Here we introduce a standardized procedure for endotracheal intubation via tracheotomy followed by thoracotomy in rats, aimed at enhancing the precision and reproducibility of non-survival applications requiring invasive ventilation and exposure of thoracic organs in in vivo rat models.
Endotracheal intubation and subsequent ventilation are often basic requirements for translational research in rat models for various interventions that require controlled or high ventilation pressures or access to the thoracic cavity and organs. Conventional endoorotracheal intubation using the anatomically existing route through the mouth is well suited for survival experiments. However, this procedure poses some challenges, including generally higher levels of the required experience and technical skill, more advanced equipment, and greater time effort with relevant intubation failure rates and complications such as tracheal perforation, temporary systemic hypooxygenation, and relevant aerial leakage.
This manuscript, therefore, presents a detailed step-by-step protocol for endotracheal intubation through tracheotomy in non-survival rat models when guaranteed intubation success, constant oxygenation levels, high ventilation pressures, or open thoracotomy are required.
The protocol emphasizes the importance of meticulous surgical technique to ensure consistent and reliable outcomes, especially for researchers who are inexperienced or lack routine in the technique of endoorotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy. This procedure is, therefore, expected to minimize animal suffering and unnecessary animal losses.
In general, rodents are able to compensate for respiratory distress for much longer than patients would. They can remain cardiocirculatory stable and sufficient under spontaneous ventilation for much longer and during more invasive procedures, e.g., even through liver transplantation, which is known to be one of the procedures most stressful for cardiopulmonary circulation1,2,3.
However, endotracheal intubation is a basic requirement for translational research in rat models for various settings and interventions originating from a variety of biomedical fields and is essential in today's scientific landscape4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. While the majority of experimental laboratory animal work performed in rats in general still does not require invasive ventilation12, there are certain experimental setups that require intubation and controlled ventilatory assistance. These experimental setups include any experiment requiring a secured airway, high ventilation pressures, and laparoscopy or direct access to the thoracic cavity and organs.
Especially in the case of required access to the thoracic cavity and organs, endotracheal intubation is imperative as the collapse of the lung will result in a fatal respiratory insufficiency once the negative pressure in the intrapleural space and the inspiration mechanism by the intercostal muscles and the diaphragm are lost13.
While there are many publications on methods for non-invasive endoorotracheal intubation in rodents14,15,16,17, there seems to be a lack of procedure protocols for invasive endotracheal intubation by tracheotomy. Despite the invasiveness of the latter, which only allows for application in non-survival animal models, there are great advantages of intubation via tracheotomy. These include a steeper learning curve, higher and more persistent success rates, less required technical equipment, and improved success monitoring opportunities18,19.
Intubation success is essential for outcome. While various false intubations, as well as repeated intubation attempts in patients, are clearly associated with adverse events and complications as serious as death20,21, such events are also deleterious in test animals. In the best case, they represent a strong confounder variable in the experiment, but they can also lead to the unnecessary loss of the animal. Therefore, it makes sense to increase intubation success rates at the cost of non-invasiveness if the experimental setup and strategy allow it.
This standardized protocol of intubation via surgical tracheotomy offers several advantages, including reduced variability in intubation success rates, minimized effects on the cardiorespiratory physiology parameters, and full investigational control and manipulation of parameters. It aids in providing a secured airway, especially for inexperienced researchers in the procedure of endotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy, and allows researchers to conduct non-survival studies with highly controlled conditions. We highlight key anatomical landmarks and provide insights into troubleshooting common challenges encountered during the procedure.
In the US alone, about 110 million rats and mice are used in animal experiments per year24. While no reliable statistics can be found, a relevant percentage of these will receive supported ventilation, especially in the fields of pulmonary and cardiac research as well as anesthesiology. Most of these animals receive non-invasive endoorotracheal intubation, which entails a number of challenges. These include slower learning curves, higher rates of intubation failure, greater numbers of reintubations, and associated respiratory complications as well as respiratory leakages25. Non-invasive intubation will, therefore, generally take more experienced research staff, more advanced technology such as fiber optics, capnometry, and mechanical ventilators, and greater financial and materialistic resources26. The whole aspect of intubation is, therefore, a meaningful confounder relevant in subsequent statistical analysis and interindividual heterogeneity of results. However, non-invasive endoorotracheal intubation is often the only feasible option in longitudinal experiment designs.
Alternatives are tracheostomy for required long-term tracheal access in longitudinal experiments or surgical tracheotomy for “single-use” in non-survival experiments. While protocols on the microsurgical technique for tracheostomy in rats are available27, there are currently no protocols for endotracheal intubation via tracheotomy in non-survival rat models.
