The protocol describes a modification of the rapid Golgi method, which can be adapted to any part of the nervous system, for staining neurons in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex of the rat.
Golgi impregnation, using the Golgi staining kit with minor adaptations, is used to impregnate dendritic spines in the rat hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex. This technique is a marked improvement over previous methods of Golgi impregnation because the premixed chemicals are safer to use, neurons are consistently well impregnated, there is far less background debris, and for a given region, there are extremely small deviations in spine density between experiments. Moreover, brains can be accumulated after a certain point and kept frozen until further processing. Using this method any brain region of interest can be studied. Once stained and cover slipped, dendritic spine density is determined by counting the number of spines for a length of dendrite and expressed as spine density per 10 µm dendrite.
The method of using potassium dichromate and silver nitrate to label neurons was first described by Camillo Golgi1,2 and subsequently used by Santiago Ramon y Cajal to produce an immense body of work differentiating neuronal and glial subtypes. A recently published book with his illustrations is now available3. Following Ramon y Cajal's studies, which were published more than 100 years ago, very little Golgi impregnation was used. Golgi impregnation is a laborious process that allows three-dimensional visualization of neurons with a light microscope. There have been numerous modifications of the Golgi method over the years to make the method easier and the staining more consistent4. In 1984, Gabbott and Somogyi5 described the single section Golgi impregnation procedure which allowed for more rapid processing. This Golgi impregnation method requires perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde and 1.5% picric acid, post-fixation followed by vibratome sectioning into a bath of 3% potassium dichromate. Sections are mounted onto glass slides, the four corners of coverslips glued so that when immersed in silver nitrate, diffusion is gradual. Coverslips are then popped off, sections are dehydrated, and eventually cover slipped permanently with mounting medium. This technique was successfully used to label neurons and glia6,7,8 in the hippocampus. The rapid Golgi method described here is an improvement because there is far less exposure to both potassium dichromate and silver nitrate and no paraformaldehyde and picric acid are used. In addition, although cells that were impregnated using modifications of the Gabbott and Somogyi5 method could be analyzed, often the sections were over-or under-exposed or fell off the slides during the dehydration step and generally, several experiments had to be pooled to have enough cells for analysis.
The present protocol describes the use of the Golgi staining kit (see Table of materials) to label dendrites and dendritic spines in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of the rat. The advantages of this method over previous ones are that it is rapid, there is less exposure to noxious chemicals for the researcher and there is consistent staining of neurons. The protocol described below has been used with minor modifications to assess dendritic spine density in the hippocampus and mPFC of the rat in many studies9,10,11,12,13,14,15.
All experimental procedures are approved by the Sacred Heart University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and are in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Animals.
1. Isolation and infiltration of brain tissue
2. Sectioning of brain tissues
3. Staining and dehydration of brain tissue
4. Determination of dendritic spine density
Using the rapid Golgi method, cells are consistently well impregnated so that there are plenty of cells to analyze. This is a marked improvement over prior methods where experiments had to be pooled to have enough data for analysis. Therefore, more samples can be processed at once and brains can be stored frozen until processing. Examples of Golgi impregnated cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus are shown at low and high power in Figure 3. Counting of spines in a given region yields consistent results with small standard errors. This is also important because one can make comparisons between experiments. Figure 4 illustrates an experiment in which basal dendritic spine density was increased on pyramidal cells in adolescent male and female rats after environmental enrichment (EE) in both CA1 and the mPFC. Briefly, male and female rats were weaned at postnatal day (PND) 21 and assigned to control or enriched groups. The EE group spent 2 h/day in enriched housing from PND 24-42 while the control group was housed in ordinary cages during this time. EE induced, in adolescents of both sexes, an increase in basal dendritic spine density in both CA1 and the mPFC. Note the small standard error of the mean (SEM) in all the dendritic spine values.
Figure 1: Ventral surface of rat brain. Photograph of the ventral surface of a fresh rat brain indicating where to cut into anterior and posterior blocks before submerging blocks into initial solutions. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Typical Pyramidal Cell. Schematic of a pyramidal cell, illustrating apical and basal dendrites which are analyzed for dendritic spine density. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Golgi Impregnated Neuron. Examples of Golgi impregnated neurons in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus. Left: Several impregnated pyramidal cells. Scale bar = 25 µm. Upper right: Basal dendrites. Scale bar = 12.5 µm. Lower right: Example of a secondary basal dendrite. Arrows denote spines. Scale bar = 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Spine Density. A data set illustrating basal and apical dendritic spine density in the mPFC and CA1 region of the hippocampus (CA1) following environmental enrichment (EE) compared to control (CON) in male (M) and female rats (F). Histograms show the average number of spines/10 µm dendrite + SEM. Data were analyzed using statistical analysis software (see Table of materials). Two-way (sex X EE) ANOVAs were used to test for group differences and Fisher's LSD tests were used for post-hoc analysis. Significant effects are p<0.05. t denotes a significant difference. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The present protocol describes a method of Golgi impregnation that allows for rapid simultaneous processing of many sections. It is an improvement over previously described5 more labor-intensive methods and consistently yields impregnated neurons for analysis. In addition, there is less exposure to toxic chemicals used in Golgi impregnation. The most challenging part of the process is getting the sections to be flat on the slides, which takes considerable practice. Keeping everything as cold as possible with the use of freezing spray is essential.
Once slides are dry and analysis can be performed, it is very important to be consistent in selecting the cells that are counted. Hippocampal pyramidal cells are chosen from CA1. For the mPFC, which has several subparts, pyramidal cells from the infralimbic cortex are used. For reasons that are not clear, fewer cells in the mPFC are stained than in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. In addition, it is possible to combine experiments when all the sections cannot be processed together for logistical reasons. For consistency, the same person should count a given set of cells.
The limitations of this method are similar to all Golgi impregnation methods. The fact that only a small number of cells are stained is an advantage. The small number of cells impregnated allows for visualization of the entire cell in three dimensions. The disadvantage of the Golgi method is that it is not clear which subset of cells is labeled. Therefore, in experiments, one must assume that the cells impregnated for both control and experimental groups are the same. Even though this method results in far better staining than previous methods, there are always cells that cannot be analyzed because they are covered by debris, an air bubble, or have broken dendrites.
In conclusion, the rapid Golgi method described here is a fast, safe method for consistent and reproducible labeling of neurons that can be used for any brain region. In addition to labeling cells in the prefrontal cortex17,18 and hippocampus10,12,19, it has also been used in the amygdala20, cerebellum21, and cortex22. Assuming one is familiar with the anatomy and can quickly identify cells, hand counting of spine density can provide a quick result, but it does not provide information on dendritic subtypes which requires more sophisticated methods of analysis.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by Sacred Heart University Undergraduate Research InitiativeGrants.
Cardboard slides trays | Fisher Scientific | 12-587-10 | |
Coverslips 24 x 60mm | Fisher Scientific | 12-545-M | |
FD Rapid GolgiStain kit | FD Neurotechnologies | PK 401 | Stable at RT in the dark for months; Golgi staining kit |
Freezing Spray | Fisher Scientific | 23-022524 | |
HISTO-CLEAR | Fisher Scientific | 50-899-90147 | clearing agent |
NCSS Software | Kaysville, UT, USA | ||
Permount | Fisher Scientific | SP-15-100 | mounting medium |
Superfrost Plus Microscope slides | Fisher Scientific | 12-550-15 | |
Tissue Tek CTYO OCT Compound | Fisher Scientific | 14-373-65 | Used to mount brains on cryostat chuck |