A method to determine the time course of ethanol concentration in the brains of rats during operant ethanol self-administration is described. Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection is used to quantify ethanol in the dialysate samples, because it has the sensitivity required for the small volumes that are generated.
Operant self-administration methods are commonly used to study the behavioral and pharmacological effects of many drugs of abuse, including ethanol. However, ethanol is typically self-administered orally, rather than intravenously like many other drugs of abuse. The pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs are more complex than intravenously administered drugs. Because understanding the relationship between the pharmacological and behavioral effects of ethanol requires knowledge of the time course of ethanol reaching the brain during and after drinking, we use in vivo microdialysis and gas chromatography with flame ionization detection to monitor brain dialysate ethanol concentrations over time.
Combined microdialysis-behavioral experiments involve the use of several techniques. In this article, stereotaxic surgery, behavioral training and microdialysis, which can be adapted to test a multitude of self-administration and neurochemical centered hypotheses, are included only to illustrate how they relate to the subsequent phases of sample collection and dialysate ethanol analysis. Dialysate ethanol concentration analysis via gas chromatography with flame-ionization detection, which is specific to ethanol studies, is described in detail. Data produced by these methods reveal the pattern of ethanol reaching the brain during the self-administration procedure, and when paired with neurochemical analysis of the same dialysate samples, allows conclusions to be made regarding the pharmacological and behavioral effects of ethanol.
1. Stereotaxic Surgery
2. Operant Training
3. Pre-microdialysis Procedures: Tethering
4. Pre-microdialysis Procedures: The Microdialysis Probe is Inserted the Day Before the Microdialysis Experiment, after the Rat has Completed Behavioral Training for the Day
5. Microdialysis Procedures: Collection of Samples During Self-administration Session with Appetitive and Consummatory Phases Separated
6. Microdialysis Procedures: Preparation of Microdialysis Sample for Ethanol Analysis
7. Post-microdialysis Procedures
8. Analysis of Samples for Ethanol Concentration
9. Ethanol Data
10. General Maintenance: The Fiber Should be Changed Every 500 punctures, and the Septum Every 100 Punctures
To change the fiber
To change the septum
11. Representative Results
Figure 1 shows example chromatograms for three concentrations of ethanol standards and for a rat dialysate sample collected at the end of the ethanol self-administration session. Ethanol peaks should be relatively symmetric, have consistent retention times, and a signal to noise ratio > 10. Failure to meet these criteria means that your system requires maintenance. Quality chromatography and correctly prepared standards produce a linear standard curve (R2 ≥ 0.99; Figure 2A) that is used to calculate the ethanol concentration of dialysate samples collected from ethanol self-administering animals over the course of their self-administration session (Figure 2B).
Figure 1. Example chromatograms. One μl of ethanol standard or dialysate sample was loaded into a gas chromatograph vial and analyzed as described in the text. A) Overlay of peaks generated from 2.5, 5.0 and 10 mM ethanol standards. B) Peak generated from a dialysate sample from a rat that has self-administered ethanol.
Figure 2. Graphical results from example experiment shown in Figure 1. A) Ethanol standard curve. B) Time course of dialysate ethanol concentration across an ethanol self-administration session.
Hardware | Parameter | Start-up setting | Running setting | Resting setting |
8,400 Bruker (Varian) Autosampler | ||||
Injection mode | Spme | Spme | n/a | |
Solvent penetration depth | 0% | 20% | n/a | |
Sample penetration depth | 20% | 20% | n/a | |
Absorption time | 0.01 min | 3 min | n/a | |
Desorption time | 19 min | 1 min | n/a | |
Clean mode solvent source | I | I | n/a | |
Clean mode adsorption and desorption time | 0.01 min | 0.01 min | n/a | |
Water bath (heats autosampler)* | 50 °C | 50 °C | Off | |
CP-3800 Varian Gas Chromatograph | ||||
Injector Oven | Oven power | On | On | On |
Oven temperature | 250 °C | 220 °C | 30 °C | |
Column Oven | Stabilization time | 0.10 min | 0.10 min | 0.10 min |
Temperature | 65 °C | 65 °C | 30 °C | |
Column | Mobile phase flow rate | 8.5 ml/min | 8.5 ml/min | n/a |
Column Pressure | ~ 6 psi | ~ 6 psi | ≥ 0.1 psi | |
FID detector | Oven power | On | On | On |
Temperature | 220 °C | 220 °C | 120 °C | |
Electronics | On | On | Off | |
Time constant | Fast | Fast | Fast | |
Range | 11 | 11 | 11 | |
Autozero | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Table 2. Gas chromatograph with flame ionization detection system parameters. This table shows the parameters for the three programs used to prepare (start-up settings), run (running settings) and maintain the system while not in use (resting settings).
