The overall goal of this protocol is to demonstrate how to present odorants of low volatility for single-sensillum recording from Drosophila olfactory receptor neurons that respond to long-chain cuticular pheromones.
Insects rely on their sense of smell to guide a wide range of behaviors that are critical for their survival, such as food-seeking, predator avoidance, oviposition, and mating. Myriad chemicals of varying volatilities have been identified as natural odorants that activate insect Olfactory Receptor Neurons (ORNs). However, studying the olfactory responses to low-volatility odorants has been hampered by an inability to effectively present such stimuli using conventional odor-delivery methods. Here, we describe a procedure that permits the effective presentation of low-volatility odorants for in vivo Single-Sensillum Recording (SSR). By minimizing the distance between the odor source and the target tissue, this method allows for the application of biologically salient but hitherto inaccessible odorants, including palmitoleic acid, a stimulatory pheromone with a demonstrated effect on ORNs involved in courtship and mating behavior1. Our procedure thus affords a new avenue to assay a host of low-volatility odorants for the study of insect olfaction and pheromone communication.
Drosophila ORNs respond to a vast number of odorants, with widely ranging carbon chain lengths and a variety of functional groups, including esters, alcohols, ketones, lactones, aldehydes, terpenes, organic acids, amines, sulfur compounds, heterocyclics, and aromatics2,3. Odorants varied in their physicochemical features can have markedly different volatilities, indicated by the vapor pressure of the compound. Notably, biologically relevant odorants for Drosophila melanogaster differ tremendously in their volatility. For example, Ir92a ORNs respond to ammonia4, which is highly volatile, with a vapor pressure of 6,432 mmHg at 20 °C. In contrast, Or67d ORNs respond to a male pheromone, cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA)5,6, the vapor pressure of which is 43 mmHg at 20 °C.
Studying the olfactory response to odorants of low volatility is particularly challenging with conventional odor-delivery methods, in which odorants are delivered via a carrier air stream over a relatively long distance (i.e. several centimeters). As such, the reported olfactory responses to a given low-volatility odorant can vary greatly, depending on the design of the odor-delivery system. For example, the reported response of Or67d ORNs to a high dose of cVA ranges from ~407 - >200 spikes/s6. Moreover, the ineffective delivery of cVA with conventional delivery methods is likely attributed to false-negative results, leading to the interpretation that cVA by itself is not sufficient to activate Or67d ORNs8. This interpretation was later challenged by another study using a close-range odor-delivery method9. It is therefore imperative to develop a robust odor-delivery system for the effective presentation of odorants of low volatility.
Recently, we identified several long-chain cuticular fatty acids as ligands for Or47b ORNs. They are housed in the type 4 Antennal Trichoid Sensillum (at4). Among the long-chain fatty acid odorants, we found that palmitoleic acid functions as an aphrodisiac pheromone that promotes male courtship by activating Or47b ORNs1. However, in another study using a conventional odor-delivery method, methyl laurate was shown to elicit responses from Or47b ORNs, while palmitoleic acid evoked no response when presented from the same distance10. Compared to cVA, long-chain fatty acids are even less volatile, with vapor pressures less than 0.001 mmHg at 25 °C11. The inherently low volatility of long-chain fatty acid odorants, which precludes efficient presentation to the antenna via conventional odor-delivery systems, likely accounted for the false-negative results10. This inconsistency highlights the inadequacy of conventional odor-delivery systems in presenting low-volatility odorants. It was previously shown that the effective delivery of fly cuticular odors requires close proximity between the odor source and the target tissue6. Thus, to fully characterize the effects of biologically active pheromones while mimicking the distance from which they are likely encountered by fruit flies in nature12,13, we agreed that minimal distance must be accorded high priority in our procedure.
Our method holds further advantages, including compatibility with standard electrophysiology rigs and techniques. Pre-existing rig setups require minimal modification to accommodate this protocol, and most SSR steps require only minor adjustments. This renders our technique readily accessible to researchers experienced in SSR. Furthermore, our technique allows for the presentation of low-volatility odorants with sharp onset and offset, correlating stimulus delivery with neuronal response. Finally, the hardware layout facilitates rapid exchanges between odorant cartridges, expediting data collection over a desired dosage range.
