We simulated clinical surgery to establish a protocol of direct anastomosis of bilateral brachial plexus nerves via the prespinal route in mice, contributing to the study of the neural mechanisms underlying rehabilitation upon crossing nerve transfer after central and peripheral nervous system injuries.
Crossing nerve transfer surgery has been a powerful approach for repairing injured upper extremities in patients with brachial plexus avulsion injuries. Recently, this surgery was creatively applied in the clinical treatment of brain injury and achieved substantial rehabilitation of the paralyzed arm. This functional recovery after the surgery suggests that peripheral sensorimotor intervention induces profound neuroplasticity to compensate for the loss of function after brain damage; however, the underlying neural mechanism is poorly understood. Therefore, an emergent clinical animal model is required. Here, we simulated clinical surgery to establish a protocol of direct anastomosis of bilateral brachial plexus nerves via the prespinal route in mice. Neuroanatomical, electrophysiological, and behavioral experiments helped identify that the transferred nerves of these mice successfully reinnervated the impaired forelimb and contributed to accelerating motor recovery after brain injury. Therefore, the mouse model revealed the neural mechanisms underlying rehabilitation upon crossing nerve transfer after central and peripheral nervous system injuries.
The brachial plexus (BP) consists of five nerves with different spinal segments (C5-T1) responsible for sensation and movement in the arm, hand, and fingers. After exit of these five BP nerves from the spinal cord, they merge to form three nerve trunks: the superior (formed by the merging of C5 and C6), medial (from C7), and inferior (branches of C8 and T1). Severe injuries, especially due to traffic accidents, often lead to avulsion of the BP nerve roots, and such dysfunction has a devastating effect on patients1. As a powerful clinical approach, crossing nerve transfer surgery has been performed to repair avulsion injuries to the BP by reconnecting the injured nerve ends to the healthy side of the BP2,3. This surgery results in functional improvements of injured hands and direct reorganization of the sensorimotor cortex in both hemispheres in patients4. Animal studies have revealed that drastic reorganization in the cortical circuits was induced after crossing nerve transfer5. Because peripheral sensorimotor modification can reactivate the dormant plasticity of the mature brain, crossing nerve transfer surgery also exhibits great potential in repairing brain injuries6.
Recently, we confirmed the possibility of the creative use of crossing nerve transfer as a new peripheral nerve change strategy for problems with the central nervous system. A type of crossing nerve transfer surgery, contralateral cervical seventh nerve transfer (CC7), was applied to achieve significant functional recovery of the paralyzed arm by transferring the C7 nerve from the nonparalyzed side to the paralyzed side in the patient after brain injury7. A unique feature of this surgical operation is that the sensory and motor signals of the paralyzed upper extremity communicated to the contralesional hemisphere through the "left-right crossover" displaced nerve. Notably, the functional recovery caused by CC7 surgery is not limited to the function innervated by the C7 nerve itself8. In addition, CC7 surgery can be used not only to treat children with cerebral palsy but also to achieve rehabilitation in middle-aged and elderly stroke patients. Therefore, there are sufficient reasons to believe that crossing nerve transfer can stimulate neuroplasticity to accelerate motor recovery from brain damage by modulating the peripheral sensorimotor system.
Although crossing nerve transfer surgery has achieved substantial rehabilitation in the clinical treatment of both brachial plexus injuries (BPI) and brain injuries, the neural mechanisms underlying this surgery remain poorly understood. The lack of a suitable animal model featuring clinical features has restricted the study of internal mechanisms. Traditionally, in the clinic, the C7 nerve root contralateral to the lesion is transferred to the injured side through a nerve graft (e.g., ulnar nerve, sural nerve, or saphenous nerve) and connected with the affected brachial plexus (e.g., median nerve, C7 root, or lower trunk)2,3,9. A relatively new modification of this surgery involves the unaffected C7 root being directly transferred to the affected C7 nerve via the prespinal route without any gap, suggesting an optimal solution7. Currently, mice exhibit an advantage in cell-type specificity and genetic strain diversity and are more suitable to study neurophysiological mechanisms. Hence, clinical surgery was simulated to establish a protocol for direct anastomosis of bilateral C7 nerve roots via the prespinal route in mice and contribute to the study of the neural mechanisms underlying rehabilitation upon crossing nerve transfer.
All the animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Care of Experimental Animals Committee of Fudan University and the Chinese Academy of Science in conformity with the National Institute of Health guidelines. Eight-week-old adult male C57BL/6N mice were used.
1. Preoperative setup
2. Mouse anesthesia and preparation
3. Operative procedure
4. Wound closure
5. Postoperative care
6. Behavioral analysis
NOTE: All behavioral testing and analysis were done by an observer blinded to the experimental groups.
