Here, we present the molecular characterization of dystrophin 38 expression using Sanger sequencing, RT-PCR, and western blotting in the clinical trial.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a degenerative muscle disease that causes progressive loss of muscle mass, leading to premature death. The mutations often cause a distorted reading frame and premature stop codons, resulting in an almost total lack of dystrophin protein. The reading frame can be corrected using antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) that induce exon skipping. The morpholino AON viltolarsen (code name: NS-065/NCNP-01) has been shown to induce exon 53 skipping, restoring the reading frame for patients with exon 52 deletions. We recently administered NS-065/NCNP-01 intravenously to DMD patients in an exploratory investigator-initiated, first-in-human trial of NS-065/NCNP-01. In this methods article, we present the molecular characterization of dystrophin expression using Sanger sequencing, RT-PCR, and western blotting in the clinical trial. The characterization of dystrophin expression was fundamental in the study for showing the efficacy since no functional outcome tests were performed.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a degenerative muscle disease causing progressive loss of muscle mass, respiratory failure, and cardiomyopathy, and it leads to premature death1. The disease is caused by a lack of the large structural muscle protein dystrophin2. Mutations in the DMD-gene on the X-chromosome are recessive, and the disease affects 1 in 3500-5000 new-born males3,4,5. The mutations are often large deletions in a hotspot region between exons 44 and 55 that lead to a distorted reading frame and premature stop codons, causing nonsense-mediated decay and an almost total lack of dystrophin protein6,7,8. The reading frame can be corrected using antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) that induce exon skipping and restore the reading frame, partially restoring dystrophin expression and delaying disease progression9,10,11. The morpholino AON eteplirsen, which was recently approved by the Federal Drug Agency (FDA), induces skipping of exon 51 and can restore the reading frame in patients with exon 52 deletions12,13. However, exon 53 skipping restores the reading frame for patients with exon 52 deletions, and it can potentially treat approximately 10% of DMD patients14. The morpholino AON drug NS-065/NCNP-01 has been shown to induce exon 53 skipping in human cells, and we recently administered NS-065/NCNP-01 to DMD patients in a phase 1 open-label dose-escalation clinical trial (hereinafter, referred to as "the study") (registered as UMIN: 000010964 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02081625)14. The study showed a dose-dependent increase of exon 53 skipping based on RT-PCR and dystrophin protein levels based on western blotting, and no severe adverse drug events or dropouts were observed14.
In all clinical trials, the analysis of the results are of paramount importance. For DMD clinical trials, a debate is still ongoing regarding the best method to show a treatment benefit. Clinical tests such as the 6-minute walk test have certain drawbacks. Molecular characterization of the dystrophin expression can be performed using several methods, such as RT-PCR, qPCR, digital-PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry. However, the extent of protein expression restoration that is required to impart a clinical benefit remains unclear. In this methods article, we describe in detail the RT-PCR and western blotting methods used to determine the exon skipping and protein levels, respectively, in the phase 1 trial of the AON skipping drug NS-065/NCNP-0114.
The operational procedure for the investigator-initiated trial has been approved by the NCNP ethical committee (approval ID: A2013-019).
1. Preparation of muscle samples
NOTE: Biceps brachii or quadriceps muscles are often selected as biopsy sites. However, the tibialis anterior was used in the clinical trial.
2. Muscle sample preparation
3. Muscle sectioning
4. RNA extraction and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
5. Microchip electrophoresis and exon skipping calculation
NOTE: A microchip electrophoresis (MCE) system is often selected to analyze exon skipping efficiency. In this protocol, we describe the steps necessary to analyze the exon skipping efficiency using a MCE system by manufacturer A as well as from manufacturer B, hereafter called system A and B. During the clinical trial, the exon skipping efficiency was analyzed on system A. However, system A is no longer for sale, and we recommend system B to analyze exon skipping efficiency. We have included protocols for both systems (see section 5.1 for system A and 5.2 for system B). See Table of Materials for information regarding system A and B. Furthermore, this step can also be performed with normal agarose gel electrophoresis, but the sensitivity markedly decreases.