We begin by reviewing the preparation of reference and recording electrodes, Adult Hemolymph-Like (AHL) solution, odorant delivery cartridges, and the corresponding olfactometer. We then discuss the preparation of the palmitoleic acid odorant solutions, followed by the preparation of the fly for recording. We proceed to consider the criteria for selecting a trichoid sensillum to record and more closely examine the positioning of the odorant cartridge before presenting representative data acquired using this method. Finally, we conclude by exploring useful applications of this technique, some encountered issues, and their solutions.
1. Preparation of the Hardware for at4 Recording
2. Preparation of Palmitoleic Acid Odorant Solutions for Delivery
NOTE: Or47b ORNs respond to both cis– and trans-palmitoleic acid. As palmitoleic acid is unstable at RT, stocks are stored at -20 °C and used within a month upon opening. Ethanol is the solvent of choice for palmitoleic acid.
3. Preparation of Drosophila for Ready Access to the at4 Sensilla for In Vivo Electrophysiological Recordings
NOTE: WT flies (Berlin) are reared in standard cornmeal medium at 25°C in a 12:12 light-dark cycle. Upon eclosion, flies are separated by sex into groups of ten, whereby they are group-housed until 7 d of age. Or47b ORNs in both male and female flies respond to palmitoleic acid. For simplicity, only male flies are examined in the current study.
4. Recording of at4 Sensillum Activity from Or47b ORNs in the at4 Trichoids in Response to Palmitoleic Acid
Our technique was successfully applied to determine the relative efficacy of the trans (Figure 5A) versus cis (Figure 5B) isomers of palmitoleic acid. Our representative data demonstrates that trans-palmitoleic acid is a more effective ligand for Or47b ORNs when compared to the cis isoform (Figure 5C). A single neuron was recorded from each fly, with twelve flies recorded per dosage curve, for a total of 24 flies. The collective data were obtained from three independent repeats of the experiments, with 8 flies recorded in each. The error bars represent the s.e.m.
Of note, the distance between the opening of the odor cartridge and the head of the fly has a significant influence on the outcome of the recording. To elicit a significant response to palmitoleic acid in Or47b ORNs, we presented the odorant at close range, around 4 mm away from the antenna1 (Figure 6A). When palmitoleic acid is presented further away from the antenna (~11 mm), we could hardly observe any significant response from the same Or47b ORNs (Figure 6B). These results highlight the importance of the close-range presentation of palmitoleic acid (Figure 6C-D). The data were collected from parallel experiments from 6 male flies (Berlin, 7 d old). A single Or47b ORN was recorded/fly. The error bars represent the s.e.m.
