We present a protocol of personalized script-driven trauma-related imagery and clinical assessments within a comparison design for investigating peritraumatic dissociation (PD), psychophysiological reactions, i.e. heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC), and psychological features of often severely traumatized individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD).
This protocol offers a detailed description of a psychophysiological experiment using script-driven trauma-related imagery and standardized clinical instruments within a comparative design assessing physiological and psychopathological features of individuals with BPD. This method aims at studying the psychological and physiological effects of trauma-related dissociation. Since the psychodiagnostic classification of trauma-related disorders relies on the observation of evolutionarily determined responses to life-threat, an integrated assessment paradigm for the study of reactions to traumatic memories proposes a very appropriate methodological approach.
The employed script-driven imagery paradigm uses individual recall instructions to activate trauma-related memory networks and prompt associated emotional and physiological responses. These responses are measured by means of self-rating scales and physiological assessments. During the individual recall, participants are asked to vividly imagine traumatic and everyday experiences and other situations triggered by short personalized verbal scripts they authored beforehand together with the experimenters. A wide range of affective reactions and different physiological parameters can be measured. We used this paradigm to investigate dissociative states in BPD and to find physiological and affective correlates of dissociative states. Some of the participants were having severe traumatic antecedents.
To investigate different reaction patterns within the same diagnostic group, participants with different levels of traumatic histories, symptom severities, and co-morbidities should be included. By using short verbal scripts, the level of stress induced to participants is held as low as possible without affecting the validity of the object of investigation.
In perceiving danger, humans experience anxiety and the body reacts rapidly within the defense cascade to minimize injury and ensure survival. Defense reactions include initial stages of increasing arousal and sympathetic activation and, in event of inescapable threats (e.g., child abuse, rape, torture), parasympathetically modulated "shut-down" dissociative reactions (e.g., bradycardia, vasodilatation, sensory deafferentation, alterations of consciousness and speech1,2) become predominant. According to the theories of reactivation of trauma-related associative memory networks3,4, the prevalent type of the peritraumatic psychophysiological reactions (arousal vs. dissociation) would result in one of the two major subtypes of clinical profiles and reaction patterns to trauma-related stimuli2. Considering the heterogeneity of responses to activation of trauma-related memory across various neuroimaging PTSD studies, Lanius et al. (2006)5 argued that "grouping all PTSD subjects, regardless of their different symptom patterns, in the same diagnostic category may interfere with our understanding of posttrauma psychopathology". The influence of dissociative responding on the psychopathology and psychophysiology of traumatized persons has been studied in the area of PTSD. For example, Schalinski, Elbert & Schauer (2011)6 showed that shut-down dissociation predicts PTSD and other comorbid disorders. The use of psychophysiological assessments pointed to modifications of the defense cascade allowing for a rapid flight in response to threat7,8. Schalinski et al. (2013)8 revealed that the type of traumatic events seems to influence the cardiac startle response. Another study9 indicated a pattern of "blunted" reactivity — an arousal-dissociation mix characterized by simultaneous activation of both autonomous nervous system branches — in more severely traumatized individuals. So far, no studies in this regard have been conducted on other clinical populations often affected by psychological trauma and dissociative symptoms (e.g., BPD).
In the research of human emotion and behavior, it is of particular importance to examine and integrate information from several levels: subjective (verbal expression, prosody), behavioral (motor, facial expression, etc.), physiological (trembling, sweating, heart rate, etc.). By arguing that assessments that omit one or more of these three modes of emotional expression can be highly misleading, Lang (1998)10 emphasized the relevance of multimodal assessment that involves procedures of observation of behavior, self-report/clinical measures, and psychophysiological measurement.
Extreme states of anxiety and pronounced physiological arousal are characteristic of anxiety, trauma-, and stressor-related disorders. According to the psychophysiological concept, these disorders may be conceived as an outcome of the modified autonomic reactivity (generally higher) to negative stimuli. These measurable psychophysiological response indices as part of the diagnostic criteria made them obvious targets for psychophysiological research. Particularly PTSD, as a psychological disorder with a definite event criterion (i.e., life-threatening experiences, such as accidents, physical/sexual assaults, natural disasters, incarceration, military combat, and torture), offered a valuable opportunity for psychophysiological assessments.
Various assessment designs using different paradigms, stimuli, and physiological parameters have been used for the study of PTSD. Monitoring peripheral physiological parameters provide reliable measures of changes in autonomic activity, related to emotional and cognitive states. Among these, skin conductance is a common measure with a long history in psychophysiological research and is regarded as a highly sensitive index11. Its monitoring is often combined with the recording of heart rate, a further autonomically dependent variable.
