We demonstrate the procedure for intra-tracheal inoculation of Haemophilus influenzae into the lower respiratory tracts of mice. This is a very useful tool to study signaling pathways that regulate airway inflammation in mouse models.
Here, we describe a detailed procedure to efficiently and directly deliver Haemophilus influenzae into the lower respiratory tracts of mice. We demonstrate the procedure for preparing H. influenzae inoculum, intra-tracheal instillation of H. influenzae into the lung, collection of broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF), analysis of immune cells in the BALF, and RNA isolation for differential gene expression analysis. This procedure can be used to study the lung inflammatory response to any bacteria, virus or fungi. Direct tracheal instillation is mostly preferred over intranasal or aerosol inhalation procedures because it more efficiently delivers the bacterial inoculum into the lower respiratory tract with less ambiguity.
Inflammation is a fundamental immune mechanism of defense against infectious agents. It promotes pathogen eradication and repair of damaged tissue. It also facilitates the recovery to a normal healthy state1. However, dysregulated inflammation often leads to chronic inflammatory diseases2. Airway inflammation is an initial trigger for different pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma and pulmonary fibrosis3.
The non-typeable (unencapsulated) Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is associated with chronic upper and lower lung inflammatory diseases4,5. It is the dominant species isolated from the lower airways of children and adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4,6,7. The inflammatory response after NTHi infection is characterized by the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines (such as TNF and IL-1β), and it is mediated by mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) through toll-like receptors (TLRs)8.
Mouse models are very useful tools for analyzing the underlying pathology of lung inflammatory disease because of the availability of different gene-deficient lines. Several methods have been used to inoculate live/attenuated bacteria and bacterial products, including intranasal instillation and aerosolized inhalation9,10. Here, we demonstrate intra-tracheal instillation. Although used less frequently, this approach is more efficient and highly reproducible because of the direct delivery of the inoculum to the lower respiratory tract.
All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Baylor Research Institute.
1. Culturing Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) and Preparing the Inoculum
2. Intra-tracheal (i.t) Instillation
3. BALF Collection
4. Histopathology Preparation
5. FACS Staining Cells in the BALF
6. Homogenization of Lung Tissue to Isolate RNA
7. RNA Isolation from the Lung
Intra-tracheal instillation resulted in a markedly increased number of leukocytes in the BALF (Figure 1A, left panel) than installation with saline. The differential count analysis of the leukocytes clearly showed increased neutrophil infiltration (Figure 1, right panel). The FACS analysis of the cells in the BALF further confirmed the increased number of neutrophils (Figure 1B). Histological analysis of H&E-stained sections of the lung tissue showed increased airway inflammation (Figure 1C). These data collectively suggest that intra-tracheal instillation induces airway inflammation in mice. To support the use of this approach for studying signaling pathways that regulate airway pathogenesis, we used mice that are deficient for the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch. Itch is known to be involved in regulating inflammatory signaling pathways15. We inoculated age- and sex-matched wild type C57BL/6 control and Itch-/- mice with NTHi. We isolated RNA from the lung tissues of control WT and Itch-/- mice and performed whole transcriptome sequencing to identify the inflammatory genes that are differentially expressed. As shown in Figure 2, Itch deficiency resulted in differential expression of several genes. This suggests that intra-tracheal instillation can be used to investigate lung inflammation, gene expression profiles and signaling pathways.
