Recent advances in 2-photon microscopy have enabled real-time in situ imaging of live tissues in animal models, thereby enhancing our ability to investigate cellular behavior in both physiologic and pathologic conditions. Here, we outline the preparations required to perform intravital imaging of the mouse popliteal lymph node.
Lymph nodes (LNs) are secondary lymphoid organs, which are strategically located throughout the body to allow for trapping and presentation of foreign antigens from peripheral tissues to prime the adaptive immune response. Juxtaposed between innate and adaptive immune responses, the LN is an ideal site to study immune cell interactions1,2. Lymphocytes (T cells, B cells and NK cells), dendritic cells (DCs), and macrophages comprise the bulk of bone marrow-derived cellular elements of the LN. These cells are strategically positioned in the LN to allow efficient surveillance of self antigens and potential foreign antigens3-5. The process by which lymphocytes successfully encounter cognate antigens is a subject of intense investigation in recent years, and involves an integration of molecular contacts including antigen receptors, adhesion molecules, chemokines, and stromal structures such as the fibro-reticular network2,6-12.
Prior to the development of high-resolution real-time fluorescent in vivo imaging, investigators relied on static imaging, which only offers answers regarding morphology, position, and architecture. While these questions are fundamental in our understanding of immune cell behavior, the limitations intrinsic with this technique does not permit analysis to decipher lymphocyte trafficking and environmental clues that affect dynamic cell behavior. Recently, the development of intravital two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2P-LSM) has allowed investigators to view the dynamic movements and interactions of individual cells within live LNs in situ12-16. In particular, we and others have applied this technique to image cellular behavior and interactions within the popliteal LN, where its compact, dense nature offers the advantage of multiplex data acquisition over a large tissue area with diverse tissue sub-structures11,17-18. It is important to note that this technique offers added benefits over explanted tissue imaging techniques, which require disruption of blood, lymph flow, and ultimately the cellular dynamics of the system. Additionally, explanted tissues have a very limited window of time in which the tissue remains viable for imaging after explant. With proper hydration and monitoring of the animal’s environmental conditions, the imaging time can be significantly extended with this intravital technique. Here, we present a detailed method of preparing mouse popliteal LN for the purpose of performing intravital imaging.
1. Mouse Holder Assembly
2. Mouse Preparation
Note: With sufficient practice, one should be able to perform the mouse preparation and surgical steps in 20-30 minutes.
3. Surgery
4. 2-Photon Imaging Acquisition**
** This surgical procedure may also be useful for other forms of intravital imaging other than 2P-LSM.
5. Representative Results
Various circulating immune cells are recruited to the LN at different rates following adoptive transfer. For CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, these cells begin to arrive in the LN through the high endothelial venule (HEV) minutes after i.v. transfer with substantial numbers arriving in the popliteal LN after 2 to 4 hours6,17-18. For B cells, a substantial number will accumulate after 8 to 24 hours19. Activated DCs should start to appear in the draining popliteal LN 8 to 16 hours following footpad injection3,11,16-17. Figure 2a shows that even without other landmarks, structures such as B cell follicles can be discerned easily by the round spherical cell accumulation visible under 2P-LSM19. Using an endogenous fluorescent reporter such as the ubiquitin-GFP splenocytes (Figure 2, Supplemental Videos 1 and 2), one can track these lymphocyte migrations and behaviors for days up to a week under non-stimulatory physiologic conditions. With multi-channel high sensitivity detectors, it is possible to acquire a multiplex imaging dataset that encompasses structural information as well as interaction dynamics among multiple cellular partners17,19.
When the surgical techniques are properly executed and the environmental conditions carefully monitored, lymphocytes should exhibit characteristic migration speed, as demonstrated in Figure 2c, 2d and elsewhere13-14,16. Lymphocytes may also exhibit differences in migration speed depending on the sub-regions of the LN undergoing imaging, so additional landmarks such as blood vessels (as highlighted by the introduction of vessel dyes) will help to determine the overall imaging quality (i.e. proper temperature control, minimal trauma to LN, etc.)3,6,20.
Figure 1. Construction of a mouse holder for mouse popliteal LN Imaging. a) Schematics of mouse holder assembly; b) Representative intravital mouse preparation; c) Completed mouse holder assembly; d) Close-up views of the popliteal LN after surgical exposure.
