A procedure for the synthesis of polystyrene-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes using successive chemical modification steps to selectively introduce the polymer chains to the sidewalls and their self-assembly via anisotropic patchiness is presented.
We demonstrate a straightforward protocol to graft pristine multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with polystyrene (PS) chains at the sidewalls through a free-radical polymerization strategy to enable the modulation of the nanotube surface properties and produce supramolecular self-assembly of the nanostructures. First, a selective hydroxylation of the pristine nanotubes through a biphasic catalytically mediated oxidation reaction creates superficially distributed reactive sites at the sidewalls. The latter reactive sites are subsequently modified with methacrylic moieties using a silylated methacrylic precursor to create polymerizable sites. Those polymerizable groups can address further polymerization of styrene to produce a hybrid nanomaterial containing PS chains grafted to the nanotube sidewalls. The polymer-graft content, amount of silylated methacrylic moieties introduced and hydroxylation modification of the nanotubes are identified and quantified by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). The presence of reactive functional groups hydroxyl and silylated methacrylate are confirmed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR). Polystyrene-grafted carbon nanotube solutions in tetrahydrofuran (THF) provide wall-to-wall collinearly self-assembled nanotubes when cast samples are analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Those self-assemblies are not obtained when suitable blanks are similarly cast from analogous solutions containing non-grafted counterparts. Therefore, this method enables the modification of the nanotube anisotropic patchiness at the sidewalls which results into spontaneous auto-organization at the nanoscale.
Since the discovery of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs),1,2 the scientific communities have applied their outstanding electrical, mechanical and thermal properties3 in a wide range of cutting-edge applications by modulating their surface properties via covalent4 and non-covalent5 strategies. Examples of those applications include their use as transducers in sensors,6,7 electrodes in solar cells,8 heterogeneous supports in catalysis,9 nanoreactors in synthesis,10 anti-fouling agents in protective films,11 fillers in composite materials,12etc. However, the possibility to modulate the surface properties of their more robust, yet industrially available multiwalled counterparts namely, MWCNTs, to control the directionality in their non-covalent interactions at the nanoscale, has remained a difficult task so far.13
Supramolecular self-assembly of molecular building blocks is one of the most versatile strategies to control the organization of matter at the nanoscale.14,15 In this sense, supramolecular interactions involve directional, short-range and mid-range non-covalent interactions such as H-bond, Van der Waals, dipole-dipole, ion-dipole, dipole-induced dipole, π- π stacking, cation-π, anion-π, coulombic, among others.16 Unfortunately, directionality in self-assembly for larger structures such as MWCNTs is not spontaneous and usually requires external motive forces (e.g. templates or energy dissipation systems).17 A recent report used non-covalent wrapping of nanotubes with tailored co-polymers to pursue the latter goal,18 but the use of covalent strategies to offer new alternatives to solve that problem have remained scarcely explored.
Chemical modification of carbon nanotubes can be selectively carried out to introduce different functional groups either to the termini or to the sidewalls of the same.19,20 One of the most useful approaches to tailor the surface properties in carbon nanostructures is polymer-grafting through standard polymerization routes. Typically, those approaches involve the preliminary introduction of polymerizable or initiator groups (acrylic, vinyl, etc.) on the nanostructure surface and their successive polymerization with a suitable monomer.21 In the case of MWCNTs, the covalent introduction of polymer chains on the sidewalls to control their patchiness in an anisotropic fashion has remained a challenge.
Here we will show how a series of straightforward chemical modification steps22,23 can be applied to insert PS chains on the sidewalls of MWCNTs in order to modify their surface patchiness and to promote their anisotropic self-assembly23 at the nanoscale. During the modification route, a first step allows for the selective hydroxylation of pristine MWCNTs at the sidewalls by following a biphasic catalytically mediated oxidation reaction to yield the hydroxylated counterparts namely, MWCNT-OH. A second step uses 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (TMSPMA) to introduce silylated methacrylic moieties to the previously created hydroxyl groups (MWCNT-O-TMSPMA). These inserts will provide surface reactive sites during a third step, when styrene monomer is polymerized from the methacrylic moieties thus yielding polymer chains grafted to the sidewalls of the nanotubes at the end (i.e. MWCNT-O-PS).
