)9 were used. PV-FGL mice were maintained in C57BL/6J background. No sex-based differences were found with regard to this study.
1. Tissue preparation
2. Tissue clarification
NOTE: The compositions of ScaleS solutions used are listed in Table 1. Samples should be protected from light by covering with a foil. The clearing steps is shown in Figure 1A.
3. Brain slice mounting
NOTE: A customizable imaging chamber is used for reliable mounting of cleared brain slices (Figure 2)6. The chamber consists of the chamber frame and bottom coverslip. The microscope stage adaptors are also designed to mount the imaging chamber on microscope stages directly (Figure 2A,B). The chamber frame and microscope stage adaptors can be 3D-printed using in-house or outsourced 3D-printing services. 3D computer-aided design (CAD) data of the imaging chamber are provided in Furuta et al. 20226.
4. CLSM imaging
Optical clearing of a mouse brain slice of 1-mm thickness was achieved using this protocol. Figure 1B represents transmission images of a mouse brain slice before and after the clearing treatment. The tissue clearing method rendered a 1-mm-thick mouse brain slice transparent. A slight expansion in final sizes of brain slices was found after the incubation in the clearing solution for 12 h (linear expansion: 102.5% ± 1.3%). The preservation of fluorescence and structural integrity of the tissues was assessed with targeted EGFP expression in the plasma membrane in PV-FGL mice (Figure 1C). In these mice, somatodendritic membrane-targeted EGFP is expressed in PV-positive neurons9. EGFP expression targeted to the plasma membrane in the somatodendritic region was maintained after the treatment (Figure 1C). Additionally, the previous EM study shows well-preserved structural integrity in brain tissues cleared with ScaleSF (Supplementary Figure 1)6.
RI mismatch-induced aberrations caused a noticeable loss of image brightness and resolution (Figure 3). A 1-mm-thick brain slice of PV-FGL mouse was cleared and imaged under a CLSM equipped with a multi-immersion objective lens of a long WD. Adjustment of the correction collar of the objective lens to the water position (RI 1.33) hampered clear visualization of EGFP-positive neurons located at the depths of 400 µm and 800 µm due to low brightness and low contrast. (Figure 3A,C). These neurons were clearly visualized with the same CLSM, when the correction collar was adjusted to match the ScaleS4 solution (RI 1.47; Figure 3B,D). RI-matching between an immersion fluid and objective lens is critical for accurate 3D imaging in optically cleared tissues.
Lastly, mouse neocortical neurons were utilized to demonstrate the feasibility of the protocol. A mouse brain injected with AAV2/1-SynTetOff-EGFP vector10 in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) was fixed with 4% PFA in 0.1 M PB. Coronal slices of 1-mm thickness were prepared from the brain with a vibrating tissue slicer. After clearing and mounting on the imaging chamber, neuronal imaging targeted to neocortical neurons was conducted (Figure 4). A 3D reconstruction of EGFP-labeled neurons in the 1-mm-thick brain slice is represented in Figure 4A. A higher magnification image shows individual dendritic arbors decorated with dendritic spines (Figure 4B). We further showed axon terminal arborizations and axonal boutons in the contralateral cortex (Figure 4C).
Figure 1: Optical clearing of mouse brain slices of 1-mm thickness. (A) The schedule for ScaleSF tissue clearing. (B) Transmission images of a 1-mm-thick brain slices before (left) and after (right) treatment. (C) A 3D volume rendering of the cerebral cortex of a PV-FGL mouse cleared using the tissue clearing method. (D,E) xy images in (C) at the depths of 250 µm (D) and 750 µm (E). (F,G) Enlarged view of the rectangles outlined in (D) and (E). Images appearing in (C-G) are deconvoluted before the rendering process. Abbreviations: pia = pia mater, WM = white matter. Scale bar: 2 mm in (B), 500 µm in (C), 200 µm in (D,E), and 40 µm in (F,G). This figure has been modified from Furata et al. 20226. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: A customizable 3D-printed imaging chamber for tissue slice visualization. (A,B) A schema drawing (A) and picture (B) of a customizable 3D-printed imaging chamber. The imaging chamber is composed of a chamber frame, a bottom coverslip and microscope stage adaptors. Cleared tissue slices are placed onto the bottom coverslip and embedded in ScaleS4 gel. The chamber frame, bottom coverslip and microscope stage adaptors are customizable according to the size and thickness of tissue slices. (C) An imaging setup with the imaging chamber. The imaging chamber is immersed in ScaleS4 solution in a Petri dish and mounted on a stage of an upright CLSM. This figure has been modified from Furata et al. 20226. