Bacterial cells are spatially highly organized. To follow this organization over time in slow growing Myxococcus xanthus cells, a set-up for fluorescence live-cell imaging with high spatiotemporal resolution over several generations was developed. Using this method, spatiotemporal dynamics of important proteins for chromosome segregation and cell division could be determined.
Fluorescence live-cell imaging of bacterial cells is a key method in the analysis of the spatial and temporal dynamics of proteins and chromosomes underlying central cell cycle events. However, imaging of these molecules in slow-growing bacteria represents a challenge due to photobleaching of fluorophores and phototoxicity during image acquisition. Here, we describe a simple protocol to circumvent these limitations in the case of Myxococcus xanthus (which has a generation time of 4 – 6 h). To this end, M. xanthus cells are grown on a thick nutrient-containing agar pad in a temperature-controlled humid environment. Under these conditions, we determine the doubling time of individual cells by following the growth of single cells. Moreover, key cellular processes such as chromosome segregation and cell division can be imaged by fluorescence live-cell imaging of cells containing relevant fluorescently labeled marker proteins such as ParB-YFP, FtsZ-GFP, and mCherry-PomX over multiple cell cycles. Subsequently, the acquired images are processed to generate montages and/or movies.
Bacterial cells are spatially highly organized with many proteins localizing asymmetrically within cellular compartments1,2,3,4. This localization is often highly dynamic and changes over time in response to cell cycle cues or external signals. Equally, the bacterial chromosome is spatially highly organized with individual loci being positioned to specific subcellular locations before and during the segregation process5. This dynamic spatial organization is important for growth, division, cell cycle regulation, differentiation, motility, signal transduction as well as chromosome organization and segregation; thus, it affects essentially all aspects of bacterial function.
The spatiotemporal dynamics of these cellular processes are being analyzed in a variety of different bacterial species with Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Vibrio cholerae, and Caulobacter crescentus serving as important model organisms. However, these four species cover only a small spectrum of the enormous bacterial diversity and, perhaps unsurprisingly given the large phylogenetic distance between these species, cellular organization and polarization mechanisms are different in these bacteria. This raises the need for studying additional bacterial species to be able to eventually extract general principles underlying the spatiotemporal dynamics of bacterial cells.
The Gram-negative delta-proteobacterium M. xanthus is a model organism in the study of social behaviors and cooperation in bacteria6. M. xanthus is a strict aerobe and in the presence of nutrients, it forms colonies in which cells spread outwards in a highly coordinated, swarming fashion and preys on other microorganisms7. In response to nutrient starvation, cells initiate a developmental program that results in the formation of fruiting bodies that consists of thousands of cells, and inside which, the rod-shaped motile cells differentiate to spherical diploid spores8. Both types of behaviors, i.e., swarming and fruiting body formation, are only executed by cells that are placed on a solid surface. Moreover, under both nutrient conditions, cells engage in processes that involve direct cell-cell contacts including the exchange of outer membrane lipoproteins that may stimulate motility or function as toxins in the recipient9,10, the exchange of LPS11, stimulation of motility by exopolysaccharides on neighboring cells12, and intercellular signaling by a cell surface-anchored signaling protein13,14.
Recently, M. xanthus has also become a model organism for studying the mechanisms underlying motility and its regulation15, cell division16,17,18, and chromosome organization19,20,21. Critical steps in the M. xanthus cell cycle have been analyzed in detail by fluorescence microscopy using snap-shot images or short time-lapse recordings on strains carrying relevant fluorescently labeled proteins16,17,18,19,20. Ideally, many cells should be followed with single-cell resolution by fluorescence live cell imaging for at least one full cell cycle to obtain robust quantitative data on cell cycle parameters. However, this is a challenge in the case of M. xanthus due to its relatively long generation time of 4 – 6 h under standard laboratory conditions and due to photobleaching of fluorophores and phototoxicity during image acquisition.
Here, we describe a protocol to follow M. xanthus cells with single cell resolution by fluorescence live-cell imaging for at least 24 h and covering several cell cycles. Importantly, during the entire protocol, cells are maintained on an agar pad and in close contact allowing for the contact-dependent activities essential for the social life style of M. xanthus. The protocol also allows users to monitor shape, size, divisions, and fluorescent probes at a high temporal resolution and with single cell resolution, and thus, enables the quantification of cell-to-cell variability and correlations of cell cycle events.