Caution: Please consult all relevant material safety data sheets (MSDS) before use. Several of the chemicals used in this protocol are acutely toxic and carcinogenic. Carbon nanotube derivatives may have additional respiratory hazards compared to other traditional bulk carbon allotropes. It is suspected that carbon nanotubes in aerosol may affect lungs in a similar way than asbestos, though their carcinogenic properties have not been completely elucidated so far. Please use all appropriate safety practices when performing the chemical reactions and product processing steps including the use of fume hood and personal protective equipment (lab coat, gloves, safety glasses, closed shoes, full length pants) while suitable filtering facepiece respirators should be particularly used when potential nanotube dust may be generated (NIOSH approved N95 model, or European EN 149 certified FFP3 versions). Portions of the following procedure involve standard inert atmosphere handling techniques.24
1. Selective Hydroxylation of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes 22
2. Grafting MWCNT-OH with Polystyrene Chains 22,23
TGA data were collected from pristine nanotubes, hydroxylated nanotubes, nanotubes modified with silylated methacrylic moieties and polystyrene-grafted nanotubes (Figure 1). FT-IR results were collected from hydroxylated nanotubes and nanotubes modified with silylated methacrylic moieties (Figure 2). TEM images were collected from pristine nanotubes and polystyrene-grafted nanotubes (Figure 3). TGA drops in mass are used to calculate the stepwise yields of chemical modification of the nanotubes.22,23,25,26 FT-IR is used to confirm the presence of reactive functional groups introduced to the nanotubes. TEM is used to confirm anisotropic self-assembly of polymer-grafted nanotubes against pristine counterparts.23
Figure 1: Quantitative characterization of chemical modifications on carbon nanotubes. TGA curves for pristine MWCNTs (black), MWCNT-OH (red), MWCNT-O-TMSPMA (blue) and MWCNT-O-PS (green). Grey text and dashed lines indicate the temperature zones where each component is typically decomposed.
Figure 2: Confirmation of reactive functional groups introduced to carbon nanotubes. FT-IR spectra for: a) MWCNT-OH (red) and b) MWCNT-O-TMSPMA (blue). Grey text and solid lines indicate the position of relevant bands to confirm the presence of the introduced reactive groups. Inserted figures are schematic representations for the modified nanotubes.
Figure 3: Anisotropic self-assembly of polymer-grafted carbon nanotubes. TEM images (above) from solutions in THF after solvent evaporation for: a) pristine MWCNTs, b) MWCNT-O-PS. Schemes below each micrography are a representation for the typical nanoscale behavior of the nanostructures. Reproduced and adapted from Ref. 23 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
In this method, there are some steps which result critical to guarantee a successful grafting process. First, the biphasic catalytically mediated oxidation reaction (Step 1.1) should be carried out with recently dispersed carbon nanotubes (Step 1.1.1.5). If dispersion results unviable according to the recommendations in the protocol, the use of an ultrasonic tip sonicator would be helpful if using the same indications (Step 1.1.1.6). Using shorter MWCNTs may also help in solving dispersion issues. Second, setting of the vacuum filtration system is crucial in purification efficiency (Step 1.2.2). In this sense, centering the membrane on the sintered glass area of the filter support surface (Step 1.2.2.5) may result in membrane wrinkles if the procedure is not followed appropriately (particularly, Steps 1.2.2.5 – 1.2.2.6). If the latter occurs, repeat Steps 1.2.2.3 to 1.2.2.5 until homogeneous filter adhesion is obtained. Alternatively, also try with non-wetted membrane versions (i.e. do not follow Steps 1.2.2.2 – 1.2.2.4) and observe filtration results. The use of dry membranes prevents the occurrence of membrane wrinkles during their fixation in Steps 1.2.2.5 – 1.2.2.6, while, depending on the membrane material used and selected manufacturer, cutoff size may vary between dry and wet versions and filtration efficiency might be affected depending on the case. Third, the polymerization reaction is the last critical step (Step 2.2). The most common source of inefficient polymerization is the use of non-purified monomer. Make sure to use freshly purified styrene using an alumina gel preparative column, cover the container with aluminum foil to protect the monomer from light and keep stored at 4 °C until used. The use of MWCNTs with a larger diameter or shorter lengths should not reflect any representative variation in the final outcomes. However, limitations may arise if SWCNTs, double-wall carbon nanotubes or MWCNTs with a shorter diameter are used. The use of the previous three examples may result into decomposition of the nanotube structure if the oxidation reaction (Step 1.1.3) is carried out for the same reaction time. Troubleshooting of the latter may be done by testing shorter times and performing TGA and FT-IR analysis to confirm optimal results.
