The present protocol prepares and evaluates the physical properties, immune response, and in vivo protective effect of a novel nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine.
Nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccines have attracted extensive attention because of their small particle size, high thermal stability, and ability to induce validly immune responses. However, establishing a series of comprehensive protocols to evaluate the immune response of a novel nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine is vital. Therefore, this article features a rigorous procedure to determine the physicochemical characteristics of a vaccine (by transmission electron microscopy [TEM], atomic force microscopy [AFM], and dynamic light scattering [DLS]), the stability of the vaccine antigen and system (by a high-speed centrifuge test, a thermodynamic stability test, SDS-PAGE, and western blot), and the specific immune response (IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b). Using this approach, researchers can evaluate accurately the protective effect of a novel nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine in a lethal MRSA252 mouse model. With these protocols, the most promising nanoemulsion vaccine adjuvant in terms of effective adjuvant potential can be identified. In addition, the methods can help optimize novel vaccines for future development.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an opportunistic pathogen with one of the highest infection rates in an intensive care unit (ICU) wards1, cardiology departments, and burn departments worldwide. MRSA exhibits high rates of infection, mortality, and broad drug resistance, presenting great difficulties in clinical treatment2. In the Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria released by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2017, MRSA was listed in the most critical category3. A vaccine against MRSA infection is therefore urgently needed.
Aluminum adjuvant has been used for a long time, and the adjuvant auxiliary mechanism is relatively clear, safe, effective, and well tolerated4. Aluminum adjuvants are currently a widely used type of adjuvant. It is generally believed that antigens adsorbed on aluminum salt particles can improve the stability and enhance the ability of the injection site to uptake antigens, providing good absorption and slow release5. Currently, the main disadvantage of aluminum adjuvants is that they lack an adjuvant effect or exhibit only a weak adjuvant effect on some vaccine candidate antigens6. In addition, aluminum adjuvants induce IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions5. Therefore, it is necessary to develop novel adjuvants to stimulate a stronger immune response.
Nanoemulsion adjuvants are colloidal dispersion systems composed of oil, water, surfactants, and cosurfactants7. In addition, the adjuvants are thermodynamically stable and isotropic, can be autoclaved or stabilized by high-speed centrifugation, and can be formed spontaneously under mild preparation conditions. Several emulsion adjuvants (such as MF59, NB001-002 series, AS01-04 series, etc.) are currently on the market or in the clinical research stage, but their particle sizes are greater than 160 nm8. Therefore, the advantages of nanoscale (1-100 nm) medicinal preparations (i.e., large specific surface area, small particle size, surface effect, high surface energy, small size effect, and macro quantum tunneling effect) cannot be fully exploited. In the present protocol, a novel adjuvant based on nanoemulsion technology with a diameter size of 1-100 nm has been reported to exhibit good adjuvant activity9. We tested the recombination subunit vaccine antigen protein HI (α-hemolysin mutant [Hla] and Fe ion surface determining factor B [IsdB] subunit N2 active fragment fusion protein); a series of procedures were established to examine the physical properties and stability, evaluate its specific antibody response after intramuscular administration, and test the protective effect of the vaccine using a mouse systemic infection model.
The animal experiments were conducted based on the manual on the use and care of experimental animals and were approved by the Laboratory Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the Third Military Medical University. Female Balb/c mice, 6-8 weeks old, were used for the present study. The animals were obtained from commercial sources (see Table of Materials).
1. Preparation of the MRSA HI antigen protein
2. Preparation of the nanoemulsion vaccine
3. Physical characterization and stability of the nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine
4. Assessment of antibody immune response to this vaccine after intramuscular administration
NOTE: The mice were immunized by intramuscular injection of the nanoemulsion vaccine following a published report11. The mice were administered PBS as a negative control. At 1 week after three immunizations were completed, serum was collected from the mice11. The serum levels of IgG and subclasses of IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b were quantitatively determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
5. Evaluation of the in vivo effects of the novel adjuvant vaccines
NOTE: The protective effect of this nanoemulsion vaccine was evaluated in a commercially obtained lethal MRSA252 mouse model (see Table of Materials). According to the previous results of our research group14, 1 x 108 colony forming units (CFU)/mouse is the best dose to evaluate the protective effect of the lethal model of MRSA252 bacterial infection.