1. Preparation and Growth of M. xanthus Strains
Note: See Table 1 and Table 2.
2. Preparation of Microscopy Samples
Note: Cells to be viewed by microscopy are placed on a microscope coverslip and then covered by an agarose pad containing nutrients. The coverslip is glued to a plastic or metal frame to provide mechanical support. In preparation for the microscopy, a large pad of 1% agarose/TPM/0.2% CTT should be prepared in advance as described in steps 2.1 – 2.3. Please also refer to the Table of Materials for specific products used here.
3. Microscope Set-up and Time-lapse Acquisition
Note: The protocol described here was developed for an inverted widefield microscope with autofocus, a 100X/1.30 NA oil PH3 objective, an X, Y motorized stage, a sCMOS camera, a light source, filters for green-fluorescent, red-fluorescent, or yellow-fluorescent proteins, and a temperature controlled incubation chamber. This chamber keeps cells protected from light and at constant temperature.
4. Generation of Time-lapse Movies and Image Alignment
Note: Several commercial and free software packages are available for image acquisition and image analysis. We use a commercially available software (see the Table of Materials) with multiple pre-installed plugins and additional tools.
M. xanthus is a slow growing bacterium that moves on solid surfaces. To test our experimental set-up, we performed a time-lapse experiment with motile DK1622 WT cells. Phase contrast images were acquired at intervals of 5 min for 24 h (Figure 2A, B). The majority of cells aligned in groups. As expected, cells displayed motility and predominantly moved in groups. We further observed that cells occasionally reversed direction of movement. These findings suggest that WT cells under the tested conditions behave normally in terms of cell motility. However, even when cells are recorded every 5 min, the identification of individual cells is difficult. Moreover, because cells are motile, many cells escape or enter the field of view making it difficult to follow cells for extended periods.
In order to trace the same M. xanthus cells for several rounds of the cell cycle by live-cell imaging, individual strains can be deleted for the mglA gene, which is essential for motility25. This prevents cells from moving out of the field of view during the imaging protocol. In-frame deletions are generated as described by Shi et al.26
As expected, in phase contrast live-cell imaging with non-motile ΔmglA cells (Figure 3), cells did not display active movement. We were able to follow the growth and division of individual cells during microcolony formation. Based on the time-lapse recordings in which images were acquired at intervals of 5 min for 24 h, it was possible to quantify the interdivision time (the time between two cell division events) with single cell resolution. Cells of the ΔmglA mutant had an inter-division time of 235 ± 50 min (n = 97 cells). With approximately 4 h, the interdivision time is similar to the doubling time measured in suspension cultures for WT cells. This provides evidence that M. xanthus cells grow optimally under these experimental conditions.
To investigate whether our set-up allows cells to grow normally while tracking YFP-labeled proteins over long periods, we performed fluorescence time-lapse imaging with M. xanthus cells that express a YFP-tagged protein. To this end, we followed ParB-YFP as a marker for the origin of replication (ori). ParB is as component of the ParABS system in M. xanthus and binds to the parS sites proximal to the ori; therefore, the origin duplication and chromosome segregation can be followed19,20,21. With image acquisition (phase contrast and fluorescence, 200 ms acquisition time in YFP channel) every 20 min, cells grew, divided, and displayed growth even at 24 h (Figure 4A). At the start of the recordings, ParB-YFP formed two clusters in the subpolar regions in the majority of cells (Figure 4A). Shortly before or after cell division, the subpolar ParB-YFP cluster at the old cell pole duplicated. One of the two clusters remained at the old cell pole while the second copy translocated to the new cell pole, reaching its final subpolar position after approximately 40 – 60 min (Figure 4A, B). These observations are in agreement with previous data generated from short time-lapse recordings using thin agar pads19. We conclude that this experimental set-up allows fluorescence time-lapse microscopy to track chromosome segregation over several cell cycles in slow growing M. xanthus cells, without perturbing cell growth or the chromosome segregation machinery.
In a similar experiment, we sought to follow markers for cell division by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. Similar to nearly all other bacteria, M. xanthus requires FtsZ, a bacterial tubulin-like GTPase, for cell division16,17,18. FtsZ forms a ring-like structure at midcell, the so-called Z-ring, that helps to recruit all other proteins required for cell division27,28. In M. xanthus, the formation of the Z-ring and its positioning at midcell is stimulated by the three PomXYZ proteins16,17. These three proteins form a chromosome-associated complex that transfers across the nucleoid from the site of cell division in the "mother" cell to the middle of the nucleoid in the two daughter cells. The middle of the nucleoid coincides with midcell, before chromosome segregation, and here the PomXYZ complex recruits FtsZ and stimulates Z-ring formation.
