This protocol describes histological analyses of the livers from zebrafish larvae that have been treated with 2% ethanol for 24 h. Such acute ethanol treatment results in hepatic steatosis and swelling of the hepatic vasculature.
Alcoholic Liver Disease (ALD) refers to damage to the liver due to acute or chronic alcohol abuse. It is among the leading causes of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality and affects more than 2 million people in the United States. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying alcohol-induced liver injury is crucial for developing effective treatment for ALD. Zebrafish larvae exhibit hepatic steatosis and fibrogenesis after just 24 h of exposure to 2% ethanol, making them useful for the study of acute alcoholic liver injury. This work describes the procedure for acute ethanol treatment in zebrafish larvae and shows that it causes steatosis and swelling of the hepatic blood vessels. A detailed protocol for Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining that is optimized for the histological analysis of the zebrafish larval liver, is also described. H&E staining has several unique advantages over immunofluorescence, as it marks all liver cells and extracellular components simultaneously and can readily detect hepatic injury, such as steatosis and fibrosis. Given the increasing usage of zebrafish in modeling toxin and virus-induced liver injury, as well as inherited liver diseases, this protocol serves as a reference for the histological analyses performed in all these studies.
Alcoholic Liver Disease (ALD), which is caused by alcohol overconsumption, is a major cause of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality. In the United States, nearly half of liver disease deaths involve alcohol1, and ALD is responsible for almost 1 in 3 liver transplants2. ALD has a broad spectrum. Steatosis, which is characterized by excess lipid accumulation in hepatocytes, occurs in the early stage of heavy drinking and is reversible upon cessation of alcohol use. Under the influence of genetic and environmental factors and continuing alcohol intake, hepatic steatosis can progress to alcoholic hepatitis and, eventually, cirrhosis 3. Studies using the rodent ALD models have provided substantial insights into the disease, but they have limitations (reviewed in reference3). Oral feeding of an alcohol diet only causes steatosis in rodents4,5. Development of inflammation and fibrosis requires either a second insult6,7 or chronic intragastric infusion, which is invasive and technically challenging8,9. The teleost zebrafish also develops liver injury in response to both chronic and acute alcohol treatment10,11,12,13,14,15. In particular, the larval zebrafish represents an attractive complementary model organism in which to study acute alcoholic liver injury10,11,13,15. The zebrafish liver is functional and produces key enzymes for ethanol metabolism by 4 days post-fertilization (dpf)13,16,17.Ethanol can be directly added to the water, and exposure to 2% ethanol for 24 h is sufficient to induce hepatic steatosis and fibrogenic responses in zebrafish larvae13,15.
It has been reported that treatment with 2% ethanol for 24 h resulted in a tissue ethanol concentration of 80 mM in zebrafish larvae13. Others have shown that larvae tolerate this concentration and the liver phenotypes seen in the treated animals are specific to ethanol exposure11,13,15,18. However, because 80 mM is nearly lethal in humans19, it is important to evaluate the liver histology of the ethanol-treated zebrafish and determine the physiological relevance to humans.
The rapid external development and translucence of zebrafish larvae make it possible to characterize the action of alcohol within the liver in real-time and in fixed samples. The availability of cell type-specific fluorescent transgenic lines and the recent advances in confocal microscopy facilitate the study of how different liver cell types change their morphology and behavior in response to acute ethanol treatment11,15. However, confocal imaging of the fluorescent transgenic zebrafish cannot completely substitute for Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining when studying liver histology. Marking all liver cell types at the same time using transgenic zebrafish requires the generation of individual transgenic lines, each labeling one liver cell type with a unique fluorophore. Introducing different transgenic backgrounds into the same fish requires breeding multiple generations, which is time-consuming and costly. Additional immunofluorescence staining is needed to detect extracellular matrix components. H&E staining, on the other hand, simultaneously labels all liver cell types and extracellular matrix components, thus providing an overview of the liver20. Moreover, it readily reveals several histopathological features of liver diseases, such as hepatocyte death, steatosis, and fibrosis. Although H&E is a routine stain in mammalian liver histology, it is not commonly used in zebrafish liver research, and the protocol is less well established.
This work describes a protocol for acute ethanol treatment in zebrafish larvae and for the follow-up histological analyses with H&E staining. The H&E staining protocol can be used in all studies of liver development and function. Moreover, the paraffin sections can be used for immunohistochemistry, as well as for other special stains in liver pathology, including the trichrome stain, reticulin stain, etc.