Figure 2. Migration analysis of GFP+ lymphocytes in the popliteal LN. (a) 3D snapshot taken from 2P-LSM imaging sequence of the popliteal LN in a C57BL/6 recipient mouse adoptively transferred with 1×107 GFP+ lymphocytes 1 day prior to imaging. Dash line denotes the border of B cell follicles; (b) Tracks of lymphocyte migration during 1 hour of continuous imaging; c) Distribution of overall lymphocyte migration speed. Mean speed = 10.04 ± 4.26 μm/min (total of 15,125 tracks analyzed); d) Differential cellular migration speed distribution of cells found in the B cell follicle (open bars; mean speed = 8.79 ± 3.90 μm/min; total 1,525 tracks analyzed) and T cell zone (closed bars; mean speed = 13.77 ± 5.93 μm/min; total of 1,250 tracks analyzed). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Supplemental Video 1. Time-lapse intravital 2P-LSM imaging of a mouse popliteal LN as described in Figure 2. A total of 1×107 lymphocytes were isolated from an ubiquitin-GFP+ donor mouse and adoptively transferred intravenously into a C57BL/6 recipient mouse 24 hours before imaging. A series of xy (750 μm x 750 μm) fluorescence images were taken through fixed z stacks (5 μm steps, 13 steps) to yield an xyz imaging stack (750 μm x 750 μm x 65 μm), which was repeated every 20 seconds for a total of 60 minutes, resulting in an xyzt imaging sequence for speed analysis (Figures 2c, 2d). Playback speed = 450x. Scale bar = 50 μm. Time stamp = min:sec. Click here to watch supplemental video.
Supplemental Video 2. Zoomed-in view of the imaging sequence in Supplemental Video 1 at the B cell follicle – T cell zone border. Playback speed = 450x. Scale bar = 25 μm. Time stamp = min: sec. Click here to watch supplemental video.
Recent advances in high-resolution in situ imaging techniques, especially 2P-LSM, have been accompanied by a growing interest in the study of dynamic cellular behavior in vivo. The 4D imaging technique on the popliteal LN of a live mouse allows such analyses in the dynamic behavior of immune cells within the undisrupted tissue micro-environment. The use of 2P-LSM with multiple detectors spanning the entire visible spectrum permits simultaneous imaging data collection of multiple cell populations. This can now be achieved through the use of in vivo cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice (e.g. Ubiquitin-eGFP, -RFP, or -eCFP) combined with the use of adoptive transfer of differentially labeled cell populations using organic fluorescent cell dyes (e.g. CFSE, SNARF-1, and Cell Tracker Orange) to examine cellular mechanisms and function within the LN. In addition to the direct observation of interactions between differentially tracked cell populations, the multiplex imaging dataset can undergo further analysis with commercially available imaging processing software programs (e.g. Imaris, BitPlane Inc.) to further elucidate cell behavior and function. A broad array of possibilities exists to study cellular interaction mechanisms using these in vivo and in silico techniques.
The main limitation of the experimental approach described here is the technical complexity inherent in the surgery approach. This technique requires rigorous training to become familiar with the relevant anatomy and the precise technical procedures and skills as required by this protocol. Further complicating factors include the difficulty in minimizing tissue damage during LN exploration, optimizing tissue stability during imaging, and preventing thermal and laser injury to the LN before and during imaging experimentation. Perturbation to any of these factors will result in less-than-optimal lymphocyte motility and will therefore interfere with proper interpretation of resulting imaging data analyses.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work is supported by grants from NCI 1R01CA154656 , NIAID 1R21AI092299, Cancer Research Institute, St. Baldrick’s Foundation, Dana Foundation, Gabrielle’s Angel Foundation, and Hyundai Motors of America “Hope-on-Wheels” Program.
Reagent | Company | Catalogue Number |
Isoflurane, USP | Baxter Healthcare Corporation | NDC 10019-773-60 |
Vetbond | 3M | 1469SB |
Nair – hair removal lotion | Nair | |
PBS, 1X | Cellgro | 21-040-CV |
Heating pad | Watlow | |
Heating Pad Controller | Watlow | |
Air and O2 | Airgas | |
Temperature probe | Harvard Apparatus | |
Tweezers Dumont #5 | World Precision Instruments, Inc | 14101 |
Forceps, Graefe Iris, 7 cm curved | World Precision Instruments, Inc | 14141 |
Scissors | Roboz Surgical Instrument Co., Inc | RS-5880 |
Cover of 100×20 mm glass cell culture dish | Corning | 70165-102 |
Cover of 100×20 mm polystyrene cell culture dish | Corning | 430167 |
Betadine Solution (10% Povidine-Iodine Topical Solution) | Purdue Products, L.P. | NDC 67618-150-08 |