6. Complementary DNA (cDNA) sequencing
7. Western blotting
To use RT-PCR to detect exon skipping, primers on either side of the exon that will be skipped were designed and evaluated to yield only specific bands (see Figure 2 for a schematic diagram of exon skipping and primer position). The primers should generate products that can easily be distinguished by size on a MCE system or normal agarose gel electrophoresis if MCE is not available. Figure 3a shows MCE system A gel images of RT-PCR reactions and the sequencing results of the skipped band from patients NS-03 and NS-07 before and after treatment with NS-065/NCNP-01 in the dose-escalation phase 1 trial. NS-03 and NS-07 harbor deletions that span exons 45-52 and 48-52, respectively. NS-03 received 5 mg/kg and NS-07 20 mg/kg of NS-065/NCNP-01 weekly for 12 weeks. As expected before treatment, both patients showed no skipping, and only a non-skipped band could be visualized. After 12 weeks of treatment, a clear skipped lower band was visualised for NS-07. However, it was still difficult to detect any skipped product for patient NS-03. The sequencing results showed a concatenation of exons 47 and 54 for NS-07, as well as exons 44 and 54 for NS-03. According to the sequence, these could theoretically produce a functional but shortened dystrophin isoform. To calculate the skipping percentage shown in Figure 3b, the molar concentration for the skipped band was divided by the skipped and un-skipped band. For patient NS-07, the percentage after treatment was 72%, and it was 3.4% for NS-03. Western blot data (in triplicate) from patients NS-03, NS-07, and a healthy control are shown in Figure 4a. Expectedly, no dystrophin band was detected before treatment. After treatment a band from patient NS-07 was detected with a lower molecular weight compared to healthy control (wild type dystrophin has a molecular weight of 427 kDa, and NS-07 dystrophin has a molecular weight of 389 kDa). Because of the exon deletion and skipping, the dystrophin isoform from patient NS-07 lacked several exons, and it was expected to have a lower molecular weight. Patient NS-03 showed no detectable levels of dystrophin after treatment. In Figure 4b, the amount of dystrophin compared to a healthy control for patient NS-07 is shown. The location where signal intensities were measured for the calculation of dystrophin restoration are indicated with blue squares. The dystrophin spectrin ratio was used to calculate the amount of dystrophin compared to that of the healthy control. To this end, the signal from the dystrophin minus background was divided by the sum of the two spectrin isoforms (long and short) minus background (see step 8.6.5). The ratio for healthy control was set to 100%. The amount of dystrophin compared to the healthy control in patient NS-07 after treatment was 9.1%. However, the percentage could not be calculated for patient NS-03 due to a weak dystrophin band, which similar to those obtained for prior treatment samples for both patients.
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the transfer stack for western blot analysis. Assembly of the western blot transfer stack with blotting paper soaked in blotting buffer A in the bottom followed by blotting paper soaked in blotting buffer B, PVDF membrane, the 3-8% Tris-Acetate Gel and on the top 2 blotting papers soaked in blotting buffer C is shown. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Schematic drawing of exon skipping of exon 53 in a patient with exon 45-52 deletion in the DMD gene. For example, patient NS-03 in the dose-escalation clinical trial had this deletion. If exon 53 is retained, the mRNA will be out of frame since the exon-exon junction between exon 44 and 53 disrupts the reading frame, causing a stop codon in exon 53. The reading frame is restored when exon 53 is skipped, and a shorter isoform of dystrophin is produced. To detect exon 53-skipping by RT-PCR, primers in exon 44 and 54 are used so that the PCR-product between skipped and un-skipped mRNA can easily be detected. FWD: forward primer, REV: reverse primer, PMO: phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Skipping efficiency for patients NS-03 and NS-07 from tibialis anterior muscle biopsy samples. a) Gel image generated by electrophoresis system A of RT-PCR samples of untreated and treated samples from patients NS-03 and NS-07. Upper panel shows NS-03 and lower panel NS-07 in triplicate. For NS-03, the un-skipped band is 422 bp, and the skipped band is 212 bp. For NS-07, the bands are 836 bp and 624 bp, respectively. Sequence analysis showed a concatenation of exon 44 and exon 54 for NS-03 and exon 47 to exon 54 for NS-07. b) Skipping efficiency before and after treatment is shown for patients NS-03 and NS-07, calculated from the molar concentration of the two bands provided by system A as skipped band/(skipped band + un-skipped band) x 100. The skipping efficiency for NS-03 was very low after treatment; for NS-07, the skipping efficiency was over 70%. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Protein quantification of Dystrophin isoforms before and after exon skipping therapy. a) Protein quantification of dystrophin isoforms before and after exon skipping therapy. Western blot of muscle biopsy from tibialis anterior from patients NS-03 and NS-07 before and after treatment and from healthy control in triplicate. Dystrophin can be seen at 427 kDa for the healthy control and at 389 kDa for NS-07 after treatment. No dystrophin could be detected for either patient before treatment, or neither could any be detected after treatment for patient NS-03. The area in the black box is shown in Figure 4b. To the left in each blot the marker is shown. b) The amount of dystrophin restored after treatment for patient NS-07. Dystrophin restoration was calculated based on the intensities of the bands for dystrophin, background, and the long and short isoform of spectrin according to the formula: (dystrophin – background)/(spectrin L -background) + (spectrin S – background) where the ratio for healthy control is set to 100%. The intensity of each band was measured inside the blue boxes shown in the figure. The dystrophin restoration for NS-07 was 9.1% after treatment. The dystrophin signal was too weak to measure in the untreated samples. Marker sizes are shown in kilodaltons. Dys: Dystrophin, BG: background, SL: Spectrin long isoform, SS: Spectrin short isoform, My: Myosin type 1. Marker sizes are shown in kilodaltons. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Solution | Volume/Reaction (μl) | Final concentration |
RNase-free water (provided) | Variable | – |
5x QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR Buffer | 5.0 | 1x |
dNTP Mix (containing 10 mM of each dNTP) | 1.0 | 400 μM of each dNTP |
Forward Primer (10 μM) | 1.5 | 0.6 μM |
Reverse Primer (10 μM) | 1.5 | 0.6 μM |
QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR Enzyme Mix | 1.0 | – |
RNase inhibitor (optional) | Variable | 5–10 units/reaction |
Template RNA | 50 ng | |
Total | 25 |
Table 1: RT-PCR reagents. The necessary compounds for one reaction of the RT-PCR.
