Mouse cardiac transplantation models represent valuable research tools for studying transplantation immunology. The present protocol details mouse heterotopic cervical cardiac transplantation that involves the placement of cuffs on the recipient’s common carotid artery and the donor’s pulmonary artery trunk to allow for laminar blood flow.
Murine models of cardiac transplantation are frequently utilized to study ischemia-reperfusion injury, innate and adaptive immune responses after transplantation, and the impact of immunomodulatory therapies on graft rejection. Heterotopic cervical heart transplantation in mice was first described in 1991 using sutured anastomoses and subsequently modified to include cuff techniques. This modification allowed for improved success rates, and since then, there have been multiple reports that have proposed further technical improvements. However, translation into more widespread utilization remains limited due to the technical difficulty associated with graft anastomoses, which requires precision to achieve adequate length and caliber of the cuffs to avoid vascular anastomotic twisting or excessive tension, which can result in damage to the graft. The present protocol describes a modified technique for performing heterotopic cervical cardiac transplantation in mice which involves cuff placement on the recipient’s common carotid artery and the donor’s pulmonary artery in alignment with the direction of the blood flow.
Abbott et al. published1 the first description of heterotopic abdominal heart transplantation in rats in 1964. These surgical techniques were refined and simplified by Ono et al. in 19692. Corry et al. first described a method for heterotopic abdominal heart transplantation in mice in 1973; similar to the previously reported rat models, this involved engraftment into the host's abdomen with revascularization by end-to-side anastomoses of the donor's pulmonary artery and ascending aorta to the recipient's inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta, respectively3. Heterotopic cervical heart transplantation in rats was described by Heron in 1971 using Teflon cuffs made from 16 G (1.6 mm outer diameter) intravenous catheters4. Chen5 and Matsuura et al.6 later reported heterotopic cervical heart transplantation in mice in 1991, whose techniques differed primarily in their method of re-anastomosis. Chen's approach involved sutured anastomoses of the donor's ascending aorta to the carotid artery of the recipient and the donor's pulmonary artery to the external jugular vein of the recipient5. Due to the advanced technical skill required for these microsurgical sutured anastomoses, a significant amount of time and experience was necessary to achieve a high success rate. Matsuura et al. described a method utilizing a non-suture cuff technique, similar to that used by Heron, which involved end-to-end anastomoses using the extra-luminal placement of cuffs. He fashioned Teflon cuffs from 22 G (0.8 mm outer diameter) and 24 G (0.67 mm outer diameter) intravenous catheters and placed them over the recipient's external jugular vein and common carotid artery, respectively6. These cuffs were then placed inside the donor's pulmonary artery and aorta and secured by tying a suture ligature around the connection. This approach translated into an improved success rate. Most importantly, it resulted in a shortening of the time required to complete both cervical anastomoses, thus reducing the warm ischemic time of the graft to less than one-third of that utilizing the abdominal suturing method. Furthermore, since the cuffs are placed around the external surface of the vessel, there is no foreign body exposed to the vessel lumen, which largely reduces the possibility of thrombosis after surgery7. Meanwhile, utilization of the cuff technique provides support around the vessels at the site of the anastomosis without requiring any suturing, which reduces the risk of bleeding after revascularization6.
Numerous revisions of this technique have been proposed. To accommodate the short length of the mouse common carotid artery (approximately 5 mm), Tomita et al.8 developed a modification of this technique with a smaller arterial cuff (0.6 mm outer diameter) while omitting holding sutures and pulling the artery directly through the cuff with fine forceps instead. Wang et al. further simplified this approach by placing 22 G and 24 G cuffs on the donor's right pulmonary artery and recipient's right common carotid artery, respectively9. Various reports have described modifications to these approaches, including the use of specialized cuffs, microsurgical clamps, vessel dilators, and cardioplegia10,11,12. Notably, all of these methods involve the retrograde circulation of blood through the heart, with blood flowing from the recipient common carotid artery to the donor aorta, the coronary arteries, the coronary sinus, then emptying into the right atrium and exiting from the pulmonary artery into the recipient external jugular vein.