Figure 1: Cartridge and Olfactometer Setup. (A) Preparation of odor cartridges. From left to right: a standard 200-µL pipette tip, the first and second cartridge sections, and a completed odorant cartridge. (B) The cartridge connected to the olfactometer, showing the downward angling of the second section. (C) Olfactometer setup depicting the odor delivery tube mounted on the micromanipulator, with an attached odorant cartridge. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Drosophila Preparation. (A) A complete preparation, showing the relative positions of the fly, coverslip, and holding rod. (B) Close-up view of the prep, showing the positioning of the fly, its antennal orientation, and its clypeus. The holding rod is placed over the arista, securing the third antennal segment to the double-sided tape. (C) Rig setup. All major components are annotated. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Identification of the at4 Sensillum for SSR. (A) 4X view of the prep, showing the reference electrode inserted in the clypeus, the holding rod atop the arista, and the recording electrode positioned near the third antennal segment. (B) 50X view of the electrode, poised for insertion into the at4 trichoid. Inset: Illustration of the position of the recording electrode. (C) Representative SSR traces of baseline spike activity, demonstrating good (top) or poor (bottom) signal-to-noise ratio. Good signal-to-noise ratio permits the reliable identification of at4A and at4C spikes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Cartridge Placement. (A) The odorant cartridge is aimed squarely at the head of the fly from a distance of a few mm. (B) Another view of the prep and olfactometer from a different angle. (C) A close-up view of the prep and olfactometer, showing the position of the odorant cartridge above the fly-prep slide. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Representative Traces and Dosage Curves of Or47b ORNs in Response to cis– or trans-palmitoleic Acid. (A-B) SSR from the at4A ORNs that express the Or47b receptor with trans– (A) or cis-palmitoleic acid (B). Recordings were performed with 7-day-old WT Berlin males. Corresponding spike rasters (middle) and a peri-stimulus time histogram (bottom, binned at 50 ms) are shown below the sample traces (n = 12). (C) Dose-response curves comparing the Or47b ORN spike responses to cis– or trans-palmitoleic acid. Mean ±s.e.m. (*p <0.05; **p <0.01; t-test). Ctrl: Negative control without palmitoleic acid. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: The activation of at4A by palmitoleic acid requires close-range stimulation. (A-B) SSR from the at4A ORNs in 7-day-old wildtype Berlin males. cis-palmitoleic acid was delivered at a close range (~4 mm) or further away (~11 mm) (n = 6). (C) Comparison of the corresponding spike responses (binned at 50 ms, smoothed peri-stimulus time histograms). (D) Comparison of the corresponding average spike responses. The responses of at4A to palmitoleic acid drop markedly as the stimulus distance increases. Reprinted with permission from Figure S4 in reference1. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Here, we described a procedure by which the responses of Or47b ORNs to palmitoleic acid can be robustly induced and recorded. We modified a conventional long-distance odor delivery method2,7,10 to troubleshoot the problem of insufficient pheromone odorant delivery. We addressed the issue of low odorant volatility by delivering the compound via odorant cartridges, the opening of which are positioned within millimeters of the prep. When consideration is given to the consistent construction and placement of each odorant cartridge, this protocol manifests itself as an effective method of presenting otherwise inaccessible odorants in a reproducible manner.
The close-range odor presentation procedure described here is significant with respect to existing odor delivery methods. It permits a variety of future applications, including screening other low-volatility odorants for responses in not only ORNs housed in trichoid sensilla1, but those found in any sensillum type. The procedure allows for the efficient delivery of pheromone odorants via a pulse of air instead of by physically moving a glass capillary carrying the odorants towards the antennae6. Our modification minimizes the possibility of touching the tissue directly with the odorant-containing glass capillary, as supported by the experimental results in which we observed palmitoleic acid-elicited responses only after we delivered the odor pulse. In addition, our method provides excellent temporal control of rapid odor onset and offset.
It should be noted that, despite the demonstrated potential of the procedure, it is not without limitations. In our procedure, the positioning of the cartridge relies entirely upon manual adjustment, which renders it technically difficult to place the cartridge precisely at the same location from trial to trial. In addition, special attention to critical steps of the protocol is required to ensure it is successfully executed. Occasionally, highly variable responses to a given odor concentration are encountered. In most cases, the cause is traced to inconsistent cartridge placement. In addition, stringent selection criteria for at4 sensilla must be observed before recording. Uniform at4A spike sizes of high signal-to-noise ratios (Figure 3C) are a key benchmark, while a modest basal firing rate indicates the absence of neuronal damage. The degree of technical difficulty of this procedure is more than offset by its ability to deliver pheromone odorants from ranges that closely simulate the observed proximity between a courting male and the target female.
In summary, our method of odorant presentation offers access to palmitoleic acid for use in SSR from Or47b ORNs. However, the application of this technique is not limited to a single pheromone, but is readily adaptable to any other low-volatility odorant of choice, making it a versatile analytical technique when assaying previously inaccessible odorants.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Ye Zhang for the help with the sample traces and Tin Ki Tsang for the help with the pictures. This work was supported by a Ray Thomas Edwards Foundation Early Career Award and an NIH grant (R01DC015519) to C.-Y.S. and NIH grants (R01DC009597 and R01DK092640) to J.W.W.