Applications and limitations
Drug self-administration is used in rodents to model drug addiction. Many drugs of abuse that are modeled in this fashion can be administered intravenously, in which the drug is delivered directly to the central compartment. This allows for close monitoring of dose over a self-administration session. Since ethanol is usually orally self-administered, it is much harder to monitor drug levels due to individual differences in absorption and metabolism. By using microdialysis to sample from the brain region of interest, we are not only able to monitor the pattern of ethanol reaching the region, but we are also able to simultaneously monitor neurotransmitter changes in the same region over time during each self-administration phase.
Neurochemical alterations and drug-induced responses in the brain are associated with drug abuse and dependence; thus, the ability to concurrently measure neurochemical and drug concentrations during specific self-administration phases provides a very powerful and unique tool. One issue to keep in mind for correlating dialysate concentrations of analytes with behavior is the physical characteristics of the microdialysis plumbing. Specifically, the time it takes for fluid to be transferred from the lumen of the microdialysis probe to the collection tube is critical, and shorter times are better. In our lab, we construct the probes so that the time is about 90 sec. Using these conditions, we have found that there is an accumbal dopamine increase at the initiation of ethanol consumption, which decreases over the course of the drink and post-drink periods as the dialysate ethanol concentration increases.2,3,8,9 These experiments, when combined with data from pharmacological studies, have allowed us to parse out the strictly pharmacological effects of ethanol and self-administration associated environmental cues on changes in neurotransmitter concentrations.
It should be noted that this particular application of combined behavioral-microdialysis techniques is suited to the current research interests of our laboratory. It is designed to evaluate the temporal pattern of ethanol reaching the brain in comparison to the pattern of neurotransmitter changes in the same region, so that we can relate these measures to synchronous self-administration behaviors. The derived dialysate ethanol concentrations are not corrected for in vivo probe recovery, and are only a fraction of the brain ethanol tissue concentration. If quantitative microdialysis of ethanol is required, the extraction fraction of ethanol that diffuses from the extracellular space into the probe should be experimentally determined. See previous publications from our laboratory for methods and further discussion.10,11,12
Although this protocol illustrates the use of gas chromatography along with solid phase microextraction of ethanol from the headspace of microdialysis samples, other methods for analysis of the ethanol content of the microdialysis sample could be used. However, alternative methods may suffer from some disadvantages. For example, less sensitive analytical methods may require a larger sample volume which necessitates sampling times greater than the 5-7 min illustrated here. The type of system discussed here uses a solid phase microextraction that concentrates the ethanol in the vapor phase in the sealed sample vial by allowing absorption to the fiber placed in the vial headspace. This improves the detection limit compared with direct headspace sampling which typically allows 50-100 μl of the vapor to be injected. Another major advantage of the headspace method is that the sample injected for analysis is extremely clean and free of salts. Direct injection of the liquid microdialysis sample may also be used with higher sensitivity, but this will require more instrument down time due to regular maintenance required for cleaning out the injected salts.
Trouble-shooting and other notes
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This research was supported by grants from NIH/NIAAA (AA11852 and AA007471).
Name of the reagent | Company | Catalogue number |
95% Ethanol | AAPER Alcohol and Chemical Co., Shelbyville, KY | E190, 111000190 |
Ultra-Pure Sucrose | MP Biomedicals, LLC, Solon, OH | 821721 |
Ultra High Purity Helium | Air Gas | HE UHP300 |
Air | Air Gas | AIZ300 |
Hydrogen | Air Gas | AIZ300 |
GC 2 ml vials | Agilent | #8010-0015 |
GC vial caps with PTFE/silicone septa | Agilent | #8010-0084 |
Table 1. Specific reagents