A High-Throughput Screening Approach for Evaluating the Binding Affinity of Environmental Pollutants to Nuclear Receptors
Summary
This protocol describes a high-throughput screening system that uses fluorescence polarization of a specific fluorescent probe binding to a nuclear receptor as a readout for screening environmental pollutants.
Abstract
Increasing levels of compounds have been detected in the environment, causing widespread pollution and posing risks to human health. However, despite their high environmental occurrence, there is very limited information regarding their toxicological effects. It is urgent to develop high-throughput screening (HTS) methods to guide toxicological studies. In this study, a receptor-ligand binding assay using an HTS system was developed to determine the binding potency of environmental pollutants on nuclear receptors. The test is conducted using a microplate reader (i.e., a 96-well plate containing various chemicals) by measuring the fluorescence polarization (FP) of a specific fluorescent probe. This assay consists of four parts: the construction and transformation of recombinant vectors, the expression and purification of the receptor protein (ligand-binding domain), receptor-probe binding, and competitive binding of chemicals with the receptor. The binding potency of two environmental pollutants, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and triphenyl phosphate (TPHP), with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) was determined to illustrate the assay procedure. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of this method and its potential applications were also discussed.
Introduction
A large number of chemicals have been widely detected in the environment and human bodies, raising significant concerns about their impact on the ecological environment and human health1,2,3. Despite their high environmental occurrence, information regarding their toxicological effects is scarce. Therefore, it is urgent to develop high-throughput screening (HTS) methods to facilitate the assessment of chemical toxicity.
Several high-throughput screening (HTS) methods have been reported for chemical toxicity assessment, such as the HTS bioassays used in the Tox21 and ToxCast programs4,5. These methods can rapidly identify potential toxicants and provide valuable information on the mechanisms of chemical toxicity. However, these HTS bioassays mainly rely on cell-based systems, which can be complex and expensive. Additionally, high-throughput sequencing methods have also been used for chemical toxicity assessment, but achieving high-throughput evaluation of chemicals remains challenging6. Previous studies have developed fluorescence polarization (FP)-based receptor-ligand competitive binding assays to determine the binding potency of several environmental pollutants, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)7,8,9, bisphenol A (BPA)10,11, and particulate matter (PM)12, with nuclear receptors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)7,8,9,10,13, farnesoid X receptor (FXR)11,12, and thyroid receptor (TR)14,15. This approach is efficient, cost-effective, and provides mechanistic insights.
In this study, the protocol for the receptor-ligand binding assay is described based on detecting the fluorescence polarization (FP) of a small fluorescent probe. The principle of the FP-based receptor-ligand binding assay is illustrated in Figure 1. When a small fluorescent molecule is excited by plane-polarized light, the emitted light becomes highly depolarized due to rapid molecular rotation. However, when the tracer binds to a larger receptor, its rotation is slowed. A high FP value is detected when the tracer is bound to the large receptor, whereas a low FP value is observed when the tracer is free. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) was purified for the binding of the probe to the receptor. Rosiglitazone (Rosi), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) were used to compete for the binding of the probe with the receptor. Rosi, a specific agonist of PPARγ, was used as a positive control in the receptor competitive binding assays. Additionally, PFOS and TPHP have been previously identified as weak agonists of PPARγ in past studies8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Furthermore, they belong to different structural categories of compounds known for environmental exposure and are notable for their relatively high detection rates in human populations. These compounds were used to further validate the broad applicability of the competition binding assay. The procedure consists of four steps: construction and transformation of recombinant vectors, expression and purification of the receptor protein (ligand-binding domain), receptor-probe binding, and competitive binding of chemicals with the receptor.
Protocol
Representative Results
Discussion
Fluorescence polarization (FP), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) are common techniques used for assessing direct binding interactions between proteins and compounds19,20. FP has been widely employed in the investigation of molecular interactions for drug discovery and chemical screening21,22,23. In comparison, SPR and NMR assays are e…
Divulgazioni
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82103875).