The herein-described standardized procedure for endotracheal intubation via tracheotomy and subsequent thoracotomy in rats, therefore, represents a valuable method for researchers engaged in non-survival studies. This procedure requires neither expert personnel nor extensive training. It has an intubation success rate that is much higher than endoorotracheal intubation and allows for much more controlled procedural steps.
Limitations of the presented techniques mainly include the invasiveness of the procedure and, consecutively, the exclusive compatibility with non-survival experiments. Due to the large defects in skin and soft tissue, as well as the incisional tracheal fistula, extubation and recovery from this procedure are neither feasible nor recommended, especially when combined with thoracotomy.
When troubleshooting common challenges encountered during the procedure, we would like to draw attention to the following points and recommendations: one should prepare equipment and medication as extensively as possible. The experimenter should perform hemostatic control meticulously by fine preparation and using non-traumatic cotton swabs. The experimenter should prepare the trachea over a length of at least 0.5 cm in order to allow for sufficient mobility and use the silicone vessel loop in order to not lose the trachea after incision, as this can result in aspiration and suffocation when the trachea is lost in the tissue depth due to backdrop phenomenon. Only partially incise the trachea with one clear stroke of the scissors. Ideally, one should incise 180° of circumference. Below this might result in failure to intubate. Above this might result in snapping of the trachea with retraction of both ends into the depth of the tissue and subsequent suffocation. When tying the polyfilament suture to secure the intubation tube, a sliding knot should be used in order to ensure sufficient tightness to avoid air leakage or accidental tube dislocation while at the same time avoiding unintended closure of the tube. Leaving the Seldinger wire in place during suturing can avoid unintended closure. When performing manual ventilation using the ventilation bag, one should strictly avoid barotrauma of the lung by high-tidal volumes. Instead, one should rather aim for lung-protective, high-frequent, and low-tidal ventilation, especially as long as thoracotomy has not been performed and the lung volumes cannot be evaluated visually.
By offering a detailed and reproducible methodology, this protocol facilitates the standardization of experimental procedures, improving data reliability and comparability across studies. As a result, this method contributes to the refinement of scientific techniques in preclinical research, ultimately enhancing the translational relevance of findings in the fields of physiology, pharmacology, surgical and biomedical sciences.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the data storage service SDS@hd supported by the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg (MWK) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) through grant INST 35/1314-1 FUGG and INST 35/1503-1 FUGG. Furthermore, the authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the NCT (National Center for Tumor Diseases in Heidelberg, Germany) through its structured postdoc program and the Surgical Oncology program. We also acknowledge the support through state funds approved by the State Parliament of Baden-Württemberg for the Innovation Campus Health + Life Science Alliance Heidelberg Mannheim from the structured postdoc program for Alexander Studier-Fischer: Artificial Intelligence in Health (AIH) – A collaboration of DKFZ, EMBL, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg University Hospital, University Hospital Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, and the Max Planck Institute for Medical Research. Furthermore, we acknowledge the support through the DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim. For the publication fee, we acknowledge financial support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the funding program "Open Access Publikationskoste" as well as by Heidelberg University.
Ambu Spur II Single-Use ventilation bag for neonates | Meier Medizintechnik | 335 102 000 | Ventilation bag |
BD Microlance 3 cannula 20 G | BD (Beckton, Dickinson) | 301300 | Cannula |
BD Microlance Discardit II 20 mL Syringe | BD (Beckton, Dickinson) | 300296 | Plastic syringe |
Fixation rods | Legefirm | 500343896 | Tuning forks used as y-shaped metal fixation rods |
Heat-shrinking tube | Sekesoer | RSG-400 | Heat-shrinking tube |
Intravenous catheter | BD (Beckton, Dickinson) | 393230 | BD Venflon Pro Safety intravenous catheter 14 G; shortened using scissors; alternatively 16 G or 18 G can be used |
Plastic perfusor tube | M. Schilling GmbH | S702NC150 | Connecting tube COEX 150 cm |
Polyfilament suture | COVIDIEN | CL331 | Polyfilament surgical suture recommended with a strength of 1 to 2; needle can be removed |
Royal Gardineer Heating Pad Size S, 20 Watt | Royal Gardineer | IP67 | Heating pad |
Seldinger guide wire | VYGON | 115.798 | Metal guide wire from the arterial leadercath set |
Silicone vessel loop tie | SERAG WIESSNER | SL26 | Silicone vessel loop tie 2.5 mm red |
Spraque Dawley rats | Janvier Labs | Male rats weighing 400 grams | |
Steel plate | Maschinenbau Feld GmbH | C010206 | Galvanized sheet plate, 40 x 50 cm, thickness 4.0 mm |
.