Figure 1: Intra-tracheal inoculation of NTHi induces lung inflammation in mice. Mice were inoculated with NTHi (106 CFU/mouse) or a saline control. 24 hr after the inoculation, mice were sacrificed (A) BALF was collected. The total leukocyte, monocyte and neutrophil numbers were determined. Data are presented as means ± SEM. n = 4 mice/group. * Indicates p <0.05 compared to saline-treated mice. (B) The cells in the BALF were stained with anti-Gr1 antibody and analyzed by FACS. (C) H&E-stained lung sections showing leukocyte infiltration and inflammation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Differential gene expression in the lungs of WT and Itch-/- mice following intra-tracheal NTHi inoculation. 24 hr after NTHi inoculation, RNA was isolated from the lungs of two WT (1, 2) and two Itch-/-(1, 2) mice. (A) RNA quality was analyzed using a bioanalyzer. (B) Heat map showing Z-scores (interpreted as a measure of s.d. away from the mean) for the log2 count per million (log2 CPM) of 172 differentially expressed genes identified using edgeR in the Itch -/- compared to WT mice. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Herein, we describe a unique and minimally invasive procedure to inoculate the lungs of mice with a bacterial lung pathogen. We demonstrate that this procedure can be used to study the function of different genes using mice that are deficient in genes of inflammatory signaling pathways. This procedure can also be used to study the inflammatory responses to viral and fungal lung infections. The advantages of this procedure over other methods such as intranasal or aerosol inhalation are (1) in this procedure, the pathogenic inoculum is directly instilled to the lower respiratory tract; (2) the ability to control the inoculum size; and (3) reduced risk of bacterial exposure to the handler.
Exposure of the trachea surgically for instilling bacteria is a crucial step where care must be taken to avoid causing damage to surrounding tissues, especially the blood vessels.
Instillation of bacteria into the trachea should be done carefully to avoid the possibility of death of the mice due to asphyxiation. It is suggested that the inoculum (around 50 µl) be released slowly and air be injected before and after the inoculum. Keeping the mouse vertical following the instillation for a while and keeping them laterally recumbent facilitates faster recovery. The major disadvantage of this procedure is that multiple exposures within a short period of time are not possible due to the requirement of the surgery. A potential issue is that if the catheter is placed too deep in the bronchus, the BALF cell count will be lower. This problem can be solved by pulling the tube slightly upwards.
Since the incidence of airway inflammatory diseases are increasing worldwide3,16, understanding the pathophysiology of these diseases is of prime importance. The technologies described in this study could help to identify key regulatory pathways and could facilitate the development of new treatment modalities.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Dr. Carson Harrod for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Mr. Minghui Zeng and Drs. Mahesh Kathania and Prashant Khare for their contributions. This work was supported by grants from the American Cancer Society (Research Scholar grant, 122713-RSG-12-260-01-LIB) and the Sammons Cancer Center (Pilot Project grant) to K. Venuprasad.
Chocolate agar plate | Fisher Scientific | CAS50-99-7 | |
Dextrose Anhydrous | Themo Scientific | R01300 | |
Heparin | Hospira,Inc | RL-3010 | |
Deft quick solution | Sigma | GS500-500ML | |
Syringe needle 20/26G | BD | (REF305115/175) | |
Iml syringe | BD | REF 309602 | |
Catheter 20GA | BD | REF 381433 | |
Dissecting Scissors, straight, 10 cm long | kentscientific | INS600393 | |
Iris Forceps, serrated, 10cm long | kentscientific | INS650915 | |
Tweezer #5 Stainless steel, 11cm long | kentscientific | INS600095 | |
10% Formalin | Fisher Scientific | CAS 67-56-1 | |
Agarose | peqlab | 35-1020 | |
5ml polystyrene round-bottom tubes | BD | REF 352058 | |
1.5 ml Microcentrifuge tubes | Light Labs | A-7001-R | |
Reasy Mini kit | Qiagen | 74104 | |
Pellet pestile motor (Tissue homoginizer) | Sigma | Z359971-1EA | |
96 well microtiter plates V bottom | Thermo | 2605 | |
1X PBS | Gibco | 10010-023 | |
OneComp eBeads | eBioscience | 01-1111-42 | |
CD45.2-APC | eBioscience | 17-0454-81 | Working dilution 1:100 |
Ly-6G-eFlor 450 | eBioscience | 48-5931-82 | Working dilution 1:100 |
BSA | HyClone | SH30574.03 | |
RBC Lysis Buffer (10X) | Biolegend | 420301 | |
Live/Dead fixable aqua dead cell stain kit | Invitrogen | L-34957 | |
EDTA (0.5M) | lifetechnologies | 15575-020 | |
CD16/CD32 FcBlock | BD | 553142 | |
Facs tubes polystyrene round bottom tube | BD | 352052 | |
Formaldehyde | Polyscience | 4018 |