Compared to engraftment in the abdomen, cervical cardiac transplantation offers multiple advantages. As previously mentioned, cervical exposure allows for quicker revascularization and shorter warm ischemic times6. The cervical method is also less invasive and is associated with shorter postoperative recovery times as it avoids a laparotomy6. Importantly, end-to-end anastomoses with cuffs can be performed instead of end-to-side anastomoses, which decreases the risk of complications such as anastomotic bleeding. The abdominal approach also poses an increased risk of developing thrombotic complications in the abdominal aorta or inferior vena cava, leading to spinal cord ischemia and hindlimb paralysis. The superficial cervical location of the transplant allows for easy access to graft viability assessment by palpation, electrocardiography, and invasive or non-invasive imaging. Although the cervical grafts resume spontaneous cardiac activity following reperfusion, they do not significantly impact the systolic and diastolic parameters of the recipient. This model provides valuable insight for studying cellular responses following transplantation, such as ischemia-reperfusion injury and graft rejection. Furthermore, this model offers an ideal approach to allow for post-transplant imaging, such as intravital two-photon microscopy or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. To this end, our laboratory has previously reported methods to image moving tissues and organs in the mouse, including beating murine hearts and aortic arch grafts following heterotopic cervical transplantation to visualize leukocyte trafficking during ischemia-reperfusion injury and within atherosclerotic plaques, respectively13,14,15. Additionally, due to its superficial location and ease of exposure, this model is suitable for cardiac re-transplantation16.
This report describes a technique that allows for laminar blood flow with the external placement of the vascular cuffs on the vessels from which blood flow originates. This allows for a smooth transition of blood flow from one vessel to the next, avoiding the exposure of the distal vessel edge into the vascular lumen. Additionally, the technique utilizes a larger 20 G cuff, instead of previously used 22 G cuffs, for the donor pulmonary artery to ensure ample return of blood flow to the recipient.
All animal handling procedures were conducted in compliance with the NIH Care and Use of Laboratory Animals guidelines and approved by the Animal Studies Committee at Washington University School of Medicine. Hearts from C57BL/6 (B6) and BALB/c mice (weighing 20-25 g) were transplanted into gender-matched B6 recipients (6-8 weeks of age). The mice were obtained from commercial sources (see Table of Materials). Syngeneic transplants were performed to evaluate cellular responses related to ischemia-reperfusion injury, and allogeneic transplants were performed to investigate the immune mechanisms involved in graft tolerance and rejection. B6 lysozyme M-green fluorescent protein (LysM-GFP) reporter mice17, originally obtained from Klaus Ley of La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA, and subsequently bred in our facility, were used as recipients for selected experiments to visualize neutrophil infiltration into cardiac grafts. Survival surgery was performed using aseptic procedures.
1. Donor procedure
2. Recipient procedure
3. Postoperative care
4. Intravital two-photon imaging of leukocyte trafficking in the heart graft
This mouse cervical heterotopic cardiac transplantation model has been utilized to perform over 1,000 transplants in our laboratory, with a survival rate of approximately 97%. The success rate is slightly higher than previous reports using other cervical heterotopic heart transplantation techniques in mice10,11,20. This could potentially be attributed to the larger 20 G cuff placed on the donor pulmonary artery to ensure ample return of blood flow to the recipient (Figure 1B,C). Additionally, the alignment of blood flow with cuff placement in the present technique minimizes the risk of thrombosis and anastomotic turbulence (Figure 1,2). While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound could assess the turbulence of graft perfusion22,23, we have not yet utilized these techniques in the experiments. Intraoperative death using this technique is rare for experienced microsurgeons. Postoperative mortality is most often due to bleeding complications. The mean recipient operation time was 36.5 ± 3.5 min, with an average cold ischemia time of 20 min. For survival studies, cardiac grafts were assessed daily by direct visualization and digital palpation of the heartbeat. Mice are typically sacrificed for graft evaluation around 7-14 days postoperatively. Intravital two-photon imaging is a terminal procedure usually performed early after transplantation to evaluate leukocyte trafficking (Figure 3).
Most syngeneic transplants maintained strong heartbeats until sacrifice, up to 6 months after transplantation. On gross inspection, most syngeneic grafts appeared normal and histologic examination revealed no evidence of rejection. All non-immunosuppressed allogeneic transplants (BALB/c into B6) developed a diminished heartbeat within 1-2 weeks after engraftment. Excised allogeneic grafts from such mice were grossly dilated, and histologic examination showed diffuse infiltration of lymphocytes and areas of myocardial necrosis.