For the measurement of peripheral physiological parameters, the use of script-driven imagery experiments was a major paradigm for the investigation of emotional and physiological reactions to the activation of trauma-related memory. Within the script-driven imagery paradigm12, participants are asked to vividly imagine aversive situations triggered by short verbal scripts13,14,15,16. The subject is solicited to imagine a situation as if he/she was reliving the real course of events, including actions, persons, and emotions present during the real situation (see Figure 1 for an example of a traumatic script). The traumatic situation imagined is usually compared with other kinds of not-traumatic scenes.
Script-driven imagery was mainly employed in various populations affected by PTSD, e.g. Vietnam veterans15,17, victims of accidents18, and former political prisoners19. An enhanced reactivity to traumatic cues was usually found, but there are also several findings of absence of such a higher reactivity to trauma-related stimuli (e.g., Orr & Roth, 2000; Davis et al., 1996)15,20. Growing knowledge on the psychophysiology of PTSD was followed by an increased bulk of psychophysiological research in the area of trauma-related and other psychological disorders. Meanwhile, however, script-driven imagery paradigms have been successfully applied to study dissociative processes in BPD 21,22.
This paper presents a protocol to investigate whether persons with BPD reporting high levels of PD predominantly exhibit dissociative reactions with suppression of autonomic responses during the script-driven trauma-related imagery23,24. Additionally, our study aimed at proving whether there are clinically different BPD subgroups, as tested by structured clinical interviews and symptom scales. The present protocol combines extensive, standardized clinical assessments with measuring physiological (HR and SC) and subjective responses within a script-driven imagery paradigm. Reactions to trauma-related personalized scripts compared to scripts portraying everyday events were analyzed. The protocol provides a model for the investigation of dissociative processes and their impact on psychopathological and psychophysiological features of BPD.
Our study was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Ulm University. All investigation proceedings were non-invasive and conducted in accordance with the guidelines for good clinical practice and the Declaration of Helsinki.
1. General procedures for the preparation of the psychophysiological experiment
2. Participant selection
NOTE: For the selection and recruitment of the clinical study participants, available standards were considered (Sullivan-Bolyai et al., 2007)25.
3. Clinical assessment
4. Procedures for the preparation of the psychophysiological experiment for each participant
5. Psychophysiological experiment
NOTE: Experimental set-up: The experiment followed the guidelines of psychophysiological measurements for the measurement of reactions to emotional cues41.
There are many behaviors reflected in emotional and physiological reactions that can be studied by script-driven imagery paradigms. For instance, the design is suitable to investigate patterns of emotional and physiological response to trauma-related memory. We were particularly interested in verifying whether there is a distinct BPD subgroup mainly characterized by a dissociative reaction pattern.
In our study42, the assessments took place at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I of the University of Ulm/Centre for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg. The recruitment was realized at the in-patient section 2056 of the headquarters Weissenau, Centre for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg. We recruited 28 participants with a clinical diagnosis of BPD. The BPD group was divided according to the established cutoff score of 1.5 of the PDEQ questionnaire for a peritraumatic dissociative reaction (low vs. high): BPD and PD (n = 15) and BPD only (n = 13). A control group of 15 persons with trauma histories, but without trauma-related or other psychological disorders was recruited from the staff of the Centre for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg.
Our study investigated differences between groups with regard to physiological and psychological measures. Among representative findings demonstrating the efficacy of the protocol, significant group differences resulted with respect to the HR differences between trauma-related scripts and scripts of everyday events (positive and neutral), due to a significant decrease of HR during memory of traumatic events in participants with BPD and a history of PD as compared to the BPD only group and controls (Figure 3). Yet, the analyses of SC responses did not show such differences.
Regarding self-report ratings, traumatic memories triggered for instance more dissociation than both positive and neutral memories (Figure 4). Besides, subjects with BPD and PD rated all memories as more dissociation provoking than other BPD participants and controls. The analyses of clinical data added valuable insight in the clinical profiles of BPD participants affected by severe PD responses who also showed a higher traumatic exposure, more severe symptoms and more comorbid disorders than the other BPD participants in Table 1. A multiple linear regression analysis to determine predictors of HR responses to trauma-related memory within the clinical sample indicated that PD level was the strongest predictor, followed by borderline symptom severity and level of dissociative experiences (Table 2).
