Signal-flow graphs offer a streamlined and intuitive approach to representing control systems, providing an alternative to traditional block diagrams. These graphs use branches to symbolize systems and nodes to represent signals, effectively illustrating the relationships and interactions within the system.
In a signal-flow graph, branches denote the system's transfer functions, while nodes represent the signals. The direction of signal flow is indicated by arrows, with the corresponding transfer function written adjacent to each arrow. Unlike block diagrams, where summing junctions include negative signs to denote subtraction, signal-flow graphs incorporate these negative signs directly into the transfer functions.
The first step in converting a block diagram into a signal-flow graph is to identify the system signals. These signals are then represented as nodes in the signal-flow graph. Identifying and drawing the first nodes for each signal in the system is crucial in this conversion process. Then, connect these nodes with branches that represent the system's transfer functions, ensuring the direction of signal flow is accurately depicted.
For example, in a block diagram with multiple feedback loops:
The final step in converting block diagrams to signal-flow graphs involves simplifying the graph. This simplification is achieved by eliminating intermediate signals that have only one incoming and one outgoing branch, reducing the complexity of the graph and making it easier to analyze.
Once the signal-flow graph is established, Mason's rule can be applied to calculate the system's transfer function. This involves:
By converting block diagrams to signal-flow graphs, control systems can be analyzed more efficiently, leveraging the systematic approach provided by Mason's rule to determine transfer functions.