Summary

Optimized High Quality DNA Extraction from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Human Atherosclerotic Lesions

Published: February 12, 2021
doi:

Summary

Here, we present a protocol for semi-automated DNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lesions of human carotid arteries. The tissue lysis is performed without toxic xylene, which is followed by an automated DNA extraction protocol, including a second lysis step, binding of DNA to paramagnetic particles for cellulose based binding, washing steps, and DNA elution.

Abstract

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues represent a valuable source for molecular analyses and clinical genomic studies. These tissues are often poor in cells or difficult to process. Therefore, nucleic acids need to be carefully isolated. In recent years, various methods for DNA isolation have been established for tissues from many diseases, mostly cancer. Unfortunately, genomic DNA extracted from FFPE tissues is highly degraded due to the cross-linking between nucleic acid strands and proteins, as well as random breakings in sequence. Therefore, DNA quality from these samples is markedly reduced, making it a challenge for further molecular downstream analyses. Other problems with difficult tissues are, for example, the lack of cells in calcified human atherosclerotic lesions and fatty tissue, small skin biopsies, and consequently low availability of the desired nucleic acids as it is also the case in old or fixed tissues.

In our laboratories, we have established a method for DNA extraction from formalin-fixed atherosclerotic lesions, using a semi-automated isolation system. We compared this method to other commercially available extraction protocols and focused on further downstream analyses. Purity and concentration of the DNA were measured by spectrometry and fluorometry. The degree of fragmentation and overall quality were assessed.

The highest DNA quantity and quality was obtained with the modified blood DNA protocol for the automated extraction system, instead of the commercial FFPE protocol. With this step-by-step protocol, DNA yields from FFPE samples were in average four times higher and fewer specimens failed the extraction process, which is critical when dealing with small-vessel biopsies. Amplicon sizes from 200–800 bp could be detected by PCR. This study shows that although DNA obtained from our FFPE tissue is highly fragmented, it can still be used for successful amplification and sequencing of shorter products. In conclusion, in our hands, the automated technology appears to be the best system for DNA extraction, especially for small FFPE tissue specimen.

Introduction

Formalin fixation followed by paraffin embedding (FFPE) is a standard procedure for long-term preservation of pathological specimen in biobanking1. These samples provide a valuable source for histological studies as well as molecular analyses, especially genetic studies2. Further advantages of FFPE tissues are better long-term storage, lower costs, and easier storage conditions. Our intention here is to provide a reliable and easy-to-use protocol for reproducible nucleic acid isolation from small amounts of FFPE sections, since high quality DNA extraction is the first crucial step in a wide range of molecular techniques and FFPE tissues are the most available source of samples.

New scientific approaches, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and “omics” research approaches, require high quality of nucleic acids3,4,5. Extracting DNA from FFPE tissue samples remains a challenging endeavor. DNA from FFPE samples can vary widely in quality and quantity depending upon its age and fixation conditions. Formalin, the most frequently used compound, leads to DNA-protein crosslinking6,7,8 and causes unspecific random breakage in the nucleotide sequence9. This may significantly impact downstream genomic analyses, since crosslinking can disable polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification6,10. Due to contaminants during the fixation process, purity of the DNA isolated from FFPE samples is often limited. In recent years, various methods for DNA isolation were established, mostly from cancer tissue specimens2,11,12,13.

In general, protocols for the extraction of nucleic acids from FFPE tissue can be differentiated into three main groups. The first, most commonly used group of methods includes commercially available silica-based column systems14. The second group involves manual organic phase extraction methods with phenol and chloroform, first described by Joseph Sambrook and David W. Russell15. As a third group, automated systems were established over the last years such as liquid handling systems as well as paramagnetic particle-based systems16. Each of the three named systems holds different advantages and disadvantages such as hazardous chemicals (i.e., xylene, phenol, chloroform), high costs17, manpower18, and time consumption19. Especially, for the difficult tissue specimen as well as high throughput analyses standardization, reproducibility, relatively low time-consumption, manpower, and costs are the most relevant features in finding a suitable method for nucleic acid isolation20. Automated extraction methods are known to show better reproducible results and are more sensitive for small biopsies. Moreover, less amount of tissue or blood is needed and the risk of clogging of the system due to high amounts of paraffin is reduced. Although machines for automated nucleic acid extraction and the needed kits are more expensive compared to manual methods, they are still convincing due to less problematic extraction processes. Literature search provides a lot of publications that illustrate a direct comparison between manual, column-based, and automated DNA and RNA extraction methods from different tissues and organisms, such as plants, animals, and humans as well as cells in culture20,21,22. There are also evidences present in literature to show that DNA and RNA isolated from 10-year old snap frozen tissue can be used for downstream analyses such as PCR, quantitative PCR, NGS, methylation analyses, and cloning9,23,24,25,26.