Figure 1. Example of a personalized trauma-related script for the use within a script-driven experiment. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Graphic representation of the experimental design. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Means (and SE) of heart rate responses (difference score trauma-related minus everyday scripts) during memory of traumatic situations, by groups. This figure has been modified from the original figure [Bichescu-Burian et al.38], with permission from Psychophysiology. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Means of self-rated levels of dissociation during memory of positive, neutral, and traumatic situations, by groups. This figure has been modified from the original figure [Bichescu-Burian et al.38], with permission from Psychophysiology. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
(A) | ||||
BPD and PD (n = 15) |
BPD only (n= 13) |
Control group (n =15) |
p | |
Demographics | ||||
Age, M (SD) | 25.53 (9.4) | 24.38 (8.8) | 23.87 (6.3) | n.s. |
Education (years), M (SD) | 10.40 (1.2) | 10.54 (1.3) | 11.13 (1.1) | n.s. |
Traumatic events | ||||
CAPS event types, M (SD) | 7.40 (2.9)a | 6.08 (3.0) | 3.87 (2.3)a | < .01 |
Rape/rape attempt (%) | 13 (86.7) | 8 (61.5) | 2 (13.3) | < .001 |
CTQ score, M (SD) | 88.47 (28.0)a | 69.54 (18.5) b | 39.67 (10.4) a, b | < .001 |
Emotional abuse (SD) | 18.27 (6.7)a | 14.62 (5.9)a, b | 7.67 (2.0)b | < .001 |
Emotional neglect (SD) | 19.27 (5.3)a | 16.31 (4.4)a, b | 9.60 (4.1)b | < .001 |
Physical abuse (SD) | 12.07 (6.0)a | 9.38 (6.1) | 5.53 (0.9)a | < .01 |
Physical neglect (SD) | 12.60 (4.3)a | 10.23 (3.1)a, b | 5.50 (0.8)b | < .001 |
Sexual abuse (SD) | 14.53 (8.3)a | 10.92 (7.1) | 6.67 (5.2)a | < .05 |
Unpredictability (SD) | 11.07 (3.9)a, b | 8.08 (3.2)a, c | 4.33 (2.2)b. c | < .001 |
PDEQ score (SD) | 2.71 (0.7)a, b | 1.21 (.2)a, b, c | 0.86 (0.6)c | < .001 |
Clinical symptoms | ||||
BSL score, M (SD) | 2.52 (0.8)a, b | 1.78 (0.7)a, c | 0.48 (0.4)b, c | < .001 |
DES score, M (SD) | 34.66 (20.9)a, b | 15.91 (11.8)a | 4.90 (2.5)b | < .001 |
SCL-14 score, M (SD) | 2.21 (0.9)a, b | 1.36 (.6)a, c | 0.18 (0.1)b, c | < .001 |
Note. Significant differences between each pair of groups as revealed by post hoc comparisons are marked by identical characters. | ||||
(B) | ||||
BPD and PD (n = 15) |
BPD only (n = 13) |
p | ||
Clinical symptoms | ||||
CAPS score, M (SD) | 83.7 (28.0) | 58.5 (25.9) | < .05 | |
GSI score of the SCL-90-R, M (SD) | 2.1 (0.7) | 1.3 (0.6) | < .01 | |
Diagnoses | ||||
PTSD, as diagnosed by CAPS (%) | 14 (93.3) | 7 (53.8) | < .05 | |
Dissociative disorder, based on SCID-D (%) | 12 (80.0) | 1 (7.7) | < .001 | |
Number of SCID-I diagnoses, M (SD) | 3.20 (1.5) | 1.77 (0.8) | < .01 | |
Major depression disorder, by SCID-I (%) | 10 (66.7) | 5 (38.5) | n.s. | |
Anxiety disorders, by SCID-I (%) | 8 (53.3) | 6 (46.2) | n.s. | |
Substance use disorders, by SCID-I (%) | 9 (60.0) | 1 (7.7) | < .01 | |
Eating disorders, by SCID-I (%) | 8 (53.3) | 2 (15.4) | < .05 | |
Obsessive-compulsive disorders, by SCID-I (%) | 4 (26.7) | 1 (7.7) | n.s. | |
Bipolar disorders, by SCID-I (%) | 1 (6.7) | 3 (23.1) | n.s. | |
Adjustment disorders, by SCID-I (%) | 1 (6.7) | 2 (15.4) | n.s. | |
Note. For continuous variables, t tests were calculated; for dichotomous variables, χ2 tests were applied. |
Table 1. Clinical and other characteristics (A) of the three groups and (B) of the two clinical groups. This table was published in Bichescu-Burian et al.42, with permission from Psychophysiology.