Prep Setup & Miscellaneous Materials | |||
Pipette Puller Instrument | Sutter Instruments Novato CA USA |
P97 | Pipette Puller |
Borosilicate Glass Capillaries | World Precision Instruments Sarasota FL USA |
1B100F-4 | to make holding rods |
Aluminosilicate Glass Capillaries | Sutter Instruments Novato CA USA |
AF100-64-10 | to make electrodes |
Superfrost Microscope Slides | Fisher Scientific Pittsburgh PA USA |
12-550-143 | for fly-prep station |
Permanent Double Sided Tape | Scotch St. Paul MN USA |
NA | for fly-prep station |
Upright microscope | Olympus Shinjuku Tokyo Japan |
BX51 | for recording rig |
Plastalina modeling clay | Van Aken North Charleston SC USA |
B0019QZMQQ | for prep station and to stablize the holding rod |
Rapid-Flow Sterile Disposable Filter Unit with SFCA Membrane, 0.45 mm | Nalgene Rochester NY USA |
#156-4045 | to sterilize AHL solution |
Name | Company | Catalog Number | コメント |
Cartridge Materials | |||
200 µL pipette tip | VWR Radnor PA USA |
53508-810 | to make odor cartridges and fly prep |
Filter Paper | Whatman Maidstone Kent UK |
740-E | to make odor cartridges |
Vacuum Desiccator | Cole-Parmer Vernon Hills IL USA |
VX-06514-30 | to vaporize ethanol solvent |
Name | Company | Catalog Number | コメント |
Odorant Materials | |||
cis-palmitoleic acid | Cayman Chemical Ann Arbor MI USA |
#10009871 (CAS # 373-49-9) | Or47b odorant |
trans-palmitoleic acid | Cayman Chemical Ann Arbor MI USA |
#9001798 (CAS # 10030-73-6) | Or47b odorant |
Ethanol | Spectrum Chemical MFG. New Brunswick NJ USA |
E1028-500MLGL | to dilute palmitoleic acid |
Name | Company | Catalog Number | コメント |
Rig Setup Materials | |||
Odorant Cartridge Micromanipulator | Siskiyou Grants Pass OR USA |
MX130R | to position the olfactometer |
Flow Vision software | Alicat Tuscon AZ USA |
FLOWVISIONSC | software to control flow rate |
Mass Controller | Alicat Tuscon AZ USA |
MC-2SLPM-D | to control the flow rate for humidified air |
Mass Controller | Alicat Tuscon AZ USA |
MC-500SCCM-D | to control the flow rate for odor stimulation |
Clampex | Molecular Devices Sunnyvale CA USA |
Ver. 10.4 | Data acquisition software |
Air delivery tube | Ace Glass Vineland NJ USA |
8802-936 | to deliver humidified air |
50x objective lens | Olympus Shinjuku Tokyo Japan |
LMPLFL50X | recording rig |
Clampfit 10 | Molecular Devices Sunnyvale CA USA |
Ver. 10.4 | software for spike analysis |
Igor Pro 6 | WaveMetrics Lake Oswego OR USA |
Ver. 6.37 | software for data analysis |
Audio Monitor | ALA Scientific Instruments Farmingdale NY USA |
NPIEXB-AUDIS-08B | Aurally reports individual spikes |
Extracellular Amplifier | ALA Scientific Instruments Farmingdale NY USA |
NPIEXT-02F | to increase the amplitude of electrical signals |
Valve Controller | Warner Instruments | VC-8 | to control the opening of the valve for odor stimulation |
Recording Electrode Micromanipulator | Sutter Instruments Novato CA USA |
MP-285 | to position recording electrode |
Headstage Amplifier | ALA Scientific Instruments Farmingdale NY USA |
EQ-16.0008 | to increase the amplitude of electrical signals |
Oscilloscope | Tektronix Beaverton OR USA |
TDS2000C | Visual report of individual spikes |