The goal of the current protocol is to outline the steps necessary to establish and use a social preference assay for adult zebrafish and demonstrate that it can be used to characterize ethanol-induced social defects.
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) describe all alcohol-induced birth defects. Birth defects such as growth deficiencies, craniofacial, behavioral, and cognitive abnormalities are associated with FASD. Social difficulties are common behavioral abnormalities associated with FASD and often result in serious health issues. Animal models are critical to understanding the mechanisms responsible for ethanol-induced social defects. Zebrafish are social vertebrates that produce externally fertilized transparent eggs; these characteristics provide researchers with a precise yet simple procedure for creating the FASD phenotype and an innate behavior that can be leveraged to model the social deficits associated with FASD. Thus, zebrafish are ideal for characterizing the social deficits of FASD. The goal of the current protocol is to provide the user with a simple behavioral assay that can be used to characterize the consequences of a negative environment early during development and the effects it can have on social behavior in adulthood. The protocol can be used to characterize the effect mutations or teratogens have on adult social behavior. The protocol outlined here demonstrates how to characterize the social behavior of individual fish during a 20-min social assay. Furthermore, the data obtained using the current protocol provides evidence that the protocol can be used to characterize the effects of embryonic ethanol-induced social defects in adult zebrafish.
Prenatal alcohol exposure can lead to a variety of birth defects collectively known as fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD)1. Impaired behavior, such as social difficulties, are common birth defects associated with FASD2,3. Unfortunately, social difficulties frequently result in serious mental health issues4, which can adversely affect the quality of life for individuals with FASD. Thus, understanding the mechanisms responsible for ethanol-induced social defects is paramount.
Zebrafish have biological and behavioral characteristics which make them well suited to advancing our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for ethanol-induced social defects. For instance, zebrafish produce large quantities of transparent externally fertilized eggs; these biological characteristics allow researchers to easily create precise and replicable FASD phenotypes5. To expose embryos to ethanol at 24 h postfertilization (hpf), one simply has to use a dissecting microscope to examine the transparent egg and stage the embryo based on previously published work such as Kimmel et al.6, then place the egg in the desired ethanol concentration for the desired duration. Since the chorion is a weak barrier to alcohol7, the ethanol readily bathes the embryo. To stop the exposure, one simply has to remove the eggs from the ethanol solution. Besides providing researchers with a simple yet accurate method for creating FASD phenotypes, zebrafish also allow researchers to make genetic comparisons to humans because 70% of human genes have a zebrafish orthologue, thus they are a valuable tool for understanding human diseases-related genes8. Additionally, unlike other animal models zebrafish form social groups9 called shoals10. Shoaling behavior can be used to characterize the effects embryonic ethanol exposure has on social behavior11. Furthermore, in zebrafish a social response can be elicited by using computer controlled social stimuli12 or a live social stimulus13.
Previous works have characterized the social response of adult zebrafish in groups14, however a limitation of this approach is the inability to correlate the behavior of an individual fish with a specific measure such as changes in neurotransmitter levels11. The following protocol will give users the ability to characterize the social behavior of an individual adult zebrafish. Since social behavior is acquired for individual fish, users of the protocol can now correlate the acquired behavioral profile of each fish with a dependent outcome. For example, previous work has shown that embryonic ethanol exposure impairs the dopaminergic response to a social stimulus11. While the data shown here has used embryonic ethanol exposure as the independent variable, protocol users can characterize the effects other pharmacological treatments or genetic mutations have on social behavior. Furthermore, protocol users are not limited to examine how embryonic treatments alter behavior but can also determine how acute pharmacological treatments in adult zebrafish impact social behavior15.
All methods described here have been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of South Dakota.
1. Zebrafish housing, care, and embryonic ethanol exposure
2. Randomization and tank setup
3. Conducting the social assay
Figure 2 has been modified from Fernandes et al.17 and shows that embryonic ethanol exposure blunts the shoaling response by examining the distance from the stimulus. The data in Figure 2 represents the distance from the social stimulus during the 20 min trial. The Y-axis shows the distance in centimeters while the X-axis shows the 20 min trial broken down into 1 min intervals. The black bar along the X-axis represents the time when the opaque barriers have been removed and the social stimulus is visible to the test fish. Across all groups initially there is a rapid decrease towards the social stimulus once it is made visible, which can be determined by the steep decrease in distance between minutes 9 and 10, however, while control fish remain very close to the social stimulus alcohol treated are not; this suggests that embryonic ethanol exposure affects adult social behavior12,18.
