We present a protocol to test the electrochemical and physical properties of a supercapacitor gel polymer electrolyte using a coin cell.
Supercapacitors (SC) have attracted attention as energy storage devices due to their high density and long cycle performance. SCs used in devices operating in stretchable systems require stretchable electrolytes. Gel polymer electrolytes (GPEs) are an ideal replacement for liquid electrolytes. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP) have been widely applied as a polymer-matrix-based electrolytes for supercapacitors because of their low cost, chemically stable, wide operating temperature range, and high ionic conductivities. Herein, we describe the procedures for (1) synthesizing a gel polymer electrolyte with PVA and PVDF-HFP, (2) measuring the electrochemical stability of the gel polymer electrolytes by cyclic voltammetry (CV), (3) measuring the ionic conductivity of the gel polymer electrolytes by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), (4) assembling symmetric coin cells using activated carbon (AC) electrodes with the PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based gel polymer electrolytes, and (5) evaluating the electrochemical performance using galvanostatic charge-discharge analysis (GCD) and CV at 25 °C. Additionally, we describe the challenges and insights gained from these experiments.
Flexible SCs have grown rapidly in recent years for the fabrication of electronics with stretchable displays and wearable energy devices. Flexible SCs typically consist of flexible electrodes1, separators2, and the electrolyte3 in a flexible assembly. Therefore, GPEs are the most effective structure owing to their flexibility4, separator-free nature, relatively high ionic conductivity5, and thin-film forming ability6.
To prepare the polymer matrices of GPEs, materials such as polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PVDF-HFP, and PVA have been developed in recent years. PVA and PVDF-HFP have especially been widely applied as polymer-matrix-based electrolytes for SCs due to their low cost, chemically stable, wide operating temperature range, and high ionic conductivities at room temperature (RT).
Herein, we describe a synthetic method for two representative polymer-matrix materials-PVA7 and PVDF-HFP-and the electrochemical characterization of the polymer-matrix material-based gel electrolyte. In summary, we illustrate the general synthesis, material processing methods, and performance evaluation methods employed to fabricate stretchable SCs.
For application in flexible SCs, polymer electrolytes should exhibit the following properties: (1) high ionic conductivity at ambient temperature, (2) high chemical and electrochemical stability, (3) good mechanical properties of dimensional stability, and (4) sufficient thin film processability. These features were confirmed using EIS, CV, and tensile tests. The EIS and CV measurements were conducted using a coin cell. First, the ionic conductivity of the polymer-matrix-based electrolyte was estimated according to the equation using impedance. Second, the chemical and electrochemical stabilities of the polymer-matrix-based electrolyte were estimated by the CV and GCD tests. The stabilities of the polymer-matrix-based electrolytes were demonstrated by controlling the voltage range tested by the CV. Third, the mechanical properties of the polymer-matrix-based electrolytes were evaluated by conducting tensile tests.
A coin cell was fabricated using PVA- and PVDF-HFP polymer-matrix-based electrolytes with AC symmetric cells. The supercapacitor performances of the two different coin cell supercapacitors were evaluated at 25 °C. Because this work mainly involves PVA- and PVDF-HFP polymer-matrix-based electrolytes, the remainder of this paper focuses on these electrolytes. The detailed procedures of these experiments, difficulties in execution, and insights gained from these experiments are described as below.
1. Synthesis of PVA- and PVDF-HFP polymer-matrix-based electrolytes
NOTE: When handling methanol, it is best to avoid direct exposure as much as possible.
2. Characterization of the GPEs
3. Preparation of the composite AC electrode
4. Coin cell preparation and testing
5. EIS, CV, and GCD testing methods for the PVA and PVDF-HFP GPEs
NOTE: The potentiostats consist of a working sensor (WS), a working electrode (WE), a reference electrode (RE), and a counter electrode (CE).
6. Stretchable gel testing
7. Stretchable gel deformation test
PVA was widely applied as a polymer-matrix-based electrolyte for SCs because it is biodegradable, inexpensive, chemically stable and non-toxic, has a wide operating temperature range, and has a transparent-film forming capability10,11. PVA enhances ionic conductivity due to its hydroxyl groups which absorb water12. In this study, we prepared the PVA-based gel electrolyte by mixing H3PO4/H2O, which served as a proton source. In gel electrolytes, H3PO4 generally provides free ions that act as charge carriers, and the solvent acts as a conductive medium that helps salt dissolution13. As shown in Figure 1A, there are three proton migration mechanisms: (1) Grotthuss or hopping mechanism, where the proton diffuses by forming and cleaving a hydrogen bond network14. (2) Diffusion mechanism, where the proton forms a complex with water molecules and its driving force is the proton concentration15. (3) Direct transfer mechanism, where protons can move freely through the polymer chains16.