AB WT adult and larval zebrafish were maintained under standard conditions21 in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institutes of Health publication 86-23, revised 1985); their use was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC).
1. Preparation of Solutions
2. Perform Acute Ethanol Treatment in Zebrafish Larvae
3. Preparation of Tissue Cassettes and Processing
4. Sectioning of Paraffin Blocks
5. Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Paraffin Sections
6. Imaging and Storage of Stained Slides
10% buffered formalin and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) are two of the most common fixatives used for histology practices. However, they do not give optimal fixation results for zebrafish liver tissue (Figure 1 and Table 1). Fixation with 10% formalin or 4% PFA often results in shrinkages, creating large gaps between the liver and surrounding tissues (Figure 1A, B; Figure 1B provides an example of tissue shrinkage). Portions of the liver tissue may also fall out of the section. The cytoplasm of the hepatocytes is often lost (Figure 1A, 1B). Both fixatives can cause distortion of the hepatocytes, as they either shrink or swell and no longer maintain the columnar morphology that is characteristic for epithelial cells. One additional issue with the PFA fixation is that there are spaces between the hepatocytes that are not real, which cause the tissue to look fractured (Figure 1B). Furthermore, when either of these two fixatives is used, the hepatocytes are stained well with hematoxylin, but less so with eosin (Figure 1A). The acid-based Dietrich's fixative overcomes the issues with the formalin and PFA fixatives (Figure 1C).
In human ALD, steatosis, which is composed of small- and large-droplet fat, is most prominent near the central vein and extends outward toward the portal triad with increasing severity22. In zebrafish, treatment with 2% ethanol from 96-120 hpf also induces hepatic steatosis, which is implicated by the excessive deposition of round droplets in the hepatocytes (Figure 2B, arrows). However, the droplets do not exhibit a similar distribution pattern as seen in human ALD, because there is no clear distinction of portal and central veins in the zebrafish liver23. The hepatic blood vessels in the ethanol-treated larval liver are swollen compared to those in the control liver (Figure 2B, asterisks).
Figure 1: Comparisons of H&E Staining in the Livers of the Zebrafish Larvae that were Fixed with Differert Fixatives at 120 hpf. (A) 10% Formalin at RT O/N; (B) 4% PFA at 4 °C O/N; (C) Dietrich's fixative at RT for 24 h. With 10% formalin, the hepatocytes often lose their cytoplasm (A). The tissue is not stained properly with eosin and appears purple. After fixation with 4% PFA, gaps are seen between the hepatocytes (B). 4% PFA causes the liver tissue to shrink, so there appears to be a large gap between the liver and the surrounding tissues. The dashed line in B marks the border of the surrounding tissues. Dietrich's fixative provides the optimal result among the three (C). Scale bar = 20 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Acute Ethanol Treatment Causes Hepatic Steatosis and Blood Vessel Swelling in Zebrafish Larval Livers. (A) H&E staining of the liver in a control, untreated, WT larva. (B) H&E staining of the liver in a wil type larva that was treated with 2% ethanol from 96 – 120 hpf. Both animals were fixed with Dietrich's fixative at 120 hpf. Arrows in (B) point to the hepatocytes with excessive deposition of round droplets. Asterisks mark the swollen hepatic blood vessels. Scale bar = 20 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
10% formalin | 4% PFA | Dietrich’s fixative | |
Fixation condition | At least 24 h at RT | 3 h at RT or O/N at 4 °C | At least 24 h at RT |
Sample storage post fixation | Indefinitely at RT | Up to 2 weeks at 4 °C | Up to 2 months at RT |
Compatibility with genomic DNA extraction | Yes | Yes | No |
Shrinkages | Yes | Yes | Minimum |
Distortion of cells | Yes | Yes | Minimum |
Loss of cellular details | Yes | Modest | Minimum |
Balanced H&E stain | Weak eosin stain | Weak eosin stain | Yes |
Compatibility with immunohistochemistry | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Table 1: Comparisons of 10% formalin, 4% PFA, and Dietrich's Fixatives for Zebrafish Liver Histology.
