Electrophysiological characterization of neuronal responses is important for understanding brain function and for guiding the placement of dyes for pathway tracing. However, many studies are performed in anesthetized animals. To understand brain function without anesthetics, we developed a method to record neuronal response properties and inject dyes in awake mouse.
It is well known that anesthesia alters neural response properties in various regions of the brain.13. In the auditory system, fundamental response properties of brainstem neurons including threshold, frequency specificity, and inhibitory sidebands are altered in significant ways under anesthesia1-2. These observations prompted physiologists to seek ways to record from single neurons without the contaminating effects of anesthesia. One result was a decerebrate preparation, where the brainstem was completely transected at the level of the midbrain4. The drawbacks of this preparation are a formidable surgery, the elimination of descending projections from the forebrain, and an inability to use sensory stimulation to examine structures above the midbrain. A different strategy has been to implant electrode arrays chronically to record from single neurons and multiunit clusters while the animal is awake and/or behaving5,6. These techniques however are not compatible with injecting tracer dyes after first electrophysiologically characterizing a brain structure. To avoid altering neural response properties with anesthetics while recording electrophysiological response properties from single neurons, we have adapted a head restraint technique long used in bats7-9 to mouse10-12. Using this method, we are able to conduct electrophysiological recordings over several days in the unanesthetized mouse. At the end of the recording sessions, we can then inject a dye to reconstruct electrode positions and recording sites or inject a tracer so that pathways to and from the recording loci can be determined. This method allows for well isolated single neuron recordings over multiple days without the use anesthetics.
1. Head-restraint Overview
2. Stereotaxic Alignment for Craniotomy
Note: All procedures outlined below follow standard aseptic surgical techniques and have been approved by the Washington State University Animal Care and Use Committee and the Animal Ethics Committee of the Garvan Institute.
3. Head-post and Ground Pin Installation
4. Craniotomy
5. Post-surgery
6. Recording and Dye Injection
7. Representative Results
Successful installation of the head-post allows the experimenter to record single and multiunit responses from an unanesthetized, awake mouse over multiple days. The restraint system allows for stable electrophysiological recordings of single neurons in the brain. Excellent isolation of single units and strong responses to stimuli can be recorded from the same brain structure over multiple days, for example in the mouse inferior colliculus (Fig. 9A, day one; Figure 9B, day two). With a good head-post installation, each mouse will be consistently aligned to the stereotaxic apparatus and the mouse stereotaxic atlas,13 resulting in reliable localization of particular brain nuclei. This reliable localization allows for injection of dyes and tracers into specific structures after multiple recording days. For example, to assess descending projections from the auditory midbrain to the auditory brainstem, biotinylated dextran amine (visualized using diaminobenzidine as chromagen) can be injected into the mouse inferior colliculus (Fig. 10A) after electrophysiologically identifying neuronal response properties at the site of injection (in Fig. 10A, a neuron was recorded with a best frequency of 51 kHz), and after tissue processing, anterograde labeling in the contralateral dorsal cochlear nucleus can been visualized and plotted (Fig. 10B). Photomicrographs at higher resolution can also be obtained to view anterogradely labeled axons and terminals (Fig. 10C).
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
The advantage of the head-post restraint system for electrophysiological and neuroanatomical experiments in mouse is that experiments can be conducted with unanesthetized, awake mice, eliminating potential response contamination due to anesthetic drugs. In addition, the set up can be used over multiple days to allow for more efficient animal use.
Most components for the head-post are available off-the-shelf. Only the head-post and mounting apparatus are custom-made, both of which are relatively straightforward to construct and are reusable. If a machine shop is not available at an Institution, the researcher can likely use http://www.emachineshop.com/ to fabricate the necessary components.
Proficient surgical skills are necessary. Surgeons must be proficient with fine surgical techniques, some of which are best done underneath a microscope. The surgery must be done under aseptic conditions. Removing the skull flap is the most delicate point of the procedure. By carefully and gently making multiple scores with a scalpel along the 4 sides of the rectangle while looking through an operating microscope, the skull flap can be “popped off” with minimal bleeding, leaving the dura mater intact. Familiarity with the underlying vasculature is essential, as making a cut above a major blood vessel creates a risk of undesirable bleeding. Because our research focuses on the auditory system, we have avoided the use of drills for performing craniotomies in order to minimize the potential for bone-conducted inner ear trauma.
It is important to get the anterior-posterior plane level and in stereotaxic alignment prior to attaching the head-post. This precaution ensures that the head will remain level across experimental trials and facilitates the location of brain loci using a brain atlas.
For recording, it is useful to handle the mouse on a daily basis for a few days prior to surgery. Just getting the mouse exposed to handling and restraint in the foam device facilitates longer recording sessions with much reduced stress and movement of the mouse. The key is to have the mouse fit snugly in the foam sandwich. If the animal can move excessively, it tends to struggle continuously. If the mouse starts to struggle, it is best to terminate the recording session and pick up again the next day. Movement of the mouse results in large biopotentials in the recordings that are not evoked by the stimuli. These are generally greater amplitude that action potentials and are intermittent. Movement artifacts can also be generated by the recording wires touching the animal. It is important to ensure that there are no wires touching the animal. Overall, this technique has allowed us to conduct multiple studies on auditory processing and anatomy without the use of anesthetics.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Supported by NSF grant 0920060, NIH grant DC004395, NHMRC grant 1009482, NSW Office of Science and Medical Research, and the Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation.
Name | Company | Catalogue number | Comments |
Etch gel for cleaning skull prior to dental cement | Henry Schein | 101-5396 | 12/pk with 1.2 mL syringes |
Primer for dental cement | Kerr Optibond | 25881 | 8 mL bottle |
Adhesive for dental cement | Kerr Optibond | 25882 | 8 mL bottle |
Applicators for dental cement | Kerr Optibond | 24680 | 200/pk |
Dental Cement | Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer | 66000085 | 4gm Syringe Refill |
Tungsten Rod (Ground Pin) | A-M Systems | 717200 | 0.010″ diameter |
Economy UV Curing Light | Henry Schein | CU-80 | |
Head-post | Built in-house | ||
Mounting bar | Built in-house | ||
Mounting block | Built in-house | ||
Stereotaxic Frame | David Kopf Instruments | 902 | |
Mouse and Neonatal Rat Adaptor | Stoelting | 51625 | |
Deltaphase Isothermal Pad | Braintree Scientific, Inc. | 39DP |