PVDF-HFP-based GPEs have also been used to achieve high ionic conductivities at RT while maintaining long-cycle stability17. Furthermore, PVDF-HFP has a linear structure and high dielectric constant, which provides membrane flexibility and numerous charge carriers. Three additional polymers were used in this synthetic strategy (Figure 1B): poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDE), diamine poly(propylene oxide) (DPPO), and diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A (DEBA). DEBA was used as a supporting polymer to enhance the strength of the gel polymer network. DPPO and PEGDE were connected to the DEBA network18.
FTIR and XRD analyses were performed to determine the structural properties of the GPEs. The FTIR spectra of the pure PVA and PVA-based gel electrolyte films are shown in Figure 2A, which indicates that phosphoric acid and PVA interact with each other. The O-H and C-O stretching vibrations of the pure PVA and PVA-based gel electrolyte are significantly different. The peaks at 3293 and 1088 cm-1 correspond to the O-H and C-O stretching vibrations, respectively. The decrease in the peak intensity and red shift in the spectra indicate that PVA forms a network. These peaks confirmed the successful interaction between H3PO4 and PVA through the O-H and C-O groups. The FTIR spectrum of the PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolyte is shown in Figure 2B. The peaks at 1250, 380, 1610, and 1510 cm-1 are attributed to C-C stretching. The peak at 1110 cm-1 is ascribed to the C-O-C stretching bond, whereas the peak at 930 cm-1 corresponds to C-N bonding, which confirms that the reaction occurred.
XRD is a useful technique for studying the structural characteristics of gel electrolytes. Figure 2C shows the XRD patterns of the pure PVA and PVA-based gel electrolyte. These patterns confirm that the acid interacts with the polymer phases and changes the properties of the polymer. In the XRD pattern of pure PVA, the reflection plane (101) indicates a semicrystalline nature. The peak corresponding to the (110) phase is high because of the hydroxyl groups in the PVA side chains, which result in a high degree of hydrogen bonding. This peak broadened with the addition of H3PO4, indicating that the gel had an amorphous nature compared to the pure PVA film. The XRD patterns confirmed the formation of the H3PO4 and PVA complexes.
Figure 2D shows the XRD pattern of the PVDF-HFP-based GPE. The peaks at 2θ = 18.2°, 19.9°, and 38.9° correspond to the (100), (020), and (020) crystalline peaks, respectively19. Compared to the reference crystallinity data20, the crystallinity of the polymer is considerably lower. The intensities of the crystalline peaks are low and broad.
Next, we performed electrochemical tests to confirm the ionic conductivity, chemical stability, and electrochemical stability of the PVA- and PVDF-HFP polymer-matrix-based electrolytes. A coin cell was used to evaluate the electrochemical properties of the PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based GPEs. The supercapacitor design, components, and assembled structure are shown in Figure 3, where two stainless steel current collectors or AC electrodes were positioned at the ends to create sandwich-like batteries. Symmetric coin cells were used to measure the ionic conductivity and chemical stability. An ideal GPE has high ionic conductivity and chemical and electrochemical stabilities. The chemical stability of the gel polymer electrolyte was determined at 25 °C by CV, using a coin-cell setup (Figure 3). CV was performed to measure the electrochemical stability using the following coin cells: "SUS|| PVA-based GPE||SUS" and "SUS|| PVDF-HFP-based GPE||SUS". The CV of the PVA-based GPE was performed at 25 °C in the range 0-0.8 V, and that of the PVDF-HFP-based GPE was performed in the range 0-2.5 V at a scan rate of 1 mV/s. The operating voltage of the aqueous electrolyte was limited to 1.23 V, which is the electrolysis voltage of water21. Organic electrolytes have a higher electrochemical potential window (2.5-2.8 V)22 than aqueous electrolytes. Figure 4A,B demonstrates that the PVA and PVDF electrolytes were stable in the tested voltage range.
The ionic conductivities of the electrolytes were measured using EIS. The electrolyte membrane was cut into round disks and sandwiched between two stainless steel current collectors.
where L is the gel electrolyte film thickness or separating distance between the two electrodes, A is the contact area between the GPE and the AC electrodes or SUS plate, and Re is the GPE resistance, which can be estimated from the real part of the impedance at high frequency. As shown in Figure 5, the intercept of the real axis (Z' axis) indicates that Re is associated with the intrinsic resistance of the electrode material, ionic resistance of the GPE, and contact resistance at the interface. Figure 5A,B shows the Nyquist plots of the PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based electrolytes. Their ionic conductivities were calculated using ohmic resistance. The R values are listed in Table 1.