The major problem with, for example, aged human vascular tissue, as well as small tissue biopsies, especially concerning FFPE samples, is the lack of cells in the highly calcified atherosclerotic lesions, which consequently leads to low concentrations of nucleic acids1. Although several methods for DNA extraction from FFPE tissue have already been established and are widely used, the manual sample preparation methods require long hands-on time27 and toxic reagents such as xylene or phenol are necessary for deparaffinization2. As described, the deparaffinization process is a crucial time-consuming step (e.g., around 30 min) that markedly affects the quality and quantity of the extracted DNA (e.g., toxic effects on DNA, such as fragmentation and degradation of deparaffinization solution and high temperatures)28. Recently developed new DNA extraction protocols focus on using other non-toxic deparaffinization solutions, repair strategies and automated bead technologies. In particular, automated and semi-automated methods have been shown to be successful in DNA extraction with efficient recovery, lack of cross contamination, and easy performance29. We have established a protocol that overcomes these limitations. As a result, our technique allows a reduction of processing and hands-on time at highest quantitative and qualitative standards.

Especially for reproducible high-throughput analyses such as genotyping, epigenomic studies, and RNA sequencing the handling of FFPE specimen with column-based purification systems is often difficult and time consuming (e.g., long deparaffinization steps, column clogging, and long hands-on times). Clogging of the silica membranes due to high amount of paraffin is the major issue. Other circumstances that can worsen the isolation of high-quality nucleic acids are small amounts of tissue such as micro-biopsies of skin, small mouse tissue, very fatty or calcified tissue as plaques, ossified tissue, and aged samples. Especially in diagnosis and forensics, automated and semi-automated systems such as liquid handling or paramagnetic particle-based extraction methods became more and more essential over the last few years30,31, mainly due to relatively low hands-on times and the possibility of standardization. Most of the already published protocols work perfectly for smooth tissues with high or medium amounts of cells such as tumor biopsies or plant tissue13,22,32. Literature about methods for semi-automated particle-based methods used for isolating DNA from relatively hard-to-handle tissue such as fixed single cells, calcified vessels, collagen rich tissue, and fatty tissue with low cell numbers are only poorly described33.

In this study, an optimized semi-automated method for DNA isolation from vascular paraffin embedded sections is described, comparing it to two manual column-based protocols. DNA quantity, purity, and the extent of fragmentation were used for validation. The commercially available blood DNA protocol, was used as a starting point and the manual steps of the semi-automated system were subsequently optimized for the use of FFPE as well as fresh frozen tissue samples from human and animal tissue, combining steps from the FFPE and the tissue protocol. The automated step of this protocol is pre-installed on the instrument and depends on the used kit (here, the blood DNA kit). With the described semi-automated cartridge-based system it is possible to isolate DNA from blood, fresh-frozen tissue, formalin-fixed tissue and even single cells with the same protocol, machine, kit and consumables, instead of using different protocols and kits for the instrument, as it is recommended by the company. There are only minor differences in the protocols, such as one buffer and some incubation times for the different applications, which makes this protocol very useful for extracting DNA from all kinds of tissues. Our protocol is primarily optimized for calcified, poor in cells and fibrous human vascular tissue, but can of course be used and further optimized for all kinds of difficult tissues mentioned above.

Summarized, for researchers in the cardiovascular field working on atherosclerosis (e.g., aorta, carotid arteries, coronary arteries) we provide an easy-to-use, point-by-point protocol for semi-automated DNA extraction from vascular FFPE samples.

Protocol

The permission to collect human carotid atherosclerotic specimens in our biobank was approved by the local Hospital Ethics Committee (2799/10, Ethikkommission der Fakultät für Medizin der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Experiments were performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. 1. Tissue preparation Prepare 5–8 tissue sections of 10 µm from th…

Representative Results

For the establishment of the protocol, 5 FFPE tissue blocks from patients with atherosclerosis of the carotid artery were used. DNA was isolated with an optimized semi-automated protocol (kit C) as well as with two commercially available manual column-based protocols (kit A and kit B, see Table of Materials). DNA extraction with kit A and B was performed according to the manufacturer´s protocol. The only change that was made in the protocol of the two commercially available kits (kit A and kit B): d…

Discussion

DNA extraction methods for FFPE tissue vary in quality and quantity of isolated DNA, which inevitably affects the performance of further downstream analyses. Thus, automation is becoming imperative to improve workflow and standardization, as well as quality management. Therefore, in the present study, a semi-automated method for DNA extraction from FFPE samples was evaluated demonstrating better results than the other tested manual column-based protocols.

