We present protocols for the 3-dimensional (3D) encapsulation of cells within synthetic hydrogels. The encapsulation procedure is outlined for two commonly used methods of crosslinking (michael-type addition and light-initiated free radical mechanisms), as well as a number of techniques for assessing encapsulated cell behavior.
The 3D encapsulation of cells within hydrogels represents an increasingly important and popular technique for culturing cells and towards the development of constructs for tissue engineering. This environment better mimics what cells observe in vivo, compared to standard tissue culture, due to the tissue-like properties and 3D environment. Synthetic polymeric hydrogels are water-swollen networks that can be designed to be stable or to degrade through hydrolysis or proteolysis as new tissue is deposited by encapsulated cells. A wide variety of polymers have been explored for these applications, such as poly(ethylene glycol) and hyaluronic acid. Most commonly, the polymer is functionalized with reactive groups such as methacrylates or acrylates capable of undergoing crosslinking through various mechanisms. In the past decade, much progress has been made in engineering these microenvironments – e.g., via the physical or pendant covalent incorporation of biochemical cues – to improve viability and direct cellular phenotype, including the differentiation of encapsulated stem cells (Burdick et al.).
The following methods for the 3D encapsulation of cells have been optimized in our and other laboratories to maximize cytocompatibility and minimize the number of hydrogel processing steps. In the following protocols (see Figure 1 for an illustration of the procedure), it is assumed that functionalized polymers capable of undergoing crosslinking are already in hand; excellent reviews of polymer chemistry as applied to the field of tissue engineering may be found elsewhere (Burdick et al.) and these methods are compatible with a range of polymer types. Further, the Michael-type addition (see Lutolf et al.) and light-initiated free radical (see Elisseeff et al.) mechanisms focused on here constitute only a small portion of the reported crosslinking techniques. Mixed mode crosslinking, in which a portion of reactive groups is first consumed by addition crosslinking and followed by a radical mechanism, is another commonly used and powerful paradigm for directing the phenotype of encapsulated cells (Khetan et al., Salinas et al.).
A. Material Preparation and Sterilization
B. Cell Preparation
C. Hydrogel Formation
D. Cell Culture and Analysis
Representative Results:
See Figures 2-4 (as referenced in the above protocols) for representative results of visualization of photopatterned hydrogels and encapsulation of cells within gels.
Figure 1. Overview of 3D encapsulation procedure. Diagram steps correspond to section titles in the stepwise protocols.
Figure 2. Photopatterned hydrogel using sequential Michael-type addition then radical polymerization. (A) Schematic of photopatterning of a partially crosslinked hydrogel with incorporation of a photo reactive dye. (B) Circle or (C) stripe transparency film mask patterned hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Methacrylated rhodamine (MeRho) is incorporated only in regions of the gel that were exposed to light. Scale bars = 100 μm.
Figure 3. Visualization of cells in 3D hydrogels. Stem cells visualized via (a) light microscopy or (b) live (green, Calcein AM) and dead (red, Ethidium homodimer-1) staining 24 hours following encapsulation at 1 million cells/mL in a hyaluronic acid hydrogel crosslinked through a light initiated free radical mechanism. Scale bars = 100 μm.
Figure 4. Visualization of cells in 3D hydrogels. hMSCs stained for (a) live cells (Calcein AM) or (b) cellular actin (rhodamine phalloidin) and nuclei (DAPI) five days following encapsulation at 1 million cells/mL in a hyaluronic acid hydrogel crosslinked through a Michael-type mechanism (using pendant adhesive peptides and bifunctional proteolytically degradable peptide crosslinkers). Scale bars = 100 μm.
The described protocols represent a simple and powerful method to encapsulate cells within hydrogel scaffolds in a cytocompatible manner. Such techniques are especially important since terminally differentiated and stem cells can exhibit markedly different behavior in 2D versus 3D microenvironments. Even for therapeutic approaches involving the implantation of materials (e.g., in situ radical polymerization), cell encapsulation and analysis for viability and differentiation can help in the material development process. The described sequential process can be used to spatially manipulate the hydrogel environment, and consequently cellular behavior (see Khetan et al.).
Overall, the most critical element of the described protocols is the homogeneity of all solutions used. In particular, special care should be taken to ensure cells are evenly distributed in the prepolymer solution, and that the solution is well mixed by pipette resuspension following addition of the crosslinker solution. Failing to ensure this can lead to clumping of cells or local variations in gel structure and swelling.
While the protocols presented here focus primarily on the procedure for encapsulating cells, it is important to note also that encapsulation may necessitate some adjustment to analysis protocols that are typically written for 2D seeding. Several examples were illustrated for visualizing and assessing cells in hydrogels.
This work was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to SK and National Institutes of Heath grant R01EB008722.
Material Name | Type | Company | Catalogue Number | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
I2959 | Reagent | Ciba Specialty Chemicals | ||
.2 M Triethanolamine Buffer | Reagent | Sigma | T0449 | |
PBS | Reagent | Invitrogen | 14040-117 | 1x, sterile liquid |
Live/Dead staining kit | Reagent | Invitrogen | L3224 | Includes live (Calcein AM) and dead (ethidium homodimer-1) probes |
Phalloidin-FITC | Reagent | Sigma | P5282 | |
Rhodamine Phalloidin | Reagent | Invitrogen | R415 | |
DAPI | Reagent | Sigma | D9542 | |
Methacryloxyethyl thiocarbamoyl rhodamine B (MeRho) | Reagent | Polysciences | 23591 | |
Bovine Serum Albumin | Reagent | Sigma | A7030 | |
Tween 20 | Reagent | Sigma | P1379 | |
Triton X-100 | Reagent | Sigma | T8787 | |
Citrisolv | Reagent | Fisher | 22-143975 | |
Micro-cut paraffin | Reagent | Polysciences, Inc. | 24202 | |
Trizol reagent | Reagent | Invitrogen | 15596-026 | |
0.22 μm pore size nylon syringe filters | Equipment | Fisher Scientific | 09-719C | |
1 mL disposable syringes | Equipment | BD biosciences | 309602 | Cut syringes at consistent height for UV exposure |
Wide orifice pipette tips | Equipment | Sigma | P6800 | |
Omnicure UV Spot Cure System with 365 nm filter | Equipment | Exfo Life Sciences Division | S1000 | |
254 nm germicidal UV light source | Equipment | Built into most biological safety cabinets |