The current protocol describes a detailed procedure for acute ethanol treatment in zebrafish larvae and the subsequent histopathological analyses with H&E staining. Acute ethanol treatment should be conducted at no earlier than 96 h post-fertilization, as this is the stage at which the zebrafish liver starts to express alcohol-metabolizing enzymes13. 2% ethanol is the maximal dose that larvae can tolerate13,14. The ethanol-treated larvae begin to show hepatic steatosis by 8 h of treatment, and the percentages of larvae developing steatosis continue to rise until 24 h of continuous treatment14. Zebrafish larvae absorb nutrients exclusively from the yolk until 120 hpf. Therefore, ethanol treatment beyond 120 hpf is not recommended, because fasting can also contribute to steatosis14. Compared to protocols published by other laboratories13,24, the main modification made in the current protocol is that the ethanol treatment is conducted in a fish facility that has a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle. This results in more consistent and robust steatotic responses than those seen when the treatment is conducted in the dark in an incubator. This may be related to the fact that the lipid metabolic genes in the zebrafish liver show daily rhythm expression in response to the light/dark cycle25.
ALD is a chronic disease and takes years of alcohol abuse. The critical limitation of the current ethanol treatment protocol is that it only triggers the acute effects of alcohol on the liver. Treatment with such a high ethanol concentration for more than 48 h causes high mortality, preventing the study of chronic liver injury. A recent study found that continuous treatment of adult zebrafish with 1% ethanol for up to three months led to steatosis, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis12. One promising future direction could be to identify a potential modulator of ALD using the acute ethanol treatment protocol and then to validate its effect in the chronic injury model.
H&E staining is performed to evaluate the hepatocellular damages that are induced by acute ethanol treatment. Due to the ease of performing fluorescence imaging in zebrafish, H&E staining is not routinely used in zebrafish liver histology, and the procedure is less well described. The current protocol provides a step-by-step description of H&E staining in the larval liver. Choosing the correct fixative is the first and most essential step for H&E staining. Although 10% buffered formalin and 4% PFA are commonly used in histology, they both cause tissue shrinkages and portions of the liver falling out of the section. 10% formalin fixation leads to the loss of cytoplasm in the hepatocytes. 4% PFA fixation results in artificial gaps between the hepatocytes. Eosin staining seems to be much weaker than hematoxylin staining in the livers that are fixed with either fixative. The acid-based Dietrich's fixative is more suited for H&E staining of the zebrafish liver, as it preserves cellular details and minimizes shrinkage. It also seems to penetrate fatty tissue, such as the liver, faster than formalin and PFA. The staining with hematoxylin and eosin is more balanced. One caveat of Dietrich's fixative is that it is not compatible for genomic DNA extraction. In a trial experiment, genomic DNA was extracted from the larvae that were fixed using 10% formalin, 4% PFA, or Dietrich's fixative26. The larvae were incubated in 50 µL of 50 mM NaOH at 95 °C for 20 min and were then cooled to 4 °C. 5 µL of 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 were then added to neutralize the basic solution. After a brief centrifugation, the supernatant was used in PCR. With the same PCR primers and PCR program, the genomic DNA from both the formalin- and PFA-fixed larvae yielded PCR products with the predicted sizes, whereas the genomic DNA from the Dietrich's fixative-fixed larvae failed to yield any PCR products.
H&E staining can be conducted on both paraffin sections and frozen sections. However, paraffin sections have the following advantages over frozen sections: 1) Whereas paraffin sections can be stored at room temperature indefinitely, frozen sections can only be stored at -80 °C for up to a year. 2) For frozen sections, the formation of ice crystals within the cells may perturb the cell morphology and subcellular detail. Moreover, frozen sections are often thicker than paraffin sections. This can result in poor images of tissue morphology compared to those produced from paraffin sections.
When preparing paraffin blocks for liver tissues, the current protocol embeds the larvae in agarose. The larvae are positioned laterally, with the left side of the body facing down and lying flat against the bottom of the mold. This ensures the consistent orientation of the livers, so that when sections are cut sequentially, equivalent regions of the liver can be compared from fish to fish27. Another key step that ensures successful H&E staining is the color development. It is crucial to check the staining frequently until the desired color intensity is reached.
H&E staining should be used to obtain a preliminary assessment of liver injury. The ethanol-treated larvae show excessive deposition of round droplets in the hepatocytes, suggestive of steatosis13,14,18. Labeling with lipid dyes, such as Oil Red O and Nile Red, is necessary to confirm that these droplets are indeed lipids. The hepatic blood vessels in the treated animals appear dilated and swollen. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy should be performed to examine the ultrastructural changes in the sinusoids. It has been previously reported that extracellular matrix protein deposition is increased in the ethanol-treated zebrafish liver, as detected by immunofluorescence18. However, given that the expression levels of fibrogenic genes are only modestly increased in the treated fish18, H&E may not be sensitive enough to detect such a small amount of extracellular matrix proteins. The same fixative and staining methods were tested on the chronically injured adult zebrafish livers and were sufficient for detecting fibrosis (Yin, unpublished data).