TGA is the simplest method for monitoring the success in each chemical modification step. A direct analysis of the mass losses and temperature values where these occur in TGA curves obtained between room temperature and 1000 °C allow for a quantification of the modification yield in the products (Figure 1). The TGA curve for the pristine MWCNTs exhibits one single drop in mass between 550 °C and 820 °C for up to 96% in weight (black curve in Figure 1). This loss in mass corresponds to the decomposition of the nanotubes when the analysis is carried out under air flow. Beyond 820 °C a constant weight is observed due to remaining inorganic impurities in the raw product. Under the same analysis conditions, MWCNT-OH (red curve in Figure 1) shows an additional weak drop between 200 °C and 300 °C in comparison with the MWCNT curve.22 The difference in weight percent between the MWCNT curve and the MWCNT-OH at the end of the previous range indicates the content in hydroxyl groups inserted to the nanotube sidewalls during the biphasic catalytically mediated oxidation reaction. Typical hydroxyl content for MWCNT-OH is found between 2% and 5% in weight. Besides, an absence of this additional weight drop indicates that the hydroxylation reaction did not occur. Beyond that temperature range, a complete decomposition of the nanotubes occurs earlier at 800 °C, while higher temperatures afford a constant weight value. On the other hand, a typical TGA curve for MWCNT-O-TMSPMA shows two consecutive drops in weight under the same air flow conditions (blue curve in Figure 1). The first mass loss is found between 380 °C and 470 °C, which corresponds to the decomposition of the methacrylic moieties from the TMSPMA inserted to the hydroxylic groups; the temperature interval is in agreement with the literature22,25 for TMSPMA similarly inserted to different types of nanostructures via covalent chemistry. The second drop starts at 550 °C and ends at 790 °C. This weight loss is originated by the decomposition of carbon in the nanotubes. The constant value in mass observed after this temperature interval corresponds to both the remaining inorganic matter from the original nanotubes and non-volatile silicate derivatives formed during the decomposition of the TMSPMA moieties. The relationship between the first weight drop compared with the second one corresponds to the content in TMSPMA in the nanotubes. In this sense, the first loss is typically of 8% to 12% in weight compared with the second drop. The absence of the first weight drop is evidence of failure in the coupling of TMSPMA to the hydroxyl groups. Finally, a representative TGA curve for MWCNT-O-PS (green curve in Figure 1) shows three clear variations in weight under air flow, if compared with the pristine counterparts. The first drop occurs between 270 °C and 380 °C and is produced when the polystyrene chains grafted to the nanotubes are decomposed; this interval of temperature is in accordance with the literature22,26 for PS grafted to different types of carbon materials through covalent procedures. The second weight loss starts at ca. 400 °C and ends at 480 °C, which is produced by the loss of the methacrylic component from TMSPMA. The third drop appears at around 600 °C and ends at 780 °C and is a result of the decomposition of the nanotubes. The ratio between the first weight drop and the third one provides the PS content in the polymer-grafted nanotubes. Typical content in PS for MWCNT-O-PS is found between 30% and 40% in weight compared with the nanotube content.23 Lack of the first weight drop is evidence of failure in the polymerization step.
The FT-IR spectra can be useful to confirm the presence of the reactive functional groups introduced to the pristine MWCNTs (Figure 2). Those groups include the hydroxyls and the silylated methacrylic moieties. Typically, spectra from MWCNT-OH (red curve, Figure 2a) show a broad strong band at 3427 cm-1, which corresponds to the stretching of O-H groups. Additionally, a weak but clear band can also be found at 1193 cm-1 produced by the stretching of the bonds between the aromatic carbons in the nanotube walls and the OH groups. On the contrary, spectra from MWCNT-O-TMSPMA (blue curve, Figure 2b) show a strong band at 3442 cm-1 produced by the stretching of Si-OH bonds. The same bonds also produce two additional moderate bands at 1030 cm-1 and 812 cm-1, respectively. In addition, the carbonyl C=O bond in the ester group of the methacrylic moieties afford a weak stretching band at 1718 cm-1. Moreover, Si-OC bonds formed between the TMSPMA group and the nanotube give two typical moderate bands appearing at 1102 cm-1 and 801 cm-1, whereas the last band is partially overlapped to the neighboring band at 812 cm-1 from Si-OH. Methacrylic C=C bonds in the inserted TMSPMA moieties give one moderate stretching band at 1646 cm-1. Finally, Si-C bonds contained in the silylated portion provide a weak but clear stretching band at 707 cm-1. An absence of the bands at 1102 cm-1 and 801 cm-1 indicates two possibilities: 1) failure in the covalent linking between TMSPMA and the hydroxyl groups at the nanotubes and 2) inefficient elimination of reactants. The lack of the bands at 1718 cm-1 and 1646 cm-1 shows that undesired hydrolysis of the ester group occurred during product purification (e.g. by mistakenly washing with acids or bases).