Unilateral brain injury often causes permanent dysfunction of the contralateral limb due to the limitations of compensative neural plasticity in adults10,11. Previously, we reported that CC7 surgery could be used to treat hemiplegic upper limbs in adult patients after brain injury7. To evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol for direct anastomosis bilateral C7 nerves via the prespinal route, we performed the crossing nerve transfer surgery in mice following unilateral traumatic brain injury (TBI). Figure 1 describes the TBI procedures and verifies the damage range and effect. First, an electric cortical contusion impactor (eCCI) was used to damage the cerebral cortex of the left hemisphere (anteroposterior = +1.0 mm to -2.0 mm, mediolateral = 0.5 mm to 3.5 mm) in adult mice to result in unilateral brain injury. After 2 weeks, anatomical structures confirmed that this TBI protocol almost destroyed the sensorimotor cortex, an important location for initiating movements. These mice with unilateral TBI exhibited significant motor defects of the right forelimb.
Figure 2 describes the CC7 procedures. The path diagram of CC7 surgery revealed that path A, representing the prespinal route, was the shortest approach compared to the others. The length of path A is even lower than the length of the harvested C7 nerve on the left side (nonparalyzed side). This finding provided the anatomical basis for the choice of the prespinal route to complete nerve transfer surgery. CC7 surgery was performed in direct anastomosis via the prespinal route at two weeks post-TBI. The cervical 7 (C7) nerve on the nonparalyzed side was directly transferred to the paralyzed side instead of making its original brain connections. Figure 3 shows the results of electron microscopy that revealed that the transferred C7 nerve had successfully regenerated. The myelin sheath thickness of the transferred C7 nerve gradually increased, starting at 4 weeks post-CC7 surgery, and was almost comparable to that in the control group at 8 weeks post-CC7 surgery. Figure 4 identifies muscle reinnervation of the transferred C7 nerve using electromyographic recordings. Electrically stimulating the proximal end of C7 nerve anastomosis stably induced action potentials in multiple muscles of the affected forelimb at 4 weeks postoperatively, in agreement with the electron microscopy results. Figure 5 shows that the transferred C7 nerve contains motor fibers from the ventral horn and sensory fibers from the dorsal root ganglia of the spinal cord C7 segment on the healthy side through cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) retrograde labeling.
Figure 6 shows that the mouse model also exhibited significant motor recovery after unilateral TBI, consistent with the results of the clinical studies. To verify the effect of CC7 surgery on the recovery of injured motor function after TBI, a TBI + Sham group and a Control + Sham group were established. The mice in the TBI + Sham group and the TBI + CC7 group received the same procedures for TBI injury simultaneously, while the mice in the Control + Sham group received only sham surgery. While the mice in the TBI + CC7 group received nerve transfer surgery, mice in the TBI + sham group and the Control + Sham group underwent bilateral cervical 7 (C7) nerve resection. In cylinder tests, the TBI + CC7 group showed a significantly higher usage rate of the impaired forelimb than the TBI group at both 4 and 8 weeks post-CC7 surgery (p < 0.01). In grid-walking tests, the TBI + CC7 group showed a lower error rate than the TBI group at 4 weeks post-CC7 surgery. Moreover, the error rate of the TBI + CC7 group was significantly lower than that in the TBI group at 8 weeks post-CC7 surgery (p < 0.05). These behavioral results showed that CC7 surgery could improve the motor function of the affected limb in TBI mice. Together, these results suggest that the transferred C7 nerve rebuilt by CC7 surgery via the prespinal route was successfully regenerated and reinnervated the impaired forelimb, contributing to motor restoration in adult mice with unilateral TBI.