To evaluate the electrochemical stability of the gel polymer electrolytes, CV and GCD tests were performed using an AC symmetric coin cell. Figure 6A shows the CV curves of the PVA-based GPE SC at different scan rates ranging from 5 to 100 mV/s. The PVA-based GPE SC exhibits a potential window of 0.8 V and remains rectangular with increasing scanning rates of the CV loops. The CV curves of PVDF-HFP GPE are shown in Figure 6B. The test was conducted under the same conditions as those used for the PVA-based GPE. Next, we performed a GCD test. The GCD graphs (Figure 6C) demonstrate that both the PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolytes exhibited symmetrical curves, which are characteristic of an electric double layer capacitor. Cycling stability is an important parameter that reflects the electrochemical performance of the supercapacitor. To evaluate the cycling stability of the supercapacitor with the GPE, CV tests were conducted at a scan rate of 100 mV/s. The electrochemical stability of the AC electrode with the PVA-based gel electrolyte at a scan rate of 100 mV/s is shown in Figure 7A. It was observed that 98.6% of the original capacitance was retained after 1000 cycles, which is an acceptable cycle ability for the PVA-based gel electrolyte. As shown in Figure 7B, the AC electrode with the PVDF-HFP GPE retained 101% of its original capacitance after 1000 cycles. The performance of the supercapacitor improved as the electrodes were gradually wetted by the electrolyte23,24.
The mechanical properties of the PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolytes are shown in Figure 8. As shown in Figure 8A, the PVA-based gel electrolyte exhibited an elongation at break because of the phosphoric acid, which entangles the polymer chains. The tensile strength of the PVA gel electrolyte was 20.3 MPa with a maximum strain of 291.53%. As shown in Figure 8B, the tensile strength of the PVDF-HFP GPE was 2.2 MPa with a maximum strain of 32.07%. The deformation properties were investigated using loading-unloading tests. Figure 9A,B shows the loading-unloading curves of the PVA-and PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolytes, which exhibited a significant hysteresis loop in the first cycles. However, this effect became negligible as the loading-unloading processes were repeated.
Figure 1: Mechanism and synthesis of PVA- and PVDF-HFP polymer-matrix-based electrolyte. (A) A schematic illustration showing the proton conduction mechanism in PVA: 1) Grotthuss or hopping mechanism, 2) diffusion of the vehicle mechanism, and 3) decoupling of the proton from the segmental motion in the polymer electrolyte. (B) Schematic of the synthesis of the PVDF-HFP-based gel polymer electrolyte. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Structural characterizations of PVA- PVDF-HFP-based gel polymer electrolytes. FTIR spectra of (A) the PVA-based gel electrolyte and (B) the PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolyte. XRD patterns of (C) the pure PVA- and PVA-based gel electrolyte and (D) the PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolyte. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Schematic of the coin-cell assembly. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Chemical stability characterization data for PVA- and PVDF-HFP polymer-matrix-based electrolyte. CV curve of the optimized gel polymer electrolyte system at 0.1 mV/s scan rate for each cell, (A) SUS||PVA-based gel polymer electrolyte||SS and (B) SS||PVDF-HFP-based gel polymer electrolyte||SS. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Ionic conductivity measurements. Nyquist plots of (A) the PVA-based electrolyte and (B) the PVDF-HFP-based gel polymer electrolyte. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Electrochemical test. (A) CV curves of the PVA-based gel electrolyte based on AC symmetric electrodes at various scan rates. (B) CV curves of the PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolyte based on AC symmetric electrodes at various scan rates. (C) GCD curves of the PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolytes at 0.1 mA/cm2 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Cycling stability test. (A) AC symmetric electrode with the PVA-based gel polymer electrolyte cycling test at 100 mV s-1 for 1000 cycles. (B) AC symmetric electrode with the PVDF-HFP electrolyte cycling test at 100 mV·s-1 for 1000 cycles. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Stress-strain curves. (A) PVA- and (B) PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolytes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9: Loading-unloading cycle test (A) The PVA-based gel electrolyte. (B) The PVDF-HFP-based gel electrolyte. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Electrolyte type | The thickness of the electrolyte film (mm) | Bulk resistance of the electrolyte (ohm) | Ionic conductivity (mS/cm) |
PVA | 0.213 | 603.749 | 2.29 x 10-5 |
PVDF-HFP | 0.23 | 52.987 | 2.82 x 10-4 |
Table 1: Comparison of the ionic conductivities of PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based gel polymer electrolytes.
Our approach for developing stretchable SCs involved the synthesis of GPEs and their subsequent evaluation in prototypical coin cells. In particular, the PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based GPEs were tested in coin cells with symmetric AC electrodes or SUS plates. The critical steps in this approach include 1) preventing bubble generation during the preparation of GPEs, 2) developing a cell assembly procedure that accords with a working supercapacitor, and 3) setting an appropriate experimental range.