To optimize the described semi-automat…

Divulgazioni

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The establishment of the protocol for automated DNA extraction was supported by Dr. Paul Muschler from the Promega company. We thank Paul Muschler for his support and scientific contribution. We also thank our colleague Dr. Moritz von Scheidt (German Heart Center Munich) for providing us with the Maxwell instrument and for supporting the experimental part. All experiments were performed in the laboratories of German Heart Centre (Munich, Germany) and Klinikum rechts der Isar (Munich, Germany). The research was funded by DFG (PE 900/6-1).

Materials

1.5 ml tubes for sample incubation Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany 30120086
1-Thioglycerol Promega, Walldorf, Germany A208
Agilent tape station software 3.2 Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany
dsDNA HS Kit ThermoFisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany Q32851
FFPE DNA Purification Kits (Kit A) Norgene Biotek, Heidelberg, Germany 47400
FFPE tissue samples n=5 Munich Vascular Biobank,Munich, Germany
GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit (Kit B) Qiagen, Hilden, Germany 180134
Heating blocks, set to 80°C and 65°C VWR,Darmstadt,Germany 460-0250
High Sensitivity D5000 reagents Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany 5067-5593
High Sensitivity D5000 ScreenTape Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany 5067-5592
Incubation Buffer Promega, Walldorf, Germany D920
Maxwell Blood Kit RSC including: Lysis Buffer, Elution Buffer, Proteinase K Promega, Walldorf, Germany AS1400
Maxwell RSC 48 Instrument Promega, Walldorf, Germany AS8500
Microcentrifuge Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
NanoDrop 2000c Spectrometer ThermoFisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany ND-2000C
Optical caps Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany 401425
Optical tube strips Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany 401428
Pipettors and pipette tips Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Prism 6 for statistics, version 6.01 GraphPad Inc., San Diego, California
Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer ThermoFisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany Q33216
TapeStation 4200 Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany
Tecan Infinite M200 Pro Tecan, Männedorf, Swizerland IN-MNANO

