An imaging-based method is described that can be used to identify S-phase and analyze cell cycle dynamics in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germline using the thymidine analog EdU. This method requires no transgenes and is compatible with immunofluorescent staining.
Cell cycle analysis in eukaryotes frequently utilizes chromosome morphology, expression and/or localization of gene products required for various phases of the cell cycle, or the incorporation of nucleoside analogs. During S-phase, DNA polymerases incorporate thymidine analogs such as EdU or BrdU into chromosomal DNA, marking the cells for analysis. For C. elegans, the nucleoside analog EdU is fed to the worms during regular culture and is compatible with immunofluorescent techniques. The germline of C. elegans is a powerful model system for the studies of signaling pathways, stem cells, meiosis, and cell cycle because it is transparent, genetically facile, and meiotic prophase and cellular differentiation/gametogenesis occur in a linear assembly-like fashion. These features make EdU a great tool to study dynamic aspects of mitotically cycling cells and germline development. This protocol describes how to successfully prepare EdU bacteria, feed them to wild-type C. elegans hermaphrodites, dissect the hermaphrodite gonad, stain for EdU incorporation into DNA, stain with antibodies to detect various cell cycle and developmental markers, image the gonad and analyze the results. The protocol describes the variations in the method and analysis for the measurement of S-phase index, M-phase index, G2 duration, cell cycle duration, rate of meiotic entry, and rate of meiotic prophase progression. This method can be adapted to study the cell cycle or cell history in other tissues, stages, genetic backgrounds, and physiological conditions.
In animal development, hundreds, thousands, millions, billions, or even trillions of cell divisions are required to form the adult organism. The cell cycle, the set of cellular events composed of G1 (gap), S (synthesis), G2 (gap), and M (mitosis) define the series of events that are executed each cell division. The cell cycle is dynamic and best appreciated in real time, which can be technically difficult. The techniques presented in this protocol allow one to make the measurements of the phases and timing of the cell cycle from still images.
Labeling with nucleoside analogs such as 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) or 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) is the gold standard to identify S-phase in the studies of cell cycle dynamics in the Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) adult hermaphrodite germline1,2,3,4,5. Both EdU and BrdU can be used in nearly any genetic background, as they do not rely on any genetic construct. Visualizing BrdU requires harsh chemical treatment to expose the antigen for anti-BrdU antibody staining, which is often incompatible with the assessment of other cellular markers visualized by co-staining with additional antibodies. By contrast, visualizing EdU occurs by click chemistry under mild conditions and thus is compatible with antibody co-staining6,7.
The specificity of the label is clear, since nuclei only incorporate the thymidine (5-ethynyl-2'- deoxyuridine) analogs into DNA during S-phase. Visualization takes place in fixed tissue. The EdU label is invisible by itself until an azide-containing dye or fluorophore reacts covalently with the alkyne in EdU by copper-catalyzed click chemistry8. EdU labeling can provide immediate information on which nuclei are in S-phase, using a short pulse of labeling. EdU can also provide dynamic information, using pulse-chase or continuous labeling; for example, in a pulse-chase experiment, the label is diluted at each cell division or propagated as nondividing cells progress through development.
The C. elegans hermaphrodite germline is a powerful model system for the studies of signaling pathways, stem cells, meiosis, and cell cycle. The adult germline is a polarized assembly-line with stem cells found at the distal end followed by entry and progression through meiotic prophase, coordinated with the stages of gametogenesis more proximally (Figure 1). At the proximal end, oocytes mature, are ovulated and fertilized and begin embryogenesis in the uterus9,10,11. The ~20 cell-diameter long region near the distal tip cell, which includes the mitotically cycling germline stem, progenitor cells and meiotic S-phase cells but not the cells in meiotic prophase, is called the progenitor zone2,4,9,12. The cell membranes provide incomplete separation between the nuclei in the distal germline, but the progenitor zone cells undergo mitotic cell cycling largely independently. The median mitotic cell cycle duration of germline progenitor zone cells in young adult hermaphrodites is ~6.5 h; G1 phase is brief or absent, and quiescence is not observed1,2,13. Germline stem cell differentiation occurs through essentially direct differentiation and thus lacks transit-amplifying divisions4. During differentiation in the pachytene stage, approximately 4 out of 5 nuclei will not form oocytes but instead undergo apoptosis, acting as nurse cells by donating their cytoplasmic contents to the developing oocyte12,14,15.