The protocol for preparing the nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine and in vitro and in vivo tests of this vaccine was evaluated. TEM, AFM, and DLS were used to determine the important characteristics of the zeta potential and particle size on the surface of this sample (Figure 1). SDS-PAGE and western blotting showed that the amount of antigen in the precipitate and supernatant did not significantly degrade after centrifugation, which indicated that the vaccine was structurally intact, specific, and immunogenic (Figure 2). The nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine significantly increased the total IgG, IgG1, and IgG 2a antibody titers. The immunogenicity of the vaccine was significantly improved (Figure 3A–C). The serum IgG2b OD values at 450 nm of the antigen group were the highest (dilute at 1:500 PBS) (Figure 3D). The lethal MRSA252 mouse model most directly reflected that the nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine showed a good protective effect and effectively inhibited bacterial infection with MRSA252, improving the survival rate of infected mice (Figure 4).
Figure 1: Physical characteristics of the novel nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine. (A) Transmission electron micrograph. (B) Atomic force microscopy micrograph. (C) Size diameter and distribution. (D) Zeta potential and distribution. The figure is reproduced from Sun, H. W. et al. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 10, 7275-7290 (2015)11. Originally published by and used with permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Physical stability of the novel nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine. (A) Structural integrity of the antigenic proteins. (B) Structural specificity of the antigen protein. Lane 3: blank nanoemulsion-treated supernatant; Lane 4: blank nanoemulsion treatment precipitate; Lane 5: prestained marker; Lane 6: vaccine supernatant; Lane 7: vaccine precipitate; Lane 8: vaccine treatment supernatant; Lane 9: vaccine treatment precipitate; Lane 10: native protein agent; (A) and (B) mixed term. Clearly defined protein channels are marked by black squares. Black arrows indicate antigenic proteins. The figure is reproduced from Sun, H. W. et al. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 10, 7275-7290 (2015)11. Originally published by and used with permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd.Sun et al. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: IgG and its subgroup antibody levels after intramuscular injection with the nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine. (A) Log2 value of the IgG titers. (B) 450 nm optical density of serum IgG1. (C) 450 nm optical density of serum IgG2a. (D) 450 nm optical density of serum IgG2b. The figure is reproduced from Sun, H. W. et al. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 10, 7275-7290 (2015)11. Originally published by and used with permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Protective effect in the lethal model of MRSA252 bacterial infection. The survival ratio of mice in response to systemic MRSA infection. The figure is reproduced from Sun, H. W. et al. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 10, 7275-7290 (2015)11. Originally published by and used with permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: ELISA spiking sequence and dilution template. Please click here to download this Table.
IsdB, a bacterial cell wall-anchored and iron-regulated surface protein, plays an important role in the process of obtaining heme iron15. Hla, alpha toxin, is among the most effective bacterial toxins known in MRSA, and can form pores in eukaryotic cells and interfere with adhesion and epithelial cells16. In our study, a novel recombination MRSA antigen protein (HI) was constructed and expressed with gene engineering technology based on the antigen genes of IsdB and Hla. Then, a nanoemulsion vaccine was developed by the low-energy emulsification method, and the stability and effectiveness of this vaccine were evaluated. For example, some characteristics, such as long-term stability, structure, shape, absorption, and effect in vivo, are greatly affected by the size of the emulsion droplet7. The results showed that particle size was an important factor affecting the transport of nanoemulsions in vivo and their phagocytosis by antigen-presenting cells17. Regarding cytophagocytosis, nanoparticles smaller than 1 µm are more easily phagocytosed by dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages and are the most likely to stimulate systemic immunity18.