Primer | Sequence |
44F | 5'-CCTGAGAATTGGGAACATGC-3' |
46F | 5'-AACCTGGAAAAGAGCAGCAA-3' |
48F | 5'-CCAAGAAGGACCATTTGACG-3' |
54/55R | 5'-TCTCGCTCACTCACCCTTTT-3' |
54R | 5'-GTGGACTTTTCTGGTATCAT-3' |
Table 2: Primer list. Sequences for the primers used in this study. F: Forward, R: Reverse.
1 cycle | Reverse transcription | 30 min | 50 °C |
1 cycle | Initial PCR activation step | 15 min | 95 °C |
35 cycles | Denaturation | 1 min | 94 °C |
Annealing | 1 min | 60 °C | |
Extension | 1 min | 72 °C | |
1 cycle | Final extension | 7 min | 72 °C |
Hold | ∞ | 4 °C |
Table 3: PCR conditioned used. Show PCR conditions for the RT-PCR reaction.
Solution | Volume/Reaction (μl) |
RNase-free water | Variable |
BigDye Terminator 3.1 Ready Reaction Mix | 3.5 |
Forward Primer/Reverse Primer (3.2 μM) | 2.0 |
Template RNA | 20 ng |
Total | 20 |
Table 4: Reagents necessary for the sequencing reaction. Use either Forward or Reverse primer in the setup, not both at the same time.
1 cycle | 1 min | 96 °C |
25 cycles | 10 s | 96 °C |
5 s | 50 °C | |
4 min | 60 °C | |
Hold | ∞ | 4 °C |
Table 5: PCR conditions for the Sanger sequencing.
Clinical trials of DMD have produced both successes and failures in the last few years. Both RT-PCR and western blotting are common techniques to assess the skipping efficiency generated by exon-skipping compounds administered to the patients. However, RT-PCR has been reported to over-estimate the skipping efficiency compared to digital PCR15. Although this is due to a number of reasons, it is primarily caused by the more efficient amplification of the smaller skipped fragments during PCR cycles. It appears that RT-PCR used in this clinical trial also generated higher skipping efficiencies compared to the protein expression estimated by western blotting. According to the FDA, this is a more reliable way to quantify dystrophin restoration12. Hence, caution should be exercised when interpreting RT-PCR skipping results; however the samples can still be compared. Samples showing higher skipping efficiencies based on RT-PCR results commonly exhbit higher protein expression levels in western blot analyses.
Since all patients in DMD clinical trials do not have the same deletion pattern, it can be difficult to design primers and probes that are adequately specific to perform digital or qPCR on all samples. Hence, RT-PCR is still a good alternative for a first assessment of the skipping efficiency. Before the clinical trial of NS-065/NCNP-01 commenced, it was tedious to assess skipping efficiency for each patient in vitro since either a muscle or skin biopsy was mandatory to generate patient-specific myoblasts. However, we have recently published a novel technique to generate patient-specific MYOD1-converted, urine-derived cells (UDCs) as a novel DMD muscle cell model16. Thus, only urine collected from the patient is required to generate the myoblasts, and no invasive procedure is necessary. We believe that this method can be used to screen different AONs in patient-specific cells. Furthermore, different primers and probes can be tested before the patient starts any clinical trial. This can facilitate the use of qPCR or digital PCR for exon skipping measurement in DMD clinical trials in the future.
For performing western blot analysis in this clinical trial, a single antibody against dystrophin was used, and only one healthy control was used as a reference sample. Hence, the specificity of the antibody was not validated appropriately. This, together with the fact that the antibody only recognises the C-terminal domain of dystrophin, is a limitation of the protocol. More healthy controls and antibodies directed against different domains of the dystrophin molecule are advisable in the future.