In addition to labeling cells in S-phase with nucleoside analogs, one can identify the cells in mitosis and meiosis using antibody staining. Nuclei in mitosis are immunoreactive to anti-phospho-histone H3 (Ser10) antibody (called pH3)7,16. Nuclei in meiosis are immunoreactive to anti-HIM-3 antibody (a meiotic chromosome axis protein)17. Nuclei in the progenitor zone can be identified by the absence of HIM-3, the presence of nucleoplasmic REC-818, or the presence of WAPL-119. WAPL-1 intensity is highest in the somatic gonad, high in the progenitor zone, and low during early meiotic prophases19. Several cell cycle measurements are possible with a few variations in the protocol: I) identify nuclei in S-phase and measure S-phase index; II) Identify nuclei in M-phase and measure the M-phase index; III) determine whether nuclei were in mitotic or meiotic S-phase; IV) measure the duration of G2; V) measure the duartion of G2+M+G1 phases; VI) measure the rate of meiotic entry; VII) estimate the rate of meiotic progression.
One can make multiple cell cycle measurements from only a few types of wet-lab experiments. The protocol below describes a 30 min pulse labeling by feeding C. elegans adult hermaphrodites with EdU labeled bacteria and co-labeling M-phase cells by staining with anti-pH3 antibody and progenitor zone cells by staining with anti-WAPL-1 antibody. Only changes in the duration of EdU feed (Step 2.5), type of antibodies employed (Step 5), and analyses (Step 8.3) are required for the additional measurements.
1. Preparation of EdU-labeled Bacteria
2. Feeding EdU to C. elegans
3. Dissection and Fixation of C. elegans Germline
NOTE: This protocol for the dissection, fixation, and antibody staining of the C. elegans hermaphrodite germline is nearly identical to that published by Gervaise and Arur (2016)22, except that the 1 mL glass tubes can be centrifuged to speed up washing steps and a drawn-out glass Pasteur pipette can be used to remove the liquid from 1 mL glass tubes more effectively.
4. Rehydrate Germlines
5. Detect Antigens with Antibodies
6. Perform the EdU Click Reaction to Detect EdU
NOTE: Performing the EdU click reaction before the antibody staining steps (perform Step 6 before Step 5) is possible, depending on the antibodies used7. However, the click reagents may interfere with certain antigens (e.g., REC-8 antibody is sensitive to fixation and permeabilization). The order presented here yields bright antibody staining with the REC-8, WAPL-1, HIM-3, pH3, FLAG, and CYE-1 antibodies used, among others.
7. Stain DNA and Prepare Slides
8. Confocal Imaging and Analysis
Since DNA synthesis is required to incorporate EdU, one can conclude that EdU-labeled nuclei underwent S-phase during the EdU-labeling time window. One may interpret the nuclei that label in a 30 min feeding with EdU labeled bacteria as nuclei in S-phase at the time of dissection. Nuclei that label in a longer continuous EdU feeding experiment may have labeled early in the time window and since left S-phase, or may have labeled in the late part of the EdU time window. EdU signal co-localizes with DAPI signal. In some nuclei, EdU signal covers all chromosomes, while in other nuclei EdU signal localizes to 1–2 bright puncta (Figure 4). These puncta are likely the X-chromosome, which replicates late in S-phase13.
Here, the animals were fed with EdU continuously for 30 min and dissected, as described above and in Figure 5. One example of successful EdU staining in a young adult animal and one example of unsuccessful EdU staining in an older adult animal (see below) are shown in Figure 4. EdU signal from a 30 min labeling localizes to approximately half of the nuclei in the progenitor zone (defined by WAPL-1 antibody labeling but approximated by DAPI morphology26,27,28). S-phase index, the proportion of the progenitor zone that is EdU positive, was previously reported at 57 ±5% and as high as 70% in young adults1,2,3. M-phase index is approximately 2–3%1,29. In continuous feeding for 4 h or longer, all nuclei in the progenitor zone label with EdU, and some nuclei that labeled in the progenitor zone have since entered meiotic prophase1.