Figure 1: Preparation of heart graft for transplantation. (A) The heart is excised from the donor mouse. (B,C) The pulmonary artery trunk is exposed and pulled through a 20 G cuff, folded back, and secured with a 10-0 nylon suture. (D) A 10-0 nylon suture is placed through the edge of the recipient's external jugular vein and fixed to underlying tissue. (E) A 10-0 nylon suture is placed through the edge of the donor aorta and secured to the underlying tissue adjacent to the recipient carotid artery. (F) The recipient's common carotid artery cuff is inserted into the donor aorta and secured with an 8-0 silk suture. (G) The donor pulmonary artery cuff is inserted into the recipient's external jugular vein and secured with an 8-0 silk suture. (H) Proximal slipknot on the recipient's external jugular vein is released, followed by the release of the common carotid artery slipknot. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Intra-operative view of cardiac graft. A 1 mm 20 G cuff is pulled over the donor's pulmonary artery and secured with a 10-0 nylon tie. A 0.6 mm 24 G cuff is pulled over the recipient's right common carotid artery and secured with a 10-0 nylon tie. Anchor sutures (10-0 nylon) are placed in the wall of the donor aorta and the recipient's right external jugular vein and secured to underlying tissue to prevent movement during cuff insertion. (AO = aorta, PA = pulmonary artery, CCA = common carotid artery, EJV = external jugular vein). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Intravital two-photon imaging of leukocyte dynamics in the heart graft. Intravital two-photon imaging of beating heart transplanted from B6 mouse to B6 LysM-GFP recipient demonstrates trafficking of recipient neutrophils into the cardiac graft tissues between 2-3 h postoperatively. (Green = neutrophils, red = vessels labeled with quantum dots). Scale bar = 20 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Complication | Possible Causes | Solutions |
Recipient death | Hypothermia | Heating pad |
Dehydration | 0.9% saline i.p. postoperatively | |
Poor graft perfusion | Carotid artery torsion | Re-anastomosis, or |
Thrombus or air emboli | Open arterial anastomosis and flush with heparinized saline | |
Venous obstruction | Thrombus or air emboli | Re-anastomosis, or |
Open venous anastomosis and flush with heparinized saline | ||
Postoperative bleeding | Bleeding jugular vein branches | Ligate jugular vein branches |
Cotton swab compression | ||
Loose cuffs | Tighten cuffs | |
Weak heartbeat | Cold cardiac graft | Drip warm saline on surface of heart |
Graft twisting | Improper graft position | Ensure graft is properly oriented before skin closure |
Erratic activity (eg. running in circles) | Cerebral ischemia | Ligate common carotid artery inferior to carotid bifurcation |
Table 1: Troubleshooting for complications. Commonly encountered complications with solutions.
Utilizing this technique, mouse heterotopic cervical cardiac transplantation can be performed in less than 40 min by an experienced microsurgeon and in approximately 60 min by an entry-level microsurgeon. While cervical heart transplantation has been studied in numerous animal models, a mouse model remains the gold standard due to multiple well-defined genetic strains, genetic alteration capabilities, and the availability of numerous reagents, including monoclonal antibodies24. The technique described here provides a unique opportunity for post-transplant monitoring, such as electrocardiography or intravital imaging, including two-photon microscopy (Figure 3) or serial non-invasive PET imaging13,14,15,25. This method provides a superficial location for the heart graft that is easier to stabilize for intravital imaging, thus avoiding the complexity inherent to the abdominal transplantation method due to the deeper location of the graft and the surrounding abdominal organs. Furthermore, this technique is especially useful in the context of re-transplantation. Re-transplantation models represent powerful tools for identifying resident cells in transplanted cardiac grafts that mediate alloimmune responses. While we have previously utilized this technique in a mouse heart re-transplantation model to assess short-term outcomes, this approach can be expanded upon in future experiments to explore long-term outcomes16. To this end, the present investigations thus far have utilized a short period of cold ischemia (approximately 20 min). Future studies could investigate the effect of prolonged cold or warm ischemia on short- and long-term outcomes to more closely mimic clinical transplantation.
Several critical steps of this technique need to be considered. Previous methods involve the cuff insertion on the smaller external jugular vein into the large lumen of the donor pulmonary artery6,8. The placement of the larger cuff on the donor pulmonary artery to establish proper orientation with blood flow makes it slightly more difficult to insert the cuff into the smaller external jugular vein. Fixing the edge of the vein to the underlying tissue and only partially incising the vein's anterior wall facilitates the cuff insertion. Additionally, cuff placement on the recipient's common carotid artery can be quite challenging due to the small caliber of the vessel. As such, prior techniques have reported the utilization of smaller cuffs (e.g., 26 G) for this anastomosis12. However, the current approach utilizes a larger 24 G cuff to ensure adequate graft perfusion, which we believe may offer some survival benefits. Selecting larger recipient mice may help novice microsurgeons. Anchor sutures are removed following reperfusion, and the graft is not fixed in a proper orientation as others have described3. Thus, it is important to check that the graft is properly positioned and oriented prior to cervical skin closure to prevent twisting or torsion (Table 1). Excision of the right submandibular gland is performed to provide adequate space for the heart graft, thus avoiding graft compression following skin closure.