Although the current protocol is tailored to the examination of liver histology in zebrafish larvae, it has a broader application to the zebrafish research community, as the same protocol can be applied to other tissues and to adult zebrafish.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Katy Murray at the Zebrafish International Resource Center; Dr. Stacey Huppert and Kari Huppert at CCHMC, for their helpful advice on the protocol; and CCHMC veterinary service, for the fish care. This work was supported by NIH grant R00AA020514 and a research grant from the Center for Pediatric Genomics at CCHMC (to C.Y.). It was also support in part by NIH grant P30 DK078392 (Integrative Morphology Core) of the Digestive Disease Research Core Center in Cincinnati.
1.5 mL centrifuge tubes | E & K Scientific | 280150 | |
15 mL conical tubes | VWR International | 89039-664 | |
50 mL conical tubes | VWR International | 89039-658 | |
95% ethanol | Decon Labs, Inc. | 2801 | Flammable |
Acetic acid | Newcomer Supply | 10010A | Irritant |
Agarose | Research Products International | 9012-36-6 | |
Aluminum jar rack holder | Newcomer Supply | 5300JRK | |
Bacteriological petri dishes with lid | Corning | 351029 | |
Biopsy pads | Simport | M476.1 | |
Charged slides | Fisher Scientific | 12-550-16 | |
Clear mounting media | Fisher Scientific | 8310-16 | Can be substituted with other clear mounting media |
Commercial sea salts | Instant Ocean | SS15-10 | |
Disposable microtome blades | Fisher Scientific | 4280L | |
Dissecting microscope | Leica Biosystems | Leica Mz 95 | |
Enclosed tissue processor | Leica Biosystems | ASP300 S | |
Eosin-Phloxine stain set | Newcomer Supply | 1082A | |
Ethyl alcohol | Sigma-Aldrich | E7023 | Flammable |
Formaldehyde solution, ACS reagent, 37 WT. % in H20, contains 10-15% methanol as stabilizer (to prevent polymerization) | Sigma-Aldrich | 252549 | A suspected carcinogen; irritant |
Formalin, Buffered, 10% | Fisher Scientific | SF100-4 | A suspected carcinogen; irritant |
Graduated media bottle | VWR International | 16159-520 | |
Harris hematoxylin | Poly Scientific R&D Corp. | s212 | Irritant |
Histology molds | Sakura Finetek USA Inc | 4557 | |
Hot plate/Stirrer | VWR International | 47751-148 | |
Hydrochloric acid | Fisher Scientific | A144 | Irritant |
Incubator | VWR International | 97058-220 | |
Insulin syringes | BD Medical | BD-309301 | |
Inverted compound microscope | Carl Zeiss Microscopy | 491912-9850-000 | |
Isopropanol | Newcomer Supply | 12094E | Flammable |
Methylene blue | Sigma-Aldrich | M9140 | Irritant |
Microtome | Leica Biosystems | Leica Jung BioCut 2035 | |
Nutating mixer | VWR International | 82007-202 | |
Paraformaldehyde | Sigma-Aldrich | P6148-1KG | A suspected carcinogen; irritant |
Pasteur pipet | VWR International | 53283-916 | |
Pipette pump (10 mL) | VWR International | 53502-233 | |
Potassium chloride (KCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | P9541 | |
Potassium phosphate, monobasic (KH2PO4) | Sigma-Aldrich | P9791 | |
Razor blades | Grainger | 4A807 | |
Slide Staining Kit | Newcomer Supply | 5300KIT | |
Sodium chloride (NaCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | S3014 | |
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) | Fisher BioReagents | S318-500 | Very hazardous |
Sodium phosphate, dibasic (Na2HPO4) | Sigma-Aldrich | S3264 | |
Stainless steel strainer (5 inch diameter) | Adaptive Science Tools | L0906045in | |
Tissue cassettes | Simport | M505.12 | |
Tissue embedding center | Sakura Finetek USA Inc | #5100 | |
Tissue wipers, 1-Ply | Fisher Scientific | 06666A | |
Transfer pipets | Fisher Scientific | 137117M | |
Tricaine powder/Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate salt | Sigma-Aldrich | A5040 | Irritant |
Tris base, primary standard and buffer | Sigma-Aldrich | T1503 | |
Wash bottle, low-density polyethylene, wide mouth | Nalge Nunc International | 2402-0750 | |
Xylenes | Fisher Scientific | X3S-4 | Irritant |