While the technique works consistently in wild-type young adult animals, a significant fraction of mated 5 day old hermaphrodites (even those containing sperm) failed to label in a 30 min EdU pulse (Figure 4E). However, with a 4 h EdU feeding, nearly all these animals label. Sporadic failure to label in genetic female animals with short pulses of EdU has also been reported30. There may be other situations that result in sporadic failure to label.
One can calculate the duration of the cell cycle by performing several EdU-labeling experiments with pH3 labeling in each. The duration of G2 was estimated by analyzing the percent of nuclei in M-phase (pH3 immunoreactive) that were EdU positive during the time course (Figure 6). This approach gives median and maximum duration of G2 (Figure 3A). The median time was interpolated, showing an approximate G2 duration of 2.5 h in young adult hermaphrodites. The duration of G2+M+G1 was estimated from the percentage of all progenitor zone nuclei (WAPL-1 immunoreactive) that were EdU positive (Figure 6). The G2+M+G1 method provides a maximum duration measure for the combined phases (Figure 3B). The 99th percentile time was interpolated, showing an approximate G2+M+G1 duration of 3.4 h in young adult hermaphrodites. Data from the same experiments were used to calculate the rate of meiotic entry (nuclei per h). The rate is the slope of the linear regression of the number of nuclei that entered meiosis (EdU positive, WAPL-1 negative or HIM-3 positive) over the duration of the EdU label (Figure 3C). The values for wild-type 1 day old adult hermaphrodites are shown in Table 2.
Figure 1: Diagram of C. elegans germline and cell cycle. (A) The cell cycle of germ cells in the young adult hermaphrodite germline. Numbers indicate the approximate percentage of time spent in each cell cycle stage. (B) C. elegans hermaphrodites have two U-shaped germlines (red and blue). The spermatheca is shown in yellow and the uterus with developing embryos is shown in dark gray. The dashed orange line indicates where animals are dissected to extrude the germlines. (C) Diagram of an unfolded C. elegans germline. DAPI (blue) is a DNA dye that highlights nuclear morphology. The distal progenitor zone (highlighted in red based on WAPL-1 antibody staining) contains mitotically cycling stem cells, progenitor cells, and cells in meiotic S-phase (WAPL-1 also labels somatic gonad nuclei). Cells in mitotic and meiotic S-phase label with a 30 min EdU pulse and are indicated in green. Two cells in M-phase label with pH3 antibody and are shown in black. The distal tip cell (DTC) provides the GLP-1/Notch ligand to maintain the stem cell fate of these cells. As the cells migrate away from the DTC, they exit the progenitor zone and enter meiotic prophase. Yellow cells are sperm in the spermatheca. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Venn diagram of the classes of nuclei. Nuclei are grouped by the presence and absence of three markers: WAPL-1 indicates progenitor zone cells (red), EdU indicates S-phase cells (green), and pH3 indicates M-phase cells (blue). Cell types are identified as A-G. Note that in wild-type young adult hermaphrodites cells of type F are not found, and cells do not co-label with EdU and pH3 outside of the (WAPL-1 positive) progenitor zone. The distal gonad diagram below indicates one example of A-E and G nuclei. See Table 1 for more detail. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Graphical presentation of cell cycle duration and rate of meiotic entry experimental data. (A) The duration of G2 phase is interpolated from pH3 and EdU co-labeling following varied-duration EdU pulses Gray lines indicate 50th and 99th percentiles used in interpolating median and maximum G2 durations, indicated by arrows. (B) A cell in G2, M, or G1 phase does not incorporate EdU. Thus, the maximum duration of G2+M+G1 phase can be estimated by measuring the maximum duration of EdU label that yields EdU-negative cells. The duration of G2+M+G1 phase is interpolated from EdU and REC-8 co-labeling following varied-duration EdU pulses. Gray line indicates 99th percentile used in interpolating maximum G2+M+G1 duration, indicated by an arrow. It is not possible to interpolate the median G2+M+G1 duration. (C) The rate of meiotic entry (in nuclei per h – see Table 2) is calculated from the slope of the regression line. Note that since the y-intercept intercept is not zero, a regression is necessary for an accurate calculation of the rate of meiotic entry (C). . Error bars indicate standard deviation. Figures modified and reprinted with permission from Fox et al. 20111. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Example of successful and unsuccessful 30 min EdU staining. Confocal microscope images of a 1 day old (A-D) and a 5 day old (E-H) hermaphrodite gonad (not sperm depleted) after a 30 min EdU labeling experiment. The dashed white line marks the end of the progenitor zone. The asterisk marks the position of the distal tip. Green marks EdU staining visualized by click chemistry (A). Unsuccessful EdU labeling results in low-level background staining but no bright EdU+ nuclei (E). Red marks WAPL-1 immunofluorescence (B,F). Yellow indicates overlap (C, G). Blue marks DAPI staining for DNA (D, H). Single arrowheads indicate a nucleus with EdU staining throughout the chromatin. Double arrowheads indicate a nucleus with EdU puncta on only one pair of chromosomes. Images were obtained with a 63X objective. Scale bar = 10 µm (D, H). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Experimental Workflow. A summary of the experimental protocol to grow (A), EdU label (B), dissect (C), antibody stain (D), perform the click reaction to attach a dye to EdU (E), stain DNA (F), image germlines (G), and quantify EdU labeled and antibody stained nuclei (H). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Example of successful 4 h EdU staining. Confocal microscope images of a 1 day old adult hermaphrodite gonad after a 4 h EdU labeling experiment. The dashed white line marks the end of the progenitor zone. The asterisk marks the position of the distal tip. Magenta marks pH3 immunofluorescence (A, C). Green marks EdU staining visualized by click chemistry (B,C). Red marks WAPL-1 immunofluorescence (D). Yellow indicates the overlap of EdU and WAPL-1 (E). Blue marks DAPI staining for DNA (F). Single arrowheads indicate nuclei co-labeled with EdU and pH3. Double arrowhead marks a pH3+ EdU- nucleus – a rare occurrence in a 4 h EdU labeling. Arrows mark EdU+ WAPL-1 – nuclei which have entered meiosis. Images were obtained with a 63X objective. A 10 µm scale bar is shown (F). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Marker: | pH3 | EdU* | WAPL-1 or REC-8 | HIM-3 | |
Interpretation: | Mitosis | S-phase* | Progenitor Zone | Meiosis | |
Class: | Combined Interpretation: | ||||
A | in M-phase, in progenitor zone, were in mitotic S-phase during EdU label (completed G2) | ||||
B | in M-phase, in progenitor zone, were not in S-phase during EdU label | ||||
C | in Interphase, in progenitor zone, were in S-phase during EdU label | ||||
D | in Interphase, in progenitor zone, were not in S-phase during EdU label | ||||
E | in meiosis, were in meiotic S-phase during EdU label (meiotic entry nuclei) | ||||
F | return to mitosis (found in some mutants) or meiotic divisions (in spermatogenesis) | ||||
G | in meiosis, were not in S-phase during EdU label | ||||
sum total pH3 positive; all cells in M-phase | sum total EdU positive; all cells in S-phase | sum total WAPL-1 positive; all cells in progenitor zone | sum total HIM-3 positive; all cells in meiotic prophase |
Table 1: Classes of nuclei. *Note that 30 min and 4 h EdU experiments differ in interpretation. In longer duration EdU experiments, cells have likely progressed beyond S-phase. See Introduction and Step 8 for duration of EdU labeling for relevant experiment.
Cell cycle part | Operational Definition | Calculation* | Value** |
Progenitor Zone nuclei | all WAPL-1 (or REC-8) positive, HIM-3 negative nuclei | A+B+C+D | 231 ± 23 nuclei |
S-phase nuclei | nuclei EdU positive after 30 min EdU label and WAPL-1 positive | A+C | 133 ± 20 nuclei |
M-phase nuclei | pH3 and WAPL-1 co-positive nuclei | A+B | 5.2 ± 2.3 nuclei |
S-phase index | S-phase nuclei / Progenitor Zone nuclei | A+C/ A+B+C+D | 57% of cell cycle |
M-phase index | M-phase nuclei / Progenitor Zone nuclei | A+B/ A+B+C+D | 2% of cell cycle |
Meiotic Entry cells | EdU labeled nuclei in meiosis | E | varies by duration of EdU label |
Meiotic Entry rate | Meiotic entry nuclei per h of EdU label | Slope from Figure 4C*** | 20.3 nuclei per h |
G2 duration (median) | 50% intercept from Figure4A | 2.5 h | |
G2 duration (maximum) | 99% intercept from Figure 4A | 3.5 h | |
G2+M+G1 duration (maximum) | 99% intercept from Figure 4B | 3.5 h | |
Cell cycle duration (median) | median G2 duration / G2-index**** | 6.5 h | |
Cell cycle duration (maximum) | maximum G2 duration / G2-index**** | 8.1 h |
Table 2: Cell cycle calculations. *Letters represent the classes of nuclei defined in Table 1 and Figure 3. Calculations are modified from Fox et al. 20111. **Values (± standard deviation) for wild-type hermaphrodites raised at 20 °C aged to 24 h post mid-L4 stage. ***Note that since the y-intercept intercept is not zero, a regression is necessary for an accurate calculation of the rate of meiotic entry. ****The G2-index is determined by subtracting the S-phase index, M-phase index, and approximate G1-index (2%) from 100%, as described by Fox et al. 20111.