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Compromised deep imaging caused by an RI mismatch between an objective lens and ScaleS4 solution. (A–D) xy images of the cerebral cortex of a PV-FGL mouse at depths of 400 µm (A,B) and 800 µm (C,D). The correction of collar of a multi-immersion objective lens is adjusted to 1.33 in (A,C) and 1.47 in (B,D). Images are acquired with the same parameters except for RIs of the objective lens. Scale bar: 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Neuronal imaging in a 1-mm-thick mouse brain slice cleared with ScaleSF. (A) 3D volume rendering of EGFP-labeled mouse neocortical neurons in the S1. Neocortical neurons are labeled with the AAV2/1 SynTetOff-EGFP vector. (B) Dendritic arbors of EGFP-labeled neocortical neurons. A maximum intensity projection (MIP) image from a depth of 39 µm to 48 µm is represented. Arrowheads indicate dendritic spines. (C) EGFP-labeled axon terminals in the contralateral cortex. A MIP image from a depth of 481.5 µm to 513 µm is represented. Arrowheads indicate axonal boutons. Images appearing in (B) and (C) are deconvoluted. Scale bars: 300 µm in (A) and 10 µm in (C). The bar in (C) applies to (B) as well. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure 1: Ultrastructure in brain slices cleared with ScaleSF, CUBIC, and PACT. (A–C) Transmission EM images of mouse cerebral cortex cleared with ScaleSF (A), CUBIC (B), and PACT (C). Mouse brains are fixed with 4% PFA containing 1% glutaraldehyde. Ultrathin sections are prepared from cleared brain slices. Membrane structures are severely damaged in brain slices cleared with CUBIC (B) and PACT (C). Arrowheads indicate postsynaptic membranes. Scale bar: 500 nm. This figure has been modified from Furata et al. 20226. Please click here to download this File.
Recipies for ScaleS solutions | |
ScaleS0 solution | |
Reagent | Final concentration |
D-sorbitol | 20% (w/v) |
Glycerol | 5% (w/v) |
Methyl-β-cyclodextrin | 1 mM |
γ-cyclodextrin | 1 mM |
Dimethyl sulfoxide | 3% (v/v) |
10x PBS(–) | 1x |
ScaleS4 solution | |
Reagent | Final concentration |
Urea | 4 M |
D-sorbitol | 40% (w/v) |
Glycerol | 10% (w/v) |
Triton X-100 | 0.2% (w/v) |
Dimethyl sulfoxide | 25% (v/v) |
ScaleS4D25(0) solution | |
Reagent | Final concentration |
Urea | 4 M |
D-sorbitol | 40% (w/v) |
Glycerol | 10% (w/v) |
Dimethyl sulfoxide | 25% (v/v) |
Table 1: Composition of the three ScaleS solutions. The compositions of ScaleS0, ScaleS4, and ScaleS4D25(0) solutions are listed. For a detailed procedure for preparation of these solutions, refer to Miyawaki et al. 20167.
Critical steps within the protocol
There are a few critical steps in the protocol that should be conducted with utmost caution to obtain meaningful results. Uniform fixation of samples is imperative for 3D imaging within large-scale tissues. The objective lens, sample, and immersion fluid should have matching RI. RI-mismatch among them will lead to highly disturbed imaging of EGFP-expressing cells within the cleared brain slices (Figure 3). The correction collar adjustment of the objective lens to the immersion fluid minimizes depth-induced spherical aberrations to maximize the signal, contrast and spatial resolution in 3D imaging. The RIs of the prepared solutions can be measured using a refractometer.
Troubleshooting of the technique
Longer storage of the solutions can affect clearing capability, and its capacity for preservation of fluorescence signals and structural integrity. Freshly prepared solutions should be used. These solutions can be stored up to 1 month at 4 °C. Isometricity is critical for effective and efficient neuronal imaging with accurate signal reconstruction. Although a slight expansion in sample sizes was observed after incubation for 12 h (Figure 1B), the expansion can be controlled by decreasing the incubation period between 8-12 h. For more accurate 3D depth imaging, the correction collar might need to be adjusted at a given plane due to depth-induced spherical aberration.
Modifications of the technique
In the present study, we utilized mouse brain tissues to demonstrate the feasibility of the protocol. Yet the protocol described here can be also used for large-brained animals, such as primates. Indeed, this protocol has been used in common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) brain tissues, and succeeded in simultaneous visualization of neural circuit and subcellular structures of its corticostriatal circuits6. The microscope stage adaptors are designed to mount the imaging chamber on microscope stages directly6 (Figure 2A,B). Cleared tissue slices are observable using an inverted microscope through the bottom coverslip of the imaging chamber. Following restoration of cleared brain tissues with PBS(-) (deScaling)5,11, we can prepare tissue sections of 20-µm to 50-µm thickness from brain tissues that were cleared with ScaleSF (re-sectioning)6. Subcellular structures captured within cleared tissues can be imaged again on re-sections with a high NA objective lens of a short WD. Clearing of brain slices perfused with fixatives containing glutaraldehyde has been achieved using this protocol, providing superior ultrastructure preservation6. ScaleSF achieves a high-level of ultrastructure preservation that allows for EM analysis in optically cleared tissues6 (Supplementary Figure 1). The EM compatibility of this method is particularly useful for imaging structures with the scales from macroscopic to nanoscopic level.