Microscopic analysis of drop-cast solutions using THF as solvent can show the typical self-assembly behavior in MWCNT-O-PS which does not occur in pristine counterparts (Figure 3).23 Solutions from pristine MWCNTs analyzed by TEM after evaporation afford typical random networks of nanotubes or clusters (Figure 3a). However, equivalent samples prepared from MWCNT-O-PS provide aligned nanostructures which contain collinear nanotubes self-assembled by the walls (Figure 3b). This auto-organization behavior is produced by the anisotropic patchiness generated by the polystyrene chains grafted to the sidewalls of the nanotubes. Typical examples for self-organized nanotubes provide assembled bodies which contain between two and six nanotubes adhered to each other along the longitudinal axis thereof. Failure in polymer-grafting typically results in absence of that trend.
We have demonstrated a method for obtaining multiwalled carbon nanotubes with anisotropic self-assembly properties via grafting polystyrene chains on the sidewalls using a free-radical polymerization route. Such a selective modification of the surface properties of the nanotubes is obtained by successive chemical modification steps to insert reactive functional groups selectively to the sidewalls. These successive modifications allow for the modulation of the surface patchiness which finally results into collinearly auto-organized nanostructures through non-covalent interactions. We expect that this strategy can be re-applied to other acrylic- or vinyl-derivative polymer types and new hybrid materials and composites could arise in a future. Moreover, we believe that this method would open new opportunities in carbon nanotube processing strategies under attractive conditions for the industry and academia.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We would like to acknowledge the FQ-PAIP and DGAPA-PAPIIT programs from National Autonomous University of Mexico (grant numbers 5000-9158, 5000-9156, IA205616 and IA205316) and the National Council for Science and Technology from Mexico -CONACYT- (grant number 251533).
Tetrapropylammonium bromide, 99 % (TPABr) | Sigma-Aldrich | 88104 | Irritant, toxic |
Potassium permanganate, 99 % (KMnO4) | Sigma-Aldrich | 223468 | |
Acetic acid, 99.5 % | Sigma-Aldrich | 45726 | |
Pristine multiwalled carbon nanotubes, 99 % (MWCNTs) | Bayer Technology Services | Donated sample | Harmful dusts. >1 mm in length and 13–16 nm in outer diameter. Alternative supplier: Nanocyl, Catalog N. NC7000, website: http://www.nanocyl.com/ |
Sodium Chloride, 98 % (NaCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | S3014 | Technical grade can also be used |
Ethanol, 99.8 % (EtOH) | Sigma-Aldrich | 32221 | Technical grade can also be used |
Methanol, 99.8 % (MeOH) | Sigma-Aldrich | 322415 | Highly toxic. Technical grade can also be used |
Hydroquinone, 99 % | Sigma-Aldrich | H9003 | |
Toluene, 99.8 % | Sigma-Aldrich | 244511 | Anhydrous |
3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate, 98 % (TMSPMA) | Sigma-Aldrich | 440159 | Air sensitive, toxic |
Azobisisobutyronitrile, 99 % (AIBN) | Sigma-Aldrich | 755745 | Explosive |
Styrene, 99 % | Sigma-Aldrich | S4972 | Purified using an alumina gel preparative column and stored at 4 °C |
Acetone, 99.5 % | Sigma-Aldrich | 179124 | Technical grade can also be used |
Tetrahydrofuran, 99.9 % (THF) | Sigma-Aldrich | 494461 | |
Dichloromethane, 99.5 % | Sigma-Aldrich | 443484 | Highly toxic |
Hydrochloric acid, 37 % | Sigma-Aldrich | 435570 | Harmful fumes |