This paper presents a method that uses spinal cord stimulation with a multicolumn lead to treat neuropathic low back pain in failed back surgery patients.
Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) refers to persistent, chronic pain following spinal surgery. Spinal cord stimulation with dorsal epidural leads can be used to treat back and leg pain in FBSS patients. This paper presents a detailed protocol for using spinal cord stimulation with surgical leads in FBSS patients. In our department, with the patient under general anesthesia, we place the lead in the epidural space by means of a small laminectomy at the 10th thoracic level. Placement of the lead is followed by a 1 month trial period with an externalized lead. If pain relief is greater than 50% at the end of this 1 month stimulation trial (required by Belgian reimbursement criteria), an internal pulse generator is then placed under the skin and connected to the lead in a second surgical procedure. We have demonstrated that using this technique in rigorously selected FBSS patients can significantly improve back pain, leg pain, patient activity, and quality of life for a sustained period of time.
Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) refers to persistent, chronic pain following spinal surgery. Before FBSS can be established, other conditions, such as persistent nerve root compression, permanent nerve root injury as a consequence of the original compression or surgery, arachnoiditis, incorrect initial diagnoses, and documented mechanical causes for low back pain (such as spinal instability, posterior joint osteoarthritis, spondylolysthesis, and discogenic pain), should be excluded1,2,3. FBSS patients may have severe or disabling neuropathic pain, and the syndrome is worrisome since it is chronic and resistant to conventional treatment. Its incidence and prevalence are similar to those of rheumatoid arthritis4. It is thus a great burden for industrialized societies5.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with dorsal epidural leads can be used to treat back pain (BP) and leg pain (LP) in FBSS patients, although the SCS pain relief mechanism has not been fully investigated. According to the gate control theory, which was first proposed by Ronald Melzack and Patrick Wall in 1965, the brain monitors the activity of a tiny neural network distributed along the dorsal horn of the spinal cord that is regulated by nociceptive but also non-nociceptive afferents6. These complex circuits in the superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord are responsible for relieving pain in a specific location in the body when an intense tactile stimulus is applied to the same place7,8. However, several studies have shown that SCS is not only dependent on this theory. Several neurotransmitters (acetylcholine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and serotonin) have been reported to have a role in the SCS mechanism9,10,11,12, as well as numerous brain areas13,14 and different spinal fibers15.
An SCS device includes an epidural lead, internal pulse generator (IPG), and an extension cable to connect the lead to the IPG. The stimulation settings are adjusted by an external remote control. Two types of electrode can be used, namely, percutaneous and surgical leads.
The efficacy of SCS in improving the radicular LP component of FBSS has already been demonstrated in previously published studies, including the EVIDENCE study16, and two new technologies have recently been shown to be effective for treating the BP component, which is known to be recalcitrant to SCS. The first one is high-frequency stimulation17. The second one is the use of surgical multicolumn lead3,18. The main disadvantages of the former technique are that their batteries need more frequent charging and that the programming optimization is challenged by longer "wash-in" times19. The latter technique is more invasive than the percutaneous high-frequency stimulation technique because it requires a small laminectomy, making peroperative paresthesia mapping under local anesthesia challenging, although possible3. Indeed, this procedure can be performed under local anesthesia supplemented by conscious sedation or spinal anesthesia3. In our institution, when targeting back pain in FBSS patients, we place such surgical leads through a small laminectomy at the 10th thoracic level with the patient under general anesthesia. The lasting efficacy of this method with such multicolumn leads for treating LP and BP in FBSS patients has been demonstrated by 3 year follow-up18. A detailed protocol of our method is given below.
1. Patient Selection
2. Neuromodulation Specialist
3. Creation of the Health Insurance File by the NMS
4. Implantation of the Multicolumn Lead
5. Postoperative Trial
6. Implantation of the Internal Pulse Generator
7. Postoperative Care and Follow-up Visits
A prospective, non-randomized, controlled study of 62 consecutive FBSS patients who were implanted with a multicolumn lead using this method in our center, CHR Citadelle, in Liège, Belgium, was recently published in Neuromodulation18 . All patients had had previous spinal surgery, had been screened for possible secondary causes of their pain, and were refractory to optimal medical therapy. Multicolumn surgical leads were placed in all 62 patients in the projection of T8-T9 in the midline position under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic control. Fifty-four patients (87%) had >50% pain reduction at the end of the trial period and were implanted with an IPG.
This study showed that BP, LP, and limitation of daily activity were significantly improved during the entire follow-up, as shown in Figure 5. The quality of sleep improved and the percentages of patients taking any kind of analgesic and co-analgesic medication on a regular basis decreased. We observed an overall complication rate of 19%, with infection of the material being the most frequent complication (7 cases).
For more details on this study, please read our previous article18.