Figure 3 has been modified from Fernandes et al.17 and uses data gathered from measuring the distance to the stimulus to further show the effect embryonic ethanol exposure has on the shoaling response. The data in Figure 3 represents the reduction in the distance toward the social stimulus once it is visible. To calculate the average reduction in the distance to stimulus; the average distance to the stimulus during the stimulus period (when the stimulus is visible) was subtracted from the average distance to the stimulus during habituation (when the social stimulus is not visible), thus a larger negative value represents a stronger social response.
Figure 4 shows the time spent in the zones versus the distance to the stimulus. Figure 4 has been modified from Fernandes et al.17. Figure 4A shows the amount of time (Y-axis) fish spend in each zone (X-axis) while the stimulus is visible. While fish from all groups appear to show a preference for the zone closest to the social stimulus control fish spend almost twice the time in zone 1 compared to alcohol treated fish (Figure 4B). Figure 4C shows that embryonic ethanol exposure did not impair mobility, since there was no difference between groups across the zones. Finally, Figure 4D shows that in the absence of a social stimulus fish do not spend time in the zone closest to the social stimulus. Thus, the results show that control fish approach and stay very close to the social stimulus when visible, while ethanol treated fish do not. Furthermore, the data shown in Figure 2 and Figure 4C suggest that embryonic ethanol exposure does not impair the ability of fish to see the social stimulus (Figure 2) or move (Figure 4C), therefore providing strong evidence that embryonic ethanol exposure impairs social behavior in adult zebrafish.
Figure 1: Schematic of the behavioral apparatus. A 37 L tank was used to assay the social behavior of adult zebrafish (named ZT140) with and without embryonic ethanol exposure. This figure has been modified from Fernandes et al.17. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Embryonic ethanol exposure blunts the social behavior in adult zebrafish. Average distance between the adult experimental fish and the live shoal plotted for 1 min intervals of the 20 min behavioral session. Mean ± SEM are shown. Control (n = 12); 1% ethanol (EtOH; n = 11). The horizontal bar above the X-axis, from 10 to 20 min, depicts a timeline during which the live shoal is visible to the experimental subjects. The alcohol concentration is shown above the graphs. This figure has been modified from Fernandes et al.17. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Alcohol treated fish are significantly further way from the live shoal. Bars represent the difference between the distance of fish from the live shoal before and after the live shoal is visible. Larger negative values suggest a stronger response to the conspecifics. Mean ± SEM are shown. Mean ± SEM are shown. Control (n = 12); 1% ethanol (EtOH; n = 11). This figure has been modified from Fernandes et al.17. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Embryonic ethanol exposure alters the duration of time spent in zone 1 only when the live shoal is visible. (A) Bars represent the time spent in all 10 zones during stimulus presentation. (B) Bars represent the time spent in zone 1 during the stimulus presentation. Zone 1 is the zone closest to the live shoal, while zone 10 is the furthest away from the live shoal. Note the significant difference in the amount of time fish control fish spend in zone. (C) Bars represent the average percentage of time spent in all zones during habituation, the first 10 min. (D) Bars represent the time spent in zone 1 during habituation. Mean ± SEM are shown. Sample sizes are as follows: Control (n = 12); ethanol (EtOH; n = 11). This figure has been modified from Fernandes et al.17. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Zebrafish have a number of biological and behavioral characteristics making them a highly attractive organism for research involving genes, the environment, and behavior5,19. This protocol gives the end user a relatively simple guide to assay social behavior, multiple ways to quantity the social behavior, and has the potential to link the behavioral responses of individual fish with treatments such as embryonic ethanol exposure, genetic mutations, or other pharmacological substances.
To assay social behavior in adult zebrafish carefully follow this protocol in conjunction with the user’s manual of the tracking software of choice. To build the testing arena, one simply needs a 37 L tank with a lid and light, corrugated plastic, two smaller tanks for the social stimulus, and a camera; most of these items can be purchased at pet stores and any big box retailer. When a single zebrafish is presented with a group of zebrafish the natural behavior of the single zebrafish is to reduce the distance to the group while increasing the time spent in close proximity to the group19, this behavior is called a shoaling response19. The shoaling response is a social behavior that can be characterized in two ways: first, when the social stimulus is visible measure the distance between the social stimulus and the single fish12 and second measure the time spent in the zone closest to the social stimulus when it is visible. Having the ability to quantify the time zebrafish spend in a 5 cm zone when the social stimulus is visible provides strong evidence of the social response given that these fish on average are approximately 4 cm in length.