Materials
| C1-BODIPY-C12 Probe | Thermo Fisher Scientific, China | 102209-82-3 | Binds to PPARγ-LBD and emits fluorescence. |
| Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 | Solarbio, China | 6104-59-2 | Stain the protein bands. |
| GraphPad prism | Dotmatics | https://www.graphpad.com/features | |
| imidazole | Solarbio, China | I8090 | Prepare buffers for the protein purification process. |
| Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside | Solarbio, China | 367-93-1 | Induce the expression of PPARγ-LBD |
| Microplate reader | Biotek , USA | Synergy H1 | Detecting FP value |
| NaCl | Shanghai Reagent | 7647-15-5 | Prepare buffers for the protein purification process. |
| NaH2PO4 · 2H2O | Shanghai Reagent | 13472-35-0 | Prepare buffers for the protein purification process. |
| Ni NTA Beads 6FF | Smart-Lifesciences, China | SA005005 | Protein purification. |
| Origin 8.5 | OriginLab, Northampton, MA, U.S.A. | ||
| Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) | J&K Scientific Ltd, China | 1763-23-1 | The detected environmental pollutants |
| Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) | Solarbio, China | P0100 | Inhibit protein degradation. |
| PPARγ-Competitor Assay Kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | PV6136 | https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/PV6136 |
| PPARγ-LBD Ligand Screening Assay Kit | Cayman | 600616 | https://www.caymanchem.com/product/600616 |
| Rosiglitazone (Rosi) | aladdin, China | 122320-73-4 | The agonists of PPARγ |
| Shaker | ZHICHENG, China | ZWY-211C | Bacterial culture expansion and induction of protein expression |
| Triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) | Macklin, China | T819317 | The detected environmental pollutants |
| Tris | Solarbio, China | T8230 | Prepare buffers for the protein purification process. |
| Tryptone | OXOID Limited, China | LP0042B | Prepare Lysogeny Broth (LB) medium. |
| Ultrasonic Cleaner | Kimberly, China | LHO-1 | Disrupt the bacteria to achieve complete lysis |
| Urea | Solarbio, China | U8020 | Prepare buffers for the protein purification process. |
| Yeast extract | OXOID Limited, China | LP0021B | Prepare Lysogeny Broth (LB) medium. |
Riferimenti
- Maddela, N. R., Ramakrishnan, B., Dueñas-Rivadeneira, A. A., Venkateswarlu, K., Megharaj, M. Chemicals/materials of emerging concern in farmlands: sources, crop uptake, and potential human health risks. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 24 (12), 2217-2236 (2022).
- Naidu, R., et al. Chemical pollution: A growing peril and potential catastrophic risk to humanity. Environ Int. 156, 106616 (2021).
- Ryu, H., Li, B., De Guise, S., McCutcheon, J., Lei, Y. Recent progress in the detection of emerging contaminants PFASs. J Hazard Mater. 408, 124437 (2021).
- Alofe, O., et al. Determining the endocrine disruption potential of industrial chemicals using an integrative approach: Public databases, in vitro exposure, and modeling receptor interactions. Environ Int. 131, 104969 (2019).
- Bajard, L., et al. Endocrine disrupting potential of replacement flame retardants – Review of current knowledge for nuclear receptors associated with reproductive outcomes. Environ Int. 153, 106550 (2021).
- Chen, Q., Chou, W. C., Lin, Z. Integration of toxicogenomics and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in human health risk assessment of perfluorooctane sulfonate. Environ Sci Technol. 56 (6), 3623-3633 (2022).
- Li, C. H., Ren, X. M., Cao, L. Y., Qin, W. P., Guo, L. H. Investigation of binding and activity of perfluoroalkyl substances to the human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 21 (11), 1908-1914 (2019).
- Li, C. H., et al. Chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonates exhibit higher activity toward peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors signaling pathways than perfluorooctanesulfonate. Environ Sci Technol. 52 (5), 3232-3239 (2018).
- Li, C. H., Shi, Y. L., Li, M., Guo, L. H., Cai, Y. Q. Receptor-bound perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids dictate their activity on human and mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. Environ Sci Technol. 54 (15), 9529-9536 (2020).