Figure 1: Top left tripolar stimulation configuration. This is the first one tested in order to identify the laterality of the lead. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Four left tripolar longitudinal stimulation configurations used in unilateral screening to obtain an idea of the painful metameric level. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Main types of stimulation configurations for right side screening. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Main types of stimulation configuration groups used for back pain screening. The transverse tripolar group includes six possible transverse tripolar configurations, all with a transverse guarded cathode located at the six rostrocaudal levels of the lead. The half flower-like pattern group includes sixteen configurations, all with a cathode surrounded by four anodes. These twenty-two configurations are possible only with multicolumn leads. The tripolar longitudinal group includes all longitudinal guarded cathode configurations. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Evolution of VAS for leg pain (green), back pain (blue), and limitation in daily activity (orange) across the 36 month follow-up period. Thick horizontal lines are the medians, boxes indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, and error bars are the maximum and minimum. Closed circles correspond to outliers that are above or below 2 times the 75th or 25th percentile. The Friedman test was statistically significant for leg pain (χ2(5) = 65.35; P <0.0001), back pain (χ2(5) = 91.64; P <0.0001), and limitation in daily activity (χ2(5) = 77.38; P <0.0001). Post hoc comparisons using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a two-tailed statistically significant P threshold of 0.0033 indicated that VAS scores for leg pain, back pain, and limitation in daily activity were significantly higher at baseline than at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months(*), and that VAS scores for back pain were significantly lower at 2 months than at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months(**). This figure has been modified from a previous article18. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Recent studies have demonstrated that SCS can reliably improve the different pain components of FBSS patients, improve their quality of life (e.g., quality of sleep and physical activity), and these benefits are sustained during a long-term follow-up3,17,18,19.
Depending on the localization of the pain, we use a different approach. When the patient has only unilateral LP, a percutaneous 8-contact lead is placed in the posterior spinal epidural space under fluoroscopic imaging and the final position of the lead is based on intraoperative paresthesia mapping involving patient feedback. When the patient has bilateral LP or a BP component, a surgical 16-contact lead is used. Unfortunately, correct placement of this paddle electrode requires a small laminectomy, which would clearly be uncomfortable for patients under local anesthesia. That explains why this multicolumn lead is not positioned according to the topography of the pain, but strictly anatomically, in the projection of the T8–T9 vertebral bodies. Considering the geometry of that surgical electrode and the variety of programming possibilities, a standard positioning of the device allows optimal paresthesia coverage of BP and LP areas. Other teams use two 8-contact percutaneous leads for treating both leg and back pain17. This technique allows them to avoid a general anesthesia, but in a subset of patients with extensive spinal fusions percutaneous access cannot be obtained and the surgical electrode is the only option. Besides, to target the BP area, very high frequency (10 kHz or burst) stimulations are applied through those percutaneous leads. That depletes the battery much more rapidly, leading to more frequent recharging or surgical replacement19.
When the lead is placed, it is connected to an external stimulator for four weeks. This long test period, which is required by Belgian law as a condition to reimburse the implantation of the pulse generator in a second operation, might explain why infection of the material is the most frequent complication of this surgery. The prolonged transcutaneous access could favor bacterial contamination. Several authors have indeed recommended a shorter test period26.
SCS is a field in constant evolution and new methods to improve FBSS patients' outcomes are constantly being studied. Recently, the observational SCS-LUMINA study found that a new device called "Anatomically Guided Neural Targeted" provides even better LP and BP relief than conventional SCS. This new device is compatible with percutaneous and paddle leads and could be an important tool in the treatment of LP and BP in FBSS patients19. It is important constantly to reset the place of each tool in the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of FBSS patients in light of medical and technological advances.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to thank Gabrielle Leyden for revising the final draft of this paper.
16-20 GA needle | BD Insyte- W | ||
NaCl 0.9% 1 L | Baxter | AKE1324 | |
Iso-betadine Dermic (500mL) | MEDA | 09461.16 | |
Iso-betadine Soap (500mL) | MEDA | 09462.10 | |
Iso-betadine hydroalcoolic (125 mL) | MEDA | 41534.1 | |
Ziehm Vision R FD | Ziehm Imaging Inc. | CB05183 | |
Marcain 0.5% + adrenaline 1/200.000 20 mL | Astrazenca | PA 970/46/2 | 0.5% Bupivacaine/1:200,000 adrenaline solution |
external Neurostimulator (eNs) | Medtronic Inc., MN, USA | 37022 | |
Trousse de colonne lombaire CHR Citadelle (Procedure pack) | Mölnlycke | 97061425-01 | |
OR Table | Maquet | 1150.30D0 | |
OR Lights | Trumpf | 1929278 | |
Specify SureScan MRI | Medtronic Inc., MN, USA | 977C165 | Multicolumn lead |
Primeadvanced surescan mri neurostimulator | Medtronic Inc., MN, USA | 97702 | Internal Pulse Generator |
Monocryl 3/0 | Ethicon | Y423 | |
Polysorb 2/0 | Covidien | GL123 | |
Polysorb 1 | Covidien | CL535 | |
Polysorb 2 | Covidien | CL055 | |
Cutiplast Steril 20×10 cm | Smith&Nephew | 66001475 | Bandage |
MyStim Programmer | Medtronic Inc., MN, USA | 97740 | |
FixoCath | Pajunk | 001151-37Z | |
N'Vision Programmer | Medtronic Inc., MN, USA | 8840 | |
3M Tegaderm Film 10x12cm | 3M Deutschland GmbH | 1626W | |
Extension Kit | Medtronic Inc., MN, USA | 37081-40 | |
Paracetamol | Fresenius Kabi | ||
Tradonal | Meda Pharma | ||
Sufentanil | Janssen- Cilag | ||
Propolipid 1% | Fresenius Kabi | ||
Ketalar (Ketamine Hydrochloride) | Pfizer | ||
Rocuronium Bromide | Bbraun | ||
Cefazolin | Milan |