Dividing the 50 cm tank into 10, 5 cm areas aids in statistical analysis because the probability of the test fish being in any zone is the same. At first glance, having two measures for the same outcome appears to be redundant. However, redundancy can provide validation. Additionally, the distance and duration measures during habituation can be used to determine whether a treatment affects vision or movement. This protocol used commercially available automated tracking software13,18 but it is amenable to other tracking systems or even manual tracking by a trained observer.
Regardless of the tracking software used there are critical steps to be taken to optimize tracking. First, select a background that provides a significant contrast compared to the fish being recorded. Wild-type zebrafish have horizontal stripes that are golden and blue20; they also have mosaics of yellow xanthophores, silvery or blue iridophores, and black melanophores20. Thus, when characterizing the behavior of AB wild-type fish use a white background 12,13,17, on the other when characterizing the social behavior of a casper zebrafish that lack pigment use a black background17. Second, make sure that there is sufficient lighting to track the experimental fish. If there are multiple tracking arenas, ensure that the lighting is identical between the arenas. Another critical step is to make sure the water level in the 37 L tank matches the water level in the 1.4 L tanks, to ensure that the test fish cannot swim in areas that do not have the social stimulus. Additionally, ensure that the 1.4 L tank are in frame, when recording the videos; doing this will provide a backup in case manual coding of the data is required or verification of the stimulus side is needed.
Typical issues within the protocol are the subject not being tracked correctly, an insufficient habituation period and a brief time lag when pulling the opaque barriers when multiple arenas are set up. To avoid the subject not being tracked correctly ensure that there is sufficient contrast between the fish and background as mentioned earlier and the software’s guidelines are followed. Additionally, if the user’s software permits infrared tracking, this can alleviate issues associated with contrast. While 10 min may seem to be a long time for a habituation period, our unpublished work suggests that reducing the habituation time negatively impacts the protocol. Finally, if the opaque barrier between the 37 L and 1.4 L tanks are pulled manually and if multiple arenas are set up all the barriers cannot be pulled at exactly the same time, unless multiple people are pulling the barriers. Alternatively, if only one person is conducting the assay, then counterbalancing which arena barriers get pulled first should be implemented.
Though the protocol is straight forward, the cost of tracking software and the extra time need to characterize fish individually are potential pitfalls. This protocol used commercially available software to track the behavior of experimental fish which avoids observer bias and increases throughput by setting up multiple arenas and thus recording multiple fish. Even though commercial software was used in this protocol, other tracking software is available, including free software. Using this protocol with the end user’s tracking of choice will reproduce the social assay. In this protocol the behavior of an individual fish was characterized; others have focused on examining groups of zebrafish14 which is one way to address the potential pitfall of characterizing one fish at a time. Alternatively, as mentioned earlier, using multiple testing arenas at the same time can increase throughput while maintaining the ability to assign a behavioral profile with an individual fish. Maintaining the ability to correlate a behavioral profile of an individual fish is important because it gives the researcher the opportunity to look for variability within a treatment group. Although embryonic ethanol exposure was used as independent variable in the representative data, future applications of the technique outlined in the current protocol are not limited to simply characterizing the effects of embryonic ethanol exposure on social behavior. For example, one can determine the effect genetic mutations21 or other pharmacological treatments22 have on social behavior. Furthermore, besides embryonic ethanol exposure future works can characterize the effect other teratogens have on social behavior. Thus, the current protocol is useful to any researcher interested in understanding how genes and/or the environment affect social behavior.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Funding to support this research was provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) [R00AA027567] to Y.F.
1.4-l ZT140 Aquaneering tanks | Aquaneering | ZT140 | Tanks for social stimulus |
Aqueon 20" Deluxe Fluorescent Full Hood aquarium light | https://www.petco.com/shop/en/petcostore/product/aqueon-aquarium-black-24-fluorescent-deluxe-full-hood-215740 | Light for the 37-I tank | |
Aqueon Standard Open-Glass Glass Aquarium Tank, 10 Gallon | https://www.petco.com/shop/en/petcostore/product/aga-10g-20x10x12bk-tank-170917 | 37-l tank for the social assay | |
Ethanol | Fisher Scienticfic | BP28184 | |
Ethovision XT tracking system | https://www.noldus.com/ethovision-xt | ||
R-Capable Color Basler GigE Camera | https://www.noldus.com/ethovision-xt | ||
White corrugated plastic | https://www.homedepot.com/p/Coroplast-48-in-x-96-in-x-0-157-in-4mm-White-Corrugated-Twinwall-Plastic-Sheet-CP4896S/205351385 | Plastic to line the back and the bottom of the 37-I tank and back of the tanks used for the social stimulus |
.