Limitations of the technique
The protocol described here allows us to visualize neuronal structures from circuit to subcellular scales in brain slices of 1-mm thickness. However, three limitations remain in the protocol. The first is the clearing capability of the clearing protocol. ScaleSF is a clearing protocol for brain slices, not for the whole brain. Although brain slices of 1-mm thickness can provide good knowledge of dendritic and local axonal arbors12, information about axonal projections spanning the entire brain is fragmentary and incomplete in the slices13,14,15,16. The second is the imaging resolution. Using the protocol described here, we succeeded in visualizing subcellular neuronal structures, such as dendritic spines and axonal boutons, in an optically cleared brain slice (Figure 4). However, the resolution of the objective lens used in this study, xy resolution of 400-750 nm, is not sufficient to resolve more fine structures of neuronal cells. Given high NA objective lenses are typically designed for oil-immersion (RI 1.52), RI-mismatch with the solutions (RI 1.47) might prevent high-resolution imaging with these objective lenses. The third is fluorescent protein labeling of neuronal cells. The labeling method limits broad applications of our imaging technique. Histochemical and/or immunohistochemical techniques that label large-scale tissues while maintaining tissue integrity would significantly advance the protocol provided here.
Significance with respect to existing methods and future applications of the technique
In the present study, we describe a detail protocol for neuronal imaging from mesoscopic to microscopic structures using ScaleSF tissue clearing. The protocol described here makes it possible to visualize neuronal structures from circuit to subcellular levels in a reasonable amount of time without specialized equipment, facilitating understanding of neuronal structures from circuit to component scales. Neurons elaborate exuberant processes of tremendous length and arrange specialized fine structures for transmitting and receiving information. Thus, neuronal imaging requires a tissue clearing method that exerts potent clearing capability as well as a high-level of tissue preservation for simultaneous visualization of both large and small-scale structures. However, tissue clearing methods featured with high clearing capabilities aggressively remove lipids and pigments for extensive tissue clarification3,4, compromising tissue integrity5,6,17 (Supplementary Figure 1). This is in stark contrast to the clearing protocol used here that achieves a high-level of structure preservation6 (Supplementary Figure 1). Hence, ScaleSF tissue clearing allows for effective and efficient neuronal imaging that requires multi-scale high-resolution 3D imaging with accurate signal reconstruction.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors thank Yoko Ishida (Juntendo University) for AAV vector production and Kisara Hoshino (Juntendo University) for technical assistance. This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (JP20K07231 to K.Y.; JP21H03529 to T.F.; JP20K07743 to M.K.; JP21H02592 to H.H.) and Scientific Research on Innovative Area “Resonance Bio” (JP18H04743 to H.H.). This study was also supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (JP21dm0207112 to T.F. and H.H.), Moonshot R&D from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (JPMJMS2024 to H.H.), Fusion Oriented Research for disruptive Science and Technology (FOREST) from JST (JPMJFR204D to H.H.), Grants-in-Aid from the Research Institute for Diseases of Old Age at the Juntendo University School of Medicine (X2016 to K.Y.; X2001 to H.H.), and the Private School Branding Project.
16x multi-immersion objective lens | Leica Microsystems | HC FLUOTAR 16x/0.60 IMM CORR VISIR | |
Agar | Nacalai Tesque | 01028-85 | |
Agarose | TaKaRa Bio | L03 | |
Dimethyl sulfoxide | Nacalai Tesque | 13407-45 | |
D-Sorbitol | Nacalai Tesque | 06286-55 | |
γ-cyclodextrin | Wako Pure Chemical Industries | 037-10643 | |
Glycerol | Sigma-Aldrich | G9012 | |
Huygens Essential | Scientific Volume Imaging | ver. 18.10.0p8/21.10.1p0 64b | |
Imaris | Bitplane | ver. 9.0.0 | |
Leica Application Suite X | Leica Microsystems | LAS X, ver. 3.5.5.19976 | |
Methyl-β-cyclodextrin | Tokyo Chemical Industry | M1356 | |
Paraformaldehyde | Merck Millipore | 1.04005.1000 | |
Phosphate Buffered Saline (10x; pH 7.4) | Nacalai Tesque | 27575-31 | 10x PBS(–) |
Sodium azide | Nacalai Tesque | 31233-55 | |
Sodium pentobarbital | Kyoritsu Seiyaku | N/A | |
TCS SP8 | Leica Microsystems | N/A | |
Triton X-100 | Nacalai Tesque | 35501-15 | |
Urea | Nacalai Tesque | 35940-65 | |
Vibrating tissue slicer | Dosaka EM | PRO7N |