Regarding particle transport, nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm are more likely to be transmitted through lymphatic vessels to enhance the immune effect; however, small nanoparticles infiltrate into blood vessels, while large nanoparticles slow their transport speed in lymphatic vessels19. Thus, the optimal particle size is in the range of 20-50 nm. Hence, it is critical to study the physical characteristics of nanoparticles, including shape, size, and zeta potential. TEM, with its high precision, has become an important and basic tool for understanding the properties of nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccines. Additionally, the technology has been widely applied in many fields for several years. Another nanomechanical characterization tool with 3D and nanoscale high-resolution information, AFM, was also used to evaluate the nanoemulsion vaccine13. Importantly, DLS, which simultaneously reveals both size and charge20, can provide key information, such as the aggregation state of nanoemulsion vaccine particles in solution. According to the literature, a high zeta potential value is indispensable for the physical and chemical stability of colloidal suspensions, as a large repulsive force often prevents aggregation caused by occasional collisions with adjacent nanoparticles. Therefore, in our research, we set up these schemes and evaluated their physical and chemical properties with TEM, AFM, and DLS.
Protein vaccines play an important role in the prevention and treatment of major infectious diseases21. Protein vaccines have developed rapidly in recent years, but serious challenges remain in immune efficacy and persistence. The fundamental reasons for this are poor protein stability, small distribution coefficient, short biological half-life of antigens, and high clearance rates in vivo22. In this protocol, the stability of the novel nanoemulsion vaccine was evaluated, and no antigen degradation was observed by SDS-PAGE or western blot.
A safe, effective, and marketable protein vaccine must be supplemented with an appropriate immune adjuvant to significantly enhance the immunogenicity of the protein antigen and the type of protective immune response20 to obtain the optimal vaccine immune protection. The antibody level stimulated by a protein vaccine is among the important indicators for the effective prevention and treatment of infection, and the antibody titer is an important index to evaluate whether the novel nanoemulsion adjuvant can improve the immunogenicity of the naked antigen. Novel immune adjuvants can significantly stimulate the body to enhance the humoral and cellular immune response levels, and enriching the types of immune response and immune protective efficacy of vaccines is an important development direction and the component of future research and the development of novel vaccines23. Therefore, in this protocol, antibody titers of mouse serum-specific IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b with the novel nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine were detected. The lethal mouse model24 is the gold standard for evaluating vaccines, and in our protocol, a lethal MRSA252 mouse model was used to evaluate the protective effect. The results showed that the novel nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine effectively improved the survival rate of Balb/c mice infected with MRSA.
This protocol is not sufficient in the stability evaluation of nanoemulsion vaccines. Circular dichroism is a suitable method if it can be applied to detect the spatial structure of vaccine proteins in a simple and fast method. Although the survival rate of mice tested by the attack is the gold standard for evaluating the in vivo test and effectiveness of the vaccine, it would be more convincing if the amount of bacterial colonization of the organs of mice after attack could be measured. Therefore, there are still some shortcomings in the present protocol to evaluate the immune response of the nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccine, and the above experiment needs to be supplemented in subsequent relevant experiments for evaluation.
In conclusion, it is necessary to establish a series of evaluations of physical properties, stability, specific immune response, and challenge protection. Completing these schemes will provide vital experimental fundamentals for the application and development of novel nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccines.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This research was supported by No. 2021YFC2302603 of the National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 32070924 and 32000651 of the NSFC, and No. 2019jcyjA-msxmx0159 of the Natural Science Foundation Project Program of Chongqing.