Figure 1: Characterization of unilateral traumatic brain injury. (A) Schematic showing the mouse position in eCCI. (B) The parameters and damage range of eCCI. (C) Representative coronal section showing the lesioned cortex (2 weeks after TBI, scale bar = 500 µm). Abbreviation: eCCI = electric cortical contusion impactor. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: The surgical elementary diagram. (A) Schematic diagram showing the experimental design for performing the contralateral C7 nerve transfer in TBI mice. The red circle shows the position of the trauma. The red double-slash within the dashed rectangle shows the sutured nerve. (B) A cross-section shows three alternative routes of the contralateral C7 nerve transfer in the mice. Path A, the blue line depicts the prespinal route of the transferred nerve; Path B, the green line, depicts the pretracheal route of the transferred nerve; Path C, the red line, depicts the subcutaneous tunnel of the transferred nerve. (C) The graph shows the length of the routes and the harvested C7 nerve in (B). The length of path A (3.3 ± 0.10 mm) was significantly lower than the length of the harvested C7 nerve (4.05 ± 0.11 mm; * p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, n = 20 in each group). The length of path C (14.15 ± 0.20 mm) was significantly greater than that of the harvested C7 nerve (*** p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA, n = 20 in each group). The length of path B was 4.2 ± 0.08 mm (n=20). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: The electron microscopy analysis of a cross-section of the nerve. (A,B) Images of the nerve in control mice. Scale bar = 5 µm (A) and 1 µm (B). (C,D) Images of the regenerated nerve one month after surgery. Scale bar = 5 µm (C) and 1 µm (D). (E, F) Images of the regenerated nerve at one point five months after surgery. Scale bar = 5 µm (E) and 1 µm (F). (G, H) Image of the regenerated nerve at two months after surgery. Scale bar = 5 µm (G) and 1 µm (H). Magnification of A, C, E, and G, 2,000x; magnification of B, D, F, and H, 15,000x. (I) The G-ratio (the ratio of the inner to the outer diameter of the myelin sheath) is lower in control group samples than in 4-weeks samples and equal to samples at 6-8 weeks post-surgery (***: p < 0.001; comparison at different group axons with t-test; n = 3 mice in each group). Abbreviations: CC7= contralateral cervical seventh nerve transfer; CC7-XW = X weeks post-surgery. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Electromyography analysis after the contralateral C7 nerve transfer indicates the rate of nerve regeneration. (A) Schematic diagram showing the electronic transfer stimulation and in vivo electromyography recording. The stimulation intensity was the same throughout the test (2 mA). The stimulation site is the C7 nerve proximal to the anastomosis. (B, C) Photographs showing action potential recorded at the pectoralis major at two weeks (B) and four weeks (C) after surgery. (D, E) EMG was recorded in extensor digitorum 4 weeks (D) and 8 weeks (E) post-surgery. (F) At three weeks, CMAPs emerged in the triceps brachii. (G) At four and eight weeks, CMAPs of triceps brachii increased. (H) The mean amplitude of pectoralis major reached ~0.25 mV ± 0.16 mV at 4 weeks versus 0.45 mV ± 0.03 mV at 8 weeks, showing a significant difference between the two time points (*** p < 0.001, t-test, n = 6 in each group). (I) The mean amplitude of triceps brachii reached ~0.15 mV ± 0.01 mV at 4 weeks versus 0.46 mV ± 0.02 mV at 8 weeks, showing a significant difference between the two time points (***: p < 0.001, t-test, n = 6 in each group). (J) The mean amplitude of extensor digitorum reached ~0.11 mV ± 0.01 mV at 4 weeks versus 0.29 mV ± 0.02 mV at 8 weeks, showing a significant difference between the two time points (***: p < 0.001, t-test, n = 6 in each group). Abbreviations: EMG = electromyography; CMAP = compound muscle action potential. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: CTB retrograde labeling of motor and sensory neurons of the transferred C7 nerve. (A–C) CTB was injected at the distal end of the C7 nerve anastomosis at 4 weeks post CC7 surgery. (A)The sensory neurons were labeled for the DRG. (B, C) The motor neurons of the transferred C7 nerve were labeled for the spinal anterior horn. Magnification, 20x. Scale bar = 200 µm (A, B); 100 µm (C). Abbreviations: CTB = cholera toxin subunit B; DRG = dorsal root ganglion; DAPI = 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Behavioral changes after CC7 surgery. (A) The images show the cylinder test of the mice. (B) Summary graph showing the effect of CC7 transfer at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after surgery on the TBI mice (n = 6 mice). p = 0.001; unpaired t-test. The average usage of the impaired forelimb was 54.17% ± 3.01% in Control + Sham group versus 22.5% ± 2.14% in TBI + Sham group; 35.83% ± 2.39% in TBI + CC7 group at 4 weeks post-CC7 surgery, indicating a significant difference (one way ANOVA; p < 0.05, n = 6 in each group). At 8 weeks after CC7 transfer, the usage was 53.33% ± 3.80%, 24.17% ± 3.01%, and 40.00% ± 1.83% in Control + Sham group, TBI + Sham group, and TBI + CC7 groups, respectively, a significant difference (*p < 0.05, one way ANOVA, n = 6 in each group). (C) The images display the grid walk test. (D) The graph shows that the mean error rates of the impaired forelimb in TBI + Sham group were 85.41% ± 1.59% (n = 6) equaling to the TBI + CC7 group 80.17% ± 2.19% (n = 6), and both were more than the Control + Sham group (50.99% ± 11.69%). At 8 weeks after surgery, the error rate in TBI + CC7 group was 76.87 ± 1.07% (n = 6), which is significantly lower than that of the TBI + Sham group (83.06% ± 1.41%; p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, n = 6 in each group). Abbreviations: CC7= contralateral cervical seventh nerve transfer; TBI = traumatic brain injury. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In the clinic, crossing nerve transfer surgery has been used to treat patients with brachial plexus avulsion injury and after brain damage, such as stroke and TBI7,9,12. Notably, brain damage is a severe neurological condition that can lead to several complications, including epilepsy, cerebral hernia, and infection13. Not all patients with unilateral brain injury are suitable for CC7 surgery. In general, CC7 surgery has been performed in patients with central hemiplegia at the chronic stage (6 months post injury) to avoid the influence of brain edema as much as possible. Patients with cognitive impairment and quadriplegia after brain injuries are excluded from treatment for CC7 surgery.