Here, we first followed non-motile cells expressing ftsZ-gfp. Because FtsZ-GFP overall shows a weaker fluorescence signal than ParB-YFP, we increased the exposure time 5-fold to 1 s in the GFP channel. As expected, strong accumulation of FtsZ-GFP was only observed at midcell and this localization dictated the position of cell division constriction (Figure 5A). FtsZ-GFP predominantly formed a cluster at midcell in longer cell. It was also evident that this cluster increased in intensity over time. After cell division, we observed that FtsZ-GFP re-accumulated at midcell in the two daughter cells approximately 2 h later (Figure 5B). This is consistent with the finding that approximately 50% of cells in a population display FtsZ localization at midcell based on snap-shot analysis16,17.
In a second experiment, we followed non-motile ΔmglA cells for 24 h that express mCherry-pomX. As part of the PomXYZ system, PomX helps to guide Z-ring formation and positioning, thereby stimulating cell division at midcell16. The fluorescence signal of mCherry-PomX is strong and allows an exposure time in the fluorescence channel of 250 ms. Importantly, all cells grew in size and displayed a cell division event over the course of the experiment, forming microcolonies after 24 h (Figure 6A). As previously reported16, almost all cells contained an mCherry-PomX cluster. The majority of these localized at midcell and clusters away from midcell translocated to midcell during the course of the experiment. During cell divisions, mCherry-PomX clusters were split, with each daughter cell receiving a cluster. As opposed to FtsZ-GFP, mCherry-PomX localized at midcell 80 – 90% of the cell cycle and reached this position soon after cell division (Figure 6B).
Figure 1: Schematic of the experimental set-up used throughout this study. (A) A metal or plastic frame serves as a support for the sample. A coverslip is fixed to the metal frame with tape to reduce motion of the sample. (B) Side view of the experimental sample set-up. Cells are mounted onto the coverslip shown in (A). The agarose pad that supplies nutrients and humidity to the cells is placed on top of the cells. The agarose pad is covered by an additional coverslip to reduce evaporation. For high quality images, a 100X oil immersion phase contrast objective is used. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Phase contrast time-lapse microscopy of WT M. xanthus cells. Cells were followed for 24 h and images were acquired every 5 min. (A) Representative images of the same field of view every 5 min are shown. Colored arrows indicate directionality of movement of individual cells. The same color marks the same cell over time. Numbers indicate time in minutes. Scale bar: 5 µm. (B) Images of the same field of view after every hour are shown. Note that the same field of view is shown but because cells are moving, cells are constantly entering and leaving the field of view. Numbers indicate time in hours. Scale bar: 5 µm. PH: phase contrast. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Phase contrast time-lapse microscopy of non-motile M. xanthus cells. ΔmglA cells were followed for 24 h. Images were acquired every 5 min and representative images after every hour are shown. Selected cell division constrictions are marked with orange arrows. Numbers indicate time in hours. PH: phase contrast. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Fluorescence time-lapse microscopy of ParB-YFP in non-motile M. xanthus cells. Cells of a ΔmglA mutantexpressing parB-yfp in the presence of native parB (SA4749; ΔmglA; parB+/PnatparB–yfp) were followed for 24 h by phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. (A) Images were acquired every 20 min and representative images every hour until 10 h are shown, together with the same cells after 24 h. Images are shown in phase contrast (PH) and as overlay of phase contrast and the YFP signal. Selected cell divisions are marked with orange arrows. White and green arrows indicate ParB-YFP cluster duplication events, with the green arrows marking the translocating cluster. Numbers indicate time in hours. Scale bar: 5 µm. (B) Images were acquired as in (A) but are