5424-Small high speed centrifugeFA-45-24-11 | Eppendorf, Germany | 5424000495 | |
96-well plates | Corning Incorporated, USA | CLS3922 | |
AFM Dimension FastScan | BRUKER, Germany | null | |
Alcohol lamp | Shenzhen Yibaxun Technology Co.,China | YBS-AA-11408 | |
Balb/c mice | Beijing HFK Bioscience Co. Ltd. | ||
BCIP/NBT | Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Development Company,China | BCIP/NBT | |
Bio-Rad 6.0 microplate reader | Bio-Rad Laboratories Incorporated Limited Co., CA, USA | null | |
BL21 Competent Cell | Merck millipore,Germany | 70232-3CN | |
BSA-100G | Sigma-Aldrich, USA | B2064-100G | |
Centrifuge 5810 R | Eppendorf, Germany | 5811000398 | |
Coomassie bright blue G-250 staining solution | MIKX,China | DB236 | |
Decolorization solution | BOSTER,China | AR0163-2 | |
Electro-heating standing-temperature cultivator HH-B11-420 | Shanghai Yuejin Medical Device Factory, China | null | |
Electrophoresis apparatus | Beijing Liuyi Instrument Factory, China | DYCZ-25D | |
Gel image | Tanon, USA | null | |
Glutathione-Sepharose Resin GST | Mei5bio,China | affinity chromatography resin | |
H2SO4 | Chengdu KESHI Chemical Co., LTD,China | 7664-93-9 | |
HI recombinant protein | Third Military Medical University,China | 110-27-0 | |
HRP -Goat Anti-Mouse IgG | Biodragon, China | BF03001 | |
HRP- Goat anti-mouse IgG1 | Biodragon, China | BF03002R | |
HRP- Goat anti-mouse IgG2a | Biodragon, China | BF03003R | |
HRP- Goat anti-mouse IgG2b | Biodragon, China | BF03004R | |
Inoculation loop | Haimen Feiyue Co.,LTD,China | YR-JZH-1UL | |
IsdB and Hla clones | Shanghai Jereh Biotechnology Co,China | null | |
Isopropyl nutmeg (pharmaceutic adjuvant) | SEPPIC, France | null | |
isopropyl- β-D-1-mercaptogalactopyranoside | fdbio,China | FD3278-1 | |
LB bouillon culture-medium | Beijing AOBOX Biotechnology Co., LTD,China | 02-136 | |
Lnfrared physiotherapy lamp | Guangzhou Runman Medical Equipment Co.,China | 7600 | |
Low temperature refrigerated centrifuge | Eppendorf, Germany | null | |
Malvern NANO ZS | Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK | null | |
MH(A) medium | Beijing AOBOX Biotechnology Co., LTD,China | 02-051 | |
MH(B) medium | Beijing AOBOX Biotechnology Co., LTD,China | 02-052 | |
Micro plate washing machine 405 LSRS | Bio Tek Instruments,Inc Highland Park,USA | null | |
Mini-TBC Compact Film Transfer Instrument | BeiJingDongFangRuiLi Co.,LTD,China | 1658030 | |
MMC packing | TOSOH(SHANGHAI)CO.,LTD | 0022818 | |
MRSA252 | USA, ATCC | null | |
Nanodrop ultraviolet spectrophotometer | Thermo Scientific, USA | null | |
New FlashTM Protein any KD PAGE Protein electrophoresis gel kit | DAKEWE, China | 8012011 | |
PBS | biosharp, China | null | |
PCR, Amplifier | Thermal Cycler, USA | null | |
pGEX-target gene recombinant plasmid | Shanghai Jereh Biotechnology Co,China | B3528G | |
Phosphotungstic acid | G-CLONE, China | CS1231-25g | |
pipette | Eppendorf, Germany | 3120000844 | |
polyoxyethylated castor oil (pharmaceutic adjuvant) | Aladdin, China | K400327-1kg | |
Primary antibody | Laboratory homemade:from immunized mice with positive sera | null | See Reference 11 for details |
propylene glycol (pharmaceutic adjuvant) | Sigma-Aldrich, USA | P4347-500ML | |
Protein Marker | Thermo Scientufuc, USA | 26616 | |
PVDF TRANSFER MEMBRANE | Invitrogen,USA | 88518 | |
Scanning Electron Microscope | JEOL,Japan | JSM-IT800 | |
Sodium pentobarbital | Merck,Germany | Tc-P8411 | |
Talos L120C TEM | Thermo Fisher, USA | null | |
TMB color solution | TIAN GEN, China | PA107-01 | |
Turtle kits | Xiamen Bioendo Technology Co.,LTD | ES80545 | |
Tween-20 | Macklin, China | 9005-64-5 |