- Li, C. H., Zhang, D. H., Jiang, L. D., Qi, Y., Guo, L. H. Binding and activity of bisphenol analogues to human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 226, 112849 (2021).
- Zhang, D., et al. Binding activity and risk assessment of bisphenols toward farnesoid X receptor pathway: In vitro and in silico study. Sci Total Environ. 869, 161701 (2023).
- Zhang, D., et al. Fine particulate matter disrupts bile acid homeostasis in hepatocytes via binding to and activating farnesoid X receptor. Toxicology. 506, 153850 (2024).
- Li, C. H., Ren, X. M., Guo, L. H. Adipogenic activity of oligomeric hexafluoropropylene oxide (perfluorooctanoic acid alternative) through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ pathway. Environ Sci Technol. 53 (6), 3287-3295 (2019).
- Qin, W. P., Li, C. H., Guo, L. H., Ren, X. M., Zhang, J. Q. Binding and activity of polybrominated diphenyl ether sulfates to thyroid hormone transport proteins and nuclear receptors. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 21 (6), 950-956 (2019).
- Ren, X. M., Li, C. H., Zhang, J. Q., Guo, L. H. Binding and activity of sulfated metabolites of lower-chlorinated polychlorinated biphenyls towards thyroid hormone receptor alpha. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 180, 686-692 (2019).
- Evans, N., et al. In vitro activity of a panel of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), fatty acids, and pharmaceuticals in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha, PPAR gamma, and estrogen receptor assays. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 449, 116136 (2022).
- Kim, S., et al. Triphenyl phosphate is a selective PPARγ modulator that does not induce brite adipogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Arch Toxicol. 94 (9), 3087-3103 (2020).
- Matsumoto, H., Haniu, H., Komori, N. Determination of protein molecular weights on SDS-PAGE. Methods Mol Biol. 1855, 101-105 (2019).
- Nguyen, H. H., Park, J., Kang, S., Kim, M. Surface plasmon resonance: A versatile technique for biosensor applications. Sensors (Basel). 15 (5), 10481-10510 (2015).
- Hu, J., Kim, J., Hilty, C. Detection of protein-ligand interactions by 19F nuclear magnetic resonance using hyperpolarized water. J Phys Chem Lett. 13 (17), 3819-3823 (2022).
- LeBlanc, E. V., Shekhar-Guturja, T., Whitesell, L., Cowen, L. E. Fluorescence polarization-based measurement of protein-ligand interaction in fungal cell lysates. Curr Protoc. 1 (1), e17 (2021).
- Huang, X., Aulabaugh, A. Application of fluorescence polarization in HTS assays. Methods Mol Biol. 1439, 115-130 (2016).
- Seethala, R., et al. A rapid homogeneous fluorescence polarization binding assay for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma using a fluorescein-tagged dual PPARalpha/gamma activator. Anal Biochem. 363 (2), 263-274 (2007).
- Hu, W., et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and disruption of progesterone synthesis of 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate in human placental choriocarcinoma cells: Comparison with triphenyl phosphate. Environ Sci Technol. 51 (7), 4061-4068 (2017).
- Weatherman, R. V., Fletterick, R. J., Scanlan, T. S. Nuclear-receptor ligands and ligand-binding domains. Annu Rev Biochem. 68, 559-581 (1999).
- Khazaee, M., et al. Perfluoroalkyl acid binding with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α, γ, and δ and fatty acid binding proteins by equilibrium dialysis with a comparison of methods. Toxics. 9 (3), 45 (2021).
- de Vera, I. M. S., et al. Synergistic regulation of coregulator/nuclear receptor interaction by ligand and DNA. Structure. 25 (10), 1506-1518.e4 (2017).
- Hendrickson, O. D., Taranova, N. A., Zherdev, A. V., Dzantiev, B. B., Eremin, S. A. Fluorescence polarization-based bioassays: New horizons. Sensors (Basel). 20 (24), 7132 (2020).
- Liu, C., et al. Identification of a novel selective agonist of PPARγ with no promotion of adipogenesis and less inhibition of osteoblastogenesis. Sci Rep. 5, 9530 (2015).
.