Most studies have reported using a subcutaneous approach and sural or ulnar nerve graft anastomosis to transfer the contralateral C7 nerve root14,15. However, nerve regeneration by such methods requires six months, which can hinder the motor recovery process and even potentially influence brain plasticity14. In previous studies, contralateral C7 transfer was performed in rats, and the bilateral C7 nerve was used via 4 strands of the interpositional autografted sural nerve. However, there have been no reports of C7 nerve transfer via the prespinal route in mice. We performed CC7 surgery of the modified prespinal route in mice and verified the velocity of functional recovery after C7 nerve transfer. In this study, contralateral C7 nerve transfer via the prespinal route improved paralyzed limb function one month after surgery, reflecting a shorter recovery time of the nerve grafted animal model. Therefore, this model could precisely simulate clinical situations and lay the foundation for further experiments.
How to dissect the nerve root and reduce risk are essential issues for C7 transfer. Unlike in humans, the brachial plexus of the mouse is located in the chest below the clavicle5,16. Therefore, the access strategy had to be altered to allow for the observation of the root of the C7 nerve and spine17. Sternotomy is a safe and effective operative approach and is commonly applied in mouse experiments in cardiothoracic surgery18,19. The C6 lamina ventrali is also an obstacle to transferring nerves. Thus, sternotomy surgery was performed to dissect the C7 nerve root and sever the C6 lamina ventrali to shorten the transfer distance.
Although the prespinal route can significantly increase the success rate of direct anastomosis of nerve transfer surgery, not all mice can be anastomosed directly. This is mainly due to the anatomical differences in these mice. The middle trunk (C7 nerve) merges with the upper or lower trunk at a location very close to the intervertebral foramen. Thus, the length of the C7 nerves available for harvesting is insufficient. Currently, the only approach is nerve transplantation or replacement of mice. This model is typically employed in 8-week-old mice (20-25 g), as the mice are mature and C7 nerves are of adequate size to be handled. Although this surgical protocol is also applicable to young mice, the difficulty of the operation will increase significantly in younger mice.
The forelimb motor function of mice in the TBI + CC7 group was significantly increased at one month and two months, suggesting that the transferred C7 nerve contributed to the recovery of the impaired forelimb. Remyelination is critical for functional neural recovery. A previous study showed that the myelin sheaths of injured nerves regenerated after one month, consistent with these results20. Here, the transferred nerve gradually matured, which was consistent with the behavioral test. Electromyography was used to further test the rate of functional recovery after nerve transfer. The results demonstrated that the transferred nerve innervated the affected muscle 4 weeks after the operation. Notably, this study is the first to determine the time point of reinnervation with a direct anastomosis after crossing nerve transfer surgery.
In summary, we simulated clinical surgery to establish a protocol for direct anastomosis of bilateral brachial plexus nerves via the prespinal route in mice and confirmed the function of the displaced nerve. The mouse model contributed to the elucidation of the neural mechanisms underlying rehabilitation upon crossing nerve transfer after central and peripheral nervous system injuries.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071406, 81902296, and 81873766).
1 mL syringe | KDL | K-20200808 | |
12-0 nylon sutures | Chenghe | 20082 | |
5-0 silk braided | MERSILK,ETHICON | QK312 | |
75% ethanol | GENERAL-REAGENT | P1762077 | |
Acupuncture needle | Chengzhen | 190420 | Use for making retractors |
Automatic clipper | Codos | CHC-332 | |
C57BL/6N mice | SLAC laboratory (Shanghai) | C57BL/6Slac | |
Electrocautery | Gutta Cutter | SD-GG01 | |
Erythromycin ointment | Baiyunshan | H1007 | |
Iodophor disinfection solution | Lionser | 20190220 | |
Medical tape | Transpore,3M | 1527C-0 | |
Micro needle holder | Chenghe | X006-202003 | |
Micro-forceps | Chenghe | B001-201908 | |
Micro-scissors | 66VT | 1911-2S276 | |
Operating microscope | OLYMPUS | SZX7 | |
Ophthalmic scissor | Chenghe | X041D1251 | |
Pentobarbital sodium | Sigma | 20170608 | |
Plastic infusion tube | KDL | C-20191225 | |
Sterile normal saline | KL | L121021109 | |
Vascular forceps | Jinzhong | J31020 | |
Warming pad | RWD | 69027 |