Preparation of EdU-labeled bacteria (step 1) is critical for this protocol, and the first point for troubleshooting. Wild-type young adult hermaphrodites label very reliably in a 4 h EdU-pulse, making this a useful control for every new batch of EdU-labeled bacteria. Additionally, intact EdU-labeled bacteria that enter the intestine (in older animals or certain pharynx/grinder defective mutants) will label with click chemistry and appear as bright oblong puncta in the gut. An alternative technique for labeling hermaphrodites uses a “soak” in a high concentration (1 mM) of EdU3. This technique starves the animals for the duration of labeling, but provides a useful way to bypass making EdU-labeled bacteria when troubleshooting fixation and click chemistry. If an EdU “soak” experiment is successful while an EdU feed is not, then prepare fresh EdU-labeled bacteria. To reach a sufficient bacterial density while also achieving a high EdU content, one may need to adjust the concentrations of EdU and thymidine.
The main limitation of this technique for labeling of S-phase is in the need to feed EdU-labeled bacteria to animals. The animals that cannot feed (due to genotype or stage) may not be labeled with this technique. Nevertheless, nucleoside analogs are currently the only method to identify S-phase nuclei in the C. elegans germline, and their use does not require that any transgenes be present in the animals. Additionally, once incorporated, EdU remains in nuclei even as they exit S-phase, progress through the cell cycle, divide, or differentiate. The signal weakens by half with every cell division. This makes EdU perfect for tracking a cell’s history even through a few cell divisions.
The stability of EdU makes pulse-chase experiments straightforward; simply rinse excess EdU bacteria from the animals after the desired duration pulse is finished and transfer the animals to unlabeled bacteria. EdU remains in DNA and remains visible even after multiple cell divisions. However, the experiments are limited to a single type of S-phase label (a single pulse of EdU). Co-labeling with EdU and BrdU is possible in mammalian cells31 but has not been reported in C. elegans. Co-labeling of IdU and CldU is used in mammals32 but also has not been reported in C. elegans.
The main advantages of EdU labeling are that the method requires no transgenes, EdU can be fed to C. elegans during regular culture, the chemistry is compatible with immunofluorescent techniques, and EdU persists in DNA for a long time after feeding has stopped. These features make EdU a great tool to study many aspects of the cell cycle and germ cell dynamics.
Cell cycle and germ cell dynamics analysis with EdU can be applied to a variety of research questions. Just a few examples of further applications of this method: How do the dynamics of the cell cycle change in animals with cell cycle gene mutations? How do physiological conditions affect the cell cycle in stem cells, the rate of germ cell entry into meiotic prophase, and the rate of germ cell progression through meiotic prophase? How does the cell cycle change during larval development? How do major signaling pathway disruptions affect the cell cycle, in addition to changes in cell fate (such as ectopic proliferation)? This system can be modified to study what the cells are doing in many different conditions.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We are grateful to the E. coli stock center for MG1693; Wormbase; the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center which is funded by the National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40OD010440) for strains; Zach Pincus for statistical advice; Aiping Feng for reagents; Luke Schneider, Andrea Scharf, Sandeep Kumar, and John Brenner for training, advice, support, and helpful discussion; and the Kornfeld and Schedl labs for feedback on this manuscript. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health [R01 AG02656106A1 to KK, R01 GM100756 to TS] and a National Science Foundation predoctoral fellowship [DGE-1143954 and DGE-1745038 to ZK]. Neither the National Institutes of Health nor the National Science Foundation had any role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, nor in writing the manuscript.