shown at higher temporal resolution. Numbers indicate time in minutes. Arrows are as in (A). Scale bar: 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Fluorescence time-lapse microscopy of FtsZ-GFP in non-motile M. xanthus cells. Cells of a ΔmglA mutant expressing ftsZ-gfp in presence of native ftsZ (SA8241; ΔmglA; ftsZ+/PnatftsZ–gfp) were followed for 24 h by phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. (A) Images were acquired every 20 min and representative images every hour until 10 h are shown, together with the same cells after 24 h. Images are shown in phase contrast (PH) and as overlay of phase contrast and GFP signal. Selected cell divisions are marked with orange arrows. White arrows indicate FtsZ-GFP clusters at midcell. Numbers indicate time in hours. Scale bar: 5 µm. (B) Images were acquired as in (A) but are shown at higher temporal resolution. Numbers indicate time in minutes. Green and white arrows mark FtsZ-GFP clusters in the left and right cells, respectively. Orange arrows indicate cell divisions. Scale bar: 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Fluorescence time-lapse microscopy of mCherry-PomX in non-motile M. xanthus cells. Non-motile ΔpomX cells accumulating mCherry-PomX (SA4797; ΔmglA; ΔpomX/PpomZ mCherry-pomX) were followed for 24 h by phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy every 20 min. (A) Representative images every hour until 10 h are shown, together with the same cells after 24 h. Images are shown in phase contrast (PH) and as overlay of phase contrast and mCherry signal. Selected cell divisions are marked with orange arrows. White and green arrows indicate mCherry-PomX clusters before and after splitting events, respectively. Numbers indicate time in hours. Scale bar: 5 µm. (B) Images were acquired as in (A) and are shown at higher temporal resolution. Arrows are as in (A). Scale bar: 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Bacterial strain | Relevant genotype1 | Reference |
DK1622 | Wildtype | 23 |
SA4420 | ΔmglA | 24 |
SA4749 | ΔmglA; parB+/attB::PnatparB-yfp (pAH7) | This study |
SA4797 | ΔmglA; ΔpomX/ attB::PpomZ mCherry-pomX (pAH53) | 16 |
SA8241 | ΔmglA;ftsZ+/ mxan18-19::PnatftsZ-gfp (pDS150) | This study |
Plasmids in brackets contain indicated gene fusions and were intergated at the indicated sites on the genome. Plasmids integrated at the attB site or the mxan18-19 intergenic region were expressed from their native promoter (Pnat) or the native promoter of pomZ (PpomZ). |
Table 1: List of bacterial strains used in this study.
Plasmids | Relevant characteristics | Reference |
pAH7 | Pnat parB-yfp;Mx8 attP; TetR | 19 |
pAH53 | PpomZ mCherry-pomX; Mx8 attP ; KmR | 16 |
pDS150 1 | Pnat ftsZ-gfp ; mxan18-19 ; TetR | This study |
pMR3691 | Plasmid for vanillate inducible gene expression | 18 |
pKA51 | Pnat ftsZ-gfp ; Mx8 attP; TetR | 17 |
1 pDS150: pDS150 is a derivative of pKA51 in which the Mx8 attP site was replaced with the mxan18-19 intergenic region. For this the mxan18-19 intergenic region was amplified from pMR3691 with primers Mxan18-19 fwd BsdRI (GCGATCATTGCGCGCCAGACGATAACAGGC) and Mxan18-19 rev BlpI (GCGGCTGAGCCCGCGCCGACAACCGCAACC) and cloned into pKA51. |
Table 2: List of plasmids used in this study.
Fluorescence live-cell imaging has become a powerful tool to study the spatiotemporal dynamics of bacterial cells. Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of motile and slow growing bacteria such as M. xanthus, however, has been challenging and was only performed for short time durations. Here, we present an easy-to-use and robust method for live-cell imaging of M. xanthus by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. This method allows the user to follow cells and fluorescently labeled proteins for several rounds of the cell cycle with single cell resolution.
There are several prerequisites that influence the success of live-cell imaging of slow growing M. xanthus cells including: 1) a solid surface for cell attachment; 2) the availability of nutrients and oxygen; 3) constant humidity and temperature; and 4) the optimization of experimental conditions such as exposure time and image acquisition frequency.