The model described here offers several advantages. By placing the cuffs on the donor pulmonary artery trunk and the recipient's common carotid artery, the cuff orientation aligns with the direction of the blood flow. This decreases the likelihood of turbulent flow and thrombus formation. Second, a larger 20 G pulmonary artery cuff is utilized to ensure ample return of blood flow to the recipient. Third, a larger 24 G cuff is placed on the common carotid artery to ensure adequate perfusion of the graft. Lastly, 10-0 nylon anchor sutures are used to fix the graft to underlying tissues and facilitate cuff insertion. These modifications help in overcoming the technical challenges of the procedure, prevent anastomotic turbulence, and reduce postoperative complications such as thrombus formation.
An important limitation of all mouse heart transplant models is that physiologic blood flow is not restored through the heart's chambers. Instead, these models rely on circulation through the coronary vessels. The consequences of this retrograde flow pattern on the graft's cellular injury and immune responses have not been clearly delineated; however, it is possible that mechanical shear forces resulting from this non-physiologic circulation influence immune responses. A surgical model of heart transplantation in mice that restores physiologic blood flow is yet to be developed and would require substantial technical advances. It is observed that a small proportion of mice (<3%) experience transient erratic behavior (e.g., running in circles) following the procedure. This behavior lasts for approximately 1-2 h before resolution. Given that this behavior is not observed after other procedures using the same anesthetic regimen, it may be related to transient cerebral ischemia due to blood flow alterations after cervical heart transplantation. Full recovery has occurred in all mice without any chronic deficits observed.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
DK is supported by National Institutes of Health grants 1P01AI116501, R01HL094601, R01HL151078, Veterans Administration Merit Review grant 1I01BX002730, and The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital.
6-0 braided silk ties | Henry Schein Inc | 7718729 | |
0.75% Providone iosine scrub | Priority Care Inc | NDC 57319-327-0 | |
10-0 nylon suture | Surgical Specialties Corporation | AK-0106 | |
655-nm nontargeted Q-dots | Invitrogen | Q21021MP | |
70% Ethanol | Pharmco Products Inc | 111000140 | |
8-0 braided silk ties | Henry Schein Inc | 1005597 | |
Adson forceps | Fine Science Tools Inc | 91127-12 | |
BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice (6-8 weeks) | Jackson Laboratories | ||
Bipolar coagulator | Valleylab Inc | SurgII-20, E6008/E6008B | |
Carprofen (Rimadyl) injection | Transpharm | 35844 | |
Carprofen (Rimadyl) oral chewable tablet | Transpharm | 38995/37919 | |
Custom-built 2P microscope running ImageWarp acquisition software | A&B Software | ||
Dumont no. 5 forceps | Fine Science Tools Inc | 11251-20 | |
Fine vannas style spring scissors | Fine Science Tools Inc | 15000-03 | |
GraphPad Prism 5.0 | Sun Microsystems Inc. | ||
Halsey needle holder | Fine Science Tools Inc | 91201-13 | |
Halsted-Mosquito clamp curved tip | Fine Science Tools Inc | 91309-12 | |
Harvard Apparatus mouse ventilator model 687 | Harvard Apparatus | MA1 55-0001 | |
Heparin solution (100 U/mL) | Abraxis Pharmaceutical Products | 504031 | |
Imaris | Bitplane | ||
Ketamine (50 mg/kg) | Wyeth | 206205-01 | |
Microscope—Leica Wild M651 × 6–40 magnification | Leica Microsystems | ||
Moria extra fine spring scissors | Fine Science Tools Inc | 15396-00 | |
Ohio isoflurane vaporizer | Parkland Scientific | V3000i | |
Qdots | ThermoFisher | 1604036 | |
S&T SuperGrip Forceps angled tip | Fine Science Tools Inc | 00649-11 | |
S&T SuperGrip Forceps straight tip | Fine Science Tools Inc | 00632-11 | |
Sterile normal saline (0.9% (wt/vol) sodium chloride | Hospira Inc | NDC 0409-4888-20 | |
Sterile Q-tips (tapered mini cotton tipped 3-inch applicators) | Puritan Medical Company LLC | 823-WC | |
Surflow 20 gauge 1/4-inch Teflon angiocatheter | Terumo Medical Corporation | SR-OX2032CA | |
Surflow 24 gauge 3/4-inch Teflon angiocatheter | Terumo Medical Corporation | R-OX2419CA | |
ThermoCare Small Animal ICU System (recovery settings 3 L/min O2, 80 °C, 40% humidity) | Thermocare Inc | ||
VetBond | Santa Cruz Biotechnology SC361931 | NC0846393 | |
Xylazine (10 mg/kg) | Lloyd Laboratories | 139-236 |