Model and significant predictor variables | R2 | df | p | B | SE | β | t | Partial regression p |
Model 1 | .42 | 5 | < .01 | |||||
PDEQ score | -5.81 | 1.96 | -.66 | -2.96 | < .01 | |||
BSL score | -5.67 | 3.37 | -.60 | -1.68 | n.s. | |||
DES score | -0.18 | 0.11 | -.47 | -1.66 | n.s. | |||
SCL-90-R score | -0.12 | 3.60 | -.01 | -0.03 | n.s. | |||
DSS-4 score | -0.05 | 0.75 | -.01 | -0.06 | n.s. | |||
Model 2 | .45 | 4 | < .01 | |||||
PDEQ score | -5.83 | 1.81 | -.66 | -3.22 | < .01 | |||
BSL score | -5.75 | 2.23 | -.60 | -2.57 | < .05 | |||
DES score | -0.18 | 0.10 | -.47 | -1.70 | n.s. | |||
DSS-4 score | -0.04 | 0.73 | -.01 | -0.06 | n.s. | |||
Model 3 | .48 | 3 | < .001 | |||||
PDEQ score | -5.85 | 1.74 | -.66 | -3.36 | < .01 | |||
BSL score | -5.77 | 2.15 | -.61 | -2.68 | < .05 | |||
DES score | -0.18 | 0.10 | -.47 | -1.75 | n.s. |
Table 2. Linear regression analyses within the BPD Sample (N = 28) for factors of HR responses to Traumatic Imagery. This table was published in Bichescu-Burian et al.42, with permission from Psychophysiology.
The present protocol describes an integrated assessment of peripheral physiological responding, self-reports, and clinical assessments for the study of trauma-related dissociation in BPD. For the realization of this procedure, it is important to control for confounders of physiological activity, to ensure functional recordings of physiological data before measurements, and to collect clinical data by expert investigators.
Limits of such integrated assessments protocols may concern the sensitivity and specificity of the measurement, the imperfect covariation between subjective and psychophysiological levels, the role of individual variability as well as the adequacy of the stimuli. Particularly for studies using such a protocol of integrated clinical and psychophysiological assessment, a main limitation is related to small sample sizes in the majority of cases, which do not allow a finer differentiation among subgroups clinical participants and allow the calculation of underpowered models, at best. Another limitation regards the main memory contents related to the selected scripts: Whereas trauma-related scripts reflect episodic memory, everyday experiences as comparison scripts may have also involved semantic contents. Yet in part inevitable, the cross-sectional design impedes causal conclusions and allows correlative implications at best. Moreover, the retrospective recall may be prone to serious biases and influenced by characteristics such as age, pathology, and affective state.
Another possible limitation concerns the assessment of trauma-related dissociation. There are findings in the area of PTSD weakening the proven impact of PD on PTSD symptoms and arguing for a major role of the persistence of dissociative responding over time (e.g., Briere et al., 2005; Werner & Griffin, 2012)43,44. Although in our study PD seemed to mainly influence later responding, the role of the time course of reactions and symptoms should not be underestimated in the search for alternative explanations. For this reason, the employed measures of state and trait dissociation should capture the actual level of persistent dissociation, such as the Shutdown Dissociation Scale (Shut-D)45.
This protocol has several advantages for researchers aiming to study trauma-related dissociation in clinical samples: Employing an integrated assessment with extensive psychodiagnostic testing and measurement of reliable peripheral psychophysiological parameters assure increased diagnostic validity and allows corroboration of findings across measures.
The further investigation of the role of trauma-related dissociation in the etiology of BPD and other clinical samples affected by psychological trauma should comprise larger samples, preferably prospective study designs, and a more thorough assessment of type, occurrence time, and number of traumatic events. Reactions to different types of aversive situations should be investigated, and several psychophysiological parameters should be involved. The selection of other clinical groups inclusive of resilient participants may provide significant clinically and therapeutically useful evidence.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We particularly thank Dr. Stefan Tschöke and Luisa Steib for scientific advice and assistance with the recruitment of clinical participants, as well as all participants who enabled us to conduct the study and learn from them.
Experimental Runtime System (ERTS) Version 3.32 | BeriSoft Cooperation, Frankfurt/Main, Germany | We used a scripting language based computer programme wich sends simultanously auditory stimuli to a headphone and marker signals to a psychophysiological recording device at millisecond accuracy. | |
Biopac MP150 system | Biopac Systems, Inc., Goleta, CA | We recorded the physiological data by using this hardware . | |
AcqKnowledge software | Biopac Systems, Inc. | We recorded the physiological data by using this software. | |
VOC | Format for the auditory files for instructions and script, compatibele with the stimulus presentation software. |