In our experimental set-up, we use thick agarose pads supplemented with nutrients. Using thick agarose pads as opposed to microfluidic devices to follow single cells has some fundamental benefits but also some drawbacks. First, the agarose pad not only provides a surface for M. xanthus cell attachment and movement but also sufficient nutrients for growth for at least 24 h. Second, snap shot analyses commonly used to study intracellular localization of fluorescently labeled proteins was previously done on the same type of agarose pads16,17,29. Therefore, data from snap shot analyses can be directly compared to data obtained with the method described here. Thirdly, agarose pads can be easily modified and supplemented with antibiotics or other supplements such as CuSO4 and vanillate that are commonly used for gene expression induction18,30. Finally, because cells are allowed to form microcolonies during the course of an experiment, this set-up also allows studying the effect of direct cell-cell interactions on the particular parameter being analyzed. This aspect is particularly important in the case of M. xanthus because this bacterium displays several contact-dependent interactions. The main drawback of this method is that the experimental conditions are preset for the duration of an experiment. By contrast, microfluidic devices generally allow changing the experimental conditions during the course of an experiment by adding for instance antibiotics31.
Free software packages (e.g., MicrobeJ, Oufti) are available to automatically analyze the growth of single cells and protein localization within individual cells. However, these software are only well-suited for the analysis of single cells or small groups of cells. Thus, it remains a challenge to automatically analyze the data generated for the 24 h recordings described here.
In summary, we described an easy-to-use and reproducible protocol to perform live-cell imaging with slow growing M. xanthus bacteria. We show that simple nutrient-supplemented agarose pads are sufficient to sustain growth for at least 24 h and allow for observing and analyzing protein localization and growth with single cell resolution over several generations.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the German Research Council (DFG) within the framework of the Transregio 174 "Spatiotemporal dynamics of bacterial cells" and the Max Planck Society.
DMI6000B with AFC | Leica microsystems | 11888945 | Automated inverted widefield fluorescence microscope with adaptive focus control |
Universal mounting frame | Leica microsystems | 11532338 | Stage holder for different sample sizes |
HCX PL FLUOTAR 100x/1.30 oil PH3 | Leica microsystems | 11506197 | Phase contrast objective |
Orca Flash 4.0 camera | Hamamatsu | 11532952 | 4.0 megapixel sCMOS camera for picture aquisition |
Filter set TXR ET, k | Leica microsystems | 11504170 | Fluorescence filter set, Ex: 560/40 Em: 645/75 |
Filter set L5 ET, k | Leica microsystems | 11504166 | Fluorescence filter set, Ex: 480/40 Em: 527/30 |
Filter set YFP ET, k | Leica microsystems | 11504165 | Fluorescence filter set, Ex: 500/20 Em: 535/30 |
ProScan III | Prior | H117N1, V31XYZEF, PS3J100 | Microscope automation controller with interactive control center |
EL 6000 light source | Leica microsystems | 11504115 | External fluorescence light source |
Incubator BLX Black | Pecon | 11532830 | Black incubation chamber surrounding the microscope |
Tempcontrol 37-2 digital | Leica microsystems | 11521719 | Automated temperature control for incubation chamber |
Gentmycin sulphate | Carl Roth | 0233.4 | Gentamycin |
Oxytetracylin dihydrate | Sigma Aldrich | 201-212-8 | Oxytetracyclin |
Kanamycin sulphate | Carl Roth | T832.3 | Kanamycin |
Filtropur BT25 0.2 bottle top filter | Sarstedt | 831,822,101 | Bottle top filter for sterilization of buffers |
Deckgläser | VWR | 630-1592 | Glass cover slip (60 x 22 mm, thickness: 0.7 mm) |
Seakem LE agarose | Lonza | 50004 | Agarose for microscopy slides |
Leica Metamorph AF | Leica microsystems | 11640901 | Microscope control software and software for picture analysis |
Tetraspeck Microsperes, 0.5 µm | ThermoFisher | T7281 | Fluorescent microspheres |
petri dish | Greiner Bio-one | 688102 | 120 mm x 120 mm x 17 mm squared petri dish for agarose pads |
BD Bacto Casitone | Becton Dickinson | 225930 | Casitone |
Parafilm M | VWR | 291-1213 | Parafilm |
Tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane | Carl Roth | AE15.2 | Tris |
Magnesium sulphate heptahydrate | Carl Roth | P027.2 | Magnesium sulphate |
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate p.a. | Carl Roth | 3904.1 | Potassium dihydrogen phosphate |
1% CTT medium: 1 % (w/v) BD Bacto™ casitone, 10 mM Tris-HCl ph 8.0, 1 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.6, 8 mM MgSO4 | Cultivation medium for M.xanthus | ||
TPM buffer: 10 mM Tris-HCl ph 8.0, 1 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.6, 8 mM MgSO4 | Buffer for preparation of microscopy slides for M.xanthus |