Polymer electrolytes should exhibit high ionic conductivity at ambient temperature25, high chemical and electrochemical stabilities26, good mechanical properties of dimensional stability27, and sufficient thin-film processability to be eligible for use in flexible supercapacitors. Achieving these characteristics in a gel electrolyte is challenging. To date, PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based electrolytes have been widely used to best implement these characteristics in supercapacitor electrolytes. In this protocol, the properties primarily determined in the gel electrolyte and a facile methodology to verify the same have been described.
Most polymerization processes are accompanied by the generation of bubbles. However, bubbles deteriorate the gel electrolyte performance, shorten the cycle life, and impact the physical properties of the materials28. These bubbles act as resistive elements inside the cell. Thus, the temperature should be increased in steps, and a vacuum must be maintained to create a uniform GPE without bubbles.
Several difficulties were encountered during the GPE SC assembly because of the high interfacial resistance between the GPE and electrode29. When testing a gel polymer electrolyte with an AC electrode, it was challenging to wet all the AC electrode pores. Therefore, the AC electrode was placed in the GPE solution and heated to 60 °C for 10 min to ensure complete wetting of the AC electrode. After this step, the interfacial resistance was minimized when the SC performance was tested.
Furthermore, the potential range for electrochemical tests was determined based on the electrochemical kinetics of the electrolytes. Aqueous electrolytes have a narrow potential range that is restricted by the decomposition of water. For example, with respect to 0 V ,the standard hydrogen electrode is the negative electrode, in which the hydrogen evolution reaction occurs; at 1.23 V, the positive electrode, the oxygen evolution reaction occurs30. To avoid gas evolution, the cell voltage of an aqueous electrolyte is usually restricted to approximately 1.0 V. In contrast, the organic electrolytes have a wide potential window, typically in the range of 2.5-2.8 V31.
The performance of the cell was accurately evaluated by first measuring the amount of current by CV and then performing GCD with that current. If the GCD is tested with a current higher than that obtained by CV, data validation becomes difficult owing to the large resistance.
Even though the safety and electrochemical tests on the PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based GPEs were easily tested in a coin cell with an AC electrode, determining the simultaneous performance changes in the physical properties of gel electrolytes and thereby predicting the performance of the flexible system were difficult. To solve this problem, tests must be conducted using electrode materials with a modulus similar to that of the GPE. Using this coin cell testing method, the electrochemical performance of the gel polymer was determined without any deformation.
In conclusion, we presented the preparation of PVA- and PVDF-HFP-based GPEs and assembled an AC symmetric coin cell SC. XRD and FTIR analyses were performed to confirm the structures of the GPEs. Ionic conductivity, chemical stability, electrochemical stability, and physical properties were measured. We expect that these validated experimental procedures will facilitate the study of GPEs for application in supercapacitors.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The research was supported by the Competency Development Program for Industry Specialists of the Korean MOTIE operated by KIAT (No. P0012453, Next-generation Display Expert Training Project for Innovation Process and Equipment, Materials Engineers), and the Chung-Ang University Research Scholarship Grants in 2021.
1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC=1/1, v/v | Sigma aldrich | 746738 | Electrolyte for pvdf-hfp polymer based gel electrolyte |
Activated carbon | Sigma aldrich | 902470 | Active material |
Ag/AgCl electrode | BASi | RE-5B | Reference electrode |
Carbon black | Sigma aldrich | 699632 | Conductive material |
Diamino-poly (propylene oxide) (DPPO) | Sigma aldrich | 80506-64-5 | corss linking material for pvdf-hfp polymer based gel electrolyte |
Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A (DEBA) | Sigma aldrich | 106100-55-4 | corss linking material for pvdf-hfp polymer based gel electrolyte |
Dimethylformamide (DMF) | Samchun | D0551 | |
Electrode pressing machine | Rotech | MP200 | |
Extractor | WonA Tech | Convert program (raw data to Excel ) | |
Isopropanol(IPA) | Samchun | I0346 | Solvent to melt the binder |
Phosphoric acid | Samchun | 00P4277 | |
poly (ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDE) | Sigma aldrich | 475696 | corss linking material for pvdf-hfp polymer based gel electrolyte |
Polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE) | Sigma aldrich | 430935 | Binder |
polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) | Sigma aldrich | 9002-89-5 | |
Polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP) | Sigma aldrich | 427160 | |
Potentiostat | WonA Tech | Zive SP1 | |
Pt electrode | BASi | MW-018122017 | Counter electrode |
Smart management 6(SM6) | WonA Tech | Program of setting sequence and measuring electrochemical result | |
Sulfuric acid | Samshun | S1423 | Electrolyte |
Tensile testing machine | Nanotech | NA-50K | tensile testing machine |
Zman | WonA Tech | EIS program |
.