Source: Nolan, R., et al. Calibration-free In Vitro Quantification of Protein Homo-oligomerization Using Commercial Instrumentation and Free, Open Source Brightness Analysis Software. J. Vis. Exp. (2018)
This video demonstrates the technique of fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy (FFS) to study protein homo-oligomerization. Fluorescently-labeled proteins in a sample are dimerized using an agent when studying protein oligomerization using FFS. Using a confocal microscope, as the proteins move in and out of the small observation volume, the analysis of the fluctuations in the brightness of the fluorescent molecules is performed to determine the oligomeric state of the proteins.
1. FKBP12 F36V -mVenus Purification
2. Preparation of Multiwell Plate Array
3. Calibration-free Confocal Acquisition
4. Detrend and Brightness Analysis using the R Package nandb
Figure 1. Application of N&B to detect protein monomer-dimer transitions in solution. (a) Simplified optical path of a laser scanning microscope (LSM) equipped with a laser source (set at 514 nm in the case of mVenus labeled proteins) directed (blue arrows) toward an immersion objective (in our case a 63X1.4NA oil) illuminating a 100 nM solution of FKBP12F36V-mVenus solution. The emission fluorescence (green arrows) passes through a dichroic mirror and is directed toward a bandpass filter that cleans the emission light, and a pinhole set at 1 Airy unit situated right before a point digital detector capable of photon counting. (b) A confocal volume of illumination is scanned through 16 x 16 pixels illuminating single FKBP12F36V-mVenus molecules that enter and exit the Gaussian shape confocal volume producing an array of fluorescence intensity fluctuations. (c) Image series acquired over time
Figure 2. Automatic detrending is needed to accurately measure a population of monomers in solution. (a) A stack of 5000 16 x 16-pixel images was acquired as described in Protocol section. The intensity of the first frame is shown together with the average time-resolved intensity profile, which shows long-term fluctuations that might be related to bleaching and other solvent and/or photophysic effects. Whatever the cause for these long-term fluctuations, they impact the brightness calculations and hence require detrending. Without automatic detrend, one gets B = 1.026, whereas after automatic detrending, B = 1.005. Also, the brightness without (left panels, second row) and with (right panels, second row) smooth filtering is shown. (b) The same data presented in (a) was detrended and the results in terms of intensity and brightness shown.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
RosettaTM (DE3) pLysS cells | Novagen | 70956-3 | |
Ampicillin | Sigma Aldrich | PubChem Substance ID 329824407 | |
Chloramphenicol | Sigma Aldrich | PubChem Substance ID: 24892250 | |
LB starter culture | QIAGEN | ||
LB medium | QIAGEN | https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/head/search/external-link-icon.gif | |
IPTG | Sigma Aldrich | PubChem Substance ID 329815691 | |
IMAC buffer | Medicago | 09-1010-10 | |
EDTA-free protease inhibitors | Sigma Aldrich | 11873580001 | |
TALON resin | Clonetech | ||
Nickel sepharose | GE Healthcare | ||
S200 16/60 column | GE Healthcare | ||
Glass bottom 8-well observation dish | Ibidi | 80827 |