E. coli MG1693 | Coli Genetic Stock Center | 6411 | grows fine in standard unsupplemented LB |
E. coli OP50 | Caenorhabditis Genetics Center | OP50 | |
Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor 488 Imaging Kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | C10337 | |
5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine | Sigma | 900584-50MG | or use EdU provided in kit |
Glucose | Sigma | D9434-500G | D-(+)-Dextrose |
Thiamine (Vitamin B1) | Sigma | T4625-5G | Reagent Grade |
Thymidine | Sigma | T1895-1G | BioReagent |
Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate | Sigma | M1880-1KG | MgSO4, Reagent Grade |
Sodium Phosphate, dibasic, anhydrous | Fisher | BP332-500G | Na2HPO4 |
Potassium Phosphate, monobasic | Sigma | P5379-500G | KH2PO4 |
Ammonium Chloride | Sigma | A4514-500G | NH4Cl, Reagent Plus |
Bacteriological Agar | US Biological | C13071058 | |
Calcium Chloride dihydrate | Sigma | C3881-500G | CaCl |
LB Broth (Miller) | Sigma | L3522-1KG | Used at 25g/L |
Levamisole | Sigma | L9756-5G | 0.241g/10ml |
Phosphate buffered saline | Calbiochem Omnipur | 6506 | homemade PBS works just as well |
Tween-20 | Sigma | P1379-500ML | |
16% Paraformaldehyde, EM-grade ampules | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 15710 | 10ml ampules |
100% methanol | Thermo Fisher Scientific | A454-1L | Gold-label methanol is critical for proper morphology with certain antibodies |
Goat Serum | Gibco | 16210-072 | Lot 1671330 |
rabbit-anti-WAPL-1 | Novus biologicals | 49300002 | Lot G3048-179A02, used at 1:2000 |
mouse-anti-pH3 clone 3H10 | Millipore | 05-806 | Lot#2680533, used at 1:500 |
goat-anti-rabbit IgG-conjugated Alexa Fluor 594 | Invitrogen | A11012 | Lot 1256147, used at 1:400 |
goat-anti-mouse IgG-conjugated Alexa Fluor 647 | Invitrogen | A21236 | Lot 1511347, used at 1:400 |
Vectashield antifade mounting medium containing 4',6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole Dihydrochloride (DAPI) | Vector Laboratories | H-1200 | mounting medium without DAPI can be used instead, following a separate DAPI incubation |
nail polish | Wet n Wild | DTC450B | any clear nail polish should work |
S-medium | various | see wormbook.org for protocol | |
M9 buffer | various | see wormbook.org for protocol | |
M9 agar | various | same recipe as M9 buffer, but add 1.7% agar | |
Nematode Growth Medium | various | see wormbook.org for protocol | |
dissecting watch glass | Carolina Biological | 42300 | |
Parafilm laboratory film | Pechiney Plastic Packaging | PM-996 | 4 inch wide laboratory film |
petri dishes | 60 mm diameter | ||
Long glass Pasteur pipettes | |||
1ml centrifuge tubes | MidSci Avant | 2926 | |
Tips | |||
Serological pipettes | |||
500 mL Erlenmyer flask | |||
Aluminum foil | |||
25G 5/8” needles | BD PrecisionGlide | 305122 | |
5ml glass centrifuge tube | Pyrex | ||
Borosilicate glass tubes 1ml | |||
glass slides | |||
no 1 coverslips 22 x 40 mm | no 1.5 may work, also | ||
37 °C Shaker incubator | |||
Tabletop Centrifuge | |||
Clinical Centrifuge | IEC | 428 | with 6 swinging bucket rotor |
Mini Centrifuge | |||
20 °C incubator | |||
4 °C refrigerator | |||
-20 °C freezer | |||
Observer Z1 microscope | Zeiss | ||
Plan Apo 63X 1.4 oil-immersion objective lens | Zeiss | ||
Ultraview Vox spinning disc confocal system | PerkinElmer | Nikon spinning disc confocal system works very well, also, as described here: http://wucci.wustl.edu/Facilities/Light-Microscopy |