Here, we summarized the protocols that were used in the recent exploratory investigator-initiated, first-in-human trial of NS-065/NCNP-01. NS-065/NCNP-01 is potentially applicable to 10.1% of patients with DMD.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We are grateful to Dr Takashi Saito, Dr Tetsuya Nagata, Mr Satoshi Masuda, and Dr Eri Takeshita for scientific discussion.
100 bp DNA Ladder | Takara | 3407A | marker solution for MultiNA |
1mol/l-Tris-HCl Buffer Solution(pH 7.6) | Nacalai | 35436-01 | |
2-mercaptoethanol | Nacalai | 21418-42 | |
2-Methylbutane (Isopentane) | Sigma-Aldrich | 15-2220 | |
5 mL Round Bottom Polystyrene Test Tube | Falcon | 352235 | |
6× Loading Buffer | Takara | 9156 | |
Agarose ME | Iwai chemical | 50013R | |
Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer | Applied Biosystems | A41046 | |
BD Matrigel Matrix | BD Biosciences | 356234 | |
BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit | Applied Biosystems | 4337455 | |
Bovine Serum Albumin solution | Sigma-Aldrich | A8412 | |
Bromophenol blue | Nacalai | 05808-61 | |
Centri-Sep 96-Well Plates | Applied Biosystems | 4367819 | |
cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail | Roche | 4693116001 | |
DMEM/F-12 | Gibco | 11320033 | |
ECL Prime Blocking Reagent | GE healthcare | RPN418 | |
ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent | GE healthcare | RPN2232 | |
Endo-Porter | GeneTools | 2922498000 | |
Experion Automated Electrophoresis Station | Bio-Rad | 7007010 | Microchip electrophoresis system A |
Experion DNA 1K Analysis Kit for 10 Chips | Bio-Rad | 7007107JA | |
Experion Priming Station | Bio-Rad | 7007030 | |
Experion Vortex Station II | Bio-Rad | 7007043 | |
Extra Thick Blot Filter Paper | Bio-Rad | 1703965 | |
EzBlot | Atto | AE-1460 | |
GelRed Nucleic Acid Gel Stain | Biotium | 41003 | |
glass vial | Iwaki | 1880 SV20 | |
Glycerol | Nacalai | 17045-65 | |
Histofine Simple Stain MAX PO | Nichirei | 424151 | |
Horse Serum | Gibco | 16050122 | |
Immobilon-P Transfer Membrane | Millipore | IPVH304F0 | |
ITS Liquid Media Supplement | Sigma-Aldrich | I3146 | |
Methanol | Sigma-Aldrich | 34860 | |
MicroAmp Clear Adhesive Film | Applied Biosystems | 4306311 | |
MultiNA | SHIMADZU | MCE-202 | Microchip electrophoresis system B |
Multiplate 96-Well PCR Plates | Bio-Rad | mlp9601 | |
NanoDrop One Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer with Wi-Fi | Thermo Scientific | ND-ONE-W | |
NovocastraTM Lyophilized Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Dystrophin (C-terminus) | Leica biosystems | NCL-DYS2 | |
NovocastraTM Lyophilized Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Spectrin | Leica biosystems | NCL-SPEC1 | |
NuPAGE 3-8% Tris-Acetate Protein Gels | Invitrogen | EA03785BOX | |
NuPAGE Antioxidant | Invitrogen | NP0005 | |
NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer | Invitrogen | NP0007 | |
NuPAGE Sample Reducing Agent | Invitrogen | NP0009 | |
NuPAGE Tris-Acetate SDS Running Buffer | Invitrogen | LA0041 | |
Oriole Fluorescent Gel Stain | Bio-Rad | 1610496 | |
PBS | Gibco | 10010023 | |
Penicillin-Streptomycin Solution Stabilized | Sigma-Aldrich | P4458 | |
Physcotron Handy micro-homogenizer | MICROTEC | NS-310E3 | |
Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit | Thermo Scientific | 23227 | |
Polybrene Infection / Transfection Reagent | Sigma-Aldrich | TR-1003 | |
Propidium Iodide Staining Solution | BD Pharmingen | 556463 | |
QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR Kit | Qiagen | 210212 | |
RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit | Qiagen | 74704 | |
SDS | Nacalai | 31606-75 | |
Semi-dry transfer machine | Bio Craft | 41-1293 | |
SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Gel Stain | Invitrogen | S11494 | for MultiNA |
TAE Buffer | Nacalai | 35430-61 | |
Tragacanth Gum | Wako | 200-02245 | |
Tris-EDTA Buffer | Nippon Gene | 316-90025 | for MultiNA |
Trypsin-EDTA (0.05%) | Gibco | 25300054 | |
TWEEN 20 | Sigma-Aldrich | P9416 | |
Urea | Nacalai | 35907-15 | |
Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System | Promega | A9281 | |
XCell SureLock Mini-Cell | Invitrogen | EI0001 |