Riferimenti

  1. Pelisek, J., et al. Biobanking: objectives, requirements, and future challenges-experiences from the munich vascular biobank. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 8 (2), 251 (2019).
  2. Goelz, S. E., Hamilton, S. R., Vogelstein, B. Purification of DNA from formaldehyde fixed and paraffin embedded human tissue. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 130 (1), 118-126 (1985).
  3. Busch, A., Eken, S. M., Maegdefessel, L. Prospective and therapeutic screening value of non-coding RNA as biomarkers in cardiovascular disease. Annals of Translational Medicine. 4 (12), (2016).
  4. Kandpal, R. P., Saviola, B., Felton, J. The era of ‘omics unlimited. BioTechniques. 46 (5), 351-355 (2009).
  5. McDonough, S. J., et al. Use of FFPE-derived DNA in next generation sequencing: DNA extraction methods. PloS One. 14 (4), (2019).
  6. Gilbert, M. T. P., et al. The isolation of nucleic acids from fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues-which methods are useful when. PloS One. 2 (6), (2007).
  7. Williams, C., et al. A high frequency of sequence alterations is due to formalin fixation of archival specimens. The American Journal of Pathology. 155 (5), 1467-1471 (1999).
  8. Solomon, M. J., Varshavsky, A. Formaldehyde-mediated DNA-protein crosslinking: a probe for in vivo chromatin structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 82 (19), 6470-6474 (1985).
  9. Gillio-Tos, A., et al. Efficient DNA extraction from 25-year-old paraffin-embedded tissues: study of 365 samples. Pathology. 39 (3), 345-348 (2007).
  10. Srinivasan, M., Sedmak, D., Jewell, S. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. The American Journal of Pathology. 161 (6), 1961-1971 (2002).
  11. van Eijk, R., Stevens, L., Morreau, H., van Wezel, T. Assessment of a fully automated high-throughput DNA extraction method from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue for KRAS, and BRAF somatic mutation analysis. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 94 (1), 121-125 (2013).
  12. Sarnecka, A. K., et al. DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples–a comparison of three procedures. Contemporary Oncology. 23 (1), 52 (2019).
  13. Kalmár, A., et al. Comparison of automated and manual DNA isolation methods for DNA methylation analysis of biopsy, fresh frozen, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer samples. Journal of Laboratory Automation. 20 (6), 642-651 (2015).
  14. McCormick, S. F. . Multilevel adaptive methods for partial differential equations. (SIAM). , (1989).
  15. Sambrook, J., Russell, D. W. Purification of nucleic acids by extraction with phenol: chloroform. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2006 (1), 4455 (2006).
  16. Berensmeier, S. Magnetic particles for the separation and purification of nucleic acids. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 73 (3), 495-504 (2006).
  17. Petrigh, R. S., Fugassa, M. H. DNA extraction and a cost-effective detection method for Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces. Veterinary Parasitology. 198 (3-4), 410-413 (2013).
  18. Lee, J. H., Park, Y., Choi, J. R., Lee, E. K., Kim, H. S. Comparisons of three automated systems for genomic DNA extraction in a clinical diagnostic laboratory. Yonsei Medical Journal. 51 (1), 104-110 (2010).
  19. Rohland, N., Siedel, H., Hofreiter, M. A rapid column-based ancient DNA extraction method for increased sample throughput. Molecular Ecology Resources. 10 (4), 677-683 (2010).
  20. Gutiérrez-López, R., Martínez-de la Puente, J., Gangoso, L., Soriguer, R. C., Figuerola, J. Comparison of manual and semi-automatic DNA extraction protocols for the barcoding characterization of hematophagous louse flies (Diptera: Hippoboscidae). Journal of Vector Ecology: Journal of the Society for Vector Ecology. 40 (1), 11-15 (2015).
  21. Seiler, C., et al. Nucleic acid extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cancer cell line samples: a trade off between quantity and quality. BMC Clinical Pathology. 16 (1), 17 (2016).
  22. Harada, S. . Sample Preparation Techniques for Soil, Plant, and Animal Samples. , 125-138 (2016).
  23. Haile, S., et al. Automated high throughput nucleic acid purification from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples for next generation sequence analysis. PloS One. 12 (6), 0178706 (2017).
  24. Fujii, T., et al. Evaluation of DNA and RNA quality from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for next-generation sequencing-Retrospective study in Japanese single institution. Pathology International. , (2020).
  25. Ludyga, N., et al. Nucleic acids from long-term preserved FFPE tissues are suitable for downstream analyses. Virchows Archiv: An International Journal of Pathology. 460 (2), 131-140 (2012).
  26. Niland, E. E., McGuire, A., Cox, M. H., Sandusky, G. E. High quality DNA obtained with an automated DNA extraction method with 70+ year old formalin-fixed celloidin-embedded (FFCE) blocks from the indiana medical history museum. American Journal of Translational Research. 4 (2), 198 (2012).
  27. Riemann, K., et al. Comparison of manual and automated nucleic acid extraction from whole-blood samples. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 21 (4), 244-248 (2007).
  28. Steinau, M., Patel, S. S., Unger, E. R. Efficient DNA extraction for HPV genotyping in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 13 (4), 377-381 (2011).
  29. Dundas, N., Leos, N. K., Mitui, M., Revell, P., Rogers, B. B. Comparison of automated nucleic acid extraction methods with manual extraction. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 10 (4), 311-316 (2008).
  30. Okello, J. B., et al. Comparison of methods in the recovery of nucleic acids from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded autopsy tissues. Analytical Biochemistry. 400 (1), 110-117 (2010).
  31. Witt, S., Neumann, J., Zierdt, H., Gébel, G., Röscheisen, C. Establishing a novel automated magnetic bead-based method for the extraction of DNA from a variety of forensic samples. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 6 (5), 539-547 (2012).
  32. Ivanova, N. V., Fazekas, A. J., Hebert, P. D. Semi-automated, membrane-based protocol for DNA isolation from plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 26 (3), 186 (2008).
  33. Sengüven, B., Baris, E., Oygur, T., Berktas, M. Comparison of methods for the extraction of DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissues. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 11 (5), 494 (2014).
  34. Miller, S. A., Dykes, D. D., Polesky, H. F. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Research. 16 (3), 1215 (1988).
  35. Wilfinger, W. W., Mackey, K., Chomczynski, P. Effect of pH and ionic strength on the spectrophotometric assessment of nucleic acid purity. BioTechniques. 22 (3), 474-481 (1997).
  36. Khokhar, S. K., Mitui, M., Leos, N. K., Rogers, B. B., Park, J. Y. Evaluation of Maxwell 16 for automated DNA extraction from whole blood and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 50 (2), 267-272 (2012).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Citazione di questo articolo
Bauer, S., Pauli, J., Pelisek, J. Optimized High Quality DNA Extraction from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Human Atherosclerotic Lesions. J. Vis. Exp. (168), e61452, doi:10.3791/61452 (2021).

View Video